DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Superior-North Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Superior-North Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report Lake Superior – North Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report January 2017 Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs MPCA Watershed Report Team: by using the Internet to distribute reports and John Sandberg, Jesse Anderson, Benjamin information to wider audience. Visit our website Lundeen, Nathan Sather, Michael Bourdaghs, for more information. Sophia Vaughan, Kelli Nerem, Jeff Jasperson, Dave MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- Christopherson, Bruce Monson, Shawn Nelson, consumer recycled content paper manufactured Kris Parson, Stacia Grayson without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Contributors / acknowledgements Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Cook County Soil and Water Conservation District Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | [email protected] This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: wq-ws3-04010101b List of acronyms AMA Aquatic Management Area MTS Meets the Standard AUID Assessment Unit Identification N Nitrogen Determination Nitrate-N Nitrate Plus Nitrite Nitrogen BEACH Beaches Environmental Assessment and NA Not Assessed Coastal Health NH3 Ammonia BWCAW Boundary Waters Canoe Area NS Not Supporting Wilderness NT No Trend CI Confidence Interval NWI National Wetlands Inventory CWA Clean Water Act OP Orthophosphate CWLA Clean Water Legacy Act P Phosphorous DOP Dissolved Orthophosphate PCB Poly Chlorinated Biphenyls E Eutrophic PFC Perfluorinated chemicals EQuIS Environmental Quality Information PFOS Perflurooctane sulfonate System PJG Professional Judgment Group EX Exceeds Criteria (Bacteria) RNA Research Natural Area EXP Exceeds Criteria, Potential Impairment RNR River Nutrient Region EXS Exceeds Criteria, Potential Severe Impairment SWAG Surface Water Assessment Grant FQA Floristic Quality Assessment SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District FIBI Fish-based Index of Biotic Integrity SWUD State Water Use Database FILLET Skin-off fillet TALU Tiered Aquatic Life Uses FILSK Skin-on fillet TKN Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen FS Full Support TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load FWMC Flow Weighted Mean Concentration TP Total Phosphorous HUC Hydrologic Unit Code TSS Total Suspended Solids IBI Index of Biotic Integrity UAA Use Attainability Analysis IF Insufficient Information UMD-NRRI University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute K Potassium EPA United States Environmental Protection LRVW Limited Resource Value Water Agency M Mesotrophic USGS United States Geological Survey MCL Maximum Contaminant Level WHORG Whole fish MDA Minnesota Department of Agriculture WPLMN Water Pollutant Load Monitoring MDH Minnesota Department of Health Network MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MGS Minnesota Geological Survey MIBI Macroinvertebrate-based Index of Biotic Integrity MINLEAP Minnesota Lake Eutrophication Analysis Procedure MPCA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MSHA Minnesota Stream Habitat Assessment Contents List of acronyms .................................................................................................................................1 Contents ............................................................................................................................................1 Tables ................................................................................................................................................2 Figures ...............................................................................................................................................3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................7 The watershed monitoring approach ............................................................................................................... 8 Assessment methodology ............................................................................................................................... 12 Watershed overview ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Watershed-wide data collection methodology .............................................................................................. 30 Individual 10-HUC subwatershed results ........................................................................................... 36 10-HUC subwatersheds .................................................................................................................................. 36 Arrow River subwatershed HUC 0401010101 ............................................................................ 38 Pigeon River subwatershed HUC 0401010102 ............................................................................... 41 Flute Reed River subwatershed HUC 0401010103 ................................................................................. 50 Brule River subwatershed HUC 0401010104 .......................................................................................... 55 Devil Track River subwatershed HUC 0401010105 ................................................................................. 68 Cascade River subwatershed HUC 0401010106................................................................................... 79 Poplar River subwatershed HUC 0401010107 ..................................................................................... 86 Temperance River subwatershed HUC 0401010108 .............................................................................. 97 Cross River subwatershed HUC 0401010109 ............................................................................. 105 Manitou River subwatershed HUC 0401010110 .................................................................................. 113 Baptism River subwatershed HUC 0401010111 .................................................................................... 122 Watershed-wide results and discussion .......................................................................................... 132 Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network .......................................................................................... 132 Stream water quality .................................................................................................................................... 142 Lake water quality ........................................................................................................................................ 143 Fish contaminant results .............................................................................................................................. 144 Groundwater monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 144 Stream flow .................................................................................................................................................. 147 Wetland condition ........................................................................................................................................ 148 Pollutant trends for the Lake Superior – North Watershed .......................................................................... 154 Summaries and recommendations ................................................................................................. 155 Literature cited .............................................................................................................................. 159 Appendix 1 - Water chemistry definitions .................................................................................................... 162 Appendix 2 - Intensive water chemistry monitoring stations in the Lake Superior – North Watershed ...... 164 Appendix 3.1 - AUID table of stream assessment results by parameter and beneficial use ........................ 165 Appendix 3.2 - Assessment results for lakes in the Lake Superior – North Watershed ................................ 169 Appendix 4.1 - Minnesota statewide IBI thresholds and confidence limits .................................................. 173 Appendix 4.2 - Biological monitoring results – fish IBI ................................................................................. 174 Appendix 4.3 - Biological monitoring results – macroinvertebrate IBI ......................................................... 176 Appendix 5.1 - Minnesota’s ecoregion-based lake eutrophication standards ............................................. 180 Appendix 5.2 - MINLEAP model estimates of phosphorus loads for lakes, Lake Superior - North Watershed .......................................................................................................................................... 181 Appendix 6 – Fish species found during biological monitoring surveys ........................................................ 182 Appendix 7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watertrail Map 3.FH10
    LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL LAKE SUPERIOR Be familiar with dangers of hypothermia and Anticipate changes in weather, wind and wave by ake Superior is the largest freshwater dress appropriately for the cold water (32 to 50 monitoring a weather or marine VHF radio, and using lake on our planet, containing 10% of all degrees Fahrenheit). your awareness and common sense. the fresh water on earth. The lake's 32,000 Cold water is a killer - wearing a wet or dry suit is The National Weather Service broadcasts a 24 hour square mile surface area stretches across strongly recommended. updated marine forecast on KIG 64, weather band the border between the United States and channel 1 on the maritime VHF frequency, from Duluth; Canada; two countries, three states, one province Seek instruction and practice kayak skills, in- a version of this broadcast can be heard by calling 218- Route Description and many First Nations surround Superior's magnif- cluding rescues, before paddling on Lake Superior. 729-6697, press 4 for Lake Superior weather informa- (continued from other side) icent shoreline. The diverse natural history and Be certain your boat has adequate bow and stern tion. cultural heritage of the Lake Superior region offers flotation and that you have access to a pump for In Miles (0.0 at Minnesota Entrance -Duluth Lift Bridge) paddlers a unique experience on this remarkable emptying a flooded boat. Fog frequently restricts visibility to zero. global resource. Bring a good compass and know how to use it. 86.9 Lutsen Resort. One of the classic landmarks Travel with a companion or group.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandpiper Pipeline & Line 3 Replacement Projects With
    SANDPIPER PIPELINE & LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROJECTS WITH ROUTE ALTERNATIVES (REGIONAL) Emerson C A N A D A â â â Noyes Saint â Joseph K i t t s o n Twsp 59 K i t t s o n Caribou â ST 171 â â ST C o u n tt y WMA Pembina St. North Saint Roseau â â Vincent Vincent â Clow Richardville MIINNESOTA Caribou Pohlitz Dieter Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Skull Twsp Northwest Twsp Twsp Roseau Lake WMA McKinley Roseau Roseau Lake WMA Twsp Twsp River WMA â âHumboldt â â âBathgate Jadis Twsp â â âLancaster Hill Soler Moose Roseau Spruce â Hampden Granville Poppleton Cannon Ross â Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp â Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Beaches Lake WMA Hamilton ST5 â ST5 â â â East Kittson Badger Twsp â North Red Hallock â â Malung â P e m b ii n a River Hallock Thompson Hazelton Percy Polonia Barto Skagen Stokes Stafford Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp C o u n tt y Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Lake '10W Brâonson Lake B ronson State Park â R o s e a u Mickinock â Glasston R o s e a u Twsp â r South Red Greenbush e â C o u n t y v C o u n t y i River ââ R Twsp Norway Pelan â d Twsp WMA e Skane Tegner Jupiter Dewey Barnett Nereson Grimstad â â R Twsp Twsp Twsp Pelan Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp âHalma Twsp Hereim Wannaska Twsp â â âKennedy â Nereson â â â â St.
    [Show full text]
  • MN History Magazine
    THIS IS a revised version of a talk given before the St. Louis Ccninty Historical Society on February 23, 1954. The author, who teaches political science in the University of Minnesota, Duluth Branch, became interested in traces of early logging and mining operations while hunting and fishing in the Arrowhead region. Some Vanished Settlements of th£ ARROWHEAD COUNTRY JULIUS F. WOLFF, JR. FOR MORE THAN two centuries Minne­ in the 1840s in search of copper and other sota has been known to white men who minerals. Such prospecting, however, was were exploring, trading, mining, logging, really poaching, since the area was Indian fishing, or farming in the area. The thriving territory until it was ceded to the United communities of today are monuments to suc­ States by the treaty of La Pointe in 1854. cessful pioneer expansion in many fields. Yet One of the first accounts of white habitation there are numerous sites in Koochiching, on the shore dates from the fall of that Cook, Lake, and St. Louis counties that tell year, when R. B. McLean, a prospector who a different story — a story of failure, of at­ later became the area's first mail carrier, tempts at settlement that did not bear fruit. accompanied a party which scoured the White habitation in northeastern Minne­ shore for copper outcrops, McLean noted a sota is largely confined to the last hundred few settlers near the mouths of the French, years. To be sure, explorers, missionaries, Sucker, Knife, and Encampment rivers and and fur traders visited the area repeatedly at Grand Marais.^ after the seventeenth century and estab­ During the next two years a wave of lished scattered trading posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Regions of Minnesota: Level III and IV Maps and Descriptions Denis White March 2020
    Ecological Regions of Minnesota: Level III and IV maps and descriptions Denis White March 2020 (Image NOAA, Landsat, Copernicus; Presentation Google Earth) A contribution to the corpus of materials created by James Omernik and colleagues on the Ecological Regions of the United States, North America, and South America The page size for this document is 9 inches horizontal by 12 inches vertical. Table of Contents Content Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Geographic patterns in Minnesota 1 Geographic location and notable features 1 Climate 1 Elevation and topographic form, and physiography 2 Geology 2 Soils 3 Presettlement vegetation 3 Land use and land cover 4 Lakes, rivers, and watersheds; water quality 4 Flora and fauna 4 3. Methods of geographic regionalization 5 4. Development of Level IV ecoregions 6 5. Descriptions of Level III and Level IV ecoregions 7 46. Northern Glaciated Plains 8 46e. Tewaukon/BigStone Stagnation Moraine 8 46k. Prairie Coteau 8 46l. Prairie Coteau Escarpment 8 46m. Big Sioux Basin 8 46o. Minnesota River Prairie 9 47. Western Corn Belt Plains 9 47a. Loess Prairies 9 47b. Des Moines Lobe 9 47c. Eastern Iowa and Minnesota Drift Plains 9 47g. Lower St. Croix and Vermillion Valleys 10 48. Lake Agassiz Plain 10 48a. Glacial Lake Agassiz Basin 10 48b. Beach Ridges and Sand Deltas 10 48d. Lake Agassiz Plains 10 49. Northern Minnesota Wetlands 11 49a. Peatlands 11 49b. Forested Lake Plains 11 50. Northern Lakes and Forests 11 50a. Lake Superior Clay Plain 12 50b. Minnesota/Wisconsin Upland Till Plain 12 50m. Mesabi Range 12 50n. Boundary Lakes and Hills 12 50o.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan City of Hibbing (St
    Comprehensive Plan City of Hibbing (St. Louis County, MN) Accepted and Filed by Vote of Hibbing City Council on December 19, 2018 Hibbing’s Centennial Fountain located near City Hall, 2018 1 Prepared for: City of Hibbing, MN Hibbing, MN City Offices Phone: (218) 262-3486 Mail: City of Hibbing 401 East 21st Street Hibbing, MN 55746 Website: www.hibbing.mn.us 2 Acknowledgements The City of Hibbing, Hibbing City Council and Comprehensive Planning Steering Committee would like to thank our residents and stakeholders for your valuable contributions to the development of this Comprehensive Plan. Your participation in the survey process, Community Visioning Sessions, interviews and discussions have helped us as a community to define a vision, identify our core community values and establish goals and plans for our future. We have valued your ideas and input and will do our best to include and address them as we all work together to carry this plan forward. We would also like to acknowledge the Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation Board for providing financial contributions and support for this project. Hibbing City Council and Administration Rick Cannata, Mayor Patty Shafer, Councilor Tom Dicklich, City Administrator Jack Lund, Councilor Patrick L. Garrity, City Clerk/Treasurer Tim Harkonen, Councilor Ray Pierce, Jr., Councilor Jennifer Hoffman Saccoman, Councilor Comprehensive Planning Steering Committee Members Georgia Andria Shaun Germolus Kim McLaughlin James Bayliss Marcia Grahek Heather Matvey Celia Cameron Councilor Jennifer Nathan Pederson Hoffman Saccoman Mayor Rick Cannata James Plese Pat Ives Austin Dusek Jackie Prescott Wayne Kangas Justin Fosso Dan Scally Jennifer Lucarelli Pat Furlong Shari Majkich Brock Nicole Gandrud Plan Adoption The Hibbing City Council this Comprehensive Plan during its regularly scheduled public meeting on December 19, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Eaws--Comments Due on February 1,1995
    3 I Published by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board \ EQB Monitor January 2,1995 Volume 19, #14 Next issuddeadline: January 16IJanua1y 9 EAWS--COMMENTS DUE ON FEBRUARY 1,1995 Project tile: Valley Creek Road (Washington CSAH 16) Description: Valley Creek Road is proposed for reconstruction from Interlachen Parkway to 800 feet east of St. John Drive in Woodbury. The roadway is currently a 2-lane road with 8 foot paved shoulders west of Woodbury Drive and 2 foot gravel shoulders east of Woodbury Drive. Generally about 150 feet of right-of-way is available. The typical cross section for the preferred alternative consists of 2 lanes in each direction with right and left Nm lanes at major intersect~ons. A raised concrete median will separate east and west bound lanes. RGU: Washington County Contact person: Don Theisen, Deputy Director of Public Works, Washington County, 11660 Myeron Road N., Stillwater, MN 55082; 612-430-4300. < Project title: Tiller Corporation Mining, West Lakeland Township Description: The proposed project by Tiller Corporation (Barton Sand and Gravel) is to continue the operation and expand an existing sand and gravel mine. The operation will mine 150 acres of land over the next 25 years. The material excavated, sand and gravel, will be crushed and washed and used concrete and asphalt will be recycled to create a finished product. RGU: Washington County Contact person: Kathy Nordine, Land Use Specialist, Washington County, 14900 61st Street N., P.O. Box 3803, Stillwater, MN 55082-3803; 612-430-6715. Project title: Zimmerman Water System Improvements Description: The City of Zierman is proposing to construct a new city well, a water tower and a new sanitary sewer and water main that would extend about 1-112 miles west of town.
    [Show full text]
  • What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
    A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !I Parking
    Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !i Parking Rose Lake East South Lake Clearwater Lake West Trailhead Crab Lake Topper Lake Gogebic Lake Pine Ridge Loon Lake Pine Lake Loon Lake Landing Clearwater Road McFarland Lake Crab Lake Trailhead South Lake Trailhead Portage Brook Otter Lake Trailhead East Trailhead Otter Lake 0 15 30 60 90 120 Miles ´ The Border Route Trail is a 65-mile long hiking trail that crosses the The Border Route Trail is a rugged Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) in the far northeast wilderness hiking trail that follows corner of Minnesota (Arrowhead) and follows the international border ridge-lines and the top of high cliffs between Minnesota and Ontario, Canada. It connects with the Superior wherever feasible. Therefore, hiking Hiking Trail on its eastern terminus and with the Kekekabic Trail on its the trail offers expansive views across western end at the Gunflint Trail (Cook Cty. Road 12). The closest towns the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in are Grand Marais (beginning of Gunflint Trail, County Rd 12) and Hovland Minnesota and Quetico Provincal Park (beginning of Arrowhead Trail, County Road 16). In addition to the in Canada. eastern and western termini, the Border Route Trail can be accessed through several spur and connecting trails, allowing for hiking trips ranging from short day-hikes to multiday backpacking expeditions. http://www.borderroutetrail.org/ Sources: Boarder Route Trail Association, Esri, MN DNR, BWCA photos.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Vulnerability of Brook Trout in Lake Superior’S Tributary Streams of Minnesota
    Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Vulnerability of Brook Trout in Lake Superior’s Tributary Streams of Minnesota Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth William Herb, St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Meijun Cai, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth Report to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, upon completion of contract # MN DNR/1229G WO 47578 Natural Resources Research Institute technical report number NRRI/TR-2013/05 1 Executive Summary Water temperature is generally considered one of the primary physical habitat parameter determining the suitability of stream habitat for fish species, with effects on the mortality, metabolism, growth, behavior, and reproduction of individuals. In this study we assessed the potential threats of climate change on stream temperatures and flow regimes in Lake Superior tributary streams in Minnesota, USA. The study included deterministic models for stream flow and temperature of three study streams (Amity Creek, Baptism River, Knife River), and regional (empirical) models for specific flow and temperature parameters to give better spatial coverage of the region. Information on stream flow, stream temperature, and land cover was used to develop a brook trout presence/absence model to understand the current pattern of distribution of brook trout and predict future distributions under future climate. The hydrology of north shore streams is mainly driven by air temperature and precipitation. Historical air temperatures in the region have a significant upward trend, particularly since 1980. Global climate model (GCM) outputs project a continued increasing trend in air temperature, with an increase in mean annual air temperature of 2 to 3 °C by 2089.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Trends at Minnesota Milestone Sites
    Water Quality Trends for Minnesota Rivers and Streams at Milestone Sites Five of seven pollutants better, two getting worse June 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and David Christopherson information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-s1-71 1 Summary Long-term trend analysis of seven different water pollutants measured at 80 locations across Minnesota for more than 30 years shows consistent reductions in five pollutants, but consistent increases in two pollutants. Concentrations of total suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria have significantly decreased, but nitrate and chloride concentrations have risen, according to data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) “Milestone” monitoring network. Recent, shorter-term trends are consistent with this pattern, but are less pronounced. Pollutant concentrations show distinct regional differences, with a general pattern across the state of lower levels in the northeast to higher levels in the southwest. These trends reflect both the successes of cleaning up municipal and industrial pollutant discharges during this period, and the continuing challenge of controlling the more diffuse “nonpoint” polluted runoff sources and the impacts of increased water volumes from artificial drainage practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Inventory Form
    MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM Project: Historic Bridge Study - Phase III Beaver Bay Township, Lake County, Minnesota Identification SHPO Inventory Number LA-BBT-022 Historic Name Old Baptism River Bridge; Bridge 3459 Review and Compliance Number Current Name Bridge 3459 Field # Form (New or Updated) Updated Address Tettegouche State Park entrance over the Baptism River Description City/Twp Beaver Bay Linear Feature? No County Lake HPC Status Legal Desc. Twp 056N Range 07W Sec 15 QQ SENE Resource Type Structure USGS Quad Illgen City Architect/Engineer Minnesota Highway Department UTM Zone 15 Datum 83 Style N/A Easting 636055 Northing 5244186 Construction Date 1924 Property ID (PIN) Original Use Transportation Current Use Transportation Description Bridge 3459 is a five-span Baltimore deck truss bridge constructed in 1923-1924 by the Minnesota Department of Highways (MHD). It carries the Tettegouche State Park entrance road over the Baptism River in eastern Lake County, Minnesota. The bridge, aligned in a northeast-southwest direction, was originally constructed to carry Trunk Highway (TH) 1 (later designated as United States Highway [US] and eventually TH 61) over the Baptism River as part of the North Shore Drive along Lake Superior. It was bypassed in the late 1960s and non-historic Bridge 38007 now carries TH 61 about 100 feet northwest of Bridge 3459. At this location, the Baptism River channel is very deep and rocky, with the Lake Superior shoreline about 500 feet southeast of the bridge. Surrounding areas are heavily wooded. A roadside rest area is located about 700 feet northeast of the bridge’s north end, where the Tettegouche State Park entrance drive intersects with TH 61.
    [Show full text]