TAXONOMICA ARANEAE I: , THERAPHOSIDAE, AND DIPLURIDAE (ARANEAE)

ROBERT J. RAVEN

Raven, R.J. 2000 06 30: Taxonomica Araneae I: Barychelidae, Theraphosidae, Nemesiidae and Dipluridac (Araneae). Memoirs ofthe Queensland Museum 45(2): 569-575. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835.

In the Barychelidae, Idioctis sierramadrensis Barrion & Litsinger, 1995 is placed in the

synonymy of Rhianodes atratiis (Thorell, 1 890) and Aganippe hancrofti Rainbow & Pulleine, 1918 is transferred to the barychelid Trittame. In the Theraphosidae,

Phlogielhis Pocock, 1 897 is the senior synonym ofBaccallhrapo Barrion & Litsinger, 1 995; Chilocosmia Schmidt & von Wirth, 1992 and Selenopetma Schmidt & Rrausc, 1995 are

newly placed in the synonymy of Se/enocosmia along with Phlogius Simon, 1 887 which is replaced into synonymy. In the Nemesiidae, Chenistonia is removed from the synonymy of and includes only species of the Aname maculata group of Raven, 1984. The contentious question of the identil\^ of Aname divers/color Hogg, 1902 is revisited. The invalidly designated neotype is used as the t>'pe ofAname mainae, sp. nov. In the Dipluridac,

the Dominican amber fossil genus, Microsteria Wunderlich, 1 988, is placed in the synonymy

oTMasteria L. Koch, 1 873. , , . Australia, amber, fossil

Robert J. Raven, Queensland Museum. PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4I0I, Australia; 20 April 2000.

A number of new taxa and nomenclatural (1988: 2) and its descriptive statement is also changes have occurred in mygalomorph spiders essentially that of Raven (1988). The figures of in southeast Asia, Australia and fossils from the Idioctis sierramadrensis are of sufficient detail to Dominican amber since Main (1985) and Raven clarify its true identity. The species is clearly not (1985b). Some have been a result of taxonomic referable to Idioctis, The eye group is too deep, revisions. Some have been isolated descriptions. the sternum is ^is long as wide' not about 1.5 Some have been forced as a result of wider times w ider than long, the shape ofthe carapace is changes. Most changes do not require full ovoid, not elongate, and the abdomen is dark with revisions but only a briefnote. That is the purpose patterning. All of these are the characters of the of this series. monotypic Rhianodes into which genus the

Institutional and morphological abbreviations species is here transferred. follow those of Raven (1985a). The long spines overhanging the chelicerae are

mentioned by Raven ( 1994) in R. atratus, and the BARYCHELIDAE palp and diagnostic first leg ofthe male ofIdioctis sierranuidrensis do not show differences from Rhianodes atratus (Thorell, 1890) that of R. atratus. Hence, I am transferring the

Rhiamis atraUis Thorell, 1 890: 277; Roewcr, 1 942: 224. species into the synonymy of R. atratus. Rhianodes atratus: Ra\ en. 1994: 697; Platnick, 1998: 143. Idioctis sierramadrensis Barrion & Litsinger, 1995: 25; DISTRIBUTION. Singapore, Malaysia, Platnick, 1998: 137. (New synonymy) Philippines. Raven (1994) incorrectly listed

Maxwell's Hill in Singapore; it is in Malaysia. MATERIAL. HOLOTYPE: 6, Philippines, Quezon This is the first report of the species from the Prov., Real, Llavac VilL, R Apostol, 16 Jan 1985; in Philippines. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines. Trittame bancrofti (Rainbow & Pulleine, REMARKS. Barrion & Litsinger { 1 995) described 1918), comb. nov. a new Idioctis based on a male and juvenile (Fig. female from slash and bum upland rice fields in 1) the Philippines on Luzon Island. However, Aganippe hancrofti Rainbow & Pulleine, 1918: 95; Main, 1985: 14. Idioctis is an intertidal (Raven, 1988, Churchill Raven, 1992, Raven, 1994) known & MATERIAL. LECTOTYPE: (designated Main, 1985: 14), rarely far from the littoral zone. The diagnosis of AMKS 6151, Eidsvold, SE Qld; 9, paralectotype, same Idioctis given by Barrion & Litsinger (1995) is a data;KS6152, 9p^rd\QcXo\\^,Anamedistincta{R2\nho\\\ slightly changed version of that given by Raven 1914,det.RIR). )

570 MEMOIRS OF TllE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM

DIAGNOSIS. Females shajrc

with those p( J. gracilis the pitseoBe*oftbcmT spines 0-4

strofig) oti patellae 11 1 and we ! I developed posterior median .spinnerets bul differ In thai the cheliccrac iackarastellum. the ALE are clearly ijiore than ll^r diaoi^t^ -and the rR^MARKS. TrWs transfer ^ISO removes Ihe secoiidar)'' hotnonymy vvilh Aganippe bufurofti idemified bv Main, 1985. Raven 1994) failed to deal with this species 4i&ted by Maiaii983) a& incertae scdisr in the Skry- chclidac. The leelolypc has dense claw tulls. numerous FlCi. I. Tririame bancrqfti (Rainbow & Pulleine, I9t8), lectoiype fenmle, • maxillar) euspules, no labial AMKSti]52. A, canjpsipe; B^spennathecae;C, eyes. Scale bars I mm.

cuspui^s £nid $hon PJUS and is Baccallhrapo alone arc adequate to support the ctedrl^f Tn-ktam. Raftibbw Pulleinfi's type & recognition of a new genus and the variability series also includes a female distmcla Aname falls adequately within ilie known generic which, by default also is paralcctoiype, a variation. The types have a third claw and This increases Ihe already higJi beta di\ ersiiy of cracked tarsus IV, boiii characters ofP^lbgf^US Triffauie in southeast Queensland. Although (see Raven, 1985b), R Inwdokalbo i^ixa^}^ in some in the area are known jOtily ftflm one sex, having tarsi 111 and TV cracked. tbefei&no doubt 1ha| thespeCks is distinct irom Man) references to Sc/fnoco.^nua in (he -mhers In the region. Thtt thom spines on the rainlorciitii of north Queensland should mostly patella were found by Raven (1990) lo be present likely be ifeEerred iQ Pkiogiel/us. Queensland in both males and females ofT gn7ci}i\_ Hence. T. Museuiij. ra^^f {iet^in&i by |UR) include i':i

THERArtlQSapiAE SelcntK'Oimiit Ausserer, J87h "204. Type specie? by iiiOrioivp>" A/i,i^f/t' javtvitrfsfs Wjlckenaer, 1837. Tspe iPtilogtellus Pocoek^ Wtf. presumed losi. Phricniy K-uctL ltv74; 4^S- i^pc species. b> i"nonoi\pv. f^hh^it-nns Pocock. IS97: 595: Raven. 1985b: 1 18. Phricius crassipcs Ki^c\\. 1K74. \\{*<^ in ZMII. cxuTTiinLTl. BacLiHihrapo Bunion & Liisinuer, 1995; 21; Platnick, 1998: Phlt>s;i}f: Simon. I8K7: cxcv. replacement name \or Phnciits- 153. r>(ic spcci«$. Baccalikftupo hitndokalha Barrion £l koch. IN74 preoccupied b\ Phruiii.\ SpiiioJj, ]H59 in the Litsingef, tm llemipicra: Schmidt. 1995; 10. Replaced into svnonymy.

I'sop/iopuvM Thorell, 1897: 1 75, type species by subsequent MATEfHAL. HOLOTYPE: Baccallhrapo hundnhilho. deiignahon of Bonnci ( 1 958: 3825), FhrktNs vaiidus Philippines, LagunaProv.SinjJoan.Mag^a\^iv VilL. 16 TboroIU ISai. First ^nonymised by Simon, 1903: Jan !^85, A, Bamon, Perez. PARAr\*PES:'Subadult M. C*l/fflW.«rHRrtctofdt A voA W 9. Type species by Ts, Philippines. Quezon RrpVi,. Llavac VSll., R. original designation CmociUfmio Jichromaia Schmidl & Apostoi, 16 Jan I%5. All jnfnteniatioriall^Re^^ Insliluie. Philippines. fXcn >\non\m>') Selcmpelnht 'NcKinidi A. JmsIII^ li^dS: 22. l^tic species Sclcnnpdina AmWrfliS Sdimidt & Kroifij life (MeW j\ri

REMARKS. Sciji^Lidl (1995) removed the :md in northern Austt'alia. Australian iSfe31sB^cetf?M/a crcmipcs (Koch, 1 873 -REMARKS. None of the characters (marginal and Selenocosniio Stirling} Hogg, 1901 and dSS^nces on scopula density on tarsi) used by transferred them to the restored genus name Barrion & Litsringe9t (1995) to distinguish Pklogm Simon. 1887. The removal from TAXONOMICA ARANEAE 571

Selenocosmia was based upon differences from a No type material ofSelenocosmia stirlingi Hogg, putative paratype of Selenocosmia javanensis 1901 was examined by Schmidt but material so (Walckenaer, 1837), the type species of Seleno- labelled in the South Australian Museum was, as cosmia Ausserer, 1871. Indeed, the type species well as some other Selenocosmia species. needs to be studied, the species variability documented, the t>^pes found, and other species Schmidt (1995) lists a number of differences in may then be understood and their relationship the material mentioned. No variational study with the type species and ditTerences from it supports the species significance of those understood. None of that has been done in the differences. More importantly, Schmidt does not above three papers written or coauthored by explain how other species of Selenocosmia Schmidt. belong to a ditTerent monophyletic group from The type material of Selenocosmia javanensis those he places in Phlogius. (Walckenaer, 1837) has not been examined or Differences in characters previously used, e.g. even located. Schmidt claims to have examined a relative leg length and diameter, are not 'paratype' of Selenocosmia javanensis in the thoroughly examined, hideed, in that character Museum ofWiesbaden but Jager ( 1 998) found no alone, Selenocosmia crassipes is more similar to such material. Type material of other species of Selenocosmia javanensis than with Seleno- Walckenaer has been found in the Musee cosmia stirlingi. National d'Histoire Nalurelle. Paris but lists only with Heurtault ( 1980) BMNH Also, Schmidt (1995) lists the distribution of Walckenaer types. In any case, since Walckenaer Selenocosmia crassipes as Australia and New did not designate a holotype, paratypes do not Guinea and so perpetuates an error from Roewer exist either. Hence, Schmidt was in error and did ( 1945), repeated without critical review by Smith not see a paratype of Selenocosmia javanensis (1992; Smith, in litt.). The type locality is (Walckenaer, 1837). Rockhampton, central coaslal Queensland and

I have examined the specimen considered the the species is centred on that area (Queensland paratype ofSelenocosmiajavanens (Walckenaer, Museum Records, Raven, unpublished data). 1837). It has two labels: one is a Museum support is given in Schmidt (1995 ) for the Weisbaden label with faded ink inscription, the No restoration of Phlogius or in Sclimidt & von other is a more legible pencil label. The Wirth (1992) and Schmidt Krause (1995) for information on both is the same: & the new genera Chilocosmia and Selenopelma, Museum no. 637 respectively. 'Selenocosmia javanensis Waick. .lava Krakau G; Prof. Kuiczvnski J900' Because the somatic and sexual morphology of mygalomorphs are so conservative it is very Type material of Walckenaer should be difficult to establish sound specific and some- labelled with the original name, "Mygale times even generic boundaries. Theraphosid javanensis'. The name Selenocosmia was first systematic studies in the past 20 years, in used by Ausserer (1871). Hence, the label rcHccting this difficulty, have mostly been reflects nothing but the locality and a subsequent characterised by the descriptions of new species identification. Walckenaer (1837) gave no and genera, outside of revisions. The resuh has further data than 'Java'. Hence, the specimen was been that many new species and some genera not labelled by Walckenaer, cannot be considered have been described in isolation without sound a type of any kind and has no nomenclatural reference to other species in the genus. Raven status. (1985b) synonymised genera in which no Other material studied included an exuvium differences of generic significance existed from a zoo specimen, a specimen (former pet?) among the type species. However, the elevation identified by Weichmann (outside of a published of new genera, or resurrection of synonymised revision). genera, has occurred for a similar but reciprocal The type specimen of Phlogius crassipes reason: that a species differs (extent and status the species. Koch, 1 874 was examined as were other material unspecified) trom type Schmidt (fonner illegally exported pets) identified by (1995) and other works of Schmidt (Schmidt & Charpentier (also informally and outside of a von Wirth, 1992; Schmidt & Krause, 1995) fail revision). on such grounds. 572 Mt:M01RS OF TMK QUEENSLAND MUSEUM

NCMESUDAE A.fitswcinau Rxtinbow tV: PulleiaL-. I91R, WA A, s^cfnii^y l^ainhcw A: l*ulleine. 1'>IS. Ctu^tdmaKogg; 1901 A- Raven, 1^-)S5. NT A ;...;,';/.v.;Ra\'cn. ^">S5. NSVS'. Qld Chenkfitffiia HogEt 1901: 362. Type ssTctiK^^ ori^nal ' ^; ''> a/w Raven. imQId A. hngithcca Raven, 1985, QM DIAGNOSIS. Chenlstonia diffcTS [rofttiAmme A, macultHa (Kainbow & PulklOA. bywaleshavingamcili . jl spur and mcgaspineon tibiaI,aIongslendei ixilpal tarsus, vi pear-shaped A. f^befi^tm^ R^ybOr 19B5, Qld palpal bulb w ith tiK cnnholus \ cn shorr orabsenl. A robiSta Raii^Hnv & F^ll^ 19 1 8» SA and by both sexes ba\ ing sriuill niariiinal sternal

tepperi (Hogg. I V02), sigilki. C hcnismnii! :share:s with Wnvro and 71^1 WA.SA ^. t^inu Raven, 19S5, O'd thedot^at^ palpal taru^in males but diit^rs from ^ m^ka Raven. 1*^84. Qld iii lacking the refie^ed -mViilm atid I tnrt-f^aa Main, 19^4. S>\. WA further Irom /Umwi- in thai in males the basal ( v//A'Ar;fi

REMARKS. Raven ( i985b) maintained DISTRIBUTION Oeka StHtion, Dfear filflckall, Chenistonia in the synonyw^ of AfiaMe^ western Queensland.

1 foUowiitg Raven ( 98 1 ). I fowver, MAfe (1$86v withoul expJanaticm) has maintained their RtMARKS. Ravei> ^1985a) gaVcaftipk reasons respective validity. Phy logenetically. ih&l iht lieotype deslgnaU^ or Dtkana (ib/^rsicofor Uog^, !9fv: by MaMil,(T^S2h) was Chenistonia is here confined only to HixtAMM^ invalid. Apan from anything else, in Main maculata group or Raven ( I *>S4). (I'^^^'ib) making such a designation outside of Main (19S2a, 1 9S6) conlmiied to place Aname and before a revision, it was noi possible to asserl tepperi in Chenistonut. However, it has a long that the identity of species eould not be embolus. HencC; the inclusion of .'J. tepperi in Chenistoma makQS the i;roup eoneept polyihetic. estabUabed from Hogg's { 1 902 ) figures. Indeed, liis revision, Ravttft foiitvd The only illustration ofihe male i)fA- /eppcn']^ in M (1985a) Hogg's figures were perfectly to recognise llie Main (1964) and sinee then ihere has been no adequate species. .Mso, comparison of ihe inorpiioh)^}- of phylpgisnetic anajyiij^ of th^ sp^cj^s nominally other inctuded by Mpiii ll9i^ijithemstoniaS&3i^6sr species described by Hogg wiih his own Raven (l<)g4,J9§5a,b). figures indicaSes that his ttgurei wer^ ^4;urat^ Main ( I982t^ dsD placed* Aname afr& (Stcand, I'hc foUoWilftg species are explicitly incl^S^ 1913) into the synom niy of / ^/ivLTsicohr but \&Ch&HUian^^^4nim&^ respectively. R^ven f 1985a) found that the nvo species were Species included in CJienisionia: T^^ily distinguishable, fo accept Main's Ancmw caemktmuuntnia Ra\en, 19X^1, NSW (J982bJ neotype designation requires that Anwnr hii knusm K-iNcn. l'^84, NSW Ho^'s figures showed significant difiercnccs in i'hc'nist(>iui: nuhiiliuu Hogg, I'XII. VIT

relative scses and sbaipes iVom the original . Main Aiiuf ic fnouUtna Raven. t^84, NSM' (I982bl29) stated the [neotypc desiffnationj Gioustotua trcvallynki Hieknian, 1V2(), 1^ was 'in the interests ofnomenclatura I stabi I i (y for Species included \n Aname: a common and widespread species v\hich A. utmy\t'ra Rainbow & Pulleine, 1*^IK, W»V frequently allraeis human attention and to which

\. (m/(St]-and. 1913), SA,NT references have already been ntade in medical \ amv/ Rainbow & Pulleine. 1918. NSW

A. hanvma R:i\ l-ii. V-m. Qld, NSW v'niinL' fKMT! South Australia djftjsipt mention il .•1. I'lackihwiioris Raven. T-'S-S. Qld and ai diat time 1 can find onjy Main (1976) J, iOtvosu Raink>vv l*ulieine. I^IS, SA making commeiitB: al>ipait Wtei pjP B&kaM A. cunuinj Raven. I ^85. Uld divei'skoloK Subsequently, Har\'ey & Main (1996) found Ibat indeed Del^ Stat^n^ Queensland was the wrecst hiteirprecatidi of the type locality of DehcuurdiversicohK ThesQotyp^ djesTgnat^ by TAXONOMICA ARANEAE 573

Main (1982b) is hence here considered the Museum, Sydney, kindly loaned me the type holotype of a new species, Aname mainae. material ofArhanitis hancrofti. Dr Barbara Baehr kindly carried the putative paratype of Aname mainae sp. nov. Seleuocosmia javanensis from Hessisches Aname diversicolor. Main, 1982b: 29. Landcsmuseum Weisbaden, grateftilly loaned by Herm Fritz Geller-Grimm. MATERIAL. HOLOTYPE {= 'neotvpe'): SAM N 1980 196, J, 26km NW of El listen, SA, 20 Dec 1952, LITERATURE CITED B.Y. Main; SAM N 1980 195, 9, same data, examined. AUSSERER, A. 1871. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der DIAGNOSIS. Males differ from those ofAname Arachniden-Famiiie der Tcrritelariae Thorell diversicolor (Hogg, 1902) in having a centrally (Mygalidae Autor). Verhandlungen der Zooogische-Botanischen Gesellschati in Wien placed, not clearly distal, tibial spur and the 21: 177-224. embolic shaft being straight not bent (see BARRION, A.T. & LITSINGER, .I.A. 1995. Riceland Raven, 1985a: 396, 397). spiders of South and Southeast Asia. (CAB International, University Press: Cambridge). DISTRIBUTION. South Australia. BENOIT, RL.G 1965. Les Barychelidae-Diplothelinae DIPLURTOAE africains et malgaches (Araneae-Orthognatha). Revue Zoologique et Botanique, Africaines 72: Masteria L. Koch, 1873 26-40. BONNET, R 1958. Bibliographie Araneorum. Masieria L. Koch. 1873: 458. Type species by monotypy, Toulouse 2(4): 3027-4230. Masteria hirsuia L. Koch, 1873. CHURCHILL, TB. RAVEN, R.J. 1992. Systematics Accoia Simon, 1889: 191. Type species by subsequent & of the intertidai trapdoor spider genus Idioctis designation oi' Simon (1892), Accoia lucifuga Simon, 1889. First synonymised by Raven, 1979. (Mygalomorphae: Barychelidae) in the Western ArUrochares Rainbow, 1898: 332. Type species by Pacific with a new genus from the northeast. monotypy, Antrochares macgf-egori Rainbow, 1898. First Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 32: 9-30. synonymised by Raven, 1979. HARVEY, M.R. & MAIN, B.Y. 1996. A note on the Mlcrosteria Wundcrlich, 1988: 46. Type species by type locality of Dekana diversicolor Hogg. monotyp)'. MUrosteria sexocidata Wunderlich. 1988. Australasian Arachnology 51: 5-6. (New synonym}') HEURTAULT, J. 1980. Liste des collections Masteria sexoculata (Wunderlich), comb. nov. arachnologiques mondiales. (Centre Internationale de Documentation Mkrosteria sexoculala Wunderlich, 1988: 47; hololypc male Arachnologique: Paris). examined. HOGG, H.R. 1901. On Australian and New Zealand REMARKS. Wunderlich (1988) raised spiders of the suborder Mygalomorphae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London Microsteria on the grounds that the teeth on the 1901(2): 218-279. third claw are sessile and not tuberculate or not on 1 902. On some additions to the Australian spiders of a common process as in other other masteriine the suborder Mygalomorphae. Proceedings of genera (Masteria Koch, 1873, Striamea Raven, the Zoological Society of London 1902(2): 1981). Raven (1981) showed that in existing 121-142. masteriine, the teeth basally fuse before reaching JAEGER, P 1998. Das Typenmaterial der Spinnentiere (Arachnida: Acari, Amblypygi, Araneae, the claw. I examined the holotype of Microsteria Scorpiones, sexocidata (sent to me for identification prior to Opi Hones, Pseudoscorpiones, Uropygi) aus dem Museum Wiesbaden. Wunderlich's paper). Two teeth are present on the Jahbucher des Nassauischen vereins fur third claw. The anterior tooth is shorter and the Naturkunde 119: 81-91. division between the two teeth deep. It was not KOCH, L. 1 873. Die Arachniden Australiens, nach der possible to determine the very subtle difference natur beschrieben und abgebildet. Vol. 1: between a low anterior tooth on the claw and a 369-472. (Bauer und Raspe: Numberg). common tubercle. I concluded it was Masteria 1874. Die Arachniden Australiens, nach der natur and still do, so the genus is placed in synonymy. beschrieben und abgebildet. Vol. 1: 473-576. (Bauer und Raspe: Nurnberg). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MAFN, B.Y. 1964. Spiders of Australia. (Jacaranda Press: Brisbane). I grateful to Drs Norman I Platnick, am 1976. Spiders. (Collins' Australian Naturalist History, American Museum of Natural New Library series: Sydney). York, and Mark Harvey, Western Australian 1982a. Further studies on the systematics of Museum, Perth, for comments on the manuscript. Australian Diplurinae (Araneae: Mygalo- Dr Mike Gray and Graham Milledge, Australian morphae, Dipluridae): the taxonomic status of 574 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM

Proshermacha Simon and Chenistonia tepperi 1981. Three new mygalomorph spiders Hogg. Australian Entomological Magazine 8: (Dipluridae, Masteriinae) from Colombia. 83-88. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural 1982b. Notes on the revised position of the Black History 170: 57-63. Wishbone spider Dekona diversicolor Hogg 1984. A revision of the Aname maculata species (Mygalomorphae: Dipluridae). Journal of the group (Dipluridae, Araneae) with notes on Proceedings of the Royal Societ\' of Western biogeography. Journal of Arachnology 12: Australia 65: 25-29. 177-193. 1985. Mygalomorphae. In Walton, D.W. (ed.) 1985a. A revision of the Aname pallida species- Zoological catalogue of Australia, 3. Arachnida: group in northern Australia (Anaminae: Mygalomorphae, Araneomorphae in part, Nemesiidae: Araneae), Australian Journal of Pseudoscorpionida. Amblypygi, and Palpigradi. Zoology 33: 377-409. (Australian Government Publishing Service: 1985b. The spider infraorder Mygalomorphae Canberra). (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bulletin of 1986. Further studies on the systematics of the American Museum ofNatural History 182: 1-180. Australian Diplurinae ( Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Dipluridae): a new genus from 1988. A revision of the mygalomorph spider genus south-western Australia. Records of the Western Idioctis (Araneae, Barychelidae). American Australian Museum 12: 395-402. Museum Novitates 2929: 1-14. 1990. revision of the Australian spider genus 1997. Tropical rainforest mygalomorph spiders in A the Australian desert: the irony of an adaptive Trittame Koch (Mygalomorphae: Barychelidae) legacv. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria and a new related genus. Invertebrate Taxonomy 4:21-51. 56(2): 339-347.

1 994. Mygalomorph spiders of the Barychelidae in PICKARD-CAMBRIDGE, O. 1890. On some new Australia and the western Pacific. species and two new genera of Araneida. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 35(2): 291-706. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1890: 620-629. ROEWER, C.R 1942. Kataloii der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940. (Paul Budy Bd.: Bremen) 1: i-viii + PLATNICK, N.l. 1989. Advances in Spider Taxonomy 1-1040. 1981-1987: A supplement to Brignoli's 'A SCHMIDT, G 1995. Gehoren ' Selenocosmia' crassipes catalogue of the Araneae described between 1 940 (L. Koch, 1873) und 'Selenocos/nia' Stirling! and 1981'. (Manchester University Press: 1901 (Araneida: Manchester). Hogg, Theraphosidae: Selenocosmiinae) wirklich zu Se/enocosmia PLATNICK, N.L 1993. Advances in spider taxonomy Ausserer, 1871? Arachnologsiche Magazin 3(11): 1988-1991. With synonymy ies and transfers 1-12. 1940-1980. (New York Entomological Society & SCHMIDT, G.E.W. & KRAUSE, R.H. 1995. Fine neue American Museum of Natural History: New Art der Theraphosidae aus Vietnam Selenopelma York). kovariki gen. et sp.n. (Araneida: Theraphosidae: 1998. Advances in spider taxonomy 1992-1995: Selenocosmiinae). Arlhropoda 3(2): 21-24. with redescriptions 1940-1980.' (New York SCHMIDT, G.E.W. & VON WIRTH, V. 1992. Entomological Society & American Museum of Beschriebung des Weibchens von Chilocosmia Natural History: New York). dichromata gen.n. sp.n. und des Mannchens von POCOCK, R.I. 1897. Spinnen (Araneae). In Chilocosmia arndsti (Schmidt & von Wirth, Kiikenthal, Willy, Frgebnisse einer zoologische 1 99 1) (Araneida: Theraphosidae: Seleno- Forschungsreise in dem Molukken und Borneo. cosmiinae). Arachnologsiche Anzeiger 3(11): Abhandlungen Senkenbergischen 9-16. Naturforschung Gesellschaft 23: 591-629. S1IS40N, E. 1 887. [Observations sur divers arachnides: 1903a. Descriptions of four new Arachnida of the synonymies et descriptions.] Annales de la Solifrigae order Pcdipalpi, and Araneae. Annals Societe Entomologique de France, 6: 195. and Magazine ofNatural History 7( 1 ): 220-226. 1 1889. Voyage de M.E. Simon au Venezuela R AINB(3W, W.J. 1 898. Contribution to a knowledge of (decembre 1887-avrii 1888). 4^ memoire. the arachnidan fauna of British New Guinea. Arachnides. Annales de la Societe Ento- Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South mologique de France, ser. 6, vol. 9: 169-220. Wales 23: 328-356. 1 892. Histoire naturelle des araignees. Tome 1 (1); RAIMBOW, W.J., & PULLEINE, R.H. 1918. Aus- 1-256. (Roret: Paris). tralian trap-door spiders. Records of the 1903. Histoire naturelle des araignees. Tome 2(4) Australian Museum 12: 81-169. Supplement General: 875-1080. (Roret: Paris). RAVEN, R.J. 1979. Systematics of the mygalomorph 1902. Descriptions d'arachnides nouveaux de la genus Masteria (Masteriinae: Dipluridae: famille des Aviculariides faisant partie des Arachnida). Australian Journal of Zoology^ 27: collections du museum. Bulletin du Museum 623-636. Histoire Naturelle, Paris 8: 595-599. TAXONOMICA ARANEAE 575

SOUTHCOTT, R.V. 1976. Arachnidism and allied Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria, syndromes in the Australian region. Records of Genova 30: 269-383. the Adelaide Children's Hospital 1(1): 97-186. 1978. Australian harmful and their allies. 1897. Viaggio del Leonardo Fea in Birmania e Published by the author. regioni vicine. LXXIII. Secondo saggio sui STRAND, E. 1907. Vorlaufige diagnoses afrikanischer Ragni birmani. I. Parallelodontes Tubitelariae. und sudamerikanischer Spinnen. Zoologische Anzeiger31: 525-558. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale 1913. Uber einige australische Spinnen des Giacomo Doria, Genova 37: 161-267. Senckenbergischen Museum. Zoologischer WALCKENAER, C.A. 1837. Histoire naturelle des Jahrbucher35: 599-624. Insectes. Apteres. Vol.1. Paris, 1837, pp. 1-682. THORELL, T. 1881. Studi sui Ragni Malesi e Papuani III. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale WUNDERLICH, J. 1988. Die Fossilen Spinnen im Giacomo Doria, Genova 17: vii-xxvii, 1-720. Dominikanischen Bernstein. Beitrage zur 1890. Aracnidi di Pinang raccoltl nel 1889 dai Araneologie, 2. (The author: Straubenhardt, West signori L. Loria e L. Fea. Annali del Museo Germany).