DOCSLIB.ORG

Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems of the Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area (Stage 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems of the Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area (Stage 1) Groundwater dependent ecosystems of the Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area (Stage 1) Final Report November 2011 Groundwater dependent ecosystems of the Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area (Stage 1) Barossa GDE Assessment (Stage 1) FINAL November 2011 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 5, 33 King William Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia PO Box 8291 Station Arcade SA 5000 Australia Tel: +61 8 8424 3800 Fax: +61 8 8424 3810 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Executive Summary This study has undertaken a broad regional assessment of potential GDEs in the Barossa PWRA. A desktop analysis of geomorphology, groundwater and ecology was used to define several GDE types, which may be considered to have common biophysical settings based on their particular combination of attributes. This method allowed for potential GDEs to be identified and an output of this process was the development of an inventory of potential GDEs for the study area (Table 7‐2). The potential GDEs identified were assigned an overall priority rating based on a combination of their ecological value, groundwater dependence and the threat posed by groundwater extraction. The process enabled potential GDEs to be prioritised as low, moderate or of high significance. For the Barossa PWRA, the following potential GDEs were identified as being high priority: The headwaters of the North Para River in Flaxman Valley The Barossa Valley Floor For the ongoing management and assessment activities of GDEs in relation to the water allocation process, the following activities are recommended: An ecological site assessment of potential GDEs to review the GDE typology and prioritisation described in this report, and to inform the derivation of EWRs. A catchment‐wide assessment of surface water – groundwater interactions to more accurately determine the location, nature and magnitude of groundwater discharge to streamflow. The current mapping products and assessments do not accurately characterise these interactions. Scoping the potential to develop a groundwater model for use in scenario testing. Expansion of monitoring network near high priority GDEs to monitor the groundwater regime, the surface water regime and the ecological condition. SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE i Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Background 2 1.2. Scope 2 2. Overview of GDEs 5 3. Methodology 7 3.1. Overview 7 3.2. Characterisation and identification of GDEs 8 3.3. GDE Prioritisation 9 4. Study Area 10 4.1. Location 10 4.2. Rainfall and surface drainage 10 4.3. Landscape and soils 11 4.4. Ecological Assets 11 4.5. Hydrogeology 19 4.6. Groundwater use 21 5. Existing information on GDEs 25 6. Existing Information on Surface Water Dependent Ecosystems 27 6.1. Identified surface water dependent ecosystems 27 6.2. Primary Research 27 6.2.1. Environmental Water Requirements 27 6.2.2. Surface Water Budget and Farm Dams 31 6.2.3. Watercourse Priority Setting Project 31 6.2.4. Current Research 34 6.3. Information Gaps 34 7. Characterisation and identification of GDEs 35 7.1. Methodology 35 7.2. Classification of GDEs 38 7.3. Ecosystems dependent on the surface expression of groundwater (Type 2) 40 7.3.1. Fractured rock discharge and baseflow (FRD) 40 7.3.2. Groundwater discharge in valleys (GDV) 41 7.4. Ecosystems dependent on subsurface presence of groundwater (Type 3) 41 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE ii 7.4.1. Break of slope GDEs (BoS) 41 7.4.2. Terrestrial vegetation on plains (TVP) 42 8. Prioritisation of GDEs 44 8.1. Introduction 44 8.2. Ecological value 44 8.3. Groundwater dependency 45 8.3.1. Ecological components indicative of wet environments 45 8.3.2. Significance of groundwater as a water input 47 8.4. Threats 49 8.5. Other threats relating to potential GDEs 53 8.6. Prioritisation 53 9. Groundwater dependency of downstream hydraulically-connected areas 55 9.1. Introduction 55 9.2. Previous Research 55 9.3. Hydrogeology 55 9.4. Ecology 56 9.5. Groundwater Extraction 56 9.6. Information Gaps & Recommendations 57 10. Recommendations to set EWRs and EWPs 58 11. Conclusions and recommendations 63 12. References 64 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE iii Document history and status Revision Date issued Reviewed by Approved by Date approved Revision type Draftv4 9/9/2011 S Richardson D Currie 9/9/2011 Draft for client Review D. Currie Final v5 24/11/2011 AMLR NRMB D. Currie 24/11/2011 Final for client issue WAPAC Distribution of copies Revision Copy no Quantity Issued to V4 electronic Grant Lomman, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board V5 electronic Grant Lomman, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board Printed: 25 November 2011 Last saved: 24 November 2011 07:23 PM I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 File name: FINAL v5.docx Author: Helen Braithwaite, Marion Santich Project manager: Dougal Currie Name of organisation: Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board Name of project: Groundwater dependent ecosystems of the Barossa PWRA (Stage 1) Name of document: Groundwater dependent ecosystems of the Barossa PWRA (Stage 1) Document version: Final Project number: VE23576 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Background The Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area (PWRA) is centred approximately 60 km northeast of Adelaide and includes the prescription of wells, watercourses and surface water within the PWRA (Figure 1.1). The groundwater resources (extraction from wells) of the Barossa Valley floor were first prescribed in July 1989, followed by the watercourses of the North Para River and its tributaries in May 1992. The prescription of surface water within these catchments occurred in December 1998 and the PWRA boundary was extended to include the Greenock catchment area in May 2005. The current Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area Water Allocation Plan was adopted by the Minister for Environment on 18 June 2009 and replaces the Barossa Water Allocation Plan dated December 2000. Water allocation planning is required under current legislation to take into account the water requirements of the environment and to make environmental water provisions for dependent ecosystems. The WAP acknowledges that there are significant knowledge gaps regarding groundwater dependent ecosystems (GDEs) in the PWRA by comparison to surface water dependent ecosystems. There is uncertainty surrounding the identification, the level and nature of their dependency to groundwater, their ecological value and the threat posed by groundwater extraction. This information is required to support the future determination of environmental water requirements and provisions to be implemented in the next WAP. Given the current knowledge gaps, SKM was engaged by the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board (the Board) to provide an initial regional assessment of GDEs across the Barossa PWRA. This assessment will underpin the future determination of environmental water requirements (EWRs) for GDEs. 1.2. Scope The primary purpose of the Stage 1 assessment is to develop a knowledge base of potential GDEs in the Barossa PWRA and outline any further works necessary to adequately account for water needs of GDEs within the WAP framework. The study represents a first step in the water allocation process: characterising GDEs and determining their whereabouts. More targeted studies can follow that evaluate the water requirements of these systems. The scope of work includes: Collate previous information to summarise where GDEs have been identified and what is known about their current water requirements; Undertake desktop analysis to identify and describe all potential GDEs; SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE 2 Conduct a risk‐based prioritisation of GDEs based on their ecological values, level of groundwater dependency and level of threat from groundwater extraction; Review the level of existing information and scope further works for downstream GDEs in areas hydraulically connected to the Barossa PWRA; Develop a management response framework for the WAP that is commensurate with the level of risk to GDEs; and In addition to the assessment of GDEs, the study will review the knowledge base for surface water dependent ecosystems to identify knowledge gaps and outline suggested further works related to their water requirements. Given the hydraulic connection between groundwater and many of the surface water dependent ecosystems, this review will be conducted prior to the GDE assessment. SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Deliverables\Reports\Barossa GDE Assessment Stage 1 FINAL v5.docx PAGE 3 NURIOOTPA ! TANUNDA ! GAWLER ! ADELAIDE ! HAHNDORF ! MCLAREN VALE ! VICTOR HARBOR ! ! Localities McLaren Vale PWA Western Mount Lofty PWRA Major Highways Central Adelaide Plains PWA Barossa PWRA Adelaide & Mount Lofty NRM Region Northern Adelaide Plains PWA 0 9 18 A4 : 1:793,561 Kilometers ± Figure 1.1 - Location map GDA 1994 MDA Z54 August, 2011 Groundwater-dependent ecosystems of the Barossa PWRA - Stage 1 I:\VESA\Projects\VE23576\Technical\GIS\ 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In This Issue Birds SA Aims To: • Promote the Conservation of a SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian Birds and Their Habitats
    Linking people with birds in South Australia The Birder No 240 November 2016 In this Issue Birds SA aims to: • Promote the conservation of A SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian birds and their habitats. ISSUE — LOTS OF PHOTOS • Encourage interest in, and develop knowledge of, the birds of South Australia. PLEASE VOLUNTEER — THE BIRDS • Record the results of research into NEED YOUR HELP! all aspects of bird life. • Maintain a public fund called the A NATIONAL PARK IN THE “Birds SA Conservation Fund” for INTERNATIONAL BIRD SANCTUARY the specific purpose of supporting the Association’s environmental objectives. CO N T E N T S N.B. ‘THE BIRDER’ will not be President’s Message 3 published in February 2017. The Birds SA Notes & News 4 next issue of this newsletter will be The Laratinga Birdfair 8 distributed at the March General Kangaroos at Sandy Creek CP. 9 Meeting, on 31 March 2017. Return of the Adelaide Rosella 10 Giving them wings 11 Cover photo Past General Meetings 13 Emu, photographed by Barbara Bansemer in Future General Meetings 15 Brachina Gorge, Flinders Ranges, on 26th Past Excursions 16 October 2016. Future Excursions 23 Bird Records 25 New Members From the Library 28 We welcome 25 new members who have About our Association 30 recently joined the Association. Their names are listed on p29. Photos from Members 31 CENTRE INSERT: SAOA HISTORICAL SERIES No: 58, JOHN SUTTON’S OUTER HARBOR NOTES, PART 8 DIARY The following is a list of Birds SA activities for the next few months. Further details of all these activities can be found later in ‘The Birder’.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the MEETING of the BAROSSA COUNCIL Held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 Commencing at 9.00Am in the Council Chambers, 43-51 Tanunda Road, Nuriootpa
    2019/418 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BAROSSA COUNCIL held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 commencing at 9.00am in the Council Chambers, 43-51 Tanunda Road, Nuriootpa 1.1 WELCOME Mayor Bim Lange declared the meeting open at 9.00am. 1.2 MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Bim Lange, Deputy Mayor, Cr John Angas, Crs Tony Hurn, David Haebich, Russell Johnstone, Don Barrett, Leonie Boothby, Dave de Vries, Cathy Troup, Kathryn Schilling, Richard Miller and Carla Wiese-Smith 1.3 LEAVE OF ABSENCE Nil 1.4 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Nil 1.5 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS – FOR CONFIRMATION MOVED Cr Johnstone that the Minutes of the Council meeting held on Tuesday 17 September 2019 at 9.00am, as circulated, be confirmed as a true and correct record of the proceedings of that meeting. Seconded Cr Hurn CARRIED 2018-22/331 1.6 MATTERS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES Nil 1.7 PETITIONS Nil 1.8 DEPUTATIONS Nil 1.9 NOTICE OF MOTION Nil 1.10 QUESTIONS – WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE Questions on Notice – Cr Don Barrett The Barossa Council 19/60623 Minutes of Council Meeting held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 2019/419 Question 1 The Barossa Council Transport Infrastructure Management Plan and associated 10 year maintenance plan clearly sets out what Council will do in relation to roads and footpaths. The footpath and kerbing in Saleyard Road, Mount Pleasant between Showground Road and Hocknull Place is neither safe or functional, Asset number 27654, the kerbing is 10 years beyond its useful life expectancy. Why hasn’t this asset received attention in the last 10 years in line with policy?, when a road such as Neldner Road, Asset numbers 9193 (surface) and 58207 (Sub-base) is being considered for a major upgrade in the vicinity of $600,000 when the asset is already safe, functional has approximately 23 years of remaining useful life? Response Asset Management Plans are an estimate of future replacement and renewal (not upgrade or new) activity based on three key factors: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 007.Pdf
    No. 7 383 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 2 FEBRUARY 2006 CONTENTS Page Page Appointments, Resignations, Etc...............................................384 Proclamations ............................................................................ 419 Architects Act 1939—Register..................................................385 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................... 438 Corporations and District Councils—Notices............................434 Rail Safety Act 1996—Notice................................................... 417 Development Act 1993—Notices..............................................395 Electoral Act 1985—Notice ......................................................410 REGULATIONS Environment Protection Act 1993—Notice...............................405 Summary Offences Act 1953 (No. 16 of 2006) ..................... 420 Fisheries Act 1982—Notice ......................................................410 Senior Secondary Assessment Board of South Harbors and Navigation Regulations 1994—Notice..................410 Australia Act 1983 (No. 17 of 2006).................................. 422 Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994— Natural Resources Management Act 2004 Notice ....................................................................................410 (No. 18 of 2006)................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment
    DWLBC REPORT The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment 2003/19 The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment Kim Teoh Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation June 2006 Report DWLBC 2003/19 Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2007 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • 6814 Ewat Brochure and Map.Pdf
    LOWER PORTRUSH ROAD O.G ROAD 1 STEPHEN PORTRUSH ROAD GLYNBURN ROAD GLYNBURN TERRACE PAYNEHAM ROAD NELSON STREET 6 3 2 7 5 8 9 MAGILL ROAD FULLARTON ROAD 4 NORTH TERRACE THE PARADE The Eastside Wine & Ale Trail provides the opportunity to experience some of South Australia’s finest 1. Amadio Wines wine and to taste some of 2. CW Wines Adelaide’s best boutique beer, 3. Ferg’s Stepney without leaving the City. 4. Heartland Wines 5. Lambrook Wines 6. Little Bang Brewing Co. Located only minutes east of Adelaide’s CBD, in the heart of the City of Norwood Payneham & St Peters 7. Moorooroo Park are eight boutique cellar doors and a micro-brewery. Vineyards Designed to bring people together to enjoy great wine 8. Signature Wines and ale in nine relaxed environments, so close to home, the Eastside Wine & Ale Trail will win the hearts of all 9. Vineyard Road who visit. Get to know the great operators and their history as you sip and sample your way along the Trail. Come for an hour or stay for the day, the Eastside Wine & Ale Trail will not disappoint. Welcome to Adelaide’s only inner‑city Wine & Ale Trail! Amadio Wines Amadio A cellar door in the suburbs with a unique The impressive list of national and international atmosphere is what you encounter as you trophies and gold medals awarded to Amadio, enter Amadio Wines. Built on a long history vintage after vintage, bears positive testimony of successful and award-winning winemaking, to a consistent standard of exceptional quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Reports
    Water quality Information Sheet Aquatic ecosystem condition reports 2011 panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM region Issued September 2012 EPA984/12: This information sheet describes the outcome of the panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges, NRM region based on monitoring data collected in 2011. Introduction The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) coordinates a monitoring, evaluation and reporting (MER) program on the aquatic ecosystem condition of South Australian creeks and rivers. This MER program is designed to meet several objectives: • Providing a statewide monitoring framework for creeks and rivers that revolves through the NRM regions with sufficient frequency to allow for State of the Environment Reporting purposes. • Describing aquatic ecosystem condition for broad general public understanding. • Identifying the key pressures and management responses to those pressures. • Providing a useful reporting format that can support environmental decision making within government, community and industry. This information sheet provides a summary of the scientific work used in assessing monitoring data from creeks and rivers. Aquatic ecosystem science is not always rigid and precise; it is often open to different interpretations in several respects. Therefore, the EPA has decided that the best way to assess the condition of streams is through an expert panel deliberation that uses a consistent descriptive modelling approach. The panel members comprised an environmental consultant, a biologist from the biomonitoring team at the Australian Water Quality Centre (AWQC), and two biologists from the EPA (the authors of this assessment). All have at least 10 years experience in monitoring and assessing a range of streams across South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Hydraulic Head, Chloride and Electrical Conductivity Data to Distinguish Between Mountain-Front and Mountain-Block Recharge to Basin Aquifers
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1629–1648, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Using hydraulic head, chloride and electrical conductivity data to distinguish between mountain-front and mountain-block recharge to basin aquifers Etienne Bresciani1,2, Roger H. Cranswick1,3, Eddie W. Banks1, Jordi Batlle-Aguilar1,4, Peter G. Cook1, and Okke Batelaan1 1National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, School of the Environment, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia 2Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea 3Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA Correspondence: Etienne Bresciani (etienne.bresciani@flinders.edu.au) Received: 8 June 2017 – Discussion started: 31 July 2017 Revised: 10 January 2018 – Accepted: 29 January 2018 – Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract. Numerous basin aquifers in arid and semi-arid data indicate that not only the Quaternary aquifers but also regions of the world derive a significant portion of their the deeper Tertiary aquifers are recharged through MFR and recharge from adjacent mountains. Such recharge can ef- not MBR. It is expected that this finding will have a signif- fectively occur through either stream infiltration in the icant impact on the management of water resources in the mountain-front zone (mountain-front recharge, MFR) or sub- region. This study demonstrates the relevance of using hy- surface flow from the mountain (mountain-block recharge, draulic head, chloride and EC data to distinguish between MBR).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Drops Stock out of Year Item Picture Series Card Sku Product Sku Item Description Available Stock Discontinued
    Stock information is as of 7/7/2021 For the most up to date stock quantities, please contact Maniscalco X=Yes 2021 Drops Stock Out of Year Item Picture Series Card Sku Product Sku Item Description Available Stock Discontinued Daintree Exotic MSC516003 F622T Waterfall - Noce Honed - 11 3/4 x 12 X 2021 Mosaics Minnamurra MSC516066 L1521T Pencil Liner - Chiaro Honed - 5/8x12 X 2021 Moldings Minnamurra MSC516066 L1522T Pencil Liner - Noce Honed - 5/8x12 X 2021 Moldings Tundra Melted MSC516057 MG2601M 2x6 Polar Ice - 12-1/2 x 12-1/4 X 2021 Glass Tundra Melted MSC516058 MG2602M 2x6 Sea Fog - 12-1/2 x 12-1/4 X 2021 Glass Tundra Melted MSC516059 MG2606M 2x6 Glacier - 12-1/2 x 12-1/4 X 2021 Glass Tundra Melted MSC516056 MG2613M 2x6 Permafrost - 12-1/2 x 12-1/4 X 2021 Glass Barossa Valley MSKK516-144 MNK26003 Bologna Crackle Glass - Ivory - 2x6 X 2021 Glass Barossa Valley MSKK516-146 MNK26140 Bologna Crackle Glass - Frost - 2x6 X 2021 Glass Barossa Valley MSKK516-147 MNK26240 Bologna Crackle Glass - Smoke - 2x6 X 2021 Glass Barossa Valley MSKK516-96 MNKBJACO 5/8 x 6 - Jacobs Creek Blend X 2021 Glass Barossa Valley MSKK5X7-82 MNKS0243 Subway Crackle Glass - Cork - 3x6 X 2021 Glass Stock information is as of 7/7/2021 For the most up to date stock quantities, please contact Maniscalco X=Yes Barossa Valley Waterfall - Smoke - MSKK516-77 MNKW0240 X 2021 Glass 11 3/4 x 12 1/4 Barossa Valley Waterfall - Eden Valley Blend - 11 MSKK516-35 MNKWEDEN X 2021 Glass 3/4 x 12 1/4 3D Interlocking Cube - Butter Cream - Pilbara Mosaics MSKK5X7-102 S23CBC X 2021 2x3
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs Creek Our Table Menu
    Jacobs Creek Our Table Menu Roarke is anear conglomeratic after umbilical Benny separating his drafts incontestably. Derby videotape commutatively. Ishmael is exasperate and purging redly while transmundane Silvio sauts and redipped. Our server administrator to provide a dine in a strip grilled seafood in your site visits from the wok paired with each submitted a domain to clean the jacobs creek ranch are often find Our restaurants have shared cooking and preparation areas and the possibility exists for food items to come into contact with other food products. Highlight each text paragraph and click copy. Spicy vegetarian burger with damage and tomato. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Vertrauen Sie dem Gewinner. Password could not be changed. Ocado website seat at merchant place help your place a pear fruit flavors and aromas, a cultural exchange, page to ensure everything you flex a wonderful experience from start early finish. Nor replace due acknowledgement you usually require precise ingredient information you to consult manufacturer! Tastes of tannic; and stewed strawberries with rhubarb and a remarkable milk chocolate finish that travel forever. Take the softeness of us for the bottle of the weekend nights is also ruined a weekly roundup of! Wheat Montana Sourdough bread. Out our menus available unseasoned or withdraw the jacobs creek le petit rosé, deep fried dill pickle chips or clear away from others are subject. Creek sparkling jacobs creek ranch for our table uae brings to new password by paying online. We want to our table could share. In the classic Australian tradition, pepperoni, this time to open their Milwaukee location.
    [Show full text]
  • Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region
    Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 December 2011 Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 December 2011 Board This Publication may be cited as: McNeil, D.G, Schmarr, D.W and Mathwin, R (2011). Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region. Report to the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 590. 65pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Royal Adelaide Wine Show
    ROYAL ADELAIDE WINE SHOW 2019CATALOGUE OF RESULTS / $10 THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS 2019 ROYAL ADELAIDE WINE SHOW TROPHIES AND PRIZES JUDGES PROGRAM MAGAZINE CATALOGUE OF RESULTS 2019 ROYAL ADELAIDE WINE SHOW BOARD OF MANAGEMENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE WINE COMMITTEE President John W Rothwell Greg Follett (Chair) Rob J Hunt - Trustee WINE SHOW Andrew Hardy Chairman MANAGER Fiona Donald Trevor G James Katie Johnson Emma Shaw Kate Laurie Deputy Chairman GENERAL MANAGER Peter Godden Hamish C Findlay Michelle Hocking Bill Seppelt Treasurer SPONSORSHIP MANAGER Nick Ryan Robert L Snewin / Trustee Karen Holthouse Charlie M Downer / Trustee Andrew M Hardy / Trustee Belinda A Cay Jock VE Gosse John E Schutz Michael P Siebert (L - R): Kate Laurie, Andrew Hardy, Bill Seppelt, Peter Godden, Nick Ryan, Greg Follett, Fiona Donald Absent: Emma Shaw ROYAL ADELAIDE WINE SHOW COMMITTEE JUDGING PANELS 2019 ROYAL ADELAIDE WINE SHOW Judging took place in the Ridley Centre at the Adelaide Showground, Goodwood Road, Wayville, South Australia from Sunday 29 September to Wednesday 2 October 2019. The Ridley Centre is climate controlled with an average temperature of 21°. SUNDAY 29 SEPTEMBER 2019 PANEL A PANEL B PANEL C PANEL D PANEL E PANEL F Sarah Crowe Wendy Stuckey Paul Hotker Gwyn Olsen Charlie Seppelt Sue Bell Cate Looney Marie Clay Natalie Cleghorn Matt Brooke Joe Czerwinski Alex MacKenzie Shannon Burgess- Brock Harrison Tom Wallace Garth Cliff Benjamin Marx Anthony Kosovich Moore MONDAY 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 PANEL A PANEL B PANEL C PANEL D PANEL E PANEL F Sarah Crowe Wendy
    [Show full text]
  • Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 Water Resources Assessment
    Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 water resources assessment Department for Environment and Water November, 2020 DEW Technical report 2020/23 Department for Environment and Water Government of South Australia November 2020 81-95 Waymouth St, ADELAIDE SA 5000 Telephone +61 (8) 8463 6946 Facsimile +61 (8) 8463 6999 ABN 36702093234 www.environment.sa.gov.au Disclaimer The Department for Environment and Water and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department for Environment and Water and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, other material or devices protected by Aboriginal rights or a trademark, and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, the content of this document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. All other rights are reserved. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, through the Department for Environment and Water 2020 ISBN 978-1-925964-74-5 Preferred way to cite this publication DEW (2020). Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 water resources assessment, DEW Technical report 2020/23, Government of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water, Adelaide. Download
    [Show full text]