Decree No. 64 of 1995 on the Ratification of the Arab Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 64 / 1995

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decree No. 64 of 1995 on the Ratification of the Arab Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 64 / 1995 Decree No. 64 of 1995 On the Ratification of the Arab Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 64 / 1995 We, Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, Emir of the State of Qatar; Having perused the Amended Provisional Constitution, in particular Articles 23, 24 and 34 thereof; Council of Ministers Resolution resolved at the ninth regular meeting of 1995, held on 15/03/1995, approving the Arab Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances; The instrument of ratification issued on twenty-sixth day of the month of Dhu AlQadah 1415, corresponding to twenty-sixth April 1995; The proposal of the Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister of Interior; and The draft Decree submitted by the Council of Ministers; Hereby promulgate the following Decree: Article 1 The Arab Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances has been ratified, a copy of which is annexed to this Decree, and shall have the full force of the law in accordance with Article 24 of the Amended Provisional Constitution. Article 2 All relevant authorities, each in their respective field of competence, shall enforce this Decree, which shall come into force on the date of its issuance and shall be published in the Official Gazette. Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, Emir of the State of Qatar Issued from the Amiri Diwan on: 11/04/1416, Corresponding to 06/09/1995 Official Gazette :Issue: 18Publication Date: 01/01/1995 Arab Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances The Arab Parties to this Convention, Deeply concerned by the magnitude of and rising trend in the illicit production of, demand for and traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, at the international level, which pose a serious threat to the health and welfare of human beings and adversely affect the social and cultural values and the economic and political foundations of society; Recognising the links between illicit traffic and other related organised criminal activities which undermine the legitimate economies and threaten the stability, security and sovereignty of States which requires urgent and immediate attention and priority of all states, and place them on top of their concerns and their comprehensive development plans; Aware that illicit traffic generates large financial profits and wealth enabling transnational criminal organisations to penetrate, contaminate and corrupt the structures of government, legitimate commercial and financial business, and society at all its levels, which requires them to determine by all means to deprive persons engaged in illicit traffic of illicit drugs and psychotropic substances of the proceeds of their criminal activities and thereby eliminate their main incentive that drives them to this illicit activity, and thus paralysing the activities of smuggling gangs and frustration. Desiring to eliminate the root causes of the problem of abuse of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including the illicit demand for such drugs and substances and the enormous profits derived from illicit traffic; Considering that measures are necessary to monitor certain substances, including precursors, chemicals and solvents, which are used in the manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the ready availability of which has led to an increase in the clandestine manufacture of such drugs and substances; Recognising the need to strengthen the Arab security cooperation, in order to address more effectively, to various aspects of the problem of illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, with its Arab, regional and international aspects; Considering the obligation to take the member states the necessary measures, in accordance with the regulations and domestic legislation and guided by the provisions of the Islamic Sharia, to fulfil the obligations imposed by international conventions on drugs, and in a manner consistent with the principles of equality in sovereign and regional integrity and non-interference in the internal affairs of member states. Recognizing that eradication of illicit traffic of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is a collective responsibility of all States and that, to that end, co-ordinated action within the framework of Arab, regional and international co-operation is necessary, through reinforce and supplement the measures provided in the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, that Convention as amended by the 1972 Protocol Amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988, the Riyadh Arab Agreement for Judicial Cooperation, and the Arab bilateral agreements and multilateral, in order to counter the magnitude and extent of illicit traffic and its grave consequences; Reaffirming the need for the Arab presence effective in conferences, meetings and regional and international meetings specialist on the subject of narcotic drugs, as well as the need to benefit from the experience, capabilities and programmes of agencies and international authorities, and to encourage to conclude bilateral agreements, organise regular meetings for the competent agencies of the border posts between the Arab states and neighbouring foreign states to exchange information and develop joint plans, ensure control of the smugglers, monitor their movements, and paralyse their activities among the common border; Recognizing the importance of strengthening and enhancing effective legal means for Arab, bilateral and multilateral, regional and international co-operation in criminal matters for suppressing the international criminal activities of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; Consistent with the Arab strategy to combat the illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, adopted by the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior at the fifth session in Tunisia, in its resolution No. 72 issued on 02/12/1986, the Unified Arab Law Model for Drug, adopted by the Council at the fourth session in Casablanca, in its resolution No. 56 issued on 05/02/1986 and the Riyadh Arab Agreement for Judicial Cooperation, adopted by the Council of Arab Ministers of Justice on 06/04/1983; In implementation of the provisions of Article 4 of the Statute of the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior, which has been ratified by the Council of the Arab League Resolution No. 4218 issued on 23/09/1982; Desiring to conclude a comprehensive, effective and operative Arab convention that is directed specifically against illicit traffic of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and that considers the various aspects of the problem as a whole, in particular those aspects not envisaged in the existing treaties in the field of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; Hereby agree as follows: Definitions Article 1 Except where otherwise expressly indicated or where the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall apply throughout this Convention: 1- “Council” means the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior. 2- “Secretariat-General” means the Secretariat General of the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior. 3- “Secretary-General” means the Secretary General of the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior. 4- “Centre” means Arab Security Studies and Training Centre. 5- “Commercial carrier” means any person or any public, private or other entity engaged in transporting persons, goods or mails for remuneration, hire or any other benefit. 6- “Unified Law” means the Unified Arab Law Model for Drug, adopted by the Council of Arab Ministers of Interior in its Resolution No. 56 on 05/02/1986. 7- “Unified Table” means the Unified Arab Table for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, derived from United Nations conventions and the amendments thereto. 8- “Confiscation” means the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. 9- “Controlled delivery” means the technique of allowing illicit consignments of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, or substances listed in the Unified Table to pass out of, through or into the territory of one or more countries, with the knowledge and under the supervision of their competent authorities, with a view to identifying persons involved in the commission of offences established in accordance with article 2, paragraph 1. 10- “1961 Convention as amended” means the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol. 11- “1971 Convention” means the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971. 12- “1988 Convention” means the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988. 13- “Riyadh Convention on Judicial Cooperation” means Riyadh Arab Agreement for Judicial Cooperation, approved by the Council of Arab Ministers of Justice on 06/04/1983. 14- “Freezing” or “seizure” means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property on the basis of an order issued by a court or a competent authority. 15- “Illicit traffic” means the offences set forth in Article 2, paragraphs 1 and 2, of this Convention. 16- “Narcotic drug” means any of the substances, natural or synthetic, in Part 1 of the Unified Table. 17- “Proceeds” means any property derived from or obtained, directly or indirectly, through the commission
Recommended publications
  • Participant Handbook
    LOWNDES COUNTY DUI COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK STATE COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY 327 NORTH ASHLEY STREET VALDOSTA, GA 31601 PHONE: 229-671-2895 FAX: 229-671-3441 Lowndes County DUI Court Team: Ellen S. Golden Judge, State Court Cynthia Welch Assistant Solicitor-General Gee Edwards Defense Attorney Stacey Bass Court Coordinator Kayla Porter Probation Officer Laci Rankhorn Treatment Provider Jason Reeves Surveillance Officer Revised 3/1/19 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION TO THE LOWNDES COUNTY STATE COURT DUI COURT.......................... 4 TREATMENT OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................... 6 I. PHASES OF THE DUI COURT PROGRAM........................................................................................7 Phase 1 – (approximately 17 weeks)....................................................................................................7 Phase 2 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 8 Phase 3 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 9 Phase 4 Aftercare- (approximately 3 months)....................................................................................9 Phase Progression.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine
    Published 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.w Birth Defects Research (Part B) 74:471–584 (2005) NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Mari Golub,1 Lucio Costa,2 Kevin Crofton,3 Deborah Frank,4 Peter Fried,5 Beth Gladen6 Rogene Henderson,7 Erica Liebelt,8 Shari Lusskin,9 Sue Marty,10 Andrew Rowland11 John Scialli12 and Mary Vore13 1California Environment Protection Agency, Sacramento, California 2University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 4Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 5Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario 6National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 7Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 8University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama 9New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 11University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 12Phoenix, Arizona 13University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky PREFACE studies indexed before December 31, 2004. References were also identified from databases such as REPRO- The National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the TOXs, HSDB, IRIS, and DART and from report National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences bibliographies. (NIEHS) established the NTP Center for the Evaluation This evaluation resulted from the efforts of a 13- of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) in June 1998. member panel of government and non-government The purpose of the Center is to provide timely, unbiased, scientists that culminated in a public expert panel scientifically sound evaluations of human and experi- meeting held January 10–12, 2005. This report is a mental evidence for adverse effects on reproduction and product of the Expert Panel and is intended to (1) development caused by agents to which humans may be interpret the strength of scientific evidence that exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Ensuring Patient Access To, and Safe Management Of, Controlled Medicines Notice
    African Palliative Care Association Guidelines for Ensuring Patient Access to, and Safe Management of, Controlled Medicines Notice Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy are required. APCA and the publisher of this work have checked with sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of this publication. However, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in sciences, neither APCA nor the publisher nor any other party who have been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omission or for the results obtained from use of the information contained herein. African Palliative Care Association Foreword The 59th Session of the World Health conventions. Several countries make the Assembly of the UN adopted resolution importation, storage, distribution and 58.22, thereby recognising the dispensing of controlled medicines more importance of improving pain relief restrictive than is needed. Additionally, using opioid analgesics and calling on it is a requirement for countries to member states to remove barriers to provide detailed annual estimates and their medical use and availability. reports for narcotic substances to the International Narcotic Control Board to While advances have been made pursuing procure or produce controlled medicines. this agenda in Africa (e.g. legalisation of However, formulating reliable estimates oral morphine prescription rights for nurses is often a barrier to accessing controlled and clinical officers in Uganda, approval medicines, while the procurement of access to morphine for hospices of opioids is subject to complex and in Zambia, and advocacy progress in lengthy exportation and importation Malawi and Kenya), challenges remain.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Narcotic Drugs Under International Control
    International Narcotics Control Board Yellow List Annex to Forms A, B and C 59th edition, July 2020 LIST OF NARCOTIC DRUGS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Prepared by the INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD* Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 500 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Internet address: http://www.incb.org/ in accordance with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961** Protocol of 25 March 1972 amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 * On 2 March 1968, this organ took over the functions of the Permanent Central Narcotics Board and the Drug Supervisory Body, r etaining the same secretariat and offices. ** Subsequently referred to as “1961 Convention”. V.20-03697 (E) *2003697* Purpose The Yellow List contains the current list of narcotic drugs under international control and additional relevant information. It has been prepared by the International Narcotics Control Board to assist Governments in completing the annual statistical reports on narcotic drugs (Form C), the quarterly statistics of imports and exports of narcotic drugs (Form A) and the estimates of annual requirements for narcotic drugs (Form B) as well as related questionnaires. The Yellow List is divided into four parts: Part 1 provides a list of narcotic drugs under international control in the form of tables and is subdivided into three sections: (1) the first section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule I of the 1961 Convention as well as intermediate opiate raw materials; (2) the second section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule II of the 1961 Convention; and (3) the third section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule IV of the 1961 Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • NSDUH MRB Instrumentation Protocol Changes
    Instrumentation Protocol Changes The 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) instrumentation protocols underwent several modifications from the protocols employed for the 2014 NSDUH. A summary of the changes for the 2015 NSDUH can be divided into three topics: (1) the computer-assisted interviewing (CAI) tablet screening instrument, (2) the CAI questionnaire, and (3) the interviewer materials. 1. Screening Instrument Using the 2014 Screening Application as a base, questions, response options, and informed consent wording were modified for the 2015 Screening Application. Listed below are the Screening Application changes for 2015: • As necessary, dates were updated in the screening program. • As necessary, specification updates were made to reflect current tablet screening programming and format. • Response options in the Spanish-language screener have been translated into Spanish. • In the Study Introduction, "Research Triangle Institute" has been replaced with "RTI International," and "U.S. Public Health Service" has been replaced with "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services." • All ePTE data screens were removed. • Field Interviewer (FI) Debriefing Questions were moved from the CAI Questionnaire to the screening tablet, to be administered after leaving the household. They are now documented as "Section 9, FI Debriefing Questions," within the NSDUH Screening Specifications document. 2. CAI Questionnaire Using the 2014 CAI Questionnaire as a base, questions and routing were modified for the 2015 CAI Questionnaire. Listed below are the CAI Questionnaire changes for 2015: Introduction • The CAI instrument version, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number, and OMB expiration date were updated in the Introduction section. • The OMB control number was also updated in the Public Reporting Burden statement.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/085719 Al 5 June 2014 (05.06.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/085719 Al 5 June 2014 (05.06.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61M 15/00 (2006.01) A24F 47/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/US20 13/072426 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 27 November 2013 (27.1 1.2013) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (30) Priority Data: ZW. 61/730,738 28 November 2012 (28. 11.2012) US 61/794,601 15 March 2013 (15.03.2013) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/83 1,992 6 June 2013 (06.06.2013) us kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/887,045 4 October 201 3 (04.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics on Narcotic Drugs for 1967
    E/INCB/3 INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD Geneva STATISTICS ON NARCOTIC DRUGS FOR 1967 furnished by Governments in accordance with the International Treaties and MAXIMUM LEVELS OF OPIUM STOCKS UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD Geneva STATISTICS ON NARCOTIC DRUGS FOR 1967 furnished by Governments in accordance with the International Treaties and MAXIMUM LEVELS OF OPIUM STOCKS UNITED NATIONS New York, 1968 E/INCB/3 December 1968 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales number : E. 69. XI. 2 Price: $U.S. 1.50 (or equivalent in other currencies) TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs Page FOREWORD 1-6 VII TRENDS IN THE LICIT MOVEMENT OF NARCOTIC DRUGS 7-87 VII General trends 7-10 VII Opium 11-22 VIII Poppy straw and poppy straw concentrate 23-30 IX Coca leaf 31-33 XI Cannabis 34-37 XI Manufactured drugs 38-87 XII Opium and coca-leaf alkaloids and their derivatives 38-66 XII Morphine 38-42 XII Codeine 43-49 XII Ethylmorphine 50-55 XIII Heroin 56-59 XIV Other derivatives of opium alkaloids 60-64 XIV Cocaine 65-66 xv " Synthetic " narcotic drugs 67-87 xv Pethidine-intermediates-A, -B and -C 67 xv Pethidine 68-72 XVII Trimeperidine 73 XVII Methadone-intermediate 74 XVII Methadone 75-76 XVIII Normethadone 77-78 XVIII Moramide-intermediate, racemoramide, dextromoramide and levomora¬ mide 79-81 XVIII Other " synthetic " narcotic drugs 82-87 XIX — III — ANNEXES Page Introductory note 2 A. — RECEIPT OF STATISTICS FOR 1967 Countries and territories which sent in all their returns 3 Missing quarterly and annual statistics 4 B. — SYNOPTIC TABLES Index of countries and territories mentioned in the tables 6 Narcotic drugs falling under the International Conventions 9 Chart showing successive phases from the production of the raw material to the consumption of the finished product, with references to tables 12 Explanatory note 13 Table I.
    [Show full text]
  • Macdonald V Mcginniss
    MacDonald vs. McGinniss Trial Transcript i. UNITED STATES DIRSTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 HONORABLE WILLIAM J. REA, JUDGE PRESIDINC 5 G 7 8 DR. JEFFREY R- MAC DONALD, 9 Plaintiff 10 vs. No. CV 84-6170-WJR 11 JOE-MC GINNISS, 12 Defendant. 13 v\ 14 m .\ ^ REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 16-. Los Angeles, California 17 Thursday, July 30, 1987 18 19 20 21 Sherrill Boutte, CSR Official Court Reporter 22 402 United States Courthouse v.. 312 North Spring Street 23 Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 613-1381 24 25 INDEX I 2 3 4 WITNESSES 5 6 PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS: , DIRECT' CROSS REDIRECT RE-CROSS : 7 MAC DONALD, JEFFREY' R.' "•> 4 8 I 9 10 ... >*-• 11 12 13 EXHIBITS. >; 14 B* (FOR*-- 15 EXHIBIT '' ID ENTIFI CAT I ON >\r"TEV/I~DENCE 16 159 5 17 474 58 5 8 .-M; IS 475 58 59 19 476 59 59 20 21 22 REPORTED BY: 23 Sherrill Boutte Pages 3 56 3*., Sft' 24 Kathleen Haaland 57 87 25 -••V "-^ A .• v*e_ \v , 1 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA; THURSDAY, JULY 30, 1987; 10:00 AM to 2 r THE CLERK: Civil 84-6170-WJR, a f i 4 Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald vs. Joe McGinniss. Counsel, please state your appearances. 5 6 MR. BOSTWICK: Good morning, your Honor. 7 Gary Bostwick and Jo-Ann Horn on behalf of the plaintiff. i Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald. 8 9 MR. KORNSTEIN: Good morning, your Honor. Daniel Kornstein and Mark Piatt on behalf of the defendant, 10 Joe McGinniss. 11 THE COURT: All right.
    [Show full text]
  • 145677NCJRS.Pdf
    ,. "I ~- 1 _ .. If you have issues viewing or accessing this file• contact• us at NCJRS.gov.• a .~ .. A ~-.- .. , , , ... ,T:,: , I " 145677 • • U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating It. Points of vieW or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been gra~~~ti tute for Substance Abuse Research to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. • " , '41!'~- • \..s " t CONTENTS Preface Quiz Parents Schools Marijuana Hashish Hashish Oil Opium Heroin Dilaudid ~2'1:>':'S-t'Jhm~·';"la"·~¥s'"r.':Jt,r;\;~)'!(,"iii,,';~,:j~'i:l;:i~;i~iJ\t:~.. ~~ ,,'~ - H :'" • i' b ":l,' ~~,,] .• :;<",,\/,,::'y,'.P\ '-1';;. ;;~'''1.W'··· .:'t''''';~'l;>;-·:t.lW;i~:\·~/~;~~;;;:~i·' ~ Cocaine Smoking Cocaine Amphetamines/Methamphetamines Clandestine LSD·25 PCP Mescaline Psilocybin· Psilocyn Mushrooms [4zTnhalants~'-',,-'~~--- ~~ Steroids Prescription Drugs Most Abused Designer Drugs The Look-alikes Alcohol Plus Other Drugs Warning Signs of Alcoholism Tobacco Smokeless Tobacco 65 Glossary of Slang Terms 67 References ~~~~~~~----------,.----- The following true story was related by Mrs. Chantal Devine, wife ofthe Honorable Grant Devine, Premier of Saskatchewan, at the PRIDE Canada National Conference on Youth and Drugs in May, 1988 in Ottawa. The story was told to Mrs. Devine by Father Lucien Larre, a priest in Saskatchewan and a founder of Bosco Homes, a home for delinquent boys.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables
    Key Definitions for the 2010 Detailed Tables and National Findings Report This glossary provides definitions for many of the measures and terms used in these tables and in the national findings report1 from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Where relevant, cross-references also are provided. For some key terms, specific question wording, including "feeder questions" that precede the question(s), is provided for clarity. Abuse Abuse of illicit drugs or alcohol was defined as meeting one or more of the four criteria for abuse included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)2 and if the definition for dependence was not met for that substance. Additional criteria for alcohol and marijuana abuse include the use of these substances on 6 or more days in the past 12 months. These questions have been included in the survey since 2000. Responses to the dependence or abuse questions based only on the past year use of methamphetamine, Ambien®, Adderall®, or specific hallucinogens from the routing patterns added between 2005 and 2008 were not included in these measures. See Section B.4.2 of Appendix B in the 2010 national findings report for additional details. SEE: "Dependence," "Need for Illicit Drug or Alcohol Use Treatment," and "Prevalence." Adderall® Use Measures of use of the prescription stimulant Adderall® in the respondent's lifetime, the past year, and the past month were developed from responses to the noncore question about recency of use: "Earlier, the computer recorded that you have used Adderall that was not prescribed for you or that you took only for the experience or feeling it caused.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Narcotic Drugs Under International Control
    International Narcotics Control Board YYeellllooww LLiisstt Annex to Forms A, B and C 50th edition, December 2011 LIST OF NARCOTIC DRUGS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Prepared by the INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD* Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 500 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Internet address: http://www.incb.org/ in accordance with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961** Protocol of 25 March 1972 amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 ___________ * On 2 March 1968, this organ took over the functions of the Permanent Central Narcotics Board and the Drug Supervisory Body, retaining the same secretariat and offices. ** Subsequently referred to as “1961 Convention”. Purpose The Yellow List contains the current list of narcotic drugs under international control and additional relevant information. It has been prepared by the International Narcotics Control Board to assist Governments in completing the annual statistical reports on narcotic drugs (Form C), the quarterly statistics of imports and exports of narcotic drugs (Form A) and the estimates of annual requirements for narcotic drugs (Form B) as well as related questionnaires. The Yellow List is divided into four parts: Part 1 provides a list of narcotic drugs under international control in form of tables and is subdivided into three sections: (1) the first section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule I of the 1961 Convention and/or Group I of the 1931 Convention; (2) the second section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule II of the 1961 Convention and/or Group II of the 1931 Convention; and (3) the third section includes the narcotic drugs listed in Schedule IV of the 1961 Convention and/or Group II of the 1931 Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam County DUI Court Program PARTICIPANT VACATION REQUEST
    PUTNAM COUNTY DUI COURT PROGRAM PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome ...........................................................................................................................................3 Overview ...........................................................................................................................................3 Confidentiality ...................................................................................................................................3 Fourth Amendment Waiver & Search and Arrest Requirements ......................................................4 DUI Court Hearings ..........................................................................................................................4 Progress Reports ................................................................................................................................5 Termination from DUI Court ............................................................................................................5 Minimum Sanctions ..........................................................................................................................5 Incentives ..........................................................................................................................................6 DUI Court Program Rules .................................................................................................................6 Phases of DUI Court .........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]