Theory of Literature a Compilation Series

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theory of Literature a Compilation Series Theory of Literature A Compilation Series https://id.pinterest.com Sarif Syamsu Rizal English Literature Study Program Faculty of Humanities Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang Theory of Literature A Compilation Series https://id.pinterest.com Sarif Syamsu Rizal English Literature Study Program Faculty of Humanities Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang ii Lesson Plan Semester : 5 Type of the course : classes Number of classes per week : 1 x 100 minutes Course completion requirements : written examination Course Description The course is organized around specific theoretical paradigms in Literature. The subject includes Introduction: What is Literary Theory?, Scientific Philosophic Discourse of Literature, Scope of Literature, Nature of Literature, Genre of Literature, Elements of Literary Work, Concept of Poetry, Concept of Prose, Complexity of Drama, Literary Movements, Critical Approaches of Literature, and Trinities in Discovering Meaning on Literature. Aims The main aim of the course is to provide students of English study program with knowledge and terminology of theoretical paradigms in literature in the seventh semester. The course offers for all students an important theoretical background for research in literature. In the course the students learn how different theories of literature have emerged as responses to particular issues in literature, in other theories of literature, and outside literature. The students learn to frame literary issues using concepts in literary theory. Relation to other courses Within the School's curriculum, Theory of Literature course is a relation of the course of English Poetry, English Prose, Poetry Appreciation, Prose Appreciation, Reseach Method of Literature, and Seminar on Literature during the year of study. Requirements Students are required to participate actively in class discussion and pass term tests. Credit requirements for the classes, and the details of the material covered during the classes may vary depending on the teacher. Teachers are obliged to provide all details of the examination and grading procedures at the beginning of the course. Semarang, 15 September 2018 The Compiler iii Table of Contents Lesson Plan....................................................................................................................... ii List of Contents................................................................................................................. iii Unit 1 Introduction: What is Literary Studies................................................................... 1 Unit 2 Scientific Philosophic Discourse of Literature........................................................ 3 Unit 3 Scope of Literature................................................................................................. 15 Unit 4 Nature of Literature............................................................................................... 17 Unit 5 Genre of Literature................................................................................................. 23 Unit 6 Elements of Literary Work..................................................................................... 26 Unit 7 Concept of Poetry.................................................................................................. 29 Unit 8 Concept of Prose.................................................................................................... 52 Unit 9 Complexity of Drama.............................................................................................. 55 Unit 10 Literary Movements............................................................................................. 62 Unit 11 Critical Approaches of Literature......................................................................... 64 Unit 12 Trinities in Discovering Menings of Literature..................................................... 75 iv Unit 1 Introduction What is Literary Theory and do we need to study it? By John Phillips It is possible, even now in the 21st century, to complete a degree course in Literature without doing any literary theory. You might do perfectly well—even emerge as a star in the firmament of literary study—without ever having to engage with any of the by now canonical areas of literary theory, like formalism, structuralism, post structuralism, psychoanalysis and deconstruction. You could even get by, with no damage at all to your credentials or to your understanding and appreciation of literature, without doing any Marxism or feminism. Literary study remains strong and identifiable in its own right and is composed today, just as it was 50, 100, 150 years ago (but not much further back than that), of all kinds of activities like editorial work, criticism, appreciation and commentary that cope quite well on their own grounds without any interference from what many students would recognize (with a groan) as theory. Literary Theory might, therefore, be considered as something over and above the normal requirements of literary study. In the least sanguine sense of this over and above, we might charge it with superfluity. It is quite unnecessary for us to study theories of literature in order to study literature. In another, more difficult sense (and here we are now beginning to actually do some theory), theory’s superfluity to the normal requirements for reading and studying literature has proved over the years to be a tremendously productive resource for more adventurous readers and thinkers. So much so that the field—no matter how independent of theory it remains—has nonetheless been transformed in all kinds of ways by the insistence of a certain dogged theorizing that just goes on whether we like it or not. So it would not be strictly necessary to take a course in Literary Theory. Against this, of course, many programs insist on a minimum requirement—a core course in literary theory, approaches to literature, critical theory, advanced critical reading—you find them everywhere, indicating more than anything else a sense of its importance for people who plan courses, guardians of institutions of literature who feel that without theory there is something not quite valid about a course. But (and here I’m going to get all theoretical again) taking a course in Literary Theory is often a frustrating experience and, as such, it would not necessarily be very theoretical. I mean if theory is read in certain ways then no theorizing on the part of the student goes on. Many people come into Literary Theory believing that there may be tools to pick up, methods to apply (more or less mechanically perhaps) that help to unlock the mysteries of the literary texts. In other words, despite recent history and the prevalence of courses introducing you to literary theory, there is no guarantee that Literary Theory will be produced. Oh, you can be sure that literary study, criticism, appreciation etc. will go on unimpeded but the peculiar experience of having taken a course in Literary Theory without it having made much sense and certainly not much difference to the way you read literature remains common. This is because Literary Theory needs to be regarded as a separate subject, independently of what goes on in the other areas of departments of literature, before it can be expected to change anything. The theory (or production of theories) of literature can be regarded as a specialized pursuit and those who choose to follow it often read it for its own intrinsic interest, not simply subordinating it to already extant ways of doing literary 1 appreciation, criticism and commentary. Only then does it begin to contribute to literary studies. (Taken from: https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/literarytheory.htm) 2 Unit 2 Sceintific Philosophic Discourse of Literature: Ontology, Axiology, and Epistemology on Literary Studies SCEINTIFIC PHILOSOPHIC DISCOURSE OF LITERATURE: ONTOLOGY, AXIOLOGY, AND EPISTEMOLOGY ON LITERARY STUDIES Sarif Syamsu Rizal Lecturer, English Study Program, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro – Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 2 November 2015 ABSTRACT One important reason of studying literature was to teach us about the world and other people, as well as to reflect history and to see the future. This paper was an alternative philosophical thought of understanding literature entitled “Scientific Philosophic Discourse of Literature: Ontology, Axiology, and Epistemology on Literary Studies”.Tthe objective was understanding of circumstantial interpretative about essence of object, target of benefit, and methodologies of literary studies systemically-systematically-comprehensively so that it could be useful as enrichment insight to study literature. Unit of analysis of this paper focused on the three aspects: ontological, axiological, and epistemological principality of literature as a product of science. Methods of this paper consist of descriptive-qualitative design in explaining the discourse, library research in collecting data, and shared-understanding by interpretative paradigm in answering the problem statement is that what the ontological, axiological, and epistemological principality of literary studies is. This paper examined the principalities of a science saying that there are three aspects which are reciprocal relevancy in process of scientific development. Those are ontological, axiological, and epistemological aspect in understanding literature. The contribution of this paper as the significant finding of the study and its implication
Recommended publications
  • Poetry That Expresses Thoughts and Emotions of a Single Speaker
    Type of writing done in verse form that Poetry uses figures of speech designed to appeal to emotions and imagination Poetry that expresses Lyric Poetry thoughts and emotions of a single speaker Poetry that tells a story Narrative Poetry Form and Structure Poem that is song-like; usually focuses Ballad on topics such as romance, adventure, and death; and tells a story Sonnet 14 line lyric poem A mourning poem; written for Elegy someone who has died Lyric poem on a serious subject; usually Ode addressed to one person or thing; often celebrates something a repeated sound, word, Refrain phrase, line, or group of lines Japanese 3 lined poem with 5 Haiku syllables in lines 1 and 3 and 7 syllables in line 2 Couplet two consecutive lines of poetry that rhyme Triplets Three lined stanza Quatrains 4 line stanzas poetry that doesn’t have a set Free Verse rhyme scheme or meter A very long narrative poem that tells of Epic the life and journeys of a hero A group of consecutive lines in a Stanza poem that forms a single unit; like paragraphs Figurative Language comparison between two unlike Simile things, using a word such as like, as, than, or resembles comparison between two unlike things that does not use a Metaphor connecting word a group of words not meant to Idiom be taken literally overstating something, usually Hyperbole for the purpose of creating a comic effect giving human characteristics to Personification an object or an animal contradictory elements (two Oxymoron things that do not belong together) use of language that appeals to Imagery
    [Show full text]
  • The Verse Dramas of TS Eliot
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1959 Search for form| the verse dramas of T. S. Eliot Carol Sue Rometch The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Rometch, Carol Sue, "Search for form| the verse dramas of T. S. Eliot" (1959). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3500. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3500 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SEARCH FOR FORM; THE VERSE DRAMAS OF T.S. ELIOT by CAROL SUE ROMETCH B.A. Whitman College, 1957 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1959 Approved by; GhfiHrman, Boàrd of Examiners Dean, Graduate School WAY 2 8 1959 Date UMI Number: EP35735 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ütaMitatton PlAMiing UMI EP35735 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Axel KRUSI;
    SYDNEY STUDIES Tragicomedy and Tragic Burlesque: Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead AxEL KRUSI; When Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead appeared at the .Old Vic theatre' in 1967, there was some suspicion that lack of literary value was one reason for the play's success. These doubts are repeated in the revised 1969 edition of John Russell Taylor's standard survey of recent British drama. The view in The Angry Theatre is that Stoppard lacks individuality, and that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is a pale imitation of the theatre of the absurd, wrillen in "brisk, informal prose", and with a vision of character and life which seems "a very small mouse to emerge from such an imposing mountain".l In contrast, Jumpers was received with considerable critical approval. Jumpers and Osborne's A Sense of Detachment and Storey's Life Class might seem to be evidence that in the past few years the new British drama has reached maturity as a tradition of dramatic forms aitd dramatic conventions which exist as a pattern of meaningful relationships between plays and audiences in particular theatres.2 Jumpers includes a group of philosophical acrobats, and in style and meaning seems to be an improved version of Stoppard's trans· lation of Beckett's theatre of the absurd into the terms of the conversation about the death of tragedy between the Player and Rosencrantz: Player Why, we grow rusty and you catch us at the very point of decadence-by this time tomorrow we might have forgotten every­ thing we ever knew.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphor-II Metaphor-II Contents: 10.1 Dead Metaphors 10.2 Conceptual
    Metaphor-II Linguistic Stylistics Metaphor-II Figures of Speech Paper Coordinator Prof. Ravinder Gargesh Module ID & Name Lings_P-LS10 Metaphor-II Content Writer Dr. V.P. Sharma Email id [email protected] Phone 9312254857 Contents: 10.1 Dead Metaphors 10.2 Conceptual Metaphor Theory 10.3 Extended Metaphor 10.4 Mixed Metaphor 10.5 Metaphor in Literary and Non-literary discourse 10.1 Dead Metaphors We have noted that a metaphor is characterized by linguistic deviation. This characteristic allows metaphor, particularly poetic metaphors, to create novel and original combinations of ideas, objects and sensations. But as they come into common use, the novelty wears off and there is no perception of semantic deviation. More significantly, they lose their iconicity: in ‘root cause of the problem’ or ‘heated argument’, the original metaphor has lost its figurative ‘charge’; ‘root cause of a problem’ is simply the ‘fundamental reason for the occurrence of the problem’, and ‘heated argument ‘ is another expression for ‘angry exchange of words’. Such metaphors are dead metaphors. But metaphors never really die. The metaphors that ‘die’ in poetic language come to ‘live’ in ordinary language. The habit of words to extend their meaning by metaphor and then cease to be metaphorical is a fact of language. It further allows metaphors to be used to fill gaps in vocabulary: leg of a table, wings of a building, clock hands, World Wide Web, crashing or hanging (as in computer hangs), surf, crash course. In such cases of metaphorical extensions, there are no literal substitutes for these expressions. This is true of all languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Literary Analysis
    Creating Literary Analysis v. 1.0 This is the book Creating Literary Analysis (v. 1.0). This book is licensed under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/) license. See the license for more details, but that basically means you can share this book as long as you credit the author (but see below), don't make money from it, and do make it available to everyone else under the same terms. This book was accessible as of December 29, 2012, and it was downloaded then by Andy Schmitz (http://lardbucket.org) in an effort to preserve the availability of this book. Normally, the author and publisher would be credited here. However, the publisher has asked for the customary Creative Commons attribution to the original publisher, authors, title, and book URI to be removed. Additionally, per the publisher's request, their name has been removed in some passages. More information is available on this project's attribution page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/attribution.html?utm_source=header). For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/). You can browse or download additional books there. ii Table of Contents About the Authors................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................. 2 Dedications............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Forms-The Epic
    Literary Forms-The Epic Dr.M.K.Praseeda Assistant Professor Department of English(Aided) The Epic • The Epic Defined:- • 1. Long narrative poem heroic personages of history or tradition. • 2. Tale in verse • Epic of Growth and Epic of Art:- • Epic is divided into two classes (1) The Epic of Growth or Authentic Epic or folk Epic. (2) The literary Epic or Epic of Art. • Authentic Epic is not the work of one man. • It is the collection of a series of folk songs and legends. • The literary Epic is the work of one individual genius • The old English epic “Beowulf”, Homer’s ‘Iliad’ is odyssey are Authentic Epics. • Vergil’s “Aeneid” and Milton’s paradise Lost” Literary Epic. Qualities of an epic:- • High seriousness. • Comprehensiveness. • Characterized by greatness of scope and majesty. • There is room four very great variety. • The action of epic is spacious. • Inclusiveness is another characteristic of an epic. • The characters are gods to ordinary mortals. • Its scenic background changes frequently. • Its takes long time. • The events therein range from the earth. • Choric aspect is a characteristic of an epic, which is mentioned by profession Tillyard. • Epic must express the spirit of an age or nation and not merely the feelings and experiences of individuals. • Homes expresses the admiration of the people of his time for the heroic qualities. • An epic poet has the consciousness of being a prophet of his time. The Convention in the Epic:- • (a) The theme of the Epic, is stated in the first few lines • The prayer and the ‘innovation’. • (b) Introduction of smilies in the Homeric manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginian Writers Fugitive Verse
    VIRGIN IAN WRITERS OF FUGITIVE VERSE VIRGINIAN WRITERS FUGITIVE VERSE we with ARMISTEAD C. GORDON, JR., M. A., PH. D, Assistant Proiesso-r of English Literature. University of Virginia I“ .‘ '. , - IV ' . \ ,- w \ . e. < ~\ ,' ’/I , . xx \ ‘1 ‘ 5:" /« .t {my | ; NC“ ‘.- ‘ '\ ’ 1 I Nor, \‘ /" . -. \\ ' ~. I -. Gil-T 'J 1’: II. D' VI. Doctor: .. _ ‘i 8 » $9793 Copyrighted 1923 by JAMES '1‘. WHITE & C0. :To MY FATHER ARMISTEAD CHURCHILL GORDON, A VIRGINIAN WRITER OF FUGITIVE VERSE. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. The thanks of the author are due to the following publishers, editors, and individuals for their kind permission to reprint the following selections for which they hold copyright: To Dodd, Mead and Company for “Hold Me Not False” by Katherine Pearson Woods. To The Neale Publishing Company for “1861-1865” by W. Cabell Bruce. To The Times-Dispatch Publishing Company for “The Land of Heart‘s Desire” by Thomas Lomax Hunter. To The Curtis Publishing Company for “The Lane” by Thomas Lomax Hunter (published in The Saturday Eve- ning Post, and copyrighted, 1923, by the Curtis Publishing 00.). To the Johnson Publishing Company for “Desolate” by Fanny Murdaugh Downing (cited from F. V. N. Painter’s Poets of Virginia). To Harper & Brothers for “A Mood” and “A Reed Call” by Charles Washington Coleman. To The Independent for “Life’s Silent Third”: by Charles Washington Coleman. To the Boston Evening Transcript for “Sister Mary Veronica” by Nancy Byrd Turner. To The Century for “Leaves from the Anthology” by Lewis Parke Chamberlayne and “Over the Sea Lies Spain” by Charles Washington Coleman. To Henry Holt and Company for “Mary‘s Dream” by John Lowe and “To Pocahontas” by John Rolfe.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry As Correspondence in Early Modern England
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England Dianne Marie Mitchell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Recommended Citation Mitchell, Dianne Marie, "Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2477. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2477 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2477 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England Abstract This project recovers a forgotten history of Renaissance poetry as mail. At a time when trends in English print publication and manuscript dissemination were making lyric verse more accessible to a reading public than ever before, writers and correspondents created poetic objects designed to reach individual postal recipients. Drawing on extensive archival research, “Unfolding Verse” examines versions of popular poems by John Donne, Ben Jonson, Mary Wroth, and others which look little like “literature.” Rather, these verses bear salutations, addresses, folds, wax seals, and other signs of transmission through the informal postal networks of early modern England. Neither verse letters nor “epistles,” the textual artifacts I call “letter-poems” proclaim their participation in a widespread social
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Theoretical Framework in This
    ADLN Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Theoretical Framework In this chapter, the writer will explain about the theory which is applied to analyze Rabbit Hole play as the chosen literary work in this study. Regarding the statement of the problem, the theory which is used in this study is New Criticism; which means the approach based only on the text itself. Besides explaining about New Criticism as the main theory and several formal elements such as characterization, plot, symbol, and also the theme which is the main idea of the story, this chapter also contains related studies with the similar issue that can support this study. There will be three related studies for this study that will be discussed in the end of this chapter. First, the writer will explain about the main theory; that is New Criticism. New Criticism is an approach which focuses on the text itself to find the meaning of a literary work. New Criticism refuses to pay attention to the external factors such as author’s background, reader’s response, and another factor which is not merely about the text of literary work. According to Tyson, the external factors such as author’s background cannot always be a guide to provide information to analyze a literary work (Tyson 136), because New Criticism focuses only on the text, Skripsi BECCA’S SURVIVAL ATTEMPT AFTER THE DEATH OF HER BELOVEDLUTFITA MAUDY PRASTIKASARI SON IN DAVID LINDSAY-ABAIRE’S RABBIT HOLE: A NEW CRITICISM STUDY ADLN Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga the validity of the text meaning is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology and Poetry: an Introduction Michael R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2006 Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction Michael R. Hill University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction" (2006). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 356. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/356 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R. 2006. “Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction.” Sociological Origins 4 (Spring): 66-68. THE SOCIOLOGY OF POETRY: A SYMPOSIUM Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction 1 Michael R. Hill OETRY IS A SOCIOLOGICAL REALITY. It has an institutional location within society, plays an important part in everyday social interaction, and promises very real results as a site Pfor conceiving and explicating alternative social constellations. Simultaneously, poetry is sometimes difficult to grasp by those of decidedly a prosaic bent, and this includes too many sociologists. As poetry shapes — and is in turn shaped by — the active
    [Show full text]
  • Image of Women in Jamil Butsainah Poetry
    Image of Women in Jamil Butsainah Poetry M. Faisol1, Akhmad Muzakki1 and M. Anwar Mas’adi1 1Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Keywords: Jamil Bustaina, Literature, Women Abstract: Jahiliyah Arabic literature shows high interest in women as objects that must be discussed. Women do not just have aesthetic values, but also become a lure of extraordinary love. Through Alan Swingewood's literary sociology theory, this paper shows that rural background (Baduwi) influenced Jamil's poems against Butsainah. So the picture obtained is a picture of the beauty of Butsainah, a description of the weakness of Arab women's thinking and a picture of pure Arabian women’s love. 1 INTRODUCTION perpetuate faithful activities that they do, including representing their views on themselves and the world Until now, women are often seen as weak. They are around them. always identified with a person who is more In relation to women, jahiliyah Arabic literature (especially poetry) shows high interest in women as emotional than reason. As a result, they are only understood as beings who dwell on domestic matters objects that must be discussed. In Imri 'al-Qais and are not worthy to play a role in the public world. poems, for example, women have been portrayed as extraordinary charmers of love. Likewise, the poems As a result, stereotypes arise against women as a person who accompanies men; they become of Jamil Butsainah portray women as being more than marginalized people (Boiko, Anderson, and Gordon, anything; without which the world will die. Considering that almost every jahiliyah Arabic 2017; Coughlan, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • References.Pdf
    REFERENCES (References to primary articles examined in chapters 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 are provided in end-of-chapter reference lists and appendices or are mentioned in passing within the text.) Abt, Helmut A. “Some Trends in American Astronomical Publications.” Publica- tions of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 93 (1981): 269-73. Agassi, Joseph. Faraday as a Natural Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2. Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1960. Aristotle. Rhetoric. Tr. Lane Cooper. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1932. Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962. Bacon, Francis. The Advancement of Learning. London, 1603. Bacon, Francis. Magna Instauratio. London, 1620. Bachelard, G. Le Materialisme Rationnel. Paris: PUF, 1953. Baddam. Memoirs of the Royal Society, vol. 1. London, 1738. Baldauf, R. B., and B. H. Jernudd. “Language of Publications as a Variable in Scientific Communication.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 6 (1983): 97-108. Barnes, Barry, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974, Barnes, Barry, and Steven Shapin. Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979. Barnes, Sherman B. “The Editing of Early Learned Journals.” Osiris I (1936): 155-72. Bazerman, Charles. “How Natural Philosophers Can Cooperate.” In Text and Profession, ed. Bazerman and Paradis, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, forthcoming. Bazerman, Charles. The Informed Writer. 3d edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989. Bazerman, Charles. “Scientific Writing as a Social Act.” In New Essays in Tech- nical Writing and Communication, ed.
    [Show full text]