DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Oklahoma Graduate College Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Oklahoma Graduate College Fish View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SHAREOK repository UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FISH FACTS: DISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENT OF ICHTHYOLOGY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE By Carolyn Scearce Norman, Oklahoma 2019 FISH FACTS: DISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENT OF ICHTHYOLOGY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE BY THE COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF Dr. Katherine Pandora, Chair Dr. Piers Hale Dr. Kerry Magruder Dr. Stephen Weldon Dr. Bruce Hoagland © Copyright by CAROLYN SCEARCE 2019 All rights Reserved. Table of Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Nature’s Historian 17 Chapter 2 Comparative Anatomy and the Quest for Nature’s Order 66 Chapter 3 Zoological Catalogs at the British Museum 105 Chapter 4 The “First” Ichthyology Textbook 150 Chapter 5 Louis Agassiz and Fish Paleontology 201 Conclusion 266 Bibliography 278 iv Abstract This dissertation chronicles the disciplinary development of ichthyology through the work of three prominent nineteenth-century naturalists: Georges Cuvier (1769-1832), Louis Agassiz (1807-1873), and Albert Günther (1830-1914). Cuvier argued that historical knowledge was necessary in order to understand the development of the natural sciences, and he devoted a significant portion of his career writing and lecturing on the development of these sciences. Cuvier’s zoological studies focused on vertebrates, and he wrote foundational works in comparative anatomy and paleontology. He applied techniques from comparative anatomy and paleontology to the study of fish. Toward the end of his career Cuvier began working on a catalog of fish with the assistance of Achille Valenciennes (1794-1865). Cuvier died before this work was finished and Valenciennes continued the 22-volume series. Günther’s work followed the methodologies promoted by Cuvier. Over the course of his career he produced a catalog of fish that described over 8000 species of fish. He also wrote the first English language textbook on ichthyology. Agassiz studied under Cuvier during the final six months of Cuvier’s life. Between the early-1830s and mid-1840s Agassiz studied fish fossils in the museums of Europe, describing over 1600 species of extinct fish. Agassiz’s study of fish paleontology influenced his interpretation of the fossil record and reinforced his belief that the geological evidence did not support evolutionary theory. v Acknowledgements Over the course of my academic training I have had the good fortune to have been mentored by many exceptional teachers, but two people stand out as pivotal in shaping the path of my intellectual formation. While a graduate student at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Paul Dayton helped to foster my love of natural history. Here at the University of Oklahoma my committee chair, Katherine Pandora, helped me craft that interest into a means of shaping analytical and historical ideas into a narrative describing the way people learned about the natural world. I have reason to be grateful to so many of the faculty, staff and students within the department of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine at OU for providing the supportive environment I needed to finish a dissertation even while suffering from significant health issues. Two fellow graduate students, Margaret Gaida and Emily Margolis, have offered friendship and encouragement throughout my graduate studies at OU. I would like to extend special thanks to the members of my dissertation committee: Piers Hale, Kerry Magruder, Stephen Weldon and Bruce Hoagland. Each of the members of my committee provided thoughtful feedback at some point in the process of composing my dissertation. When it seemed like my dissertation might falter, Kerry Magruder and the staff at the Special Collections have provided me the haven I needed to finish my dissertation. I am grateful to my parents, who helped support me when I had to take time off work to finish my dissertation. And finally, I would like to thank my partner Robert and my friends Barbara and George who provided moral support when I needed it the most. vi INTRODUCTION Ichthyology: Organizing a Zoological Discipline For many years before I became a graduate student in the history of science, I had been contemplating the question of information overload. How do people transform a large, disorderly assortment of information into a coherent narrative? It has always been a serious question for me, since I suffer from learning disabilities that seriously impair my language processing speed and that lead me to be easily overwhelmed in physical locations that are either noisy, crowded, bright, or hyperkinetic. Once I started my studies in the history of science, I quickly discovered that the problem of information overload was not new to either our own time or our culture. I was impressed by Ann Blair's book Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age, which explored how scholars during the early modern period coped with the rapid expansion of knowledge after the invention of the printing press.1 Armed with this insight, I realized that considering how people attempted to solve this issue in the past might make it easier to understand how people might continue to address these issues in the future. As a former biology major, and as someone who had also worked for five years editing a scholarly database for the aquatic sciences, I wanted to address my research to an issue relevant to my previous studies. Furthermore, as a master’s degree student in Oceanography, I had developed an interest in marine conservation. I knew that in marine habitats the pressures of overfishing resulted in the decline of many species of fish, and that some were currently 1 Ann Blair, Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010). 1 being threatened with extinction. Freshwater fish also face serious threats, although these are more frequently due to problems of pollution or habitat degradation. Conservation is a subject with historical ramifications, both in terms of the construction of knowledge, and in tracking populations of organisms over time. I decided that there might be practical benefits to understanding the development of knowledge about fish, in order to aid conservationists interested in using historical records to understand more about what fish populations may have looked like in the past.2 These are the chief reasons I chose to write a history of the disciplinary development of ichthyology as my dissertation topic. A limited amount of material relating to the history of ichthyology does appear within the literature for the history of science, but very little of this material is specifically related to the development of ichthyology as a discipline. As a result, it is easier to find the relevant material for developing an initial narrative of ichthyology among the work of past and now living ichthyologists. For anyone wishing to cultivate an understanding of the history of ichthyology, the best place to begin is a history of ichthyology written by the early nineteenth century naturalist, Georges Cuvier. Although Cuvier originally wrote in French, his ichthyology history is available in English translation, thanks to the scholarly efforts of ichthyologist Theodore Pietsch.3 Cuvier’s own career, including his ichthyology history, serves as a useful foundation on which to build the story of the disciplinary development of ichthyology. When I started working on my dissertation in 2013, besides myself and Pietsch, few people were 2 When I was attending Scripps Institution of Oceanography and working on my master’s degree in Oceanography, there were two other graduate students at Scripps working on projects that involved examining historical records in order to gain a better understanding of changes in fish populations over the past couple of centuries. 3 Georges Cuvier, Historical Portrait of the Progress of Ichthyology form Its Origins to Our Own Time, Edited by Theodore W. Pietisch and translated by Abby J. Simpson (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.) 2 currently working on extended projects in the history of ichthyology.4 In 2015, Paul Smith, a professor of French Literature at the University of Leiden initiated a research project focused on ichthyological literature, although his primary research interests are largely confined to early modern texts.5 Additionally, two Ph.D. students have been working under the auspices of Smith’s project. Sophia Hendrikx’s6 work focuses on the sixteenth century naturalist Conrad Gesner. Didi van Trijp’s7 dissertation is focused on the work of four prominent ichthyologists who wrote foundational texts over the course of the century and a half leading up to where my dissertation begins. With the exception of the subjects of ornithology and entomology, historians of science have paid little attention to the development of the zoological disciplines. Zoological histories require specialized knowledge and a tolerance of a literature focused on the monotonous accumulation of detailed information. Since so few histories such as these have been written, it is unclear that they will yield a significant intellectual payout. There is still some uncertainty regarding what constitutes a disciplinary history. The literature on disciplinary histories within the sciences is still quite modest, even though two 4 There is a very useful book that came out in 2012 after I entered the History of Science Program at OU and was still working on my master’s thesis. This book gave an account of the development of ichthyology in Australia and spans the nineteenth and early twentieth century. While this book is relevant to the development of ichthyology as a discipline, it is a work focused on colonial efforts. During the nineteenth century, European ichthyologists were still at the forefront of the disciplinary development of ichthyology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philip Skippon's Description of Florence (1664)
    PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) in: PHILIP SKIPPON: An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low-Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English (...), second edition, volume VI (London 1746) edited with an Introduction by MARGARET DALY DAVIS FONTES 51 [12 July 2009] Zitierfähige URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/volltexte/2010/1216/ urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-artdok-12163 1 Philip Skippon, An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English in six volumes with a general preface giving an account of the progress of navigation from its beginning, London: Printed by assignment from Messrs. Churchill for Henry Lintot; and John Osborn, at the Golden-Bell in Pater-noster Row, Vol. VI, 1746, pp. 375-749. 2 CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION: PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) 24 THE FULL TEXT OF PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 48 PHILIP SKIPPON, JOHN RAY, FRANCIS WILLUGHBY, NATHANIEL BACON 50 PAGE FACSIMILES 3 INTRODUCTION: PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) by Margaret Daly Davis Philip Skippon, An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low-Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English (...), [London: Printed by assignment from Messrs. Churchill], 2nd ed., vol.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Goblinlike, Fantastic: Little People and Deep Time at the Fin De Siècle
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output ’Goblinlike, fantastic: little people and deep time at the fin de siècle https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40443/ Version: Full Version Citation: Fergus, Emily (2019) ’Goblinlike, fantastic: little people and deep time at the fin de siècle. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email ‘Goblinlike, Fantastic’: Little People and Deep Time at the Fin De Siècle Emily Fergus Submitted for MPhil Degree 2019 Birkbeck, University of London 2 I, Emily Fergus, confirm that all the work contained within this thesis is entirely my own. ___________________________________________________ 3 Abstract This thesis offers a new reading of how little people were presented in both fiction and non-fiction in the latter half of the nineteenth century. After the ‘discovery’ of African pygmies in the 1860s, little people became a powerful way of imaginatively connecting to an inconceivably distant past, and the place of humans within it. Little people in fin de siècle narratives have been commonly interpreted as atavistic, stunted warnings of biological reversion. I suggest that there are other readings available: by deploying two nineteenth-century anthropological theories – E. B. Tylor’s doctrine of ‘survivals’, and euhemerism, a model proposing that the mythology surrounding fairies was based on the existence of real ‘little people’ – they can also be read as positive symbols of the tenacity of the human spirit, and as offering access to a sacred, spiritual, or magic, world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Claims of the Negro, Ethnologically Considered
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection THE CLAIMS OF THE NEGBO, ETHNOLOGICALLY CONSIDERED, AN ADDRESS, dan t\t Jitorg WESTERN RESERVE COLLEGE, At Commencement, July 12, 1854. BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS. ROCHESTER: PRINTED BY LEE, MASS & CO., DAILY AMERICAN OF1ICE. 1851 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection THE CLAIMS OF THE NEGRO, ETKNOLOGICAILY CONSIDERED. AN ADDRESS, thxt \\t Jitorg WESTERN RESERVE COLLEGE, At Commencement, July 12, 1854. BY FREDERICK ^OUGLASS. ROCHESTER: POINTED BT LEE, MANN & CO., DAILY AMERICAN OFFICE, RCCHESTEB. 1854. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection D AN ADDRESS. Gentlemen of the Philozetian Society : h- I propose to submit to you a few thoughts on the j subject of the Claims of the Negro, suggested by \ ethnological science, or the natural history of man. ^J But before entering upon that subject, I trust you \ will allow me to make a remark or two, somewhat ^personal to myself. The relation between me and this occasion may justify what, in others, might seem an offence against good taste. This occasion is to me one of no ordinary interest, for many reasons; and the honor you have done me, in selecting me as your speaker, is as grateful to my heart, as it is novel in the history of American Col- legiate or Literary Institutions. Surprised as I am, the public are no less surprised, at the spirit of inde" pendence, and the moral courage displayed by the gentlemen at whose call I am here. There is felt to be a principle in the matter, placing it far above egotism or personal vanity ; a principle which gives to this occasion a general, and I had almost said, an univer sal interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Josiah Clark Nott
    DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Dr. Josiah Clark Nott HDT WHAT? INDEX DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT 1804 March 31, Saturday: Josiah Clark Nott was born in Columbia, South Carolina, a son of Federalist congressman and attorney Abraham Nott (February 5, 1768-June 19, 1830). Ludwig van Beethoven published something that virtually amounted to a retraction in the Wiener Zeitung, acknowledging that Artaria and Co. had not been involved in any way with the publication of his quintet. In Newport, Rhode Island, Friend Stephen Wanton Gould wrote in his journal: Seventh day afternoon 31 3rd M 1804 No life. the day spent as usual in my occupation ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT Dr. Josiah Clark Nott “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT 1824 Josiah Clark Nott graduated at South Carolina College. LIFE IS LIVED FORWARD BUT UNDERSTOOD BACKWARD? — NO, THAT’S GIVING TOO MUCH TO THE HISTORIAN’S STORIES. LIFE ISN’T TO BE UNDERSTOOD EITHER FORWARD OR BACKWARD. “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Dr. Josiah Clark Nott HDT WHAT? INDEX DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT DR. JOSIAH CLARK NOTT 1826 Josiah Clark Nott received the diploma of a medical doctor at the University of Pennsylvania. He would serve for a year as an attending physician at the Philadelphia Almshouse. THE FUTURE IS MOST READILY PREDICTED IN RETROSPECT “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdobserver17.4 Page183-188 an Honor Without Profit Richard K
    AN HONOR WITHOUT PROFIT by Richard K. Walton eponymy n The derivation of a name of a city, country, era, institution, or other place or thing from the name of a person. Gruson in his Words for Birds gives seven categories for the origins of common bird names: appearance (Black-capped Chickadee), eponymy (Henslow’s Sparrow), echoics (Whooping Crane), habitat (Marsh Wren), behavior (woodpecker), food (oystercatcher), and region (California Condor). The second category comprises people and places memorialized in bird names. Many of our most famous ornithologists as well as a fair number of obscure friends and relations have been so honored. A majority of these names were given during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the pioneering era of North American ornithology. While some of these tributes are kept alive in our everyday birding language, others have slipped into oblivion. Recognition or obscurity may ultimately hinge on the names we use for birds. There is no more famous name in the birding culture than that of John James Audubon. His epic The Birds of America was responsible for putting American science, art, and even literature on the international map. This work was created, produced, promoted, and sold largely by Audubon himself. In the years since his death in 1851, the Audubon legend has been the inspiration for a multitude of ornithological pursuits and causes, both professional and amateur. Audubon painted some five hundred birds in Birds of America and described these in his five-volume Ornithological Biographies. Many of the names given by Audubon honored men and women of his era.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Zoology
    Tc XsTTn IV. Modem Age. Upper Tertiary For/Titition III. Tertiary Age. Lower Tertiary Cretaceous Oolitic II. Secondary Age. Trias Carboniferous Devonian 1 Palseozoic Age. Upper Silurian Lower Siluri»w Metamorphic Rocks. CRUST QF THE R^ETH A.S EtRLA^TEB TQ ZQQLO&Y. w*!K:.ir.%. ■ i J-» ■-■ r' ^ ■ / Principles j^e ZooLocYr^l , 4 ■■ -v-: /i f< • tm svmcTi^ Hm -m ■.'' ,-■■. JS^aSSAL ■ MSAS iUO}:/' ' - ■ •V/iiA 'S' jt; ( > C-^ ' ^ '■: ' ■'L-s , •- -■ -' ->*y^'*- . /. •'!^v ,W . • ‘^1 i 4 T V •^i-' ; '!■ .•"-ss -■< •■ ■ ' ■ •*<—-. ^ ■ '. .,‘ • rt ,.^'%^«Mj>Aa-ATr'rs . - ' J T H c ks ^ Of s c H iir O t $ #. «l 3 t o €1 E a C \V >,• -.r •'i'O •.-, - ' 'V' '.■ .'“r - ’■' -S ^ .7. '. ,;r . •■ Itv'^'- , • 1/^ ■ ‘r > 7 - *T AvJ'Vi** ■ ' -A ■ ">.K S;|4 j S SES:' v^jp . ■- ./ VV»vv'i-;-'- r'^yj ;• ^. x-.rv: ■'4&s£^r' idHmiu :s .. C.:-' .<vr :'; ■•■ iC*-‘- ■ ‘ ■'^■'■■■- - . (< , . .■• yvwj'<1— »• • -t *■* . , • V i^ ' 8^2*T, J. » -C^nig^ ;'y'? '•‘j wi;ir VORK; siiJH.ooTf ano co>TpA*y. "Lt -- i*' •■■ i/irA_:.;i.5 iA YjfjgA-} %.o T't . , aT- ■ \ S ^-'i -:- : ; '-r- . >s*-« ■- i^Vr '. "• '■. ■.; '^^ ,v ,* ^ ^Lri. ■ ^ . - P' ^ . j j -n - 'v .'-^ ic^: i’*^— r r-!: '>/ A i \ '. ^/< ’ • ?* * ** “ ‘^K Ht^-.'i- 'S '.' •'■■%. ^'4 ••f. - I. V, ^:/:'..;'.i, J • ;s'/^ \* ••■ ?T-’^'.’ -♦■ ■’* * ■ 'at;w^T or tftR EA-aw a.§ rku. zookoc-r. ■ A, ■*. :j'^ •‘tv;!;,, ■ ^ I—'* r Principles TOUCHING THE STRECTUEE, DEVELOPMENT, DISTPJBUTION, AND NATURAL ARRANGEMENT or THE llACES OF ANUIALS, LIVING AND EXTINCT. WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS. PART I. COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY. FOR THE USE OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES.
    [Show full text]
  • (Evolution) Prior to Darwin's Origin of Species
    Theories of Species Change (Evolution) Prior to Darwin’s Origin of Species Theories of Species Change Prior to Darwin Entangled with: 1. Theories of geological change. 2. Theories of heredity. 3. And theories of ontogenesis, that is, of individual development– embryology. Notions of Species in the Classical Period of Greece Plato: the essence or form of an organism is eternal and unchanging; embodiment only the appearance of that form. Aristotle: the essence or form of an organism is incorporated in the physical body; the only kind of eternity enjoyed is through continued reproduction. Theories of Species Change in the Early Modern Period Descartes: gradual evolution of physical system according to fix laws (Discourse on Method, 1628). Buffon (1707-88) and Linnaeus (1707-78): God created a limited number of species, but through hybridization and impact of environment, new species appear. Kant: evolutionary development from earth possible only if earth already construed as purposive; species change possible but no evidence (Critique of Judgment, 1790). Transformation of one species into another through change of scaling, from D’Arcy Thompson, On Growth and Form (1942). Carus’s illustration of the Richard Owen’s illustration of the archetype archetype, from his On the Nature of Limbs (1849) Georges Cuvier (1769-1832). Portrait by François-André Vincent Adam’s Mammoth, found in Siberia in 18th century; St. Petersburg Natural History Museum Cuvier’s illustration of the Siberian mammoth; he identified it as an extinct species of elephant (1796). Cuvier’s illustration of the “Ohio Animal,” which he named “mastodon.” Megatherium (i.e., “large animal”), discovered in South America, described by Cuvier as an extinct creature similar to the modern sloth.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Steps in Ichthyology and New Challenges*
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., UDC: 597(091) AADRAY 49(3): 201 - 232, 2008 Evolutionary steps in ichthyology and new challenges* Walter NELLEN 1* and Jakov DULČIĆ 2 1 Institut for Hydrobiology and Fisheries, University of Hamburg, Olbersweg 24, 22767 Hamburg, Germany 2 Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, P.O. Box 500, 21 000 Split, Croatia * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] One may postulate that man’s interest in fish emerged as soon as he was able to express his thoughts and notions as fish, among other animals, were subject of early communications. These were transmitted first by drawings, later by inscriptions and in writings. It was but much later that fishes began to occupy man’s interest as objects of science. Aristotle’s treatises on “History of Ani- mals” is the first known document dealing with fish as a zoological object. No earlier than in the 16th century fish regained the interest of learned men, among these Olaus Magnus (1490 –1557), Gregor Mangolt (1498–1576), Guillaume Rondelet (1507–1557), Pierre Belon (1512–1564), Hip- polyto (Ippolito) Salviani (1513–1572) and, above all, Conrad Gesner (1516–1565). The 17th and more so the 18th century is known as the period of Enlightenment. Respect must be paid to three pioneers in this field, i.e. Francis Willughby (1635–1672), Peter Artedi (1705–1735), and Marc Elieser Bloch (1723–1799) who became clearly aware that the class of fish consists of species which may be classified and typically described as such. After the species concept had been embodied in the scientific way of thinking by Linné, a tremendous expansion of activities emerged in the field of ichthyology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 from Ray to Leeuwenhoek
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87589-9 - Remarkable Biologists Ioan James Excerpt More information 1 From Ray to Leeuwenhoek john ray (1627–1705) I begin in seventeenth-century England with a naturalist whose writings earned him the titles of ‘the father of natural history’ and ‘the Aristotle of England and Linnaeus of the time’. Cuvier said that his works were the basis of all modern geology, von Haller that he was the greatest botanist in the memory of man. John Ray, the third child of Roger Ray, the village blacksmith, and his wife Elizabeth was born in the hamlet of Black Notley in rural Essex on November 29, 1627. Elizabeth Ray ‘was of great use in her neighbourhood,’ we are told, ‘particularly to her neighbours that were lame or sick, among whom she did a great deal of good, especially in chirur- gical matters’. Her son John was educated at Braintree School, where his ability was recognised, and at the age of sixteen went to Cambridge, sup- ported by a bursary from a local squire. After two years at the Catharine Hall he migrated to Trinity College, where there was less scholasticism. The brilliant Isaac Barrow was a fellow-pupil; their tutor described them as more able than Isaac Newton was as an undergraduate. After graduation Ray was elected to a minor fellowship and began the study of botany. In the following decade he held a series of college offices. Ray was a prolific writer all his life; his first book, published in 1660, was a flora of the neighbour- hood of Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology in Post-Truth Society
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2017) 71:76 DOI 10.1007/s00265-017-2303-7 EDITORIAL Behavioral ecology and sociobiology in post-truth society James F. A. Traniello1 & Theo C. M. Bakker2 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 William Whewell (1833)coinedthetermscientist to describe the falsehoods and hoaxes that have virtually become every- experts in the study of natural phenomena. BNature,^ he day occurrences. Although the study of climate change has wrote, Bis a collection of facts governed by laws….To ascer- been the target of most high-profile assaults, skepticism is not tain such laws of nature is the peculiar business of science.^ restricted to atmospheric science or limited to specific research Today, scientists practice in a post-truth society in which trou- agendas. Online journalists attempt to throw truth and reality bling, and often disturbing, attitudes toward science have be- into question and undermine all science by challenging the come commonplace. Science is being marginalized and sup- peer review process. This attack on how ideas are critically pressed (Vernon 2017). Concerns are raised about risks of evaluated, how data are validated, and the nature of proof is human endangerment resulting from the disregard of science insidious. (Gross 2017). Parallels are drawn between the dissemination What should behavioral ecologists do in the present social andgrowthofBfake news^ and the spread of disease environment of denialism? How should we respond to science (Kucharski 2016). Higgins (2016) sounds the alarm: Blosing its relevance as a source of truth^ (Makri 2017)? The BScientists … should be shocked by the idea of post-truth, answer is that we should preach what we practice in a unified … speak up when scientific findings are ignored,… keep voice that is loud and clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific BIOGRAPHY and the CASE of GEORGES CUVIER
    Hist. Sci.) xiv (1976), 101-137 1976HisSc..14..101O SCIENTIFic BIOGRAPHY AND THE CASE OF GEORGES CUVIER: WITH A CRITICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Dorinda OutralU University of Reading The purpose of this introduction is to provide some interpretative tools for the reader of the body of secondary literature on Georges Cuvier which is examined in the attached critical bibliography. Criticism and analysis of existing work is therefore emphasized, and the problems in­ volved in constructing a positive biography of Cuvier are only briefly examined. Not only strictly biographical studies, but also work on all aspects of Cuvier's achievement, have been so strongly informed by pre­ suppositions about his character, that a knowledge of this bias and its characteristic expressions is nece.<;sary before previous work on Cuvier can be properly interp'reted. This bibliography is thus also intended as a necessary clearing of the ground before further study of Cuvier's career can be undertaken. This is true not only because it is necessary to discover the precise extent of factual inadequacy in our knowledge of Cuvier's life and achievement, but also because we need to increase our awareness of the role which biographical inquiry has played in the history of science, for without this awareness, the full implications of the adoption of the form cannot be assessed. Interest in Georges Cuvier has increased considerably during the last decade, but so far almost no account has been taken of the extraordinary biographical tradition through which we view him. Almost every presen­ tation of Cuvier since his death in 1832 has been dominated by emphases which were established very soon afterwards, and which have continued to monopolize the attention of historians of the life-sciences until very recently.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Advancement of Science: James Mckeen Cattell and the Networks Of
    1 The Advancement of Science: James McKeen Cattell and the Networks of Prestige and Authority, 1894-1915 ROBIN VANDOME The need for an authoritative and widely-accessible American scientific periodical was keenly felt by 1880, when the weekly Science was established in New York by the journalist John Michels, with the financial backing of scientific entrepreneur Thomas Edison. As the astronomer and mathematician Simon Newcomb had observed with regret in 1874, “The difficulty is not that our scientific men are indifferent to knowledge, but that they do not go through the laborious and thankless process of digesting and elaborating their knowledge and publishing it to the world.”1 Some promising scientific publications had, in fact, emerged, ranging from the commercial Scientific American (established in 1846) and the specialist American Naturalist (established in 1867 and limited, as Newcomb noted, “entirely to biology”), to the more philosophically-inclined magazine aimed at a broadly-educated audience, Popular Science Monthly (established in 1872).2 But the only periodical that met Newcomb’s high standards for the publication of new research was the venerable American Journal of Science and Arts (established in 1818), and even that title was restricted largely to the earth sciences at the expense of many new disciplines.3 Multiple efforts to cater to general scientific interests in a single periodical were made in the 1870s and 1880s, only for most to flounder after a few months or years, in line with the typical pattern for new magazines in this period.4 The shorter-lived contemporaries of Science included the Science Record (1872-77), Scientific Monthly (1875-76), Scientific Observer (1877-87), Science News (1878-79), Illustrated Scientific News (1878-81), Scientific Man (1878-82), a second Science Record (1884-85), Science Review (1885-86), and Science and Education (1886-87), among still others.5 By 1900, however, Science clearly 2 filled the gap felt by the likes of Newcomb.
    [Show full text]