DOCSLIB.ORG

Jack the Ripper the Massacre of London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jack the Ripper the Massacre of London Jack the Ripper The Massacre of London “Jack the Ripper” was the world’s first famous serial killer, who killed five prostitutes in England’s capital London more than a hundred years ago. In those days, London was still the biggest city of the world, and the “East End”, where the murders took place, was the hugest slum of England’s capital. London’s “East End” was known for the place where prostitutes and poor people lived in tiny little streets. It was a rather unpleasant place to live; unemployment and low wages brought poverty and homelessness, and a general feeling of desperation provoked the air. Robbery and assault were commonplace, and gangs ruled the streets. It was the murderer Jack the Ripper, who managed to scare London’s inhabitants to death for about three months. At that time, the fatal disease “pest” was the reason why so many people lost their lives. The murders happened between the sixth of August and the ninth of November, every time at night between eleven o’clock and four o’clock in the morning; his victims were only women who sold their bodies to men in the streets, called prostitutes. The whole Jack-the-Ripper-Story began on Friday, 31st August 1888, when the dead body of the first acknowledged Ripper victim was found in London’s East End. It was a woman called Mary Ann Nichols, also known as Polly, who worked as a prostitute and lived from 1845-1888. After having had a drink in the pup “Frying Pan” in Brick Lane / Whitechapel in the early morning of 31st August 1888, Polly left this place at about 0:30a.m. Mary Ann Nichols had the intention to pass the night in “Thrawl Street Nr. 18”, but she was rejected. 2:30a.m. was probably the last time when the prostitute was seen; Polly met another prostitute at about 2:30a.m. and told her that she had to look for clients again. The church’s bell rang 2.45a.m.; this was the time when Mary Ann Nichols probably met her murderer on her way towards “Buck’s Row”. Jack the Ripper and Polly went from “Whitechapel High Street” through “Buck’s Row”, which is called “Dunard Street” today. This was the place where the murderer strangled the prostitute and cut her throat to the spine; he also lacerated her abdomen. At approximately 3:40a.m. a Carmen called Charles Cross and a man called “Robert Paul” found the prostitute’s body with the skirt pulled up. It did not take a long time until the police found the first suspect: a Jewish shoemaker called John Pizer, who was also mentioned after the next Jack the Ripper murder. The chase began. Annie Chapman is the name of the second acknowledged Jack the Ripper victim. Her nickname was “Dark Annie”, a prostitute, who lived from 1841-1888. At the time of her death, she was undernourished, with chronic diseases of the lungs and brain membranes, which would long before have killed her. Annie Chapman’s dead body was found on the 8th September 1888 in Hanbury Street. 3:30a.m. was probably the last time the prostitute called “Dark Annie“ was seen. After heaving left her place for earning some more money, she was seen by a woman while talking to a foreign man on the pavement outside “29 Hanbury Street”. From that place, both disappeared in a narrow street behind. That’s exactly the place where Jack the Ripper left his second victim after having cut the throat and mutilated the prostitute’s body in a terrible manner. Another terrible and frightening fact is that the killer also removed the uterus from the abdomen, in an extremely brutal way. It was again a carmen, who discovered the second Jack the Ripper victim, a man called John Davis. At about 6:00a.m., Mr. Davis found the prostitute `s body lying on the back, with the dress pulled above the knees. It is important to mention that “Dark Annie’s” intestines were placed across her left shoulder. Another interesting thing is that the detectives found a folded and saturated leather apron; the connection to the suspect of the first murder, John Pizer, was established. The night of the 29th September 1888 was the special night where the murderer Jack the Ripper committed an extremely terrible and frightening double murder. The first victim of that night and Jack the Ripper’s third victim in general was the prostitute Elizabeth Stride, who lived from 1843-1888. She was also called “Long Liz”. It was at about 11:00p.m. when the two workmen saw Elizabeth Stride leaving “The Bricklayers` Arms”, a nice little pup in Settles Street. Long Liz was not alone; a young man, who looked a bit like a clerk, accompanied the prostitute. The woman and the man both went in the direction of “Commercial Road” and “Berner Street” where a bit later an old man sold half a pound of black grapes to the man accompanying Elizabeth Stride. Another man saw how the man who accompanied Long Liz assaulted her several times and threw her to the pavement in a very shocking way. At about 1:00a.m., Louis Diemschutz found the dead body of the prostitute at a place called “Duffield’s Yard/Berner Street”. People think that Mr. Diemschutz probably disturbed the murderer, because the young Woman’s throat had been cut so recently. Less than an hour after having found Elizabeth Stride’s dead body, the corpse of another prostitute called Catherine Eddows was discovered in “Mitre Square”, not far away from Duffield’s Yard /Berner Street. Jack the Ripper’s fourth acknowledged victim lived from 1842-1888 and probably left the police station of “Bishopsgate” at the same time the murderer escaped from the place where Long Liz was found. Catherine Eddows had been arrested by the police before due to public offence. Joseph Lawende was probably the last person who saw this prostitute alive. This was at about 1:35a.m. when talking to a man. At approximately 1:45a.m., Police Constable “Edward Watkins” found Miss Eddow’s dead body. The victim had been ferociously attacked, especially around the face and abdomen, with some of her internal organs, like the uterus, removed. The fifth and last acknowledged Ripper victim is called Mary Jane Kelly, the prettiest and also youngest of all the killed women. This prostitute lived from 1863- 1888 and was murdered in her lodgings at “13 Miller’s Court” on the ninth of November1888. It was the most gruesome and frightening attack of all the murders. Miss Kelly’s body was horribly mutilated, her face hacked beyond recognition and her heart was lacking. After having spent the early evening of Thursday 8th November with her friend Lizzie Albrouk in a pub called “Britannia”, Mary Jane returned home. 2:00a.m. was probably the last time this young prostitute was seen; a man called George Hutchinson et her on her way towards “Thrawl Street” to pick up a client; Mary returned with a man, and they were both seen going into the prostitute’s room. A man called Thomas Bowyer found Miss Kelly’s dead body at about 10:45a.m. on 9th November 1888. Who could have been Jack the Riper? –that is the question- over the years, there has been much speculation about the horrible murderer’s identity; the Whitechapel murderer was never found. The police claims that the murderer must have definitely had medical knowledge on a high standard due to the way he killed the five prostitutes; you can say, that he dissected them. Let me present you the most favourite suspect. James Maybrick was a well known cotton merchant from Liverpool. He didn’t live In a happy marriage because his wife was not faithful to him. Some people said, that he left signs at the sites of the crime, so he became the most favourite suspect. Jack the Ripper The massacre of London James Maybrick Mary Ann Nicholls Annie Chapman Elizabeth Stride Catherine Eddows Mary Jane Kelly Jack the Ripper The massacre of London Questions How many victims demanded Jack the Ripper? Which disease was the reason why so many people lost their lives? Which year does the murders took place? Who is the most favourite suspect? Tell me one name of a victim. Vocabulary massacre Blutbad Jewish jüdisch huge ungeheuer; riesig chase Jagd, Verfolgung unemployment Arbeitslosigkeit undernourished unterernährt low wage niedriger (Arbeits-) membrane Membrane, Lohn Häutchen poverty Armut mutilate verstümmeln desperation Verzweiflung manner Art, Weise provoke reizen, uterus Gebärmutter herausfordern expose aussetzen robbery Raub intestines Darm, Eingeweide assault Angriff folded gefaltet commonplace alltäglich saturated durchtränkt manage to fertigbringen leather apron Lederschutzblech disease Krankheit accompanied begleitet victim Opfer grape Weintraube acknowledge anerkennen, corpse Leiche bestätigen ferociously grausam intention Absicht, Vorsatz lodging Unterkunft reject zurückweisen; lack fehlen abschlagen dissect zerlegen strangle erwürgen due to wegen throat Kehle, Gurgel public offense öffentliches spine Wirbelsäule Vergehen lacerate zerfleischen abdomen Unterleib carmen Fuhrmänner suspect Verdächtiger .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jack the Ripper: the Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society
    Jack the Ripper: The Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society Michael Plater Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 18 July 2018 Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines late nineteenth-century public and media representations of the infamous “Jack the Ripper” murders of 1888. Focusing on two of the most popular theories of the day – Jack as exotic “alien” foreigner and Jack as divided British “gentleman” – it contends that these representations drew upon a series of emergent social and cultural anxieties in relation to notions of the “self” and the “other.” Examining the widespread contention that “no Englishman” could have committed the crimes, it explores late-Victorian conceptions of Englishness and documents the way in which the Ripper crimes represented a threat to these dominant notions of British identity and masculinity. In doing so, it argues that late-Victorian fears of the external, foreign “other” ultimately masked deeper anxieties relating to the hidden, unconscious, instinctual self and the “other within.” Moreover, it reveals how these psychological concerns were connected to emergent social anxieties regarding degeneration, atavism and the “beast in man.” As such, it evaluates the wider psychological and sociological impact of the case, arguing that the crimes revealed the deep sense of fracture, duality and instability that lay beneath the surface of late-Victorian English life, undermining and challenging dominant notions of progress, civilisation and social advancement. Situating the Ripper narrative within a broader framework of late-nineteenth century cultural uncertainty and crisis, it therefore argues that the crimes (and, more specifically, populist perceptions of these crimes) represented a key defining moment in British history, serving to condense and consolidate a whole series of late-Victorian fears in relation to selfhood and identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly
    February/March 2018 No. 160 PAUL WILLIAMS on The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly STEPHEN SENISE JAN BONDESON HEATHER TWEED NINA and HOW BROWN VICTORIAN FICTION THE LATEST BOOK REVIEWS Ripperologist 118 January 2011 1 Ripperologist 160 February / March 2018 EDITORIAL: CHANGING FASTER NOT BETTER? Adam Wood THE WELSHMAN WHO KNEW MARY KELLY Paul Williams GEORGE WILLIAM TOPPING HUTCHINSON: ‘TOPPY’ Stephen Senise FROM RIPPER SUSPECT TO HYPERPEDESTRIAN: THE STRANGE CAREER OF BERESFORD GREATHEAD Jan Bondeson LULU - THE EIGHTH WONDER OF THE WORLD Heather Tweed WOMAN’S WORK: AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF CAPTURING THE WHITECHAPEL MURDERER PART TWO Nina and Howard Brown VICTORIAN FICTION: THE WITHERED ARM By THOMAS HARDY Eduardo Zinna BOOK REVIEWS Paul Begg and David Green Ripperologist magazine is published by Mango Books (www.mangobooks.co.uk). The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist Ripperologist, its editors or the publisher. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team, but are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of doWe not occasionally necessarily use reflect material the weopinions believe of has the been publisher. placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 160, February / March 2018, including the compilation of all materials and the unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2018 Ripperologist/Mango Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitre Square Revisited News Reports, Reviews and Other Items Are Copyright © 2009 Ripperologist
    RIPPEROLOGIST MAGAZINE Issue 104, July 2009 QUOTE FOR JULY: Andre the Giant. Jack the Ripper. Dennis the Menace. Each has left a unique mark in his respective field, whether it be wrestling, serial killing or neighborhood mischief-making. Mr. The Entertainer has similarly ridden his own mid-moniker demonstrative adjective to the top of the eponymous entertainment field. Cedric the Entertainer at the Ryman - King of Comedy Julie Seabaugh, Nashville Scene , 30 May 2009. We would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance given by Features the following people in the production of this issue of Ripperologist: John Bennett — Thank you! Editorial E- Reading The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed Paul Begg articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist are those of the authors and do not necessarily Suede and the Ripper reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of Ripperologist or Don Souden its editors. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Hell on Earth: The Murder of Marie Suchánková - Ripperologist and its editorial team. Michaela Kořistová We occasionally use material we believe has been placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of some - City Beat: PC Harvey thing we have published we will be pleased to make a prop - Neil Bell and Robert Clack er acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 104 July 2009, including the co mpilation of al l materials and the unsigned articles, essays, Mitre Square Revisited news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2009 Ripperologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Suspects Information Booklet
    Metropolitan Police Cold Case Files Case: Jack the Ripper Date of original investigation: August- December 1888 Officer in charge of investigation: Charles Warren, Head of metropolitan police After a detailed and long investigation, the case of the Jack the Ripper murders still has not been solved. After interviewing several witnesses we had a vague idea of what Jack looked like. However, there were many conflicting witness reports on what Jack looked like so we could not be certain. Nevertheless, we had a list of suspects from the witness reports and other evidence left at the scene. Unfortunately, there was not enough evidence to convict any of the suspects. Hopefully, in the future someone can solve these horrendous crimes if more information comes to light. Therefore, the investigation team and I leave behind the information we have on the suspects so that one day he can be found. Charles Warren, Head of the Metropolitan Police Above: The Investigation team Left: Charles Warren, Head of the Metropolitan Police Montague John Druitt Druitt was born in Dorset, England. He the son of a prominent local surgeon. Having received his qualifications from the University of Oxford he became a lawyer in 1885. He was also employed as an assistant schoolmaster at a boarding school in Blackheath, London from 1881 until he was dismissed shortly before his death in 1888. His body was found floating in the river Thames at Chiswick on December 31, 1888. A medical examination suggested that his body was kept at the bottom of the river for several weeks by stones places in their pockets.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTIMS 8Th September of JACK 1888 the RIPPER Born 1841
    Worksheets from RJ Tarr and M. Ellis at www.activehistory.co.uk 2. THE STORY OF POLLY NICHOLS Mary Anne Nichols or ‘Polly’ as she was known to her friends was born on 26th August 1845 in Dean Street, Whitechapel. Her father, Edward Walker was a locksmith. In January 1864 she married William Nichols, a printer’s machinist. The couple went to live with Polly’s father. They stayed there about ten years. In 1874 they set up home for themselves at 6D Peabody Buildings, Stamford Street. They had five children: Edward (1866), Percy (1868), Alice (1870), Eliza (1877) and Henry (1879). Despite all the years they spent together, Polly and William’s marriage ended in 1880. Polly lived in the Lambeth workhouse from 6 September 1880 until 31 May 1881. William paid Polly an allowance of 5 shillings a week during this time until he found out that she had started living with another man. Polly’s remaining years were spent in workhouses and doss houses. Between 24th April 1882 and 24 March 1883 she lived at Lambeth workhouse. There is a gap of four years when Polly lives with her father again, but they quarrelled because Polly was a heavy drinker. She left her father and lived with a blacksmith called Thomas Drew. On 25th October 1887 she stayed at St Giles workhouse. Then, from 26 October to 2 December 1887 she stayed at the Strand Workhouse. On 19th December she returned to Lambeth workhouse but was thrown out ten days later. On 4 January 1888 she was admitted to the Mitcham Workhouse, but transferred back to Lambeth on 4 April 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whitechapel Murders
    The Whitechapel Murders 1. Emma Elizabeth Smith - Osbourne Street 2. Martha Tabram - Gunthorpe Street The Canonical Five 3. Mary Ann Nichols - Buck’s Row 4. Annie Chapman - 29 Hanbury Street 5. Elizabeth Stride - Dutfield’s Yard 6. Catherine Eddowes – Mitre Square 7. Mary Jane Kelly - 13 Miller’s Court 8. Rose Mylett - Clarke’s Yard 9. Alice McKenzie - Castle Alley 10. The Pinchin Street Torso - Pinchin Street 11. Frances Coles – Swallow Gardens The Whitechapel Murders Of the eleven Whitechapel Murders, it is widely believed that Jack the Ripper is directly responsible for five of them. It is possible that the Ripper may have claimed more than five victims, but most experts agree that at least five of the East End murders were the work of Jack the Ripper. Emma Elizabeth Smith The first victim in the series of Whitechapel Murders was a prostitute by the name of Emma Elizabeth Smith. She was attacked and raped on Osbourn Street in Whitechapel on 3 April 1888. During the sexual assault, her attackers inserted a blunt object into her vagina, an injury which would take her life the following day. Before she died the next day at a London hospital, Smith told authorities that two or three men, one of them a teenager, were responsible for her attack. The press had linked Smith’s murder to the subsequent Whitechapel Murders, but most experts later believed that particular murder to be the result of random gang violence. Martha Tabram The next victim in the series of Whitechapel Murders was Martha Tabram, a prostitute in the East End.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Those Who Didn't Fit In
    6 *** Saturday 16 November 2019 The Daily Telegraph The Daily Telegraph Saturday 16 November 2019 *** 7 BOOKS OF THE YEAR BIOGRAPHY questionable parsing of the loot. Years, we see the project beginning history. “Until reported, after might prompt that thought too, “How many American women of to form, along with its obstacles. the lions have 20% off visiting a thanks to Selina Todd’s excellent her generation had lovers, male and “Her main concern is the choice their own all these titles from seven-year-old Tastes of Honey (Chatto & female, as numerous, beautiful, and between ‘I’ and ‘she’,” Ernaux historians,” Telegraph Books. Call boy in foster Windus, £18.99), though prominent?” Moser asks about writes. “There is something too Achebe wrote, care in Delaney’s working-class Susan Sontag. And, 300 pages later: permanent about ‘I’, something “then the story 0844 871 1514 or see Lancashire in background was closer to “How many people, after all, need shrunken and stifling, whereas ‘she’ of the hunt will books.telegraph.co.uk/ 1974. Well, no: Ernaux’s, and her ambition Portraits of those to exhort themselves to bathe?” His is too exterior and remote.” The always glorify Norman was not twinned with angry wit.) That’s rhetorical formulation gives the balance she strikes is the book we the hunter.” bestbooks the problem. And too easy an assumption, but the game away: if Moser sees his are holding: nothing else Grant’s subjects his name was not existence of these two books is who didn’t fit in subject as extreme, then there must approaches the intimacy and speak about the cold Norman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Final Solution (1976)
    When? ‘The Autumn of Terror’ 1888, 31st August- 9th November 1888. The year after Queen Victoria’s Golden jubilee. Where? Whitechapel in the East End of London. Slum environment. Crimes? The violent murder and mutilation of women. Modus operandi? Slits throats of victims with a bladed weapon; abdominal and genital mutilations; organs removed. Victims? 5 canonical victims: Mary Ann Nichols; Annie Chapman; Elizabeth Stride; Catherine Eddowes; Mary Jane Kelly. All were prostitutes. Other potential victims include: Emma Smith; Martha Tabram. Perpetrator? Unknown Investigators? Chief Inspector Donald Sutherland Swanson; Inspector Frederick George Abberline; Inspector Joseph Chandler; Inspector Edmund Reid; Inspector Walter Beck. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Charles Warren. Commissioner of the City of London Police, Sir James Fraser. Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan CID, Sir Robert Anderson. Victim number 5: Victim number 2: Mary Jane Kelly Annie Chapman Aged 25 Aged 47 Murdered: 9th November 1888 Murdered: 8th September 1888 Throat slit. Breasts cut off. Heart, uterus, kidney, Throat cut. Intestines severed and arranged over right shoulder. Removal liver, intestines, spleen and breast removed. of stomach, uterus, upper part of vagina, large portion of the bladder. Victim number 1: Missing portion of Mary Ann Nicholls Catherine Eddowes’ Aged 43 apron found plus the Murdered: 31st August 1888 chalk message on the Throat cut. Mutilation of the wall: ‘The Jews/Juwes abdomen. No organs removed. are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.’ Victim number 4: Victim number 3: Catherine Eddowes Elizabeth Stride Aged 46 Aged 44 th Murdered: 30th September 1888 Murdered: 30 September 1888 Throat cut. Intestines draped Throat cut.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture
    Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture Top Hat, Gladstone Bag and Fog Clare Smith General Editor: Clive Bloom Crime Files Series Editor Clive Bloom Emeritus Professor of English and American Studies Middlesex University London Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fi ction has never been more popular. In novels, short stories, fi lms, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fi ction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fi ction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/[14927] Clare Smith Jack the Ripper in Film and Culture Top Hat, Gladstone Bag and Fog Clare Smith University of Wales: Trinity St. David United Kingdom Crime Files ISBN 978-1-137-59998-8 ISBN 978-1-137-59999-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59999-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016938047 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 The author has/have asserted their right to be identifi ed as the author of this work in accor- dance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack the Ripper
    Year 8 Home Learning, January 2021 (Jack the Ripper) th Lesson 2: What was Whitechapel like in the 19 ​ Century? ​ LO: To be able to explain what the conditions of Whitechapel, London were like at the time of the Ripper murders. Success criteria: ❑ I can describe the events of the Jack the Ripper case. ❑ I can explain what it was like in Whitechapel in the 1800s ❑ I can analyse why these conditions might have had an impact on the Jack the Ripper case. Suggested video links: ● (Jack the Ripper story): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofnp-zucJxE ​ th ● (18 ​ Century Whitechapel): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQQCBZdnkdY ​ ​ Key takeaway knowledge: • East end London was poor • Whitechapel in the east end was extremely poor • People lived in cramped housing • There was lots of crime • Life was extremely difficult Year 8 Home Learning, January 2021 (Jack the Ripper) Main activity Summarise the story of the murders by summarising each paragraph in 1-2 bullet points on the right-hand side, then give each paragraph a title on the left-hand side. Paragraph The story of Jack the Ripper from the BBC Summarise in 1 title or 2 bullet points. The identity of the killer of five - or possibly six - women in the East End of London in 1888 has remained a mystery, but the case has continued to horrify and fascinate. Between August and November 1888,the Whitechapel area of London was the scene of five brutal murders. The killer was dubbed 'Jack the Ripper'. All the women murdered were prostitutes, and all except for one - Elizabeth Stride - were horribly mutilated.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechapel's Wax Chamber of Horrors, 1888
    Whitechapel’s Wax Chamber of Horrors, 1888 By MIKE HAWLEY A waxwork ‘chamber of horrors’1 museum exhibiting ‘vilely executed waxen figures’2 of the most notorious homicides of Victorian times operated in 1888 at just a few minutes’ walking distance from the location of the Mary Ann Nichols murder scene. The museum’s main attraction were images of the Ripper victims which were added to the display as they were murdered! By February 1889, the museum displayed a total of six images of the murdered women,3 beginning with the unfortunate Martha Tabram, who had met her death on 7 August 1888. In his 1892 memoirs, Worship Street Police Court Magistrate Montague Williams recalled his walk through this chamber of horrors in early September 1888: There lay a horrible presentment in wax of Matilda Turner [Martha Tabram], the first victim, as well as one of Mary Ann Nichols, whose body was found in Buck’s Row. The heads were represented as being nearly severed from the bodies, and in each case there were shown, in red paint, three terrible gashes reaching from the abdomen to the ribs.4 Not only did the proprietor of the waxwork museum operate a chamber of horrors, but he also offered live entertainment nightly in the adjacent building.5 Ever cognizant of the money-making formula consisting of, first, satisfying the public’s desire for vice - in this case violence against women – and, secondly, adding a pinch of sex, the proprietor had as the main attraction of the show a tough young lady named Miss Juanita.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalley Quinci Jack the Ripper
    Jack the Ripper BY: QUINCI DALLEY Who was Jack the Ripper u Was an unidentified serial killer u He terrorized the impoverished towns of London in1888 u Nicknamed the Whitechapel Murderer and the Leather Apron When u Terrorized the streets of London in 1888 u First Murder: August 7th u Last: September 10th Victims u Typically female prostitutes from the slums of London u Young to middle age women u At least five women Victims u Mary Ann Nichols u Annie Chapman u Elizabeth Stride u Catherine Eddowes u Mary Jane Kelly u Known as the Canonical 5 How Women Were Killed Slit their throats Removed the internal organs from at least three women Murders u Conducted late at night u Typically close to the end of each month u Murders became more brutal as time went on Investigation u A large team of policemen went from house to house to investigate throughout Whitechapel u They followed the same steps as modern police work u More than 2,000 people were interviewed u About 300 people were investigated u 80 people were detained u But they never found the perpetrator Suspects Since 1888 100 suspects have been named Making Jack the Ripper and his legacy live on Walter Sickert u Many different theories about Jack the Ripper’s identity were brought forth u One being Victorian Painter Walter Sickert u Polish Migrant u Grandson to Queen Victoria Letters u Letters were allegedly sent from the killer to the London Police u These were to taunt the officers u Talked of gruesome actions and more murders to come Letters u The name “Jack the Ripper” came from the
    [Show full text]