Running head: SEARCHING FOR PUTRESCINE EFFECTS 1 Not So Fast: Searching for Behavioral Effects of Putrescine in Direct and Conceptual Replications of Wisman and Shrira (2015). Michael D. Anes, Jennifer L. Gile, and Richard W. York Wittenberg University, Springfield, Ohio 1 Corresponding author: Michael D. Anes Department of Psychology Wittenberg University Springfield, Ohio 45501 USA
[email protected] Author Note: Many Wittenberg Psychology Department students helped prepare experimental materials in the initiation phase of this research and/or served as student experimenters. Their help was invaluable. They are, in alphabetical order: Danielle Balchunas, Victoria Blain, Cori Cleveland, Lacey Eigel, Emily Kahlig, Meredith Keegan, Lucas Klever, Mariah Koenig, Kellyn McCarter, Ashley Miller, Hannah Patterson, Micaela Pohlabel, Cinda Rutter, Shaye Sakos, Danielle Scott, Cameron Stout, Tyler Smith, Leah Souter, Jason Williams, Katie Williams, Hannah Wilson, and Emmitt Zalerneraitis. SEARCHING FOR PUTRESCINE EFFECTS 2 Abstract Understanding olfactory signal perception in humans is important for advancing basic scientific questions about the role of odor in cognitive and social processes. Here we review animal research on behavioral consequences of exposure to putrescine, a trace amine found in bodily tissues and which is produced by decay processes. Wisman and Shrira (2015) exposed human participants to putrescine and other aversive substance odors, gathered hedonic ratings, and reported heightened vigilance and increased threat and escape-related cognitions and behavior in putrescine conditions. In Wisman & Shrira and the present experiments, participants and experimenters were blind to substance condition. We conducted a direct replication of Wisman and Shrira’s supraliminal exposure ratings and walking speed studies (Experiments 2 and 3) and a conceptual replication of a subliminal presentation defensive threat effect found in their Experiment 4.