Final 2010 TWQI Or CWA Section 305(B) and 303(D) Integrated Laboratory Achieves NELAC Report Is Still in Draft Format

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final 2010 TWQI Or CWA Section 305(B) and 303(D) Integrated Laboratory Achieves NELAC Report Is Still in Draft Format 2010 BASIN HIGHLIGHTS REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY ISSUES THROUGHOUT THE Canadian and red RIVER BASINS The preparation of this report was financed through and in cooperation with Red river at us78 the Texas commission on environmental quality TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Preface 3 How water quality is monitored 4 We have the data, now what do we do with it 4 Common water quality parameters 5 An overview of the Canadian River basin Map of the Canadian river basin 6 An introduction to the Canadian river basin 7 Reach I 8 Reach ii 10 Reach iii 12 Reach iv 14 Reach v 16 An overview of the Red River basin Map of the red river basin 18 An Introduction to the Red river basin 19 Reach I 20 Reach I Upper 22 Reach ii 24 Reach iii 26 Reach iv 28 Reach v 30 Outreach and involvement 32 Recommendations 33 Conclusions 34 Beaver creek at SH25 2 preface AT A GLANCE he Texas Legislature, in 1991, enacted the Texas Clean Rivers Act (Senate Bill 818) in or- T der to assess water quality for each river basin in the state. From this, the Clean Rivers Pro- BRIEF HISTORY gram (CRP) was created and has become one of the most successful cooperative efforts between OF THE RED RIVER federal, state, and local agencies and the citizens of the State of Texas. It is implemented by the AUTHORITY OF TEXAS Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) through local partner agencies to achieve & THE CLEAN RIVERS the CRP’s primary goal of maintaining and improving the water quality in each river basin. The PROGRAM Red River Authority is the partner agency for both the Red and Canadian River Basins. A watershed management approach was selected as the best method to manage the State’s di- 1991 verse surface water resources. In order to achieve this, the Authority subdivided each basin into Entered into contract with TCEQ for the CRP. five reaches, or sub-watersheds, divided by natural hydrology and composed of classified and unclassified water body segments. The TCEQ identifies each of these classified segments in the 1996 Began monitoring and Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS). Data resulting from the collection and analy- sampling sites - Approximately 10. sis of water samples is used in the development of and compliance with these standards. 1999 An integral part of the CRP is the Basin Highlights Report (BHR). The reports are based on Environmental Services Division quality assured data as utilized in the Texas Water Quality Inventory and 303(d) List (TWQI). expanded including in-house laboratory. The TWQI is an assessment of the water quality data and is composed by the TCEQ every two 2003 years as required under the Federal Clean Waters Act (CWA) Sections 305(b) and 303(d) admin- Monitoring 36 sampling sites. istered by the Environmental Protection Agency. The 303(d) list identifies waters from the 2006 TWQI not meeting the uses designated in the TSWQS. The most recent TWQI may be accessed RRA relocated to new office and on the TCEQ’s website at: expanded lab facility. Monitoring 53 sampling sites. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/monitoring/water/quality/data/08twqi/twqi08.html. 2008 This year’s BHR differs from those written in years past. In 2009, the RRA produced the Basin Laboratory receives NELAC Interim Summary Report, which included extensive technical data analysis based on the final 2008 Certification TWQI. This report utilizes the same information; however, the time frame is from September 2009 2008 through August 2009. The final 2010 TWQI or CWA section 305(b) and 303(d) Integrated Laboratory achieves NELAC Report is still in draft format. This BHR is brief in its extent and focuses mainly on water body Certification. Monitoring 49 sites. impairments and concerns. Therefore, it is suggested that the reader view the 2009 Summary Re- port of the Canadian and Red River Basins for more in depth information. It may be found on the RRA website at: www.rra.dst.tx.us. 3 INTRODUCTION HOW IS WATER WE HAVE THE DATA, NOW WHAT use, the water body is said to be QUALITY MONITORED? DO WE DO WITH IT? “impaired.” Water bodies may also have ater quality can be evaluated us- he State of Texas has designated five “concerns” if short-term data show ele- W ing physical characteristics, T water use categories including: vated levels. A “concern” can also indi- chemical characteristics, or a combination aquatic life, contact recreation, fish con- cate a potential water quality issue where of the two. Parameters, such as, dissolved sumption, public water supply, and gen- there is either an insufficient amount of oxygen, bacteria, suspended solids, and eral use. Each category has numerical cri- data to compare to or no numeric criteria chlorides, are just a few examples of how teria associated with it depending on its (limits) have been established. water quality can be measured. Through- designated use. For example, water desig- Some examples of water quality parame- out the Canadian and Red River Basins nated for public water supply will have ters commonly used to evaluate water there are several entities who participate in more stringent requirements compared to a quality are listed in the table on page 5. routine water quality monitoring efforts: water body designated for general use. Collecting field data Sweetwater Creek at Us83 • Red River Authority (RRA) All available data collected during moni- • City of Sherman toring events are used to develop appropri- • Texas Commission on Environmental ate water quality standards (WQS) for wa- Quality (TCEQ) ter bodies across Texas. WQS use a pe- • United States Geological Survey riod of record data, many years if available (USGS) to develop appropriate standards for water bodies across Texas. The TWQI differs Joint efforts and adherence to Quality As- from this using a seven-year assessment surance Project Plans (QAPPs) enable data window that progressively moves every collected from various organizations state- two years. Current datasets are then com- wide to be used in collaborative efforts to pared to these standards to evaluate water assess the water quality and develop water quality. Data may either support, or not quality standards for streams, rivers, and support the designated use. If data do not lakes. show good water quality to support the 4 Common Water Quality Parameters FIELD PARAMETERS Collected and processed in the field laboratory. Results are expressed in mg/L except where noted. PARAMETER DEFINITION The hydrogen-ion activity of water caused by the breakdown of water molecules and the presence of dissolved acids and bases. pH pH determines whether a water body is acidic, neutral, or basic. The pH of the water may affect the toxicity of many substances. Re- sults are expressed in standard units. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) - the oxygen that is freely available in water. DO is vital to fish and other aquatic life and the prevention of Dissolved Oxygen odors. Traditionally, adequate ranges of dissolved oxygen levels have been accepted as the single most important indicator of a wa- ter body's ability to support desirable aquatic life. The current indicator bacteria to determine if the water body is suitable for contact recreation. It is expressed in MPN (most probable number) per 100mL of water. High results of an E. coli test can indicate a potential pollution problem. E. coli is used as an indicator Bacteria (E. coli) because it is found in warm blooded animal fecal matter and could indicate potentially harmful conditions to people like pathogen exposure. CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Collected in the field but processed in the laboratory. Results are expressed in mg/L except where noted. PARAMETER DEFINITION Naturally occurring in surface and wastewater, and is produced by the breakdown of compounds containing organic nitrogen. Ammonia Elevated ammonia levels are a good indicator of organic pollution. A photosynthetic pigment which is found in all green plants. The concentration of chlorophyll-a is used to estimate phytoplankton Chlorophyll-a biomass in surface water. Results are expressed in micrograms per liter. Nutrients can stimulate the production of chlorophyll-a, leading to elevated levels which can indicate a problem. Is a soluble form of phosphorus (PO4) that is applied to urban and agricultural land as fertilizers and is often found in storm water Orthophosphorus run-off. An essential nutrient to the growth of organisms and can be the nutrient that limits the primary productivity in water. An excessive Total Phosphorus amount from wastewater, agricultural drainage, and certain industrial wastes, also contributes to the eutrophication of lakes and other water bodies. Phosphorus is commonly known as a man-made pollutant. Total Dissolved Solids TDS - A measure of solids, both organic and inorganic, dissolved in water. Usually dissolved into waters from rocks and soils containing gypsum, iron sulfides, and other sulfur compounds. Sulfides are Sulfate widely distributed in nature and in high concentration, sulfate can affect drinking water. One of the major inorganic ions in water and wastewater. Concentrations can be increased by industrial processes. High chloride Chloride concentrations can affect metallic objects, growing plants, and make water unsuitable for drinking. Chloride compounds, often known as salts, can be an indicator of natural or manmade pollution, as in the case of oil field brines. 5 Canadian river basin 6 An introduction to the Canadian River basin he Canadian River Basin includes all or parts of 15 counties support aquatic life and recreational uses. However, there are two T in the Texas Panhandle. Beginning at the northeastern major issues that have long affected the Canadian River Basin. slopes of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains in New Mexico as a One is the ongoing drought that has been a problem since the mid tributary to the Arkansas River, the Canadian River eventually 1990’s.
Recommended publications
  • RFP No. 212F for Endangered Species Research Projects for the Prairie Chub
    1 RFP No. 212f for Endangered Species Research Projects for the Prairie Chub Final Report Contributing authors: David S. Ruppel, V. Alex Sotola, Ozlem Ablak Gurbuz, Noland H. Martin, and Timothy H. Bonner Addresses: Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 (DSR, VAS, NHM, THB) Kirkkonaklar Anatolian High School, Turkish Ministry of Education, Ankara, Turkey (OAG) Principal investigators: Timothy H. Bonner and Noland H. Martin Email: [email protected], [email protected] Date: July 31, 2017 Style: American Fisheries Society Funding sources: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Turkish Ministry of Education- Visiting Scholar Program (OAG) Summary Four hundred mesohabitats were sampled from 36 sites and 20 reaches within the upper Red River drainage from September 2015 through September 2016. Fishes (N = 36,211) taken from the mesohabitats represented 14 families and 49 species with the most abundant species consisting of Red Shiner Cyprinella lutrensis, Red River Shiner Notropis bairdi, Plains Minnow Hybognathus placitus, and Western Mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Red River Pupfish Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (a species of greatest conservation need, SGCN) and Plains Killifish Fundulus zebrinus were more abundant within prairie streams (e.g., swift and shallow runs with sand and silt substrates) with high specific conductance. Red River Shiner (SGCN), Prairie Chub Macrhybopsis australis (SGCN), and Plains Minnow were more abundant within prairie 2 streams with lower specific conductance. The remaining 44 species of fishes were more abundant in non-prairie stream habitats with shallow to deep waters, which were more common in eastern tributaries of the upper Red River drainage and Red River mainstem. Prairie Chubs comprised 1.3% of the overall fish community and were most abundant in Pease River and Wichita River.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Monitoring and Educational Program in the Red River Basin
    Stream Monitoring and Educational U.S. Department of the Interior Program in the Red River Basin, U.S. Geological Survey Texas, 1996–97 100 o 101 o 5 AMARILLO NORTH FORK 102 o RED RIVER 103 o A S LT 35o F ORK RED R IV ER 1 4 2 PRAIRIE DOG TOWN PEASE 3 99 o WICHITA FORK RED RIVER 7 FALLS CHARLIE 6 RIVE R o o 34 W 8 98 9 I R o LAKE CHIT 21 ED 97 A . TEXOMA o VE o 10 11 R 25 96 RI R 95 16 19 18 20 DENISON 17 28 14 15 23 24 27 29 22 26 30 12,13 LAKE PARIS KEMP LAKE LAKE KICKAPOO ARROWHEAD TEXARKANA EXPLANATION 0 40 80 120 MILES Reach 1—Lower Red River (mainstem) Basin Red River Basin in Texas Reach 2—Wichita River Basin NEW OKLAHOMA Reach 3—Pease River Basin MEXICO ARKANSAS Reach 4—Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River Basin Reach 5—North Fork and Salt Fork Red River TEXAS Basins 12 LOUISIANA USGS streamflow-gaging and water-quality station and reference number (table 1) 22 USGS streamflow-gaging station and reference number (table 1) Figure 1. Location of Red River Basin, Texas, and stream-monitoring stations. This fact sheet presents the 1996–97 Texas Panhandle, and becomes the Texas- 200,000 acre-feet are in the basin (fig. 1): stream monitoring and outreach activities Oklahoma boundary. It then flows Lake Kemp, Lake Kickapoo, Lake of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), through southwestern Arkansas and into Arrowhead, and Lake Texoma.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination File
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: SH 203 (Old SH 52) Bridge at Salt Fork of the Red River Other name/site number: State Highway 52 Bridge at Salt Fork of the Red River Name of related multiple property listing: Historic Road Infrastructure of Texas 2. Location Street & number: Texas State Highway 203 at Salt Fork of the Red River City or town: Wellington State: Texas County: Collingsworth Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Bowls of Fire Get Bragging Rights and a Handsome Keeping Your Community Strong
    THE CLARENDON 11.26.2015 The Texas Panhandle’s First Newspaper. Established 1878. Enterprise THE CLARENDON NEWS & THE DONLEY COUNTY LEADER www.ClarendonLive.com Single 00 Courthouse lighting, chili cookoff this Saturday Copy $1 The Christmas season will start endonLive.com. community. Chili Challenge with a chance to win plaque, and the ballot of one lucky in a big way in Clarendon this week- Small Business Saturday began Saturday’s highlight will be the $250 in Clarendon Cash. taster will receive $250 in Clarendon THIS WEEK end with merchant sales, the light- in 2010 when American Express second annual Courthouse Light- Chili Challenge ballots and a Cash from the Chamber. ing of the Courthouse, and the third founded it to help small businesses ing Celebration, beginning at 5 p.m. list of participating merchants will Also on Saturday night, the 2 Shopping at small annual Chili Challenge. get more exposure during one of the with an appearance by Santa Claus be available for $5 each from the VFW Ladies Auxiliary will hold a businesses can make a big Local merchants are ready to biggest shopping weekends of the and caroling featuring local chil- Clarendon Visitor Center at Mulkey soup dinner at the Clarendon Lions impact this holiday season. help you find something for every- year. dren’s groups. The formal lighting Theatre immediately following the Hall for $5 per person featuring 4 Peggy recalls past holiday one on your Christmas list with their According to small business will be at 6 p.m. Courthouse Lighting. Chili tasters homemade chicken noodle or potato cooking disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • [Short Report Title]
    Regional Water Plan – Panhandle Water Planning Area VOLUME I January, 2000 Prepared for the Panhandle Water Planning Group through a contract with the Panhandle Regional Water Plan Regional Planning Panhandle Water Planning Area Commission Amarillo, Texas PPC99134 Prepared by: Freese and Nichols, Inc. 4055 International Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth, TX 76109 817/735-7300 The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station The Texas Agricultural Extension Service USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Bureau of Economic Geology TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Chapter No. Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 1.0 SENATE BILL 1 1-1 1.1 REGIONAL WATER PLANNING AREA 1-3 1.1.1 Population 1-4 1.1.2 Economic Activities 1-8 1.1.3 Climate 1-9 1.2 Major Water Providers 1-11 1.3 Sources of Water 1-12 1.3.1 Groundwater 1-12 1.3.2 Surface Water 1-20 1.4 Current Water Users and Demand Centers 1-25 1.4.1 Municipal Use 1-25 1.4.2 Industrial Use 1-26 1.4.3 Agricultural Use 1-28 1.5 Natural Resources 1-32 1.5.1 Natural Region 1-32 1.5.2 Regional Vegetation 1-34 1.5.3 Regional Geology 1-37 1.5.4 Mineral Resources 1-37 1.5.5 Soils 1-39 1.5.6 Wetlands 1-41 1.5.7 Aquatic Resources 1-42 1.5.8 Wildlife Resources 1-43 1.6 Threats and Constraints to Water Supply 1-44 1.7 Existing Programs and Goals 1-47 1.7.1 Federal Programs 1-47 1.7.2 Interstate Programs 1-48 1.7.3 State Programs 1-49 1.7.4 Local Programs 1-51 1.7.5 Other Information 1-52 2.0 CURRENT AND PROJECTED POPULATION AND WATER DEMAND FOR THE REGION 2-1 2.1 Population 2-3 2.2 Historical Water Use and Projected Water Demand 2-6 2.3 Major Water Providers 2-16 3.0 EVALUATION OF ADEQUACY OF CURRENT WATER SUPPLIES 3-1 3.1 Groundwater Supplies 3-2 3.1.1 Major Aquifers 3-5 3.1.2 Minor Aquifers 3-7 3.2 Surface Water Supplies 3-10 i TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Chapter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Stations in Texas, January 1989
    INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER STATIONS IN TEXAS, JANUARY 1989 Compiled by Jack Rawson, E.R. Carrillo, and H.D. Buckner U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 89-265 Austin, Texas 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports 8011 Cameron Road Federal Center, Bldg. 810 Austin, Texas 78753 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Introduction.......................................................... 1 Definition of terms................................................... 2 Availability of data .................................................. 3 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Map showing the locations of active surface-water stations in Texas, January 1989.................................... In pocket 2. Map showing the locations of active partia1-record surface- water stations in Texas, January 1989..................... In pocket TABLES Table 1. Streamflow, quality, reservoir-content, and partial-record stations maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with State and Federal agencies............... 5 111 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER STATIONS IN TEXAS JANUARY 1989 Compi1ed by Jack Rawson, E.R. Carrillo, and H.D. Buckner INTRODUCTION The U.S. Geological Survey's investigations of the water resources of Texas are conducted in cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board, river authorities, cities, counties, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Interna­ tional Boundary and Water Commission, and others. Investigations are under the general direction of C.W. Boning, District Chief, Texas District. The Texas District office is located at 8011A Cameron Road, Austin, Texas 78753.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Community Structure of Riverine
    FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF RIVERINE ORGANISMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPERILED SPECIES MANAGEMENT by David S. Ruppel, M.S. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Aquatic Resources and Integrative Biology May 2019 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair Noland H. Martin Joseph A. Veech Kenneth G. Ostrand James A. Stoeckel COPYRIGHT by David S. Ruppel 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, David S. Ruppel, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank my major advisor, Timothy H. Bonner, who has been a great mentor throughout my time at Texas State University. He has passed along his vast knowledge and has provided exceptional professional guidance and support with will benefit me immensely as I continue to pursue an academic career. I also thank my committee members Dr. Noland H. Martin, Dr. Joseph A. Veech, Dr. Kenneth G. Ostrand, and Dr. James A. Stoeckel who provided great comments on my dissertation and have helped in shaping manuscripts that will be produced in the future from each one of my chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Permit Availability Report
    Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan 2012 Update Water Supply Permit Availability Report Revised October 2011 Prepared by CDM under a cooperative agreement between the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Contents Section 1 - Water Supply Permit Availability Analyses Section 2 - Analysis of Water Available for Current and Future Permitting 2.1 Water Use Permitting in Oklahoma ......................................................... 2-1 2.2 Groundwater Permitting Availability ........................................................ 2-2 2.2.1 Methodology .............................................................................. 2-2 2.2.2 Results ....................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Surface Water Permitting Availability .................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Methodology ............................................................................ 2-10 2.3.2 Difference in USACE Reservoir Contracts and Permitting .... 2-12 2.3.3 Protecting Yield above Federal Reservoirs ............................ 2-12 2.3.4 Results ..................................................................................... 2-12 Section 3 - Interstate River Compacts 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Canadian River Compact (1950) ............................................................ 3-2 3.2.1 Purposes ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In
    CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Geography CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jonathan M. Smith Committee Members, Peter J. Hugill Christian Brannstrom Bradford P. Wilcox Head of Department, Douglas J. Sherman May 2007 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use in East Central Texas Since the Time of Anglo Settlement. (May 2007) Wendy Winborn Patzewitsch, B.A., Trinity University; M.S., Southern Methodist University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jonathan M. Smith Patterns and perceptions of water use have changed since Anglo settlement in Texas in the early nineteenth century. Change has not been constant, gradual, or linear, but rather has occurred in fits and spurts. This pattern of punctuated equilibrium in water use regimes is the central finding of this dissertation. Water use is examined in terms of built, organizational, and institutional inertias that resist change in the cultural landscape. Change occurs only when forced by crisis and results in water management at an increasing scale. Perception is critical in forcing response to crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Report for the W.C. Austin Project
    APPRAISAL REPORT Water Supply Augmentation W.C. Austin Project, Oklahoma U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Oklahoma-Texas Area Office Austin, Texas March 2005 ← COVER Altus Dam at sunset, July 2004. Photograph courtesy of Bureau of Reclamation, Austin, Texas. Digitally rendered into watercolor. Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. APPRAISAL REPORT Water Supply Augmentation W.C. Austin Project, Oklahoma U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Oklahoma-Texas Area Office Austin, Texas March 2005 Contents Page Executive Summary ............................................................................................. i PART ONE: Background .................................................................................... 1 Authority ......................................................................................................................1 Purpose.........................................................................................................................1 The W.C. Austin Project ..............................................................................................1 Prior Studies
    [Show full text]