DOCSLIB.ORG

Jack the Ripper: Tragedy in London and Triumph for Police Work

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jack the Ripper: Tragedy in London and Triumph for Police Work Jack the Ripper: Tragedy in London and Triumph for Police Work Xander Marvin Junior Division Paper Word Count: 1,979 Jack the Ripper became so well known for a couple of different reasons. One reason is that in the 1800s there was a great rise in photography and journalism. London was a major city and had at least thirteen daily newspapers that circulated throughout England as well as to the thirteen colonies. Another reason that Jack the Ripper captured people’s attention then and now is due to the gruesomeness of the murders. People had a hard time believing these things could happen. ( Jones) The newspaper reports complete with photos left little doubt in the minds of readers. Jack the Ripper began his killing spree in London starting in 1888. There were five known victims, and there were several other unsolved murders at that time that were also possible victims of his. Life in the 1800s was pretty divided, either you were rich or you were poor. Many women of the lower classes were unable to find work and had to resort to prostitution which was legal at the time. Prostitutes were ready victims for criminals since they were out at night and often did not have family to notice if they were missing. All of Jack the Ripper’s victims were prostitutes, many who were in their late 30 early 40s and well known for drinking heavily. Rings were also taken from the victims that he killed. ( FBI file) The murders struck fear in the women of London, especially those of the lower classes who had to go out at night. The first victim was Mary Ann Nichols. She died on August 31, 1888. Her throat was severely slashed, and she was disemboweled. She was discovered on B uck's Row at 3:45 AM. She had a very faint heartbeat as if she was trying to breathe. The next victim was Annie Chapman. She died on September 8th, 1888. Like Mary Ann, her throat was cut. The murderer also took her womb. Police used the press to see if anyone had knowledge of this murder including a description of the killer or knowledge of his whereabouts. Before the third victim was discovered, the killer wrote a letter to the chief of the police and signed it with his assumed name “Jack the Ripper.” He told police that he would clip the ears of the next victim and send them to the police. The third victim named Elizabeth Stride, and she died on September 30th, 1888. The killer didn’t get ears for police because it is believed the killer was interrupted during the murder. It did appear as if the ears of the victim were in the process of being cut. The police were not completely sure about the interruption, but it is thought to be true because Stride’s throat was cut rather hastily in contrast to the cuts on some of the other victims. On the same night, September 30th, the fourth victim named Catherine Eddowes was killed. Her body was severely mutilated, including her face and her uterus, and her left kidney was removed. Her face was so mutilated that they could only identify her by her apron. The killer ripped a piece from her apron and wiped her blood off his knife and hands on it. This was found by police and told police the escape route he took. Found near the piece of apron was this writing on a wall, “The juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.” Police thought that the message could hint that the killer might be Jewish or anti semitic just by the message. It is also possible that the message was on the wall long before the apron piece was dropped there. After the double murder, the chief of police got a letter from the supposed killer prior to any news release, and it went into lots of detail about the twin killings. It was believed that this must have been the killer. The final victim named Mary Jane Kelly died on November 9th, 1888, in her home. Her body was said to be virtually skinned down. Some of her body parts were removed and placed around in different parts of the room. Some believe that the reason this woman was mutilated this badly was to say that this would be the last murder so it would be the worst out of all of the murders. It is widely recognized that there was great incompetence by the police in the Ripper investigation. One thing that police didn’t do in the 1880s was use the forensic science of the time to help them solve the case. They also didn’t regularly use fingerprinting though it was suggested later that if they had used fingerprints, they would have got a conviction. The police also usually took pictures of the victims. They did not, however, take pictures of the crime scene. They also could have brought bloodhounds to see if they could get a scent for him. (Jones) Additionally, although the killer sent items and letters to the police, they did not use these successfully to any advantage. Nor is it believed that they did a thorough search for possible witnesses that could have provided a good description of a potential killer. ( Casebook, Ryder) The reason why these murders were different was because of how badly he mutilated the bodies. The killer was a person who had anatomical knowledge, knowledge of how to evade the police and became one of the most well known serial killers in history. People at the time thought that Jack the Ripper was a person who was perfectly sane but capable of true evil. The initial investigator on the Ripper case, quit instantly due to the horrors of the first murder. Howard Vincent, the next main investigator,resigned when his home office was blown up. Jack the Ripper inspired the police commissioners to leave after the murder occurred and during the murders as well. ( Jones). Poor investigation tactics and inconsistency in the investigation made it unlikely a perpetrator would be found. Since the 1880s however, people have continued to try to solve this case. Four suspects are most often identified as likely perpetrators. The first suspect was Queen Victoria’s Grandson Prince Albert Victor, a man of high profile. He was not suspected until long after the crimes because his status protected him from accusations. One reason that he is suspected of the killings was that he would have been protected by his servants and family if there was any evidence of his guilt. Another reason he is a likely suspect was that he had a baby with a local woman, and when the Queen heard of this, she said that anyone who knew about the child should be killed. This makes historians suspect that the “canonical five” victims may have been people who knew about the baby. Prince Albert Victor is also a suspect because he contracted syphilis and was suffering its effects including “madness.” Additionally, prostitutes were known for carrying syphilis, a sexually contracted disease. It is believed that his family knew that he was the killer after the second murder but there was no attempt to restrain him from killing until after the double event (Stride and Eddowes), when he was finally put in a mental hospital. Historians have a theory that the Prince later escaped to carry out the final murder because notes were found from his doctor indicating that he had been able to escape from the hospital during this time. The official story from the Queen and Royal family was that the Prince wasn’t in London during the time of the killings. ( Casebook, Ryder) Another possible suspect is Joseph Barnett. He wasn’t suspected of the killings until 1970 when a man named Bruce Paley (an author that had published his book in 1995) told some of his colleagues about him. He fit the profile of Jack the Ripper. He is suspected of the killings because he was in love with Mary Kelley (the final victim) and he used to visit her often and used to live with her. He used to give her money so she didn’t have to go to prostitution. But once he lost in job in June 1888 ,as a fish porter, she had to go to prostitution. So when she had to go to the streets, he wanted to scare her off the streets so he killed all of those prostitutes. But when she kept going to the streets, he went mad and killed her. This is a possible reason the killings stopped ­­ because of his link to her. The police interviewed him for four hours and they seemed satisfied with his testimony and didn’t interview him further. ( Casebook, Ryder) Another suspect is James Maybrick. He was a cotton merchant and he didn’t live in London, but all of the killings happened on a weekend. If you were a cotton merchant you were allowed to travel on the weekends. His diary and his watch were found under the floorboards of his house. "I give my name that all know of me, so history do tell, what love can do to a gentle man born. Yours truly, Jack the Ripper." That is a quote from his diary. It is still believed that this is a hoax because in the diary there is a page about the Mary Kelley murder but some of the details are completely wrong.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jack the Ripper: the Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society
    Jack the Ripper: The Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society Michael Plater Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 18 July 2018 Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines late nineteenth-century public and media representations of the infamous “Jack the Ripper” murders of 1888. Focusing on two of the most popular theories of the day – Jack as exotic “alien” foreigner and Jack as divided British “gentleman” – it contends that these representations drew upon a series of emergent social and cultural anxieties in relation to notions of the “self” and the “other.” Examining the widespread contention that “no Englishman” could have committed the crimes, it explores late-Victorian conceptions of Englishness and documents the way in which the Ripper crimes represented a threat to these dominant notions of British identity and masculinity. In doing so, it argues that late-Victorian fears of the external, foreign “other” ultimately masked deeper anxieties relating to the hidden, unconscious, instinctual self and the “other within.” Moreover, it reveals how these psychological concerns were connected to emergent social anxieties regarding degeneration, atavism and the “beast in man.” As such, it evaluates the wider psychological and sociological impact of the case, arguing that the crimes revealed the deep sense of fracture, duality and instability that lay beneath the surface of late-Victorian English life, undermining and challenging dominant notions of progress, civilisation and social advancement. Situating the Ripper narrative within a broader framework of late-nineteenth century cultural uncertainty and crisis, it therefore argues that the crimes (and, more specifically, populist perceptions of these crimes) represented a key defining moment in British history, serving to condense and consolidate a whole series of late-Victorian fears in relation to selfhood and identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture
    Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture Top Hat, Gladstone Bag and Fog Clare Smith General Editor: Clive Bloom Crime Files Series Editor Clive Bloom Emeritus Professor of English and American Studies Middlesex University London Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fi ction has never been more popular. In novels, short stories, fi lms, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fi ction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fi ction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/[14927] Clare Smith Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture Top Hat, Gladstone Bag and Fog Clare Smith University of Wales: Trinity St. David United Kingdom Crime Files ISBN 978-1-137-59998-8 ISBN 978-1-137-59999-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59999-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016938047 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 The author has/have asserted their right to be identifi ed as the author of this work in accor- dance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper
    Year 8 Home Learning, January 2021 (Jack the Ripper) th Lesson 2: What was Whitechapel like in the 19 ​ Century? ​ LO: To be able to explain what the conditions of Whitechapel, London were like at the time of the Ripper murders. Success criteria: ❑ I can describe the events of the Jack the Ripper case. ❑ I can explain what it was like in Whitechapel in the 1800s ❑ I can analyse why these conditions might have had an impact on the Jack the Ripper case. Suggested video links: ● (Jack the Ripper story): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofnp-zucJxE ​ th ● (18 ​ Century Whitechapel): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQQCBZdnkdY ​ ​ Key takeaway knowledge: • East end London was poor • Whitechapel in the east end was extremely poor • People lived in cramped housing • There was lots of crime • Life was extremely difficult Year 8 Home Learning, January 2021 (Jack the Ripper) Main activity Summarise the story of the murders by summarising each paragraph in 1-2 bullet points on the right-hand side, then give each paragraph a title on the left-hand side. Paragraph The story of Jack the Ripper from the BBC Summarise in 1 title or 2 bullet points. The identity of the killer of five - or possibly six - women in the East End of London in 1888 has remained a mystery, but the case has continued to horrify and fascinate. Between August and November 1888,the Whitechapel area of London was the scene of five brutal murders. The killer was dubbed 'Jack the Ripper'. All the women murdered were prostitutes, and all except for one - Elizabeth Stride - were horribly mutilated.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechapel's Wax Chamber of Horrors, 1888
    Whitechapel’s Wax Chamber of Horrors, 1888 By MIKE HAWLEY A waxwork ‘chamber of horrors’1 museum exhibiting ‘vilely executed waxen figures’2 of the most notorious homicides of Victorian times operated in 1888 at just a few minutes’ walking distance from the location of the Mary Ann Nichols murder scene. The museum’s main attraction were images of the Ripper victims which were added to the display as they were murdered! By February 1889, the museum displayed a total of six images of the murdered women,3 beginning with the unfortunate Martha Tabram, who had met her death on 7 August 1888. In his 1892 memoirs, Worship Street Police Court Magistrate Montague Williams recalled his walk through this chamber of horrors in early September 1888: There lay a horrible presentment in wax of Matilda Turner [Martha Tabram], the first victim, as well as one of Mary Ann Nichols, whose body was found in Buck’s Row. The heads were represented as being nearly severed from the bodies, and in each case there were shown, in red paint, three terrible gashes reaching from the abdomen to the ribs.4 Not only did the proprietor of the waxwork museum operate a chamber of horrors, but he also offered live entertainment nightly in the adjacent building.5 Ever cognizant of the money-making formula consisting of, first, satisfying the public’s desire for vice - in this case violence against women – and, secondly, adding a pinch of sex, the proprietor had as the main attraction of the show a tough young lady named Miss Juanita.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalley Quinci Jack the Ripper
    Jack the Ripper BY: QUINCI DALLEY Who was Jack the Ripper u Was an unidentified serial killer u He terrorized the impoverished towns of London in1888 u Nicknamed the Whitechapel Murderer and the Leather Apron When u Terrorized the streets of London in 1888 u First Murder: August 7th u Last: September 10th Victims u Typically female prostitutes from the slums of London u Young to middle age women u At least five women Victims u Mary Ann Nichols u Annie Chapman u Elizabeth Stride u Catherine Eddowes u Mary Jane Kelly u Known as the Canonical 5 How Women Were Killed Slit their throats Removed the internal organs from at least three women Murders u Conducted late at night u Typically close to the end of each month u Murders became more brutal as time went on Investigation u A large team of policemen went from house to house to investigate throughout Whitechapel u They followed the same steps as modern police work u More than 2,000 people were interviewed u About 300 people were investigated u 80 people were detained u But they never found the perpetrator Suspects Since 1888 100 suspects have been named Making Jack the Ripper and his legacy live on Walter Sickert u Many different theories about Jack the Ripper’s identity were brought forth u One being Victorian Painter Walter Sickert u Polish Migrant u Grandson to Queen Victoria Letters u Letters were allegedly sent from the killer to the London Police u These were to taunt the officers u Talked of gruesome actions and more murders to come Letters u The name “Jack the Ripper” came from the
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper the Massacre of London
    Jack the Ripper The Massacre of London “Jack the Ripper” was the world’s first famous serial killer, who killed five prostitutes in England’s capital London more than a hundred years ago. In those days, London was still the biggest city of the world, and the “East End”, where the murders took place, was the hugest slum of England’s capital. London’s “East End” was known for the place where prostitutes and poor people lived in tiny little streets. It was a rather unpleasant place to live; unemployment and low wages brought poverty and homelessness, and a general feeling of desperation provoked the air. Robbery and assault were commonplace, and gangs ruled the streets. It was the murderer Jack the Ripper, who managed to scare London’s inhabitants to death for about three months. At that time, the fatal disease “pest” was the reason why so many people lost their lives. The murders happened between the sixth of August and the ninth of November, every time at night between eleven o’clock and four o’clock in the morning; his victims were only women who sold their bodies to men in the streets, called prostitutes. The whole Jack-the-Ripper-Story began on Friday, 31st August 1888, when the dead body of the first acknowledged Ripper victim was found in London’s East End. It was a woman called Mary Ann Nichols, also known as Polly, who worked as a prostitute and lived from 1845-1888. After having had a drink in the pup “Frying Pan” in Brick Lane / Whitechapel in the early morning of 31st August 1888, Polly left this place at about 0:30a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper and the East End According to the 1881 Census, Over One Million People Lived in London’S East End, with up to One Third Living in Poverty
    Jack the Ripper and the East End According to the 1881 census, over one million people lived in London’s East End, with up to one third living in poverty. For those living outside the area, the East End was regarded as an ‘alien place’ full of poverty and crime. Two out of every ten children died, and diseases like tuberculosis, rickets and scarlet fever were very common. The life expectancy of an East End labourer was less than 19 years. However, for many families, the East End was also a place of safety, particularly for the large numbers of eastern European Jewish refugees fleeing economic hardship and persecution. Others also settled in the area, including Irish dockers and Asian and Chinese seamen. It was here that Jack the Ripper murdered at least five women in 1888, disappearing into the alleys of the East End and baffling police. Why were living conditions so bad in the East End? This hand-coloured map, showing part of the East End, was published as part of an investigation into the conditions of the working classes in London. Charles Booth began his survey into London life and labour in 1886. His research began in the East End as it was ‘supposed to contain the most destitute population in England and to be, as it were, the focus of the problem of poverty’. The maps were known as the Descriptive Maps of London Poverty. The colour code shows levels of poverty and wealth. Section 28, shown here, covers Spitalfields, Wapping and Whitechapel. There were seven colours in the code, ranging from black (Lower class.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Ann Nicholls: “Polly”
    Mary Ann Nicholls: “Polly” Age Features Born on August 26, 1845 in 5'2" tall; brown eyes; dark Dawes Court, Shoe Lane, off complexion; brown hair Fleet Street. turning grey; five front teeth At the time of her death the East missing; two bottom-one top London Observer guessed her front, her teeth are slightly age at 30-35. discoloured. She is described At the inquest her father said as having small, delicate "she was nearly 44 years of age, features with high cheekbones but it must be owned that she and grey eyes. She has a small looked ten years younger." scar on her forehead from a childhood injury. Lifestyle She is described by Emily Holland as "a very clean woman who always seemed to keep to herself." The doctor at the post mortem remarked on the cleanliness of her thighs. She is also an alcoholic. In 1882, William (Polly’s husband) found out that his wife was living as a prostitute and discontinued support payments to her. He won his case after establishing that she was living as a common prostitute. At the time of her death, he had not seen his wife in three years. On 12/2/87 It is said that she was caught "sleeping rough (in the open)"The in Trafalgar Night Square.of the She Crime: was found Thursday, to be destitute August and with no means of sustenance and was sent on to Lambeth Workhouse. 30 through Friday, August 31, 1888. The rain was sharp and frequent and was accompanied by peals of thunder and flashes of lightning.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechapel 14
    Whitechapel 14 To know the role of the press in the Whitechapel investigation During the Whitechapel murders those in charge of the police seemed to be in chaos. Two chief inspectors had resigned in little more than two years, after corruption scandals and riots, which the papers had reported in great detail. James Monro, the head of the CID, had just quit before the first Ripper victim was killed which left a huge gap needing to be filled. The newspapers used all of this against the police and the fact that they could not capture ‘the Ripper’ confirmed to a lot of people that the police couldn’t do their jobs properly, even though they were working really hard to catch him. Sensational stories The Ripper murders were a chance for the Read through the information, newspapers to make more money by selling more highlight specific factual detail copies. There was fierce competition between the (sfd) then explain how sensational 13 morning newspapers, and 9 evening stories would make it harder to newspapers which were selling newspapers daily catch Jack the Ripper. around London. This led to stories which sensationalised the details of the murders, making things seem more interesting and sometimes even just making things up. Some sources quote as many as 11 or more Ripper victims, saying that some murder victims were the Rippers even though they were not similar in their methods at all. The police did not give the press very much information about the murders, only enough to help identify the victims. Journalists had to rely on speaking to people that gathered when the body had been found.
    [Show full text]
  • VICE Studios UK Producing New Historical Crime Doc for Channel 5
    VICE Studios UK producing new historical crime doc for Channel 5 London. Thursday, 17th September. VICE Studios, the global production and distribution ​ division of VICE Media Group (VMG), is set to produce a new three part documentary series, Jack the Ripper: Hidden Victims (w/t), for Channel 5 in the UK, providing a new take on ​ historical crime documentaries and debunking the myths and mistruths around the infamous murderer Jack the Ripper. Across three episodes (3x60’), three experts - a historian, a forensic psychologist and an expert in policing methods - will re-examine the five horrific murders through a modern lens, uncovering new insights into what happened to the women at the hands of the brutal historical serial killer. From a modern-day incident room, the three experts will re-examine evidence from the 1800s as well as providing new perspective and context into Victorian London in the style of a live linear investigation. Jack the Ripper: Hidden Victims (w/t), which airs on Channel 5 ​ ​ later this year, will detail the lives and deaths of the very real women who were horrifically murdered by Jack the Ripper and are all too often forgotten: Mary “Polly” Ann Nichols; Annie Chapman; Elizabeth Stride; Catherine Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly. Yonni Usiskin, Creative Director at VICE Studios UK, said: “Jack the Ripper may be an ​ ​ internationally infamous figure but the real victims have been relegated to a footnote in history. VICE’s documentary offers a new take on the Ripper myth, uncovering new revelations and retelling the familiar story in a new and contemporary way.” Co-Executive Producer at VICE Studios, Lexi Rose, added: “By placing the victims at the heart of the programme, alongside the use of expert analysis and insight, the documentary will give viewers a modern, compelling and engaging take on a well known historic crime in a way only VICE can do.” The true crime-style documentary will go into production this month with filming taking place in locations across London.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming Jack the Ripper Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    NAMING JACK THE RIPPER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Russell Edwards | 336 pages | 09 Sep 2014 | ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD | 9781493011902 | English | Guilford, United States Naming Jack the Ripper PDF Book Pearcey's attorney attempted to prove that she was mentally ill. Kosminski was so fearful of food that was offered to him that he preferred to eat morsels that had dropped on the ground. I've gained a few items pertaining to the movie, but I would like more, because you can never have too much. He theorises that perhaps the shawl was the property of Emma Smith who used it to stem her bleeding after she was the victim of a brutal attack; an attack in which she sustained fatal injuries. He constructed an entire edifice in which the shawl assumes a huge significance for a recent Jewish immigrant around the Christian festival of Michaelmas, and its alleged economic importance in the East End of Cream Escaped Two Murder Convictions Due to multiple run-ins with the law, Cream moved between Canada, the United States and England, typically setting up shop as an abortionist in seedy areas. Holmes and Jack the Ripper are the same. In this book I make the case that a close relative of the Post- Impressionist artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec took the law into their own hands when they discovered the artist was dying of syphilis. The police were eventually able to tie the doctor to the murders when Scotland Yard surveilled Cream and learned that he frequently met with prostitutes. Coverage like this extended to newspapers around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Jack the Ripper?(A Worksheet)
    Skyteach.ru Who was Jack the Ripper? (a worksheet) Activity 1. Introduction Read the introduction to the webquest and find the key information. The identity of the killer of five - or possibly six - women in the East End of London in 1888 has remained a mystery, but the case has continued to horrify and fascinate. Between August and November 1888, the Whitechapel area of London was the scene of five brutal murders. The killer was dubbed 'Jack the Ripper'. All the women murdered were prosti- tutes, and all except for one - Elizabeth Stride - were horribly mutilated. After the largest criminal manhunt in British history, the police had interviewed over 8,000 people, shortlisting over 300 suspects and detaining 95 others. Eventually, the London police force conceded that they were never going to catch the elusive fiend. 130 years and hours of careful study and research later, most historians have outlined the five most candidates most likely to be Jack the Ripper. Activity 2. Suspects Read about Jack the Ripper suspects and do the tasks below. Go to https://thejacktherippertour.com/blog/top-five-jack-ripper-suspects/ 1. Make a list of suspects and the reasons why they can be the serial killer. What suspect do you think was Jack the Ripper? Why? 2. Vote for the “best” candidate on the webpage https://www.jack-the-ripper.org/vote.htm and see the chart with results. Photos taken from https://bbc.com Created by Yuliia Belonog for Skyteach, 2018 © Skyteach.ru Activity 3. Jack the Ripper's’ victims Complete the text with the necessary facts.
    [Show full text]