DOCSLIB.ORG

附录I 《中国植物志》、 Flora of China和the Plant List中存在的问题案例

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
附录I 《中国植物志》、 Flora of China和the Plant List中存在的问题案例 附录 I 《中国植物志》、Flora of China和The Plant List中存在的问题案例 Appendix I Cases of problems found in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Flora of China, and The Plant List by means of comparison 科名 种或种下 分类群 名称 原始文献 页码 日期 简评 Family Specific or infraspecific name Literature Collation Year Brief comments Araucariaceae Araucaria cunninghamii Aiton ex D. Don Descr. Pinus, ed. 2 3: t.79 1837 FRPS 和 FOC 中 鉴定错误, 应为Araucaria colummaris (J.R. Forster) Hooker Araucariaceae Dammara alba Rumph. ex Hassk. Tijdschr. Natuurl. Gesch. 9: 179 1842 FOC记载的 作者Rumphius 为ex Blume, 但是 未提 供文献出, 处 Physiol. 无法核对 Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus fortunei var. globosa S.Y. Hu Taiwania 10: 28 1964 TPL有一 个 重复项, 由空格 造成 Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus fortunei var. lanceolata (K.M. Feng Phytologia 68: 27 1990 FOC基本名 的作 者引证错, 应为(K.M. Feng 误ex W.C. Cheng ex C.Y. Cheng, W.C. Cheng & al) Silba & al.) Silba, TPL中作者也 错误； 诚静容在 《中国 植物志》 中负 责倪藤类 ； 三 尖 杉属的作 者是郑, 这在 万钧、 傅立国 和 赵奇僧 《中国植 物志》 中有记载 Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus lanceolata K.M. Feng ex W.C. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 13(4): 86 1975 FOC中作者 引证, Cephalotaxus 不准确 lanceolata K.M. Feng in Cheng & al. W. C. Cheng & al., Acta Phytotax. Sin. 13(4): 86. 1975., 应该是 K. M. Feng ex Cheng & al., TPL正确 Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus sinensis (Rehder & E.H. Wilson) Lloydia 16: 162 1954 FOC记载 年代1953年 为, 应为1954年。参Contributions 考“ to H.L.Li Botany by Hui-Lin Li, Ph.D.” Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus wilsoniana Hayata Icon. Pl. Formosan. 4: 22 1914 FOC记载 分子 结果C. 建议harringtonii 处理的一个变 为 , 但 种 在 FOC 中仍记Cephalotaxus 载为 sinensis var. wilsoniana (Hayata) L.K. Fu & Nan Li, 应修 改 Cupressaceae Juniperus baimashanensis Y.F. Yu & L.K. Fu Novon 7: 443 1997 FOC引证文献年为1998年, 但是原文献为1997年, TPL应该被 纠正为1997年 Cupressaceae Juniperus chengii L.K. Fu & Y.F. Yu Novon 7:443 1997 FOC引证文 献年1998年, 核原 为 始文献, 纠正1997 为年 Cupressaceae Juniperus chinensis var. tsukusiensis (Masam.) Unknown FOC错误拼写, TPL用的是tsukushiensis, 同时对tsukusiensis标 Masam. 为Unknown Cupressaceae Juniperus formosana Hayata J. Bot. (Morot) 25(19): 209 1908 FOC记载文 献不, 为J. Coll. 同 Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 25(19): 209. 1908, 核实 该文献确 实收录 该名称 Cupressaceae Juniperus pingii var. carinata Y.F. Yu & L.K. Fu Novon 7: 443 1997 FOC记载文 献年1998, 经核 代为 , 为 对1997年 Cupressaceae Juniperus pseudosabina var. turkestanica (Kom.) Phytologia Mem. 7: 36 1984 FOC拼写错, Juniperus 误 pseudosabina var. takastanica (Koma- Silba rov) Silba, Phytologia Mem. 7: 36. 1984, 变种加词应为 turkestanica Cupressaceae Sabina sargentii (A.Henry) Nakai Tyosen Sanrin Kaiho 158: 32 1938 S. sargentii的命名人在FOC中为(A.Henry) Miyabe & Tatewaki, 与IK和TPL不同, FOC错误, Nakai在这篇文 献中发 表很多新 名 称 Cycadaceae Cycas balansae Warb. Monsunia 1: 181 1900 FOC记载文献179 页码页, IK记载 为 该名称在179页和181页中 均出现, 引证181页正确 Cycadaceae Cycas circinalis var. pectinata (Griff.) Schuster Engler, Pflanzenr. 99 4(1): 68 1932 TPL中 有两个, 但是作 同名 者不同, 另一个Cycas 为 circinalis Linnaeus var. pectinata (Griffith) Schuster；FOC在Cycas pecti- 科名 种或种下分类群名称 原始文献 页码 日期 简评 Family Specific or infraspecific name Literature Collation Year Brief comments nata Buchanan-Hamilton下引了一个异名为C. pectinata Griffith Cycadaceae Cycas circinalis var. pectinata (Buch.-Ham.) J. Pflanzenr. IV, 1: 68 1932 TPL记载了两个同名, 注意两个名称的文献出处相同。FOC未 Schust. 处理此名, 需要补充 Cycadaceae Cycas hongheensis S.Y. Yang & S.L. Yang Encephalartos 40: 11 1994 FOC记载为Cycas hongheensis S.Y. Yang & S. L. Yang ex D.Y. Wang in F.X. Wang et al., Cycads in China. 62. 1996 Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata f. hongheensis (S.Y. Yang & FOC未指明出处, TPL缺该名称的文献, 考证该名称的文献为 S.L. Yang ex D.Y. Wang) Z.T. Guan Cycads of China (eds. Z.T. Guan & L. Zhou) 18 (1996) Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata Griff. Not. Pl. Asiat. 10, pl. 360, 1854 FOC用的是Cycas pectinata Buchanan-Hamilton, Cycas pecti- f. 3 nata Griff. Not. Pl. Asiat. 10, pl. 360, f. 3 10 1854.是Cycas pec- tinata Buchanan-Hamilton的异名 Cycadaceae Cycas revoluta Thunb. Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. 4: 40 1783 FOC记载文献不同且更早, Verh. Holl. Maatsch. Weetensch. Upsal. Haarlem 20(2): 424, 426–427. 1782 Cycadaceae Cycas spiniformis F.N. Wei Guihaia 17: 211 1997 FOC记载作者为J.Y. Liang, 经核对原文献, TPL错误, 应为 Cycas spiniformis J.Y. Liang Ephedraceae Ephedra equisetina Bunge Beitr. Fl. Russl. 324 1852 TPL文献有问题, FOC记载更早的文献, Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersb. ser. 6, Sci. Math. 7: 501. 1851, 应用早的文献 Ephedraceae Ephedra intermedia Schrenk & C.A. Mey. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. 7(2): 278 1846 FOC记载命名人和文献卷号为Schrenk ex C.A. Meyer, 5: 278. Saint-Pétersbourg,Sér. 6,Sci. 1846, 与TPL不同, 经核对原文献, TPL正确 Math.,Seconde Pt. Sci. Nat. Ephedraceae Ephedra lomatolepis Schrenk Bull. Cl. Phys.-Math. Acad. 3: 210 1844 FOC记载文献页码为3: 2. 1845, 与TPL不同, 考证文献, 页码 Imp. Sci. Saint-Pétersbourg 也为210 Ephedraceae Ephedra przewalskii Stapf Denkschr. Kaiserl. Akad. 54: 40 1889 FOC记载为56(2): 1889, 原文献标为56卷, TPL记载错误 Wiss.,Wien. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Gnetaceae Gnetum pendulum f. intermedium C.Y. Cheng Acta Phytotax. Sin. 13(4): 88 1975 不合格发表名称 Gnetaceae Gnetum gnemon L. Mant. Pl. 1: 125 1767 FOC中记载为另一个文献Syst. Nat., ed. 12, 2: 637. 1770, 核 实Syst. Nat., 确实存在, 但年代晚于1767, 原始文献引证为 Mant.Pl.1: 125. 1767. Gnetaceae Gnetum montanum Markgr. Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, 10: 466 1930 FOC记载文献为第406页, 与TPL不同, IK也记载为466页, 核 ser. 3 原文献, FOC错误, IK、TPL正确 Pinaceae Abies taxifolia Lambert 1803 TPL缺文献, FOC记载为Abies taxifolia Lambert (1803), not Salisbury (1796), 补充。核原始文献, Pinus taxifolia Lamb. Descr. Pinus [Lambert] 1: 51 (t. 33). 1803, 未见到Abies taxifolia Lambert Pinaceae Pseudotsuga sinensis var. gaussenii (Flous) Silba TPL缺文献, 补充为J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15: 63 2008. 另, FOC未收录, 国内名录中应补充 Pinaceae Abies recurvata subsp. ernestii (Rehder) Silba J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15: 44 2008 最近发表, FOC未收录, 国内名录中应补充 Pinaceae Keteleeria davidiana subsp. chien-peii (Flous) J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15: 48 2008 最近发表, FOC未收录, 加词拼写纠正为Keteleeria chienpeii Silba Flous, 国内名录中应补充 科名 种或种下分类群名称 原始文献 页码 日期 简评 Family Specific or infraspecific name Literature Collation Year Brief comments Pinaceae Keteleeria davidiana var. chien-peii (Flous) W.C. in Fl. Reipubl. Popul. Sin. 7: 48 1978 基本名为Keteleeria chienpeii Flous, 加词拼写纠正 Cheng & L.K. Fu Pinaceae Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen. Trudy Bot. Muz. Rossiisk. 18: 41 1920 IPNI中有一早出同名, Larix gmelinii Ledeb. ex Gordon Pinetum Akad. Nauk 123. 1858 [Jun-Dec 1858]为不合格发表名称。考证, Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen.的基本名为Abies gmelinii Rupr., Beitr. Pflanzenk. Russ. Reiches 2: 56. 1845。 Pinaceae Larix griffithiana (Lindl. & Gordon) Carrière Traité Gén. Conif. 278 1855 FOC记载作者不同, 没有TPL中的基本名作者, 经考证, FOC 正确, TPL的基本名Abies griffithiana Lindl. & Gordon, J. Hort. Soc. London 5: 214 (1850), nom. nud.是个裸名 Pinaceae Larix olgensis f. viridis (E.H. Wilson) Y.C. Yang Acta Phytotax. Sin. 9(2): 172 1964 Larix olgensis f. viridis (E.H. Wilson) Nakai的晚出同名, 杨衔 & S.C. Nie 晋等（1964）错 误 , 同种中改变变种隶属关系, 不能叫做组合, Larix olgensis f. viridis 的命名人是E.H. Wilson, 而不是(E.H. Wilson) Y.C. Yang & S.C. Nie是非法名称 Pinaceae Larix olgensis f. intermedia Y.C. Yang & S.C. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 9: 172 1964 TPL记载还有一个早出同名：Larix olgensis f. intermedia Taken. Nie (1942)【《国立中央博物馆时报》第17号（1942）8】, 同种中 改变变种隶属关系, 不能叫做组合, Larix olgensis f. intermedia 的命名人仍然是Taken.而不是(Taken.) Y.C. Yang & S.C. Nie Pinaceae Larix principis-rupprechtii var. wulingschanensis Neo-Lineam. Fl. Manshur. 48 1979 FOC未收录, 基本名为Larix wulingschanensis Liou & Z. Wang (Liou & Q.L. Wang) Kitag. in T.N. Liou, Ill. Fl. Lign. Pl. N. E. China: 547 (1958), 邱园名录 处理为Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii (Mayr) Pilger的 异名 Pinaceae Picea likiangensis var. montigena (Mast.) W.C. Taxon. Chin. Trees 40 1937 分类等级应提升, 处理为种, 野外近于绝灭 Cheng ex Chen Pinaceae Picea meyeri Rehder & E.H. Wilson Pl. Wilson. 2: 28 1914 FOC中文名错误, 应是白扦, 参考《中国植物志》 Pinaceae Picea mongolica (H.Q. Wu) W.D. Xu TPL缺文献, 查找该名称出自：Bull. Bot. Res. 14(1): 66. 1994. Pinaceae Picea wilsonii Mast. Gard. Chron. ser. 3 33: 133. f. 1903 FOC中文名错误, 应为青扦, 参考《中国植物志》 55–56. Pinaceae Pinus excelsa Lam. Fl. Franç. 2: 202 1779 FOC记载年代为1778年, 考证文献, 应为1779年 Pinaceae Pinus griffithiana Voss Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 16: 93 1907 FOC记载为Pinus griffithiana (Carr.) Voss, 查阅文献发现, FOC 是正确名称, 该名称的基本名是Larix griffithiana Carrière, Traité Gén. Conif.: 278 (1855) Pinaceae Pinus yunnanensis var. pygmaea (Hsueh f.) in Fl. Reipubl. Popul. Sin. 7: 258 1978 FOC记载作者错误, FRPS中并未标出Hsueh的贡献, 松属是由 Hsueh f. Law等完成, 因此, 应该是Pinus yunnanensis var. pygmaea (Hsueh) Hsueh ex Law & al. Pinaceae Pseudotsuga sinensis subsp. gaussenii (Flous) J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15: 63 2008 最近发表, FOC未收录, 国内名录中应增补 Silba Pinaceae Pseudotsuga sinensis subsp. forrestii (Craib) J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15: 63 2008 最近发表, FOC未收录, 应该是Pseudotsuga forrestii Craib, 国 Silba 内名录中增补 科名 种或种下分类群名称 原始文献 页码 日期 简评 Family Specific or infraspecific name Literature Collation Year Brief comments Podocarpaceae Dacrycarpus imbricatus (Blume) de Laub. J. Arnold Arbor. 50: 317 1969 FOC页码为320, TPL为317, 核对原始文献, 页码为317 Taxaceae Taxus cuspidata var. chinensis (Pilg.) Rehder & Pl. Wilson. 2(1): 8 1914 FOC记载作者与TPL不同, T. cuspidata var. chinensis (Pilger) E.H. Wilson C.K. Schneider. TPL中记载该名称被C.K. Schneider和Rehder & E.H. Wilson组合两次, 均为Taxus wallichiana var. chinensis (Pilg.) Florin的异名 Taxodiaceae Cryptomeria fortunei Otto & A. Dietr. Allg. Gartenzeitung 21: 234 1853 FOC记载有误, 作为种的时候, Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk ex Otto & Dietr是可用名称, Hooibrenk的名称是不合格发表 Taxodiaceae Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don Trans. Linn. Soc. London 18: 167. t. 1841 FOC未给出基本名, 年代也不同, 为1939, TPL记载为1841年, 13. f. 1 核对原始文献, 为1841年。该期刊无1838年和1839年 Taxodiaceae Cupressus disticha var. imbricata Nutt. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. n.s.,5: 163 1835 TPL文献出处和年代较FOC晚, Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 2: 224. 1818.经考证原始文献, Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 2: 224. 1818记载名 称为C. disticha β. imbricaria, 并非C. disticha var. imbricata Nutt. Taxodiaceae Glyptostrobus aquaticus (Roxb.) R. Parker Indian Forester 51: 61 1925 FOC的基本名作者为Antoinie, 经考证, 基本名为Juniperus aquatica Roxb., Fl. Ind. ed. 1832, 3: 838 (1832), Antoinie的名 称Sabina aquatica (Roxb.) Antoine, Cupress.-Gatt.: 70 (1857)出 现较晚, 是一个组合名, FOC错误, 应纠正 Taxodiaceae Sequoia gigantea (Lindl.) Decne. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 1: 70 1854 not Endlicher(1847), TPL未标注, 补充 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Juniperus Species in Turkey and Their Relations with Other Juniperus Based on Cpdna Supervisor: Prof
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY APRIL 2015 Approval of the thesis MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA submitted by AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Supervisor, Dept. of Biological Sciences METU Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof.Dr. Hayri Duman Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. İrfan Kandemir Biology Dept., Ankara University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Date: iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Aysun Demet GÜVENDİREN Signature : iv ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA Güvendiren, Aysun Demet Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalayan Aromatic Medicinal Plants: a Review of Their Ethnopharmacology, Volatile Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities
    medicines Review Himalayan Aromatic Medicinal Plants: A Review of their Ethnopharmacology, Volatile Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities Rakesh K. Joshi 1, Prabodh Satyal 2 and Wiliam N. Setzer 2,* 1 Department of Education, Government of Uttrakhand, Nainital 263001, India; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-256-824-6519; Fax: +1-256-824-6349 Academic Editor: Lutfun Nahar Received: 24 December 2015; Accepted: 3 February 2016; Published: 19 February 2016 Abstract: Aromatic plants have played key roles in the lives of tribal peoples living in the Himalaya by providing products for both food and medicine. This review presents a summary of aromatic medicinal plants from the Indian Himalaya, Nepal, and Bhutan, focusing on plant species for which volatile compositions have been described. The review summarizes 116 aromatic plant species distributed over 26 families. Keywords: Jammu and Kashmir; Himachal Pradesh; Uttarakhand; Nepal; Sikkim; Bhutan; essential oils 1. Introduction The Himalya Center of Plant Diversity [1] is a narrow band of biodiversity lying on the southern margin of the Himalayas, the world’s highest mountain range with elevations exceeding 8000 m. The plant diversity of this region is defined by the monsoonal rains, up to 10,000 mm rainfall, concentrated in the summer, altitudinal zonation, consisting of tropical lowland rainforests, 100–1200 m asl, up to alpine meadows, 4800–5500 m asl. Hara and co-workers have estimated there to be around 6000 species of higher plants in Nepal, including 303 species endemic to Nepal and 1957 species restricted to the Himalayan range [2–4].
    [Show full text]
  • Bunzo Hayata and His Contributions to the Flora of Taiwan
    TAIWANIA, 54(1): 1-27, 2009 INVITED PAPER Bunzo Hayata and His Contributions to the Flora of Taiwan Hiroyoshi Ohashi Botanical Garden, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-0962, Japan. Email: [email protected] (Manuscript received 10 September 2008; accepted 24 October 2008) ABSTRACT: Bunzo Hayata was the founding father of the study of the flora of Taiwan. From 1900 to 1921 Taiwan’s flora was the focus of his attention. During that time he named about 1600 new taxa of vascular plants from Taiwan. Three topics are presented in this paper: a biography of Bunzo Hayata; Hayata’s contributions to the flora of Taiwan; and the current status of Hayata’s new taxa. The second item includes five subitems: i) floristic studies of Taiwan before Hayata, ii) the first 10 years of Hayata’s study of the flora of Taiwan, iii) Taiwania, iv) the second 10 years, and v) Hayata’s works after the flora of Taiwan. The third item is the first step of the evaluation of Hayata’s contribution to the flora of Taiwan. New taxa in Icones Plantarum Formosanarum vol. 10 and the gymnosperms described by Hayata from Taiwan are exampled in this paper. KEY WORDS: biography, Cupressaceae, flora of Taiwan, gymnosperms, Hayata Bunzo, Icones Plantarum Formosanarum, Taiwania, Taxodiaceae. 1944). Wu (1997) wrote a biography of Hayata in INTRODUCTION Chinese as a botanist who worked in Taiwan during the period of Japanese occupation based biographies and Bunzo Hayata (早田文藏) [1874-1934] (Fig. 1) was memoirs written in Japanese. Although there are many a Japanese botanist who described numerous new taxa in articles on the works of Hayata in Japanese, many of nearly every family of vascular plants of Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Wa Shan – Emei Shan, a Further Comparison
    photograph © Zhang Lin A rare view of Wa Shan almost minus its shroud of mist, viewed from the Abies fabri forested slopes of Emei Shan. At its far left the mist-filled Dadu River gorge drops to 500-600m. To its right the 3048m high peak of Mao Kou Shan climbed by Ernest Wilson on 3 July 1903. “As seen from the top of Mount Omei, it resembles a huge Noah’s Ark, broadside on, perched high up amongst the clouds” (Wilson 1913, describing Wa Shan floating in the proverbial ‘sea of clouds’). Wa Shan – Emei Shan, a further comparison CHRIS CALLAGHAN of the Australian Bicentennial Arboretum 72 updates his woody plants comparison of Wa Shan and its sister mountain, World Heritage-listed Emei Shan, finding Wa Shan to be deserving of recognition as one of the planet’s top hotspots for biological diversity. The founding fathers of modern day botany in China all trained at western institutions in Europe and America during the early decades of last century. In particular, a number of these eminent Chinese botanists, Qian Songshu (Prof. S. S. Chien), Hu Xiansu (Dr H. H. Hu of Metasequoia fame), Chen Huanyong (Prof. W. Y. Chun, lead author of Cathaya argyrophylla), Zhong Xinxuan (Prof. H. H. Chung) and Prof. Yung Chen, undertook their training at various institutions at Harvard University between 1916 and 1926 before returning home to estab- lish the initial Chinese botanical research institutions, initiate botanical exploration and create the earliest botanical gardens of China (Li 1944). It is not too much to expect that at least some of them would have had personal encounters with Ernest ‘Chinese’ Wilson who was stationed at the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard between 1910 and 1930 for the final 20 years of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Flowers of the Tien Shan
    Alpine Flowers of the Tien Shan Naturetrek Tour Report 20 June - 2 July 2009 Juno caerulum Tulipa kaufmanniana Macrotoma ugamensis Himalayan Rubythroat on Juniperus sibirica Report and images courtesy of David Newman Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Alpine Flowers of the Tien Shan Tour Leader: Anna Ivashenko (Local guide & botanist) Tour Participants: Margaret Peil Olive Mason Mary Lee Richard Rolfe David Newman Day 1 Saturday 20th June Fly to Almaty We all departed from Heathrow Terminal One at 10am, and met up at the departure gate of Frankfurt Airport, where the destination and Naturetrek labels gave the clues! The whole flight was very smooth and comfortable. Below us, cultivated fields of central Europe gave way to increasingly large expanses of forest as we headed over Byelorussia and Russia, becoming grassy steppe and very flat. Then ripples at the southern end of the Ural Mountains indicated we were now over Kazakhstan, and the landscape became much drier but faded into purple gloom and the night. Lights below us indicated that Almaty was quite a large spread out city. The airport was smart and straight-forward, and we were met by Zhanara, our interpreter and assistant leader for the trip. A minibus took us along wide tree-lined streets to our international class hotel, Otrara where we checked in and headed straight for bed. Day 2 Sunday 21st June Medua and Chimbulak, Almaty Breakfast had been agreed for 8am.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eco-Plant Model and Its Implication on Mesozoic Dispersed Sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms
    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 293 (2021) 104503 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Review papers The Eco-Plant model and its implication on Mesozoic dispersed sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms Jianguang Zhang a,⁎, Olaf Klaus Lenz b, Pujun Wang c,d, Jens Hornung a a Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstraße 9, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany b Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany c Key Laboratory for Evolution of Past Life and Environment in Northeast Asia (Jilin University), Ministry of Education, Changchun 130026, China d College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, PR China article info abstract Article history: The ecogroup classification based on the growth-form of plants (Eco-Plant model) is widely used for extant, Ce- Received 15 July 2020 nozoic, Mesozoic, and Paleozoic paleoenvironmental reconstructions. However, for most Mesozoic dispersed Received in revised form 2 August 2021 sporomorphs, the application of the Eco-Plant model is limited because either their assignment to a specific Accepted 3 August 2021 ecogroup remains uncertain or the botanical affinities to plant taxa are unclear. By comparing the unique outline Available online xxxx and structure/sculpture of the wall of dispersed sporomorph to the sporomorph wall of modern plants and fossil plants, 861 dispersed Mesozoic sporomorph genera of Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms are Keywords: Botanical affinity reviewed. Finally, 474 of them can be linked to their closest parent plants and Eco-Plant model at family or Ecogroup order level. Based on the demands of the parent plants to different humidity conditions, the Eco-Plant model sep- Paleoenvironment arates between hydrophytes, hygrophytes, mesophytes, xerophytes, and euryphytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciduous Shrubs Prunus Asiatica • Large Shrub to Small Tree 2-10M • Mesophyte, Mesotroph, Can Grow on Infertile Soils • Use - Small Street Tree
    MONGOLIAN CITIES ASSORTMENT OF PLANTS Mongolia and China Plant Hardiness Zones Map https://davisla.wordpress.com Russia Kazakhstan Plant Hardiness Zone Map https://davisla.wordpress.com North America Plant Hardiness Zone Map https://davisla.wordpress.com Coniferous trees Picea obovata • Up to 35 m high tree • Mesophyte, shade-tolerant • Blue ornamental form Offen grows along rivers Coniferous trees Larix sibirica • tree up to 40 m high • oligotrophic, drought and pollution tolerant species Coniferous trees Coniferous trees Abies sibirica • tree up to 30 m high • slow-growing, shade tolerant species • pollution intolerant – towns? • eutrophic, mesophyte! Coniferous trees Pinus sibirica - Siberian Pine • tree up to 40 m high • mesophyte, mesotroph, shade-tolerant • slow-growing, decorative species Coniferous shrubs Pinus pumila Dwarf Siberian Pine . to 8 m tall, nice small shrub . mesopsychrophyte, petrophyte, shade-tolerant Coniferous shrubs Juniperus sibirica . creeping shrub 0,5 m high . tolerant of drought . use - fixation of erosion slopes Coniferous shrubs Juniperus pseudosabina . creeping, prostrate shrub . ground cover plant, slow-growing species, tolerant of drought . use - fixation of erosion slopes Deciduous trees Ulmus pumila . 6-15 m hight . well-adapted to sand . xerophyte, oligotroph, pollution-tolerant, fast- growing . use - good on hedges Deciduous trees Populus laurifolia . tree 10-20 m high . pollution-tolerant, fast-growing . oligothropic, mesophyte . use – good street tree . Yelow fall Deciduous trees Populus tremula
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key to the Cypress Family (Cupressaceae)1
    Feddes Repertorium 116 (2005) 1–2, 96–146 DOI: 10.1002/fedr.200411062 Weinheim, Mai 2005 Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Lehrstuhl für Spezielle Botanik, Bochum C. SCHULZ; P. KNOPF & TH. STÜTZEL Identification key to the Cypress family (Cupressaceae)1 With 11 Figures Summary Zusammenfassung The identification of Cupressaceae taxa, except for Bestimmungsschlüssel für die Familie der Cup- some local and easily distinguishable taxa, is diffi- ressaceae cult even for specialists. One reason for this is the lack of a complete key including all Cupressaceae Die Bestimmung von Cupressaceae-Taxa ist mit taxa, another reason is that diagnoses and descrip- Ausnahme einiger lokaler und leicht bestimmbarer tions are spread over several hundred publications Taxa schwierig, selbst für Spezialisten. Ein Grund, which are sometimes difficult to access. Based on warum es noch keinen vollständigen Bestimmungs- morphological studies of about 3/4 of the species and schlüssel mit allen Cupressaceae-Taxa gibt ist, dass a careful compilation of the most important descrip- die Sippen-Beschreibungen sich auf mehrere hundert tions of Cupressaceae, a first identification key for Publikationen verteilen, welche teilweise schwierig the entire Cypress family (Cupressaceae) could be zu beschaffen sind. Etwa 3/4 der Cupressaceae-Ar- set up. The key comprises any of the 30 genera, 134 ten wurden morphologisch untersucht und die wich- species, 7 subspecies, 38 varieties, one form and thus tigsten Beschreibungen zusammengefasst, daraus all 180 taxa recognized by FARJON (2001). The key wurde dann der erste vollständige Bestimmungs- uses mainly features of adult leaves, female cones schlüssel für Cupressaceae erstellt. Der Bestim- and other characters which are all relatively easy to mungsschlüssel enthält 30 Gattungen, 134 Arten, be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Abies Pinsapo International Trip
    The Conifer Quarterly is the publication of the American Conifer Society Contents 2-3 .................................... President’s Message 4-7 ..............................................Editor’s Corner 8 ...................Central Region Announcement 9 ..............................................Deer Deterrent 10-14 ................................Dwarf Ginkgo Cultivars ............................. Part I: A cluttered landscape 16-20 Powell Gardens’ Conifer Garden: Circle Oak Ranch .................... An ACS Conifer Reference Garden 21-29 .................................. 2012 International Trip: .......................... The Netherlands and Belgium 30-33 ..... A Wasp’s Tale: The Search for Megastigmus .................... on North American Cupressaceae Powell Gardens 34-36 ........................................The Hibbard Broom, ........... the “VW Bug” Broom and ‘Wilson Park’, .......................................... Three Broom Stories 37-39 ..........The Beazie and Michael Larned Garden ..........................for the 2013 National Meeting 40-41 ............................................... Abies pinsapo International Trip 42 ................................ 2013 National Meeting 44-47 ....2012 Northeast Region Annual Meeting 48 ....................................................Directorate Larned Garden The purposes of the American Conifer Society are the development, conservation, and propagation of conifers, with an emphasis on those that are dwarf or unusual, standardization of nomenclature, and education
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Vegetation of the Zhetysu Alatau Mountains
    Dimeyeva et al.: Meadow vegetation - 375 - MEADOW VEGETATION OF THE ZHETYSU ALATAU MOUNTAINS DIMEYEVA, L. A.1* – SITPAYEVA, G. T.1 – USSEN, K.2 – ORLOVSKY, L.3 – ABLAIKHANOV, E.4 – ISLAMGULOVA, A. F.1 – ZHANG, Y.5 – ZHANG, J.5 – SULEIMENOVA, N. S.2 1Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan 2Department of Ecology, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan 3Ben-Gurion University of Negev, Sede Boqer, Israel 4Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan 5Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (phone: +7-727-3947642, fax: +7-727-3948040) (Received 28th Apr 2016; accepted 22nd Jul 2016) Abstract. The Zhetysu (Junggar) Alatau mountain system consists of mainly two parallel, high mountain ranges: the northern and the southern. The natural border between the ranges is the Koksu river and the Boro Tala river (located in China). Climate conditions, water resources, soil cover, altitudinal zonality of plant cover vary in the northern and the southern ranges (macro slopes). The aim of the research was to give phytocoenotic characteristic of meadow vegetation, to determine the ecological-physiognomic types of meadows, to identify the species composition of natural communities and indicators of anthropogenic influence. Meadow vegetation inhabits a wide altitudinal range from piedmont deserts and low-hill terrains to subalpine and alpine belts, with a high degree of species and phytocoenotic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Collection Policy for The
    Collection Policy for the Living Collection David Rae (Editor), Peter Baxter, David Knott, David Mitchell, David Paterson and Barry Unwin 3908_Coll_policy.indd 1 21/9/06 3:24:25 pm 2 | ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH COLLECTION POLICY FOR THE LIVING COLLECTION Contents Regius Keeper’s Foreword 3 Section IV Collection types 22 Introduction 22 Introduction 3 Conservation collections 22 PlantNetwork Target 8 project 24 Purpose, aims and objectives 3 Scottish Plant Project 25 International Conifer Conservation Programme 25 Section I National and international context, National Council for the Conservation of Plants stakeholders and user groups 4 and Gardens (NCCPG) 25 Off-site collections 26 National and international context 4 Convention on Biological Diversity 4 Heritage or historic plants, plant collections or Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 4 landscape features 27 Plant Diversity Challenge 5 British native plants International Agenda for Botanic Gardens in Scottish Plants Project (formerly known as the Conservation 6 Scottish Rare Plants Project) 29 Action Plan for the Botanic gardens in the European Union & Planta Europa 6 Section V Acquisition and transfer 30 Convention on Trade in Endangered species of Introduction 30 Wild Flora and Fauna 8 Fieldwork 30 Global warming/outside influences 8 Index Seminum 31 Stakeholders and user groups 9 Other seed and plant catalogues 31 Research and conservation 9 Acquisition 31 Education and teaching 10 Repatriation 32 Interpretation 10 Policy for the short to medium term storage Phenology 10
    [Show full text]