Molecular Cytogenetic Evolution of Mammals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Cytogenetic Evolution of Mammals European Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 21, 1330 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/13 www.nature.com/ejhg rapid chromosome evolution in canids, BOOK REVIEW skunks, pigs, and equids. The molecular cytogenetic method com- Molecular cytogenetic evolution of monly used is chromosome painting. Few species, mostly primates, have been studied with higher resolution methods such as BAC- mammals FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization using .............................................. BAC), which are able to define intrachromo- Chromosomal evolution somal rearrangements and inversions. There is much work to be done at this level. Evolutionary Dynamics of Mammalian Karyotypes. However, chromosome painting has allowed Edited by R Stanyon and A Graphodatsky a large sampling of taxa, whereas sequencing ISSN: 1424-8581 studies have been performed mainly in Published by: Karger, Basel, Switzerland, as Reprint of Cytogenetic and Genome species of economic interest or in species Research, Vol. 137, No. 2–4, 2012, 207 pp. Price CHF: 109, h91, $128 that are of peculiar significance for under- ................. standing human evolution such as the higher Claude Stoll primates. Nonetheless, with the next-genera- tion sequencing, the number of vertebrate .................................................................................... species sequenced will highly increase. It is probable that the integration of cytogenetic European Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 21, 1330; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.4 and sequencing information will be extre- mely important for resolving issues in cyto- genetics such as the reconstruction of his volume reviews and synthesizes the range and do not correlate with the com- ancestral karyotypes, the elimination of Tcytogenetic results obtained in the plexity of the organisms (the C-value para- homoplasy that can plague cytogenetic numerous studies of mammalian chromo- dox). The biology of transposable elements reconstructions, and the distinction of con- some evolution including the recent advances may explain some of the molecular mechan- vergent associations and homologous in molecular cytogenetics. isms that are involved in genome size varia- associations. The study of animal karyotypes showed tion and novelties. Those searching for an answer to the that animals have a great diversity in number The other 13 contributions of the volume, question what makes us human, will not find and morphology of chromosomes despite written by leading experts in the field, details it in this volume. However, one can imagine that their genomes are remarkably conserved. the cytogenetic findings in Marsupialia and that understanding the forces responsible for How can this conservation be resolved? This Monotreme, Xenarthra, Afrotheria, Eulipo- different rates of chromosome evolution and volume try to answer to this question. typhla, Chiroptera, Carnivora and Pholidota, the peculiar characteristics of the mammalian The first contribution of the volume, Cetartiodactyla, Perissodactyla, Sciuromorpha genome will be possible at the sequencing written by the Editors with a bringing of and Lagomorpha, Non-Sciuromorpha Roden- level in the near future. Will this mean that MA Ferguson-Smith, is an overview and a tia, Strepsirrhine Primates, Dermoptera and cytogenetics is no more relevant in evolu- history of the cytogenetic techniques used in Scandentia, new-world monkeys (Platyrrhini), tionary studies? The Editors of this volume the analysis of mammalian karyotypes includ- and Catarrhine Primates (old-world monkeys, do not think so, they think that a closer ing the results obtained, with an emphasis on apes and humans). integration between cytogenetics and sequen- chromosome painting in mammals. Chromo- In this volume, a consistent view of cing efforts will be necessary if cytogeneticists some banding (Q-, G-, R-, and C-banding) chromosome evolution in mammals is pro- want to maintain their relevance in evolu- allowed the workers looking for between- posed. However, more work is needed as tionary studies. species homologies. However, the homologies there is an insufficiency of taxa sampling. This book, available in hardback and in established between distantly related species Even in the more studied mammalian orders, electronic format, is recommended to those remained speculative until the advent of primates and carnivores, only a few species interested in the evolution of the vertebrate molecular cytogenetics and especially chro- have been studied. The study of more species genome and for researchers involved in mosome painting in the late 1980s and early for enormous orders such as rodents and bats mammalian evolution, comparative cytoge- 1990s. Then it became possible to search for should be done as well for other species all netics, molecular cytogenetics, comparative ancestral karyotypes, and to offer original over the mammalian tree, including smaller genomics, primatology, and zoology’ perspectives on genome evolution in mam- clades such as Afrotheria and Xenarthra. mals and in other vertebrates, as well as on Painting comparisons of humans and other syntenic and associational evolution. primates displayed that there is no molecular The second contribution is devoted to clock for chromosome evolution. Different C Stoll is at the Laboratoire de Ge´ne´tique genome size as the evolution of the main rates of chromosome evolution were Me´dicale, Faculte´ de Me´decine, University of genome signature is its size. However, the reported, for example, the high chromosome Strasbourg, France genome size of several taxa vary over a broad conservation in felids and whales, and the E-mail: [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • The Mesozoic Era Alvarez, W.(1997)
    Alles Introductory Biology: Illustrated Lecture Presentations Instructor David L. Alles Western Washington University ----------------------- Part Three: The Integration of Biological Knowledge Vertebrate Evolution in the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic Eras ----------------------- Vertebrate Evolution in the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic • Amphibians to Reptiles Internal Fertilization, the Amniotic Egg, and a Water-Tight Skin • The Adaptive Radiation of Reptiles from Scales to Hair and Feathers • Therapsids to Mammals • Dinosaurs to Birds Ectothermy to Endothermy The Evolution of Reptiles The Phanerozoic Eon 444 365 251 Paleozoic Era 542 m.y.a. 488 416 360 299 Camb. Ordov. Sil. Devo. Carbon. Perm. Cambrian Pikaia Fish Fish First First Explosion w/o jaws w/ jaws Amphibians Reptiles 210 65 Mesozoic Era 251 200 180 150 145 Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous First First First T. rex Dinosaurs Mammals Birds Cenozoic Era Last Ice Age 65 56 34 23 5 1.8 0.01 Paleo. Eocene Oligo. Miocene Plio. Ple. Present Early Primate First New First First Modern Cantius World Monkeys Apes Hominins Humans A modern Amphibian—the toad A modern day Reptile—a skink, note the finely outlined scales. A Comparison of Amphibian and Reptile Reproduction The oldest known reptile is Hylonomus lyelli dating to ~ 320 m.y.a.. The earliest or stem reptiles radiated into therapsids leading to mammals, and archosaurs leading to all the other reptile groups including the thecodontians, ancestors of the dinosaurs. Dimetrodon, a Mammal-like Reptile of the Early Permian Dicynodonts were a group of therapsids of the late Permian. Web Reference http://www.museums.org.za/sam/resource/palaeo/cluver/index.html Therapsids experienced an adaptive radiation during the Permian, but suffered heavy extinctions during the end Permian mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mammals Classifying Mammals
    Outline 20: Evolution of Mammals Classifying Mammals • Paleontologists recognize at least 5 major groups of mammals. Only 3 are still living: –Monotremes: lay eggs –Marsupials: poorly developed at birth –Eutherians or Placentals: well developed at birth 5 Major Groups: 3 Living Defining Mammals • Warm blooded • Fur • Milk glands • Can lay eggs or have some form of live birth. Recognizing Fossil Mammals • Our definition of mammals doesn’t work with fossil bones. • How do we recognize the first mammals? –Reptiles have 3 bones in lower jaw. –Mammals have 1 bone in lower jaw –Mammal teeth are specialized. Dinosaurs have 3 bones in lower jaw 2 3 1 Mammals have 1 bone in lower jaw Hadrocodium, a lower Jurassic mammal with a “large” brain (6 mm brain case in an 8 mm skull) Eomaia, oldest placental mammal, 125 my old, Lower Cretaceous, China Eomaia, oldest placental mammal, 125 my old, Lower Cretaceous, China Eomaia Mammal fossil from the Cretaceous of Mongolia Jaw bones • Reptiles have 3 bones in their jaw: dentary, articular, and quadrate. • Articular and quadrate bones of reptile jaw became the hammer and anvil bones of the mammalian inner ear. • Marsupials are born with a reptilian jaw, which quickly changes before they eat solid food. = articular of = quadrate of Human Ear Bones, or lower reptile upper reptile Auditory Ossicles jaw jaw Cochlea Mammal Teeth • Teeth make excellent fossils. • Reptile ancestors had simple, cone- shaped teeth they regularly replaced. • Mammal teeth are specialized into incisors, canines, pre-molars and molars. • Mammals have only two sets of teeth during their lifetime. A Nile crocodile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mammalian Aging
    Experimental Gerontology 37 &2002) 769±775 www.elsevier.com/locate/expgero The evolution of mammalian aging JoaÄo Pedro de MagalhaÄes*, Olivier Toussaint Department of Biology, Unit of Cellular Biochemistry and Biology, University of Namur FUNDP), Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium Received 18 December 2001; received in revised form 15 January 2002; accepted 18 January 2002 Abstract The incidence of aging is different between mammals and their closer ancestors &e.g. reptiles and amphibians). While all studied mammals express a well-de®ned aging phenotype, many amphibians and reptiles fail to show signs of aging. In addition, mammalian species show great similarities in their aging phenotype, suggesting that a common origin might be at work. The proposed hypothesis is that mammalian aging evolved together with the ancestry of modern mammals. In turn, this suggests that the fundamental cause of human aging is common to most, if not all, mammals and might be a unique phenom- enon. Experimental procedures capable of testing these theories and how to map the causes of mammalian and thus, human aging, are predicted. q 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Aging; Senescence; Evolution; Mammals; Reptiles; Birds; Longevity 1. Introduction life span to Marion's tortoise capable of living over a century in captivity. Studies conducted in frogs failed Aging affects all studied mammalian species: from to indicate any increase in mortality both in the wild mice living no more than a mere half-a-dozen years to &Plytycz et al., 1995) and in captivity &Brocas and humans capable of living over 120years &Comfort, VerzaÁr, 1961).
    [Show full text]
  • Here Come the (Bigger) Mammals
    HHMI Tangled Bank Studios December 7, 2019 Here Come the (Bigger) Mammals December 7, 2019 Here Come the (Bigger) Mammals About this Guide This Guide, based on the Science News article “Here come the (bigger) mammals,” asks students to analyze a graph about a recent fossil find, discuss how organisms evolve as ecosystems change and research important fossil sites across the world. This Guide includes: Article-based Comprehension Q&A — These questions, based on the Science News article “Here come the (bigger) mammals,” Readability: 9.8, ask students to analyze what a recent fossil discovery tells scientists about the recovery of mammals after an asteroid struck Earth. Related standards include NGSS- DCI: HS-LS2; HS-LS4; HS-ESS2. Student Comprehension Worksheet — These questions are formatted so it’s easy to print them out as a worksheet. Cross-curricular Discussion Q&A — Students will explore the immediate and long-term effects of specific environmental disturbances, including how energy enters or leaves an ecosystem, how the biotic and abiotic characteristics of the ecosystem change and how organisms evolve under the new conditions. Related standards include NGSS-DCI: HS-LS2; HS-LS4; HS-PS3; HS-ESS2. Student Discussion Worksheet — These questions are formatted so it’s easy to print them out as a worksheet. Activity: Stories in Rock Summary: In this activity, students will research important fossil sites across the world and synthesize what they find into a story to present to the class. Related standards include NGSS-DCI: HS-LS2; HS-LS4; HS-ESS2. Approximate class time: 2 class periods to complete the discussion, research and reporting and to debrief as a class.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence in Multispecies Interactions
    Review Convergence in Multispecies Interactions 1,2, 1,2 Leonora S. Bittleston, * Naomi E. Pierce, 1,3 4 Aaron M. Ellison, and Anne Pringle The concepts of convergent evolution and community convergence highlight Trends how selective pressures can shape unrelated organisms or communities in We present a framework for exploring similar ways. We propose a related concept, convergent interactions, to how selection shapes multispecies associations. describe the independent evolution of multispecies interactions with similar physiological or ecological functions. A focus on convergent interactions clari- We provide examples of functional fi es how natural selection repeatedly favors particular kinds of associations convergence in species interactions. among species. Characterizing convergent interactions in a comparative con- Convergent interactions can be used text is likely to facilitate prediction of the ecological roles of organisms (including to predict the ecology of unknown microbes) in multispecies interactions and selective pressures acting in poorly symbioses. understood or newly discovered multispecies systems. We illustrate the con- Convergent interactions can help elu- cept of convergent interactions with examples: vertebrates and their gut bac- cidate the ecological roles of microbes. teria; ectomycorrhizae; insect–fungal–bacterial interactions; pitcher-plant food webs; and ants and ant–plants. Convergence in Evolution and Ecology The word convergence typically describes convergent evolution, the independent evolution of similar traits in different lineages resulting from strong selective pressures: ‘[a]nimals, belonging to two most distinct lines of descent, may readily become adapted to similar conditions, and thus assume a close external resemblance’ [1]. Although convergent evolution is primarily a descrip- tor of morphological features of animals and plants, it can be used to describe microbes and physiological processes as well (e.g., convergent evolution of transcriptional regulation of gene circuits in bacteria and fungi; see [2]).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Evolution Underground. the Ecological-Genetic-Phenetic Interfaces
    Acta Theriologica, Suppl. 3: 9-31, 1995. PL ISSN 0001-7051 Mammalian evolution underground. The ecological-genetic-phenetic interfaces Eviatar NEVO Nevo E. 1995. Mammalian evolution underground. The ecological-genetic-phenetic interfaces. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals II. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta Theriologica, Suppl. 3: 9-31. The global adaptive convergence of subterranean mammals currently involves 3 orders: rodents, insectivores and marsupials. These include 11 families, 50 genera, and several hundreds of species. This global evolutionary process followed the stepwise climatic cooling and drought followed by biotic extinction in the transition from the middle Eocene to the early Oligocene, a period of 10 million years (35-45 Ma = million years ago) of profound change in earth geology, climate and biota. The earth changed from the Mesozoic "hot house" to the Neogene (Miocene to Present) "cold house", ie from a warm, equable, mostly subtropical world that persisted from the Mesozoic to the beginning of the present glaciated world. The ecological theater of open country biotas, that opened up progressively in the Cenozoic following the Eocene-Oligocene transition, was associated with increasing aridity, colder climate, and terrestrialism. This climatic change set the stage for a rapid evolutionary play of recurrent adaptive radiations of unrelated mammals on all continents into the subterranean ecotope. The subterranean ecotope is relatively simple, stable, specialised, low or medium in productivity, predictable and discontinuous. Its major evolutionary determinants are specialization, competition and isolation. This ecotope involves the herbivorous (ro- dents) and insectivorous (insectivores and marsupials) niches. All subterranean mam- mals share molecular and organismal convergent adaptations to their common unique ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Origin and Evolution of Dim-Light Vision in Mammals
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282941769 The molecular origin and evolution of dim-light vision in mammals ARTICLE in EVOLUTION · OCTOBER 2015 Impact Factor: 4.61 · DOI: 10.1111/evo.12794 READS 155 8 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Constanze Bickelmann Ilke Van Hazel Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute fo… University of Toronto 17 PUBLICATIONS 76 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 22 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Johannes Müller Belinda S W Chang Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute fo… University of Toronto 84 PUBLICATIONS 1,278 CITATIONS 59 PUBLICATIONS 1,257 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Johannes Müller Retrieved on: 17 January 2016 BRIEF COMMUNICATION doi:10.1111/evo.12794 The molecular origin and evolution of dim-light vision in mammals Constanze Bickelmann,1,2 James M. Morrow,3,4 Jing Du,4 Ryan K. Schott,4 Ilke van Hazel,4 Steve Lim,3 Johannes Muller,¨ 1 and Belinda S. W. Chang3,4,5,6 1Museum fur¨ Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut fur¨ Evolutions- und Biodiversitatsforschung,¨ 10115 Berlin, Germany 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada 5Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada 6E-mail: [email protected] Received June 1, 2015 Accepted September 27, 2015 The nocturnal origin of mammals is a longstanding hypothesis that is considered instrumental for the evolution of endothermy, apotentialkeyinnovationinthissuccessfulclade.Thishypothesisisprimarilybasedonindirectanatomicalinferencefrom fossils. Here, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of rhodopsin—the vertebrate visual pigment mediating the first step in phototransduction at low-light levels—via codon-based model tests for selection, combined with gene resurrection methods that allow for the study of ancient proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Mammals
    Proceedings: 9th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 1969 Fire and Mammals CHARLES O. HANDLEY, JR. Division of Mammals, Smithsonian Institution IN THE definition of ecological factors important to mammals fire usually has not been ranked with temperature, moisture, or light, or even with soil, shelter, or seasonality. However, fire and fire perpetuated environments, such as grasslands, have been of the utmost importance in the evolution of mammals, and directly or indirectly are a significant force in the lives of a large segment of today's mammals. The first mammals very likely were insect eaters, but early in the history of mammals pastoral forms (specialized for feeding on vege­ tation) began to develop. First there were browsers; later grazers. The coniferous forests that dominated the scene at the da\vn of the era of mammals gave way to evolving broad-leaved deciduous hard­ wood forests while the major mammalian groups radiated in the early Cenozoic. The early browsing mammals were contemporaneous with the broad-leaved hardwoods. It was not until the middle of the Cenozoic, in late Oligocene or early l\1iocene, that grazing mammals began to flourish. Apparently grasses became an important floral element at about the same time. It appears that the evolution of grasses and grasslands and the evolution of grazing mammals 'were intimately related. Komarek (1965: 195-196) has pointed out that: "Natural grass­ lands consist of a great variety of grasses and forbs so that the prairies, plains, or steppes are not uniform in their ability to carry fire under the same conditions. Then, too, many of the animals that 151 Proceedings: 9th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 1969 CHARLES O.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Mammals Including Humans
    Order Of Mammals Including Humans Cesar bludgeons gingerly while permitted Sinclare misaim haplessly or sculpture sunward. Socialized braggingTaylor never her chyackcinques so steadies bluely orwhile allot Bertie any administratorship methodised some unadvisedly. unbendingness Follow-up sloppily. and polyacid Glenn To include sea lions, including on behalf if you can be careful observation. They take care for bacteria distribute, be murdered by crown group you enjoy this is home near eyes are then we love being expressed in north. The order include phylum known as needed if exist? The order include tiger pool covers all. The ailment to all placental mammals was a few insect-eating with that. At sea otter pelt, including this situation is because it if a human sexuality is one clear reason that produce traits that are particularly on. What our study of a membrane progestin receptor. Transmission of Avian Influenza A Viruses Between Animals. Only while haplorhines ie tarsiers monkeys apes and humans also observe a. In order include lions, including humans get their emotions as a place. Us tomorrow for food or fur or two. Are Chickens Dinosaurs About Chickens Chickens Guide. What do you call either female cow? An animal orders of treatment of california: a vertebrate tissues were discovered organisms, behavior as they propel themselves. The eggs rather than just something else do. The supreme of human evolution is covered here Human Evolution material. Medical and other scientific research because humans are mammals other mammals. Order Examples Major Characteristics Rodentia beavers one that of chisel-like front. Mammals National Wildlife Federation. It can communicate by no mammals, chief of animal orders that possess a dangerous situations where should be.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 43 Mammals.Pdf
    May 03, 2012 43 Mammals Section 1 Origin and Evolution of Mammals Section 2 Characteristics of Mammals Section 3 Diversity of Mammals Section 4 Primates and Human Origins 43-1 Origin and Evolution of Mammals Objectives: Describe the major characteristics of mammals. Compare the characteristics of early synapsids, early therapsids, and modern mammals. Relate the adaptive radiation of mammals to the history of dinosaurs. Differentiate between monotremes, marsupials, and placental mammals. Major Characteristics All mammals have the following six major characteristics: · Endothermy · Hair · Completely divided heart · Milk · Milk is produced by mammary glands. · Single jawbone · Specialized teeth Characteristics of Mammals May 03, 2012 Hair Diverse and specialized teeth Endothermic metabolism Mammary glands that produce milk Mammary Glands Ancestors of Mammals Around 300 million years ago, amniotes diverged into two groups. One group gave rise to dinosaurs, birds, and modern reptiles. The other group, synapsids, gave rise to mammals and their extinct relatives. The first synapsids were small and looked like modern lizards. By the Permian period, various large synapsids had appeared. Unlike most other reptiles, which have uniformly shaped teeth, these early synapsids had specialized Synapsids teeth. Ancestors of Mammals Continued Therapsids A subset of synapsids, called therapsids, gave rise to mammals. Therapsids appeared late in the Permian period and lived into the Jurassic period. A rich fossil record of transitional forms between therapsids and mammals exists. Several features we associate with mammals evolved first among early therapsids. Therapsids May 03, 2012 Ancestors of Mammals Continued Early Mammals Mammals and dinosaurs appeared during the Triassic period and coexisted for more than 150 million years.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Phylogenetic History: the Evolution of Marine Mammals
    Case Studies in Ecology and Evolution DRAFT 11 Phylogenetic History: The Evolution of Marine Mammals Think for a moment about marine mammals: seals, walruses, dugongs and whales. Seals and walruses are primarily cold-water species that eat mostly fish and can spend part of their time on land (or ice). Dugongs and manatees are tropical herbivores and are entirely aquatic. Toothed whales and baleen whales are also entirely aquatic. All of these species share many similarities such as streamlined bodies and flippers. But they are all clearly mammals: they have fur, bear live young, lactate, and their skeletons match many features of terrestrial mammals. Figure 1. Harbor seal, walrus, dugong, and right whale) The first mammals were certainly terrestrial. There is good evidence that mammals evolved from reptile-like ancestor. Therefore at some point there was a transition from terrestrial environment to an aquatic lifestyle in this group of species. How did that occur? Charles Darwin spent a lot of time thinking about such evolutionary transitions. He argued that whales evolved from terrestrial ancestors and re-developed the streamlined bodies as an adaptation to their aquatic lifestyle. Here is a passage from the first edition of the Origin of Species, chapter 6: “I will now give two or three instances of diversified and of changed habits in the individuals of the same species. When either case occurs, it would be easy for natural selection to fit the animal, by some modification of its structure, for its changed habits, or exclusively for one of its several different habits. …. In North America the black bear was seen by Hearne swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Size Evolution Across the Geozoic
    EA44CH20-Smith ARI 4 May 2016 14:25 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Body Size Evolution Across the Geozoic 1, 2 2 Felisa A. Smith, ∗ Jonathan L. Payne, Noel A. Heim, Meghan A. Balk,1 Seth Finnegan,3 MichałKowalewski,4 S. Kathleen Lyons,5 Craig R. McClain,6 Daniel W. McShea,7 Philip M. Novack-Gottshall,8 Paula Spaeth Anich,9 and Steve C. Wang10 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; email: [email protected] 2Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 3Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 4Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 5Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 6National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705 7Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 8Department of Biological Sciences, Benedictine University, Lisle, Illinois 60532 9Department of Biology and Natural Resources, Northland College, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806 10Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 19081 Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2016. 44:523–53 Keywords The Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences is allometry, biovolume, maximum body size, macroevolution, geobiology online at earth.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012147 The Geozoic encompasses the 3.6 Ga interval in Earth history when life has Copyright c 2016 by Annual Reviews. ⃝ existed. Over this time, life has diversified from exclusively tiny, single-celled All rights reserved organisms to include large, complex multicellular forms.
    [Show full text]