DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Environmental Assessment - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation April 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Environmental Assessment - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation April 2015 Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation April 2015 Norfolk County Council Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 320859 EVT EES 002 B C:\Users\lev33720\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_EUNAPiMS\ c1569161403\Norfolk LFRMS Environmental Report Draft for Consultation April07 2015.docxApril 2015 StrategicNorfolk Local EnvironmentalFlood Risk Management Assessment Strategy - EnvironmentalSEA - Environmental ReportReport - Draft - Draft for Consultation for Consultation April 2015 Norfolk County Council County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 W www.mottmac.com Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 09.03.2015 N Levy J Fookes J Fookes Working Draft for Client Information S Palit B 07.04.2015 N Levy J Fookes J Fookes Final Draft for Consultation Information Class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. 320859/EVT/EES/002/B 07 April 2015 C:\Users\lev33720\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_EUNAPiMS\c1569161403\Norfolk LFRMS Environmental Report Draft for Consultation April 2015.docx Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation Contents Chapter Title Page Abbreviations i Glossary iii Non-Technical Summary v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 Purpose of the Assessment Stage and Environmental Report _________________________________ 1 1.3 Compliance with the SEA Directive _____________________________________________________ 1 1.4 Links with Wider Studies _____________________________________________________________ 2 1.5 Limitations of the SEA _______________________________________________________________ 3 2 SEA Process and Methodology 5 2.1 SEA Legislative Requirements and Purpose ______________________________________________ 5 2.2 SEA Process and Stages _____________________________________________________________ 5 2.2.1 SEA Process Overview ______________________________________________________________ 5 2.2.2 SEA Scoping Consultation Results _____________________________________________________ 7 2.2.3 Assessment Methodology ____________________________________________________________ 8 2.2.4 Assessment Assumptions ____________________________________________________________ 9 3 Description and Context of the Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 10 3.1 Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Context ____________________________________ 10 3.2 Norfolk LFMRS Aims and Objectives ___________________________________________________ 11 4 Stage A Scoping Summary 13 4.1 Relationship with other policies, plans and programmes ____________________________________ 13 4.2 Baseline Scoping Summary __________________________________________________________ 15 4.2.1 Future Baseline ___________________________________________________________________ 15 4.3 Key Environmental Issues and Opportunities _____________________________________________ 16 4.4 SEA Framework ___________________________________________________________________ 21 4.5 Compatibility of SEA Objectives _______________________________________________________ 25 5 Development of the Norfolk LFRMS 28 5.1 Compatibility of LFMRS Objectives and SEA Objectives ____________________________________ 28 5.2 Strategic Alternatives _______________________________________________________________ 30 5.3 Discounted Policies ________________________________________________________________ 31 6 Assessment of LFRMS Policies and Measures 33 6.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 33 320859/EVT/EES/002/B 07 April 2015 C:\Users\lev33720\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_EUNAPiMS\c1569161403\Norfolk LFRMS Environmental Report Draft for Consultation April 2015.docx Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation 6.2 Norfolk LFRMS Policies _____________________________________________________________ 34 6.2.1 Undertakings and Commitments Policies ________________________________________________ 34 6.2.2 Ordinary Watercourse Regulation Policies _______________________________________________ 35 6.2.3 Environmental Policies ______________________________________________________________ 37 6.3 Norfolk LFRMS Measures ___________________________________________________________ 38 6.3.1 Measure 1 – Understanding Catchments and Flood Risk ___________________________________ 38 6.3.2 Measure 2 – Disseminating Knowledge _________________________________________________ 40 6.3.3 Measure 3 – Partnership Coordination and Working _______________________________________ 41 6.3.4 Measure 4 – Flood Mitigation Funding __________________________________________________ 42 6.3.5 Measure 5 – Monitoring Maintenance Spend _____________________________________________ 43 6.3.6 Measure 6 – Implementation of Identified Mitigation Measures _______________________________ 44 6.3.7 Measure 7 – Delivery of Small Scale Projects ____________________________________________ 50 6.3.8 Measure 8 – Delivery of Local Risk Regulations __________________________________________ 51 6.3.9 Measure 9 – Support for Local Planning Authorities _______________________________________ 52 6.4 Amendments to Policies and Measures _________________________________________________ 53 6.5 Assessment of Amended Policies and Measures __________________________________________ 54 6.6 Cumulative Effects _________________________________________________________________ 55 7 Mitigation and Monitoring 57 7.1 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures _________________________________________________ 57 7.2 Monitoring Proposals _______________________________________________________________ 58 7.3 Links to other Tiers of Plans, Programmes and the Project Level _____________________________ 60 8 Conclusions of the SEA 62 8.1 Conclusions and Difference the SEA has made to the LFMRS _______________________________ 62 8.2 Next steps in the SEA Process ________________________________________________________ 62 8.2.1 Remaining stages of the SEA Process __________________________________________________ 62 8.2.2 Stage D: Consulting on the draft Strategy and the Environmental Report _______________________ 63 8.2.3 Completion of Stage E ______________________________________________________________ 63 9 References 64 Appendices 67 Appendix A. Scoping Consultation Results _________________________________________________________ 68 Appendix B. Plans and Programmes Review _______________________________________________________ 72 Appendix C. Baseline information _______________________________________________________________ 106 C.1 Air Quality _______________________________________________________________________ 106 C.2 Water __________________________________________________________________________ 107 C.2.1 Overview _______________________________________________________________________ 107 C.2.2 Main Rivers and Tributaries _________________________________________________________ 107 C.2.3 Main Lakes and Reservoirs _________________________________________________________ 108 C.2.4 Estuarine and Coastal Bodies _______________________________________________________ 109 C.2.5 Groundwater Bodies _______________________________________________________________ 109 C.2.6 Water Pollution Issues _____________________________________________________________ 111 320859/EVT/EES/002/B 07 April 2015 C:\Users\lev33720\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_EUNAPiMS\c1569161403\Norfolk LFRMS Environmental Report Draft for Consultation April 2015.docx Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA - Environmental Report - Draft for Consultation C.2.7 Hydrogeology ____________________________________________________________________ 114 C.2.8 Flooding ________________________________________________________________________ 114 C.2.9 Water Quality and Resources ________________________________________________________ 118 C.2.10 Flooding ________________________________________________________________________ 119 C.3 Climatic Factors __________________________________________________________________ 119 C.4 Soils ___________________________________________________________________________ 120 C.4.1 Geology ________________________________________________________________________ 120 C.4.2 Contamination ___________________________________________________________________ 122 C.5 Biodiversity, Fauna and Flora ________________________________________________________ 122 C.6 Landscape ______________________________________________________________________ 126 C.7 Cultural Heritage (architectural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 11 Minutes of the Meeting Nov 2015
    81 Northrepps PC 03 November 2015 Minutes of the Meeting of Northrepps Parish Council held on 03 November 2015 at 7.00 pm at Northrepps Village Hall Present: Chairman Cllr. A. Mackay, Vice Chairman Cllr. L. Fish, Cllr. H. Claxton, Cllr. V. Callaghan, Cllr. S. Penlington, Cllr. S. Riggott, Cllr. J. Youngman Clerk Mrs J. Warner District Cllr. Fitch-Tillet (to item 7 incl) P.C. Cresswell (to item 6 incl) Mr E. Anderson 3 members of the public 1. Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 06 October 2015 It was AGREED that the minutes of the Parish Council meeting held on 06 October 2015 be APPROVED as a true record. The minutes were signed by the Chairman. It was noted that the banking forms are still awaited from one of the new cheque signatories. 2. Apologies for absence Apologies were accepted from Cllr. Bumphrey (work commitments). Apologies were noted from County Cllr. Northam and PCSO Holmes. 3. Declarations of Interest & Dispensations in respect of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests Cllr. Riggott declared an interest in matters relating to the allotments. 4. Public Participation The members of the public did not wish to address the meeting. 5. River Mun Mr. Anderson provided an update in respect of the River Mun project and advised that Jonathan Lewis is to continue the work via a 4 year PHD project financed by the Norfolk Rivers Trust. Long term it is hoped that the quality of the lake will improve and fish can be returned. It was noted that a remembrance service is to be held and a plaque erected at Templewood to commemorate 75 years since a plane crashed at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Test Pit Excavations in Gaywood, Norfolk, in 2010-2013
    Archaeological Test Pit Excavations in Gaywood, Norfolk, in 2010-2013 Catherine Collins 1 2 Archaeological Test Pit Excavations in Gaywood, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, in 2010, 2011 and 2013 Catherine Collins 2018 Access Cambridge Archaeology Department of Archaeology University of Cambridge Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QG 01223 761519 [email protected] http://www.access.arch.cam.ac.uk/ (Front cover image: Excavation at GAY/11/2. © ACA) 3 4 Contents 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 11 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 ACCESS CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGY .................................................................................... 13 2.2 THE HIGHER EDUCATION FIELD ACADEMY (HEFA) ............................................................. 13 2.3 TEST PIT EXCAVATION AND RURAL SETTLEMENT STUDIES ..................................................... 14 3 AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND DESIRED OUTCOMES ............................................................. 15 3.1 AIMS ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 OUTCOMES ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • River Restoration and Chalk Streams
    River Restoration and Chalk Streams Monday 22nd – Tuesday 23rd January 2001 University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB Organised by the River Restoration Centre in partnership with University of Hertfordshire Environment Agency, Thames Region Report compiled by: Vyv Wood-Gee Countryside Management Consultant Scabgill, Braehead, Lanark ML11 8HA Tel: 01555 870530 Fax: 01555 870050 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 07711 307980 ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 1 Seminar Proceedings CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 3 Discussion Session 1: Flow Restoration 4 Discussion Session 2: Habitat Restoration 7 Discussion Session 3: Scheme Selection 9 Discussion Session 4: Post Project Appraisal 15 Discussion Session 5: Project Practicalities 17 Discussion Session 6: BAPs, Research and Development 21 Discussion Session 7: Resource Management 23 Discussion Session 8: Chalk streams and wetlands 25 Discussion Session 9: Conclusions and information dissemination 27 Site visit notes 29 Appendix I: Delegate list 35 Appendix II: Feedback 36 Appendix III: RRC Project Information Pro-forma 38 Appendix IV: Project summaries and contact details – listed 41 alphabetically by project name. ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 2 Seminar Proceedings INTRODUCTION Workshop Objectives · To facilitate and encourage interchange of information, views and experiences between people working with projects and programmes with strong links to chalk streams and activities or research that affect this environment. · To improve the knowledge base on the practicalities and associated benefits of chalk stream restoration work in order to make future investments more cost effective. Participants The workshop was specifically targeted at individuals and organisations whose activities, research or interests include a specific practical focus on chalk streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Northrepps House Region: Norfolk Sleeps: 8
    Northrepps House Region: Norfolk Sleeps: 8 Overview Northrepps House is a stunning, four bedroom, traditionally styled flint and brick farmhouse. With a fantastic blend of old-world charm meeting contemporary stylish living, guests will be delighted with this immaculate, spacious holiday home. Located in the pretty village of Northrepps, the house is just 2 miles from the stunning Norfolk coastline and very close to the iconic seaside town of Cromer. Cromer is famous for its pier and Pavilion Theatre where the UK’s only remaining traditional end of pier variety show takes place each summer and winter. The pier is an enduring example of Victorian architecture, having withstood many storms and tidal surges. The exterior of Northrepps House is brilliant and gives you an inkling of what to expect when you open the door. Guests are delighted with the fantastic, modern living spaces and the calm, elegant decor. Splashes of exposed flint, restored wooden beams, vaulted ceilings and stunning brick fireplaces offer a warm and inviting ambience. The brilliant white walls work as a wonderful blank canvas for modern artwork. Plush, luxury furnishings are in every room, ensuring modern comfort. Grown-ups will be drawn to the main living room with soft grey sofas and a contemporary log burner in the huge brick inglenook fireplace. Children will be delighted to have their own living room with its treasure chest of games and toys and its fabulous furnishings. The spacious kitchen diner is fantastic for entertaining in cream, white and brown tones. The well-equipped kitchen is a chef’s dream with plenty of preparation space, shiny granite worksurfaces and impressive appliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents
    LCA cover 09:Layout 1 14/7/09 15:31 Page 1 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT NORTH NORFOLK Local Development Framework Landscape Character Assessment Supplementary Planning Document www.northnorfolk.org June 2009 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Cover Photo: Skelding Hill, Sheringham. Image courtesy of Alan Howard Professional Photography © North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents 1 Landscape Character Assessment 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 What is Landscape Character Assessment? 5 2 North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment 9 2.1 Methodology 9 2.2 Outputs from the Characterisation Stage 12 2.3 Outputs from the Making Judgements Stage 14 3 How to use the Landscape Character Assessment 19 3.1 User Guide 19 3.2 Landscape Character Assessment Map 21 Landscape Character Types 4 Rolling Open Farmland 23 4.1 Egmere, Barsham, Tatterford Area (ROF1) 33 4.2 Wells-next-the-Sea Area (ROF2) 34 4.3 Fakenham Area (ROF3) 35 4.4 Raynham Area (ROF4) 36 4.5 Sculthorpe Airfield Area (ROF5) 36 5 Tributary Farmland 39 5.1 Morston and Hindringham (TF1) 49 5.2 Snoring, Stibbard and Hindolveston (TF2) 50 5.3 Hempstead, Bodham, Aylmerton and Wickmere Area (TF3) 51 5.4 Roughton, Southrepps, Trunch
    [Show full text]
  • River-Mun-Catchment-Plan.Pdf
    THE NORFOLK RIVERS TRUST RESTORING NORFOLK’S RIVERS THE RIVER MUN (OR MUNDESLEY BECK) A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction 1 The Water Framework Directive 1 This plan has been produced by Norfolk Rivers Trust in of species and habitats as well as for agricultural and A choice for the fut ure of our rivers… 2 consultation with relevant agencies, landowners, farmers drinking water abstraction. and residents in the Mun Catchment. The aim of the River Mun statistics 4 plan is to provide a framework for improvement of the The plan begins by providing an audit of the current state Why restore rivers? 4 ecological status of the Mun River (or Mundesley Beck of the catchment. Then information gathered is used as it is known by some locals), guided by the Water to identify ecological pressures in the catchment. In the Framework Directive. Delivery of the actions outlined final stages of the plan, solutions to these pressures are THE CATCHMENT in the plan will lead to improvements in water quality identified, costed and prioritised. Several projects have throughout the catchment, providing benefits for a variety elements which could be pushed forward soon with the The River Mun catchment 5 help of local support and volunteers. The Community 6 Overview of restorations options 7 Geology and geodiversity 8 Wildlife 11 THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE A history of human management and the catchment 13 The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was introduced status”, and designated as either bad, poor, moderate, The Mun from source to mouth 14 in 2000 and commits European Union member states good or high.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Yatural Area: 23. Lincolnshire Marsh and Geological Significance: Notable Coast (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the Lincolnshire Marsh and Coast Natural Area is bminated by Cretaceous chalk (approximately 97-83 Ma) although the later Quaternary deposits (the last 2 Ma) give thc area its overall. charactcr. 'The chalk is only well exposed on thc south bank of the Humber, where quarries and cuttings providc exposures of the Upper Cretaceous Chalk. 'me chalk is a very pure limestone deposited on the floor of a tropical sea. During Quaternary timcs, the area was glaciated on several occasions and as a result the area is covered by a variety of glacial deposits, representing an unknown number of glacial ('lcc Age') and interglacial phases. rhe glacial deposits consist mainly of sands, gravels and clays in variable thicknesses. These are derived primarily from the erosion of surrounding bedrock and therefore tend to have similar lithological characteristics, usually with a high chalk content. The glacial deposits are particularly important because of the controversy surrounding their correlation with the timing and sequence in other parts of England, especially East Anglia. The Quaternary deposits are well exposed in coastal cliffs of the area. Key geological features: Coastal cliffs consisting of glacial sands, gravels and clays Exposures of Cretaceous chalk Number of GCR sites: Oxfordian: 1 Kimmeridgian: I Aptian-Rlbian: i Quaternary of Eastern England: 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ GeologicaVgeomorphological SSSI coverage: 'here are 2 (P)SSSIs in the Natural Area covering 4 GCR SlLs which represent 4 different GCR networks. The site coverage includes South Ferriby Chalk Pit SSSI which contains an important Upper Jurassic succession, overlain by Cretaceous deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich
    the natural I HISTORY MUSEUM ! 4 APR 199? ncHAiue-"-! h 1i\j££>frL Lj'r^A/fT^Y' y Norfolk Bird Report - 1995 Editor: MICHAEL J. SEAGO County Recorder: MICHAEL E.S. ROONEY Assistant County Recorder: NEIL LAWTON Systematic List Compilers: P.R. ALLARD, D. APPLETON, A. BLOOMLIELD, A. BROWN, P. CLEMENT, K. DYE, V. EVE, P. FISHER, M. FISZER. P. HEATH. G. HIBBERD, J.B. KEMP, N. LAWTON, M.E.S. ROONEY, J. WILLIAMSON & M. YOUNG-POWELL Editorial 587 Review of the Year 590 Pine Bunting - A First for Norfolk 593 Breeding Waders in the Broads ESA 594 The Little Auk Wreck 600 Buzzards in Norfolk 602 Origins of Rock Pipits in Norfolk 606 County Rookery Survey 608 Wetland Bird Surveys 612 Ringed Pink-footed Geese in Norfolk 616 Contributors 620 Systematic List 622 Ringing Report 727 The feature containing selected Introductions, Hybrids, Escapes and Ferals has been held over until the next Report. Norfolk Mammal Report - 1995 Editor: MARTIN R. PERROW Editorial 735 The ‘Flattened Fauna’ Survey 736 Small Mammals in Reed-beds 738 Water Voles and Mink 742 Status of the Otter 743 Chinese Water-deer on the increase? 745 Classified List 746 Contributors 760 Published by NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS SOCIETY. Castle Museum, Norwich NR 1 3JU (Transactions Volume 30 Part 6 March 1997) ISSN 0375 7226 Keepsake back numbers are available from Mrs. M.J. Dorling, 6 New Road. Hethersett NR9 3HH. Front cover painting: Crossbills by J.C. Harrison (reproduced by courtesy C.R. Knights). Back cover photograph: Red Squirrel (D. Mason). NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 1995 Editorial Th° Coimci! of the Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society presents the annual report on the buds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Lynn Legend/Notation
    Sheet 22 Drain Drain Mud Drain Drain Drain 0043 9.38mBM Hamonds Drain Drain Track Drain 1239 River Great Ouse Track Track Drain Pond Drain Lynn Channel Mean High Water Ling Common 0036 7637 Adopted King’s Lynn & West NorfolkPond Local Plan 1998 0036 45.3m Drain Path (um) LB 13.4m Drain Drain BM 48.69m Drain Track Drain Pond 9131 El Sub Sta Black Hills 47.8m 5.5m 4.3m 4.0m 8832 Black Hills Track South Wootton Common Inset 31 Path (um) Beacon South Wootton Common 1130 3029 4828 Drain Sluice 7527 4727 Track Sloping masonry Drain Drain Drain Track 3.4m Pond9223 Track Track Drain 0022 Drain King’s Lynn Drain Drain Drain Drain Drain Drain Drain Sloping masonry 10.4m Track Pond Drain Drain Drain Drain Drain This Map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller Hamond's Drain Pillar of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may leadBM 51.22m Drain Drain 7.0m Old West Sea Bank Drain to prosecution or civil proceedings. Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk. LA086045. 1999. Pond Drain Drain Beacon 3.4m Drain 7.0m Maps produced by Lovell Johns Ltd., Oxford. England. SCALE 1:10000 2907 3.4m Path (um) 7.9m BM 14.44m OldDrain Way SubEl Sta 36.8m Old Way Drain Track 4200 3700 6800 (Drain) Drain 2700 Drain 2200 5400 6800 0003 0003 42.7m 0006 0078 0003 0003 0006 El Sub Sta8.2m 00030003 2700 5700 BM 4.03m Drain 0003 3700 6800 7.3m South Wootton 0006 4900 230 Drain Golf Course Track Drain Hamonds Drain 4.3m 50.5m
    [Show full text]