Self-Perpetuating Epigenetic Pili Switches in Bacteria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Self-Perpetuating Epigenetic Pili Switches in Bacteria Colloquium Self-perpetuating epigenetic pili switches in bacteria Aaron Hernday*, Margareta Krabbe†, Bruce Braaten*, and David Low*‡ *Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93117; and †Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden Bacteria have developed an epigenetic phase variation mechanism three helical turns apart which control transcription at the papBA to control cell surface pili–adhesin complexes between heritable promoter. Two DNA GATC sites designated GATCprox and expression (phase ON) and nonexpression (phase OFF) states. In GATCdist (proximal and distal with respect to the papBA the pyelonephritis-associated pili (pap) system, global regulators promoter) are located within Lrp binding sites 2 and 5, respec- [catabolite gene activator protein (CAP), leucine-responsive regu- tively. DNA GATC sites are target sites for Dam, which methy- latory protein (Lrp), DNA adenine methylase (Dam)] and local lates the adenosine of the GATC sequence. regulators (PapI and PapB) control phase switching. Lrp binds Mutational analyses showed that disruption of Lrp binding cooperatively to three pap DNA binding sites, sites 1–3, proximal sites 2 or 3 resulted in a higher OFF to ON switch rate or a phase to the papBA pilin promoter in phase OFF cells, whereas Lrp is locked ON phenotype, respectively. In contrast, disruption of bound to sites 4–6 distal to papBA in phase ON cells. Two Dam Lrp sites 4 or 5 resulted in a phase locked OFF phenotype (Fig. methylation targets, GATCprox and GATCdist, are located in Lrp 1) (8). These results suggested that binding of Lrp proximal to binding sites 2 and 5, respectively. In phase OFF cells, binding of Lrp at sites 1–3 inhibits methylation of GATCprox, forming the phase the papBAp promoter inhibits transcription whereas binding of OFF DNA methylation pattern (GATCdist methylated, GATCprox Lrp at the distal site activates transcription. In vitro DNA nonmethylated). Binding of Lrp at sites 1–3 blocks pap pili tran- footprint analyses indicated that Lrp binds with highest affinity scription and reduces the affinity of Lrp for sites 4–6. Together to Lrp sites 1–3, and with lower affinity to sites 4–6 (8–10). with methylation of GATCdist, which inhibits Lrp binding at sites Insertion or deletion of a single base pair between Lrp binding 4–6, the phase OFF state is maintained. We hypothesize that sites 1 and 2 locks transcription in the ON phase, consistent with transition to the phase ON state requires DNA replication to the observation that proper spacing between Lrp binding sites is dissociate Lrp and generate a hemimethyated GATCdist site. PapI necessary for the high cooperativity in binding (N. Kozak and and methylation of GATCprox act together to increase the affinity D.L., unpublished results). Examination of the pap DNA meth- of Lrp for sites 4–6. Binding of Lrp at the distal sites protects ylation patterns showed that, in phase OFF cells, GATCprox is GATCdist from methylation, forming the phase ON methylation nonmethylated and GATCdist is methylated, whereas the con- pattern (GATCdist nonmethyated, GATCprox methylated). Lrp bind- verse pattern exists in phase ON cells (GATCdist nonmethylated, ing at sites 4–6 together with cAMP-CAP binding 215.5 bp up- GATCprox methylated) (Fig. 2). These methylation patterns stream of the papBA transcription start, is required for activation depend on Lrp (9, 11, 12). Moreover, addition of Lrp to pap of pilin transcription. The first gene product of the papBA tran- DNA in vitro blocks methylation of the pap regulatory GATC script, PapB, helps maintain the switch in the ON state by activating sequences (12). Together, these data indicate that in phase OFF papI transcription, which in turn maintains Lrp binding at sites 4–6. cells Lrp is bound at sites 1–3, blocking methylation of GATCprox within site 2. In contrast, Lrp bound to sites 4–6 in phase ON Cis- and Trans-Acting Pap Switch Components cells blocks methylation of GATCdist within site 5 (Fig. 2). acteria have developed phase variation mechanisms to con- Translocation of Lrp from sites 1–3 to sites 4–6 requires PapI. Btrol cell surface pili–adhesin complexes between expression Lrp thus plays dual roles in regulating pap transcription. Lrp acts (phase ON) and nonexpression (phase OFF) states. Pili phase as a repressor when bound proximal to the pap BA pilin variation can occur by site specific (1, 2) and homologous promoter. Lrp activates pilin transcription when, together with recombination (3) mechanisms. In addition, a large group of pili PapI, it is bound distal to the pilin promoter (13). Activation of operons including pyelonephritis-associated pili (pap) are regu- pap transcription also requires binding of cAMP-CAP at a site lated by an epigenetic switch directly controlled by DNA meth- 60 bp upstream of Lrp binding site 4 (14–16) and binding of the ylation pattern formation (4, 5). The focus of this paper is on the papI mechanisms by which the phase OFF and phase ON states are PapB regulatory protein at a site proximal to the promoter perpetuated, the transition between phase OFF and phase ON (17, 18) (Fig. 1). states, and the external inputs that control phase switching. Pap Phase Variation Model The expression of pap is positively controlled by the local regulators PapI (8 kDa) and PapB (12 kDa) in concert with the A model for Pap phase variation is shown in Fig. 3. Specific global regulators leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) details and supporting data for the model are discussed below. and catabolite gene activator protein (CAP). DNA adenine methylase (Dam) is also required for pap transcription (Table 1). The Self-Perpetuating Phase OFF State. Only the distal GATC site Knockout mutations in each of the genes encoding these regu- of the pap regulatory region is methylated in phase OFF cells latory proteins inhibit the pap phase OFF to phase ON switch (Table 1). In addition, histone-like nucleoid structuring protein This paper results from the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of (H-NS) modulates pap phase switching because hns mutants Sciences, ‘‘Self-Perpetuating Structural States in Biology, Disease, and Genetics,’’ held show a decreased OFF to ON switch rate (6, 7). March 22–24, 2002, at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, DC. The pap regulatory region encompasses the divergently tran- Abbreviations: Lrp, leucine-responsive regulatory protein; Pap, pyelonephritis-associated scribed papI and papB genes together with the 416-bp intergenic pili; Dam, DNA adenine methylase; CAP, catabolite gene activator protein; H-NS, histone- region (Fig. 1). There are six pap DNA Lrp binding sites, like nucleoid structuring protein. designated sites 1–6, within the pap regulatory region spaced ‡To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. 16470–16476 ͉ PNAS ͉ December 10, 2002 ͉ vol. 99 ͉ suppl. 4 www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.182427199 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Table 1. Trans-acting factors that regulate Pap phase variation Genotype Description Switch rates (OFF to ON)* Wild type 7 ϫ 10Ϫ4 per cell per generation lrpϪ Leucine-responsive regulatory protein Locked OFF crpϪ Catabolite gene activator protein Locked OFF damϪ DNA adenine methylase Locked OFF papIϪ Local regulatory protein Locked OFF papBϪ Local regulatory protein Locked OFF hnsϪ Histone-like nucleoid structuring protein 2 ϫ 10Ϫ4 per cell per generation *Switch rates measured in M9 glycerol minimal medium. Data are from refs. 6, 7, 9–11, 13, and 22. (GATCdist methylated, GATCprox nonmethylated). Initial anal- mutual binding exclusion effect is reduced from 10-fold to only ysis indicated that methylation of GATCdist was required for about 2-fold when unsupercoiled DNAs are used (unpublished maintenance of the OFF transcription state because introduc- data), showing a strong dependence on DNA topology. Because tion of an A to C transversion within GATC results in a Lrp is known to form higher oligomers under certain conditions phase-locked ON phenotype (Fig. 1) (10). Although the aden- (19, 20) and bend DNA (21), one possible mechanism is that the osine within GATC is obviously required for methylation of this conformation of pap sites 4–6 might be altered as a result of a site by Dam, the affinities of Lrp for wild-type pap DNA and binding of Lrp at sites 1–3 located 102 bp away (measured from DNA containing the GCTCdist mutation appear similar (10), and site 2 to site 5) (Fig. 1). Because the binding of Lrp to pap DNA dimethyl sulfate footprint analyses indicate that Lrp does not is highly cooperative (8), this could serve as a signal amplifica- closely contact the adenosine of GATC (8). Further studies (10) tion mechanism. As discussed below, when the affinity of Lrp for showed that overproduction of Dam prevented the phase OFF sites 1–3 is reduced by mutation of Lrp binding site 3, mutual to ON transition in cells containing a wild-type pap sequence but exclusion works in reverse, lowering the affinity of Lrp at sites not in cells containing the GCTCdist mutation (Fig. 4). Thus, 1–3 as a result of binding of Lrp at sites 4–6 (Fig. 5B). overmethylation of GATCdist prevents the phase OFF to ON Activation of papBA transcription requires binding of Lrp at transition, consistent with the hypothesis that methylation of this sites 4–6 (8), and thus, binding of Lrp at sites 1–3 indirectly distal GATC site helps maintain cells in the OFF state. inhibits transcription because of mutual exclusion of Lrp binding Another factor that may contribute to maintenance of the at sites 4–6. In addition, Lrp binding at sites 1–3 appears to phase OFF state is a mutual binding exclusion phenomenon.
Recommended publications
  • Dna Methylation Post Transcriptional Modification
    Dna Methylation Post Transcriptional Modification Blistery Benny backbiting her tug-of-war so protectively that Scot barrel very weekends. Solanaceous and unpossessing Eric pubes her creatorships abrogating while Raymundo bereave some limitations demonstrably. Clair compresses his catchings getter epexegetically or epidemically after Bernie vitriols and piffling unchangeably, hypognathous and nourishing. To explore quantitative and dynamic properties of transcriptional regulation by. MeSH Cochrane Library. In revere last check of man series but left house with various gene expression profile of the effect of. Moreover interpretation of transcriptional changes during COVID-19 has been. In transcriptional modification by post transcriptional repression and posted by selective breeding industry: patterns of dna methylation during gc cells and the study of dna. DNA methylation regulates transcriptional homeostasis of. Be local in two ways Post Translational Modifications of amino acid residues of histone. International journal of cyclic gmp in a chromatin dynamics: unexpected results in alternative splicing of reusing and diagnosis of dmrs has been identified using whole process. Dam in dna methylation to violent outbursts that have originated anywhere in england and post transcriptional gene is regulated at the content in dna methylation post transcriptional modification of. A seven sample which customers post being the dtc company for analysis. Fei zhao y, methylation dynamics and modifications on lysine is an essential that. Tag-based our Generation Sequencing. DNA methylation and histone modifications as epigenetic. Thc content of. Lysine methylation has been involved in both transcriptional activation H3K4. For instance aberrance of DNA methylation andor demethylation has been. Chromosome conformation capture from 3C to 5C and will ChIP-based modification.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B
    Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B. M ü ller, G ü nter P. Wagner, and Werner Callebaut, editors The Evolution of Cognition , edited by Cecilia Heyes and Ludwig Huber, 2000 Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Development and Evolutionary Biology , edited by Gerd B. M ü ller and Stuart A. Newman, 2003 Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis , edited by Brian K. Hall, Roy D. Pearson, and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2004 Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach , edited by D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2004 Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems , edited by Werner Callebaut and Diego Rasskin-Gutman, 2005 Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution , by Richard A. Watson, 2006 Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment , by Robert G. B. Reid, 2007 Modeling Biology: Structure, Behaviors, Evolution , edited by Manfred D. Laubichler and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2007 Evolution of Communicative Flexibility: Complexity, Creativity, and Adaptability in Human and Animal Communication , edited by Kimbrough D. Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2008 Functions in Biological and Artifi cial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives , edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes, 2009 Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior , edited by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel, 2009 Innovation in Cultural Systems: Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology , edited by Michael J. O ’ Brien and Stephen J. Shennan, 2010 The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited , edited by Brett Calcott and Kim Sterelny, 2011 Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology , edited by Snait B.
    [Show full text]
  • Restriction Endonucleases
    Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S. Gerstein Copyright © 2001 by Wiley-Liss, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-37972-7 (Paper); 0-471-22390-5 (Electronic) 9 Restriction Endonucleases Derek Robinson, Paul R. Walsh, and Joseph A. Bonventre Background Information . 226 Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Available? . 226 Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? . 227 What Can You Do to Reduce the Cost of Working with Restriction Enzymes? . 228 If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application, What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? . 229 What Are the General Properties of Restriction Endonucleases? . 232 What Insight Is Provided by a Restriction Enzyme’s Quality Control Data? . 233 How Stable Are Restriction Enzymes? . 236 How Stable Are Diluted Restriction Enzymes? . 236 Simple Digests . 236 How Should You Set up a Simple Restriction Digest? . 236 Is It Wise to Modify the Suggested Reaction Conditions? . 237 Complex Restriction Digestions . 239 How Can a Substrate Affect the Restriction Digest? . 239 Should You Alter the Reaction Volume and DNA Concentration? . 241 Double Digests: Simultaneous or Sequential? . 242 225 Genomic Digests . 244 When Preparing Genomic DNA for Southern Blotting, How Can You Determine If Complete Digestion Has Been Obtained? . 244 What Are Your Options If You Must Create Additional Rare or Unique Restriction Sites? . 247 Troubleshooting . 255 What Can Cause a Simple Restriction Digest to Fail? . 255 The Volume of Enzyme in the Vial Appears Very Low. Did Leakage Occur during Shipment? . 259 The Enzyme Shipment Sat on the Shipping Dock for Two Days.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation, Imprinting and Cancer
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2002) 10, 6±16 ã 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/ejhg REVIEW DNA methylation, imprinting and cancer Christoph Plass*,1 and Paul D Soloway*,2 1Division of Human Cancer Genetics and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, OH 43210, USA; 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, NY 14263, USA It is well known that a variety of genetic changes influence the development and progression of cancer. These changes may result from inherited or spontaneous mutations that are not corrected by repair mechanisms prior to DNA replication. It is increasingly clear that so called epigenetic effects that do not affect the primary sequence of the genome also play an important role in tumorigenesis. This was supported initially by observations that cancer genomes undergo changes in their methylation state and that control of parental allele-specific methylation and expression of imprinted loci is lost in several cancers. Many loci acquiring aberrant methylation in cancers have since been identified and shown to be silenced by DNA methylation. In many cases, this mechanism of silencing inactivates tumour suppressors as effectively as frank mutation and is one of the cancer-predisposing hits described in Knudson's two hit hypothesis. In contrast to mutations which are essentially irreversible, methylation changes are reversible, raising the possibility of developing therapeutics based on restoring the normal methylation state to cancer-associated genes. Development of such therapeutics will require identifying loci undergoing methylation changes in cancer, understanding how their methylation influences tumorigenesis and identifying the mechanisms regulating the methylation state of the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life-Cycle of Operons
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Title The Life-cycle of Operons Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0sx114h9 Authors Price, Morgan N. Arkin, Adam P. Alm, Eric J. Publication Date 2005-11-18 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Title: The Life-cycle of Operons Authors: Morgan N. Price, Adam P. Arkin, and Eric J. Alm Author a±liation: Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley CA, USA and the Virtual Institute for Microbial Stress and Survival. A.P.A. is also a±liated with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the UC Berkeley Dept. of Bioengineering. Corresponding author: Eric Alm, [email protected], phone 510-486-6899, fax 510-486-6219, address Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, 1 Cyclotron Road, Mailstop 977-152, Berkeley, CA 94720 Abstract: Operons are a major feature of all prokaryotic genomes, but how and why operon structures vary is not well understood. To elucidate the life-cycle of operons, we compared gene order between Escherichia coli K12 and its relatives and identi¯ed the recently formed and destroyed operons in E. coli. This allowed us to determine how operons form, how they become closely spaced, and how they die. Our ¯ndings suggest that operon evolution is driven by selection on gene expression patterns. First, both operon creation and operon destruction lead to large changes in gene expression patterns. For example, the removal of lysA and ruvA from ancestral operons that contained essential genes allowed their expression to respond to lysine levels and DNA damage, respectively. Second, some operons have undergone accelerated evolution, with multiple new genes being added during a brief period.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION in Silico Signature Prediction
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION In Silico Signature Prediction Modeling in Cytolethal Distending Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Maryam Javadi, Mana Oloomi*, Saeid Bouzari Department of Molecular Biology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran 13164, Iran http://www.genominfo.org/src/sm/gni-15-69-s001.pdf Supplementary Table 6. Aalphabetic abbreviation and description of putative conserved domains Alphabetic Abbreviation Description 17 Large terminase protein 2_A_01_02 Multidrug resistance protein 2A0115 Benzoate transport; [Transport and binding proteins, Carbohydrates, organic alcohols] 52 DNA topisomerase II medium subunit; Provisional AAA_13 AAA domain; This family of domains contain a P-loop motif AAA_15 AAA ATPase domain; This family of domains contain a P-loop motif AAA_21 AAA domain AAA_23 AAA domain ABC_RecF ATP-binding cassette domain of RecF; RecF is a recombinational DNA repair ATPase ABC_SMC_barmotin ATP-binding cassette domain of barmotin, a member of the SMC protein family AcCoA-C-Actrans Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferases AHBA_syn 3-Amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid synthase family (AHBA_syn) AidA Type V secretory pathway, adhesin AidA [Cell envelope biogenesis] Ail_Lom Enterobacterial Ail/Lom protein; This family consists of several bacterial and phage Ail_Lom proteins AIP3 Actin interacting protein 3; Aip3p/Bud6p is a regulator of cell and cytoskeletal polarity Aldose_epim_Ec_YphB Aldose 1-epimerase, similar to Escherichia coli YphB AlpA Predicted transcriptional regulator [Transcription] AntA AntA/AntB antirepressor AraC AraC-type
    [Show full text]
  • Open Matthew R Moreau Ph.D. Dissertation Finalfinal.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Pathobiology Program PATHOGENOMICS AND SOURCE DYNAMICS OF SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR ENTERITIDIS A Dissertation in Pathobiology by Matthew Raymond Moreau 2015 Matthew R. Moreau Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 The Dissertation of Matthew R. Moreau was reviewed and approved* by the following: Subhashinie Kariyawasam Associate Professor, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Dissertation Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Bhushan M. Jayarao Professor, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Dissertation Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Mary J. Kennett Professor, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Vijay Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Nutritional Sciences Anthony Schmitt Associate Professor, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Head of the Pathobiology Graduate Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) is one of the most frequent common causes of morbidity and mortality in humans due to consumption of contaminated eggs and egg products. The association between egg contamination and foodborne outbreaks of SE suggests egg derived SE might be more adept to cause human illness than SE from other sources. Therefore, there is a need to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the ability of egg- derived SE to colonize the chicken intestinal and reproductive tracts and cause disease in the human host. To this end, the present study was carried out in three objectives. The first objective was to sequence two egg-derived SE isolates belonging to the PFGE type JEGX01.0004 to identify the genes that might be involved in SE colonization and/or pathogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of Methylation and Sequestration in the Mechanisms of DNA Replication in Some Members of the Enterobacteriaceae Family
    Chapter 12 Roles of Methylation and Sequestration in the Mechanisms of DNA Replication in some Members of the Enterobacteriaceae Family Amine Aloui, Alya El May, Saloua Kouass Sahbani and Ahmed Landoulsi Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51724 1. Introduction When growing cells divide, they need to copy their genetic material and distribute it to en‐ sure that each daughter cell receives one copy. This is a challenging task especially when the enormous length of the DNA compared to the cell size is considered. During DNA replica‐ tion, organization of the chromosomes is even more demanding, since replication forks con‐ tinuously produce new DNA. This DNA contains all the information required to build the cells and tissues of a prokaryotic or an eukaryotic organism. The exact replication of this in‐ formation in any species assures its genetic continuity from generation to generation and is critical to the normal development of an individual. The information stored in DNA is ar‐ ranged in hereditary units known as genes that control the identifiable traits of an organism. Discovery of the structure of DNA and subsequent elucidation of how DNA directs synthe‐ sis of RNA, which then directs assembly of proteins -the so-called central dogma - were monumental achievements that marked the early days of molecular biology. However, the simplified representation of the central dogma as DNA → RNA → protein does not reflect the role of proteins in the synthesis of nucleic acids. Moreover, proteins are largely responsi‐ ble for regulating DNA replication and gene expression, the entire process whereby the in‐ formation encoded in DNA is decoded into the proteins that characterize various cell types.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Implications of DNA Methylation in Adipose Biology
    Diabetes Volume 68, May 2019 871 Functional Implications of DNA Methylation in Adipose Biology Xiang Ma and Sona Kang Diabetes 2019;68:871–878 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi18-0057 The twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) variants have not been tested for causality, and even if are a serious health, social, and economic issue. The proven causal, they cannot fully explain many clinical dysregulation of adipose tissue biology is central to the features such as high heritability, high discordance in adult development of these two metabolic disorders, as adi- monozygotic twins, and the close relationship with envi- pose tissue plays a pivotal role in regulating whole-body ronmental factors (2–5). Therefore, it has long been metabolism and energy homeostasis (1). Accumulating speculated that nongenetic variation, such as epigenetic evidence indicates that multiple aspects of adipose bi- alterations, plays a role in pathogenesis. This notion has PERSPECTIVES IN DIABETES ology are regulated, in part, by epigenetic mechanisms. been borne out by a recent epigenome-wide association The precise and comprehensive understanding of the study that linked alterations in DNA methylation to whole- epigenetic control of adipose tissue biology is crucial to body insulin sensitivity (6). identifying novel therapeutic interventions that target DNA methylation is a reversible epigenetic mark in- epigenetic issues. Here, we review the recent findings volving the covalent transfer of a methyl group to the C-5 on DNA methylation events and machinery in regulating the developmental processes and metabolic function of position of a cytosine residue by DNA methyltransferases adipocytes. We highlight the following points: 1) DNA (DNMTs), usually in the context of a cytosine-guanine methylation is a key epigenetic regulator of adipose dinucleotide (CpG) doublet.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering Bacterial Epigenomes Using Modern Sequencing Technologies
    REVIEWS Deciphering bacterial epigenomes using modern sequencing technologies John Beaulaurier, Eric E. Schadt and Gang Fang * Abstract | Prokaryotic DNA contains three types of methylation: N6-methyladenine, N4-methylcytosine and 5-methylcytosine. The lack of tools to analyse the frequency and distribution of methylated residues in bacterial genomes has prevented a full understanding of their functions. Now , advances in DNA sequencing technology , including single- molecule, real- time sequencing and nanopore- based sequencing, have provided new opportunities for systematic detection of all three forms of methylated DNA at a genome- wide scale and offer unprecedented opportunities for achieving a more complete understanding of bacterial epigenomes. Indeed, as the number of mapped bacterial methylomes approaches 2,000, increasing evidence supports roles for methylation in regulation of gene expression, virulence and pathogen–host interactions. Phase variation DNA methylation was discovered in bacteria more than MTases has been found to play important regulatory 1 2–12 A means by which reversible a half century ago . It is now known that modification roles in bacteria . RM systems protect cells from variation of protein expression of the four canonical DNA bases by methylation can act invading DNA by methylating endogenous DNA and is achieved in bacteria, often in as an epigenetic regulator — that is, it can impart dis- cleaving non- methylated foreign DNA2,4. RM sys- an ON/OFF manner. The process creates phenotypic tinct and reversible regulatory states to identical genetic tems are divided into three main categories based diversity in a clonally expanded sequences. In eukaryotes, epigenetic regulation can on the subunits involved and the precise site of DNA population and allows the occur at multiple levels: DNA methylation, nucleosome restriction13–16 (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbiota-Produced N-Formyl Peptide Fmlf Promotes Obesity-Induced Glucose
    Page 1 of 230 Diabetes Title: The microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide fMLF promotes obesity-induced glucose intolerance Joshua Wollam1, Matthew Riopel1, Yong-Jiang Xu1,2, Andrew M. F. Johnson1, Jachelle M. Ofrecio1, Wei Ying1, Dalila El Ouarrat1, Luisa S. Chan3, Andrew W. Han3, Nadir A. Mahmood3, Caitlin N. Ryan3, Yun Sok Lee1, Jeramie D. Watrous1,2, Mahendra D. Chordia4, Dongfeng Pan4, Mohit Jain1,2, Jerrold M. Olefsky1 * Affiliations: 1 Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 3 Second Genome, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA. 4 Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. * Correspondence to: 858-534-2230, [email protected] Word Count: 4749 Figures: 6 Supplemental Figures: 11 Supplemental Tables: 5 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online April 22, 2019 Diabetes Page 2 of 230 ABSTRACT The composition of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and associated metabolites changes dramatically with diet and the development of obesity. Although many correlations have been described, specific mechanistic links between these changes and glucose homeostasis remain to be defined. Here we show that blood and intestinal levels of the microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF), are elevated in high fat diet (HFD)- induced obese mice. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of the N-formyl peptide receptor Fpr1 leads to increased insulin levels and improved glucose tolerance, dependent upon glucagon- like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Obese Fpr1-knockout (Fpr1-KO) mice also display an altered microbiome, exemplifying the dynamic relationship between host metabolism and microbiota.
    [Show full text]
  • GENE REGULATION Differences Between Prokaryotes & Eukaryotes
    GENE REGULATION Differences between prokaryotes & eukaryotes Gene function Description of Prokaryotic Chromosome and E.coli Review Differences between Prokaryotic & Eukaryotic Chromosomes Four differences Eukaryotic Chromosomes Form Length in single human chromosome Length in single diploid cell Proteins beside histones Proportion of DNA that codes for protein in prokaryotes eukaryotes humans Regulation of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes Terms promoter structural gene operator operon regulator repressor corepressor inducer The lac operon - Background E.coli behavior presence of lactose and absence of lactose behavior of mutants outcome of mutants The Lac operon Regulates production of b-galactosidase http://www.sumanasinc.com/webcontent/animations/content/lacoperon.html The trp operon Regulates the production of the enzyme for tryptophan synthesis http://bcs.whfreeman.com/thelifewire/content/chp13/1302002.html General Summary During transcription, RNA remains briefly bound to the DNA template Structural genes coding for polypeptides with related functions often occur in sequence Two kinds of regulatory control positive & negative General Summary Regulatory efficiency is increased because mRNA is translated into protein immediately and broken down rapidly. 75 different operons comprising 260 structural genes in E.coli Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes some regulation occurs because as little as one % of DNA is expressed Gene Expression and Differentiation Characteristic proteins are produced at different stages of differentiation producing cells with their own characteristic structure and function. Therefore not all genes are expressed at the same time As differentiation proceeds, some genes are permanently “turned” off. Example - different types of hemoglobin are produced during development and in adults. DNA is expressed at a precise time and sequence in time.
    [Show full text]