DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Strategy for Springsnails in Nevada and Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Strategy for Springsnails in Nevada and Utah CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR SPRINGSNAILS IN NEVADA AND UTAH Prepared by: Museum of Northern Arizona Springs Stewardship Institute 3101 N. Ft. Valley Rd. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 [email protected] Prepared for: The Nevada-Utah Springsnail Conservation Team Nevada Department of Wildlife and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Version 1.0, 1 26 August 2020 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The effort to conserve springsnails and their habitats requires foresight, accord, patience, and cooperation among many agencies, Tribes, organizations, and the public, all of whom share responsibility in supporting and accomplishing this difficult task. This Springsnail Conservation Strategy is the result of close collaboration among the Nevada Department of Wildlife, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Nevada Division of Natural Heritage, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. We also thank the Bureau of Land Management, the US Forest Service, the National Park Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service for supporting and contributing to this effort. We thank the Museum of Northern Arizona in Flagstaff for administrative oversight, and the staff of MNA’s Springs Stewardship Institute for project coordination. In addition, we thank Dan Campbell, Peter Hovingh, Hsiu- Ping Liu, and Don Sada for expert advisement and editing early drafts of this report. We also thank countless others who contributed time and energy to this effort through the Springsnail Conservation Team (SCT) and externally. The Conservation Strategy for Springsnails in Nevada and Utah was prepared by the Springs Stewardship Institute for the SCT. The SCT provided valuable information, discussion, and editorial guidance throughout the development of this document, with focused collaboration by the following: Bureau of Land Management: Ali Helmig, Justin Jimenez, Corey Lange, Cassie Mellon, Sarah Peterson, Elin Pierce, and JA Vacca Museum of Northern Arizona Springs Stewardship Institute: Larry Stevens, with the assistance of Andrea Hazelton, Jeff Jenness, Jeri Ledbetter, Brianna Mann, and especially Alek Mendoza National Park Service: Mark Sappington and John Wullschleger Natural Resource Conservation Service: Matthew Phillippi Nevada Department of Wildlife: Chris Crookshanks, Kevin Guadalupe, and Jon Sjöberg Natural Resources Conservation Service: Matthew Phillippi and Clayton Schmitz Nevada Division of Natural Heritage: Eric Miskow and Kristin Szabo The Nature Conservancy: Sarah Byer, Laurel Saito, and Elaine York US Fish and Wildlife Service: Susan Abelel, Annalaura Averill-Murray, Sue Braumiller, Lee Ann Carranza, Corey Kallstrom, Chad Mellison, Jeri Sjoberg (retired), and George Weekly US Forest Service: John McCann, Cynthia Tait (retired), and Rachael VanHorne Utah Division of Wildlife Resources: Paul Badame, Erin Bertram, Drew Dittmer, Kate Holcomb, George Oliver, Kevin Wheeler, and Krissy Wilson (retired) CITATION Springsnail Conservation Team. 2020. Conservation Strategy for Springsnails in Nevada and Utah, Version 1.0. Nevada Department of Wildlife, Reno, and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City. 2 Table of Contents Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Glossary ............................................................... 5 Abbreviations and Acronyms ...............................................................................................5 Glossary ...............................................................................................................................6 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 10 1. Introduction, Purpose, Goals, Objectives, and Criteria ................................... 11 Introduction .......................................................................................................................11 Purpose..............................................................................................................................14 Goals .................................................................................................................................14 Objectives, Strategies, Actions, and Criteria ......................................................................14 2. Springsnail Evolution and Taxonomy .............................................................. 19 Springsnail Evolutionary History .......................................................................................19 Higher Taxonomy ..............................................................................................................20 Springsnail Species ............................................................................................................21 3. Geography and Landscape Context ................................................................. 32 Nevada and Utah Geography ............................................................................................32 Climate ..............................................................................................................................33 Land Management ............................................................................................................34 Springs Ecosystems ............................................................................................................34 Springs Ecosystem Types ...................................................................................................37 Springs Ecohydrology ........................................................................................................38 Ecological Characteristics of Springs .................................................................................38 4. Springsnail Ecology .......................................................................................... 40 Overview ...........................................................................................................................40 Habitat Requirements .......................................................................................................40 Abundance and Population Size ........................................................................................44 Diet and Feeding ...............................................................................................................45 Reproduction .....................................................................................................................45 Ecological Roles .................................................................................................................47 Associated Native Species .................................................................................................47 Population Linkage/Connectivity ......................................................................................47 5. Threat and Stressor Risk Assessment .............................................................. 48 Overview ...........................................................................................................................48 Habitat Degradation .........................................................................................................49 Over-use for Scientific, Educational, or Personal Collections .............................................54 Biological Factors ..............................................................................................................55 Other Factors .....................................................................................................................62 3 6. Conservation Program..................................................................................... 64 Introduction .......................................................................................................................64 Objective 1: Information Acquisition and Management....................................................64 Objective 2 – Identify, Assess, and Reduce Threats ...........................................................66 Objective 3: Conserve Habitats to Ensure Species Persistence...........................................72 Objective 4 – SCT Organization and Coordination .............................................................73 Objective 5: Education and Outreach for Springsnail Conservation ..................................75 7. Conclusions...................................................................................................... 76 References Cited ................................................................................................. 77 Appendices .......................................................................................................... 94 Appendix A: Summary Reports on Springsnail Species in Nevada and Utah ...... 95 Appendix B: Recommended Springsnail Inventory, Monitoring, and Collecting Protocols ............................................................................................................. 96 Introduction .......................................................................................................................96 Survey Equipment ..............................................................................................................98 Tier 1 Monitoring ...............................................................................................................98 Tier 2 Monitoring ...............................................................................................................98 Tier 3 Monitoring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886
    THE NAUTILUS 101(1):25-32, 1987 Page 25 . North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886 Robert Hershler Fred G. Thompson Department of Invertebrate Zoology Florida State Museum National Museum of Natural History University of Florida Smithsonian Institution Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Washington, DC 20560, USA ABSTRACT scribed) in the Southwest. Taylor (1966) placed Tryonia in the Littoridininae Taylor, 1966 on the basis of its Anatomical details are provided for the type species of Tryonia turreted shell and glandular penial lobes. It is clear from Stimpson, 1865, Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886, Fonteli- cella Gregg and Taylor, 1965, and Microamnicola Gregg and the initial descriptions and subsequent studies illustrat- Taylor, 1965, in an effort to resolve the systematic relationships ing the penis (Russell, 1971: fig. 4; Taylor, 1983:16-25) of these taxa, which represent most of the generic-level groups that Fontelicella and its subgenera, Natricola Gregg and of Hydrobiidae in southwestern North America. Based on these Taylor, 1965 and Microamnicola Gregg and Taylor, 1965 and other data presented either herein or in the literature, belong to the Nymphophilinae Taylor, 1966 (see Hyalopyrgus Thompson, 1968 is assigned to Tryonia; and Thompson, 1979). While the type species of Pyrgulop- Fontelicella, Microamnicola, Nat ricola Gregg and Taylor, 1965, sis, P. nevadensis (Stearns, 1883), has not received an- Marstonia F. C. Baker, 1926, and Mexistiobia Hershler, 1985 atomical study, the penes of several eastern species have are allocated to Pyrgulopsis. been examined by Thompson (1977), who suggested that The ranges of both Tryonia and Pyrgulopsis include parts the genus may be a nymphophiline.
    [Show full text]
  • Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona
    --- Springs of the Verde River Basin --- Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona This document was created by: Springs Stewardship Institute Museum of Northern Arizona 3101 N. Fort Valley Dr. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Under contract to: One for the Verde P.O. Box 2535 Cottonwood, AZ 86326 10/31/2018 Recommended Citation: Schenk, E.R.; Jenness, J.S.; and Stevens, L.E. 2018. Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona. Springs Stewardship Institute Technical Report to One for the Verde. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ. 47 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27113.95846 Springs Distribution, Flow, and Springs-dependent Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona Edward R. Schenk, Jeff S. Jenness, and Lawrence E. Stevens Springs Stewardship Institute Museum of Northern Arizona 3101 N. Fort Valley Dr. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 10/31/2018 Contents Executive Summary: .................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 The Springs Stewardship Institute and Springs Online ..................................................... 7 Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Results .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suterilla Fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006
    Suterilla fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006 Diagnostic features Shell globose to ovate-conic, up to 1.9 mm in length, thick, opaque, uniformly yellow-brown (white in some specimens); with narrow, open umbilicus. Teleoconch whorls convex, suture distinctly Distribution of Suterilla fluviatilis. Suterilla fluviatilis (adult size 1.6-1.9 mm) impressed; spire about equal to aperture in length; whorls smooth except for fine growth lines, fine spiral striae present or absent; aperture with thin outer lip and thick, wide columellar lip, inner lip thin across parietal area; aperture not extending across umbilicus; no varix. Operculum simple, pyriform , paucispiral, horny, translucent, yellowish. Head with short, narrow, cephalic tentacles approximately equal to half width of head with the eyes situated near central part of bases of these tentacles. A distinct transverse crease at posterior end of snout and confluent with anterior edges of tentacle bases. Omniphoric grooves distinct. Anterior pedal mucous gland along entire edge of foot, as many small, slender cells opening beneath inconspicuous propodial flap. Foot short and broad, sole slender, flat, smooth when foot extended. Mantle cavity with only two rudimentary gill filaments. The main differences between S. fluviatilis and other species of Suterilla (all of which are marine) are anatomical. They include the S-shaped rectum, lack of a flange on the penis, the albumen gland being markedly shorter than the capsule gland, a large bursa copulatrix (also in S. neozelanica) and a wide, folded bursal duct that enters the bursa mid anteriorly. Classification Suterilla fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006 Class Gastropoda I nfraclass Caenogastropoda Order Littorinida Suborder Rissoidina Superfamily Truncatelloidea Family Assimineidae Subfamily: Omphalotropidinae Genus Suterilla Thiele, 1927 (Type species Cirsonella neozelanica Murdoch, 1899).
    [Show full text]
  • The Assimineidae of the Atlantic-Mediterranean Seashores
    B72(4-6)_totaal-backup_corr:Basteria-basis.qxd 15-9-2008 10:35 Pagina 165 BASTERIA, 72: 165-181, 2008 The Assimineidae of the Atlantic-Mediterranean seashores J.J. VAN AARTSEN National Museum of Natural History, P.O.Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. A study of the Atlantic – and Mediterranean marine species of the genera Assiminea and Paludinella revealed several new species. The species Assiminea gittenbergeri spec. nov. is estab- lished in the Mediterranean. Assiminea avilai spec. nov. and Assiminea rolani spec. nov. have been found in Terceira, Azores and in Madeira respectively. A species from the Atlantic coast of France, cited as Assiminea eliae Paladilhe, 1875 by Thiele, is described as Paludinella glaubrechti spec. nov. A. eliae cannot be identified today as no type material is known. The name , howev- er, is used for several different species as documented herein. Assiminea ostiorum (Bavay, 1920) is here considered a species in its own right. Paludinella sicana ( Brugnone, 1876), until now con- sidered an exclusively Mediterranean species, has been detected along the Atlantic coast at Laredo ( Spain) in the north as well as at Agadir ( Morocco) in the south. Keywords: Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Assimineidae, Assiminea, Paludinella, systematics, Atlantic Ocean east coast, Mediterranean. INTRODUCTION The Assimineidae H. & A. Adams, 1856 are a group of mollusks living worldwide in brackish water, in freshwater as well as terrestrial habitats. In Europe there are only a few species known. They live in usually more or less brackish conditions high in the tidal zone, frequently along tidal mudflats. The two genera recognized to date are Paludinella Pfeiffer, 1841 with Paludinella littorina (Delle Chiaje, 1828) and Paludinella sicana (Brugnone, 1876) and the type-genus Assiminea Leach in Fleming, 1828, with the type- species Assiminea grayana (Fleming, 1828) as well as Assiminea eliae Paladilhe, 1875.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan Endangered and Species Nevada
    RECOVERYPLAN FOR THE ENDANGEREDAND THREATENED SPECIES OF&H MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda, Prosobranchia)
    BASTERIA, 64: 151-163, 2000 The genus Alzoniella Giusti & Bodon, 1984, in France. 1 West European Hydrobiidae, 9 (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) Hans+D. Boeters Karneidstrasse 8, D 81545 Munchen, Germany In France the genusAlzoniella Giusti & Bodon, 1984, is represented with two subgenera, viz. its nominate subgenus and Navarriella subgen. nov. The nominate subgenus comprises six three species, ofwhich are described as viz. A. haicabia A. new, (A.) spec. nov., (A.) junqua spec. A. nov. and A. (A.) provincialis spec. nov., next to (A.) navarrensis Boeters, 1999, A. (A.) perrisii and A. (Dupuy, 1851) (A.) pyrenaica (Boeters, 1983). The new subgenus is proposed for A. (Navarriella) elliptica (Paladilhe, 1874) only. A. (A.) perrisii (Dupuy, 1851) [Hydrobia], the first of this became known from is redefined and species genus that France, described here with two viz. A. and A. subspecies, (A.) p. perrisii (A.) p. irubensis subspec. nov. Key words: Gastropoda, Prosobranchia, Hydrobiidae, Alzoniella (Alzoniella) and Alzoniella (Navarriella), France. INTRODUCTION Giusti & Bodon (1984: 169) described Alzoniella for three eyeless, subterranean, hy- drobiid species from Italy, that might have evolved from small populations that locally survived the Quaternary glaciations. It turned out that Alzoniella is also represented in where mountain inhabited France, regions are that have partially been subject to gla- ciations, viz. the Pyrenees and the MediterraneanAlps. In these regions too, populations ofancestral have Alzoniella might survived locally by invading subterranean waters. This development apparently went less far than in for example Bythiospeum Bourguignat, 1882, andMoitessieria Bourguignat, 1863. Species of these two genera, which are eyeless stygobionts, occur not only in karstic waters, but also in the interstitium and in subter- ranean waters bordering river valleys such as that of the Rhone river (Boeters & Miiller be found 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Belgrandiella (Wagner 1927) (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Caves in Northern Bulgaria
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA Acta zool. bulg., 63 (1), 2011: 7-10 A New Species of Belgrandiella (Wagner 1927) (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Caves in Northern Bulgaria Dilian G. Georgiev Department of Ecology and Environmental Conservation, University of Plovdiv, Tzar Assen Str. 24, BG-4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria,email: [email protected] Abstract: A new species of Belgrandiella named Belgrandiella pandurskii n. sp. was described from three caves on Devetashko Plateau, North Bulgaria: Devetashka cave, Urushka Maara and Vodopada. The species is rheophilic, stenothermic and troglophilic one and the only species from this genus with a lobed penis known from Bulgaria till now. Key words: Hydrobiidae, new species, Balkans, stream Introduction The genus Belgrandiella (WAGNER , 1927) is one of and B. bachkovoensis) and one from Stara Zagora the most diverse one on species in Bulgaria from all town area (B. zagoraensis). Studies continued as the Hydrobiidae (ANGELOV 2000). All of the known GEORGIEV (2011) reported of some new localities species are endemics and live in restricted localities and anatomical features of some taxa of Hydrobiid as caves and springs in the country. The first spe- snails. The B. pussila was found in Temnata Dupka cies was described by WAGNER (1927) from Temnata cave (Lakatnik) by empty shells, and B. angelovi in Dupka cave near Lakatnik and named Belgrandia springs near village of Zeleno Darvo (Gabrovo) and (Belgrandiella) hessei (WAGNER , 1927). About 30 its penis morphology was studied. years later ANGELOV (1959) described B. pussila Our summary of the literature on the Bulgarian ANGELOV 1959 from the nearby source of Petreska Belgrandiella showed that even this genus is pos- River.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole
    Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole (Microtus californicus scirpensis) ( As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the ~ Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environ mental and cultural values of our national parks ~, and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energyand mineral resourcesand works toassure that ~‘ theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall our people. ~4 The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people ~<‘ who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. AMARGOSA VOLE (Microtus cahfornicus scirpensis) RECOVERY PLAN September, 1997 7— U.S. Department ofthe Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region One, Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: Updated Checklist, Endemicity Hotspots, Threats and Conservation Status
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e912909 Taxonomy and systematics The freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: updated checklist, endemicity hotspots, threats and conservation status Los caracoles dulceacuícolas (Mollusca: Gastropoda) de México: listado actualizado, hotspots de endemicidad, amenazas y estado de conservación Alexander Czaja a, *, Iris Gabriela Meza-Sánchez a, José Luis Estrada-Rodríguez a, Ulises Romero-Méndez a, Jorge Sáenz-Mata a, Verónica Ávila-Rodríguez a, Jorge Luis Becerra-López a, Josué Raymundo Estrada-Arellano a, Gabriel Fernando Cardoza-Martínez a, David Ramiro Aguillón-Gutiérrez a, Diana Gabriela Cordero-Torres a, Alan P. Covich b a Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Av.Universidad s/n, Fraccionamiento Filadelfia, 35010 Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico b Institute of Ecology, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602-2202, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] (A. Czaja) Received: 14 April 2019; accepted: 6 November 2019 Abstract We present an updated checklist of native Mexican freshwater gastropods with data on their general distribution, hotspots of endemicity, threats, and for the first time, their estimated conservation status. The list contains 193 species, representing 13 families and 61 genera. Of these, 103 species (53.4%) and 12 genera are endemic to Mexico, and 75 species are considered local endemics because of their restricted distribution to very small areas. Using NatureServe Ranking, 9 species (4.7%) are considered possibly or presumably extinct, 40 (20.7%) are critically imperiled, 30 (15.5%) are imperiled, 15 (7.8%) are vulnerable and only 64 (33.2%) are currently stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for Beaverpond Marstonia
    Species Status Assessment Report For Beaverpond Marstonia (Marstonia castor) Marstonia castor. Photo by Fred Thompson Version 1.0 September 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia 1 2 This document was prepared by Tamara Johnson (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Georgia Ecological Services Field Office) with assistance from Andreas Moshogianis, Marshall Williams and Erin Rivenbark with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Southeast Regional Office, and Don Imm (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Georgia Ecological Services Field Office). Maps and GIS expertise were provided by Jose Barrios with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Southeast Regional Office. We appreciate Gerald Dinkins (Dinkins Biological Consulting), Paul Johnson (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources), and Jason Wisniewski (Georgia Department of Natural Resources) for providing peer review of a prior draft of this report. 3 Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for beaverpond marstonia. Version 1.0. September, 2017. Atlanta, GA. 24 pp. 4 Species Status Assessment Report for Beaverpond Marstonia (Marstonia castor) Prepared by the Georgia Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for beaverpond marstonia (Marstonia castor), and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and extinction risk. Beaverpond marstonia is a small spring snail found in tributaries located east of Lake Blackshear in Crisp, Worth, and Dougherty Counties, Georgia. It was last documented in 2000. Based on the results of repeated surveys by qualified species experts, there appears to be no extant populations of beaverpond marstonia.
    [Show full text]