(1981) International System of Units and Its Particular Application to Soil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(1981) International System of Units and Its Particular Application to Soil The international system of units and its particular application to soil chemistry1 S. J. Thien and J. D. Oster2 ABSTRACT sentiality of adopting SI in its journals. Using SI in ASA journals would aid communication among scientists The International System of Units (SI) brings uni- within agronomic disciplines as well as among these and form style and terminology to world-wide com- other disciplines, especially internationally and in the munication of measurements. Because the Ameri- pure sciences. Scientists will find that SI does not differ can Society of Agronomy (ASA), Crop Science So- ciety of America (CSSA) and Soil Science Society greatly from the metric system now used, and it in- of America (SSSA) are international, they should creases understanding of the units the authors use. adopt SI in their communications. This paper sum- The General Conference on Weights and Measures marizes SI units, definitions, symbols, and rules of (CGPM) adopted the International System of Units in usage. Discussions of applying SI to agronomic 1960. The International Bureau of Weights and Meas- parameters are included where new concepts are ures (BIPM) and, in the USA, the National Bureau of introduced. Tables of recommended units and Standards (NBS) published rules on its use (2). SI guide- conversion factors are presented so use of SI can lines, besides being used in many foreign countries and begin immediately. It is proposed that a 2 to 3-year international societies, are followed by several Ameri- adaptation period begin with this printing, with authors beginning to use SI and including tradi- can societies and college textbooks (1). ASA members tional units, as desired, in parenthesis. are not expected to adopt this new system immediately. Rather, the ASA SI Units committee (ACS 321.4) Additional index words: Metric, Conversion table, recommends adoption over 2 to 3 years after these Publication style, Measurement. guidelines are published. During the interim, it is strongly recommended that authors begin now to use SI 'Contribution No. 81-483-j from the Agronomy Dep., Kansas E Systeme International d'Unites (SI) is being Agric. Exp. Stn., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506 and the U.S. Salinity Laboratory, AR-SEA, USDA, 4500 Glenwood Drive, L adopted aiound the world. Its purpose is to bring Riverside, CA 92501. Current address of the junior author is Dep. of uniformity of style and terminology in communicating Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA measurements. The world-wide impact of American 92521. Society of Agronomy (ASA) dictates the logic and es- 2 Research soil scientist, and soil and water specialist, respectively. SI UNITS IN SOIL CHEMISTRY 63 Table I. BaseSI Units (2) Table 4. Examplesof SI derived units expressed by meansof special names(2) Quantity Unit Symbol Length meter m Expression Mass kilogram kg in terms of Time second s Quantity Name Symbol SI base units Electric current ampere A Dynamicviscosity pascal second Paos m-~okgos-~ Thermodynamic temperature kelvin K Momentof force newton meter N.m m~.kg.s-2 Amount-of-substance mole mol Surface tension newton per meter N/m kg.s-~ Luminousintensity candela cd Power density, heat flux density, watt per square ~ -3 Table 2. Examplesof SI derived units expressed irradiance meter W/m kg.s Heat capacity, entropy joule per kelvin J/K m2.kg.s-2.K-~ in termsof baseunits (2) Specific heat capacity, joule per kilogram specific entropy kelvin J/(kg.K) m~.s-~.K-t SI Unit Specific energy joule per kilogram J/kg m2.s-~ Thermal conductivity " watt per meter kelvin W/(m.K) m.kg.s-3.K-’ Quantity Name Symbol e Energy density joule per cubic meter j/m m-~.kg.s-2 °’ Area square meter m~ Electric field strength volt per meter V/m m.kg.s-3.A Electric charge density coulombper cubic Volume cubic meter m ~ Speed, velocity meter per second m/s meter C/m m-~.s.A meter per second squared 2 Electric flux density coulomb per square Acceleration m/s 2 Wave number 1 per meter meter C/m m-~.s.A -3. -~. ~ Density, mass density kilogram per cubic meter ~ Permittivity farad per meter F/m m kg s’- A kg/m -’ Current density ampere per square meter A/m2 Molar energy joule per mole J/mol m~.kg.s-2.mol Molar entropy, molar Magnetic field strength ampere per meter A/m * Concentration heat capacity joule per mole kelvin J/(mol.K) m~.kg.s-~.K-’.moF (of amount of substance) mole per cubic meter mol/m’ Exposure (x and coulomb per 3,rays) kilogram C/kg kg-~,s.A Specific volume cubic meter per kilogram m~Jkg -~ Luminance candela per square meter cd/m2 Absorbed dose rate gray per second Gy/s m2*s Table 5. SupplementarySI Units (2) Table 3. SI derived units with special names(2) Quantity Unit Symbol SI unit Plane angle radian rad Expression Expression Solid angle steradian sr in terms in terms Sym- of other of Sl base Quantity Name bol units units Frequency hertz Hz s-t Sl UNITS -2 Force newton N m.kg.s ~ -~ Pressure, stress pascal Pa N/m m-’. kg ¯ s SI units are divided into three classes: base units, de- Energy, work, quantity of heat joule J N.m m2.kg.s-~. Power, radiant, flux watt W J/s m~.kg.s-3 rived units and supplementary units. Quantity of electricity, Base units are seven, well-defined units which by con- electric charge coulomb C A.s s.A vention are regarded as dimensionally independent: the Electric potential, potential difference, electromotive meter, the kilogram, the second, the ampere, the kelvin, force volt V W/A m2.kg.s-3.A-’ ~ the mole, and the candela (Table 1). Note that lower Capacitance farad F C/V m-~.kg-t.s’.A case is used for unit symbols except where the symbol is Electric resistance ohm i~ V/A m2.kg.s-~.A-~ Conductance siemens S A/V m-2.kg-~.s~.A~ derived from a proper name, then a capital is used (un- Celsius temperature degree abbreviated units are not capitalized). Symbols do not celsius °C K Luminous flux lumen lm cd. sr~" change in the plural and are not followed by a period. Illuminance lux Ix lm/m~ m-~.cd.sr~" Derived units are expressed in algebraic terms of base Activity (of a radionuclide) becquerel Bq s-’ units (Table 2). Some have been given special names and Absorbed dose, specific energy imparted, kerma, absorbed symbols (Table 3), which may be used to express other dose index gray Gy J/kg-~ m~.s derived units (Table 4). ~" In this expressionthe steradian (st) is treated as a base unit. Supplementary units are those not yet classified as either base units or derived units. This class now con- and include traditional units, as desired, in parentheses. tains onIy two units, radian and steradian (Table 5). Each scientific discipline presents unique circum- Punctuation of Derived Units. The product of two or stances regarding unit expressions. Hence, there may more units is preferably indicated by a dot midway in appear cases in crop or soil sciences where strict use of relation to symbol height. The dot may be dispensed SI appears unsuitable. This paper addresses some of with when there is no risk of confusion with another those considerations and the committee intends to symbol, remain active to consider future problems. This paper is one of a series being prepared by mem- for example: Nom or N m bers of the SI Units committee. It first describes SI in general and then discusses its particular application to A solidus (oblique stroke, /), a horizontal line, or ASA publications and the soil science discipline with negative powers may be used to express a derived unit emphasis on soil chemistry. formed from two others by division, 64 JOURNALOF AGRONOMICEDUCATION, VOL. 10, 1981 m for example: m/s, ~-, or m.s-’. Table6. SI Prefixes(2) Multiplication factor Pref’Lx Symbol Only one solidus may be used in combinations of 1~ 000000000000000000 = 10 exa E units unless parentheses are used to avoid ambiguity, 1~’ 000000000000000= 10 peta P 1’2 000000000000 = 10 tera T 1 000000000 = 109 giga G for example: mokg/s3oA, or l~ 000000 = 10 mega M 1~ 000 = l0 kilo k mokg°s-3°A-1, 100 = 102 hecto h 10 = 10’ deka da but not, m°kg/s3/A. 0.1-I = 10 deci d 0.01-2 = 10 centi c -3 Application of SIPrefixes. The prefixes and symbols 0.001 = 10 milli m 0.00001-6 = 10 micro listed in Table 6 are used to indicate orders of magni- 0.000000001 = 10-" nano n tude of SI units. Amongthe base units, the unit of mass 0.0000001300001-1~ = 10 pico p 0.000000000000001 = 10-" femto f (kilogram) is the only one whose name, for historical -1~ 0.0130000000000000001 = 10 atto a reasons, already contains a prefix. Names of decimal multiples and sub-multiples of the unit of mass are formed by attaching prefixes to the word "gram", for Table7. Unitsin usewith S! (2) example rag, but not gkg because compound prefixes Quantity Unit Symbol Definition are not allowed. Time minute rain 1 min = 60 s Prefixes should be chosen to reduce nonsignificant hour h 1 h = 60 min = 3,600 s digits or leading zeros in decimal fractions. A prefix pre- day d 1 d = 24 h = 86,400 s ~ -J ~ ferably should be chosen so that the numerical value lies Volume liter L 1 L = 1 dm = 10 m Mass metric ton (tonne) t 1 t = 10~ kg = Mg between 0.1 and 1000 and the same unit, multiple, or Area hectare ha 1 ha = 1 hm~ =~ 10’ m submultiple should be used throughout a text, including its tables and graphs.
Recommended publications
  • 2 Amount and Concentration: Making and Diluting Solutions 2 Amount and Concentration; Making and Diluting Solutions
    Essential Maths for Medics and Vets Reference Materials Module 2. Amount and Concentration. 2 Amount and concentration: making and diluting solutions 2 Amount and concentration; making and diluting solutions.........................................................1 2A Rationale.............................................................................................................................1 2B Distinguishing between amount and concentration, g and %w/v..........................................1 2C Distinguishing between amount and concentration, moles and molar...................................2 2D Practice converting g/L to M and vice versa........................................................................3 2E Diluting Solutions ...............................................................................................................5 2F Practice calculating dilutions ...............................................................................................6 Summary of learning objectives................................................................................................7 2A Rationale Biological and biochemical investigations rely completely upon being able to detect the concentration of a variety of substances. For example, in diabetics it is important to know the concentration of glucose in the blood and you may also need to be able to calculate how much insulin would need to be dissolved in a certain volume of saline so as to give the right amount in a 1ml injection volume. It is also vitally
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Energy Storage Technologies' Application
    sustainability Review A Review of Energy Storage Technologies’ Application Potentials in Renewable Energy Sources Grid Integration Henok Ayele Behabtu 1,2,* , Maarten Messagie 1, Thierry Coosemans 1, Maitane Berecibar 1, Kinde Anlay Fante 2 , Abraham Alem Kebede 1,2 and Joeri Van Mierlo 1 1 Mobility, Logistics, and Automotive Technology Research Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (A.A.K.); [email protected] (J.V.M.) 2 Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-485659951 or +251-926434658 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: Renewable energy sources (RESs) such as wind and solar are frequently hit by fluctuations due to, for example, insufficient wind or sunshine. Energy storage technologies (ESTs) mitigate the problem by storing excess energy generated and then making it accessible on demand. While there are various EST studies, the literature remains isolated and dated. The comparison of the characteristics of ESTs and their potential applications is also short. This paper fills this gap. Using selected criteria, it identifies key ESTs and provides an updated review of the literature on ESTs and their application potential to the renewable energy sector. The critical review shows a high potential application for Li-ion batteries and most fit to mitigate the fluctuation of RESs in utility grid integration sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion Factors for SI and Non-SI Units
    Conversion Factors for SI and non-SI Units To convert Column 1 To convert Column 2 into Column 2, into Column 1, multiply by Column 1 SI Unit Column 2 non-SI Units multiply by Length 0.621 kilometer, km (103 m) mile, mi 1.609 1.094 meter, m yard, yd 0.914 3.28 meter, m foot, ft 0.304 6 1.0 micrometer, mm (10- m) micron, m 1.0 3.94 × 10-2 millimeter, mm (10-3 m) inch, in 25.4 10 nanometer, nm (10-9 m) Angstrom, Å 0.1 Area 2.47 hectare, ha acre 0.405 247 square kilometer, km2 (103 m)2 acre 4.05 × 10-3 0.386 square kilometer, km2 (103 m)2 square mile, mi2 2.590 2.47 × 10-4 square meter, m2 acre 4.05 × 103 10.76 square meter, m2 square foot, ft2 9.29 × 10-2 1.55 × 10-3 square millimeter, mm2 (10-3 m)2 square inch, in2 645 Volume 9.73 × 10-3 cubic meter, m3 acre-inch 102.8 35.3 cubic meter, m3 cubic foot, ft3 2.83 × 10-2 6.10 × 104 cubic meter, m3 cubic inch, in3 1.64 × 10-5 2.84 × 10-2 liter, L (10-3 m3) bushel, bu 35.24 1.057 liter, L (10-3 m3) quart (liquid), qt 0.946 3.53 × 10-2 liter, L (10-3 m3) cubic foot, ft3 28.3 0.265 liter, L (10-3 m3) gallon 3.78 33.78 liter, L (10-3 m3) ounce (fluid), oz 2.96 × 10-2 2.11 liter, L (10-3 m3) pint (fluid), pt 0.473 Mass 2.20 × 10-3 gram, g (10-3 kg) pound, lb 454 3.52 × 10-2 gram, g (10-3 kg) ounce (avdp), oz 28.4 2.205 kilogram, kg pound, lb 0.454 0.01 kilogram, kg quintal (metric), q 100 1.10 × 10-3 kilogram, kg ton (2000 lb), ton 907 1.102 megagram, Mg (tonne) ton (U.S.), ton 0.907 1.102 tonne, t ton (U.S.), ton 0.907 Yield and Rate 0.893 kilogram per hectare, kg ha-1 pound per acre, lb acre-1
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Business Management Fact Sheet
    FARM BUSINESS FACT SHEET INVESTMENT IN HARVEST MACHINERY September 2017 Determining the optimum level of investment in harvest machinery Key points n It is critical to understand the policy that underpins the decision-making process when considering purchasing machinery SUMMARY of farm income. High performance farm n Understanding the total cost of Harvest machinery is an essential businesses can maintain a ratio of 0.8:1 or ownership in $/ha or $/hr is crucial for part of any grain-growing business lower without compromising timeliness. effective machinery decision-making. and requires significant investment of Despite this, many farm businesses have This helps when making decisions capital. Understanding the total cost of a machinery investment ratio of 1.2:1 or about the use of contractors versus ownership, developing policy around higher. ownership decision-making and ultimately how to Take a typical example of about n When the cost of owning a new leverage the investment is a crucial part $1 million of income for every $1 million machine is cheaper in $/ha than of machinery ownership. This is also a of machinery, the difference between the existing machine then it should key driver of farm performance. running a 0.8:1 ratio and a 1.2:1 ratio ideally be changed over represents the investment of an additional n Understand the level of machinery BACKGROUND $400,000 in capital. In relative terms, investment across the business and Machinery can be a contentious subject. when considering the annual costs of identify ways to get more from your Too little or too old can lead to higher depreciation (10 per cent) and finance (5 investment repairs and maintenance bills and cause per cent), this translates into about $60,000 timeliness issues.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Turbocharging and Supercharging Options for High-Efficiency Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles
    applied sciences Article An Evaluation of Turbocharging and Supercharging Options for High-Efficiency Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles Arthur Kerviel 1,2, Apostolos Pesyridis 1,* , Ahmed Mohammed 1 and David Chalet 2 1 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Brunel University, London UB8 3PH, UK; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (A.M.) 2 Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LHEEA Lab. (ECN/CNRS), 44321 Nantes, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-189-526-7901 Received: 17 October 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 3 December 2018 Abstract: Mass-produced, off-the-shelf automotive air compressors cannot be directly used for boosting a fuel cell vehicle (FCV) application in the same way that they are used in internal combustion engines, since the requirements are different. These include a high pressure ratio, a low mass flow rate, a high efficiency requirement, and a compact size. From the established fuel cell types, the most promising for application in passenger cars or light commercial vehicle applications is the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), operating at around 80 ◦C. In this case, an electric-assisted turbocharger (E-turbocharger) and electric supercharger (single or two-stage) are more suitable than screw and scroll compressors. In order to determine which type of these boosting options is the most suitable for FCV application and assess their individual merits, a co-simulation of FCV powertrains between GT-SUITE and MATLAB/SIMULINK is realised to compare vehicle performance on the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) driving cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Ces-Collins-Pp-Ev-Conundrum
    Gabriel Collins, J.D. Baker Botts Fellow for Energy & Environmental Regulatory Affairs Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University EVs = Power-to-WeigHt Ratio of an Aircraft, Onboard Fuel of a Subcompact Car • Electric veHicles’ instant torque and higH horsepower make the higher-end editions true performance monsters. Their power-to-weigHt ratios are often on par witH turboprop aircraft and many helicopters. • The fly in the ointment comes from the fact that batteries remain heavy and relative to hydrocarbons and simply cannot store energy nearly as efficiently per unit of mass. • The power-to-weigHt/onboard energy density relationsHip of the Rivian R1T electric truck and A-29 Big, long-range Super Tucano attack aircraft is sucH that platforms “Rivianizing” the Tucano would mean making its onboard jet fuel stores retain their current energy Super Tucano (17) and Rivian R1T (14) content, but weigH more per liter than lead metal. Needless to say, the plane’s fligHt endurance and carrying capacity would fall dramatically. • This estimate assumes the A-29’s PT-6 turboprop has a thermal efficiency of about 35%--less than half the R1T’s likely capacity to convert fuel into actual propulsive energy. Please cite as: Gabriel Collins, “The EV Conundrum: High Power Density and Low Energy Density,” Baker Institute ResearcH Source: Beechcraft, Car & Driver, EIA, EV Database, GE, Global Security, Man, Nikola, Peterbuilt, Rivian, SNC, Trucks.com, USAF, US Navy Presentation, 8 January 2020, Houston, TX Gabriel Collins, J.D. Baker Botts Fellow for Energy & Environmental Regulatory Affairs Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University Electric Vehicles’ Onboard Energy Still Significantly Trails ICE Vehicles On an Efficiency-Adjusted Basis Efficiency-Adjusted Comparison • To make the energy density comparison a bit more fair, we adjust the onboard fuel based on the fact that EVs convert nearly 80% of their battery energy into tractive power at the wheels, while IC vehicles feature efficiencies closer to 20%.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI)
    NAT'L INST. OF STAND & TECH NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST Special Publication 330 2001 Edition The International System of Units (SI) 4. Barry N. Taylor, Editor r A o o L57 330 2oOI rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Introduction on Metrology and Traceability
    A general introduction on metrology and traceability Paul Brewer LNG metrology workshop 15th June 2016 National Physical Laboratory • Develop and disseminate UK’s measurement standards, ensure international acceptance • Knowledge transfer and advice between industry, government and academia • Support Industry, trade, regulation, legislation, quality of life, science and innovation industrial environment energy Gas and Particle particles Metrology The Fundamentals of Metrology • What is metrology and what is it for? • What is an NMI and what is it for? • What is the mole and what is it for? What is ‘Metrology’? . Metrology is “the science of measurement, embracing both experimental and theoretical determinations at any level of uncertainty in any field of science and technology.” . Almost all of science and industry involves making and interpreting measurement – why is metrology special? The Proclamation Regarding Weights and Measures, 1556 by Ford Madox Brown (1889) The electrochemical characteristics of platinum phthalocyanine . Quantitative conclusions inferred; but what was the accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility and uncertainty of these measurements? . Would this have affected the conclusions? Metrology’s main activities . The definition of internationally accepted units of measurement, e.g. the kilogram . The realisation of units of measurement by scientific methods . The establishment of (metrological) traceability chains by disseminating and documenting the value and accuracy of a measurement . Traceability implies the calculation of an associated measurement uncertainty . These activities may be fundamental (scientific) or applied (practical, industrial, legal) International vocabulary of metrology The Results of Metrology . Generates systems and frameworks for quantification and through these underpins consistency and assurance in all measurement . Gives a quantified level of confidence in the measurement through an uncertainty statement .
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion Factors
    Conversion Factors Conversion factors are ratios of one object to another object. A ratio is a way of comparing two quantities. The quantities can be compared in three different ways: a to b, a:b, or a/b. At the local grocery store, a case of soda contains 24 cans. We can express the ratio in three forms: (a to b) 24 cans of soda to each case of soda (a:b) 24 cans of soda: 1 case of soda (a/b) 24 cans of soda/1 case of soda This chapter uses conversion factors frequently to solve problems. Conversion factors are ratios written in the fraction form (a/b). In this chapter, there are three major conversion factors we will learn to use: A universal conversion factor: 1 mole of chemical contains 6.02 x 1023 molecules (or atoms) A molar mass conversion factor: 1 mole of chemical weighs the molar mass of the chemical A chemical formula conversion factor: 1 mole of chemical contains some number of moles of atoms If the chemical in the three conversion factors was CuCl2, then the three conversion factors would be: 23 1 mole of CuCl2 contains 6.02 x 10 molecules of CuCl2 1 mole of CuCl2 weighs 134.6 grams CuCl2 (the molar mass) 1 mole of CuCl2 contains 2 moles of chlorine atoms 1 The most common way that chemists represent ratios is in a fraction form. The three conversion factors would look like this in the fraction form: 1 mole CuCl2 1 mole CuCl2 1 mole CuCl2 23 6.02 x 10 molecule CuCl2 134.6 g CuCl2 2 mole Cl atoms Each of these conversion factors can be written in the inverse form.
    [Show full text]
  • Mc2 " Mc2 , E = K + Mc2 = ! Mc2 for Particle of Charge Q and Mass M Moving in B Field : P = ! Mu = Qbr E2 = ( Pc)2 + (Mc2 )2
    Department of Physics Modern Physics (2D) University of California Prof. V. Sharma San Diego Quiz # 3 (Jan 28, 2005) Some Relevant Formulae, Constants and Identities p = ! mu, K = ! mc2 " mc2 , E = K + mc2 = ! mc2 For particle of charge q and mass m moving in B field : p = ! mu = qBR E2 = ( pc)2 + (mc2 )2 In Photoelectric Effect E= hf = Kmax + # 23 Avagadro's Number NA = 6.022 $ 10 particles/mole Planck's Constant h=6.626 $ 10-34J.s=4.136 $ 10-15eV.s 1 eV = 1.602 $ 10-19 J -14 2 Electron rest mass = 8.2 $ 10 J = 0.511 MeV/c Proton rest mass = 1.673$ 10-27Kg = 938.3MeV/c2 Speed of Light in vaccum c = 2.998 $ 108m/s Electron charge = 1.602 $ 10-19 C Atomic mass unit u = 1.6605 $ 10-27kg = 931.49 MeV/c2 Please write your scratch work in pencil and write your answer in indelible ink in your Blue book. Please write your code number clearly on each page. Please plug in numbers only at the very end of your calculations. Department of Physics Modern Physics (2D) University of California Prof. V. Sharma San Diego Quiz # 3 (Jan 28, 2005) Problem 1: Weapons of Mass Destruction [10 pts] (a) How much energy is released in the explosion of a fission bomb containing 3.0kg of fissionable material? Assume that 0.10% of the rest mass is converted to released energy? (b) What mass of TNT would have to explode to provide the same energy release? Assume that each mole of TNT liberates 3.4MJ of energy on exploding.
    [Show full text]