DOCSLIB.ORG

Euphemisms.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Euphemisms.Pdf Masaryk University Brno Faculty of Education Department of English Language and Literature Euphemisms Brno 2012 Author: Supervisor: Mgr. Kristýna Šebková Mgr. Radek Vogel, PhD. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Mgr. Radek Vogel, Ph.D. for revising my thesis and his helpful and friendly attitude. 2 Declaration I hereby declare that this paper is completely my own work and that I used only the sources listed in the bibliography. .............................................................. 25 July 2012 3 Annotation This paper aims to outline the bright and the dark side of euphemizing. In the increasingly complicated, globalised society, there is a rising tendency to avoid speaking directly about sensitive topics. In this atmosphere, a disturbing question arises: is the widespread overuse of euphemisms undermining our ability to recognize euphemisms used as a tool of manipulation by politicians and the media? The main focus of this thesis is exploring the use of euphemisms in public discourse and discussing the way they alter our perception of inconvenient truths. Key words Euphemisms, political correctness, doublespeak. 4 CONTENTS 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………… 6 2. Formation of euphemisms……………………………………… 8 3. Why we need to euphemize…………………………….……. 9 3.1 A euphemizing instinct……………………………………… 9 3.2 The euphemism treadmill………………………………. 10 3.3 Motives for euphemizing………………………………… 12 4. Most commonly euphemized topics……………………… 15 4.1 Religious terms ………………………………………………. 15 4.2 Death and illness…………………………………………….. 15 4.3 Sex………………………………………………………………….. 18 5. Doublespeak: The dark side of euphemisms…………. 27 5.1 Political correctness……………………………………….. 27 5.2 Doublespeak……………………………………………………. 30 5.3 Fighting back……………………………………………………. 35 6. Conclusion……………………………………………………………. 37 Works cited………………………………………………………………. 39 5 1. INTRODUCTION Euphemism is usually defined as “the substitution of an agreeable or inoffensive expression for one that may offend or suggest something unpleasant. The origin of this word is Greek euphēmismos, from euphēmos auspicious, sounding good, from eu- + phēmē speech, from phanai to speak.” (Webster 428) Therefore, it may be natural to assume that euphemizing serves good purposes and the speakers use euphemisms with honest intentions, when their aim is not to hurt or offend someone. However, this paper will show that using euphemistic expressions is much more complicated than that. As various articles, comments or blogs suggest, people are increasingly sensitive to avoiding naming things directly. This trend may have resulted from so-called doublespeak, i.e. a term that William Lutz uses to describe “language designed to evade responsibility, make the unpleasant appear pleasant, the unattractive appear attractive. Basically, it is language that pretends to communicate, but really does not. It is language designed to mislead, while pretending not to.” (Lutz “Doublespeak”) What is more, the reasons why people euphemize keep changing, together with the topics avoided, and the words used to allude to such topics indirectly. Bearing in mind the well-known metaphor that language is the vehicle of thought, one can learn a lot about a society, its knowledge, culture and values by studying euphemisms. As Keyes (30) observes, “Words originally were not considered distinct from what they named.” The superstitious need not to utter certain words that described e.g. evil spirits or things considered sacred is still echoed today in idioms or proverbs, such as “touch/knock on wood“ or “speak of the devil…”. However, it is very difficult to avoid speaking about unpleasant issues completely. That is why people have always felt the urge to find a way to speak about phenomena they feared, disliked, worshipped or considered taboo, while not naming them directly. Taking this into consideration, it could be concluded that attempts to use euphemisms are as old as our ability to use language. Keyes (30-31) claims that “euphemisms are a key indicator of increasing complexity of speech. Saying what we mean takes a high order of intelligence. It takes an even higher order to not say what we mean, while still conveying our thought.” 6 In the present paper I will examine the motives behind using euphemisms, ways to create them, I will outline the most commonly euphemized topics, and focus on the so-called bright and dark sides of euphemisms; i.e. euphemisms as a creative source of amusement on one hand, in contrast to using obscure terms in order to blur inconvenient truths and society’s reaction to this form of manipulation. 7 2. FORMATION OF EUPHEMISMS There have been many attempts to divide the ways of forming euphemisms into several categories. It is not the aim of this paper to suggest its own categorization. Nevertheless, I consider it useful to mention a few examples of different ways to euphemize. The processes by means of which euphemisms are created include: a. borrowing words from other languages (Williams, Allan and Burridge): in English, Latin and French terms are preferred, e.g. Latin terminology for body parts used by educators, medical terms, e.g. “halitosis” (bad breath)< Latin halitus for breath; “au naturel” < French for naked, “lingerie” < women’s underwear b. semantic changes (Williams, Allan and Burridge, Rawson, Keyes): this category is very wide and may include circumlocution, i.e. using longer expressions, e.g. “little girl’s room” < toilet, “postconsumer secondary material” < garbage, “terminological inaccuracy” < lie; widening, i.e. increasing the level of abstraction, e.g. “growth” < cancer, “foundation” < girdle, “solid human waste” < feces, “the situation” < pregnancy, “do it” < have sex; metaphorical transfer, e.g. “blossom” < pimple, “the cavalry’s come” < menstruation c. phonetic distortion (Allan and Burridge, Keyes): this category includes clippings and abbreviation (e.g. “ladies” < ladies’ room, “vamp” < vampire (a seductive woman), “BS” or “bull” < bullshit, “ED” < erectile dysfunction) , reduplication (e.g. “pee-pee” < piss, “jeepers creeper” < Jesus Crist), distortion of pronunciation (e.g. “shoot” or “shite” < shit, “fudge” < fuck, “cripes” or “crust” < Christ) The ways to euphemize are even more varied than the categories above suggest. Nevertheless, how expressions are euphemized only arises from a more essential issue, which is discussed in the following chapter: the need to actually do so. 8 3. WHY WE NEED TO EUPHEMIZE This seemingly simple question has been asked and answered hundreds of times. For instance, Cumming cites Allan and Burridge who claim: "A euphemism is used as an alternative to a dispreferred expression, in order to avoid possible loss of face: either one's own face or, through giving offence, that of the audience, or of some third party." (Cumming) 3.1 A euphemizing instinct If anyone starts thinking about when they last used a euphemistic expression rather than a word that might cause offence or make someone feel uncomfortable, they will probably not find it difficult to remember; it may have been a few minutes ago, when talking to a colleague and excusing themselves saying “I need to wash my hands”, or “powder my nose”, or “use the restroom”. However, if the motive for using such expressions is analyzed, the answer may no longer be so simple; unless, of course, “everybody says that” is considered a sufficient reason for this behavior. Although the rules by which our society functions seem to be the obvious explanation, the question remains: how does the society create these rules? Who decides what is appropriate and what is not? If this question is narrowed to language, namely the expressions that are considered polite and suitable, the answer might have been given by the University of Chicago linguist Joseph Williams, who said: "Euphemism is such a pervasive human phenomenon, so deeply woven into virtually every known culture, that one is tempted to claim that every human has been pre- programmed to find ways to talk about tabooed subjects." (Walker) Ralph Keyes calls this a “euphemizing instinct” and uses medical research conducted by Valerie Curtis as evidence. Curtis claims that our need for euphemisms originates in the newer parts of our brain, where complex thoughts are created. By contrast, spontaneously uttered words emerge from the limbic brain. Keyes agrees with Curtis’s theory which suggests that creating euphemisms may have contributed to developing our ability to think, since the brain and our ability to speak have been evolving concurrently. (Keyes 247) 9 3.2 The euphemism treadmill As mentioned above, euphemisms help everyone to talk about subjects that the society considers taboo. What can help to understand the ever-changing essence of euphemisms is the process of automatization: “If we examine the general laws of perception, we see that as it becomes habitual, it also becomes automatic.”(Shklovsky 4-5) When this principle is applied to euphemizing, it could be argued that “some words undergo pejoration because of a taboo against talking about the things they name; the replacement for a taboo term is a euphemism…Euphemisms, in their turn, are often subject to pejoration, eventually becoming a taboo. Then the whole cycle starts again.” (Algeo and Pyles 214) The process, known by linguists as pejoration or semantic change, has also been given another term: the euphemism treadmill. As the feminist author Germaine Greer (298) notes, “It is the fate of euphemisms to lose their function rapidly by association with the actuality of what
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Velocity of Censorship
    The Velocity of Censorship: High-Fidelity Detection of Microblog Post Deletions Tao Zhu, Independent Researcher; David Phipps, Bowdoin College; Adam Pridgen, Rice University; Jedidiah R. Crandall, University of New Mexico; Dan S. Wallach, Rice University This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 22nd USENIX Security Symposium. August 14–16, 2013 • Washington, D.C., USA ISBN 978-1-931971-03-4 Open access to the Proceedings of the 22nd USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX The Velocity of Censorship: High-Fidelity Detection of Microblog Post Deletions Tao Zhu David Phipps Adam Pridgen [email protected] Computer Science Computer Science Independent Researcher Bowdoin College Rice University Jedidiah R. Crandall Dan S. Wallach Computer Science Computer Science University of New Mexico Rice University Abstract terconnected through their social graph and tend to post about sensitive topics. This biases us towards the content Weibo and other popular Chinese microblogging sites are posted by these particular users, but enables us to mea- well known for exercising internal censorship, to comply sure with high fidelity the speed of the censorship and with Chinese government requirements. This research discern interesting patterns in censor behaviors. seeks to quantify the mechanisms of this censorship: Sina Weibo (weibo.com, referred to in this paper sim- how fast and how comprehensively posts are deleted. ply as “Weibo”) has the most active user community of Our analysis considered 2.38 million posts gathered over any microblog site in China [39]. Weibo provides ser- roughly two months in 2012, with our attention focused vices which are similar to Twitter, with @usernames, on repeatedly visiting “sensitive” users.
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Argumentative Euphemisms, Political Correctness and Relevance
    Argumentative Euphemisms, Political Correctness and Relevance Thèse présentée à la Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines Institut des sciences du langage et de la communication Université de Neuchâtel Pour l'obtention du grade de Docteur ès Lettres Par Andriy Sytnyk Directeur de thèse: Professeur Louis de Saussure, Université de Neuchâtel Rapporteurs: Dr. Christopher Hart, Senior Lecturer, Lancaster University Dr. Steve Oswald, Chargé de cours, Université de Fribourg Dr. Manuel Padilla Cruz, Professeur, Universidad de Sevilla Thèse soutenue le 17 septembre 2014 Université de Neuchâtel 2014 2 Key words: euphemisms, political correctness, taboo, connotations, Relevance Theory, neo-Gricean pragmatics Argumentative Euphemisms, Political Correctness and Relevance Abstract The account presented in the thesis combines insights from relevance-theoretic (Sperber and Wilson 1995) and neo-Gricean (Levinson 2000) pragmatics in arguing that a specific euphemistic effect is derived whenever it is mutually manifest to participants of a communicative exchange that a speaker is trying to be indirect by avoiding some dispreferred saliently unexpressed alternative lexical unit(s). This effect is derived when the indirectness is not conventionally associated with the particular linguistic form-trigger relative to some context of use and, therefore, stands out as marked in discourse. The central theoretical claim of the thesis is that the cognitive processing of utterances containing novel euphemistic/politically correct locutions involves meta-representations of saliently unexpressed dispreferred alternatives, as part of relevance-driven recognition of speaker intentions. It is argued that hearers are “invited” to infer the salient dispreferred alternatives in the process of deriving explicatures of utterances containing lexical units triggering euphemistic/politically correct interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Media Self-Censorship During the Second Lebanon War
    conflict & communication online, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2019 www.cco.regener-online.de ISSN 1618-0747 Sagi Elbaz & Daniel Bar-Tal Voluntary silence: Israeli media self-censorship during the Second Lebanon War Kurzfassung: Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Charakteristika der Selbstzensur im Allgemeinen, und insbesondere in den Massenmedien, im Hinblick auf Erzählungen von politischer Gewalt, einschließlich Motivation und Auswirkungen von Selbstzensur. Es präsentiert zunächst eine breite theoretische Konzeptualisierung der Selbstzensur und konzentriert sich dann auf seine mediale Praxis. Als Fallstudie wurde die Darstellung des Zweiten Libanonkrieges in den israelischen Medien untersucht. Um Selbstzensur als einen der Gründe für die Dominanz hegemonialer Erzählungen in den Medien zu untersuchen, führten die Autoren Inhaltsanalysen und Tiefeninterviews mit ehemaligen und aktuellen Journalisten durch. Die Ergebnisse der Analysen zeigen, dass israelische Journalisten die Selbstzensur weitverbreitet einsetzen, ihre Motivation, sie zu praktizieren, und die Auswirkungen ihrer Anwendung auf die Gesellschaft. Abstract: This article describes the characteristics of self-censorship in general, specifically in mass media, with regard to narratives of political violence, including motivations for and effects of practicing self-censorship. It first presents a broad theoretical conceptualization of self-censorship, and then focuses on its practice in media. The case study examined the representation of The Second Lebanon War in the Israeli national media. The authors carried out content analysis and in-depth interviews with former and current journalists in order to investigate one of the reasons for the dominance of the hegemonic narrative in the media – namely, self-censorship. Indeed, the analysis revealed widespread use of self-censorship by Israeli journalists, their motivations for practicing it, and the effects of its use on the society.
    [Show full text]
  • Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma Robert Corn-Revere
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 45 Article 4 Number 2 Winter 2018 1-1-2018 Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma Robert Corn-Revere Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Corn-Revere, Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma, 45 Hastings Const. L.Q. 301 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol45/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma by ROBERT CORN-REVERE* Pity the plight of poor Anthony Comstock. The man H. L. Mencken described as "the Copernicus of a quite new art and science," who literally invented the profession of antiobscenity crusader in the waning days of the nineteenth century, ultimately got, as legendary comic Rodney Dangerfield would say, "no respect, no respect at all." As head of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, and special agent for the U.S. Post Office under a law that popularly bore his name, Comstock was, in Mencken's words, the one "who first capitalized moral endeavor like baseball or the soap business, and made himself the first of its kept professors."' For more than four decades, Comstock terrorized writers, publishers, and artists-driving some to suicide-yet he also was the butt of public ridicule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Features and Persuasion Techniques in Marlboro Cigarette Advertisement Slogans
    PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUASION TECHNIQUES IN MARLBORO CIGARETTE ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 111214161 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUASION TECHNIQUES IN MARLBORO CIGARETTE ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 111214161 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ヽ И Sαげα4α Pθ ″グ′どJttη″Thcsis On THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUAS10N TECHNIQUESIN MARLBORO CIGARETT逸 ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 11121416l Approved by Carla Sih Prabandtti,S.Pd.,M.Hum. Date: 10 May 2AI7 ― ― ― PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEDICATION PAGE Success is not the key to happiness. Happiness is the key to success. If you love what you are doing, you will be successful. (Herman Cain) If there is no struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass) We all make mistakes, have struggles, and even regret things in our past. But you’re not your mistakes, you’re not your struggles, and you are here right now with the power to shape your day and your future.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphemism in Animated Films a Multimodal And
    Seeing the unseen: Euphemism in Animated Films A Multimodal and Critical Discourse Study by Dalia Abyd Asseel M.A. (Linguistics) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LANCASTER UNIVERSITY, UK JULY 2020 Abstract Animated films are contemporary popular cultural products recreating the ‘real’ world and engaging massive worldwide audiences of adults and children. Children as the ostensible viewers of animated films may acquire their cultural and ideological knowledge and beliefs about the world from the representations in animated films. Although during the past decade animated films have increasingly been the focus of attention of researchers across different disciplines, including education, gender, sexuality and literacy, studies tackling the discourse and language of animated films are still in their early stages. More specifically, very few studies have investigated the use of euphemism as a major micro-level linguistic device reflecting macro-level discourse and extending to sociocultural structures. To this end, this thesis examines euphemism constructed through the discourse of animated films by employing the strategies of Critical Discourse Studies (CDS). Moreover, Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA) is employed to examine discursive strategies involving visual representations accompanying euphemism and what underpins those strategies, and to shed light on the multimodal relations between the representation of both. Euphemism is frequently associated with the notion of taboo. Consequently, new words or phrases are designated to refer to linguistic taboos as alternatives used by speakers to minimise the threat to the audience’s face as well as to their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Grips with Life in the Disinformation Age
    Coming to Grips with Life in the Disinformation Age “The Information Age” is the term given to post-World War II contemporary society, particularly from the Sixties, onward, when we were coming to the realization that our ability to publish information of all kinds, fact and fiction, was increasing at an exponential rate so as to make librarians worry that they would soon run out of storage space. Their storage worries were temporarily allayed by the advent of the common use of microform analog photography of printed materials, and eventually further by digital technology and nanotechnology. It is noted that in this era, similar to other past eras of great growth in communications technology such as written language, the printing press, analog recording, and telecommunication, dramatic changes occurred as well in human thinking and socialness. More ready archiving negatively impacted our disposition to remember things by rote, including, in recent times, our own phone numbers. Moreover, many opportunities for routine socializing were lost, particularly those involving public speech and readings, live music and theater, live visits to neighbors and friends, etc. The recognition that there had been a significant tradeoff from which there seemed to be no turning back evoked discussion of how to come to grips with “life in the Information Age”. Perhaps we could discover new social and intellectual opportunities from our technological advances to replace the old ones lost, ways made available by new technology. Today we are facing a new challenge, also brought on largely by new technology: that of coming to grips with life in the “Disinformation Age”.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations: a Guide to Strategic Communication
    Public Relations: A Guide to Strategic Communication By Young Joon Lim FIRST EDITION Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher Kassie Graves, Director of Acquisitions Jamie Giganti, Senior Managing Editor Jess Estrella, Senior Graphic Designer Bob Farrell, Senior Field Acquisitions Editor Gem Rabanera, Project Editor Elizabeth Rowe, Licensing Coordinator Allie Kiekhofer, Associate Editor Kevin Fontimayor, Interior Designer Copyright © 2017 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Cover image copyright © Copyright © 2015 iStockphoto LP/baona. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-63487-475-5 (pbk) / 978-1-63487-476-2 (br) Contents CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Public Relations 2 Understanding Public Relations 2 Definitions of Public Relations 3 Who Uses Public Relations, and Why? 4 Six Representative Entities of Public Relations Practice Why is Public Relations Promising as an Academic Course? 7 How is Public Relations Processed? 8 ROPE: Research, Objectives, Planning, and Evaluation RACE: Research, Action, Communication, and Evaluation GRACE: Goal, Research, Action, Communication, and Evaluation RPIE: Research, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Who are the Essential Publics of Public Relations? 10 What are the Components of Public Relations? 11 What are the Stereotypes or Misperceptions about Public Relations? 11 How Does Public Relations Differ from Other Similar Fields of Practice? 12 Advertising vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Struggles and Power Strategies of the Rights in Latin America Today
    http://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n31.2019.01 Memorial struggles and power strategies of the rights in Latin America today Luchas memoriales y estrategias de poder de las derechas en América Latina hoy Verónica Giordano Teacher and Researcher UBA and CONICET [email protected] Orcid code: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-6984 Gina Paola Rodríguez Teacher and Researcher UNLPam and UBA [email protected] Orcid code: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-3386 Abstract Recently, right-wing forces of different origins and types have sprung up in Latin America. In this article, four countries are studied: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. The first two correspond to cases in which the right-wing groups stand in opposition to the so-called progressive governments. The other two correspond to cases in which they stand in a political system with a strong continuity of predominance of right-wing forces. Since there are few studies with an overall perspective, this article seeks to make a contribution in that direction. The objective is to analyze the non-electoral strategies of construction and/ or exercise of power implemented by the right-wing groups around the memorial struggles. Based on the review of journalistic sources and speeches of the national right-wing referents, this article analyzes how current right-wing groups have proceeded to the institution of languages and the definition of a field of meanings that dispute the meaning of the recent past. From a comparative perspective, it is argued that in all four cases negationism offers an effective repertoire for these groups, which is used in their non- electoral (as well as electoral) strategies for building hegemony at the cultural level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euphemism in 'Us and North Korea Summit' News Articles of the New York Times Online
    IR - PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background of The Study Media is in the center of a struggle for power and control in any society (McChesney 2004). Media also has much potential to influence public’s attitudes and bring much attention to guide public’s opinions (Dickson 1992). Media producers determine their influence; they have the power to choose which facts or stories are included or excluded, how events are presented, and how viewers are positioned as the subject of the media. Thus, the primary function of media is framing the information in a desirable ideological perspective, and the producers emphasize this power in media appropriately by using precise language devices such as euphemism, the most effective control for power in the media (Ryabova 2013). As Orwell stated in Ryabova, “…political speech and writing are largely the defenses of the indefensible. Political language consists largely of euphemism, question-begging, and sheer cloudy vagueness” (Ryabova 2013). This statement relates to the definition of euphemism mentioned by Brekle (1989), euphemism is a sort of semantic camouflage and an instrument to frame the mindset or the ideology of the mass (Brekle 1989). Originally, euphemism is derived from Greek roots, it is made up of eu- which means good, and pheme, which denotes speech, voice, utterance, or speaking (Šebková 2012). In a broad definition, Burridge (2012) considered euphemism as a sweet or at least harmless alternative to phrases that speakers or 1 SKRIPSI THE EUPHEMISM IN... FIRDA AYU ADILAH IR - PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA 2 authors prefer not to use in the execution of a specific communicative purpose on a specific occasion (Burridge 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Euphemism, Its History, Possible Classifications, and Euphemistic Strategies from Pragmatic Point of View
    VILNIUS PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF PHILOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHILOLOGY LAURA SAMOŠKAITĖ 21ST CENTURY POLITICAL EUPHEMISMS IN ENGLISH NEWSPAPERS: SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL STUDY MA PAPER Academic advisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Linas Selmistraitis Vilnius, 2011 VILNIUS PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF PHILOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHILOLOGY 21ST CENTURY POLITICAL EUPHEMISMS IN ENGLISH NEWSPAPERS: SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL STUDY This MA paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of the MA in English Philology By Laura Samoškaitė I declare that this study is my own and does not contain any unacknowledged work from any source Academic advisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Linas Selmistraitis 1 CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….…..3 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………….….4 I. EUPHEMISMS AS SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION….…6 1.1 Conceptual features of euphemism………………………………………………………..6 1.2 Semantic and structural differentiation of euphemisms………………………………….12 1.3 Euphemistic strategies from pragmatic point of view……………………………………17 1.4 Political euphemisms in political discourse………………………………………………20 II. EUPHEMISMS IN POLITICAL TEXTS OF THE 21ST CENTURY……………………..26 2.1 Semantic features of political euphemisms………………………………………………26 2.2 Application of B. Warren’s model to political euphemisms……………………………..46 CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………………………53 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………55 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………56 2 Abstract The aim of this study is to explore the political euphemisms that are used in the English newspapers of the 21st century and analyse their semantic and structural features. The objectives of the analysis are: to examine theoretical approaches and studies concerning the concept and features of euphemisms; to identify the political euphemisms used in today’s English newspapers; to group euphemisms into classes according to semantic features; and to analyse structural and semantic peculiarities of political euphemisms.
    [Show full text]