DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference of the Society for Literature and Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 406 221 SE 059 962 AUTHOR Perkowitz, Sidney, Ed. TITLE Conference of the Society for Literature and Science. Proceedings (Atlanta, Georgia, October 10-13, 1996) . INSTITUTION Society for Literature and Science, Atlanta, GA. PUB DATE Oct 96 NOTE 207p. AVAILABLE FROM Society for Literature and Science, 580 Cresthill Avenue, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30306. PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Art; Artificial Intelligence; Biology; Cybernetics; Elementary Secondary Education; *Epistemology; Genetics; Higher Education; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Internet; Knowledge Representation; Literature; Metaphors; Physics; *Science and Society; Scientists; Sex Differences; Teaching Methods; Technology; World Wide Web IDENTIFIERS Georgia ABSTRACT The papers contained in these proceedings from the 1996 Society for Literature and Science Conference are organized into sections based on theme. Some of these themes are:(1) Secularizing Enlightenment;(2) Eugenics and the Politics of Knowledge; (3) Reading the Discourses of Psychology;(4) Women and Medicine;(5) The Rhetoric of Public Health;(6) Cyberpunk and Popular Culture; (7) The Cultural Work of Cognitive Science;(8) Scientist's Lives and Writings;(9) Disease and Literature; (10) Narratives and Epistemology of Science; (11) Print and Its Discontents; (12) The Rhetoric of Science;(13) Complexity and Chaos;(14) Science and Religion;(15) Aspects of Science and Culture;(16) Cultural Studies of Technoscience; (17) Environment and Nature;(18) Science and Opera;(19) Postmodern Poetics; (20) Late 19th Century Science; and (21) Shakespeare Studies. (DDR) ********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document. *********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND Office of Educational Research and Improvement SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL DUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION HAS EE GRANTED BY CENTER (ERIC) The ERIC Facility has assigned document has been reproduced as this document for processingSC received from the person or organization to: originating it. t In our judgment, this document Minor changes have been made to is also of interest to the Clear. improve reproduction quality. inghouses noted to the right. Indexing should reflect their special points of view. Points of view or opinions stated in this TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES document do not necessarily represent INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) official OERI position or policy. 996 CONFERENCE Eri2 El 0,SOCIETY FRLITERATURE AND E SHERATON 50LONY S UARE OTEL AITLANTA EORGIA 99 o ri SPONSOREDa BY: EMORY UNIVERS! ADDITIONAL S PPORT FROM. IA INSTITUT OFTE640LOGY LENAR SPEAKERS:* RONALD rionFmANN PAULA TREICHIER =2 IQ 3EST COPY AVAILABLE 1996 Conference Society for Literature and Science Sheraton Colony Square Hotel Atlanta, Georgia October 10 - 13, 1996 Sponsored by: Emory University with additional support from Georgia Institute of Technology Site Coordinator: Sidney Perkowitz, Emory University Additional Coordination: Carol Colatrella: Georgia Institute of Technology Program Committee: Anne Balsamo, Georgia Institute of Technology Katherine Benson, Emory University Ronald Bogue, University of Georgia Rebecca Merrens, Georgia Institute of Technology Editor. Sidney Perkowitz, Emory University Layout and Design: Edward P. Curry, Georgia Institute of Technology Printing: Omni Press, Inc. Copyright 1996, Society for Literature and Science 3 General Information 1996 Meeting of the Society for Literature andScience Welcome to the 1996 Annual Meeting of the Society for Literature and Science.This abstract book contains: general conference information (this page) diagram of meeting rooms grids showing meeting times and locations detailed schedule/table of contents abstracts arranged by session and presented in chronological order (except for those not received in time for inclusion) index of participants, titles mentioned in abstracts, and weywords Meeting Arrangements Meeting Rooms All plenary sessions, the six parallel contributed sessions, and refreshment,meal, and reception functions will be held on the Lobby and Ballroom Levels of the Sheraton ColonySquare Hotel. The hotel map and room locater grid presented on the followingpages will direct you to the various locations. Registration and Conference Information The Registration Desk will be in the foyer immediately outside the Grand Ballroom.It will be staffed throughout the meeting to assist with registration andany other conference matters, 4 p.m. 8:00 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 10; 8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday; 9:00 a.m. - noon, Sunday. Messages will be posted here. Audio-Visual Equipment Audio-Visual equipment has been provided as requestedon your registration form. We suggest that speakers check that the correct equipment has been placed in theproper room, and is operational, in advance of their scheduled talks. Please report problems to theRegistration Desk as far in advance as possible. Dining, attractions, and transportation Information about restaurants and attractions will be available at theRegistration Desk. The hotel adjoins the Colony Square Mall, with options for breakfast, lunch, and dinner,shops, and services. Other dining choices lie within a block of the hotel. MARTA trainsto downtown and uptown Atlanta can be boarded at the Arts Center station,a five-minute walk from the hotel. Please note that lunch on Saturday, October 12 is included in the registration fee, andwill be served in the Grand Ballroom. Tours Information about tours of the Centers for Disease Control and the Yerkes PrimateCenter will be available at the Registration Desk. Guidelines for talks and session chairs We ask that contributed talks be no longer than 12 minutes, and that chairsremind speakers of this limit to ensure ample time for all presentations and discussions ina session. In the event that the chair listed for a given session does notappear by ten minutes after the scheduled time, we ask that the first speaker listed serve as chair. 4 SLS '96, October 10 - 13, 1996 Atlanta, Georgia Book display A selection of books of interest to SLS members will be displayed for sale in the Collier Room by The Scholar's Choice, and by Duke University Press. We expect these to include recent works by Roald Hofmann, Paula Treichler, Sidney Perkowitz, and many other contributors to the meeting. A conference discount will be available. Meeting Room Diagrams, Sheraton Colony Square Hotel Service BEST COPY AVAILABLE ii 6 General Information Meeting Schedule I Time Thu:04day, Oct* 10 Friday,.Oct.11 i Saturday, Oct. 12 Sunday, Oct. 13 Sam Session 6: 8 - 9:30' 15:30 Se ion S 9:30 Refreshments 10:00 iess'on 7i 10 - 11:30 , 10:15 aT, Session 0 1L45 10:30 11:30 SLS lunch and business meeting 11:45 Refreshments 12 p-up'Sion: 2 1100/1. -1 1:00 east 2 :3{ 1:30 Qa 0 2:30 2:45 3:00 3:15 Session 3:15 » 4:45 4:00 4:15 Refreshments 4:45 ssiank4:45:7,61,5Refreshments 5:00 "k S&Lsion 1Mc-64 6:15 6:30 7:00 ,PleaarY Se's** 7:30 lenary Sossio 8:00 Reception 8:30 Reception 9:00 SLS dancing NOTES: There is a 15-minute break between Session 3, ending at 2:30 pm, and Session 4, beginning at 2:45 pm, that is not shown on the chart. Registration continues daily. BEST COPYAVA6LABLE in SLS '96, October 10 - 13, 1996 Atlanta, Georgia Meeting Room Locater kThurs .Oct 10 Fni '=:Oct.1 'Sat. Oct 12 Sun l'Oct.13. Registration Ballroom Foyer Ballroom Foyer Ballroom Foyer Ballroom Foyer Plenary and reception Ballroom Ballroom Lunch, business Ballroom meeting Refreshments Habersham Habersham Habersham Foyer Book display Collier Collier Collier A topical sessions Habersham Ansley Ansley B topical sessions Ardmore Ardmore Ardmore C topical sessions Brookwood Brookwood Brookwood D topical sessions Morningside Fulton Fulton E topical sessions Georgia Georgia Georgia F topical sessions Piedmont Piedmont Piedmont Wrap-up session Habersham Contributed talks are divided into six topical sessions labelled A through F, for each of twelve morning and afternoon time slots on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. The location of each topical session, for all time slots, is given in the table above. iv 7 Table of Contents/Meeting Schedule Table of Contents/Meeting Schedule Meeting Arrangements Meeting Rooms Registration and Conference Information Audio-Visual Equipment Dining, attractions, and transportation Tours Guidelines for talks and session chairs Book display ii Meeting Room Diagrams, Sheraton Colony Square Hotel ii Meeting Schedule iii Meeting Room Locater iv Table of Contents/Meeting Schedule Thursday, October 10, 4:00 - 8:00 pm: Registration (Ballroom Foyer) 1 Thursday, October 10, 7:00 - 8:00 pm: Plenary Session (Ballroom) [Reception Follows] 1 Paula Treichler: Will Theorizing About the Social Construction of Aids Help Cure Aids? Top Ten Reasons Alan Sokol Should Have Said Yes 1 Friday, October 11, 1996, 8:30 - 10:00 am: Session 1 1 Session 1A: Secularizing Enlightenment: Readings in Early Modern Literature of Science (Habersham Room) 1 Utopianism, Colonialism, Science: Francis Bacon's The New Atlantis; Hilary Strang, Carnegie Mellon University 2 Bewitching Quackery: Naturalism and the Rise of Professional Medicine; Samantha Fenno, Carnegie Mellon University 2 Hybrids in the Enlightenment: Bruno Latour and The Transactioneer; Angela Todd, Carnegie Mellon University 4 Literature and Science in
Recommended publications
  • Woman War Correspondent,” 1846-1945

    Woman War Correspondent,” 1846-1945

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE: THE UNITED STATES MILITARY, THE PRESS, AND THE “WOMAN WAR CORRESPONDENT,” 1846-1945 Carolyn M. Edy A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Jean Folkerts W. Fitzhugh Brundage Jacquelyn Dowd Hall Frank E. Fee, Jr. Barbara Friedman ©2012 Carolyn Martindale Edy ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract CAROLYN M. EDY: Conditions of Acceptance: The United States Military, the Press, and the “Woman War Correspondent,” 1846-1945 (Under the direction of Jean Folkerts) This dissertation chronicles the history of American women who worked as war correspondents through the end of World War II, demonstrating the ways the military, the press, and women themselves constructed categories for war reporting that promoted and prevented women’s access to war: the “war correspondent,” who covered war-related news, and the “woman war correspondent,” who covered the woman’s angle of war. As the first study to examine these concepts, from their emergence in the press through their use in military directives, this dissertation relies upon a variety of sources to consider the roles and influences, not only of the women who worked as war correspondents but of the individuals and institutions surrounding their work. Nineteenth and early 20th century newspapers continually featured the woman war correspondent—often as the first or only of her kind, even as they wrote about more than sixty such women by 1914.
  • What We Mean When We Talk About Suffering—And Why Eric Cassell Should Not Have the Last Word

    What We Mean When We Talk About Suffering—And Why Eric Cassell Should Not Have the Last Word

    What We Mean When We Talk About Suffering—and Why Eric Cassell Should Not Have the Last Word Tyler Tate, Robert Pearlman Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Volume 62, Number 1, Winter 2019, pp. 95-110 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/722412 Access provided at 26 Apr 2019 00:52 GMT from University of Washington @ Seattle What We Mean When We Talk About Suffering—and Why Eric Cassell Should Not Have the Last Word Tyler Tate* and Robert Pearlman† ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the phenomenon of suffering and its relation- ship to medical practice by focusing on the paradigmatic work of Eric Cassell. First, it explains Cassell’s influential model of suffering. Second, it surveys various critiques of Cassell. Next it outlines the authors’ concerns with Cassell’s model: it is aggressive, obscure, and fails to capture important features of the suffering experience. Finally, the authors propose a conceptual framework to help clarify the distinctive nature of sub- jective patient suffering. This framework contains two necessary conditions: (1) a loss of a person’s sense of self, and (2) a negative affective experience. The authors suggest how this framework can be used in the medical encounter to promote clinician-patient communication and the relief of suffering. *Center for Ethics in Health Care and School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. †National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, and School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. Correspondence: Tyler Tate, Oregon Health and Science University, School of Medicine, Depart- ment of Pediatrics, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098.
  • Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

    Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

    ENINE PRIZEU WINNINGP AUTHORSL FROM ESTONIA, LATVIA AND LITHUANIA Tiit Aleksejev (EE) • Laura Sintija Černiauskaitė (LT) • Meelis Friedenthal (EE) Estonia Janis Joņevs (LV) • Paavo Matsin (EE) • Giedra Radvilavičiūtė(LT) Latvia Lithuania The London Book Fair Undinė Radzevičiūtė (LT) • Osvalds Zebris (LV) • Inga Žolude (LV) Market Focus 2018 Printed by Bietlot, Belgique Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Texts, translations, photos and other materials present in the publication have been licensed for use to the EUPL consortium by authors or other copyright holders who may prohibit reuse, reproduction or other use of their works. Please contact the EUPL consortium with any question about reuse or reproduction of specific text, translation, photo or other materials present. Print PDF ISBN 978-92-79-73959-0 ISBN 978-92-79-73960-6 doi:10.2766/054389 doi:10.2766/976619 NC-04-17-886-EN-C NC-04-17-886-EN-N © original graphic design by Kaligram.be www.euprizeliterature.eu Estonia Latvia Lithuania The London Book Fair Market Focus 2018 EUPLNINE PRIZE WINNING AUTHORS FROM ESTONIA, LATVIA AND LITHUANIA www.euprizeliterature.eu Estonia Latvia Lithuania The London Book Fair Market Focus 2018 Table of Content Table of Content Forewords: Foreword ........................................................................... 5 European Commission 5 Estonia 6 EUPL Dutch speaking Winners Latvia 7 2010 – Belgium Lithuania 9 Peter Terrin – De Bewaker ............................................................ 7 EUPL Baltic’s winners: 2011 – The Netherlands Rodaan al Galidi – De autist en de postduif ........................................
  • Argentuscon Had Four Panelists Piece, on December 17

    Argentuscon Had Four Panelists Piece, on December 17

    Matthew Appleton Georges Dodds Richard Horton Sheryl Birkhead Howard Andrew Jones Brad Foster Fred Lerner Deb Kosiba James D. Nicoll Rotsler John O’Neill Taral Wayne Mike Resnick Peter Sands Steven H Silver Allen Steele Michael D. Thomas Fred Lerner takes us on a literary journey to Portugal, From the Mine as he prepared for his own journey to the old Roman province of Lusitania. He looks at the writing of two ast year’s issue was published on Christmas Eve. Portuguese authors who are practically unknown to the This year, it looks like I’ll get it out earlier, but not Anglophonic world. L by much since I’m writing this, which is the last And just as the ArgentusCon had four panelists piece, on December 17. discussing a single topic, the first four articles are also on What isn’t in this issue is the mock section. It has the same topic, although the authors tackled them always been the most difficult section to put together and separately (mostly). I asked Rich Horton, John O’Neill, I just couldn’t get enough pieces to Georges Dodds, and Howard Andrew Jones make it happen this issue. All my to compile of list of ten books each that are fault, not the fault of those who sent out of print and should be brought back into me submissions. The mock section print. When I asked, knowing something of may return in the 2008 issue, or it may their proclivities, I had a feeling I’d know not. I have found something else I what types of books would show up, if not think might be its replacement, which the specifics.
  • Blending Between Occultism and Scientism in Vasile Voiculescu's

    Blending Between Occultism and Scientism in Vasile Voiculescu's

    Article received on November 10, 2017 and accepted for publishing on February 18, 2018. ORIGINAL ARTICLES Blending between occultism and scientism in Vasile Voiculescu’s short stories Mirela Radu1 Abstract: Vasile Voiculescu (1884-1963), besides being a well-known writer, was also a prominent, much respected physician who practiced between the two world wars. He attended the courses of the Faculty of Letters and Philosophy in Bucharest for a year (1902-1903), but gave up on them in order to attend the Faculty of Medicine. The literary debut took place in 1912 in the journal Convorbiri literare. He published the first volume of lyrical poems in 1916 and in 1918 he was granted the Academy Award for lyrical volume From the Aurochs Country and other poems. In 1935 he became a member of the Academy of Sciences of Romania and in 1941 he received the National Poetry Prize. The following volumes of poems are: Ripeness (1921), Poems with Angels (1927), Destiny (1933), Ascent (1937), Gleams (1939). His work also includes a short story: The Demiurge (1943). Shakespeare's last imaginative sonnets in Vasile Voiculescu’s translation (1964), and the novel Zahei-The blind (1966), Sentimental Gymnastics (1972) are published posthumously. The present article is aimed at revealing the world of Voiculescu’s short stories. Keywords: medical studies, abyssal psychology, scientism, mystery, obscurity Although the most analyzed creator received new powers, as a sum of his life’s and part of Voiculescu’s work artistic experience by a high level of expression, in a seems to be his poetry, he veritable eruption if poetry, in verses and prose.” [2] proved his worth in the same The surprise comes from the chameleonic nature of manner in storytelling.
  • Healing Narrative: Ethics and Writing About Patients

    Healing Narrative: Ethics and Writing About Patients

    Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics July 2011, Volume 13, Number 7: 420-424. FROM THE EDITOR Healing Narrative—Ethics and Writing about Patients As Jack Coulehan and Anne Hawkins put it, “writing about patients is a growth industry” [1]. Recent years have seen an explosion of both fiction and nonfiction works written by physicians for a popular audience. Atul Gawande’s Complications, Pauline Chen’s Final Exam, and Danielle Ofri’s Singular Intimacies, all critically acclaimed and widely read, open a window into an experience that was once the sole province of those in medical training. These authors employ patient stories to convey poignant insights about what it is like to practice medicine. Neurologist Oliver Sacks’s classic Awakenings and more recent An Anthropologist on Mars also make use of patient stories, guiding his readers into the awe-inspiring world of the human mind through the unusual experiences of his patients. These powerful memoirs, however, move us to ask, whose stories are they telling? What are physicians’ responsibilities towards patients when they put them on paper? In this issue of Virtual Mentor, we explore the ethics of writing about patients and examine the sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic duties of physician and author. Sharing patient stories has always been a mainstay of medical education—every issue of Virtual Mentor begins with three clinical cases. This is not an arbitrary quirk but a reflection of a long tradition. Clinicians share patient stories on the wards, in grand rounds, in doctors’ lounges; they tell patient stories to medical trainees and teach them the language in which to tell these stories themselves.
  • Material Culture, Theoretical Culture, and Delocalization

    Material Culture, Theoretical Culture, and Delocalization

    PETER GALISON Material Culture, Theoretical Culture, and Delocalization Collection, laboratory, and theater – all face the unavoidable problem of moving the specific, tangible reality of a highly refined local circum- stance into a wider domain, if not of the universal, at least out of the here and now. In the study of science, simply recognizing the inevitably local origins of science has been an enormous accomplishment, perhaps the signal achievement of science studies over the past twenty years. But we then need to understand, again in specific terms, how this lo- cally-produced knowledge moves, how – without invoking an other- wise unexplained process of ‘generalization’ – scientific work is de- localized. My work over the last years (e.g. Image and Logic)1 has aimed at this goal, folding the local back on the local, so to speak, by asking how the local cultures of science link up through the piecewise coordination of bits of languages, objects, procedures. I have in mind much more austere and less grand ideas than the ‘translation,’ ‘trans- mission,’ or ‘diffusion’ of pre-existing meanings. Instead, my focus is on the way bare-bone trading may occur between different subcultures of science, or between subcultures of science and bits of the wider world in which they are fundamentally embedded. In this picture, nei- ther language nor the world of things changes all of a piece, and talk of world-changing Gestalt shifts give way to the particular building-up of scientific jargons, pidgins, and creoles. These trading languages be- come important as do shared bits of apparatus or fragments of theoreti- cal manipulation.
  • Human-Machine Communication

    Human-Machine Communication

    Volume 2, 2021 ISSN 2638-602X (print)/ISSN 2638-6038 (online) Human-Machine Communication ISSN 2638-602X (print)/ISSN 2638-6038 (online) Copyright © 2021 Human-Machine Communication www.hmcjournal.com Human-Machine Communication (HMC) is an annual peer-reviewed, open access publication of the Communication and Social Robotics Labs (combotlabs.org), published with support from the Nicholson School of Communication and Media at the University of Central Florida. Human- Machine Communication (Print: ISSN 2638-602X) is published in the spring of each year (Online: ISSN 2638-6038). Institutional, organizational, and individual subscribers are invited to purchase the print edition using the following mailing address: Human-Machine Communication (HMC) Communication and Social Robotics Labs Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Ave. 300 Sprau Tower Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Print Subscriptions: Regular US rates: Individuals: 1 year, $40. Libraries and organizations may subscribe for 1 year, $75. If subscribing outside of the United States, please contact the Editor-in-Chief for current rate. Checks should be made payable to the Communication and Social Robotics Labs. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License . All articles in HMC are open access and can be distributed under the creative commons license. Human-Machine Communication Volume 2, 2021 Volume Editor Leopoldina Fortunati, University of Udine (Italy) Editor-in-Chief Autumn Edwards, Western Michigan University (U.S.A.) Associate Editors Patric R. Spence, University of Central Florida (U.S.A.) Chad Edwards, Western Michigan University (U.S.A.) Editorial Board Somaya Ben Allouch, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Netherlands) Maria Bakardjieva, University of Calgary (Canada) Jaime Banks, West Virginia University (U.S.A.) Naomi S.
  • The Art of Looking Back and the Reward of More Or Less Being Seen

    The Art of Looking Back and the Reward of More Or Less Being Seen

    The Art of Looking Back and the Reward of More or Less Being Seen The danger is in pleasing an immediate public: the immediate public that comes around you and takes you in and accepts you and gives you success and everything. Instead of that, you should wait for fifty years or a hundred years for your true public. That is the only public that interests me. Marcel Duchamp It is the REGARDEURS who make the pictures. Marcel Duchamp click to enlarge Figure 1 Jasper Johns, The Critic Sees, 1961 Our ability to believe our eyes is often overridden by our unquestioning confidence in the judgment of “experts”. As in Jasper John’s The Critic Sees(Fig. 1), we seem to put more trust in the words of these experts whose insights are often the reiteration of yet others’ conclusions, than in our own ability to bear down and witness what is before us. Marcel Duchamp understood the human tendency to categorize and simplify as well as rely on the filters of contemporary opinion to color observation; I believe he used this knowledge to make a powerful commentary on the state of affairs of modern thought and the direction that art was taking in his lifetime. Duchamp fought quietly against the move in twentieth century art towards the purely visual experience, the ‘retinal shudder’ as he put it, where “aesthetic delectation depends almost exclusively upon the sensitivity of the retina without any auxiliary interpretation.”(1) This auxiliary interpretation was to Duchamp the operation of the intellect in making and understanding art.
  • Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51, Number 4

    Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51, Number 4

    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 51 Number 4 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 51, Article 1 Number 4 1972 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51, Number 4 Florida Historical Society [email protected] Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Society, Florida Historical (1972) "Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51, Number 4," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 51 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol51/iss4/1 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51, Number 4 Published by STARS, 1972 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 51 [1972], No. 4, Art. 1 COVER Construction of Fort Zachary Taylor began in Key West in 1845 and it was completed in 1866. The original plans were drawn by Colonel Joseph Totten. A violent hurricane in 1846 destroyed most of the fort’s temporary work buildings and supplies, but construction was quickly resumed. Crafts- men for the brick work were imported from Germany and Ireland. Laborers were local slaves whose owners were paid $1.00 a day for their services. This is a view of the fort as drawn by a member of the garrison. It ap- peared in Harpers Weekly, March 2, 1861. Between 1898 and 1905, deciding that the fortress would be less vulnerable if not so tall, the structure was deliberately torn down to one story.
  • We Have Never Been Modern Pdf Free Download

    We Have Never Been Modern Pdf Free Download

    WE HAVE NEVER BEEN MODERN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Bruno Latour | 168 pages | 04 May 2011 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674948396 | English | Cambridge, Mass, United States We Have Never Been Modern PDF Book What difference does the scientific method make? Home About Publications Archive Index. We often encounter attempts to gauge the strength of faiths and denominations Act the Man and Build. The domains interact with one another, but they cannot, ought not, be confused. Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. View 4 excerpts, cites background. We have to keep up appearances, because being modern simply is the pretense that We are not Them. This forms the basis for Harman's Object Oriented Ontology. Church and ministry leadership resources to better equip, train and provide ideas for today's church and ministry leaders, like you. On March 24, I submitted the final copyedits for my new book …. Childish primitives that they were and are , pre-moderns muck everything up. With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. For moderns, the purification process is overt, while hybrids are denied even though modernity proliferates them. The imbroglios and networks that had no place now have the whole place to themselves. Inauguration and Vocation. Paradox 2: Nature is immanent, we construct it in a lab; society is not out construction, it is bio-fact that transcends us. Latour's book is largely a rumination on the phenomenon of modernity and how to create for ourselves a nonmodern world by ending the divide between social life and natural life.
  • A. Rodin a M. Aleš Podle M. Švabinského-2

    A. Rodin a M. Aleš Podle M. Švabinského-2

    Univerzita Karlova v Praze Filozofická fakulta Ústav pro d ějiny um ění Bakalá řská práce Anežka Ku čerová Kult um ělce na p řelomu století – A. Rodin a M. Aleš podle M. Švabinského The Cult of an Artist at the Turn of the Century - A. Rodin and M. Aleš by M. Švabinský Praha 2015 prof. PhDr. Roman Prahl, CSc. Pod ěkování Mé díky pat ří v první řad ě vedoucímu mé práce Prof. PhDr. Romanu Prahlovi, CSc., který m ě nejen inspiroval p ři volb ě tématu, ale také mi poskytl cenné rady a informace. Rovn ěž si cením vst řícnosti pracovník ů institucí, s nimiž jsem b ěhem svého bádání spolupracovala. Za všechny bych cht ěla zmínit Mgr. Tomáše Hylmara z archivu Národní galerie v Praze, Mgr. Stanislavu Brejchovou ze Studijního depozitá ře mobilních fond ů kláštera v Plasích, Mgr. Barboru Vláškovou z odd ělení um ěleckých sbírek Památníku národního písemnictví v Praze a Mgr. Jana Bílka z literárního archivu Památníku národního písemnictví v Praze. V neposlední řad ě bych cht ěla pod ěkovat mým rodi čů m za trp ělivost a podporu b ěhem psaní této práce. Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalá řskou práci vypracovala samostatn ě, že jsem řádn ě citovala všechny použité prameny a literaturu a že práce nebyla využita v rámci jiného vysokoškolského studia či k získání jiného nebo stejného titulu. V Praze dne 5. 5. 2015 ………………………….. Anežka Ku čerová Anotace Tato práce se zabývá formami prezentace a sebeprezentace dvou významných um ělc ů přelomu 19. a 20. století – českého malí ře Mikoláše Alše a francouzského socha ře Auguste Rodina.