The Very Small Array: Latest Results and Future Plans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Very Small Array: Latest Results and Future Plans The Very Small Array: latest results and future plans Keith Grainge Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge Rencontres de Moriond, 31 March 2004 OVERVIEW The Very Small Array (VSA) • Current primordial observations • The S-Z effect • Planned upgrades to the instrument • Future science at high ` • Summary • 1 THE VSA CONSORTIUM Cavendish Astrophysics Group Roger Boysen Tony Brown Chris Clementson Mike Crofts Jerry Czeres Roger Dace Keith Grainge (PM) Mike Hobson (PI) Mike Jones Rüdiger Kneissl Katy Lancaster Anthony Lasenby Klaus Maisinger Ian Northrop Guy Pooley Vic Quy Nutan Rajguru Ben Rusholme Richard Saunders Richard Savage Anna Scaife Jack Schofield Paul Scott (Former PI) Clive Shaw Anze Slosar Angela Taylor David Titterington Elizabeth Waldram Brian Wood Jodrell Bank Observatory Colin Baines Richard Battye Eddie Blackhurst Pedro Carreira Kieran Cleary Rod Davies Richard Davis Clive Dickinson Yaser Hafez Mark Polkey Bob Watson Althea Wilkinson Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Jose Alberto Rubiño-Martin Carlos Guiterez Rafa Rebolo Lopez Pedro Sosa-Molina Ricardo Genova-Santos 2 THE VERY SMALL ARRAY (VSA) Sited on Observatorio del Teide, Tenerife • 14 antennas 91 baselines • ) Observing frequency ν = 26 36 GHz; bandwidth ∆ν = 1:5 GHz • − Compact configuration: 143 mm horns; ` = 150 800; ∆` 90 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2000 – Sept 2001 Extended configuration: 322 mm horns; ` = 300 1800; ∆` 200 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2001 – present 3 COMPARISON WITH OTHER CMB EXPERIMENTS Different systematics from “single-dish” experiments: • – negligible pointing error – negligible beam uncertainty Different from other CMB interferometers (DASI, CBI): • – RT survey and dedicated source subtraction 2-element interferometer remove effect of extragalactic point sources ) – tracking elements rather than comounted can apply fringe rate filter to remove unwanted signals. ) 4 MEM VSA MAPS OF CMB ANISOTROPIES Colour scale runs from 200 200 µK; typical thermal noise level 25 µK. • − − − Consistent with Gaussian random field (Savage et al.;Smith et al.) • 5 VSA POWER SPECTRUM OF CMB ANISOTOPIES Combined power spectrum from: • – Two 3-field and one 2-field compact array mosaics (total sky area = 101 sq deg). – Three 7-field and four 3-field extended array mosaics (total sky area = 81 sq deg). – Dickinson et al. (astro-ph0402498) 6 COMPARISON OF VSA AND WMAP VSA 33-field mosaic power spectrum with source residual correction 8000 6000 ) 2 K µ ( π /2 l 4000 +1) C l ( l 2000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Multipole, l Consistent calibration – measurement of dipole anisotropy transferred to Jupiter. • 7 8 VSA CLUSTER MAPS A1795 Coma A2142 A478 Primordial CMB contaminates SZ observations. • 9 GAS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS Measure Gas Fraction in Clusters measure Baryon Fraction of Universe ) Standard Method SZ Method – X-ray deprojection + constant T – Fit King model to visibilities ρgas(r) ρgas(r) ) ) – Hydrostatic Equilibrium – Hydrostatic Equilibrium fg ) Mr tot(r) – Different systematics ) ; fg – Will highlight clumping of gas ) Better method combines SZ and Lensing – Lensing total mass ! – SZ gas mass independent of its distribution ! Have weak lensing observations of six VSA clusters. Lancaster et al. in prep. 10 THE FUTURE:THE SUPER-EXTENDED VSA 1 m Paraboloid focus Mirror (moulded carbon fibre) Support struts (carbon fibre tube) Want to measure high-` power spectrum with high sensitivity. • Composite mirror with metallised surface supported by extension of existing struts. • Replace front-end amplifiers with new devices: Tsys = 35K 25 K. • ! Fit a clone of the AMI correlator: ∆ν = 1.5GHZ 6GHz. • ! Factor of 10 increase in observing speed • 11 SCIENCE WITH THE ENHANCED VSA 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 Single binned, predicted performance of enhanced VSA (using known observing efficiency).• Opportunity before 2008 for a high-` and small-∆` total-intensity experiment • beyond WMAP resolution, with low systematics and ability to subtract foregrounds Three clear goals: –• determine detailed structure of CMB power spectrum out to ` 2000 – determine overall power level of CMB power spectrum at ` > 2000' – high-resolution, high-sensitivity imaging of CMB anisotropies 12 Detailed structure of power spectrum out to ` 2000: ' Presence of further acoustic oscillations • Form of damping tail physics of recombination, mechanism for fluctuation damping • ) Form of primordial fluctuation index ns(k) inflation dynamics, test scale-invariance • ) Resolve existing parameter degeneracies, e.g. (Ωm; ΩΛ) and (ns; τ) • Set constraints on variable-α theories • 13 Power level at ` > 2000: 3000 2000 1000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Investigate excess power observed by CBI to > 10σ • Determine contribution of integrated SZ effect: • – low frequency (30 GHz) observations – dedicated source subtraction – direct mapping rather than differencing If integrated SZ effect strong 2% constraint on σ8 (currently controversial) • ) ± 14 High-resolution, high-sensitivity imaging of CMB anisotropies: Deep 3-field mosaic (5 deg2) 1.5 µK per 5-arcmin beam (3 Planck sensitivity) • ) × Search for small-scale structures such as topological defects (cosmic strings) • Sensitive tests for statistical non-Gaussianity • Mapping SZ effect in nearly massive clusters • Detect signature of primordial magnetic field • 15 SUMMARY The VSA has measured the CMB power spectrum from ` = 150 1600. • − Post-WMAP, there is still a huge amount to be learnt at high `. • – Measure 4th, 5th.... peaks — break degeneracies (∆` critical). – Investigate primordial fluctuation index (nrun?; reject Harrison-Zel’dovich spectrum?) – Investigate CBI excess at ` > 2000. – High-sensitivity searches for topological defects. The VSA can be enhanced to meet these challenges and has the advantage of • excellent rejection of systematics. 16 FRINGE-RATE FILTERING VSA has tracking rather than co-mounted antennas. • can filter out signals that do not come from the part of the sky being observed ) VSA can observe during the day. • VSA makes direct images rather than difference maps. • 17 SOURCE SUBTRACTION FOR THE VSA The problem At 26 36 GHz expect contamination from (variable) extragalactic radio sources • − The solution Survey VSA fields in advance at 15 GHz with Ryle telescope • Simultaneously monitor these sources at 30 GHz with source subtractor 2-element • interferometer while making CMB observations with the main array No need to project out sources • 18.
Recommended publications
  • Philippa Hartley Title Abstract
    Philippa Hartley Title Cosmic telescopes: witnessing the emission mechanism of radio quiet quasars Abstract The quasar model has reached relative maturity: we know that light is emitted at great power across the electromagnetic spectrum from the active nuclei of distant galaxies, where violent accretion processes release huge amounts of energy from gravitational stores. We observe that, in some quasars, matter falling onto the central black hole is funnneled into dramatic jets, emitting radio light across galactic distances. Over cosmic history the quasar population peaked in unison with star formation activity, leading us to suspect the role of quasars in the quenching of star-formation. Missing from the picture, however, is a full understanding of how such feedback processes manifest in the vast majority of quasars: those objects with very little radio emission. In these 'radio-quiet' quasars, jets appear to be absent, and it is possible that the faint radio signal that we do detect is the result either of smaller-scale AGN activity, of continued star formation, or of both. Only by undestanding the source of this very faint emission can we fully understand the quasar stage of galaxy evolution. This talk presents findings using strong gravitational lenses as 'cosmic telescopes' that magnify distant source structure, allowing us to resolve these intriguing objects to the sub-parsec scale. Philippa Hartley SKA Organisation, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Cheshire, SK11 9FT, UK +44 (0)161 306 9600 · [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS
    [Show full text]
  • George Harrison
    COPYRIGHT 4th Estate An imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers 1 London Bridge Street London SE1 9GF www.4thEstate.co.uk This eBook first published in Great Britain by 4th Estate in 2020 Copyright © Craig Brown 2020 Cover design by Jack Smyth Cover image © Michael Ochs Archives/Handout/Getty Images Craig Brown asserts the moral right to be identified as the author of this work A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, down-loaded, decompiled, reverse engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins. Source ISBN: 9780008340001 Ebook Edition © April 2020 ISBN: 9780008340025 Version: 2020-03-11 DEDICATION For Frances, Silas, Tallulah and Tom EPIGRAPHS In five-score summers! All new eyes, New minds, new modes, new fools, new wise; New woes to weep, new joys to prize; With nothing left of me and you In that live century’s vivid view Beyond a pinch of dust or two; A century which, if not sublime, Will show, I doubt not, at its prime, A scope above this blinkered time. From ‘1967’, by Thomas Hardy (written in 1867) ‘What a remarkable fifty years they
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Radionet3 Networking Activity
    REPORT ON THE RADIONET3 NETWORKING ACTIVITY TITLE: LOFAR SCIENCE WEEK 2014 A JOINT MEETING COMBINING THE “2014 LOFAR COMMUNITY SCIENCE WORKSHOP” AND A SEPARATE, RELATED SYMPOSIUM ON “FIRST SCIENCE WITH LOFAR’S FIRST ALL-SKY SURVEY” DATE: 7 APRIL – 11 APRIL 2014 TIME: ALL DAY LOCATION: AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS MEETING WEBPAGE http://www.astron.nl/lofarscience2014/ HOST INSTITUTE: ASTRON (NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR RADIO ASTRONOMY) PARTICIPANTS NO: 105 (COMMUNITY WORKSHOP) / 62 (SURVEY WORKSHOP) MAIN LEADER: ASTRON Project supported by the European Commission Contract no.: 283393 REPORT: 1. Agenda of the meeting The final programmes for both of the workshops are reproduced in their entirety in Appendix A. The programs and presentations are also available from the conference website. 2. Scientific Summary The LOFAR Science Week for 2014 was held April 7-11, 2014 in Amsterdam, NL and brought together roughly 120 members of the LOFAR science community. The week began on Monday afternoon with a LOFAR Users Meeting, open to the whole LOFAR community, organized by ASTRON and intended to provide a forum for users to both learn about the status of the array as well as provide feedback. Members of ASTRON gave updates on the current operational status, ongoing developments, and plans for the coming year. Representative users from the community were also invited to share their personal experiences from using the system. Robert Pizzo and the Science Support team were on hand to answer questions and gathered a lot of good feedback that they will use to improve the user experience for LOFAR. The User’s Meeting was followed on Tuesday by a two day LOFAR Community Science Workshop where nearly 120 members of the LOFAR collaboration came together to present their latest science results and share ideas and experiences about doing science with LOFAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Planck 2011 Conference the Millimeter And
    PLANCK 2011 CONFERENCE THE MILLIMETER AND SUBMILLIMETER SKY IN THE PLANCK MISSION ERA 10-14 January 2011 Paris, Cité des Sciences Monday, January 10th 2011 13:00 Registration 14:00 Claudie Haigneré (Présidente of Universcience) Welcome Planck mission status, Performances, Cross-calibration Jan Tauber (ESA) - Jean-Loup Puget (IAS Orsay) - Reno Mandolesi (INAF/IASF Bologna) Introduction Session chair: François Pajot 14:20 François Bouchet (Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris) 30+5' HFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 14:55 Marco Bersanelli (University of Milano) 30+5' LFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 15:30 Ranga Chary (IPAC Caltech) 30+5' Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue (invited on Planck early paper) 16:05 Coffee break 16:30 Goran Pilbratt (European Space Agency) 20+5' The Herschel observatory (invited) Radio sources 16:55 Bruce Partridge (Haverford College) 25+5' Overview (invited) 17:25 Luigi Tofolatti (Universidad de Oviedo) 20+5' Planck radio sources statistics (invited on Planck early paper) 17:50 Francisco Argueso (Universidad de Oviedo) 15+5' A Bayesian technique to detect point sources in CMB maps 18:10 Anna Scaife (Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies) 15+5' The 10C survey of Radio Sources - First Results 18:30 End of day 1 19:00 Welcome reception at the Conference Center Tuesday, January 11th 2011 Radio sources (continued) Session chair: Bruce Partridge 9:00 Anne Lahteenmaki (Aalto University Metsahovi Radio Observatory) 20+5' Planck observations of extragalactic radio
    [Show full text]
  • The Iau Historic Radio Astronomy Working Group
    THE IAU HISTORIC RADIO ASTRONOMY WORKING GROUP. 2: PROGRESS REPORT This Progress Report follows the inaugural report of the Working Group (WG), which appeared in the April 2004 ICHA Newsletter and was published in the June 2004 issue of the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (see Orchiston et al., 2004, below). Role of the WG This WG was formed at the 2003 General Assembly of the IAU as a joint initiative of Commissions 40 (Radio Astronomy) and 41 (History of Astronomy), in order to: • assemble a master list of surviving historically-significant radio telescopes and associated instrumentation found worldwide; • document the technical specifications and scientific achievements of these instruments; • maintain an on-going bibliography of publications on the history of radio astronomy; and • monitor other developments relating to the history of radio astronomy (including the deaths of pioneering radio astronomers). New Committee Members Since the last report was prepared we have added two further members to the Committee of the WG. As Chair of the WG, I am delighted to offer a warm welcome to Richard Wielebinski from the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy, representing Germany, and Jasper Wall (University of British Columbia), who represents Canada. Further Publications on the History of Radio Astronomy Balick, B., 2005. The discovery of Sagittarius A*. In Orchiston, 2005b, 183-190. Beekman, G., 1999. Een verjaardag zonder jarige. Zenit, 26(4), 154-157. Cohen, M., 2005. Dark matter and the Owens Valley Radio Observatory. In Orchiston, 2005b, 169-182. Davies, R.D., 2003. Fred Hoyle and Manchester. Astrophysics and Space Science, 285, 309- 319.
    [Show full text]
  • August to December 2011 ALTERNATIVE COSMOLOGY GROUP
    1 ALTERNATIVE COSMOLOGY GROUP www.cosmology.info Monthly Notes of the Alternative Cosmology Group – 2011 Part Two: August to December 2011 The ACG Webmaster who distributes this newsletter to subscribers would prefer not to receive related correspondence. Please address all correspondence to MNACG Editor, Hilton Ratcliffe: [email protected]. The ACG newsletter is distributed gratis to subscribers. Get onto our mailing list without obligation at www.cosmology.info/newsletter. The current newsletter is a review of more than 12,000 papers published on arXiv under astro-ph, together with 6500 under gen-phys, for the months of April to December, 2011. We now include papers archived elsewhere, provided access is full and open. The Alternative Cosmology Group draws its mandate from the open letter published in New Scientist, 2004 (www.cosmologystatement.org), and these monthly notes seek to publicise recently published empirical results that are aligned with that ethos. In other words, what observations seem anomalous in terms of the Standard Model of Cosmology? We prefer observational results and tend to avoid complete cosmologies and purely theoretical work. Discussion of method is welcome. If you would like to suggest recently published or archived papers for inclusion, please send the arXiv, viXra or other direct reference and a brief exposition to Hilton Ratcliffe ([email protected]). Note that our spam filter rejects slash and colon in the text, so please write web addresses commencing “www”. I. Editorial comment I apologise most profusely again for the delay in getting the MNACG out to you. This newsletter and one that preceded it cover several months each, so please pardon their lengthiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing Galaxy Halos Using Background Polarized Radio Sources
    Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Master’s thesis in Physics and Astronomy ANTON NILSSON Department of Earth and Space Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson © Anton Nilsson, 2016. Supervisor: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Examiner: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Telephone +46 31 772 1000 Cover: Polarized emission of the radio source J133920+464115 at Faraday depth +20.75 rad m−2 in grayscale. The contours show the total intensity. Typeset in LATEX Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 iv Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Linearly polarized radio emission from synchrotron sources undergoes Faraday ro- tation when passing through a magneto-ionized medium. This might be used to search for evidence of ionized halos around galaxies, using polarized radio sources as a probe. In this thesis I analyze the polarization properties of background radio sources from the Taylor et al. (2009) catalog based on observations with the Very Large Array, and correlate these to the angular separation between the radio sources and foreground galaxies. I find a decrease in the amount of polarized radio sources near the galaxies, interpreting this as radio sources being depolarized by galaxy halos.
    [Show full text]
  • OTFM for Fast Mapping & Rapid Data Products
    OTFM for fast mapping & rapid data products Steven T. Myers (NRAO) for the VLASS team 1 B&E Caltech July 2016 The VLA Sky Survey (VLASS) On-the-fly Mosaicking (OTFM) for efficient fast mapping of the sky and pipelines for rapid genera=on of Data Products … wherein we elucidate the sundry benefits of using the recently upgraded Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array to survey large areas of the sky to discover new transient phenomena and illuminate heretofore hidden explosions throughout the Universe, and to explore cosmic magnetism h0ps://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass 2 B&E Caltech July 2016 Why a new VLA Sky Survey? A New VLA deserves a New Sky Survey https://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass • Expanded (bandwidth, time resolution) capabilities of Jansky VLA • 20 years since previous pioneering VLA sky surveys – NVSS 45” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 450µJy/bm (2932hrs) 30Kdeg2 2Msrcs – FIRST 5” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 150µJy/bm (3200hrs) 10.6Kdeg2 95Ksrcs • Preparing the way for a new generation of surveys – ASKAP and MeerKAT – SKA phase 1 – new O/IR surveys (i/zPTF, PanSTARRS,DES,LSST), X-ray (eROSITA) • Science Proposal and survey definition by community Survey Science Group (SSG) following AAS 223 workshop in Jan 2014 – community review and approval in March 2015 3 B&E Caltech July 2016 VLASS Survey Science Group A Survey For the Whole Community Proposal Authors: Table 8: VLASS Proposal Contributors, Including VLASS White Paper Authors F. Abdalla, Jose Afonso, A. Amara, David Bacon, Julie Banfield, Tim Bastian, Richard Battye, Stefi A. Baum, Tony Beasley, Rainer Beck, Robert Becker, Michael Bell, Edo Berger, Rob Beswick, Sanjay Bhat- nagar, Mark Birkinshaw, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Weak Lensing Studies with New Radio Telescopes
    PROSPECTS FOR WEAK LENSING STUDIES WITH NEW RADIO TELESCOPES MICHAEL L. BROWN Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL I consider the prospects for performing weak lensing studies with the new generation of radio telescopes that are coming online now and in the future. I include a description of a proposed technique to use polarization observations in radio weak lensing analyses which could prove extremely useful for removing a contaminating signal from intrinsic alignments. Ultimately, the Square Kilometre Array promises to be an exceptional instrument for performing weak lensing studies due to the high resolution, large area surveys which it will perform. In the nearer term, the e-MERLIN instrument in the UK offers the high sensitivity and sub-arcsec resolution required to prove weak lensing techniques in the radio band. I describe the Su- perCLASS survey – a recently accepted e-MERLIN legacy programme which will perform a pioneering radio weak lensing analysis of a supercluster of galaxies. 1 Weak lensing in the radio band Weak gravitational lensing is the coherent distortion in the images of faint background galaxies due to gravitational light deflection caused by intervening (dark) matter distributions. On the very largest scales, the effect traces the large scale structure of the Universe and is known as cosmic shear. The vast majority of weak lensing surveys to date have been conducted in the optical bands since large numbers of background galaxies are required in order to measure the small (∼ a few %) distortions. However, a new generation of powerful radio facilities is now imminent which makes weak lensing in the radio band a viable alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Square Kilometre Array: Processing Voluminous Meerkat Data on IRIS
    SQUARE KILOMETRE ARRAY :PROCESSING VOLUMINOUS MEERKAT DATA ON IRIS Priyaa Thavasimani Anna Scaife Faculty of Science and Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Manchester The University of Manchester Manchester, UK Manchester, UK [email protected] [email protected] June 1, 2021 ABSTRACT Processing astronomical data often comes with huge challenges with regards to data management as well as data processing. MeerKAT telescope is one of the precursor telescopes of the World’s largest observatory Square Kilometre Array. So far, MeerKAT data was processed using the South African computing facility i.e. IDIA, and exploited to make ground-breaking discoveries. However, to process MeerKAT data on UK’s IRIS computing facility requires new implementation of the MeerKAT pipeline. This paper focuses on how to transfer MeerKAT data from the South African site to UK’s IRIS systems for processing. We discuss about our RapifXfer Data transfer framework for transferring the MeerKAT data from South Africa to the UK, and the MeerKAT job processing framework pertaining to the UK’s IRIS resources. Keywords Big Data · MeerKAT · Square Kilometre Array · Telescope · Data Analysis · Imaging Introduction The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will be the world’s largest telescope, but once built it comes with its huge data challenges. The SKA instrument sites are in Australia and South Africa. This paper focuses on the South African SKA precursor MeerKAT, in particular on its data processing, calibration, and imaging using the UK IRIS resources. MeerKAT data are initially hosted by IDIA (Inter-University Institute for Data-Intensive Astronomy; [1]), which itself provides data storage and a data-intensive research cloud facility to service the MeerKAT science community in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning Talks Data Science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of Transients Catarina Alves
    Data science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning talks Data science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of transients Catarina Alves PhD @ Supervisors: ● Prof Hiranya Peiris ● Dr Jason McEwen [email protected] Supervised Learning Classification Unbalanced data Non representative data catarina-alves Catarina-Alves Unsupervised Learning Real time classification Anomaly detection Large datasets 2 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Adrian Bevan Particle physics experimentalist with a keen interest in DS & AI Parameter estimation: ● 2 decades of likelihood fitting experience spanning NA48, BaBar and ATLAS experiments; currently using ML on the ATLAS and MoEDAL experiments @ LHC. ● Latest relevant work: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0392 Machine learning: ● Broad interest in algorithms: domains of validity to understand what to use when and why to optimise the use of algorithms for a given problem domain. Have used SVMs, BDTs, MLPs, CNNs, Deep Networks, KNN for analysis work. ● Working on understanding why algorithms make a given inference or decision based on input feature space (explainability and interpretability). ● Want to explore unsupervised learning and bayesian networks when an appropriate problem presents itself. Have taught or currently teach data science and machine learning undergrad and grad courses. [email protected] 3 Data science for Physics & Astronomy David Berman 4 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Richard Bielby 5 Data science for Nachiketa Chakraborty Physics & Astronomy
    [Show full text]
  • C-Band All Sky Survey (C-BASS)
    C-Band All Sky Survey (C-BASS) J. P. Leahy (PI, Manchester), M. E. Jones (PI, Oxford) Clive Dickinson (JPL) AIMS: • Definitive survey of Galactic synchrotron radiation and its polarization • Anchor for synchrotron emission in future CMB polarimetry experiments up to CMBPOL. • Prototype for possible ground-based surveys at frequencies up to CMB band: 10, 15, 30… GHz • New window on Galactic magnetic field and cosmic rays BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 Galactic foregrounds WMAP polarized brightness: 23 GHz, 4° beam • Sky is full of polarized interstellar synchrotron emission – 91% of pixels detected at this resolution • All components have significant spectral variations We must have more measurements than parameters! BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 Foreground brightness • Smoothing removes emission that fluctuates on scales smaller than the beam – E.g. CMB ‘E-modes’ • Similar amplitudes at 2° and 4°: – Looking at signal, not noise! – Polarization has little small- scale structure. • (Foreground, high latitude) • At 4° resolution, polarization clearly detected in 91% of pixels • Median: 15 µK @ 22.5 GHz • Histogram of polarization values at 22.5 GHz, 4° beam, with various masks BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 4° Pol. Maps in other bands 33 GHz 41 GHz 61 GHz 94 GHz BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 C-BASS motivation • CMB polarization splits T into orthogonal modes: • E-modes fix optical depth to re-ionization – dramatic reduction in parameter degeneracy • B-modes define energy E scale of inflation • Obscured by Galactic B foreground emission – minimum at ~60 GHz – synchrotron below – dust above. BPOL workshop 27th October 2006 C-BASS motivation: 60 GHz • E-modes fix optical depth to re-ionization C-BASS – dramatic reduction in E parameter degeneracy 60 GHz • B-modes define energy scale of B inflation • Obscured by Galactic r = 0.1 foreground emission – minimum at ~60 GHz g in – synchrotron below s n e – dust above.
    [Show full text]