Reserva De La Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona; Investigacion Para Su Conservacion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reserva De La Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona; Investigacion Para Su Conservacion RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA MONTES AZULES, SELVA LACANDONA; INVESTIGACION PARA SU CONSERVACION Editado por Miguel Angel Vásquez Sánchez y Mario A. Ramos Olmos PUBUCACIONES ESPECIALES ECOSFERA No. 1 Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A. C. Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A.C. -ECOSFERA- Este Centro fue fundado en 1989, con los objetivos de promover y realizar acciones orientadas al aprovechamiento sostenido y restauración de los recursos naturales, a la investigación sobre la diversidad biológica, el impacto de las actividades humanas en las áreas silvestres y al manejo de aquellas de importancia biológica. Los miembros del Centro trabajan jjermanentemente en el forta­ lecimiento de un grupo multidisciplinario, con capacidad de generar la información necesaria para resolver problemas locales y regionales desde una perspectiva integral. Adicionalmente tiene como objetivos, la for­ mación y capacitación de recursos humanos, así como la difusión de la información gene­ rada en sus investigaciones. Sus programas de investigación abarcan: Estudios del Me­ dio Físico, Conservación de Especies Ame­ nazadas y en Peligro de Extinción, Manejo y Aprovechamiento de Fauna Silvestre, Pla­ nificación y Manejo de Areas Silvestres, De­ sarrollo Comunitario y Conservación. Fotos de portada: Foto superior izquierda: Ilach Winik (H om ­ bre verdadero). Bonampak (Foto: M. A. Vás­ quez) Foto superior derecha: Rana arborícola Hyla ebraccata (Foto; R.C. Vogt) Foto inferior derecha: Jaguar {Panthera onca). Foto; J.L. Patjane Foto inferior izquierda; Niños lacandones (Foto; L J. M arch) RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA MONTES AZULES, SELVA LACANDONA: INVESTIGACION PARA SU CONSERVACION EC/333.711/R4/EJ. 5 Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva EC0010011149 O 5 AGO 2008 RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA MONTES AZULES, SELVA LACANDONA: INVESTIGACION PARA SU CONSERVACION Editado por Miguel Angel Vásquez Sánchez y Mario A. Ramos Olmos Comité Editorial; Ignacio J. March Mifsut Eduardo Iñigo Elias Marco A, Lazcano Barrero PUBLICACIONES ESPECIALES ECOSFERA No. 1 MEXICO 1 9 9 2 Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A.C. (ECOSFERA). Apartado Postal 219. San Cristóbal de las Casas, 29200 Chiapas. México. * ECOSFERA es una organización no gubemamental, sin fines de lucro y dedicada a la conservación de los recursos naturales, a través de actividades de investigación, formación de recursos humanos, difiisión y manejo. 1992. Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A.C., Programa de Apoyo a la Biodiversidad, Centro de Investigaciones Ecológicas del Sureste/Consorcio para la Conservación y Desarrollo Sustentable del Sureste de México y el Consorcio para México y los Estados Unidos de la Universidad de Califomia UC MEXUS. © Todos los derechos reservados. No. Catálogo No. ISBN 970-91173-0-0 Se sugiere citar este documento de la siguiente manera: Vásquez-Sánchez, M. A. y M. A. Ramos (eds.), 1992. Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona: Investigación para su Conservación. Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A.C. San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. México. Pubi. Esp. Ecosfera 1. 436 pp. La información contenida en este libro podrá ser fotocopiada y utilizada sin fines de lucro, citando la fílente. © Fotografías de la portada: José Luis Patjane, Richard C. Vogt, Miguel Angel Vásquez-Sánchez e Ignacio J. March. Publicado por ECOSFERA Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos Naturales, A. C. _________ rl|ECOSFEFIPI Con el apoyo de: Biü(li\ersitv TV N a tu r r ^ ^ (w ism um y WWF A U.S.A.I D.-funded consortium o/W orld Wildlife Fund, The Nature Conservancy, and World Resources Instititute CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES ECOLOGICAS DEL SURESTE/ CONSORCIO PARA LA CONSERVACION Y DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DEL SURESTE DE MEXICO UC MEXUS CONSORCIO PARA MEXICO Y LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE CALIFORNIA CONTENIDO Página Presentación. Lic. Carlos Salinas de Gortari. Presidente Constitucional de los Estados UnidosMexicanos ........................................... xi Prólogo. Lic. José Patrocinio González Garrido. Gobemador Constitucional del Estado de Chiapas........................................................ xiü Nota editorial................................................................................................................... xv I. ASPECTOS GENERALES 1. Introducción. Mario A Ramos Olmos...................................................................................................... 1 2. Una visión sobre el manejo del trópico húmedo de México. Arturo Gómez Pompa..................................................................................................... 7 3. La Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules: Antecedentes. Miguel A. Vásquez Sánchez.......................................................................................... 19 IL EL MEDIO FISICO. 4. Las formas del relieve y los tipos de vegetación de la Selva Lacandona. José Gerardo Garcia Gil y José Lugo Hupb................................................................... 39 III. DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA. 5. Contribución al conocimiento de la vegetación de la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacadona, Chiapas, México. Gonzalo Castillo Campos y Héctor Narave Flores....................................................... 51 6. Vegetación acuática de la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, Chiapas. Pedro Ramírez Garcia y Antonio Lot H........................................................................ 87 Página 7. Las lombrices terrestres de la Selva Lacandona: Sistemática, ecología y potencial práctico. Carlos Fragoso.................................................................................................................. 101 8. Estado actual del conocimiento sobre los insectos de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Miguel Angel Morón....................................................................................................... 119 9. Peces de la Selva Lacandona, un recurso potencial. Marco A. Lazcano-Barrero y Richard C. Vogt............................................................. 135 10. Anfibios y reptiles de la Selva Lacandona. Marco A. Lazcano-Barrero, Eleuterio Góngora Arones y Richard C.Vogt ............... 145 11. Aves de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Femando González-Garcia............................................................................................... 173 12. Mamíferos de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas. Ignacio J. March y Marcelo Aranda.............................................................................. 201 13. Aspectos de la ecología de la tortuga blanca (Dermatemys mawii) en la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules. Richard C. Vogt y Oscar A. Flores-Villela................................................................... 221 14. Ubicación zoogeográfica de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México, a través de su fauna de quirópteros. Rodrigo A. Medellín, Oscar Sánchez Herrera y Guillermina Urbano V.................... 233 IV. ASPECTOS HISTORICOS Y SOCIALES. 15. Aspectos arqueológicos de la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules. Susanna M. Ekholm......................................................................................................... 253 16. Una selva herida de muerte, historia reciente de la Selva Lacandona. Jan de Vos......................................................................................................................... 267 17. Características socioeconómicas de la Selva Lacandona. Miguel A. Vásquez-Sánchez, Ignacio J. March y Marco A. Lazcano-Barrero......................................................................................... 287 18. Transición epidemiológica en la población de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas. Marcos Arana C. y Enrique Loyola............................................................................... 325 Página V. CONSIDERACIONES FINALES. 19. Análisis y lista temática de referencias bibliográficas y cartográficas sobre la Selva Lacandona y la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules. Ignacio J. March y Miguel A. Vásquez Sánchez........................................................ 343 20. Importancia, situación actual y perspectivas de conservación en la Selva Lacandona. Marco A. Lazcano-Barrero, Ignacio J. March y Miguel A. Vásquez Sánchez........................................................................................ 393 PRESENTACION CARITOS SA.K.OTA8 13 K OOR’TABK PRESIDENTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS Los Pinos, D.F. 10 de marzo de 1992. Distinguido lector: La gran riqueza floristica y faunistica de México constituye un recurso biòtico potencial que es patrimonio de todos los mexica­ nos. El cambio de recurso potencial a recurso real sólo se puede dar cuando la investigación científica y tecnológica sobre dichos recursos permite su transformación para su uso. Este libro constituye un aporte muy importante de un grupo de científicos interesados por conocer la flora, fauna y ecología de una de las regiones más importantes ecológicas de México y preocupados por su conservación a largo plazo. La selva lacandona no sólo es importante por su flora y fauna, también es importante por ser el sitio en donde se desarrolló una de las más grandes culturas tropicales del mundo: la cultura Maya. También lo es por las culturas que hoy en día habitan la selva; este libro incluye estos temas tan inseparables de la conservación biológica. Felicito a los editores y a los autores de esta importante
Recommended publications
  • Sunday, March 4, 2012
    Joint Meeting of the Southeastern and Southwestern Branches Entomological Society of America 4-7 March 2012 Little Rock, Arkansas 0 Dr. Norman C. Leppla President, Southeastern Branch of the Entomological Society of America, 2011-2012 Dr. Allen E. Knutson President, Southwestern Branch of the Entomological Society of America, 2011-2012 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Presidents Norman C. Leppla (SEB) and Allen E. 1 Knutson (SWB) ESA Section Names and Acronyms 5 PROGRAM SUMMARY 6 Meeting Notices and Policies 11 SEB Officers and Committees: 2011-2012 14 SWB Officers and Committees: 2011-2012 16 SEB Award Recipients 19 SWB Award Recipients 36 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM SATURDAY AND SUNDAY SUMMARY 44 MONDAY SUMMARY 45 Plenary Session 47 BS Student Oral Competition 48 MS Student Oral Competition I 49 MS Student Oral Competition II 50 MS Student Oral Competition III 52 MS Student Oral Competition IV 53 PhD Student Oral Competition I 54 PhD Student Oral Competition II 56 BS Student Poster Competition 57 MS Student Poster Competition 59 PhD Student Poster Competition 62 Linnaean Games Finals/Student Awards 64 TUESDAY SUMMARY 65 Contributed Papers: P-IE (Soybeans and Stink Bugs) 67 Symposium: Spotted Wing Drosophila in the Southeast 68 Armyworm Symposium 69 Symposium: Functional Genomics of Tick-Pathogen 70 Interface Contributed Papers: PBT and SEB Sections 71 Contributed Papers: P-IE (Cotton and Corn) 72 Turf and Ornamentals Symposium 73 Joint Awards Ceremony, Luncheon, and Photo Salon 74 Contributed Papers: MUVE Section 75 3 Symposium: Biological Control Success
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Lewinsohn with Paulo Inácio Prado USP Mário Almeida Neto UFG Adriana Almeida UFRN Leonardo Ré Jorge Unicamp ______Laboratório Interações Insetos-Plantas Depto
    Phytophagous insects on flower heads of Neotropical Compositae Thomas Lewinsohn with Paulo Inácio Prado USP Mário Almeida Neto UFG Adriana Almeida UFRN Leonardo Ré Jorge Unicamp _________________________ Laboratório Interações Insetos-Plantas Depto. Biologia Animal, Inst. Biologia Unicamp – University of Campinas herbivores+plants: the multicellular majority Terry Erwin, 1982: “... as many as 30 million insects” Terry Erwin who’s who among the herbivorous insects beetles moths, butterflies flies, midges sawflies bugs, aphids grasshoppers thrips walking sticks data sources: taxonomic studies taxonomy based on adults - what do larvae do? no host records unreliable host identification data sources: biocontrol surveys Carduus nutans with Rhynocyllus conicus (Curculionidae) data sources: community diversity studies • Plant samples (plots, individual trees) and • insect mass samples (net sweep, suction samples, fogging, light traps) Murdoch, Evans & Peterson 1972 adult insects on plants: herbivores or tourists? Insects and Compositae as ecological study systems A model system for herbivore evolution Solidago – Eurosta – parasitoids/predators A model system for population dynamics ragwort, Senecio jacobaea - cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae Longitarsus Chromatomyia Melanagromyza metacommunity dynamics a field experiment From biocontrol surveys to ecological insights Biocontrol prospecting in South America Baccharis Daniel Gandolfo Gutierrezia Chromolaena odorata > Campuloclinium macrocephalum basic study design a suitable plant-herbivore system
    [Show full text]
  • Digging Deeper Into the Ecology of Subterranean Ants: Diversity and Niche Partitioning Across Two Continents
    diversity Article Digging Deeper into the Ecology of Subterranean Ants: Diversity and Niche Partitioning across Two Continents Mickal Houadria * and Florian Menzel Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Soil fauna is generally understudied compared to above-ground arthropods, and ants are no exception. Here, we compared a primary and a secondary forest each on two continents using four different sampling methods. Winkler sampling, pitfalls, and four types of above- and below-ground baits (dead, crushed insects; melezitose; living termites; living mealworms/grasshoppers) were applied on four plots (4 × 4 grid points) on each site. Although less diverse than Winkler samples and pitfalls, subterranean baits provided a remarkable ant community. Our baiting system provided a large dataset to systematically quantify strata and dietary specialisation in tropical rainforest ants. Compared to above-ground baits, 10–28% of the species at subterranean baits were overall more common (or unique to) below ground, indicating a fauna that was truly specialised to this stratum. Species turnover was particularly high in the primary forests, both concerning above-ground and subterranean baits and between grid points within a site. This suggests that secondary forests are more impoverished, especially concerning their subterranean fauna. Although subterranean ants rarely displayed specific preferences for a bait type, they were in general more specialised than above-ground ants; this was true for entire communities, but also for the same species if they foraged in both strata. Citation: Houadria, M.; Menzel, F.
    [Show full text]
  • American Museum Novitates
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3823, 80 pp. January 16, 2015 Diverse new scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in amber from the Cretaceous and Eocene with a phylogenetic framework for fossil Coccoidea ISABELLE M. VEA1, 2 AND DAVID A. GRIMALDI2 ABSTRACT Coccoids are abundant and diverse in most amber deposits around the world, but largely as macropterous males. Based on a study of male coccoids in Lebanese amber (Early Cretaceous), Burmese amber (Albian-Cenomanian), Cambay amber from western India (Early Eocene), and Baltic amber (mid-Eocene), 16 new species, 11 new genera, and three new families are added to the coccoid fossil record: Apticoccidae, n. fam., based on Apticoccus Koteja and Azar, and includ- ing two new species A. fortis, n. sp., and A. longitenuis, n. sp.; the monotypic family Hodgsonicoc- cidae, n. fam., including Hodgsonicoccus patefactus, n. gen., n. sp.; Kozariidae, n. fam., including Kozarius achronus, n. gen., n. sp., and K. perpetuus, n. sp.; the irst occurrence of a Coccidae in Burmese amber, Rosahendersonia prisca, n. gen., n. sp.; the irst fossil record of a Margarodidae sensu stricto, Heteromargarodes hukamsinghi, n. sp.; a peculiar Diaspididae in Indian amber, Nor- markicoccus cambayae, n. gen., n. sp.; a Pityococcidae from Baltic amber, Pityococcus monilifor- malis, n. sp., two Pseudococcidae in Lebanese and Burmese ambers, Williamsicoccus megalops, n. gen., n. sp., and Gilderius eukrinops, n. gen., n. sp.; an Early Cretaceous Weitschatidae, Pseudo- weitschatus audebertis, n. gen., n. sp.; four genera considered incertae sedis, Alacrena peculiaris, n. gen., n. sp., Magnilens glaesaria, n. gen., n. sp., and Pedicellicoccus marginatus, n. gen., n. sp., and Xiphos vani, n.
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]
  • WR Anderson. 2006. Eight Segregates from the Neotropical Genus
    Volume16, Number 2 Anderson 191 2006 Segregatesfrom Mascagnia Excerptfrom: W. R.Anderson. 2006. EightSegregates from the NeotropicalGenus Mascagnia (Malpighiaceae) Novon16: 168-204. lMalpighiodes on pages 191-194,195J VII. Malpighiodes Niedenzu, Verz. Vorles. Kcinigl. Lyceum Hosianum Braunsberg 1909/10: 31. 1909. Tetraptery's subsect. MaLltighiodcs (Nie- denzu) Nieclenzu, Arbeiten Bot. Inst. Krinigl. Lyceum Hosianum Braunsl-rerg 4: 12. 7972. LECTOTYPE: MaLpighiodessprucecnn Niedenzu l: MaLpighiodes bracteosu (Crisebach in Mar- tius) W. R. Anclerson]. Brazil, Amazonas: "in vicinibus Barra fManaus], prov. Rio Negro. t,oll. R. Spruce Dec.-Martir-rs 1850-51," R. Spnu:e F0931 (lectotype, designatetl here, M). Woody vines. Petiole eglandular or bearing 2-B small glands in 2 rows; lamina usually bearing I'ew to rnany small glands impressed in abaxial sur{'acein l- 3 rows between midrib and margin; stipLrles mitrttte, triangular, borne on proximal half of petiole or at junction o{' petiole ancl stem, or apparently lac:king. Inllorescence a terminal or lateral compound di- chasium or paniculate dichasium, strictly tlecussate. with the llorvers bortre in pairs or umlrels or corymlrs of (-B); ilorif'erous pecluncle well clevelopecl; bracteoles eglandular, broad ancl rounded (elliptical crr ol-rrrvate),2.54 mm long, borne between midclle ancl aper of peduncle. Sepals valvate, completel,v concealingpetals during enlargemento{'bucl, revolrtte in anthesis, all 5 biglandular; corolla bilaterally symmetrical, the posterior petal somewhat cli{l'erent Ii'om lateral 4; petals yellow turning red in age, glabrous; stamens 10, all fertile; filaments c:a. Il2- c:onnate. straight, those opposite sepals slightly longer than those opposite petals; anthers alike. glallrous; carpels completely connate in ovalv; stvles + straight, sr-rbequal,stottt, truncate at apex rvith the stigma terminal or nearly so.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Adjustments in Neotropical Malpighiaceae
    2007 Contr. Univ. MichiganANDERSON Herb. 25: 137–166. & DAVIS: 2007. NEOTROPICAL MALPIGHIACEAE 137 GENERIC ADJUSTMENTS IN NEOTROPICAL MALPIGHIACEAE William R. Anderson University of Michigan Herbarium 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2287 Charles C. Davis Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2094 ABSTRACT. The genera Bronwenia W. R. Anderson & C. Davis and Calcicola W. R. Anderson & C. Davis are proposed to accommodate species segregated from Banisteriopsis and Mascagnia, respectively, and Cottsia Dubard & Dop is resurrected for the North American species formerly assigned to Janusia. All three genera are described, their morphology and relationships are discussed, and keys to the spe- cies are provided, with nomenclature for each species. For Calcicola and Cottsia distribution maps and descriptions of species are provided. The genus Clonodia is placed in synonymy under Heteropterys, with discussion of relationships, a key to clonodioid species, and nomenclature and a diagnostic description for each species. One new species is described [Bronwenia peckoltii W. R. Anderson & C. Davis] and 19 new combinations are proposed [Bronwenia acapulcensis (Rose) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. acapulcensis var. llanensis (B. Gates) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. brevipedicellata (B. Gates) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. cinerascens (Benth.) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. cornifolia (H. B. K.) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. cornifolia var. maracaybensis (Adr. Juss.) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. cornifolia var. standleyi (B. Gates) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. ferruginea (Cav.) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B. longipilifera (B. Gates) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophobiosis Between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an Overview
    December, 2001 Neotropical Entomology 30(4) 501 FORUM Trophobiosis Between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an Overview JACQUES H.C. DELABIE 1Lab. Mirmecologia, UPA Convênio CEPLAC/UESC, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, CEPLAC, C. postal 7, 45600-000, Itabuna, BA and Depto. Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Univ. Estadual de Santa Cruz, 45660-000, Ilhéus, BA, [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 30(4): 501-516 (2001) Trofobiose Entre Formicidae e Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha e Auchenorrhyncha): Uma Visão Geral RESUMO – Fêz-se uma revisão sobre a relação conhecida como trofobiose e que ocorre de forma convergente entre formigas e diferentes grupos de Hemiptera Sternorrhyncha e Auchenorrhyncha (até então conhecidos como ‘Homoptera’). As principais características dos ‘Homoptera’ e dos Formicidae que favorecem as interações trofobióticas, tais como a excreção de honeydew por insetos sugadores, atendimento por formigas e necessidades fisiológicas dos dois grupos de insetos, são discutidas. Aspectos da sua evolução convergente são apresenta- dos. O sistema mais arcaico não é exatamente trofobiótico, as forrageadoras coletam o honeydew despejado ao acaso na folhagem por indivíduos ou grupos de ‘Homoptera’ não associados. As relações trofobióticas mais comuns são facultativas, no entanto, esta forma de mutualismo é extremamente diversificada e é responsável por numerosas adaptações fisiológicas, morfológicas ou comportamentais entre os ‘Homoptera’, em particular Sternorrhyncha. As trofobioses mais diferenciadas são verdadeiras simbioses onde as adaptações mais extremas são observadas do lado dos ‘Homoptera’. Ao mesmo tempo, as formigas mostram adaptações comportamentais que resultam de um longo período de coevolução. Considerando-se os inse- tos sugadores como principais pragas dos cultivos em nível mundial, as implicações das rela- ções trofobióticas são discutidas no contexto das comunidades de insetos em geral, focalizan- do os problemas que geram em Manejo Integrado de Pragas (MIP), em particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of Psocomorpha (Psocodea: 'Psocoptera')
    Title MORPHOLOGY OF PSOCOMORPHA (PSOCODEA: 'PSOCOPTERA') Author(s) Yoshizawa, Kazunori Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 62, 1- Citation 44 Issue Date 2005-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/10524 Type bulletin (article) File Information Yoshizawa-62.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 62: 1–44 DECEMBER 2005 MORPHOLOGY OF PSOCOMORPHA (PSOCODEA: 'PSOCOPTERA') By KAZUNORI YOSHIZAWA Abstract YOSHIZAWA, K. 2005. Morphology of Psocomorpha (Psocodea: 'Psocoptera'). Ins. matsum. n. s. 62: 1–44, 24 figs. Adult integumental morphology of the suborder Psocomorpha (Psocodea: 'Psocoptera') was examined, and homologies and transformation series of characters throughout the suborder and Psocoptera were discussed. These examinations formed the basis of the recent morphology-based cladistic analysis of the Psocomorpha (Yoshizawa, 2002, Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136: 371–400). Author's address. Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan. E-mail. [email protected]. 1 INTRODUCTION Psocoptera (psocids, booklice or barklice) are a paraphyletic assemblage of non-parasitic members of the order Psocodea (Lyal, 1985; Yoshizawa & Johnson, 2003, 2005; Johnson et al., 2004), containing about 5500 described species (Lienhard, 2003). They are about 1 to 10 mm in length and characterized by well-developed postclypeus, long antennae, pick-like lacinia, reduced prothorax, well-developed pterothorax, etc. Phylogenetically, Psocoptera compose a monophyletic group (the order Psocodea) with parasitic lice ('Phtiraptera': biting lice and sucking lice) (Lyal, 1985; Yoshizawa & Johnson, 2003, in press; Johnson et al., 2004). The order is related to Thysanoptera (thrips) and Hemiptera (bugs, cicadas, etc.) (Yoshizawa & Saigusa, 2001, 2003, but see also Yoshizawa & Johnson, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 46 Million Years of N-Recycling by the Core Symbionts of Turtle Ants
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/185314; this version posted September 7, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Nitrogen conservation, conserved: 46 million years of N-recycling by the core symbionts of 2 turtle ants 3 4 Yi Hu1*, Jon G. Sanders2*, Piotr Łukasik1, Catherine L. D'Amelio 1, John S. Millar3, David R. 5 Vann4, Yemin Lan5, Justin A. Newton1, Mark Schotanus6, John T. Wertz6, Daniel J. C. 6 Kronauer7, Naomi E. Pierce2, Corrie S. Moreau8, Philipp Engel9, Jacob A. Russell1 7 8 1 Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 9 2 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 10 02138, USA 11 3 Department of Medicine, Institute of Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, University of 12 Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 13 4 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 14 19104, USA 15 5 School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health systems, Drexel University, 16 Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 17 6 Department of Biology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA 18 7 Laboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, 19 New York, NY 10065, USA 20 8 Department of Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, 21 USA 22 9 Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, 23 Switzerland bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/185314; this version posted September 7, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]