DOCSLIB.ORG

Physico-Chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Water, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physico-Chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Water, And PHYSICO-CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WATER, AND ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PATHOGENIC ISOLATES FROM SELECTED WATER SOURCES IN SAMBURU SOUTH. BY JEOPHITA JUNE MWAJUMA (B.Sc, P.G.D.E) REG. NO. I56/7341/02 DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND MICROBIAL SCIENCES A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Microbiology) in the School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Kenyatta University April 2010 ii DECLARATION I, Jeophita June Mwajuma, declare that this thesis is my original work and has not been presented for the award of a degree in any other University or any other award. Signature…………………………………... Date………………………….. We confirm that the work reported in this thesis was carried out by the candidate under our supervision. SUPERVISORS: Prof. Paul Okemo Department of Plant and Microbial Sciences Kenyatta University Signature…………………………………... Date………………………….. Dr. Alexander Njue Department of Plant and Microbial Sciences Kenyatta University Signature…………………………………... Date………………………….. Prof. Kiplagat Kotut Department of Plant and Microbial Sciences Kenyatta University Signature…………………………………... Date………………………….. iii DEDICATION For my girls, Neema and Wema. Babies, the sky is the limit! iv Formatted: Centered, Indent: Left: 0.25", 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT No bullets or numbering I wish to thank my supervisors Prof. Paul Okemo, Dr. Alexander Njue and Prof. Kiplagat Kotut for their expert advice and encouragement throughout the period of this study. My gratitude also goes to Earthwatch Institute for funding my research work through the Samburu Communities, Water and Wildlife project. I also wish to thank KEMRI, Welcome Trust Laboratories Kilifi, Wamba Mission Hospital and Mombasa Polytechnic University College for providing me with laboratory space and analytical tools. My sincere appreciation to Dr. Nicolas Oguge, Dr. Ben Munyali, Dr. Tom Achia, Mr. Philip Leitore, Ms. Jacinta Patrine, Mr. Lewa Pole, Mr. Ben Mvera, Mr.Humphrey Kisembe and Mr. John Kahindo for their individual professional assistance in the course of my research work. I thank my family, Steve, Baraka and Rani, for their warmth and support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DECLARATION................................................................................................................ ii DEDICATION.................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................ iv TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………….v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... ix LIST OF PLATES………………………………………………………………………xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ....................................................... xii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background to the study .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Research hypotheses ................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Research questions ................................................................................................... 5 1.5 The general objective ............................................................................................... 6 1.6 Specific objectives ................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................... 8 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Biological hazards of water pollution ...................................................................... 8 2.2 Transmission of enteropathogens .......................................................................... 10 2.3 Bacteriological indicators of pollution ................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Concept of indicator organisms ..................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Total coliforms ............................................................................................... 14 2.3.3 Faecal coliforms ............................................................................................. 16 2.3.4 Escherichia coli ............................................................................................. 16 2.4 Nuisance organisms ............................................................................................... 18 2.5 Pathogenic bacteria ................................................................................................ 19 2.5.1 Salmonella...................................................................................................... 19 2.5.2 Shigella .......................................................................................................... 21 2.5.3 Escherichia coli ............................................................................................. 22 2.5.4 Campylobacter ............................................................................................... 23 2.5.5 Vibrio ............................................................................................................. 24 vi 2.5.6 Leptospira ...................................................................................................... 24 2.5.7 Legionella ...................................................................................................... 25 2.5.8 Yersinia .......................................................................................................... 25 2.5.9 Aeromonas ..................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Antimicrobial sensitivity of common enteropathogens ......................................... 27 CHAPTER THREE ......................................................................................................... 29 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................... 29 3.1 Study area............................................................................................................... 29 3.1.1 Location ......................................................................................................... 29 3.1.2 Climate ........................................................................................................... 30 3.1.3 The People. .................................................................................................... 31 3.3 Field tests ............................................................................................................... 33 3.4 Bioassay ................................................................................................................. 34 3.4.1 Total plate count ............................................................................................ 34 3.4.2 Coliform tests ................................................................................................. 34 3.4.4 Test for Escherichia coli ................................................................................ 35 3.4.5 Biochemical tests ........................................................................................... 35 3.4.6 Faecal Streptococci ........................................................................................ 37 3.5 Isolation of bacterial pathogens ............................................................................. 37 3.5.1 Identification of Salmonella and Shigella ...................................................... 38 3.5.2 Detection of vibrios and aeromonads ............................................................ 38 3.5.3 Detection of Campylobacter jejuni ................................................................ 39 3.6 Antibiotic sensitivity testing .................................................................................. 39 3.6.1 Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion method ............................................................... 39 3.6.2 Minimum inhibitory concentrations E- test ................................................... 40 3.7 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) ................................................................ 41 3.8 Analysis of results .................................................................................................. 42 CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................ 43 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 43 4.1 Physico-chemical properties of water in Samburu district .................................... 43 4.2 Bacterial quality of water ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Evaluation of 2.0 Mcfarland Etest Method for Detection of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus Aureus
    10.2478/abm-2010-0016 Asian Biomedicine Vol. 4 No. 1 February 2010; 141-145 Brief communication (Original) An evaluation of 2.0 McFarland Etest method for detection of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Montri Pongkumpaia, Suwanna Trakulsomboonb, Chusana Suankrataya aDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330; bDivision of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand Background: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or heterogeneous vancomycin- intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) have become increasingly reported from various parts of the world. hVISA cannot be detected by routine test for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for vancomycin. The gold standard method for detection, population analysis profiles (PAP) method, is complicated, time-consuming, expensive, and needs well-trained microbiologists. Objective: Evaluate of 2.0 McFarland Etest method, in comparison with the PAP method, for detection of hVISA in clinical specimens. Methods: All methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains from clinical specimens isolated from consecutive patients attended at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok between 2006 and 2007 were studied. 1 hundred nineteen specimens were obtained. The PAP method detected six hVISA strains 5 from blood and from cultures) from four patients at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, accounting for a prevalence of 6.35%. The MIC determined by agar dilution method was in the range of 2-3 μg/mL. Results: 2.0 McFarland Etest method detected no false positive and five false negatives (42%), and gave a sensitivity and a specificity of 16.7% and 100%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Profile of Urinary Tract Infection and Antimicrobial
    Journal name: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Article Designation: Original Research Year: 2016 Volume: 12 Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Dovepress Running head verso: Derese et al Running head recto: Bacterial profile of UTI and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern open access to scientific and medical research DOI: 99831 Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Bacterial profile of urinary tract infection and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among pregnant women attending at Antenatal Clinic in Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia Behailu Derese1 Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial profile of urinary tract infection Haji Kedir2 (UTI) and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among pregnant women attending at antenatal Zelalem Teklemariam3 clinic in Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia. Fitsum Weldegebreal3 Patients and methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from Senthilkumar Balakrishnan4 February 18, 2015 to March 25, 2015. Clean-catch midstream urine specimens were collected from 186 pregnant women using sterile containers. Then, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility 1Department of Medical Laboratory, tests were performed by standard disk diffusion method. Patient information was obtained using Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dire Dawa, 2Department of Public Health, pretested structured questionnaire. Data were entered and cleaned using EpiData Version 3 and 3Department of Medical Laboratory then exported to Statistical Package for Social Science (Version 16) for further analysis. Sciences, 4Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Results: The prevalence of significant bacteriuria was 14%. Gram-negative bacteria were and Medical Sciences, Haramaya more prevalent (73%). Escherichia coli (34.6%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (19.2%), University, Harar, Ethiopia Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.4%), and Klebsiella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasteurella Multocida Isolated from Cattle
    Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 3 (04), pp. 106-110, April, 2013 Available online at http://www.japsonline.com DOI: 10.7324/JAPS.2013.3419 ISSN 2231-3354 Antibiotic Susceptibility and Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Pathogen Pasteurella Multocida Isolated from Cattle Azmat Jabeen, Mahrukh Khattak, Shahzad Munir*, Qaiser Jamal, Mubashir Hussain Department of Microbiology, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Pasteurella multocida is a Gram negative, non motile and coccobacillus bacterium. It has 5 strains i.e. A, B, D, Received on: 01/02/2013 E and F and 16 serotypes (1-16). In present study, we analyzed Pasteurella multocida B: 2 strains, responsible Revised on: 19/02/2013 for Hemorrhagic Septicemia (HS) in cattle, on morphological/microbial, biochemical, molecular level and to Accepted on: 15/03/2013 check the antibiotic sensitivity of the Pasteurella multocida. Microbial analysis showed that while grown on Available online: 27/04/2013 Brain Heart Infusion agar plates and Blood Agar Base Medium, grayish lustrous colonies of Pasteurella multocida were observed. Gram staining showed that Pasteurella multocida are gram negative. Microscopic Key words: observations revealed it to be coccobacillus and it was non- motile. Identification was conducted by Pasteurella multocida, conventional biochemical tests and percentage identification of Analytical Profile Index was 96 %. Antibiotic Hemorrhagic Septicemia, sensitivity with different antibiotics was checked by disk diffusion method and was found resistant to Analytical Profile Index, Augmentin, Amoxicillin and Aztreonam and was more susceptible to Ceftiofur. On molecular level its DNA Antibiotic sensitivity. was extracted and was run with marker having range from 0.5 – 10 kb.
    [Show full text]
  • (IQC) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Using Disk Diffusion
    Internal Quality Control (IQC) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Using Disk Diffusion National AMR Surveillance Network, NCDC National Programme on Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance National Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi April 2019 CONTENTS I. Scope .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Selection of Strains for Quality Control ..................................................................................................... 2 III. Maintenance and Testing of QC Strains..................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1: Flow Chart: Maintenance of QC strains in a bacteriology lab......................................................... 4 IV. Quality Control (QC) Results—Documentation - Zone Diameter ............................................................. 5 V. QC Conversion Plan ................................................................................................................................... 5 1. The 20- or 30-Day Plan .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. The 15-Replicate (3× 5 Day) Plan ......................................................................................................... 5 3. Implementing Weekly Quality Control Testing ..................................................................................... 6 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ketoconazole Susceptibility Test for Malassezia Pachydermatis Using Modified Leeming–Notman Agar
    Journal of Fungi Article A Ketoconazole Susceptibility Test for Malassezia pachydermatis Using Modified Leeming–Notman Agar Bo-Young Hsieh 1,2, Wei-Hsun Chao 3, Yi-Jing Xue 2 and Jyh-Mirn Lai 2,* 1 Lugu Township Administration, Nanto County 55844, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chiayi University, No. 580, XinMin Rd., Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Hospitality Management, WuFung University, Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-5-2732920; Fax: +886-5-2732917 Received: 18 September 2018; Accepted: 14 November 2018; Published: 16 November 2018 Abstract: The aim of this study was to establish a ketoconazole susceptibility test for Malassezia pachydermatis using modified Leeming–Notman agar (mLNA). The susceptibilities of 33 M. pachydermatis isolates obtained by modified CLSI M27-A3 method were compared with the results by disk diffusion method, which used different concentrations of ketoconazole on 6 mm diameter paper disks. Results showed that 93.9% (31/33) of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained from both methods were similar (consistent with two methods within 2 dilutions). M. pachydermatis BCRC 21676 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used to verify the results obtained from the disk diffusion and modified CLSI M27-A3 tests, and they were found to be consistent. Therefore, the current study concludes that this new novel test—using different concentrations of reagents on cartridge disks to detect MIC values against ketoconazole—can be a cost-effective, time-efficient, and less technically demanding alternative to existing methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urine of Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic of Mother and Child Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria
    Vol. 15(5), pp. 209-216, May, 2021 DOI: 10.5897/AJMR2021.9491 Article Number: FAE2CD666760 ISSN: 1996-0808 Copyright ©2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article African Journal of Microbiology Research http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMR Full Length Research Paper Phenotypic and molecular characterization of multiple- resistant gram-negative bacteria in urine of pregnant women attending antenatal clinic of Mother and Child hospital, Ondo, Nigeria 1 1 2* Eunice Damilola Wilkie , Anthonia Olufunke Oluduro , Thonda Oluwakemi Abike and Chidinma Vivian Chukwudum1 1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Kings University, Odeomu, Osun State, Nigeria. Received 27 January, 2021; Accepted 12 March, 2021 Phenotypic and molecular characterization of multiple antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urine samples of pregnant women in Mother and Child Hospital, Nigeria was reported. In the study, 407 apparently healthy pregnant women were recruited. Structured questionnaire was administered to the patients to obtain their socio-demographic information and the medical history. Urine samples were collected, processed and analysed using standard microbiological procedures. Detailed identification of the bacteria isolates was done using biochemical characterization using Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology and Analytical Profile Index (API) Kit. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the bacteria isolates was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer’s disk diffusion technique. Detection of the beta lactamase resistance genes (bla CTX-M and Tet A) was done by polymerase chain reactions (PCR) with appropriate primers. The following Gram-negative bacteria were recovered comprising Pseudomonas aeruginosa 48 (34.0%), Escherichia coli 30 (21.3%), Klebsiella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Etest and the Routine Multi-Disc Agar Diffusion Susceptibility of Staphylococcus Species
    Yah SC Etest and routine agar testing of Staphylococcus Comparison of the Etest and the routine multi-disc agar diffusion susceptibility of Staphylococcus species *Yah SC1, Ching FP2 and Atuanya EI3 Abstract. Aims: The present study, tend to evaluate the validity and accuracy of Etest as a method for performing in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus with comparison to the routine multi disc agar diffusion. This is because the Etest susceptibility method is not yet known as a rapid, simple reliable technique in developing countries as it combine the functions of both dilution and diffusion technique. Materials and methods: Ninety-seven Staphylococcus aureus and eighty- three Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates were obtained from wound samples and identified according to standard morphological and biochemical methods. The antibiotics susceptibility patterns were determined both by agar disc diffusion and Etest methods in accordance to NCCLS (1997) criteria and manufacturer (AB Biodisk Sweden) respectively. Results: On the Etest strips, Staph aureus was 83.5% sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 52.6% to gentamicin, 48.5% to ampicillin and 8.2% to chloramphenicol while on the multi-disc agar diffusion plates 80.4% of Staph aureus were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 49.5% to gentamicin, 39.2% to ampicillin and 12.4% to chloramphenicol.. On the Etest strips, 80.7% of Staph epidermidis were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 34.9% to gentamicin, 25.3% to ampicillin and 15.7% to chloramphenicol while on the multi- disc agar diffusion plates 89.2% of Staph epidermidis were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 34.9% to gentamicin, 25.3% to ampicillin and 32.5% to chloramphenicol.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Pregnant Women in Debre Markos, Ethiopia: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates
    Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Pregnant Women in Debre Markos, Ethiopia: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Yihunalem Addis University of Gondar Sirak Biset University of Gondar Mucheye Gizachew ( [email protected] ) University of Gondar Research Article Keywords: Asymptomatic bacteriuria, antibiotic susceptibility prole, pregnant women, Debre Markos Posted Date: June 22nd, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-618400/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract In low-income countries, asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) during pregnancy is a major cause for both maternal and foetal health risks. Rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance also needs continuous monitoring of susceptibility proles of uropathogens. We conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study to deterimne prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and associated risk factors of ASB among pregnant women. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected by interview and extracted from women's medical records. Identication of bacteria from urine, and their susceptibility tests were done by using recommended methods. Logistic regression analyses were done by SPSS versions 20. The p-value <0.05 at 95% CI was considered as statistically signicant. Of the 172 study participants, 24 (14%) had ASB. Among 24 isolates, 13 (54.2%) were gram-negative, and of these, E. coli (8; 61.5%) was predominant followed by K. pneumoniae (4; 30.8%). Previous UTI and antibiotic use were signicantly associated risk factors for ASB. E .coli, S. areus and CoNS were resistant to tetracycline (87.5%), cotrimoxazole (83.3%), and gentamycin (80%), respectively. Prevalence of ASB was lower than many previous reports in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Microbiology 12Th Edition
    Volume 1 Manual of Clinical Microbiology 12th Edition Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 94.66.220.5 MCM12_FM.indd 1 On: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:17:55 2/12/19 6:48 PM Volume 1 Manual of Clinical Microbiology 12th Edition EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Karen C. Carroll Michael A. Pfaller Division of Medical Microbiology, Departments of Pathology and Epidemiology Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins (Emeritus), University of Iowa, University School of Medicine, Iowa City, and JMI Laboratories, Baltimore, Maryland North Liberty, Iowa VOLUME EDITORS Marie Louise Landry Robin Patel Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Alexander J. McAdam Sandra S. Richter Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio David W. Warnock Atlanta, Georgia Washington, DC Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 94.66.220.5 MCM12_FM.indd 2 On: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:17:55 2/12/19 6:48 PM Volume 1 Manual of Clinical Microbiology 12th Edition EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Karen C. Carroll Michael A. Pfaller Division of Medical Microbiology, Departments of Pathology and Epidemiology Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins (Emeritus), University of Iowa, University School of Medicine, Iowa City, and JMI Laboratories, Baltimore, Maryland North Liberty, Iowa VOLUME EDITORS Marie Louise Landry Robin Patel Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Alexander J. McAdam Sandra S. Richter Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio David W.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization, Prevalance and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern
    International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2018; 2(6): 31-42 ISSN (P): 2522-6614 ISSN (E): 2522-6622 © Gynaecology Journal Characterization, prevalance and antimicrobial www.gynaecologyjournal.com 2018; 2(6): 31-42 susceptibility pattern of bacterial uropathogens isolated Received: 21-09-2018 Accepted: 24-10-2018 from pregnant women at Lahore general hospital, Lahore, Pakistan Rabia Habib Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Pakistan Rabia Habib, Muhammad Danish Mehmood, Sana Noreen, Huma Anwar, Mehreen Gul, Nazia Ayub and Almas Raza Muhammad Danish Mehmood Ottoman Pharma (Immuno Division), Raiwind Road Lahore, Abstract Pakistan Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in ladies living in developing countries which may progress to complications such as pyelonephritis and preterm delivery during pregnancy. The present study provides an Sana Noreen insight for causative agent of UTI, their prevalence in pregnant ladies and its association with age, Ottoman Pharma (Immuno metabolic disorder and gestational period. Total of 375 midstream samples were collected from pregnant Division), Raiwind Road Lahore, women, pure culture were segregated on selective media and identified through analytical profile index Pakistan (API) to evaluate prevalence of uropathogens in UTI and ASB patients. Isolated uropathogenic E. coli were further characterized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers for genotype cjrA, cjrB, Huma Anwar and cjrC. Among 375 midstream urine samples of pregnant women, 160 cases of UTI and ASB (≥105 Ottoman Pharma (Immuno CFU) were recorded. API analysis of such samples showed 65(40.6%), 55(34.35%) and 40(25%) of E. coli, Division), Raiwind Road Lahore, Pakistan Enterococci and Staphylococci respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Anaerobic Bacteria in Clinical Specimens
    Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology, July 2012 Vol. 21, No. 3 Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Anaerobic Bacteria in Clinical Specimens *Wafaa N. El-tayab, **Fatma Alzhraa M. Gomaa *Associate Professor of Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt **Associate Professor of Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy for girls- Al-Azhar University, Egypt ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the ability of API 20A, and Microscan Rapid- Anaerobe identification system to identify a spectrum of clinically significant anaerobic isolates against the gold standard conventional method. Also to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic isolates using different methods. Materials and Methods: Anaerobes were isolated from the different clinical specimens and all isolates were initially identified by conventional tests. Identification of isolates were made also by using the API 20A and Microscan systems. Antimicrobial susceptibility of all isolates were determined by disc diffusion and broth-disk method and compared to MIC determined by broth dilution method. Results: A total of 51 isolates were recovered from clinical specimens. API 20A and Microscan correctly identified 70.6% and 82.4% of strains to species level respectively. Eight strains were misidentified by API 20A and 9 were misidentified by Microscan. B. fragilis group isolates were the most encountered clinically significant isolates among the gram-negative anaerobes. Penicillin and ampicillin had poor activity against B. fragilis group, Prevotella spp. Eubacterium spp. and Veillonella spp. Members of the B. fragilis group were more resistant to cefoxitin, than other anaerobes (66.6%). Resistance to clindamycin varied among the species range from 11.1% to 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria Meningitidis, Streptococcus Pneumoniae, and Haemophilus Influenzae WHO Manual, 2Nd Edition
    WHO/IVB.11.09 Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae WHO MANUAL, 2ND EDITION Photo: Jon Shadid/UNICEF WHO/IVB.11.09 Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae WHO MANUAL, 2ND EDITION1 1 The first edition has the WHO reference WHO/CDS/CSR/EDC/99.7: Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_CDS_CSR_EDC_99.7.pdf © World Health Organization 2011 This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization. All rights reserved. This document may, however, be reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]