February 1982 Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
February 1982 vol. VII NO. 2 Department of interior. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Bulletin Endangered Species Program, Washington, D.C. 20240 to reproduce in Clear Creek and may compete for food and cover with the Recovery Plan Approved for Clear Creek gambusia. The Wilkinson family, landowners of the Clear Creek Ranch, have played a Clear Creek Gambusia major role in conservation efforts for the species and have demonstrated a high level of environmental concern for the The Clear Creek Gambusia Recovery Where the Clear Creek gambusia and perpetuation of this fish. However, the Plan was approved by the Service on mosquito fish occur together, hybridiza- ranch is presently for sale and the con- January 14, 1982. The Rio Grande Re- tion and competition for food occur. The cern of future landowners cannot be covery Team which includes members mosquito fish generally associates with predicted. from Texas Parks and Wildlife Depart- a eurythermal relatively alkaline envi- Recovery tasks identified by the plan ment, New Mexico Department of Game ronment in contrast to the requirements for the recovery of the Clear Creek and Fish, University of Texas, Okla- of the Clear Creek gambusia. However, gambusia include further research into homa State University, University of its preference for warmer water causes its biology, ecological requirements, Nuevo Leon and the Service prepared a winter migration towards the head- and competition with the mosquito fish the plan. spring where the Clear Creek gambusia and rainwater killifish; protection of the The Clear Creek gambusia (Gam- is restricted. The first dam below the headsprings habitat; maintenance of a busia heterochir) was first collected on head-spring deteriorated over the years captive population; possible restoration February 22, 1953, in Wilkinson Springs and has periodically allowed invasion of of the original habitat (i.e. the entire on the Clear Creek Ranch in Menard mosquito fish into the habitat of the stretch of Clear Creek); and public County, Texas. Listed as Endangered in Clear Creek gambusia. Repairs to the information. 1967, it is only known to occur in the dam which were funded by the Service Implementation of the recovery plan headwaters of Clear Creek located on and carried out by recovery team mem- will be initiated by the Service's the Clear Creek Ranch. The recovery bers and associates in August and Sep- Albuquerque Regional Director and plan identifies the major threats to the tember 1979 have restored this barrier carried out through the Albuquerque species as genetic and environmental and at least temporarily blocked further Regional Endangered Species Staff. competition with mosquito fish immigration by mosquito fish. Further information on the Clear Creek (Gambusia affinis) and potential devel- A collection of rainwater killifish gambusia recovery effort can be ob- opment of its extremely restricted (Lucania parva) in Clear Creek in 1980 tained by contacting the Regional Direc- habitat. documents a recent new introduction tor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Originally Clear Creek was a clear and additional potential threat. Although Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico spring run that freely flowed about 5 km a brackish water species, it is expected 87130 (505/766-2321). to its confluence with the San Saba Riv- er. Upper Clear Creek, which consists of a series of interconnected limestone Pupfish Removed from Endangered springs originating from Edwards Aqui- fer, has been altered extensively for irri- Species List gation and domestic uses. Prior to 1900, a low, earth-concrete dam was After a review of all available data, combining of two spring outflows, which built about 75 meters downstream from the Service has determined the Tecopa in turn created unfavorable habitat for the headsprings. Three additional dams pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis the pupfish. were built downstream from the original calidae) to be extinct and has, there- The effects of habitat alteration, pos- dam in the 1930's, ponding water to the fore, removed it from the U.S. List of sibly combined with competition and base of each subsequent dam. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife predation from introduced fishes, The Clear Creek gambusia has spe- and Plants (F.R. 1/15/82). This action caused such a precipitous decline in the cific habitat requirements which restrict discontinues protection for the fish and population by 1969 that the fish was it to that part of Clear Creek with clear, its habitat provided by the Endangered listed as Endangered by both the Fed- sternothermal, low pH (6.1-6.5) waters Species Act of 1973, as amended. eral and State governments in 1970. By having abundant aquatic vegetation The Tecopa pupfish, a tiny fish only 1972, it was reported to no longer occur composed mainly of an endemic, unde- about 1.5 inches long, was described in at the type locality, and surveys in 1977 scribed form of Ceratophyllum sp. Al- 1948 by Dr. Robert Rush Miller from the failed to locate any other population. though at one time it may have been outflow streams of two springs (north A proposal to remove the Tecopa more widespread in the Clear Creek and south Tecopa Hot Springs) north of pupfish from the Federal list of Endan- drainage, extensive collecting in 1956 the town of Tecopa in southern Califor- gered species was published in the and 1957 found this fish confined al- nia. During the 1950's, remodeling and Federal Register on July 3, 1978. The most entirely to the spring-fed upper- landscaping of the hot spring bath- California Department of Fish and most pool. houses resulted in the rechanneling and Continued on page 7 and Game Endangered Species Staff to coordinate programs for the coming year. Because of no new Section 6 funding in Fiscal Year 1982, California's Endangered Species Program will be greatly reduced. State biologists are re- signing from Recovery Team Leader positions on at least two recovery teams, and the emphasis of staff time will be on processing State endangered species permits. The final draft of the Southern Sea Otter Recovery Plan has been approved by the Director. The Sacramento office has released a report on the results of the California mid-winter bald eagle surveys, 1979- 1981. Approximately 700 to 900 bald eagles were counted annually. The Cal- ifornia portion of the Klamath Basin sup- ported almost half of the eagles in the Endangered Species Program regional Soda, California, recently was extir- State. Manmade reservoirs are the sec- staffers have reported the following ac- pated. The cause of the die-off, which ond most important habitat, supporting tivities for the month of January: did not affect a nearby natural lake pop- approximately 37 percent of California's ulation of the chub, is unknown. bald eagles. Region 1—An artificial pond popula- The Sacramento Area Office en- A revised edition of the Bald Eagle tion of the Endangered Mohave tui chub dangered species staff met with the re- h/lanagement Guidelines: Washington- (Gila biocolor mohavensis) at Fort maining California Department of Fish Oregon was issued in December 1981. The guidelines, created for use by land- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 87103 (505-766-2321): Jerry Stegman, owners and land managers, describe Washington, D.C. 20240 Acting Regional Director; Robert F. restrictions in activities and manage- Stephens, Assistant Regional Director; ment recommendations that should be Robert A. Jantzen, Director Jack B. Woody, Endangered Species (202-343-4717) Specialist. applied around bald eagle nest and Ronald E. Lambertson Region 3, Federal BIdg , Fort Snelling, Twin roost sites. The guidelines are advisory Associate Director and Cities, MN 55111 (612-725-3500): James only, and past editions have been well Endangered Species Program Manager W. Pulliam, Acting Regional Director; received by the numerous private and (202-343-4646) Daniel H. Bumgarner, Ass/sfanf fleg/ona/ governmental land managers who over- Harold J. O'Connor Director: James M. Engel, Endangered see bald eagle habitat in Washington Deputy Associate Director Species Specialist. and Oregon. Single copies may be ob- (202-343-4646) Region 4, Richard B. Russell Federal BIdg., John L. Spinks, Chief, tained from the Area Manager, U.S. 75 Spring St., S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303 Fish and Wildlife Service, 2625 Park- Office of Endangered Species (404-221-3583): Walter O. Stieglitz, Act- (703-235-2771) ing Regional Director; John Christian, mont Lane, Olympia, Washington Richard Parsons, Chief, Assistant Regional Director; Alex B. 98502. Federal Wildlife Permit Office Montgomery, Endangered Species Region 2—Recently, 146 adult razor- (703-235-1937) Specialist. Clark R. Bavin, Chief, back suckers (Xyranchea texanus) Region 5, Suite 700, One Gateway Center, were moved from Lake Mohave to the Division of Law Enforcement Newton Corner, MA 02158 (617-965- (202-343-9242) 5100): Howard Larsen, Regional Direc- Dexter National Fish Hatchery as part of a cooperative program with the States TECHNICAL BULLETIN STAFF tor; Gordon T. Nightingale, Assistant Re- of Arizona and New Mexico. Over one Clare Senecal Kearney, Editor gional Director; Paul Nickerson, Endan- Michael Bender, Assistant Editor gered Species Specialist. million eggs have been produced at (703-235-2407) Region 6, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Dexter, with several million more ex- Center, Denver, CO 80225 (303-234- pected. Young razorbacks from these 2209): Don W. MInnlch, Regional Direc- eggs will be stocked in the wild, or tor; Charles E. Lane, Assistant Regional made available to the States for rearing Regional Offices Director: Don Rodgers, Endangered or stocking in lieu of listing the species. Region 1, Suite 1692, Lloyd 500 BIdg., 500 Species Specialist. N.E. Multnomah St., Portland, OR 97232 Region 7, 1101 E. Tudor Rd., Anchorage, (For more on the stocking program, see (503-231-6118): Richard J. Myshak, fle- AK 99503 (907-276-3800, ext.