DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2016 to 06/30/2016 Angeles National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2016 to 06/30/2016 Angeles National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2016 to 06/30/2016 Angeles National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Angeles National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Angeles National Forest - Fuels management Completed Actual: 01/06/2015 02/2016 Diane Travis Defensible Space Project 760-249-6005 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Expanding Hazard Reduction for landowners with habitable structures within 300 feet of the forest boundary. Project will establish defensible space around structures to the extent necessary to comply with state and county fire codes. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=35149 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles, San Bernardino. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Areas of private property adjacent to National Forest System lands across the Angeles National Forest. Primarly in north cental Los Angeles County with some areas in easter San Bernardino County. Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:01/2015 05/2015 Nathan Sill Translocation into Bear Creek, Scoping Start 11/07/2014 626-574-5328 within the San Gabriel [email protected] Wilderness Area. Description: This project will involve moving frogs or tadpoles from existing populations into Bear Creek. This effort is designed CE to establish another population within the historic range of the species in order to aid in its recovery. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46095 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This project will occur within the Bear Creek drainage within the San Gabriel Wilderness of the San Gabriel River Ranger District. Plan for Invasive Plants; - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 12/02/2015 01/2016 Janet Nickerman Angeles National Forest (other than forest products) 626-353-8439 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The proposed action includes the eradication, control, containment, and/or suppression of existing and new infestations of invasive plant species, using herbicides and manual treatment methods. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46486 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. The project is in the San Gabriel Mountains and the northern section of the Sierra Pelona Mountains. Areas with existing NEPA decisions such as the Santa Clara River Watershed are excluded. 04/01/2016 04:08 am MT Page 1 of 11 Angeles National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Angeles National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region San Gabriel Mountains National - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:09/2016 10/2016 Justin Seastrand Monument Plan and Land Scoping Start 06/19/2015 626-574-5278 Management Plan Amendment Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 02/2016 Description: The Angeles National Forest (ANF) is proposing to develop a management plan for the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument as required by Presidential Proclamation. This plan will be adopted as an amendment to the existing ANF Land Management Plan Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46964 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. The project is located in the northern and southeastern portions of the San Gabriel Mountain Range, approximately 30 miles northeast of Los Angeles. Tehachapi Renewable - Special use management Completed Actual: 10/17/2014 03/2015 Lorraine Gerchas Transmission Project 626-574-5281 Supplemental EIS [email protected] EIS Description: Proposal is to implement Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommendations on an already approved *UPDATED* transmission line. On National Forest System lands, marker balls would be added to 111 wire spans, and aviation lights to 3 towers. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=41924 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Two utility corridors south of Acton, CA. One southwest toward the Gould Substation off of Highway 2 in La Canada; the other southeast toward Duarte and the Rio Hondo Substation. Angeles National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Non-Native Aquatic Species - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:09/2014 09/2014 Nathan Sill Removal in Mountain Yellow- - Fuels management Scoping Start 08/07/2014 626-574-5328 Legged Frog Habitat. - Watershed management [email protected] CE Description: This project will remove non-native aquatic species within the South Fork Big Rock Creek, Dorr Canyon, Little Rock Creek, Devils Canyon, Bear Creek, Vincent and Bear Gulch and will involve the use of nets, traps and backpack electroshockers. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=45086 Location: UNIT - San Gabriel River Ranger District, Santa Clara/Mojave Rivers. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This project will occur within the drainages described below and are located within the Pleasant View, San Gabriel, and Sheep Mountain Wilderness Areas. 04/01/2016 04:08 am MT Page 2 of 11 Angeles National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Angeles National Forest Los Angeles River (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Big Tujunga Dam and Maple - Special use management In Progress: Expected:01/2015 07/2015 Graham Breakwell Canyon Sediment Placement Notice of Initiation 05/11/2012 818-899-1900 ext. 243 Site Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 08/2014 d.us Description: LA County proposes to remove up to 4.4mm cubic yards of sediment from Big Tujunga Reservoir, and place it in the adjacent Maple Canyon, a designated disposal site. Big Tujunga Reservoir will be dewatered through dam valves and mechanical pumping. Web Link: http://ladpw.org/wrd/Removal/BigTujunga/index.cfm?Project=BigTujunga&site=wrd Location: UNIT - Los Angeles River. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Big Tujunga Dam and Maple Canyon are approximately 9 miles up Big Tujunga Canyon Road from Sunland, and 6 miles north of La Canada. CalTrans SH2 - regrading and - Special use management In Progress: Expected:02/2013 02/2013 Graham Breakwell removal of overhanging 215 Comment Period Legal 818-899-1900 unstable thick soil mantle Notice 11/15/2012 [email protected] CE d.us Description: CalTrans SH2 - regrade and remove overhanging unstable thick soil mantle. A soldier-pile debris catchment wall is proposed at the toe of the regraded slope. The proposed wall will catch the hazard falling material and prevent blockage of SH2. Location: UNIT - Los Angeles River. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Angeles Crest Highway - SH2 - MM 32.5 - South side. Angeles Crest Highway - SH2 - MM 32.5 - South side. Dawn Mine Entry Access - Minerals and Geology In Progress: Expected:08/2014 09/2014 Mike McIntyre Control Project Scoping Start 05/28/2014 818-899-1900 CE [email protected] Description: The Angeles National Forest proposes to improve public safety and comply with the direction of Forest Service Manual 2840.3 by eliminating human entry into the abandoned historic Dawn Mine. Closure methods will be selected on site-specific conditions Location: UNIT - Los Angeles River. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - The Dawn Mine is located in the SW1/4 of Section 27, T.2N, R.12W, SBBM, on the Pasadena, CA 7.5' Series Topographic Map. UTM coordinates are Zone 11, 395960E and 3787720m to 394849mN. The Dawn Mine is located in the SW1/4 of Section 27, T.2N, R.12W, SBBM, on the Pasadena, CA 7.5' Series Topographic Map. UTM coordinates are Zone 11, 395960E and 3787720m to 394849mN. 04/01/2016 04:08 am MT Page 3 of 11 Angeles National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Angeles National Forest Los Angeles River (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Little Tujunga West Fuels - Fuels management On Hold N/A N/A Scott Lowden Treatment Project 818-899-1900 CE [email protected] Description: Hazardous fuel reduction with handcrews, masticators, chipping, pile burning and broadcast burning, adjacent to LA City and LA County. This is in the Kagel and Lopez Canyon areas. Location: UNIT - Los Angeles River. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - T2N, R14 W, Sec. 5, 6; T2N, R15W, Sec.1; T3N, R14W, Sec. 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. Lopez, Kagel, and Little Tujunga Canyon areas. Los Angeles County- Big - Special use management In Progress: Expected:08/2014 10/2014 Graham Breakwell Tujunga Canyon Highway Comment Period Public Notice 818-899-1900 ext. 243 Maintenance 03/19/2014 [email protected] EA Est. Objection Period Legal d.us Notice 07/2014 Description: An unreinforced wall of 450' length and 20' high is severely eroded by constant water scouring. The proposal is to reinforce this wall with riprap. A temporary water diversion structure will be placed in the middle of the streambed to divert water. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=35963 Location: UNIT - Los Angeles River. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Big Tujunga Canyon Road MM 0.40. Pacoima Reservoir Sediment - Special use management Developing Proposal Expected:06/2015 09/2015 Graham Breakwell Removal Est. NOI in Federal Register 818-899-1900 EIS 07/2014 [email protected] d.us Description: LA County Dept.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resources of the Devil Canyon-Bear Canyon Primitive Area, California
    Mineral Resources of the Devil Canyon-Bear Canyon Primitive Area, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1230-G Mineral Resources of the Devil Canyon-Bear Canyon Primitive Area, California By DWIGHT F. CROWDER STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1230-G An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 55 cents (paper cover) STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS The Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and the Conference Report on Senate bill 4, 88th Congress, direct the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to make mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially desig­ nated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe," when the act was passed, were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System. Areas classed as "primitive" were not included in the Wilderness Sys­ tem, but the act provided that each primitive area should be studied for its suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. This bulletin reports the results of a mineral survey in the Devil Canyon-Bear Canyon primitive area, California. The area discussed in the report corresponds to the area under consideration for wilderness status. It is not identical with the Devil Canyon-Bear Canyon Primitive Area as defined because modifications of the boundary have been proposed for the area to be con­ sidered for wilderness status.
    [Show full text]
  • 1952 Threw Its Entire Resources Into the Bat­ Steep Slopes Above the Meyers Grade
    California Highways and Public Works Public Works Building Official lou'rnal of the Division of Highways, Twelfth and N Streets Department of Public Works, State of California Sacramento FRANK B. DURKEE GEORGE T. McCOY Director State Highway Engineer KENNETH C. ADAMS, Editor HELEN HALSTED, Associote Editor Published in the interest of highway development in Cali. fornia. Editors of newspopers and others are privileged to use matter contained herein. Cuts will be gladly loaned upon request. Address Communications to CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC WORKS P. O. Box 1499 Sacramento, California Vol. 31 January-February Nos. 1,2 Page Typical Snow Battle Scene on U. S. 40 During Recent Record Storm. Photo by John Shaver, Photographic Section, M. R. Nickerson, ChieL Cover Epic Battle, II lustrated___________ _ _ By N. R. Bangert, Assistont Maintenance Engineer Man vs. Snow, Illustrated _ 8 By Art Hoppe, San Francisco Chronicle Sierra Crews Fight Drifts, Illustrated _ 11 By Jack Welter, San Froncisco Examiner Christm as Gift, Illustrated _ 13 By R. C. Kennedy, Secretary, California Highway Commission Ramona Freeway, III ustrated _ 17 By B. N. Frykland, Resident Engineer Santa Ana Freeway, Illustrated _ 20 By W. L. Fahey, District Engineer Ridge Route, lIIustrated____ _ _ 25 By C. P. Montgomery, District Construction Engineer U. S. 99 Job, II Iustrated _ 29 By W. M. Nett, Resident Engineer New State Highway Through Placerville, Illustrated _ 32 By Jerome F. Lipp, Right of Way Agent Bay Bridge Refi nancing 35 Street Sweepers, II lustrated__ 36 By Norman H. Heggie, Assistont Physical Testing Engineer New Index, 11,1 ustrated_______________ _ _ 40 By Richard H.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2016 to 09/30/2016 Angeles National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2016 to 09/30/2016 Angeles National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Angeles National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:01/2017 05/2017 Nathan Sill Translocation into Bear Creek, Scoping Start 11/07/2014 626-574-5328 within the San Gabriel [email protected] Wilderness Area. Description: This project will involve moving frogs or tadpoles from existing populations into Bear Creek. This effort is designed CE to establish another population within the historic range of the species in order to aid in its recovery. *UPDATED* Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46095 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Los Angeles. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This project will occur within the Bear Creek drainage within the San Gabriel Wilderness of the San Gabriel River Ranger District. San Gabriel Mountains National - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:01/2017 02/2017 Justin Seastrand Monument Plan and Land Scoping Start 06/19/2015 626-574-5278 Management Plan Amendment Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 07/2016 *UPDATED* Description: The Angeles National Forest (ANF) is proposing to develop a management plan for the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument as required by Presidential Proclamation. This plan will be adopted as an amendment to the existing ANF Land Management Plan Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46964 Location: UNIT - Angeles National Forest All Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March
    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft City List of Projects FY 2019-20
    "DRAFT" City Submitted - Fiscal Year 2019-20 Local Streets and Roads List of Projects *Listed projects are consistent with Streets and Highways Code Sections 2030(b)(1) adn 2034(a)(1). August 2, 2019 Fiscal Year Proposed Est Senate Assembly City County Project Type Title Description Location Components Est Start Est Completion Intially Proposed Project Status Useful Life District District This project will include: Pavement Rehab/Repair (Existing), Bicycle Lane Rehab/Repair Broadway. Shore Line Dr to Otis Dr.; Broadway. Buena Vista Ave to Blanding Road Maintenance & (Existing), Paving and/or Striping Rehab/Repair (Existing Safety) | Resurfacing and repair of Ave.; Grand St. Buena Vista Ave to Fortmann Way. Alameda Alameda 19/20 New Pavement Management Construction 06/2019 11/2019 20-30 9 18 Rehabilitation street pavement and restoration of flowlines of associated curb and gutter in order to (A) Park St. Santa Clara Ave to Buena Vista Ave.; San Antonio Ave. Chestnut St to extend the life of the street and (B) improve its ridability for cyclists and motorists. Park St. This project will include: Paving and/or Striping Installation (New Safety), Bicycle Lane Road Maintenance & Washington Avenue Pavement Albany Alameda 19/20 New Rehab/Repair (Existing), Sidewalk and/or Crosswalk Rehab/Repair (Existing), Pavement Washington Avenue between San Pablo Avenue and Key Route Blvd in Albany Construction 10/2019 05/2020 10-20 9 15 Rehabilitation Restoration Project Improvement (New), ADA Curb Ramp Rehab/Repair (Existing) This project will include:
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the Liebre Mountains, Western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 18 | Issue 2 Article 15 1999 Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Boyd, Steve (1999) "Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 18: Iss. 2, Article 15. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol18/iss2/15 Aliso, 18(2), pp. 93-139 © 1999, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE LIEBRE MOUNTAINS, WESTERN TRANSVERSE RANGES, CALIFORNIA STEVE BOYD Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 N. College Avenue Claremont, Calif. 91711 ABSTRACT The Liebre Mountains form a discrete unit of the Transverse Ranges of southern California. Geo­ graphically, the range is transitional to the San Gabriel Mountains, Inner Coast Ranges, Tehachapi Mountains, and Mojave Desert. A total of 1010 vascular plant taxa was recorded from the range, representing 104 families and 400 genera. The ratio of native vs. nonnative elements of the flora is 4:1, similar to that documented in other areas of cismontane southern California. The range is note­ worthy for the diversity of Quercus and oak-dominated vegetation. A total of 32 sensitive plant taxa (rare, threatened or endangered) was recorded from the range. Key words: Liebre Mountains, Transverse Ranges, southern California, flora, sensitive plants. INTRODUCTION belt and Peirson's (1935) handbook of trees and shrubs. Published documentation of the San Bernar­ The Transverse Ranges are one of southern Califor­ dino Mountains is little better, limited to Parish's nia's most prominent physiographic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Fire Incident Update
    LAKE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/17/2020 Time: Evening Incident Information Line: (626) 574-5208 @Angeles_NF @AngelesNationalForest (323) 205-5263 @LACoFD_PIO @LACoFD Incident Media Line: (323) 347-4725 https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/6953/ Current Situation: The Lake Fire is currently 19,026 acres with 38% containment and 4,570 structures remain threatened. Mandatory evacuations are in place. The fire is burning on the Angeles National Forest near Lake Hughes and moving northwest towards 100-year-old fuels consisting of Big Cone Douglas Fir, Oak and Gray pine. The Lake Fire remains over eight miles to the northeast of Interstate 5 and southtot of Highway 138. Firefighters are facing steep and rugged terrain, high temperatures, critically dry fuels and drought stressed trees. The Lake Fire started of unknown cause on August 12, 2020 and has burned for 6 days. There has been one reportable injury to date. The right flank of the fire, just west of Lake Hughes has held for several days. Some of the areas in denser vegetation require extensive mop up. The left flank in the area of Sawmill Mountain, Burnt Peak and Little Burnt Peak is presenting the most challenging fire behavior. Containment along Pine Mountain Road will continue to be threatened by spot fires. Crews will watch for fire whirls, or fire devils, a spinning vortex column of ascending hot air and gases rising from a fire. Tonight’s virtual public meeting was live streamed on the Angeles National Forest and Los Angeles County Fire Department Facebook and Instagram pages. Participants had the opportunity to ask questions through Facebook about the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Agenda and Report Packet
    A Joint Powers Authority BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA Monday, January 25, 2021 - 1:00 PM NCTC JPA Board Meeting Virtual Zoom Board Meeting Attendee Info: Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Please click this URL to join. Please click link below to Join Virtual Zoom Board Meeting – https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83120894191?pwd=TmpWVGlqMHRzU0hmWnlYZU1zSDdlZz09 Meeting ID: 831 2089 4191 Passcode: 949130 One tap mobile +16699009128,,83120894191#,,,,*949130# US (San Jose) +13462487799,,83120894191#,,,,*949130# US (Houston) Dial by your location +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) Meeting ID: 831 2089 4191 Passcode: 949130 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbRWCbB1Ao North County Transportation Coalition JPA www.northcountytransportationcoalition.org 44933 N. Fern Avenue, c/o City of Lancaster, Lancaster CA 93534 Page 1 of 5 NCTC JPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD MEMBERS Chair, Supervisor Kathryn Barger, 5th Supervisorial District, County of Los Angeles Mark Pestrella, Director of Public Works, County of Los Angeles Victor Lindenheim, County of Los Angeles Austin Bishop, Council Member, City of Palmdale Laura Bettencourt, Council Member, City of Palmdale Bart Avery, City of Palmdale Marvin Crist, Vice Mayor, City of Lancaster Kenneth Mann, Council Member, City of Lancaster Jason Caudle, City Manager, City of Lancaster Marsha McLean, Council Member, City of Santa Clarita Robert Newman, Director of Public Works, City of Santa Clarita Vacant, City of Santa Clarita EX-OFFICIO BOARD MEMBERS Macy Neshati, Antelope Valley Transit Authority Adrian Aguilar, Santa Clarita Transit BOARD MEMBER ALTERNATES Dave Perry, County of Los Angeles Juan Carrillo, Council Member, City of Palmdale Mike Hennawy, City of Santa Clarita NCTC JPA STAFF Executive Director: Arthur V.
    [Show full text]
  • Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project Final EIS/EIR
    Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project C. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW, Forest Service, or USFWS species as described for the Project. Sensitive plants (Impact BIO-12) or invertebrates (Impact BIO-13) were not found in the disturbance area and would be subject to the same direct and indirect impacts as the Project. Implementation of Alternative 1 may result in a minor reduction in road kill to butterflies should they occur from fewer truck trips. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to southwestern pond turtles (Impact BIO-14), two-striped garter snakes (Impact BIO-15), coast range newts (Impact BIO-16), and sensitive amphibian and reptile species (Impact BIO-17) as described for the Project. Reduced water levels required to construct in July could reduce habitat for these species in the Reservoir; however, fluctuating water levels at the reservoir occur during below-normal rain years. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to burrowing owls (Impact BIO-18), special status nesting birds (Impact BIO-19), special status bats (Impact BIO-20), and other special-status mammals (Impact BIO-21, Impact BIO-22, and Impact BIO-23) or greater as described for the Project. The commencement of work on July 1 would increase the likelihood of disturbing active breeding birds or disrupt mammal denning or pupping should they occur. Implementation of the same SPCs for the Project would reduce impacts to biological resources identified under Criterion BIO 3 from Alternative 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe in Grapevine Canyon? an 1890 Plan to Enter Northern California Via Fort Tejon by Jack W.Kelly
    Santa Fe in Grapevine Canyon? An 1890 Plan to Enter Northern California via Fort Tejon By Jack W.Kelly he many stories about Santa Fe's on February 26, 1895. Construction south ation and by June, 1898 the 80.40 miles to efforts to achieve access to the Pa­ from Stockton commenced later that year Bakersfield had accomplished the creation T cific Ocean and Southern Pacific's and over 25 miles of track were in place of a competing railroad through the valley. strident efforts to deny Santa Fe that ac­ by December. By August 1896 the 123.44 The investors and shippers who owned cess have been told with so many different miles to Fresno were completed; by June, the SF&SJV Railway were not, and did not interpretations that, depending upon ones 1897 30.20 miles to Hanford were in oper- wish to be, railroad operators. Their rail- bias or loyalties, one may reach conflicting conclusions. However, there seems to be little disagreement about Southern Pacific's stranglehold on the San Joaquin Valley and the efforts of its captive customers to relieve themselves from "The Octopus," which held them captive. The recent (197 4) and perhaps most complete analysis of the Santa Fe is History ofthe Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company by Keith L. Bryant, Jr. Mr. Bry­ ant, a history professor, was given access to the files and corporate records of the Santa Fe. Beginning on page 173 he describes the frustrations of these captive customers and their decision to form The San Fran­ cisco Traffic Association in about 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019
    West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA 2480 N. Decatur Blvd., Suite 125 Las Vegas, NV 89108 (702) 534-0375 ASM Project Number 29070 West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2480 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite 125 Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 May 2019 PN 29070 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2. LITERATURE REGARDING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ............... 7 3. DEFINING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ........................................... 9 4. PREHISTORIC, PROTO-HISTORIC, AND
    [Show full text]
  • Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project Final EIS/EIR
    Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project C. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES C.9 Recreation and Land Use This section describes the impacts to land use and public recreation associated with the construction and operation of the proposed action and alternatives. The EIS/EIR considers existing and proposed land uses in addition to sensitive land uses that have the potential to be affected by the Project. Sensitive land uses include the following land use types: residences, schools, hospitals, daycare centers, retirement homes, and cemeteries. Recreational resources are also defined as sensitive land uses, as they are susceptible to disturbances (e.g., noise, traffic, dust, etc.) that could decrease or eliminate the value of the recreational experience. In general, recreational facilities (parks, open space, playgrounds, play fields, etc.), recrea- tional activities (bicycling, hiking, boating, etc.), and recreationists are considered to be sensitive receptors for purposes of this impact assessment. C.9.1 Affected Environment The proposed sediment removal at Littlerock Reservoir would be located within the Santa Clara/Mojave Rivers Ranger District of the Angeles National Forest (ANF). Truck routes for construction equipment and sediment removal would traverse federal and local jurisdictions that include National Forest System (NFS) lands, unincorporated Los Angeles County, and City of Palmdale, as shown in Figure C.9-1 (Jurisdictional Boundaries). The extent of the area to be analyzed for land use impacts is considered the Land Use Study Area [see Figure C.9-2 (Angeles National Forest Land Use Zones) and Figure C.9-3 (Land Use Designations)]. While other issue areas in this EIS/EIR may identify a Study Area with a different radius, the Land Use Study Area has been defined by the following: Land and recreation uses immediately adjacent to construction activities at Littlerock Reservoir; Land and recreation uses located along the sediment removal truck routes; and Land and recreation uses adjacent to the proposed sediment disposal sites.
    [Show full text]