Sky Survey a Progress Report Tim Pearson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sky Survey a Progress Report Tim Pearson The C-Band All-Sky Survey A Progress Report Tim Pearson 2011 May 26 C-BASS • A full-sky 5 GHz survey – single dish, with matched antennas in north and south – Northern Survey from OVRO 6.1 m dish (California) – Southern Survey from 7.6 m Telkom dish Karoo (SA MeerKAT/SKA site) • Total intensity and linear polarization (I, Q, U) • Resolution comparable to Planck 30 GHz and Haslam 408 MHz • Minimal corruption by Faraday rotation and depolarization • Primary goal: improved understanding of synchrotron foreground for CMB experiments (e.g., “WMAP haze”) • Improve accuracy of foreground subtraction in polarization • Contribute to studies of Galactic ISM and magnetic field • Motivation: see talks by Jo Dunkley and Clive Dickinson. Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 2 C-BASS Collaboration • Caltech/JPL – Tim Pearson, Stephen Muchovej, Oliver King, Matthew Stevenson, Tony Readhead, Russ Keeney, Dayton Jones • Oxford – Mike Jones, Angela Taylor, Charles Copley, Jamie Leech, Matthew Brock, Christian Holler [Esslingen], Jaya John John, Joe Zuntz • Manchester – Clive Dickinson, J Patrick Leahy, Rod Davies, Richard Davis, Melis Irfan • South Africa (HartRAO, Rhodes) – Justin Jonas, Roy Booth • Saudi Arabia (KACST) – Yaser Hafez Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 3 Why 5 GHz? WMAP 23 GHz polarized intensity DRAO/Villa Elisa 1.4 GHz Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 4 Sun et al. A&A 477, 573–592 (2008) Why 5 GHz? • Halfway (in log ν) between surveys at 1.4 GHz (Stockert, Reich & Reich) and 23 GHz (WMAP). • Expected high-latitude Faraday rotation a few degrees, c.f. ~30° at 2.3 GHz. – residual correction at high latitude via 1.4 GHz polarization survey from Penticton (Wolleben) / Villa Elisa (Testori, Reich & Reich) • Below main emission from anomalous dust, so predominantly synchrotron. – helps to constrain AME models • Signal still strong enough (few mK) to measure in a reasonable time (< 1 year) with a single receiver. Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 5 Survey Parameters • FWHM resolution 48 arcmin – Same as Haslam et al. 408 MHz survey • Accurate to lowest multipoles – At scan speed 4 deg/s needs fknee < 10 mHz (plus destriping) • Frequency 4.5 – 5.5 GHz • Target sensitivity: 0.1 mK / beam rms, i.e., will detect polarized brightness of 0.5 mK – Corresponds to ~1 μK at 23 GHz (β = 3) – 99% of pixels in WMAP 23 GHz pol intensity are detected at this level • Tsys ~ 20 K – gives NET ~ 0.45 mK s1/2 – 20s/beam → 14 days to survey a hemisphere (night-time only) • 6 months to give complete night-time coverage – factor of 12 in hand for overheads Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 6 Impact on Planck results • Typical high latitude 1 deg pixel Planck Planck+CBASS • Mean synch amplitude 80 µK@ 23 GHz Stokes I • MCMC reconstruction CMB mean error (µK) 5.4 4.0 Synch amp error (µK) 1.4 0.44 • 25% improvement Synch index error 0.29 0.03 • × 3 improvement Dust amp error (µK) 3.4 2.8 • × 10 improvement Dust index error 0.29 0.29 Stokes Q,U • 25% improvement CMB mean error (µK) 3.6 2.7 • × 4 improvement Synch amp error (µK) 0.67 0.17 • × 10 improvement Synch index error 0.29 0.03 Dust amp error (µK) 0.29 0.97 Dust index error 0.29 0.29 Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 7 Constraining synchrotron spectral index Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 8 Receiver Architecture: 1 Internal cold load reference for I Analog correlation polarimeter LCP/RCP for Q,U Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 9 Receiver Architecture: 2 • Digital correlation polarimeter – two downconverted channels of 500 MHz sampled in 1st and 2nd Nyquist zones • 2 x ROACH FPGA board each with 4 x 1 GS/s ADC inputs • 64-channel spectrometer Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 10 Challenges • Stray radiation – novel optics design • Stability – temperature control, component selection, power supplies, etc. – use of digital techniques • Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) – choose a radio-quiet location – careful shielding – notch filters • 1/f noise (map stripes) – rapid scanning to modulate sky signal – map-making algorithms • Calibration Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 11 Telescope Optics California South Africa Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 12 Telescope Optics Simulation Measurement Bare optics Secondary baffle Primary baffle Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 13 Receiver noise power spectra • E-Merlin C-band LNAs – intrinsic fknee ~1 Hz: • Intensity channel, balanced – fknee ~ 30 mHz • Polarization – fknee ~ 10 mHz • Should be minimal polarization 1/f receiver noise at fscan = 11 mHz • Scan in az at constant el at ~ 4°/s Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 14 Descart Destriping Map Maker • Model timestream as sum of: – Signal projected by pointing P – 1/f noise modeled by baseline offsets a – purely white noise w • Solve for a with conjugate gradient and subtract to make problem purely white noise Sutton et al 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1387 Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 15 Preliminary Results Moon I Geo satellites Galaxy Fixed RFI source Ground (mountaIn) P Transient RFI Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 16 Preliminary Results C-BASS 5 GHz A few weeks’ data… no RFI removal, opacity correction, calibration… Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 17 Preliminary Results Reich & Reich 1.4 GHz Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 18 Preliminary Results Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 19 Preliminary Results Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 20 Preliminary Results Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 21 Status • Northern Survey – Upgrade in progress at OVRO • Improved stability • Better RFI rejection – Survey complete in late 2011/early 2012 • Southern Survey – Antenna ready at Klerefontein – Receiver under construction in Oxford and Manchester – Survey complete in 2012 • Full data release in 2013 - for Planck public release Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 22 OMT and feedhorn Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 23 RFI Pearson FGC2011 Zadar, May 26, 2011 24.
Recommended publications
  • George Harrison
    COPYRIGHT 4th Estate An imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers 1 London Bridge Street London SE1 9GF www.4thEstate.co.uk This eBook first published in Great Britain by 4th Estate in 2020 Copyright © Craig Brown 2020 Cover design by Jack Smyth Cover image © Michael Ochs Archives/Handout/Getty Images Craig Brown asserts the moral right to be identified as the author of this work A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, down-loaded, decompiled, reverse engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins. Source ISBN: 9780008340001 Ebook Edition © April 2020 ISBN: 9780008340025 Version: 2020-03-11 DEDICATION For Frances, Silas, Tallulah and Tom EPIGRAPHS In five-score summers! All new eyes, New minds, new modes, new fools, new wise; New woes to weep, new joys to prize; With nothing left of me and you In that live century’s vivid view Beyond a pinch of dust or two; A century which, if not sublime, Will show, I doubt not, at its prime, A scope above this blinkered time. From ‘1967’, by Thomas Hardy (written in 1867) ‘What a remarkable fifty years they
    [Show full text]
  • The Iau Historic Radio Astronomy Working Group
    THE IAU HISTORIC RADIO ASTRONOMY WORKING GROUP. 2: PROGRESS REPORT This Progress Report follows the inaugural report of the Working Group (WG), which appeared in the April 2004 ICHA Newsletter and was published in the June 2004 issue of the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (see Orchiston et al., 2004, below). Role of the WG This WG was formed at the 2003 General Assembly of the IAU as a joint initiative of Commissions 40 (Radio Astronomy) and 41 (History of Astronomy), in order to: • assemble a master list of surviving historically-significant radio telescopes and associated instrumentation found worldwide; • document the technical specifications and scientific achievements of these instruments; • maintain an on-going bibliography of publications on the history of radio astronomy; and • monitor other developments relating to the history of radio astronomy (including the deaths of pioneering radio astronomers). New Committee Members Since the last report was prepared we have added two further members to the Committee of the WG. As Chair of the WG, I am delighted to offer a warm welcome to Richard Wielebinski from the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy, representing Germany, and Jasper Wall (University of British Columbia), who represents Canada. Further Publications on the History of Radio Astronomy Balick, B., 2005. The discovery of Sagittarius A*. In Orchiston, 2005b, 183-190. Beekman, G., 1999. Een verjaardag zonder jarige. Zenit, 26(4), 154-157. Cohen, M., 2005. Dark matter and the Owens Valley Radio Observatory. In Orchiston, 2005b, 169-182. Davies, R.D., 2003. Fred Hoyle and Manchester. Astrophysics and Space Science, 285, 309- 319.
    [Show full text]
  • August to December 2011 ALTERNATIVE COSMOLOGY GROUP
    1 ALTERNATIVE COSMOLOGY GROUP www.cosmology.info Monthly Notes of the Alternative Cosmology Group – 2011 Part Two: August to December 2011 The ACG Webmaster who distributes this newsletter to subscribers would prefer not to receive related correspondence. Please address all correspondence to MNACG Editor, Hilton Ratcliffe: [email protected]. The ACG newsletter is distributed gratis to subscribers. Get onto our mailing list without obligation at www.cosmology.info/newsletter. The current newsletter is a review of more than 12,000 papers published on arXiv under astro-ph, together with 6500 under gen-phys, for the months of April to December, 2011. We now include papers archived elsewhere, provided access is full and open. The Alternative Cosmology Group draws its mandate from the open letter published in New Scientist, 2004 (www.cosmologystatement.org), and these monthly notes seek to publicise recently published empirical results that are aligned with that ethos. In other words, what observations seem anomalous in terms of the Standard Model of Cosmology? We prefer observational results and tend to avoid complete cosmologies and purely theoretical work. Discussion of method is welcome. If you would like to suggest recently published or archived papers for inclusion, please send the arXiv, viXra or other direct reference and a brief exposition to Hilton Ratcliffe ([email protected]). Note that our spam filter rejects slash and colon in the text, so please write web addresses commencing “www”. I. Editorial comment I apologise most profusely again for the delay in getting the MNACG out to you. This newsletter and one that preceded it cover several months each, so please pardon their lengthiness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Small Array: Latest Results and Future Plans
    The Very Small Array: latest results and future plans Keith Grainge Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge Rencontres de Moriond, 31 March 2004 OVERVIEW The Very Small Array (VSA) • Current primordial observations • The S-Z effect • Planned upgrades to the instrument • Future science at high ` • Summary • 1 THE VSA CONSORTIUM Cavendish Astrophysics Group Roger Boysen Tony Brown Chris Clementson Mike Crofts Jerry Czeres Roger Dace Keith Grainge (PM) Mike Hobson (PI) Mike Jones Rüdiger Kneissl Katy Lancaster Anthony Lasenby Klaus Maisinger Ian Northrop Guy Pooley Vic Quy Nutan Rajguru Ben Rusholme Richard Saunders Richard Savage Anna Scaife Jack Schofield Paul Scott (Former PI) Clive Shaw Anze Slosar Angela Taylor David Titterington Elizabeth Waldram Brian Wood Jodrell Bank Observatory Colin Baines Richard Battye Eddie Blackhurst Pedro Carreira Kieran Cleary Rod Davies Richard Davis Clive Dickinson Yaser Hafez Mark Polkey Bob Watson Althea Wilkinson Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Jose Alberto Rubiño-Martin Carlos Guiterez Rafa Rebolo Lopez Pedro Sosa-Molina Ricardo Genova-Santos 2 THE VERY SMALL ARRAY (VSA) Sited on Observatorio del Teide, Tenerife • 14 antennas 91 baselines • ) Observing frequency ν = 26 36 GHz; bandwidth ∆ν = 1:5 GHz • − Compact configuration: 143 mm horns; ` = 150 800; ∆` 90 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2000 – Sept 2001 Extended configuration: 322 mm horns; ` = 300 1800; ∆` 200 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2001 – present 3 COMPARISON WITH OTHER CMB EXPERIMENTS Different systematics from “single-dish” experiments: • – negligible pointing error – negligible beam uncertainty Different from other CMB interferometers (DASI, CBI): • – RT survey and dedicated source subtraction 2-element interferometer remove effect of extragalactic point sources ) – tracking elements rather than comounted can apply fringe rate filter to remove unwanted signals.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Band All Sky Survey (C-BASS)
    C-Band All Sky Survey (C-BASS) J. P. Leahy (PI, Manchester), M. E. Jones (PI, Oxford) Clive Dickinson (JPL) AIMS: • Definitive survey of Galactic synchrotron radiation and its polarization • Anchor for synchrotron emission in future CMB polarimetry experiments up to CMBPOL. • Prototype for possible ground-based surveys at frequencies up to CMB band: 10, 15, 30… GHz • New window on Galactic magnetic field and cosmic rays BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 Galactic foregrounds WMAP polarized brightness: 23 GHz, 4° beam • Sky is full of polarized interstellar synchrotron emission – 91% of pixels detected at this resolution • All components have significant spectral variations We must have more measurements than parameters! BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 Foreground brightness • Smoothing removes emission that fluctuates on scales smaller than the beam – E.g. CMB ‘E-modes’ • Similar amplitudes at 2° and 4°: – Looking at signal, not noise! – Polarization has little small- scale structure. • (Foreground, high latitude) • At 4° resolution, polarization clearly detected in 91% of pixels • Median: 15 µK @ 22.5 GHz • Histogram of polarization values at 22.5 GHz, 4° beam, with various masks BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 4° Pol. Maps in other bands 33 GHz 41 GHz 61 GHz 94 GHz BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 C-BASS motivation • CMB polarization splits T into orthogonal modes: • E-modes fix optical depth to re-ionization – dramatic reduction in parameter degeneracy • B-modes define energy E scale of inflation • Obscured by Galactic B foreground emission – minimum at ~60 GHz – synchrotron below – dust above. BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 C-BASS motivation: 60 GHz • E-modes fix optical depth to re-ionization C-BASS – dramatic reduction in E parameter degeneracy 60 GHz • B-modes define energy scale of B inflation • Obscured by Galactic r = 0.1 foreground emission – minimum at ~60 GHz g in – synchrotron below s n e – dust above.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Radar Astrophysics and Space Science Library
    Under the Radar Astrophysics and Space Science Library EDITORIAL BOARD Chairman W. B. BURTON, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A. ([email protected]); University of Leiden, The Netherlands ([email protected]) F. BERTOLA, University of Padua, Italy J. P. CASSINELLI, University of Wisconsin, Madison, U.S.A. C. J. CESARSKY, European Southern Observatory, Garching bei Mu¨nchen, Germany P. EHRENFREUND, Leiden University, The Netherlands O. ENGVOLD, University of Oslo, Norway A. HECK, Strasbourg Astronomical Observatory, France E. P. J. VAN DEN HEUVEL, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands V. M. KASPI, McGill University, Montreal, Canada J. M. E. KUIJPERS, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands H. VAN DER LAAN, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands P. G. MURDIN, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK F. PACINI, Istituto Astronomia Arcetri, Firenze, Italy V. RADHAKRISHNAN, Raman Research Institute, Bangalore, India B. V. SOMOV, Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, Russia R. A. SUNYAEV, Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia W.M. Goss l Richard X. McGee Under the Radar The First Woman in Radio Astronomy: Ruby Payne-Scott Prof. W. M. Goss Dr. Richard X. McGee National Radio Astronomy Commonwealth Scientific& Observatory Industrial 1003 Lopezville Road P.O.Box O Research Organisation Socorro NM 87801 (CSIRO) USA Radiophysics Laboratory [email protected] Epping NSW 1710 Australia ISSN 0067-0057 ISBN 978-3-642-03140-3 e-ISBN 978-3-642-03141-0 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03141-0 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009931715 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010, 2nd corrected printing This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iau Historic Radio Astronomy Working Group
    Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 12(3), 249-253 (2009). THE IAU HISTORIC RADIO ASTRONOMY WORKING GROUP. 3: PROGRESS REPORT (2006-2009) This Progress Report follows the publication of two et al., 2009—see details, the listing in Section 6, earlier Progress Reports (Orchiston, et al., 2004; 2005) below). Two further papers, completing this series, and a Triennial Report of the Working Group for will be published in March 2010. 2003-2006 (Orchiston, et al., 2006), all of which appeared in the Journal of Astronomical History and 5 Research on the History of Radio Astronomy Heritage. Colleagues who actively researched aspects of radio astronomical history during 2005-2009 included: the 1 Role of the Working Group late Émile-Jacques Blum (France), André Boischot This WG was formed at the 2003 General Assembly of (France), the late Ron Bracewell (USA), Wim Brouw the IAU as a joint initiative of Commissions 40 (Radio (The Netherlands), Geoffrey Burbidge (USA), Bernard Astronomy) and 41 (History of Astronomy), in order Burke (USA), Ron Burman (Australia), Jessica Chap- to: man (Australia), Marshall Cohen (USA), Nan Dieter • assemble a master list of surviving historically- Conklin (USA), R.D. Dagkesamanskii (Russia), Rod significant radio telescopes and associated instru- Davies (United Kingdom), Suzanne Débarbat mentation found worldwide; (France), Jean Delannoy (France), John Dickel (USA), • document the technical specifications and scien- Martin George (Australia), Miller Goss (USA), Dave tific achievements of these instruments; Green (United Kingdom), Alastair Gunn (United • maintain an on-going bibliography of public- Kingdom), Dave Jauncey (Australia), Ken Kellermann cations on the history of radio astronomy; and (USA), A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Novel Analysis Techniques to Cosmic Microwave
    Application of novel analysis techniques to Cosmic Microwave Background astronomy Aled Wynne Jones Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory and King’s College, Cambridge. A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Cambridge. arXiv:astro-ph/9903173v1 11 Mar 1999 i Preface This dissertation is the result of work undertaken at the Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cambridge between October 1994 and September 1997. The work described here is my own, unless specifically stated otherwise. To the best of my knowledge it has not, nor has any similar dissertation, been submitted for a degree, diploma or other qualification at this, or any other university. This dissertation does not exceed 60 000 words in length. Aled Wynne Jones To Isabel and Ffion ii I am not sure how the universe was formed. But it knew how to do it, and that is the important thing. Anon. (child) It is enough just to hold a stone in your hand. The universe would have been equally incomprehensible if it had only consisted of that one stone the size of an orange. The question would be just as impenetrable: where did this stone come from? Jostein Gaarder (in ‘Sophie’s World’) Acknowledgements Firstly I would like to thank the two people who have introduced me to the immense field of microwave background anisotropies, Anthony Lasenby and Stephen Hancock. Without them I would not have begun to uncover the beauty at the beginning of time. I would also like to thank Joss Bland-Hawthorn whose supervision and enthusiasm during my time in Australia has made me more inquisitive in my field.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimating Astronomy
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2004 Legitimating Astronomy Graham Howard University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Howard, Graham, Legitimating Astronomy , PhD thesis, School of Social Science, Media and Communication, University of Wollongong, 2004. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/333 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Browne Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, the University of Manchester
    Battye, Browne, Dickinson, Heron, Maffei, Pourtsidou 2013 MNRAS, 434, 1239 [arXiv:1209.0343] BINGO: A novel experiment for HI intensity mapping at z=0.1-0.5 Ian Browne Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, The University of Manchester BINGO : BINGO Players BAOs from JBCA, Manchester Brazil Richard Battye Filipe Abdalla (UCL) Integrated Marie-Anne Bigot-Sazy Elcio Abdalla (Sao Paolo) Michael Brown Raul Abramo (Sao Paolo) Ian Browne Alex Wueunsche (INPE) Neutral Michael D’Cruze Thryso Villela (INPE) Peter Dewdney (SKA PO) +engineers (INPE) Richard Davis Gas Clive Dickinson Uruguay Keith Grainge Gonzalo Tancredi Bruno Maffei Manuel Caldas Alkistis Portsidou (->Portsmouth) Emilio Falco Observations Peter Wilkinson Ana Mosquera KACST, Saudi Arabia Zurich (ETH) Yaser Hafez Alex Refregier Adam Amara Christian Monstein Outline • Very brief background • BINGO approach • Current design • Expected performance • Where we are now • L-BASS as a test platform (Battye, Weller & Davies, 2004; Peterson 2006) Consider cell at z=0.5 (30 arcmin)2 Equivalent to (8h-1Mpc)3 s 8 ~ 1 Dfobs = 1MHz 10 Average HI mass in side the cell = 1.2 x 10 Msun Brightness Temp = approx 100 mK with fluctuations = O(1) Typical Noise Level on 1MHz is 50mKs1/2 -> around 3days to detect 100 mK BINGO approach • Let’s try and make life as easy as possible – Build on CMB experience – No moving parts – Room temperature amplifiers – Sidelobes as low as possible – Low cross polarization – observe in circular • Build quickly! Tenerife Experiment (circa 1990-6) JBO/Cambridge/IAC CMB expt
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 7: 53-56 (2004) The IAU Historic Radio Astronomy Working Group. 1: Progress Report Wayne Orchiston Anglo-Australian Observatory, and Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Rod Davies Jodrell Bank, University of Manchester, Macclesfield, SK11 9DL, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Jean-Francois Denisse 48 rue Mr Le Prince, 75006 Paris, France E-mail messages to: [email protected] Ken Kellermann National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd., Charlotteville, VA 22903-2475, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Masaki Morimoto Nishi Harima Astronomical Observatory, 407 2 Nishi Kawachi, Sayoh Cho, Hyohgo 679 5313, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Slava Slysh Astronomy Space Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, PrBoxsojuznaya Ul 84/32, 117810 Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Govind Swarup NCRA TIFR, Pune University Campus Pb3, Ganeshkind, Pune 411 007, India E-mail: [email protected] Hugo van Woerden Kapteyn Sterrekundig Instituut, University of Groningen, Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] This new Working Group was established at the Australia’s pioneering efforts in international radio July 2003 IAU General Assembly in Sydney, with a astronomy, it was only natural that such sessions view to: should form part of the program at the Sydney GA, (1) assembling a master list of surviving and it was pleasing to see that they drew capacity historically-significant radio telescopes and audiences. Science Meeting 2, on “The Early associated instrumentation found world- Development of Australian Radio Astronomy”, ran wide; all day on July 21, and attracted the following oral (2) documenting the technical specifications and and poster papers: scientific achievements of such instruments; (3) maintaining an on-going bibliography of Sullivan, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Observational and Theoretical Advances in Cosmological Foreground Emission
    Observational and Theoretical Advances in Cosmological Foreground Emission Thesis by Matthew A. Stevenson In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2014 (Defended July 12, 2013) ii © 2014 Matthew A. Stevenson All Rights Reserved iii Dedicated to Jennifer, Bronson, and Edmund. iv Acknowledgments I carry a debt of gratitude to many people. First I must thank my supervisor Tony Readhead for his support of this work and his patience for the variety of crazy ideas I came up with (and sometimes discarded) along the way. I must also thank Tim Pearson, who acted as my mentor in the day-to-day grind of actually getting this work done. His patience was inexhaustible, despite my many false starts and dead ends. Being a part of C-BASS has afforded me the pleasure of working with many smart people. Fore- most is Oliver King, my analog counterpart, with whom I have enjoyed many frantic troubleshooting sessions. Jaya John John set me on the path of FPGA programming, which has been great fun. Clive Dickinson's insights and support of my efforts have been a huge inspiration. Stephen Mu- chovej's tireless work on the telescope, control system, and pipeline were indispensable. This project has also given me the privilege of working with Rachana Bhatawdekar, Roy Booth, Charles Copley, Rod Davies, Richard Davis, Paul Grimes, Yaser Hafez, Christian Holler, Melis Irfan, Justin Jonas, Dayton Jones, Mike Jones, Paddy Leahy, Jamie Leech, Erik Leitch, Angela Taylor, and Joe Zuntz. Outside of the C-BASS collaboration, I have had the opportunity to work with many other fine people.
    [Show full text]