DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture: Tuesday / Thursday 11:00 A.M.–12:15 P.M., Castellaw 101 Screening: Wednesday 6:00–10:00 P.M., Castellaw 101

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture: Tuesday / Thursday 11:00 A.M.–12:15 P.M., Castellaw 101 Screening: Wednesday 6:00–10:00 P.M., Castellaw 101 Baylor University ● Dept. of Communication Studies, Film & Digital Media Division ● Spring 2011 Lecture: Tuesday / Thursday 11:00 a.m.–12:15 p.m., Castellaw 101 Screening: Wednesday 6:00–10:00 p.m., Castellaw 101 Professor: Dr. James Kendrick Office: Castellaw 119 Office Hours: Monday, Wednesday 12:00–2:00 p.m. All other times by appointment Phone: 710-6061 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: http://homepages.baylor.edu/james_kendrick COURSE DESCRIPTION This course offers an institutional, aesthetic, and cultural history of motion pictures across the world, starting with the invention of moving picture technologies in the late 19th century and concluding with the ever-rising dominance of the Hollywood blockbuster and the development of digital cinema in the 21st century. In studying the history of motion pictures, we will take into account not only the major figures who influenced their development both technologically and aesthetically, but also the cultural influences, politics, and economic factors that helped shape them. We will consider the development of motion pictures as a narrative form, cultural commodity, political object, art form, and avenue of escapist entertainment. One of the keys emphases in the class will be the historical intersections of various sites of cultural production (movies, television, advertising, censorship, political propaganda, etc.) and how they influence and shape each other. Because the breadth of international film history far exceeds what can be covered in a single semester, this course will focus most heavily on the history of film in the United States, although we also look at various historical moments in the Soviet Union, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Poland. By the end of the semester, you will • understand the history of narrative film, both American and international; • understand the economic and cultural development of various film industries; • understand how different national film industries respond to social issues; and • be able to analyze the cultural, aesthetic, and historical significance of various films. REQUIRED TEXT Cook, David A. A History of Narrative Film, 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Readings: The reading load for some weeks may be fairly heavy, but it is important that you do the reading before coming to class as they will form the foundation on which lectures and discussions will be built. Any information in the assigned readings, but not covered in class, may appear on the exams. Screenings: Each Wednesday night from 6:00 to 10:00 p.m. we will screen one or more films that are relevant to the topics discussed that week. Many screening nights will be double features, so plan accordingly. Viewing these films is crucial to developing a full understanding of film history and the interrelationships among film production, social/political issues, artistic/aesthetic development, government involvement, and other external factors. Therefore, screenings are considered a class meeting and attendance will be taken. Attendance for the screenings will be taken via sign-in and sign-out sheets. Screenings start promptly at 6:00 p.m. and sign-in sheets will be taken up at that point. It is extremely disruptive to those who arrived on time when others show up late and stumble around the room looking for a seat, especially with a class of this size. Therefore, if you arrive late to the screening and have not signed in, you will be counted absent for that screening, no exceptions. Similarly, if you leave early and do not sign out at the end of the screening, you will be counted absent. Note: Some of the films we screen will contain instances of profanity, violence, and sexual situations/nudity. As adults in a university setting, I expect you to approach these films with the seriousness of any subject of study in college. If you have genuine objections to viewing such material, please come see me. 2 Expected Behavior During Screenings: ● The films we watch will often provoke various responses, which is not only acceptable, but expected. Involuntary responses such as laughter and gasps are fine, but under no circumstances should you talk during the screening. It not only distracts you, but others around you. ● Because the films we will be screening in this course are of a historical nature, certain elements of them will seem anachronistic. While there may be a tendency to laugh at the outdated elements, remember that such a response puts up a barrier to your understanding and appreciation of the film. Some such responses may be unavoidable, but you will profit from viewing the films much more if you show them the proper respect by taking into account the historical, social, and industrial contexts in which they were made. ● You should take notes during or immediately after the in-class screening. We will usually take a short break after each screening, and this is a good time to jot down your thoughts, responses, feelings, etc. so you will be better prepared to engage in class discussion. ● If you must leave during a film screening for a bathroom break or some other emergency, please be as quiet as possible when exiting the room. ● Any and all electronic devices, including iPods, PDAs, and especially cell phones, must be turned off during class. You may use a laptop during class to take notes, but it must be shut off during any in-class screenings because the light from the screen is distracting to others. Bi-Weekly Screening Responses: Every other week you are required to write a brief response to one or more of the films from the screenings of the past two weeks. The response should be no less than 300 words in length and should demonstrate a clear attempt to integrate the class screening(s) with the reading, lectures, and/or in-class discussions. That is, it should not be a listing of what you “liked” or “didn’t like” about the film. Instead, it is an opportunity for you to show me how you are connecting the films we screen with the topics we are covering in class. I will drop one screening response grade at the end of the semester, so you can miss one without penalty. You must submit your response via Blackboard no later than the beginning of class (11:00 a.m.) on the Tuesday when they’re due (see the schedule for due dates). Screening responses are not accepted late for any reason, so do not e-mail me your response late. I will not accept it. To submit your response, log in to Blackboard (http://my.baylor.edu) and click on this course. Click on “Assignments” in the lefthand column. This will bring you to the Assignments page where you should see a “View/Complete” link for that week’s screening response. Click on that link and upload your paper on the next page. 3 Attendance/Participation: Participation is essential to the learning process, so it is important that you attend class and be prepared to participate actively. The Wednesday night screenings are mandatory and are considered as part of the attendance policy; missing all or part of a screening is the same as missing a class. You are allowed a combined 4 personal/sick days to use at your discretion for the lectures and screenings (these include excused absences). You will lose 10 points off your attendance/participation grade for each additional absence. The university mandates that you attend at least 75% of all classes. Therefore, if you miss more than 10 classes, you automatically fail. If you are not in your seat at the time attendance is taken, you will be counted absent, no excuses or exceptions. In other words, if you are late, then you may be counted absent, and if you leave early, you may be counted absent. Therefore, it is imperative that you get to class on time. This goes for the screenings, as well. If you do not arrive before the screening begins at 6 p.m. and stay through the end credits of the last film screened, you will not be counted present. Exams: There will be three multiple-choice exams in this class. The questions on the exams will come from lectures, in-class discussions, in-class screenings (both features and clips), and all assigned readings. The third and final exam is not cumulative, but it will have one cumulative essay question that you will be given a week before the exam is given. Make-Up Exam Policy: The only valid excuses for missing a scheduled exam are serious illness or a death in the family. If you miss an exam for either of these reasons, you will need to let me know ahead of time, provide verifiable documentation, and schedule a make-up exam. Otherwise, there are no make-up exams for any reason. No exceptions. GRADING Your grade in this class will be based on the following: • Exam #1 250 pts. • Exam #2 250 pts. • Exam #3 250 pts. • Bi-Weekly Screening Responses 150 pts. (25 pts. each) • Attendance/Participation 100 pts. 1,000 pts. total 4 GRADE BREAKDOWN 900–1,0000 pts. = A 700–770 pts. = C 880–890 pts. = B+ 680–690 pts. = D+ 800–870 pts. = B 600–670 pts. = D 780–790 pts. = C+ 0–590 pts. = F ACADEMIC INTEGRITY In this class, there is an absolute zero tolerance policy on cheating in any form, including plagiarism. It is your responsibility to familiarize yourself with the university’s policies and what constitutes plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty in the Baylor Honor Code (http://www.baylor. edu/honorcode). If you are caught cheating in any way, at the minimum you will receive a zero for that assignment, although the penalty may be more severe, depending on the circumstances.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Academy Awards (Oscars), 34, 57, Antares , 2 1 8 98, 103, 167, 184 Antonioni, Michelangelo, 80–90, Actors ’ Studio, 5 7 92–93, 118, 159, 170, 188, 193, Adaptation, 1, 3, 23–24, 69–70, 243, 255 98–100, 111, 121, 125, 145, 169, Ariel , 158–160 171, 178–179, 182, 184, 197–199, Aristotle, 2 4 , 80 201–204, 206, 273 Armstrong, Gillian, 121, 124, 129 A denauer, Konrad, 1 3 4 , 137 Armstrong, Louis, 180 A lbee, Edward, 113 L ’ Atalante, 63 Alexandra, 176 Atget, Eugène, 64 Aliyev, Arif, 175 Auteurism , 6 7 , 118, 142, 145, 147, All About Anna , 2 18 149, 175, 187, 195, 269 All My Sons , 52 Avant-gardism, 82 Amidei, Sergio, 36 L ’ A vventura ( The Adventure), 80–90, Anatomy of Hell, 2 18 243, 255, 270, 272, 274 And Life Goes On . , 186, 238 Anderson, Lindsay, 58 Baba, Masuru, 145 Andersson,COPYRIGHTED Karl, 27 Bach, MATERIAL Johann Sebastian, 92 Anne Pedersdotter , 2 3 , 25 Bagheri, Abdolhossein, 195 Ansah, Kwaw, 157 Baise-moi, 2 18 Film Analysis: A Casebook, First Edition. Bert Cardullo. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 284 Index Bal Poussière , 157 Bodrov, Sergei Jr., 184 Balabanov, Aleksei, 176, 184 Bolshevism, 5 The Ballad of Narayama , 147, Boogie , 234 149–150 Braine, John, 69–70 Ballad of a Soldier , 174, 183–184 Bram Stoker ’ s Dracula , 1 Bancroft, Anne, 114 Brando, Marlon, 5 4 , 56–57, 59 Banks, Russell, 197–198, 201–204, Brandt, Willy, 137 206 BRD Trilogy (Fassbinder), see FRG Barbarosa, 129 Trilogy Barker, Philip, 207 Breaker Morant, 120, 129 Barrett, Ray, 128 Breathless , 60, 62, 67 Battle
    [Show full text]
  • Layout Version Gerlach
    The Brock Review Volume 10 (2008) © Brock University Greenscape as Screenscape: The Cinematic Urban Garden 1 Nina Gerlach Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Abstract : The relationship between city and garden appears in many feature films in order to visualize narrative dualisms. In particular, the character of the boundary - as a fundamental medial characteristic of gardens - determines the meaning of the represented space. According to the Western representation of ideal places and the historically-developed antagonism of city and garden, the boundary defines the latter as the diametrically opposed utopian antithesis to urban life. This antagonism is used, for example, in The Garden of the Finzi-Continis (1970) in the political context of World War II, or as in Being There (1979), embedded in a philosophical discourse centered on Voltaire and Sartre. The dystopian city of Los Angeles in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982) lacks space not only for gardens, but for any natural environment in general. The only garden that remains, exists as a kind of Paradise Lost , a placeless topos with a unicorn, banished into and limited by the world of imagination of the protagonist. As this example indicates, the cinematic garden and particularly the more specialized topic of the relationship between the garden and the city within cinema is still an under-examined realm of the research of garden history.2 In cinematic genres where the city is usually presented as the essential character -- such as in Neorealism, Film Noir, and dystopian science fiction -- garden space is hardly discovered. 3 These types of films frequently transport an extremely negative connotation of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2004/2005
    THE BFI PRESENTSANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2004/2005 WWW.BFI.ORG.UK The bfi annual report 2004-2005 2 The British Film Institute at a glance 4 Director’s foreword 9 The bfi’s cultural commitment 13 Governors’ report 13 – 20 Reaching out (13) What you saw (13) Big screen, little screen (14) bfi online (14) Working with our partners (15) Where you saw it (16) Big, bigger, biggest (16) Accessibility (18) Festivals (19) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Reaching out 22 – 25 Looking after the past to enrich the future (24) Consciousness raising (25) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Film and TV heritage 26 – 27 Archive Spectacular The Mitchell & Kenyon Collection 28 – 31 Lifelong learning (30) Best practice (30) bfi National Library (30) Sight & Sound (31) bfi Publishing (31) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Lifelong learning 32 – 35 About the bfi (33) Summary of legal objectives (33) Partnerships and collaborations 36 – 42 How the bfi is governed (37) Governors (37/38) Methods of appointment (39) Organisational structure (40) Statement of Governors’ responsibilities (41) bfi Executive (42) Risk management statement 43 – 54 Financial review (44) Statement of financial activities (45) Consolidated and charity balance sheets (46) Consolidated cash flow statement (47) Reference details (52) Independent auditors’ report 55 – 74 Appendices The bfi annual report 2004-2005 The bfi annual report 2004-2005 The British Film Institute at a glance What we do How we did: The British Film .4 million Up 46% People saw a film distributed Visits to
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Films
    NOMINATIONS AND AWARDS IN OTHER CATEGORIES FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE (NON-ENGLISH) FEATURE FILMS [Updated thru 88th Awards (2/16)] [* indicates win] [FLF = Foreign Language Film category] NOTE: This document compiles statistics for foreign language (non-English) feature films (including documentaries) with nominations and awards in categories other than Foreign Language Film. A film's eligibility for and/or nomination in the Foreign Language Film category is not required for inclusion here. Award Category Noms Awards Actor – Leading Role ......................... 9 ........................... 1 Actress – Leading Role .................... 17 ........................... 2 Actress – Supporting Role .................. 1 ........................... 0 Animated Feature Film ....................... 8 ........................... 0 Art Direction .................................... 19 ........................... 3 Cinematography ............................... 19 ........................... 4 Costume Design ............................... 28 ........................... 6 Directing ........................................... 28 ........................... 0 Documentary (Feature) ..................... 30 ........................... 2 Film Editing ........................................ 7 ........................... 1 Makeup ............................................... 9 ........................... 3 Music – Scoring ............................... 16 ........................... 4 Music – Song ...................................... 6 ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Bread Loaf School of English2016
    BREAD LOAF SCHOOL 2016 COURSE OF ENGLISH CATALOG SUMMER 2016 1 SUMMER 2016 SESSION DATES VERMONT READ THE Arrival and registration . June 21 Classes begin . June. 22 Classes end . August. 2 Commencement . August. 6 WORLD At Bread Loaf, we engage and inspire innovative thinkers who, NEW MEXICO Arrival and registration . June 18–19 through the interpretation of literary and critical texts, Classes begin . June. 20 contribute creative thought, write persuasive and original arguments, Classes end . July . 28 and use relevant emerging technologies to develop effective Commencement . July. 30 teaching and learning practices. OXFORD Arrival . June 27 Registration . June . 28 Classes begin . June. 29 IN A WHOLE Classes end . August. 5 Commencement . August. 6 NEW WAY 2 BLSE SUMMER 2016 1 WELCOME TO BREAD LOAF WHERE YOU'LL FIND ■ A community of engaged students eager to immerse themselves in rigorous graduate study with leading faculty from eminent colleges and universities across the U .S . and U .K . ■ The opportunity to work closely with faculty and fellow students . ■ Innovative, place-based learning oppor- tunities at three culturally distinctive campuses . IMMERSIVE UNIQUE INNOVATIVE The six-week summer schedule allows working Courses at Bread Loaf’s three campuses in Students have access to major libraries; state- ■ A one-of-a-kind chance to refresh and professionals to pursue graduate education. Vermont, New Mexico, and Oxford, England, of-the-art digital tools for research, writing, and recharge your imagination in a collabo- The full-time residential experience encourages link education to place and give students unpar- teaching; and membership in the nationally rative environment for six uninterrupted students to immerse themselves in curricular alleled access to diverse cultural experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Literature in the Films of Luchino Visconti
    From Page to Screen: the Role of Literature in the Films of Luchino Visconti Lucia Di Rosa A thesis submitted in confomity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.) Graduate Department of ltalian Studies University of Toronto @ Copyright by Lucia Di Rosa 2001 National Library Biblioth ue nationale du Cana2 a AcquisitTons and Acquisitions ef Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 WeOingtOn Street 305, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Otiawa ON K1AW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence ailowing the exclusive ~~mnettantà la Natiofliil Library of Canarla to Bibliothèque nation& du Canada de reprcduce, loan, disûi'bute or seil reproduire, prêter, dishibuer ou copies of this thesis in rnicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format é1ectronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation, From Page to Screen: the Role of Literatuce in the Films af Luchino Vionti By Lucia Di Rosa Ph.D., 2001 Department of Mian Studies University of Toronto Abstract This dissertation focuses on the role that literature plays in the cinema of Luchino Visconti. The Milanese director baseci nine of his fourteen feature films on literary works.
    [Show full text]
  • Lilo Linke a 'Spirit of Insubordination' Autobiography As Emancipatory
    ORBIT - Online Repository of Birkbeck Institutional Theses Enabling Open Access to Birkbecks Research Degree output Lilo Linke a ’Spirit of insubordination’ autobiography as emancipatory pedagogy : a Turkish case study http://bbktheses.da.ulcc.ac.uk/177/ Version: Full Version Citation: Ogurla, Anita Judith (2016) Lilo Linke a ’Spirit of insubordination’ auto- biography as emancipatory pedagogy : a Turkish case study. PhD thesis, Birkbeck, University of London. c 2016 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copyright law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit guide Contact: email Lilo Linke: A ‘Spirit of Insubordination’ Autobiography as Emancipatory Pedagogy; A Turkish Case Study Anita Judith Ogurlu Humanities & Cultural Studies Birkbeck College, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2016 I hereby declare that the thesis is my own work. Anita Judith Ogurlu 16 February 2016 2 Abstract This thesis examines the life and work of a little-known interwar period German writer Lilo Linke. Documenting individual and social evolution across three continents, her self-reflexive and autobiographical narratives are like conversations with readers in the hope of facilitating progressive change. With little tertiary education, as a self-fashioned practitioner prior to the emergence of cultural studies, Linke’s everyday experiences constitute ‘experiential learning’ (John Dewey). Rejecting her Nazi-leaning family, through ‘fortunate encounter[s]’ (Goethe) she became critical of Weimar and cultivated hope by imagining and working to become a better person, what Ernst Bloch called Vor-Schein. Linke’s ‘instinct of workmanship’, ‘parental bent’ and ‘idle curiosity’ was grounded in her inherent ‘spirit of insubordination’, terms borrowed from Thorstein Veblen.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Architecture and Spatial Experiences in Film
    Modern Architecture and Spatial Experiences in Film Rizka Fitri Ridayanti Advisor: Diane Wildsmith Architecture International Program Faculty of Engineering University of Indonesia ABSTRACT Architecture and film in this modern era are inseparable concerning the generation of perceptual spaces. Architecture is built in and around spaces, which may provide the setting for a film, whereas film stands as a two-dimensional medium to explore and present architecture as a narrative framework. Architecture is a fundamental component in order that film can deliver its narrative. This paper discusses how architectural representation is conveyed to encase the spatial narrative of a film and the important role they hold in conveying messages, underlying narratives, and the spatial experiences in a film. It discusses the workings of real to reel, borrowing Nezar AlSayyad‟s term in reference to the reality and the cinema, using the modern architecture in Jacques Tati‟s Playtime (1967) as a case in point. Architecture in the real and reel stand as the main focuses of this paper. Finally, it observes the concept of reel to real, how the architecture and film can affect our perspectives in life and be used as parameters for design. Keywords: architecture; architectural representation; film; narrative; space INTRODUCTION Since the late 19th century, film developed as a medium that has allowed increased awareness and appreciation of the 3D representation of architecture as well as urban spaces.1 Film captures motions, sounds, and sequential narratives of a city‟s architecture that allows an experience of 3D architectural spaces through 2D medium. No other medium has had the power to present an exploration of real or virtual 3D architectural spaces as boundlessly as film.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Outline
    Prof. Fatima Naqvi German 01:470:360:01; cross-listed with 01:175:377:01 (Core approval only for 470:360:01!) Fall 2018 Tu 2nd + 3rd Period (9:50-12:30), Scott Hall 114 [email protected] Office hour: Tu 1:10-2:30, New Academic Building or by appointment, Rm. 4130 (4th Floor) Classics of German Cinema: From Haunted Screen to Hyperreality Description: This course introduces students to canonical films of the Weimar, Nazi, post-war and post-wall period. In exploring issues of class, gender, nation, and conflict by means of close analysis, the course seeks to sensitize students to the cultural context of these films and the changing socio-political and historical climates in which they arose. Special attention will be paid to the issue of film style. We will also reflect on what constitutes the “canon” when discussing films, especially those of recent vintage. Directors include Robert Wiene, F.W. Murnau, Fritz Lang, Lotte Reiniger, Leni Riefenstahl, Alexander Kluge, Volker Schlöndorff, Werner Herzog, Wim Wenders, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Andreas Dresen, Christian Petzold, Jessica Hausner, Michael Haneke, Angela Schanelec, Barbara Albert. The films are available at the Douglass Media Center for viewing. Taught in English. Required Texts: Anton Kaes, M ISBN-13: 978-0851703701 Recommended Texts (on reserve at Alexander Library): Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing about Film Rob Burns (ed.), German Cultural Studies Lotte Eisner, The Haunted Screen Sigmund Freud, Writings on Art and Literature Siegfried Kracauer, From Caligari to Hitler Anton Kaes, Shell Shock Cinema: Weimar Cinema and the Wounds of War Noah Isenberg, Weimar Cinema Gerd Gemünden, Continental Strangers Gerd Gemünden, A Foreign Affair: Billy Wilder’s American Films Sabine Hake, German National Cinema Béla Balász, Early Film Theory Siegfried Kracauer, The Mass Ornament Brad Prager, The Cinema of Werner Herzog Eric Ames, Ferocious Reality: Documentary according to Werner Herzog Eric Ames, Werner Herzog: Interviews N.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10Pm in the Carole L
    Mike Traina, professor Petaluma office #674, (707) 778-3687 Hours: Tues 3-5pm, Wed 2-5pm [email protected] Additional days by appointment Media 10: Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10pm in the Carole L. Ellis Auditorium Course Syllabus, Spring 2017 READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY! Welcome to the Spring Cinema Series… a unique opportunity to learn about cinema in an interdisciplinary, cinematheque-style environment open to the general public! Throughout the term we will invite a variety of special guests to enrich your understanding of the films in the series. The films will be preceded by formal introductions and followed by public discussions. You are welcome and encouraged to bring guests throughout the term! This is not a traditional class, therefore it is important for you to review the course assignments and due dates carefully to ensure that you fulfill all the requirements to earn the grade you desire. We want the Cinema Series to be both entertaining and enlightening for students and community alike. Welcome to our college film club! COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will introduce students to one of the most powerful cultural and social communications media of our time: cinema. The successful student will become more aware of the complexity of film art, more sensitive to its nuances, textures, and rhythms, and more perceptive in “reading” its multilayered blend of image, sound, and motion. The films, texts, and classroom materials will cover a broad range of domestic, independent, and international cinema, making students aware of the culture, politics, and social history of the periods in which the films were produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Wenders Has Had Monumental Influence on Cinema
    “WENDERS HAS HAD MONUMENTAL INFLUENCE ON CINEMA. THE TIME IS RIPE FOR A CELEBRATION OF HIS WORK.” —FORBES WIM WENDERS PORTRAITS ALONG THE ROAD A RETROSPECTIVE THE GOALIE’S ANXIETY AT THE PENALTY KICK / ALICE IN THE CITIES / WRONG MOVE / KINGS OF THE ROAD THE AMERICAN FRIEND / THE STATE OF THINGS / PARIS, TEXAS / TOKYO-GA / WINGS OF DESIRE DIRECTOR’S NOTEBOOK ON CITIES AND CLOTHES / UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD ( CUT ) / BUENA VISTA SOCIAL CLUB JANUSFILMS.COM/WENDERS THE GOALIE’S ANXIETY AT THE PENALTY KICK PARIS, TEXAS ALICE IN THE CITIES TOKYO-GA WRONG MOVE WINGS OF DESIRE KINGS OF THE ROAD NOTEBOOK ON CITIES AND CLOTHES THE AMERICAN FRIEND UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD (DIRECTOR’S CUT) THE STATE OF THINGS BUENA VISTA SOCIAL CLUB Wim Wenders is cinema’s preeminent poet of the open road, soulfully following the journeys of people as they search for themselves. During his over-forty-year career, Wenders has directed films in his native Germany and around the globe, making dramas both intense and whimsical, mysteries, fantasies, and documentaries. With this retrospective of twelve of his films—from early works of the New German Cinema Alice( in the Cities, Kings of the Road) to the art-house 1980s blockbusters that made him a household name (Paris, Texas; Wings of Desire) to inquisitive nonfiction looks at world culture (Tokyo-ga, Buena Vista Social Club)—audiences can rediscover Wenders’s vast cinematic world. Booking: [email protected] / Publicity: [email protected] janusfilms.com/wenders BIOGRAPHY Wim Wenders (born 1945) came to international prominence as one of the pioneers of the New German Cinema in the 1970s and is considered to be one of the most important figures in contemporary German film.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 19 (February 2019), No
    H-France Review Volume 19 (2019) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 19 (February 2019), No. 25 Prakash Younger, Boats on the Marne: Jean Renoir’s Critique of Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017. xxv + 326 pp. $90.00 U.S. (cl). ISBN 978-0-253-02901-0; $38.00 U.S. (pb). ISBN 978-0-253- 02926-3. Review by Colin Davis, Royal Holloway, University of London. The back cover of Boats on the Marne describes the book as offering “an original interpretation of Jean Renoir’s celebrated films of the 1930s.” This is a bold promise given how intensely the films Renoir directed in the decade before the Second World War have been studied in both French- and English- language scholarship. The preface begins with a personal anecdote about the author’s first experience of the enigmatic power of La règle du jeu and his subsequent attempts to understand it. “Most of the critical consensus was in place,” he tells us, “[but] nobody seemed willing to take the final step and say…what the film was ultimately about” (p. xiv). Indeed, existing scholarship is accused of “unconscious evasiveness” (p. xvii). However, the introduction gives a more modest statement of the aims of the book: “This book does not purport to offer a better or more comprehensive account of Renoir’s films, French culture or politics in the 1930s, the philosophical legacies of Plato or Rousseau, or any of the other subjects it examines along the way, though it should, I hope, offer a different and liberating way of looking at all of these things….” (p.
    [Show full text]