Vision and Legacy – 50 Years Later
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation Garret Brouwer
Arbitration Law Review Volume 3 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 37 7-1-2011 The Go-Between: Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation Garret Brouwer Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/arbitrationlawreview Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Garret Brouwer, The Go-Between: Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation, 3 464 (2011). This Student Submission - Book and Literature Review is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arbitration Law Review by an authorized editor of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GO-BETWEEN: JAN ELIASSON AND THE STYLES OF MEDIATION By Garret Brouwer* War and conflict have existed as long as humanity. Sometimes these conflicts can be solved with words. Unfortunately, many others are solved with weapons. With the rise of modern technology in the 20th century, the world has become smaller than ever. Humans can instantaneously communicate with one another across the planet. Economies are increasingly dependent on international trade and cooperation. Nation states have vested political interests in their neighbors and trading partners. Interconnectivity has made it more important than ever for conflicts to be resolved as quickly and painlessly as possible. The less a conflict costs, both economically and socially, the better for everyone involved. One method to limit these costs is international mediation. International powers and organizations have increasingly been using mediation as a means to resolve a wide range of disputes. One individual who has become synonymous with these efforts is Jan Eliasson. -
Section 3 Includes Practical Exercises and Review
Guide for Practical 3 Application Speak Up, Speak Out: A Toolkit for Reporting on Human Rights Issues Section 1 IntroductIon Section 1 IntroductIon NOtes ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -
Figure 4: Male and Female Nobel (And Economics) Laureates, by Subject, 1901–2014 (Change Since 2008)
Figure 4: Male and female Nobel (and economics) laureates, by subject, 1901–2014 (change since 2008) 1 Economics 74 Women 16 Men Peace 87 13 Literature 98 3.5 Chemistry 164 1.5 Physics 196 11 Medicine 196 0 50 100 150 200 Notes: Marie Curie is split between physics and chemistry (0.5/0.5); John Bardeen (Physics twice) and Fred Sanger (Chemistry twice) are counted only once. After this graph was rst published in 2009 ve women were prize winners in just one year. Source: http://nobelprize.org/index.html Specically: http://stats.areppim.com/stats/stats_nobel_sexxcat.htm Increase in the number of prizes awarded in 2009-2014 compared to 1901-2008 (%): Medicine Physics Chemistry Literature Peace Economics Total Change, men 7% 9% 10% 4% 4% 19% 8% Change, women 38% 0% 40% 18% 33% Innite 31% Women awarded a Nobel prize 1901–2014: Physics Peace Literature 1903 – Marie Curie 1905 – Bertha von Suttner 1909 – Selma Lagerlöf 1963 – Maria Goeppert-Mayer 1931 – Jane Addams 1926 – Grazia Deledda Chemistry 1946 – Emily Greene 1928 – Sigrid Undset 1911 – Marie Curie Balch 1938 – Pearl Buck 1935 – Irène Joliot-Curie 1976 – Mairead Corrigan 1945 – Gabriela Mistral 1964 – Dorothy Crowfoot 1976 – Betty Williams 1966 – Nelly Sachs Hodgkin 1979 – Mother Teresa 1991 – Nadine Gordimer 1982 – Alva Myrdal 1993 – Toni Morrison Physiology or Medicine 1991 – Aung San Suu Kyi 1996 – Wislawa Szymborska 1947 – Gerty Cori 1992 – Rigoberta Menchú 2004 – Elfriede Jelinek 1977 – Rosalyn Yalow Tum 2007 – Doris Lessing 1983 – Barbara McClintock 1997 – Jody Williams 2013 – Alice Munro 1986 – Rita Levi-Montalcini 2003 – Shirin Ebadi 1988 – Gertrude B Elion 2004 – Wangari Maathai Prizes awarded to women 1995 – Christiane Nüsslein- 2011 – Ellen Johnson in 2009 Volhard Sirleaf Elizabeth Blackburn – Medicine 2004 – Linda B Buck 2011 – Leymah Gbowee Carol Greider – Medicine 2008 – Françoise Barré- 2011 – Tawakel Karman Ada Yonath – Chemistry Sinoussi 2014 – Malala Yousafzai Herta Müller – Literature 2014 – May-Britt Moser Elinor Ostrom – Economics. -
The Nobel Peace Prize
TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize. -
Choosing Futures: Alva Myrdal and the Construction of Swedish Futures Studies, 1967–1972Ã
IRSH 51 (2006), pp. 277–295 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859006002458 # 2006 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Choosing Futures: Alva Myrdal and the Construction of Swedish Futures Studies, 1967–1972à Jenny Andersson Summary: This article discusses the Swedish discourse on futures studies in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It focuses on the futures discourse of the group appointed by the Prime Minister, Olof Palme, in 1967 under the chairmanship of Alva Myrdal. The Swedish futures discourse focused on futures studies as a democratic means of reform in defence of the Swedish model and ‘‘Swedish’’ values of solidarity and equality, in opposition to an international futurology dominated by the Cold War and dystopic narratives of global disaster. The article suggests that the creation of Swedish futures studies, culminating in a Swedish institute for futures studies, can be seen as a highpoint of postwar planning and the Swedish belief in the possibility of constructing a particularly Swedish future from a particularly Swedish past. INTRODUCTION In 1971, the Swedish Prime Minister and leader of the Social Democratic Party (Socialdemokratiska arbetareparti, SAP), Olof Palme, appointed a group chaired by Alva Myrdal – feminist, social policy researcher, ambassador, minister, and eventually, in 1982, Nobel Peace Prize laureate1 – to study the future. In the early 1970s, Alva Myrdal was well-known through her work on disarmament and world peace, as well as, in the Swedish political context, her radical equality programme for the SAP in 1969. The equality programme was an ambitious attempt to relate social democratic ideology to the critique of the late 1960s and to rethink the à This article was first presented to the conference Alva Myrdal’s Questions to Our Time, Uppsala, 6–8 March 2002, and subsequently published in Swedish as ‘‘Alvas framtider’’, in Christina Florin and Torbjo¨ rn Lundqvist (eds), Historia – en va¨g till framtiden? Perspektiv pa˚ det fo¨rflutnas roll i framtidsstudier (Stockholm, 2003). -
The KPMG IDAS Africa Story
The KPMG IDAS Africa Story Impact Report 2015-2016 kpmg.com/das Acronyms aBi : Agricultural Business Initiative Trust AcT : Accountability in Tanzania AECF : The Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund AGRA : Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa BOP : Bottom of the Pyramid BRACED : Building Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Extremes and Disaster CGAP : Consultative Group to Assist the Poor CICF : County Innovation Challenge Fund Danida : Danish International Development Agency FRP : The MasterCard Foundation Fund for Rural Prosperity FSDT Kenya: Financial Sector Deepening Trust, Kenya FSP : Financial Service Provider GEM : The World Bank Growth and Employment Project GRP : The Global Resilience Partnership HDIF : Human Development Innovation Fund IDAS : International Development Advisory Services IFC : International Finance Corporation IFAD : International Fund for Agricultural Development MEC : MicroEnergy Credits MOOC : Massive Open Online Course REACT : Renewable Energy and Adaptation to Climate Change Technologies (window of the AECF) SCIP Fund: Strategic Climate Institutions Programme Fund SDC : Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation Sida : Swedish International Development Agency SPV : Special Purpose Vehicle THAT : Tandabui Health Access Tanzania Contents 13I 15I AGRIBUSINESS RENEWABLE ENERGY Who We Are 05 AND CLIMATE CHANGE The Grantees 06 Impact at Scale 08 KPMG Values 09 KPMG Lifelong Learning 10 KPMG IDAS Sectors 12 Agribusiness Sector 13 Renewable Energy and 15 Climate Change Resilience Sector 18 18I 22I Innovation, Technology -
The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N. -
Peter Wallensteen
PETER WALLENSTEEN Curriculum Vitae January 2016 Richard G. Starmann Sr. Research Professor of Peace Studies, Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame, IN, USA (Since 2006) And Senior Professor, Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University (as of August 1, 2012) First holder of the Dag Hammarskjöld Chair of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 1985- 2012. Senior Research Fellow, The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, Uppsala, Sweden, since 2015. Married to Lena Wallensteen, Program Director, The Diplomatic Forum, Uppsala University and previously Professional Specialist, Higher Education, University of Notre Dame. Two children and six grandchildren. Contact information: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, PO Box 514, SE 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden. Ph. (+46)(0)18 471 23 52. Fax (+46)(0)18 695102 Email: [email protected] August-December: Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies University of Notre Dame P.O. Box 639, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0639, USA Ph. (+1)(574) 631 0935. Fax (+1)(574) 631 6973 Email: [email protected] 1 (43) Present Positions ____________________________________________________ 2 Education __________________________________________________________ 2 Academic Appointments _____________________________________________ 3 Administrative Positions _____________________________________________ 4 Teaching Experience ________________________________________________ 4 Professional Activities, ongoing ________________________________________ -
About Center for Civilians in Conflict Annual Report
About Center for ANNUAL REPORT Civilians in Conflict 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict works to make warring parties more responsible to civilians before, during, and after armed conflict. We are advocates who believe no civilian caught in conflict should be ignored, and advisors who provide practical solutions to preventing and responding to civilian harm. The organization was founded as Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC) in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a courageous humanitarian killed by a suicide bomber in 2005 while advocating for Iraqi families. CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT T +1 202 558 6958 | F +1 623 321 7076 E [email protected] 1210 18th Street NW | 4th Floor Washington DC 20036 www.civiliansinconflict.org 1 2 Letter from the Chairman of the Board Letter from the Executive Director Dear friends, I want you to know how many people are working to lessen suffering in the world. In Syria, brave doctors are helping wounded civilians. In Pakistan, lawyers are getting compensation I joined this organization back in 2008 because I believed in the work. Here was a small group for conflict victims. In Somalia, journalists courageously tell the story of conflict. War is indeed of dedicated people changing the nature of war. They are an inspiration. brutal, but we see the better side of humanity every day. I also joined because I know potential for growth when I see it. In this global puzzle to create a better world, our piece is as critical as it is unique. Much of my career has been about growing organizations to tackle global health challenges. -
United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington DC 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY ________________________________________________________________________ United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities Testimony before The Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights United States Senate July 23, 2008 Brett D. Schaefer Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom The Heritage Foundation Thank you for inviting me to speak about United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities. My name is Brett Schaefer. I am the Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs at The Heritage Foundation. The views I express in this testimony are my own and should not be construed as representing any official position of The Heritage Foundation. UN Peacekeeping One of the United Nations‘ primary responsibilities—and the one that Americans most agree with—is to help maintain international peace and security, but the UN has come under increasing criticism, both within the United States and around the world, for its inability to keep the peace where it is asked to do so. The UN Charter places principal responsibility for maintaining international peace and security within the UN system on the Security Council.1 The Charter gives the Security Council extensive powers to investigate disputes to determine whether they endanger international peace and security; to call on participants in a dispute to settle the conflict through peaceful negotiation; to impose mandatory economic, travel, and diplomatic sanctions; and ultimately to authorize the use of military force.2 This robust vision of the UN as a key vehicle for maintaining international peace and security quickly ran athwart the interests of the member states, particularly during the Cold War when opposing alliances prevented the UN from taking decisive action except when the interests of the major powers were minimal. -
© Kate Holt/IRIN
1 © Kate Holt/IRIN WHY WASHINGTON STATE? Washington state continues to be a leading exporter, shipping $81.9 billion in goods and $24 billion in services in 2013,1 but there is more to the story than just airplanes and software. Our state’s most important export is a better quality of life for people all over the world. Washington state NGOs and companies are working in over 200 countries in areas such as food security, human rights, good governance, economic development, education, environment and health. With such a strong global development community, Washington state could easily be called the Silicon Valley of Hope. WHY GLOBAL WASHINGTON? Global Washington is the only organization in Washington state that unites businesses, nonprofits, foundations and universities that are working in global development, leading to partnerships that result in innovative products and solutions in the field. We promote our members, bring them together to spark new ideas, and build a network of leaders improving lives around the world. Global Washington believes that by collaborating and working together in our efforts, we accelerate a shared mission of making the world a better place. 1 Washington Council on International Trade 2 PHOTO: SPREEHA GLOBAL CHALLENGES EDUCATION ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Worldwide, 114 million More than 3.7 billion children don’t receive people struggle to live a basic primary on $2 per day, and half education.1 And even of those are actually for those who are enrolled in surviving on $1 per day or less.5 In school, the quality of education is 12 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, often extremely low. -
Modelo De Equidad De Género Julio 2013 Premios Nobel De
MODELO DE EQUIDAD DE GÉNERO Por la equidad entre mujeres y hombres en el Colpos JULIO 2013 PREMIOS NOBEL DE LA PAZ ALVA REIMER MYRDAL Y ALFONSO GARCÍA ROBLES Alva Reimer Myrdal (1902-1986), Nacida en Suecia se destacó como política, feminista y pacifista. Fue dirigente en la creación del estado de bienestar sueco, que transformó la nación de un estado de pobreza y atraso a un modelo para otras naciones europeas (incluyendo a las mujeres). Participó de manera activa en el Partido Socialdemócrata Sueco, y a finales de los años cuarenta se involucró en temas internacionales. Fue directora de la Oficina de Asuntos Sociales de la Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU) y dirigió el departamento de Ciencias Sociales de la Organización para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura de Naciones Unidas (UNESCO), siendo la primera mujer en alcanzar tan importantes cargos en la ONU. Trabajó como embajadora de su país en India, Birmania y Sri Lanka y en 1962 encabezó a la delegación sueca en la Conferencia para el Desarme celebrada en Ginebra. Entre 1966 y 1972 ostentó la cartera de Desarme del gobierno sueco, cargo que compaginó con el de ministra de Asuntos Eclesiásticos. En 1982, recibe junto con el mexicano Alfonso García Robles, el Premio Nobel de la Paz por su contribución al movimiento de desarme nuclear durante los años sesenta y setenta. Alfonso García Robles (1911-1991). Diplomático y jurista mexicano, fue secretario de Relaciones Exteriores de México, donde a lo largo de cinco años permaneció en calidad de subdirector de Asuntos Políticos del Servicio Diplomático y Secretario de Asuntos Internacionales de la Comisión Nacional de Planeación para la Paz, donde participó en sentar las bases jurídicas de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU), ahí se ocupó de supervisar los asuntos políticos internacionales, los procesos de pacificación de conflictos y las relaciones entre la organización mundial y los organismos regionales.