Visual Field Defect Classification in the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Clinical science Visual field defect classification in the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center–Brien Holden Vision Institute High Myopia Registry Study Xiaohu Ding,1 Robert T Chang,1,2 Xinxing Guo,1 Xing Liu,1 Chris A Johnson,3 † Brien A Holden,4, Mingguang He1 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT myopia is rapidly becoming a major public health published online only. To view Purpose To describe a new combined myopia and problem.4 please visit the journal online fi fi (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ glaucoma visual eld classi cation system in order to The relationship between high myopia and bjophthalmol-2015-307942). report the visual field defects in a population of mostly POAG has been explored extensively in prior young Chinese high myopes aged 7–70 years. studies.5 However, accurate diagnosis of glaucoma fi 1 Methods A total of 1434 visual elds (including in the setting of high myopia is a challenge in clin- State Key Laboratory of confirmatory repeats of abnormal defects) from 487 high ical practice for two major reasons: (1) High Ophthalmology, Zhongshan ≤− Ophthalmic Center, myopes (sphere 6.0 D) were analysed from the myopia can cause tilted optic discs, large peripapil- Sun Yat-sen University, prospective Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center–Brien Holden lary atrophy obscuring the disc edge and shallow Guangzhou, China Vision Institute (ZOC–BHVI) High Myopia Registry Study. cupping without shifting of the vessels nasally, 2 Department of The predefined classification definitions covering high making the subjective interpretation of glaucomat- Ophthalmology, Byers Eye fi Institute at Stanford University, myopia and glaucoma categories were: normal, enlarged ous excavation more dif cult. (2) Although the Palo Alto, California, USA blind spot, abnormal suspect and abnormal with nine diagnosis of glaucoma relies upon characteristic 3Department of Ophthalmology subtypes. Two independent graders reviewed the first optic nerve cupping with associated progressive and Visual Sciences, University 150 of 1434 fields for initial grading calibration and the visual field loss, myopic degeneration can also of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA 4 remaining 1284 fields were used to assess intergrader cause similar glaucomatous-like visual field Brien Holden Vision Institute, 67 University of New South Wales, agreement. For the percentage distribution of visual defects. Therefore, patients need to be followed 8 Sydney, New South Wales, fields, the repeats and unreliable fields were excluded, over time to confirm true glaucoma progression. Australia leaving 894 fields. There is little information in the literature describ- Results The intergrader agreement of this combined ing the overall clinical characteristics of high Correspondence to fi κ fi Dr Robert T Chang, classi cation system was a value of 0.61 (95% CI myopes with visual eld defects or any prospective Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, 0.59 to 0.63). Among the 894 unique fields, the most data on how or if myopic defects change over time. 2452 Watson Ct, common visual field was normal at 33.7% followed by We were interested in determining how often Palo Alto CA 94303, USA; enlarged blind spot at 25.6%. The per cent of ‘arcuate- Chinese myopes have visual field defects that mimic [email protected] like’ field defects (combining nasal step, early arcuate glaucoma, particularly since many of those defects †Deceased 27 July 2015 and advanced arcuate) was 16.1% with advanced in young myopes may be minimally progressive and arcuate at 3.4%. not glaucomatous.9 Received 12 October 2015 Conclusions A proposed combined visual field In the present study, we first propose a broader Revised 15 February 2016 classification for high myopia and glaucoma combined classification system of visual field Accepted 22 February 2016 Published Online First demonstrates acceptable intergrader agreement. A total defects in high myopes to include both high 31 March 2016 of 16.1% of defects in young high myopes were found myopia and glaucoma types. After reporting the to mimic classic glaucomatous defects. These subjects intergrader agreement, we describe the baseline are being followed prospectively to assess which ones percentages of each field defect type in a large will progress to differentiate myopic from glaucomatous group of Chinese high myopes aged 7–70 with a field defects. median age of 17.4 years. The data collected, including visual fields, is part of an ongoing ZOC– BHVI High Myopia Registry Study that is designed INTRODUCTION to understand the natural history and pathogenesis Myopia morbidity continues to increase substan- of myopic retinopathy, initiated in November 2011 tially worldwide,1 especially in East Asians.2 in Guangzhou, China. Myopia can be corrected by spectacles, contact lens, or various intraocular or laser refractive sur- METHODS geries to achieve good vision. However, in high Ethics approval was obtained from the Zhongshan myopia, defined as worse than or equal to −6 diop- Ophthalmic Center Ethics Review Board. The tres sphere and also known as degenerative myopia, study was conducted in accordance with the tenets sight-threatening complications increase with many of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of potentially blinding conditions, such as myopic Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained degenerative retinopathy, macular scars, increased from all participants, or their parents or legal guar- primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and more dians if their age was <18 years. 3 To cite: Ding X, Chang RT, frequent retinal detachment. Unlike cataract or Guo X, et al. Br J age-related macular degeneration, which mainly Study population Ophthalmol affect the elderly population, high myopia also A longitudinal observational high myope registry – 2016;100:1697 1702. affects many young adults of working age; thus study was initiated in Guangzhou in 2011 and is Ding X, et al. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:1697–1702. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307942 1697 Clinical science expected to run until 2021. Subjects with high myopia, defined as worse than or equal to −6 dioptres sphere (not spherical equivalent) in both eyes, were recruited from both optometric clinic and a previous community screening population study in order to have more subjects older than 50 years.10 At baseline, a total of 895 participants were eligible and enrolled in the regis- try. However, only 487 subjects had visual field data. Baseline data collected in the high myopia registry included: cycloplegic refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, ocular biom- etry, external motility and slit lamp exam, lens opacity by the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS III) grading scale, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by Goldmann applana- tion, standard automatic perimetry, B-scan ultrasound, digital stereo fundus photography (Canon CX-1), autofluorescence (Heidelberg Spectralis) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT Optovue). Refraction was performed with an autorefractor (Topcon KR-8800) after cycloplegia. Ocular biometric parameters including axial length were obtained by optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS-900, Haag-Streit AG). Figure 1 The schema of our recruitment. Visual field examination A total of 487 subjects underwent bilateral standard automatic perimetry (Zeiss Humphrey Visual Field 750i, Carl Zeiss the established criteria to determine final percentages reported Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) on a separate return visit, from the unique 894 fields in which repeat or unreliable fields using the 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) had been removed. A total of 167 unreliable fields (13%) were fast, white-on-white, performed on a single machine. All visual removed. If the original and repeat field were both reliable, then fi elds were conducted in a single dark room without distraction the field with fewer false positives was chosen or fewer fixation (ambient light <5 lux) with a trained technician who explained losses if the false positives were the same. Thus, 167 unreliable to all subjects how to complete the test reliably. Each subject and 373 repeat visual fields were removed, arriving at the 894 fi had a short demonstration test before commencing the of cial visual field total for analysis (figure 1). examination. During the test, the technician also monitored the subject’s eye movement, and made adjustments as necessary to maintain proper fixation. Unreliable fields, defined as reach one Statistical analysis – of three criteria: false positive ≥15%, false negative ≥33% and Median, range and 25th 75th percentile were used to describe fixation loss ≥33%, were repeated immediately (up to two the non-normal distribution parameters. The agreement κ times) as well as any abnormal fields. From November 2011 to between two graders was assessed by , whose values of >0.7 August 2012, a total of 1434 visual fields (including repeats of are generally considered excellent and between 0.4 and 0.7 are abnormals) from 487 patients were available for our current considered as moderate. p<0.05 was considered statistically sig- fi visual field analysis, the outline of the recruitment was shown in ni cant. All statistics were performed using STATA (V.12.0, figure 1. Stata, College Station, Texas, USA). Visual field classification system and grading RESULTS In order to include visual field defect types associated with high Among the 487 participants, 229 (47.0%) were male and 258 myopia, new visual field grading criteria were drafted, consisting (53.0%) were female. The median age was 17.4 years, range of four major types: normal, enlarged blindness spot (at least 7–70 years, the 25% percentile was 13.3 years and 75% per- two abnormal edge point around the blind spot), suspicious for centile was 28.1 years. The median refraction was −8.6 D, range abnormal (minimum criteria for a defect but no pattern) and −6to−35 D, 25% and 75% percentiles were −7.4 and definitely abnormal (figure 2). The grading criteria for glau- −11.0 D, respectively. The median axial length was 27.2 mm, comatous defects were adapted from the Ocular Hypertension range 23.8–32.0 mm and the 25% and 75% percentiles were Treatment Study visual field criteria: nasal step, early arcuate, 26.3 and 28.1 mm, respectively (table 1).
Recommended publications
  • GUIDE for the Evaluation of VISUAL Impairment

    GUIDE for the Evaluation of VISUAL Impairment

    International Society for Low vision Research and Rehabilitation GUIDE for the Evaluation of VISUAL Impairment Published through the Pacific Vision Foundation, San Francisco for presentation at the International Low Vision Conference VISION-99. TABLE of CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PART 1 – OVERVIEW 3 Aspects of Vision Loss 3 Visual Functions 4 Functional Vision 4 Use of Scales 5 Ability Profiles 5 PART 2 – ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL FUNCTIONS 6 Visual Acuity Assessment 6 In the Normal and Near-normal range 6 In the Low Vision range 8 Reading Acuity vs. Letter Chart Acuity 10 Visual Field Assessment 11 Monocular vs. Binocular Fields 12 PART 3 – ESTIMATING FUNCTIONAL VISION 13 A General Ability Scale 13 Visual Acuity Scores, Visual Field Scores 15 Calculation Rules 18 Functional Vision Score, Adjustments 20 Examples 22 PART 4 – DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONAL VISION 24 Vision-related Activities 24 Creating an Activity Profile 25 Participation 27 PART 5 – DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND 28 Comparison to AMA scales 28 Statistical Use of the Visual Acuity Score 30 Comparison to ICIDH-2 31 Bibliography 31 © Copyright 1999 by August Colenbrander, M.D. All rights reserved. GUIDE for the Evaluation of VISUAL Impairment Summer 1999 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE Measurement Guidelines for Collaborative Studies of the National Eye Institute (NEI), This GUIDE presents a coordinated system for the Bethesda, MD evaluation of the functional aspects of vision. It has been prepared on behalf of the International WORK GROUP Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation (ISLRR) for presentation at The GUIDE was approved by a Work Group VISION-99, the fifth International Low Vision including the following members: conference.
  • 425-428 YOSHI:Shoja

    425-428 YOSHI:Shoja

    European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 19 no. 3, 2009 / pp. 425-428 Effects of astigmatism on the Humphrey Matrix perimeter TOSHIAKI YOSHII, TOYOAKI MATSUURA, EIICHI YUKAWA, YOSHIAKI HARA Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara - Japan PURPOSE. To evaluate the influence of astigmatism in terms of its amount and direction on the results of Humphrey Matrix perimetry. METHODS. A total of 31 healthy volunteers from hospital staff were consecutively recruited to undergo repeat testing with Humphrey Matrix 24-2 full threshold program with various induced simple myopic astigmatism. All subjects had previous experience (at least twice) with Matrix testing. To produce simple myopic astigmatism, a 0 diopter (D), +1 D, or +2 D cylindrical lens was added and inserted in the 180° direction and in the 90° direction after complete correction of distance vision. The influences of astigmatism were evaluated in terms of the mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and test duration (TD). RESULTS. A significant difference was observed only in the MD from five sessions. The MD in cases of 2 D inverse astigmatism was significantly lower than that in the absence of astig- matism. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with inverse myopic astigmatism of ≥ 2 D, the influences of astig- matism on the visual field should be taken into consideration when the results of Humphrey Matrix perimetry are evaluated. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19: 425-8) KEY WORDS. Astigmatism, Frequency doubling technology, FDT Matrix, Perimetry Accepted: October 10, 2008 INTRODUCTION as an FDT perimeter and became commercially available. In this perimeter, the examination time was shortened due Refractive error is one of the factors affecting the results to changes in the algorithm, the target size was made of perimetry.
  • Bass – Glaucomatous-Type Field Loss Not Due to Glaucoma

    Bass – Glaucomatous-Type Field Loss Not Due to Glaucoma

    Glaucoma on the Brain! Glaucomatous-Type Yes, we see lots of glaucoma Field Loss Not Due to Not every field that looks like glaucoma is due to glaucoma! Glaucoma If you misdiagnose glaucoma, you could miss other sight-threatening and life-threatening Sherry J. Bass, OD, FAAO disorders SUNY College of Optometry New York, NY Types of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Paracentral Defects Nasal Step Defects Arcuate and Bjerrum Defects Altitudinal Defects Peripheral Field Constriction to Tunnel Fields 1 Visual Field Defects in Very Early Glaucoma Paracentral loss Early superior/inferior temporal RNFL and rim loss: short axons Arcuate defects above or below the papillomacular bundle Arcuate field loss in the nasal field close to fixation Superotemporal notch Visual Field Defects in Early Glaucoma Nasal step More widespread RNFL loss and rim loss in the inferior or superior temporal rim tissue : longer axons Loss stops abruptly at the horizontal raphae “Step” pattern 2 Visual Field Defects in Moderate Glaucoma Arcuate scotoma- Bjerrum scotoma Focal notches in the inferior and/or superior rim tissue that reach the edge of the disc Denser field defects Follow an arcuate pattern connected to the blind spot 3 Visual Field Defects in Advanced Glaucoma End-Stage Glaucoma Dense Altitudinal Loss Progressive loss of superior or inferior rim tissue Non-Glaucomatous Etiology of End-Stage Glaucoma Paracentral Field Loss Peripheral constriction Hereditary macular Loss of temporal rim tissue diseases Temporal “islands” Stargardt’s macular due
  • Visual Pathways

    Visual Pathways

    Visual Pathways Michael Davidson Professor, Ophthalmology Diplomate, American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists Department of Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina, USA <[email protected]> Vision in Animals Miller PE, Murphy CJ. Vision in Dogs. JAVMA. 1995; 207: 1623. Miller PE, Murphy CJ. Equine Vision. In Equine Ophthalmology ed. Gilger BC. 2nd ed. 2011: pp 398- 433. Ofri R. Optics and Physiology of Vision. In Veterinary Ophthalmology. ed. Gelatt KN 5th ed. 2013: 208-270, Visual Pathways, Responses and Reflexes: Relevant Structures Optic n (CN II) – somatic afferent Oculomotor n (CN III), Trochlear n (CN IV), Abducens n (CN VI) – somatic efferent to extraocular muscles Facial n (CN VII)– visceral efferent to eyelids Rostral colliculi – brainstem center that mediates somatic reflexes in response to visual stimuli Cerebellum Cerebro-cortex esp. occipital lobe www.studyblue.com Visual Pathway Visual Cortex Optic Radiation Lateral Geniculate Body www.studyblue.com Visual Field each cerebral hemisphere receives information from contralateral visual field (“the area that can be seen when the eye is directed forward”) visual field Visual Fiber (Retinotopic) Segregation nasal retinal fibers decussate at chiasm, temporal retinal fibers remain ipsilateral Nasal Temporal Retina Retina Fibers Fibers Decussate Remain Ipsilateral OD Visual Field OS Total visual field OD temporal nasal hemifield hemifield temporal nasal fibers fibers Nasal Temporal Retina = Retina = Temporal
  • Visual Field Defects Essentials for Neurologists

    Visual Field Defects Essentials for Neurologists

    J Neurol (2003) 250:407–411 DOI 10.1007/s00415-003-1069-1 REVIEW Ulrich Schiefer Visual field defects Essentials for neurologists Introduction I The visual pathway – a highly sensitive “functional trip-wire” The visual pathway achieves neuronal signal transduc- tion between retinal photoreceptors, visual cortex and higher order visual areas. Lesions affecting this “trip- wire” will result in visual impairment which should in- duce the affected person to contact a physician. Correct interpretation of such symptoms and choice of appro- priate psychophysical examination methods will usually provide the examiner with specific information on topography and eventual progression, if baseline results are available [3,6].These data are essential prerequisites for effective neuroimaging, as well as for an adequate follow-up. Fig. 1 Functional anatomy of the human visual pathways Functional anatomy of the human visual pathways About 7 million cones and approximately 120 million The different sections of the visual pathways differ rods are distributed on the human retinal surface (area markedly with respect to the number,density and extent ~ 12 cm2). Each retinal element is directly linked to a of “intermixture” of neuronal elements, which will specific location within the visual field. More than strongly influence local resolution power and diagnos- 10 million bipolar cells forward the visual information tic relevance (Fig. 1). onto only 1.2 million ganglion cells.These cells are wide- spread on the retinal surface, and converge to 300–500 fibre-bundles with a total surface area of less than Received: 18 January 2003 0.2 cm2. There is a maximum neuronal density in the re- Accepted: 30 January 2003 gion of the optic chiasm: the entire visual information is “packed” into this “visual bottleneck” of about 1 cm3! In Prof.
  • Dominant Optic Atrophy

    Dominant Optic Atrophy

    Lenaers et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:46 http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/46 REVIEW Open Access Dominant optic atrophy Guy Lenaers1*, Christian Hamel1,2, Cécile Delettre1, Patrizia Amati-Bonneau3,4,5, Vincent Procaccio3,4,5, Dominique Bonneau3,4,5, Pascal Reynier3,4,5 and Dan Milea3,4,5,6 Abstract Definition of the disease: Dominant Optic Atrophy (DOA) is a neuro-ophthalmic condition characterized by a bilateral degeneration of the optic nerves, causing insidious visual loss, typically starting during the first decade of life. The disease affects primary the retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and their axons forming the optic nerve, which transfer the visual information from the photoreceptors to the lateral geniculus in the brain. Epidemiology: The prevalence of the disease varies from 1/10000 in Denmark due to a founder effect, to 1/30000 in the rest of the world. Clinical description: DOA patients usually suffer of moderate visual loss, associated with central or paracentral visual field deficits and color vision defects. The severity of the disease is highly variable, the visual acuity ranging from normal to legal blindness. The ophthalmic examination discloses on fundoscopy isolated optic disc pallor or atrophy, related to the RGC death. About 20% of DOA patients harbour extraocular multi-systemic features, including neurosensory hearing loss, or less commonly chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, myopathy, peripheral neuropathy, multiple sclerosis-like illness, spastic paraplegia or cataracts. Aetiology: Two genes (OPA1, OPA3) encoding inner mitochondrial membrane proteins and three loci (OPA4, OPA5, OPA8) are currently known for DOA. Additional loci and genes (OPA2, OPA6 and OPA7) are responsible for X-linked or recessive optic atrophy.
  • Anatomy and Physiology of the Afferent Visual System

    Anatomy and Physiology of the Afferent Visual System

    Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 102 (3rd series) Neuro-ophthalmology C. Kennard and R.J. Leigh, Editors # 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Chapter 1 Anatomy and physiology of the afferent visual system SASHANK PRASAD 1* AND STEVEN L. GALETTA 2 1Division of Neuro-ophthalmology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 2Neuro-ophthalmology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA INTRODUCTION light without distortion (Maurice, 1970). The tear–air interface and cornea contribute more to the focusing Visual processing poses an enormous computational of light than the lens does; unlike the lens, however, the challenge for the brain, which has evolved highly focusing power of the cornea is fixed. The ciliary mus- organized and efficient neural systems to meet these cles dynamically adjust the shape of the lens in order demands. In primates, approximately 55% of the cortex to focus light optimally from varying distances upon is specialized for visual processing (compared to 3% for the retina (accommodation). The total amount of light auditory processing and 11% for somatosensory pro- reaching the retina is controlled by regulation of the cessing) (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). Over the past pupil aperture. Ultimately, the visual image becomes several decades there has been an explosion in scientific projected upside-down and backwards on to the retina understanding of these complex pathways and net- (Fishman, 1973). works. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the visual The majority of the blood supply to structures of the system, in combination with skilled examination, allows eye arrives via the ophthalmic artery, which is the first precise localization of neuropathological processes.
  • Association Between Visual Field Damage and Corneal Structural

    Association Between Visual Field Damage and Corneal Structural

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Association between visual feld damage and corneal structural parameters Alexandru Lavric1*, Valentin Popa1, Hidenori Takahashi2, Rossen M. Hazarbassanov3 & Siamak Yousef4,5 The main goal of this study is to identify the association between corneal shape, elevation, and thickness parameters and visual feld damage using machine learning. A total of 676 eyes from 568 patients from the Jichi Medical University in Japan were included in this study. Corneal topography, pachymetry, and elevation images were obtained using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual feld tests were collected using standard automated perimetry with 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. The association between corneal structural parameters and visual feld damage was investigated using machine learning and evaluated through tenfold cross-validation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The average mean deviation was − 8.0 dB and the average central corneal thickness (CCT) was 513.1 µm. Using ensemble machine learning bagged trees classifers, we detected visual feld abnormality from corneal parameters with an AUC of 0.83. Using a tree-based machine learning classifer, we detected four visual feld severity levels from corneal parameters with an AUC of 0.74. Although CCT and corneal hysteresis have long been accepted as predictors of glaucoma development and future visual feld loss, corneal shape and elevation parameters may also predict glaucoma-induced visual functional loss. While intraocular pressure (IOP), age, disc hemorrhage, and optic cup characteristics have been long identifed as classic risk factors for development of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG)1,2, the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) suggested central corneal thickness (CCT) as a new risk factor for development of POAG3.
  • Floaters-Survey-Ophthalmol-2016.Pdf

    Floaters-Survey-Ophthalmol-2016.Pdf

    survey of ophthalmology 61 (2016) 211e227 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/survophthal Major review Vitreous floaters: Etiology, diagnostics, and management Rebecca Milston, MOptoma, Michele C. Madigan, PhDb,c, J. Sebag, MD, FACS, FRCOphth, FARVOd,* a Centre for Eye Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia b School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia c Save Sight Institute and Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia d VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, USA article info abstract Article history: Vitreous is a hydrated extracellular matrix comprised primarily of water, collagens, and Received 3 July 2015 hyaluronan organized into a homogeneously transparent gel. Gel liquefaction results from Received in revised form 25 molecular alterations with dissociation of collagen from hyaluronan and aggregation of November 2015 collagen fibrils forming fibers that cause light scattering and hence symptomatic floaters, Accepted 25 November 2015 especially in myopia. With aging, gel liquefaction and weakened vitreoretinal adhesion Available online 8 December 2015 result in posterior vitreous detachment, the most common cause of primary symptomatic floaters arising from the dense collagen matrix of the posterior vitreous cortex. Recent Keywords: studies indicate that symptomatic floaters are not only more prevalent, but also have a vitreous negative impact on the quality of life that is greater than previously appreciated. We review collagen the literature concerning management of symptomatic vitreous floaters, currently either myopia with observation, vitrectomy, or Nd:YAG laser.
  • VISUAL FIELD Pathway Extends from the „Front‟ to the „Back‟ of the RETINA Brain

    VISUAL FIELD Pathway Extends from the „Front‟ to the „Back‟ of the RETINA Brain

    NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. Visual Pathway Disorders Amr Hassan, MD, FEBN Associate professor of Neurology - Cairo University Optic nerve • Anatomy of visual pathway • How to examine • Visual pathway disorders • Quiz 2 Optic nerve • Anatomy of visual pathway • How to examine • Visual pathway disorders • Quiz 3 Optic nerve The Visual Pathway VISUAL FIELD Pathway extends from the „front‟ to the „back‟ of the RETINA brain. ON OC OT LGN OPTIC RADIATIONS ON = Optic Nerve OC = Optic Chiasm OT = Optic Tract LGN = Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Thalamus VISUAL CORTEX 5 The Visual Pathway Eyes & Retina Light >> lens >> retina (inverted and reversed image). Eyes & Retina Eyes & Retina • Macula: oval region approximately 3-5 mm that surrounds the fovea, also has high visual acuity. • Fovea: central fixation point of each eye// region of the retina with highest visual acuity. Eyes & Retina • Optic disc: region where axons leaving the retina gather to form the Optic nerve. Eyes & Retina • Blind spot located 15° lateral and inferior to central fixation point of each eye. Object to be seen Peripheral Retina Central Retina (fovea in the macula lutea) 12 Photoreceptors © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Photoreceptors Cones • Cone-shaped • Less sensitive • Operate in high light • Color vision • Less numerous • Highly represented in the fovea >> have high spatial & temporal resolution >> they detect colors. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Photoreceptors Rods • Rod-shaped • Highly sensitive • Operate at night • Gray-scale vision • More numerous than cons- 20:1, have poor spatial & temporal resolution of visual stimuli, do not detect colors >> vision in low level lighting conditions © Stephen E.
  • Visual Impairment Care Needs of the Public Through Clinical Care, Research, and Education, All of Which Enhance the Quality of Life

    Visual Impairment Care Needs of the Public Through Clinical Care, Research, and Education, All of Which Enhance the Quality of Life

    OPTOMETRY: OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE Doctors of optometry (ODs) are the primary health care professionals for the eye. Optometrists examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases, injuries, and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as identify related systemic conditions affecting the eye. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. Approximately 37,000 full-time equivalent doctors of optometry practice in more than 7,0000 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care provider in more than 4,300 communities. Care of the Patient with The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye Visual Impairment care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. (Low Vision Rehabilitation) OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT (LOW VISION REHABILITATION) Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Low Vision Kathleen Fraser Freeman, O.D., Principal Author Roy Gordon Cole, O.D. Eleanor E. Faye, M.D. Paul B. Freeman, O.D. Gregory L. Goodrich, Ph.D. Joan A. Stelmack, O.D. Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A. Heath, O.D., Chair John F. Amos, O.D., M.S. Stephen C. Miller, O.D.
  • Classification of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study

    Classification of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study

    CLINICAL SCIENCES Classification of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study John L. Keltner, MD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD; Kimberly E. Cello, BSc; Mary A. Edwards, BSc; Shannan E. Bandermann, MA; Michael A. Kass, MD; Mae O. Gordon, PhD; for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Objectives: (1) To develop a classification system for Main Outcome Measures: A 97% interreader hemi- visual field (VF) abnormalities, (2) to determine inter- field agreement. reader and test-retest agreement, and (3) to determine the frequency of various VF defects in the Ocular Hy- Results: The average hemifield classification agree- pertension Treatment Study. ment (between any 2 of 3 readers) for 5018 hemifields was 97% and 88% for the 1266 abnormal VFs that were Methods: Follow-up VFs are performed every 6 months reread (agreement between the first and second and are monitored for abnormality, indicated by a glau- classifications). Glaucomatous patterns of loss (partial coma hemifield test result or a corrected pattern SD arcuate, paracentral, and nasal step defects) composed outside the normal limits. As of January 1, 2002, 1636 the majority of VF defects. patients had 2509 abnormal VFs. Three readers inde- pendently classified each hemifield using a classifica- Conclusion: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment tion system developed at the VF reading center. A Study classification system has high reproducibility and subset (50%) of the abnormal VFs was reread to evalu- provides a possible nomenclature for characterizing VF ate test-retest reader agreement. A mean deviation was defects. calculated separately for the hemifields as an index to the severity of VF loss.