The High, Plain, Yet Dizzy Ground of Influence: American Views on Regime Change and the European Revolution of 1848

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The High, Plain, Yet Dizzy Ground of Influence: American Views on Regime Change and the European Revolution of 1848 THE HIGH, PLAIN, YET DIZZY GROUND OF INFLUENCE: AMERICAN VIEWS ON REGIME CHANGE AND THE EUROPEAN REVOLUTION OF 1848 Patrick J. Garrity Miller Center of Public Affairs University of Virginia November 2009 Working Paper Series on American Foreign Policy and Regime Change John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs Ashland University Working Paper Series on American Foreign Policy and Regime Change from the Ashbrook Center THE HIGH, PLAIN, YET DIZZY GROUND OF INFLUENCE: AMERICAN VIEWS ON REGIME CHANGE AND THE EUROPEAN REVOLUTION OF 1848 by Patrick J. Garrity This Working Paper examines Amer- right under the law of nations to utter ican attitudes towards the European Revolu- one word of complaint, still less to tions of 1848 and the national debate over retaliate by war.”1 whether and how, to support foreign political reforms and regime change. This Webster was in many ways the foreign policy debate was in many respects central character in this mid-19th century the most “modern” of those which took search for ways to maximize American place during the American Republic’s first influence in favor of regime change without century, in that the protagonists anticipated crossing the line into direct political-military many of the arguments and policy options intervention. Webster’s soaring rhetoric that later emerged when the United States about human liberty seemingly put him on became a world power. Most of the the side of those who challenged the proposals for an active U.S. response to the perceived tradition of American non- Revolutions of 1848 (but not all) stopped involvement in the political affairs of short of military intervention and focused on Europe. But at the same time, Webster’s the ability of the United States to shape official actions were cautious, taking into world public opinion in a way that would account the fragile state of the Union and the facilitate the cause of human rights and limits of American power. liberalized regimes. Rufus Choate, a leading This Working Paper begins with a Massachusetts politician and orator, aptly brief discussion of the historical background captured this perspective when he described of the U.S. approach to regime change as the approach of his friend, Senator and later news of the Revolutions of 1848 first Secretary of State Daniel Webster. reached the American shore. The intel- lectual and political impetus for a more . to occupy the high, plain, yet assertive approach to foreign policy and for dizzy ground which separates influ- the promotion of foreign regime change ence from intervention, to avow and came largely from a new generation of promulgate warm good-will to hu- Democrats, who sought to advance Ameri- manity, wherever striving to be free, to inquire authentically into the The author would like to acknowledge the assistance history of its struggles, to take offi- of Benjamin Kunkel and Joshua Distel of the cial and avowed pains to ascertain Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland the moment when its success may be University, for their assistance in the preparation of recognized, consistently, ever, with this Working Paper. the great code that keeps the peace of 1 Samuel Gilman Brown, ed., The Works of Rufus the world, abstaining from every- Choate, with a Memoir of his Life, 2 vols. (Boston: thing which shall give any nation a Little, Brown and Company, 1862), I: 520. 3 The High, Plain, Yet Dizzy Ground of Influence: American Views on Regime Change and the European Revolution of 1848 can interests and ideals through territorial rhetorical support for the latest experiment expansion, free trade, and support for liberal in French republicanism. This section movements abroad. The New Democrats examines closely the arguments of the most sought to overcome factional and intel- prominent advocate of caution in response to lectual resistance to such activism from foreign regime change, South Carolina within their own party and from the opposi- Democrat John C. Calhoun. Calhoun’s ex- tion Whigs, who traditionally held that pressions of caution generated the first America’s world-historic mission was one major defense of an activist foreign policy of democratic example rather than the towards the French Revolution from leading conquest of foreign territories or the sub- Democratic Senators such as Michigan’s version of other regimes. Nevertheless, the Lewis Cass and Illinois’ Stephen A. Whig persuasion also contained a strain of Douglas. Those who wanted to use the activism on behalf of human rights, French Revolution as a means to highlight especially strong rhetorical support for their opposition to slavery and American republican government and national self- territorial expansion soon diverted the determination. The New Democrats thus had debate, however, especially in the House of potential allies among up-and-coming pro- Representatives. gressive Whig politicians and advocates of As the revolutions spread across the the Free Soil movement. This raised the continent, the American government and prospect that a political majority might public had to grapple with the policy issues emerge across parties in favor of a more raised by other forms regime change, activist or even interventionist foreign including the unification of Germany policy – a national majority that might trans- (presumably but not necessarily on repub- cend differences over slavery. lican and confederal lines); and the auto- The possibility of such a domestic nomy or independence of Hungary from the political coalition first emerged when the Hapsburg Empire. Section III reviews the unpopular July Monarchy of Louis-Philippe approaches of the Polk (Democrat) and was overthrown by yet another French Taylor-Fillmore (Whig) administrations Revolution in February 1848. Section II towards these developments. Both admini- considers the official and unofficial Ameri- strations adopted or embraced diplomatic can reactions to this revolution. The U.S. policies that were sympathetic towards the Minister in Paris, Richard Rush, almost prospective new regimes but that stopped immediately recognized the new Republic, short of outright intervention. Congres- an action that was ratified by the Polk sional members again debated whether and administration on the grounds that early and how the United States should proceed, favorable U.S. action towards republican especially after Austria, with the aid of government in Europe could encourage and Russian troops, suppressed the Hungarian strengthen the stable development of such Revolution. Cass and Whig grandee Henry regimes. The U.S. Congress – then in the Clay argued about the former’s proposal to midst of controversy over ratification of withdraw U.S. diplomatic recognition of peace with Mexico – debated the wisdom of Austria to protest the intervention and to a policy of active encouragement of repub- signal American support for a future lican governments in France and elsewhere Hungarian independence movement. Whig in Europe. These deliberations revealed sub- Secretary of State John Clayton and his stantial opposition among Southern Demo- successor, Daniel Webster, engaged in an crats and conservative Whigs even to acrimonious public controversy with 4 Working Paper Series on American Foreign Policy and Regime Change from the Ashbrook Center Austrian diplomat, the Baron Hülsemann, As noted in Section V, these about his allegations of improper American conservative Whigs, aligned with the Fill- interference in Austro-Hungarian affairs. more administration, and a strong majority The Hülsemann dispute provided additional of Southerners of both parties, constituted an grist for Congressional advocates and critics effective opposition to the New Democrats of an activist American foreign policy. and progressive Whigs on the Kossuth issue. Section IV examines the most As the nation slid deeper into domestic crisis important of these public debates over the over slavery during the 1850s, the prospect proper American approach towards regime of a new political coalition based on an change, which was triggered by the assertive foreign policy and an aggressive appearance of the Hungarian revolutionary approach to foreign regime change, leader Lajos (Louis) Kossuth. The Taylor disappeared. administration successfully urged Kossuth’s This Working Paper does not attempt release from confinement in Turkey and, to provide a comprehensive or definitive with Congressional approval, dispatched a account of the American response to the U.S. frigate to convey him to the United Revolutions of 1848, but rather to highlight States, where presumably he would live out the substantive arguments that emerged his life in quiet exile. But Kossuth and during the public debate. Three limitations many of his American supporters saw his must be noted in particular. First, the release merely as the next step in a second controversy over the future of slavery Hungarian Revolution, which would be increasingly dominated American domestic enabled (according to his most aggressive politics and affected the debate over the U.S. supporters) by an American-British- proper response to the European revolutions. Turkish military alliance directed at Austria The Paper identifies the points at which the and Russia; or by some other type of foreign policy debate was directly affected “intervention for non-intervention.” But by arguments about the peculiar institution; most New Democrats, such as Douglas, and but the entire subtext cannot be disentangled progressive Whigs, including New York entirely in a limited
Recommended publications
  • GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
    NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864)
    Chapter Thirty-four “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864) The political tide began turning on August 29 when the Democratic national convention met in Chicago, where Peace Democrats were unwilling to remain in the background. Lincoln had accurately predicted that the delegates “must nominate a Peace Democrat on a war platform, or a War Democrat on a peace platform; and I personally can’t say that I care much which they do.”1 The convention took the latter course, nominating George McClellan for president and adopting a platform which declared the war “four years of failure” and demanded that “immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the states, or other peaceable means, to the end that, at the earliest practicable moment, peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal Union of the States.” This “peace plank,” the handiwork of Clement L. Vallandigham, implicitly rejected Lincoln’s Niagara Manifesto; the Democrats would require only union as a condition for peace, whereas the Republicans insisted on union and emancipation. The platform also called for the restoration of “the rights of the States 1 Noah Brooks, Washington, D.C., in Lincoln’s Time, ed. Herbert Mitgang (1895; Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 164. 3726 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 34 unimpaired,” which implied the preservation of slavery.2 As McClellan’s running mate, the delegates chose Ohio Congressman George Pendleton, a thoroughgoing opponent of the war who had voted against supplies for the army. As the nation waited day after day to see how McClellan would react, Lincoln wittily opined that Little Mac “must be intrenching.” More seriously, he added that the general “doesn’t know yet whether he will accept or decline.
    [Show full text]
  • IMLAY Nina E. Infant D. 18 May 1899 at Northport; Spinal Meningitis; Daughter of Charles Imlay of Northport INGALLS John V
    IMLAY Nina E. infant d. 18 May 1899 at Northport; spinal meningitis; daughter of Charles Imlay of Northport INGALLS John V. d. 16August 1900 at Las Vegas, New Mexico; throat trouble; [interment at Atchinson, Kansas]; “the history of his life was that of a poor boy who arose to name and fame through unremitting toil”; [native of Middleton, Massachusetts, b. 29 December 1833; moved to Kansas in 1858 and soon became involved in Kansas politics; newspaper editor in Atchinson, Kansas]; U. S. Senator [from Kansas 1873-1891 and President ProTem of the U. S. Senate 1887-1891]; resident of Atcinson, Kansas INGELOW Jean 76 years d. 20 July 1897 at London, England; “distinguished poet and novelist ... has a wide popularity in the United States”; native of Boston, England; born 1820 INGERSOLL Col. Robert G. d. 21 July 1899 at Dobb’s Ferry, N. Y.; apoplexy; funeral at Dobb’s Ferry at which his various writings were read; cremation at Fresh Pond, L. I.; unnamed widow survives; father of Mrs. Walston H. Brown and Maude Ingersoll; native of Dresden, N. Y. (b. 1833), son of a Congregationalist minister; “noted infidel lecturer”; grew up in Illinois; served in the Civil War as colonel of the 11th Illinois; leading Republican party political figure; “his fame came through his lectures and writings antagonizing the Christian faith” INGRAHAM Winifred 17 years d. 7 August 1893 at Lattingtown; daughter of H. M. H. Ingraham INMAN Robert drowned 26 August 1895 in collision of his yacht Adelaide and the steamer Pereus in New York Harbor; all others aboard the yacht at the time of the collision were rescued; body washed ashore at South Beach, Staten Island; “Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • German Migration to Missouri
    Andrew Stuart Bergerson | Thorsten Logge (Eds.) GERMAN MIGRATION TO MISSOURI A TRANSNATIONAL STUDENT RESEARCH PROJECT [1.0/2019] Andrew Stuart Bergerson, Thorsten Logge (Eds.): German Migration to Missouri in the 19th Century. A Transnational Student Research Project [1.0/2019] Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-dnb.de abrufbar. Veröffentlicht durch die Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Hamburg Titelbild: “A stretch of the Missouri River between Rocheport, MO and Boonville, MO” (cropped and edited) by Aimee Castenell, CC BY-NC 2.0 ISBN 978-3-946246-19-0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Moun- tain View, CA 94042, USA. Andrew S. Bergerson | Thorsten Logge Foreword: German Migration to Missouri – A Transnational Learning Experience ...........................................4 Jude Carmona Who’s In? Who Stays? The Effect of U.S. Legislation on German Migration in the 19th century ........................7 Alexander Banks | Michael Spachek German-Americans and Slavery .................................................................................................................14 Amy Lutz | Meghan O’Brien | Pascal Küther Thekla Bernays (1856-1931):
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Historical Revi Ew
    MISSOURI HISTORICAL REVI EW, CONTENTS "Oursel's As ithers See Us" Floyd C. Shoemaker The Pony Express Celebration Louise Piatt Hauck A Century of Missouri Music Ernst C. Krohn Missourians Abroad—Henry L. Myers T. A. Johnston The New Journalism in Missouri Walter B. Stevens The Followers of Duden William G. Bek J ay hawkers in Missouri, 1858-1863 Bildegarde R. Herklots Historical Notes and Comments STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY */* MISSOURI JULY, 1923 THE MISSOURI HISTORICAL REVIEW Vol. XVII July, 1923 No. 4 CONTENTS. " Oursel's As Ithers See Us" 419 FLOTD C. SHOEMAKER The Pony Express Celebration 435 LOUISE PLATT HAUCK A Century of Missouri Music 440 ERNST C. KROHN Missourians Abroad—Henry L. Myers 464 T. A. JOHNSTON The New Journalism in Missouri 470 WALTER B. STEVENS The Followers of Duden 479 WILLIAM G. BEK Jayhawkers in Missouri, 1858-1863 505 HlLDEGARDE R. HERKLOTZ Historical Notes and Comments 514 FLOYD C. SHOEMAKER, Editor The Missouri Historical Review is published quarterly. The subscription price is $1.00 a year. A complete set of the REVIEW is still obtainable—Vols. 1-16, bound, $65.00; unbound, $32.00. Prices of separate volumes given on request. All communications should be addressed to Floyd C. Shoemaker, Secretary, The State Historical Society of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. "Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Columbia, Missouri, under act of Congress, Oct. 8, 1917, Sec. W-" CONTRIBUTORS FLOYD C. SHOEMAKER, author and historian, is secretary of The State Historical Society of Missouri and editor of The Missouri Historical Review. He is the author of papers, monographs, and histories on Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Belleville, Illinois. Pub:1951
    L I E) RAR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS 377. 389 Na7K SURVei ILL. HIST. A HISTORY OF BELLEVILLE BY Alvin Louis Nebelsick, B.S.; A.M. Head of Department of Social Studies Township High School and Junior College Belleville, Illinois rv ' /v ^ DEDICATION This work is affectionately dedicated to the Pioneers and Progressive Citizens of Our City of Belleville, Illinois. ^ o^ VI PREFACE This volume is largely the result of an inspiration for writing acquired as co-author of two magazine articles, one in our state professional magazine, "Illinois Education," May, 1937, and the other in a national professional magazine, "Social Studies," February, 1939. I have discovered that there is an appalling lack of information about local communities among the citizens as a whole. I believe community interest should always be encouraged. Surely we need not be reminded that the very foundation of democratic government is to be found in the communities and in the ability of the citizens to deal success- fully with their local problems. To understand these problems is a complicated matter so we must plan intelligently. This I believe impossible without a knowledge of our past. Our history is so much alive and growing that I find it hard to see how anyone can think of it as dead and dry. History always looks forward, not backward; it is dynamic, not static. Out of the world of yesterday, the world of today has grown; out of the world of today, will come the world of tomorrow. It is impossible to understand fully the present without a knowledge of the conditions which have brought it about; and it is equally impossible to make intelligent decisions for the future as we have only an uncomprehending view of the age in which we live.
    [Show full text]
  • Saber and Scroll Journal Volume VI Issue II Spring-Summer 2017 Saber
    Saber and Scroll Journal Volume VI Issue II Spring-Summer 2017 Saber and Scroll Historical Society 1 © Saber and Scroll Historical Society, 2018 Logo Design: Julian Maxwell Cover Design: Ruthenian woman, photograph by Augustus Sherman, c. 1906. Members of the Saber and Scroll Historical Society, the volunteer staff at the Saber and Scroll Journal publishes quarterly. saberandscroll.weebly.com 2 Journal Staff Editor in Chief Michael Majerczyk Copy Editors Anne Midgley, Michael Majerczyk Content Editors Jeff Ballard, Tormod Engvig, Mike Gottert, Kathleen Guler, William F. Laawson, Michael Majerczyk, Anne Midgley, Jack Morato, Chris Schloemer, Christopher Sheline Proofreaders Aida Dias, Tormod Engvig, Frank Hoeflinger, Anne Midgley, Michael Majerczyk, Jack Morato, John Persinger, Chris Schloemer, Christopher Sheline, Susanne Watts Webmaster Michael Majerczyk Academic Advisors Emily Herff, Dr. Robert Smith, Jennifer Thompson 3 Contents Letter from the Editor 5 Marie Paradis and the French-Canadian Connection: Quebec’s Impact on the United States 7 Anne Midgley A Passion for Liberty: German Immigrants in the Creation of the Republican Party and the Election of Lincoln 31 Molly L. Fischer Strange Bedfellows: Nativism, Know-Nothings, African-Americans, and School Desegregation In Antebellum Massachusetts 51 Stan Prager The Impact of Carpatho-Rusyn Immigrants and Their Descendants on the United States 77 Daniel Rosko Conflicting Pre-colonial Relations as Foundations of Frosty Associations between the Aghem and Their Neighbours in Colonial Administrative Units 1921-1937 Protus Mbeum Tem, PhD 89 Exhibit and Book Reviews 107 4 Letter from the Editor Hi everyone. I hope you are well. I want to thank everyone who contributes to our journal and provides support, including our authors, Saber and Scroll leadership, our academic advisors, the journal team, and of course, the American Public University System.
    [Show full text]
  • 43Rd Illinois History
    43rd Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment “Koerner Regiment” The 43rd Illinois was recruited throughout the state, to include Chicago, Peoria, Quincy, Rock Island, Galesburg, Springfield and elsewhere from principally Immigrant & First Generation German-American’s, the largest core group of the Regiment came from St. Clair County. All three of it’s Commanders came from this region (Raith, Engelmann & Dengler). ! Recruiting Poster for the “Unattached German Regiment for Illinois” The idea of the Regiment was that of Gustav Koerner, and he sent a letter, on 24 July, 1861 to Senator Trumbull and President Lincoln, asking for permission to form an “All German Regiment”. However the red tape of Washington DC, prevented a quick answer and many of the dissatisfied soldiers who left the 9th Illinois (after their three month enlistment), joined the 12th Missouri, under Peter J. Osterhaus. Koerner seeing many a good soldier join Missouri Regiment, appealed to Governor Yates who immediately accepted his idea as part of the second call of troops. Once permission was granted, Mexican War veterans Captain Julius Raith and Lieutenant Adolph Engelmann (who was the brother in law of Koerner) were some of the first to enlist, and became very instrumental in recruiting area Germans into war service. Koerner was successful in getting seven companies of men to Springfield by September 1st, 1861. Colonel Julius Raith was the regiment’s first Commanding Officer, as appointed by Governor Yates, but the unit would name itself the “Koerner Regiment“. Julius Raith was born on 29 March 1820; in Goppingen, Wurtemberg. At an early age he showed great abilities as an engineer and his father gave him a fitting education.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Friend, As Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Gustav Koerner and Abraham Lincoln Changed America
    Civil War Book Review Winter 2015 Article 6 Your Friend, as Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Gustav Koerner and Abraham Lincoln Changed America Alison Efford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Efford, Alison (2015) "Your Friend, as Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Gustav Koerner and Abraham Lincoln Changed America," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 17 : Iss. 1 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.17.1.07 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol17/iss1/6 Efford: Your Friend, as Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Review Efford, Alison Winter 2015 Allendorf, Donald Your Friend, As Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Gustav Koerner and Abraham Lincoln Changed America. Pelican Publishing, $26.95 ISBN 9781455618835 German Americans, Abraham Lincoln, and the Republican Party As a retired marketing executive, Donald Allendorf must appreciate the power of an ambitious title. Your Friend, As Ever, A. Lincoln: How the Unlikely Friendship of Gustav Koerner and Abraham Lincoln Changed America promises intimate revelations and a reinterpretation of United States history. Readers should be skeptical. Yet the relationship between Koerner and Lincoln does merit serious consideration. Koerner, a significant Illinois politician and prominent German American, helped Lincoln win the Republican nomination for the presidency in 1860. As Allendorf narrates, Koerner and Lincoln were both born in 1809, but they were raised under quite different circumstances. While Lincoln was struggling in frontier Kentucky and Indiana, Koerner’s family was running a successful publishing and bookselling operation in Frankfurt am Main. German nationalism and democratic politics were mainstays in the Koerner household, so it was no surprise that Gustav participated in radical student organizations when he went off to university.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms Scandal of 1870-1872: Immigrant Liberal Republicans and America’S Place in the World Alison Clark Efford Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette History Faculty Research and Publications History, Department of 1-1-2018 The Arms Scandal of 1870-1872: Immigrant Liberal Republicans and America’s Place in the World Alison Clark Efford Marquette University, [email protected] "The Arms Scandal of 1870-1872: Immigrant Liberal Republicans and America’s Place in the World," in Reconstruction in a Globalizing World by David Prior. New York : Fordham University Press, 2018: 94-120. Publisher link. ©2018 Fordham University Press. Used with permission. The Arms Scandal 4 of 1870-1872 Immigrant Liberal Republicans and America's Place in the World Alison Clark Efford n February 20, 1872, future president James A. Garfield wrote in his diary that Senator Carl Schurz had just made "the most brilliant senato­ 0 rial speech of his life."1 That was no small compliment, given Schurz's renown as an orator. He had begun public speaking in 1848, rousing restive Ger­ mans as a student revolutionary. When the uprisings failed the following year, he moved to the United States, where he quickly learned English and went on to much greater acclaim. Abraham Lincoln praised his work on the stump in 1860, rewarding him first with a position as United States minister to Spain and later with a commission as a brigadier general in the Union army.2 After the Civil War, Schurz turned his rhetorical talents to the cause of black suffrage. It was as a Radical Republican as well as a leader of German Americans that Schurz was selected to represent Missouri in the Senate in 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • A Heritage Deferred: the German-Americans in Minnesota. INSTITUTION Concordia Coll., Moorhead, Minn
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 275 571 SO 017 315 AUTHOR Glasrud, Clarence A., Ed. TITLE A Heritage Deferred: The German-Americans in Minnesota. INSTITUTION Concordia Coll., Moorhead, Minn. SPONS AGENCY Minnesota Humanities Commission, St. Paul.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 79 NOTE 170p.; Papers presented at two conferences on the German-American Heritage (Moorhead, MN, October 12, 1979 and St. Paul, MN, October 19-20, 1979). Photographs may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROM International Language Villages, Concordia College, Moorhead, MN 56560 (write for price). PUB TYPE Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021)-- Historical Materials (060) -- Reports- General (140) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Architectural Character; *Cultural Awareness; *Cultural Background; Education; *Ethnic Groups; *Ethnicity; Ethnic Origins; Foreign Countries; Global Approach; Higher Education; *Immigrants; Political Attitudes; Religion; Secondary Education IDENTIFIERS *Minnesota; *West Germany ABSTRACT This collection of conference papers explores aspects of the lives of German-American immigrants in Minnesota. Part 1, "The Ethnic Experience," consists of the following papers: "Was Therea Single German-American Experience?" (Bonney); "The Most Diversified Ethnic Group" (Johnson); "Unraveling the Mystery of Ethnic Identity" (Ward); and "Some General Questions Concerning the Maintenance of Ethnicity" (Bradunas). Part 2, "Architectural Styles and Material Culture," consists of the following
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Culture of the Ohio Valley in the Nineteenth Century
    "As My Father's Child Has": The Political Culture of the Ohio Valley in the Nineteenth Century Nicole Etcheson In 1816, Thomas Lincoln moved his wife and argued, the Ohio Valley was the "Valley of two children across the Ohio River from Kentucky Democracy," the Turnerian frontier where settlers into Indiana. Lincoln followed the path of many forged an individualistic society that rejected elitist other settlers. Born in Virginia during the politics of the East.^ Thomas's son would later epito- Revolution, his family had moved to Kentucky when mize that dream of upward political mobility and the he was five. There Indians killed his father. With ideals of a democratic society when he told Ohio sol- only a minimum of education, but able to sign his diers at the end of the Civil War, "I happen, tem- own name, Thomas worked as a hired laborer, a porarily, to occupy this big White House. I am a liv- skilled carpenter, and eventually bought his own ing witness that any one of your children may look to farm. That purchase garnered him political rights as come here as my father's child has."4 well as property and he served as a juryman and Scholars now dispute Barnhart's conclusion that patroller against the Indians. Thomas was a "respect- political culture paid as much attention to democra- ed citizen of a growing community" in Kentucky cy as contemporaries claimed. This may have been when he moved his family.1 true during the frontier period, as Elizabeth A. In Indiana, Lincoln sought secure title to his Perkins suggests for settlers in Kentucky, but as the land.
    [Show full text]