DOCSLIB.ORG

Weight-Length Summaries for Western Australian Fish Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weight-Length Summaries for Western Australian Fish Species Fisheries Research Report No. 278 Weight-length summaries for Western Australian fish species derived from surveys of recreational fishers at boat ramps C.B. Smallwood, A. Tate and K.L. Ryan October 2018 8562 /15 Correct citation: Smallwood CB, Tate A, Ryan KL 2018. Weight-length summaries for Western Australian fish species derived from surveys of recreational fishers at boat ramps. Fisheries Research Report No. 278, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia. 151pp. Enquiries: WA Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920 Tel: +61 8 9203 0111 Email: [email protected] Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au A complete list of Fisheries Research Reports is available online at www.fish.wa.gov.au Important disclaimer The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Gordon Stephenson House 140 William Street PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 6551 4444 Website: dpird.wa.gov.au ABN: 18 951 343 745 ISSN: 1035-4549 (Print) ISBN: 978-1-921258-10-7 (Print) ISSN: 2202-5758 (Online) ISBN: 978-1-921258-11-4 (Online) Copyright © Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, 2018. First revision. 1681/18 ii Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 278 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................ 3 2 Survey Design and Analysis ....................................................................... 5 2.1 Biological Surveys ................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 2011/12 ........................................................................................................ 6 2.1.2 2013/14 ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1.3 2015/16 ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Analysis ................................................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 Weight-Length Relationships .................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Fork Length-Total Length Relationships .................................................. 14 2.2.3 Average Total Length ............................................................................... 14 2.2.4 Average Weight ........................................................................................ 14 3 Results ........................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Estuarine .............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.1 Black Bream (Acanthopagrus butcheri) ................................................... 17 3.1.2 Southern Bluespotted Flathead (Platycephalus speculator) ..................... 18 3.1.3 Yellowtail Flathead (Platycephalus westraliae) ....................................... 19 3.1.4 Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) ................................................................... 19 3.1.5 Estuary Cobbler (Cnidoglanis macrocephalus) ........................................ 19 3.2 Nearshore ............................................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 Australian Herring (Arripis georgianus) ................................................... 20 3.2.2 Western Australian Salmon (Arripis truttaceus) ....................................... 21 3.2.3 Garfish (Hyporhamphus melanochir and Hemiramphus robustus) .......... 22 3.2.4 Tailor (Pomatomus saltatrix) .................................................................... 23 3.2.5 Blue Threadfin (Eleutheronema tetradactylum) ....................................... 24 3.2.6 King George Whiting (Sillaginodes punctata) ......................................... 25 3.2.7 School Whiting (Sillago bassensis, vittata and schomburgkii) ................. 26 3.2.8 Western Trumpeter Whiting (Sillago burrus) ........................................... 27 3.2.9 Mangrove Jack (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) ............................................ 28 3.2.10 Silver Trevally (Pseudocaranx dentex and P. wrighti) ............................. 29 3.2.11 Western Butterfish (Pentapodus vitta) ...................................................... 30 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 278 iii 3.2.12 Western Yellowfin Bream (Acanthopagrus morrisoni) ............................ 31 3.2.13 Western King Wrasse (Coris auricularis) ................................................ 32 3.2.14 Brownspotted Wrasse (Notolabrus parilus) .............................................. 33 3.3 Inshore Demersal ................................................................................................ 34 3.3.1 Baldchin Groper (Choerodon rubescens) ................................................. 34 3.3.2 Bight Redfish (Centroberyx gerrardi) ...................................................... 35 3.3.3 Blue Morwong (Nemadactylus valenciennesi) ......................................... 36 3.3.4 Bluespotted Emperor (Lethrinus punctulatus) .......................................... 37 3.3.5 Brownstripe Snapper (Lutjanus vitta) ....................................................... 37 3.3.6 Goldband Snapper (Pristipomoides multidens) ........................................ 38 3.3.7 Pink Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) ........................................................ 39 3.3.8 Rankin Cod (Epinephelus multinotatus) ................................................... 40 3.3.9 Red Emperor (Lutjanus sebae) .................................................................. 41 3.3.10 Spangled Emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus) ................................................. 42 3.3.11 West Australian Dhufish (Glaucosoma hebraicum) ................................. 43 3.3.12 Barcheek Coral Trout (Plectropomus maculatus) ..................................... 44 3.3.13 Common Coral Trout (Plectropomus leopardus) ..................................... 45 3.3.14 Breaksea Cod (Epinephelides armatus) .................................................... 46 3.3.15 Grass Emperor (Lethrinus laticaudis) ....................................................... 47 3.3.16 Redthroat Emperor (Lethrinus miniatus) .................................................. 48 3.3.17 Stripey Snapper (Lutjanus carponotatus) ................................................. 49 3.4 Offshore Demersal .............................................................................................. 50 3.4.1 Eightbar Grouper (Hyporthodus octofasciatus) ........................................ 50 3.4.2 Hapuku (Polyprion oxygeneios) ................................................................ 51 3.4.3 Ruby Snapper (Etelis carbunculus) .......................................................... 51 3.5 Pelagic .................................................................................................................. 52 3.5.1 Spanish Mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson) ..................................... 52 3.5.2 Samsonfish (Seriola hippos) ..................................................................... 53 3.5.3 Grey Mackerel (Scomberomorus semifasciatus) ...................................... 54 3.5.4 Blue Mackerel (Scomber australasicus) ................................................... 54 3.5.5 Yellowtail Scad (Trachurus novaezelandiae) ........................................... 55 3.5.6 Southern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) ............................................. 56 3.6 Sharks ................................................................................................................... 57 3.6.1 Whaler Sharks (Family Carcharhinidae) ................................................... 57 3.6.2 Gummy Sharks (Mustelus antarcticus and M. stevensi) ........................... 57 3.6.3 Wobbegong (Family Orectolobidae) ......................................................... 57 3.7 Crustaceans.......................................................................................................... 58 iv Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 278 3.7.1 Western Rock Lobster (Panulirus cygnus) ............................................... 58 3.7.2 Mud Crab (Scylla olivacea and S. serrata) ............................................... 59 3.7.3 Blue Swimmer Crab (Portunus armatus) ................................................. 60 3.8 Molluscs................................................................................................................ 61 3.8.1 Abalone (Haliotis spp.) ............................................................................. 61 3.9 Cephalopods ........................................................................................................ 62 3.9.1 Squid (Order Teuthoidea)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Ecosystem Stability for Kelp Beds in Urban Environments
    Mechanisms of ecosystem stability for kelp beds in urban environments By Simon E Reeves November 2017 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies I DECLARATIONS This declaration certifies that: (i) This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. (ii) The work contained in this thesis, except where otherwise acknowledged, is the result of my own investigations. (iii) Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used (iv) The thesis is less than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 Statement of authority of access This thesis may be available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 II 20/7/18 ABSTRACT Ecologists have long been interested in determining the role biotic relationships play in natural systems. Even Darwin envisioned natural systems as "bound together by a web of complex relations”, noting how “complex and unexpected are the checks and relations between organic beings” (On the Origin of Species, 1859, pp 81-83). Any event or phenomenon that alters the implicit balance in the web of interactions, to any degree, can potentially facilitate a re-organisation in structure that can lead to a wholescale change to the stability of a natural system. As a result of the increasing diversity and intensity of anthropogenic stressors on ecosystems, previously well-understood biotic interactions and emergent ecological functions are being altered, requiring a reappraisal of their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade
    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Growth of the Spiny Lobsters Panulirus Gracilis and Panulirus Inflatus (Decapoda: Palinuridae) in Guerrero, México
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 51(1): 165-174, 2003 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Factors affecting growth of the spiny lobsters Panulirus gracilis and Panulirus inflatus (Decapoda: Palinuridae) in Guerrero, México Patricia Briones-Fourzán and Enrique Lozano-Álvarez Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica Puerto Morelos. P. O. Box 1152, Cancún, Q. R. 77500 México. Fax: +52 (998) 871-0138; [email protected] Received 00-XX-2002. Corrected 00-XX-2002. Accepted 00-XX-2002. Abstract: The effects of sex, injuries, season and site on the growth of the spiny lobsters Panulirus gracilis, and P. inflatus, were studied through mark-recapture techniques in two sites with different ecological characteristics on the coast of Guerrero, México. Panulirus gracilis occurred in both sites, whereas P. inflatus occurred only in one site. All recaptured individuals were adults. Both species had similar intermolt periods, but P. gracilis had significantly higher growth rates (mm carapace length week-1) than P. inflatus as a result of a larger molt incre- ment. Growth rates of males were higher than those of females in both species owing to larger molt increments and shorter intermolt periods in males. Injuries had no effect on growth rates in either species. Individuals of P. gracilis grew faster in site 1 than in site 2. Therefore, the effect of season on growth of P. gracilis was analyzed separately in each site. In site 2, growth rates of P. gracilis were similar in summer and in winter, whereas in site 1 both species had higher growth rates in winter than in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY on KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program
    2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources ManagementDate2007 Board Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board REEF FISH BIODIVERSITYKangaroo Island Natural ON Resources KANGAROO Management ISLAND Board SEAGRASS FAUNAL BIODIVERSITYREPORT TITLE ON KI Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 1 REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY ON KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program A report prepared for the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board by Daniel Brock Martine Kinloch December 2007 Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 2 Oceans of Blue The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. The Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. Project Officer Contact Details Martine Kinloch Coast and Marine Program Manager Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4312 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Contact Details Jeanette Gellard General Manager PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4340 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] © Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board.
    [Show full text]
  • (2014), Volume 2, Issue 8, 301-306
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 8, 301-306 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Checklist of Fishes from Interu Mangrove Swamp of River Krishna Estuarine Region Andhra Pradesh, India Madhusudhana Rao, K* and Krishna, P.V. Acharya Nagarjuna University, Dept. of Zoology and Aquaculture, Nagarjuna Nagar- 522 510, India. Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: Interu mangrove swamp is located in the North Eastern part of River Krishna estuary. In the present study 60 species of 47 genera, 29 families and 6 orders Received: 15 June 2014 Final Accepted: 19 July 2014 of fish were recorded form the swamp. Order Perciformes is the dominant Published Online: August 2014 whereas Gonorynchiformes, Siluriformes and Beloniformes are least representation. Of which one species each, represented to Vulnerable (VU); Key words: Near Threatened (NT); Data Deficient (DD) while 39 species Not Evaluated Krishna estuary, Mangrove swamp, (NE) and 17 species Least Concern (LC) from the Interu mangrove swamp. Fishes, IUCN status *Corresponding Author Copy Right, IJAR, 2014,. All rights reserved Madhusudhana Rao, K Introduction River Krishna is one of the largest perennial rivers in east coast of India (next to River Godavari), originating from the Deccan plateau flowing eastwards and opening in the Bay of Bengal near Machilipatnam in Andhra Pradesh. Krishna estuarine system cover an area of 320 Km2 of which mangrove extends over an area of 25,000 ha which representing 5.13% of India and 42.9% of Andhra Pradesh state mangrove area (Krishna and Rao, 2011). In the Krishna estuarine region, Interu mangrove swamp located in the North Eastern part and extends over an area of 1079 ha covering 560 ha mangrove vegetation (MadhusudhanaRao, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Faunal Assemblages and Habitat Types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia
    Relationships between faunal assemblages and habitat types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia Submitted by James Richard Tweedley This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 B.Sc (Hons) University of Portsmouth (UK) MRes University of Plymouth (UK) Declaration I declare that the information contained in this thesis is the result of my own research unless otherwise cited, and has as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any university. __________________________________________ James Richard Tweedley Shifting Sands: The sand bar at the mouth of Broke Inlet in (top) summer and (bottom) winter 2008. Bottom photo by Bryn Farmer. Abstract The work for this thesis was undertaken in Broke Inlet, a seasonally-open estuary on the south coast of Western Australia and the only estuary in that region which is regarded as “near-pristine” (Commonwealth of Australia, 2002). The only previous seasonal studies of the environmental and biotic characteristics of this estuary involved broad-based descriptions of the trends in salinity, temperature and ichthyofaunal characteristics at a limited number of sites. Furthermore, no attempt has been made to identify statistically the range of habitats present in the nearshore and offshore waters of this system, and the extents to which the characteristics of the fish and benthic invertebrate faunas are related to habitat type. These types of data provide not only reliable inventories of the habitat and faunal characteristics of Broke Inlet, but also a potential basis for predicting the likely impact of anthropogenic and climatic changes in Broke Inlet in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Cretaceous Acanthomorph from Canada 15 February 2016, by Sarah Gibson
    A new species of Cretaceous acanthomorph from Canada 15 February 2016, by Sarah Gibson to sit flush along the body, helping the fish swim faster by reducing drag, or they can be extended completely out to act as a defense mechanism, in case you are a predator looking for a quick bite. Near the base of the Acanthomorpha phylogenetic tree is a small group of fishes, Polymixiiformes, comprised of a single living genus, Polymixia, more commonly known as the beardfish. This innocuous fish seems harmless, but according to many ichthyologists, Polymixia is just one key to understanding acanthomorph relationships. Unraveling the evolutionary relationships is difficult with a single living genus, but thankfully, polymixiiforms have a fossil record dating back to the Cretaceous, containing an increasing number of taxa as new discoveries are being made, particularly in deposits in North America, where fewer acanthomorph fossils are known compared to Figuring out fish relationships is no small feat. Credit: the more-studied Eastern Tethys Ocean deposits in Near et al. 2013 Europe. For being one of the largest groups of vertebrates, and having one of the richer fossil records among organisms, the relationships of fishes are still hotly debated. Humongous datasets are being compiled that involve molecular (both nuclear and mitochondrial) data, compared and contrasted with thorough morphological analyses. (I'm not going to get into all of it here, simply because of its sheer complexity.) What I am going to get into, however, is the fossil record of one subset of fishes, the acanthomorphs. The stout beardfish, Polymixia nobilis. Credit: Wikipedia Acanthomorphs are teleost fishes that possess true fin spines: a set of prominent, sharp, unsegmented spines in the front portion of their dorsal and/or anal fins, followed by a portion of One such new species was recently described by pliable, segmented, "softer" looking rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Fish Diversity of Tamil Nadu, India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (10), October 2017, pp. 1968-1985 Estuarine fish diversity of Tamil Nadu, India H.S. Mogalekar*, J. Canciyal#, P. Jawahar, D.S. Patadiya, C. Sudhan, P. Pavinkumar, Prateek, S. Santhoshkumar & A. Subburaj Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College & Research Institute, (Tamil Nadu Fisheries University), Thoothukudi-628 008, India. #ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India. *[E-Mail: [email protected]] Received 04 February 2016 ; revised 10 August 2017 Systematic and updated checklist of estuarine fishes contains 330 species distributed under 205 genera, 95 families, 23 orders and two classes. The most diverse order was perciformes with 175 species, 100 genera and 43 families. The top four families with the highest number of species were gobidae (28 species), carangidae (23 species), engraulidae (15 species) and lutjanidae (14 species). Conservation status of all taxa includes one species as endangered, five species as vulnerable, 14 near threatened, 93 least concern and 16 data deficient. As numbers of commercial, sports, ornamental and cultivable fishes are high, commercial and recreational fishing could be organized. Seed production by selective breeding is recommended for aquaculture practices in estuarine areas of Tamil Nadu. [Keywords: Estuarine fishes, updated checklist, fishery and conservation status, Tamil Nadu] Introduction significant component of coastal ecosystem due to The total estuarine area of Tamil Nadu their immense biodiversity values in aquatic was estimated to be 56000 ha, which accounts ecology. The fish fauna inhabiting the estuarine 3.88 % of the total estuarine area of India 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﻴﺶ ﭘﻮزه دراز ( Carangoides Chrysophrys) در آﺑﻬﺎي اﺳﺘﺎن ﻫﺮﻣﺰﮔﺎن
    A study on some biological aspects of longnose trevally (Carangoides chrysophrys) in Hormozgan waters Item Type monograph Authors Kamali, Easa; Valinasab, T.; Dehghani, R.; Behzadi, S.; Darvishi, M.; Foroughfard, H. Publisher Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute Download date 10/10/2021 04:51:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/40061 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﺞﻛﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر – ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻜﺪه اﻛﻮﻟﻮژي ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎرس و درﻳﺎي ﻋﻤﺎن ﻋﻨﻮان: ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ از وﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي زﻳﺴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﻴﺶ ﭘﻮزه دراز ( Carangoides chrysophrys) در آﺑﻬﺎي اﺳﺘﺎن ﻫﺮﻣﺰﮔﺎن ﻣﺠﺮي: ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺷﻤﺎره ﺛﺒﺖ 49023 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﭻ ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر- ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻜﺪه اﻛﻮﻟﻮژي ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎرس و درﻳﺎي ﻋﻤﺎن ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﺮوژه : ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ از وﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي زﻳﺴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﻴﺶ ﭘﻮزه دراز (Carangoides chrysophrys) در آﺑﻬﺎي اﺳﺘﺎن ﻫﺮﻣﺰﮔﺎن ﺷﻤﺎره ﻣﺼﻮب ﭘﺮوژه : 2-75-12-92155 ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪه/ ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪﮔﺎن : ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي ﻣﺴﺌﻮل ( اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮوژه ﻫﺎ و ﻃﺮﺣﻬﺎي ﻣﻠﻲ و ﻣﺸﺘﺮك دارد ) : ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي / ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎن : ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎر(ان) : ﺳﻴﺎﻣﻚ ﺑﻬﺰادي ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ دروﻳﺸﻲ، ﺣﺠﺖ اﷲ ﻓﺮوﻏﻲ ﻓﺮد، ﺗﻮرج وﻟﻲﻧﺴﺐ، رﺿﺎ دﻫﻘﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺸﺎور(ان) : - ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ(ان) : - ﻣﺤﻞ اﺟﺮا : اﺳﺘﺎن ﻫﺮﻣﺰﮔﺎن ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ ﺷﺮوع : 92/10/1 ﻣﺪت اﺟﺮا : 1 ﺳﺎل و 6 ﻣﺎه ﻧﺎﺷﺮ : ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ اﻧﺘﺸﺎر : ﺳﺎل 1395 ﺣﻖ ﭼﺎپ ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ اﺳﺖ . ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ، ﺗﺼﺎوﻳﺮ ، ﺟﺪاول ، ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻫﺎ و ﻧﻤﻮدارﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ذﻛﺮ ﻣﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻼﻣﺎﻧﻊ اﺳﺖ . «ﺳﻮاﺑﻖ ﻃﺮح ﻳﺎ ﭘﺮوژه و ﻣﺠﺮي ﻣﺴﺌﻮل / ﻣﺠﺮي» ﭘﺮوژه : ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ از وﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي زﻳﺴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﻴﺶ ﭘﻮزه دراز ( Carangoides chrysophrys) در آﺑﻬﺎي اﺳﺘﺎن ﻫﺮﻣﺰﮔﺎن ﻛﺪ ﻣﺼﻮب : 2-75-12-92155 ﺷﻤﺎره ﺛﺒﺖ (ﻓﺮوﺳﺖ) : 49023 ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ : 94/12/28 ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ اﺟﺮاﻳﻲ ﺟﻨﺎب آﻗﺎي ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻲ داراي ﻣﺪرك ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺎرﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ارﺷﺪ در رﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮژي ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺎن درﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrhitidae 3321
    click for previous page Perciformes: Percoidei: Cirrhitidae 3321 CIRRHITIDAE Hawkfishes by J.E. Randall iagnostic characters: Oblong fishes (size to about 30 cm), body depth 2 to 4.6 times in standard Dlength. A fringe of cirri on posterior edge of anterior nostril. Two indistinct spines on opercle. A row of canine teeth in jaws, the longest usually anteriorly in upper jaw and half-way back on lower jaw; a band of villiform teeth inside the canines, broader anteriorly (in lower jaw only anteriorly). One or more cirri projecting from tips of interspinous membranes of dorsal fin. Dorsal fin continuous, with X spines and 11 to 17 soft rays, notched between spinous and soft portions; anal fin with III spines and 5 to 7 (usually 6) soft rays; pectoral fins with 14 rays, the lower 5 to 7 rays unbranched and usually enlarged, with the membranes deeply incised; pelvic fins with I spine and 5 soft rays. Principal caudal-fin rays 15. Branchiostegal rays 6. Scales cycloid. Swimbladder absent. Vertebrae 26. Colour: variable with species. cirri lower pectoral-fin rays thickened and unbranched Remarks: The hawkfish family consists of 10 genera and 38 species, 33 of which occur in the Indo-Pacific region; 19 species are found in the Western Central Pacific. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Cirrhitids are bottom-dwelling fishes of coral reefs or rocky substrata; the majority occur in shallow water. They use their thickened lower pectoral-fin rays to wedge themselves in position in areas subject to surge. All species are carnivorous, feeding mainly on benthic crustaceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]