DOCSLIB.ORG

Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 7 -Lower Mississippi River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 7 -Lower Mississippi River Basin Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 7 -Lower Mississippi River Basin Index of Surface-Water Recorc1s to September 30, 1967 Part 7 -Lower Mississippi River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y C I R C U L A R 577 United States Department of the Interior STEWART l. UDALL, Secretary Geological Survey William T. Pecora, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 7 -lower Mississippi River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth INTRODL1CTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Lower Mississippi River basin for which record"' have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedet:> Geological Survey Circular 507. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consis':ing of several volumes, including one each for the Statesof Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divided into 1-l parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published in 14 volumes, one for each of the parts. From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were pur !ished annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6, The boundaries of the various pans are shown on the map in figure 1. Beginning in 1461, the annual series of water-supply papers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year series. Records for the period 1%1-65 will be published in a series of water-supply papers using the same 14 part divis;on for the 48 States, but most parts will be further subdivided into two or more volumes. In order to meet interim re'luire­ ments, beginning in 1461, local offices issue reports annually containing streamflow records for the State or States within the local district. In addition to the continuous-record gaging stations, this index includes crest-stage and low-flow partial-record stations. A continuous-record station is a gaging station on a stream or reservoir for which the discharge, stage, or contents is published on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis for a continuous period of time. A crest-stage partial-record station is a streamflow station for which only the annual maximum discharge is published over a period of years for use in floodflow analyses. A low-flow partial-record station is a streamflow station for which only discharge measurements made at base flow, when streamflow is primarily from ground-water storage, are published. Measurements are generally collected over a period of five years or more for use in low-flow analyses. Discharge measuremen~s have been made at many sites and published as miscellaneous measurements. Such measurements are not included in this index except those made in earlier years at sites now classified as low-flow partial-record stations. Explanation of reference marks is given at the end of the index. An alphabetical list of streams, lakes, and reservoirs is given at the end of this circular. DOWNSTREAM ORDER The stations in this index are listed in the downstream order used 1n the series of water-supply papers on surface­ water supply of the United States since 1951. Starting at the headwater of each stream, all stations are listed in a downstream direction. Tributary streams are indicated by indention and are inserted between main-stem stations in the order in which they enter the main stream. To indicate the rank of any tributary on which a record is available and the stream to which it is immediately tributary, each indention in the listing of stations represents one rank. A stream name, only, is inserted where necessary for the purpose of showing the proper rank or order of tributaries. STATION NAMES Station names are given in their most recently published form. Parentheses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or as an alternate name. Parenthetical explanations are also used to indicate that a stream of a different name is the head of the main stream by use of "(head of River)" and that the name of the main stream has changed by use of "(continu~tion of ----- River)." 1 2 STATION NUMBER As an added means of identification, each continuous- and partial-record station has been assigned a stati-:m number. The numbers have been assigned in the ~e downstream order used in this index. In assigning station number, gaps were left to allow for new stations that may be established; hence the numbers are not consecutive. Tl ~ complete number for each station includes the part number, which is omitted in this index. The number given consists of only the essential digits of the complete number. For example, for a station with the complete number 07-0145.00, the station number shown in this index is 0145. DRAINAGE AREA The drainage area, in square miles, is the latest figure published or otherwise available at this time. Under "Periods of record" are three columns. The first column, "Daily or monthly figures," shows the periods of record for continuous-record gaging stations. The dates givenarethe calendar years in which records bega1' or ended; breaks of less than a year are not shown. For example, if a record began in October 1923, ended in Aprill932, began again in March 1933, and ended in September 1944, the period of record would be shown as 1923-44. The second column, "Annual peaks," shows the period of record for crest-stage partial-record stations. The dates given are the water years for which the annual maximum discharge is available. The water year begins Oc<:ober 1 and ends September 30. In listing the water year, only one date is shown; for example, 1952 stands for the water year October 1, 1951, to September 30, 1952. The third column, "Low-flow measurements," shows the periodof record for low-flow partial-record str~"ions. The dates given are the water years in which base-flow measurements were made at low-flow partial-record stations; breaks of less than two years are not shown. Prior to the 1958 water year, such measurements were published in tal , es headed "Miscellaneous discharge measurements" or "Discharge measurements at sites other than gaging stations." Many discharge measurements have been made at miscellaneous sites which are not listed in this index because the data collected were not sufficient to qualify the site as a low-flow partial-record st~tion. A date followed by only a dash shows that the station was continued in operation beyond September 30, 1~67. A date followed by a period indicates discontinuance. A date followed by a semicolon indicates a break in the collection of records. Periods of record for the same continuous-record station published by other agencies are listed only when they are for periods not published in reports of the Geological Survey. These periods are indicated by symbols anc' footnotes. Records collected by other agencies are included only for stations for which there is some record p·rblished in Geological Survey reports. ·Note --Inaexes for Alaska and Hawaii are ',, contained in separate circulars for those States. ' ...... J Figure 1.--Msp of th~ 00ntPrminous United States showing the l4·parts covered by indexes of surface-water records to September 30, 1967. The part~ covered by this index is shaded. · ., Periods of record Station name. Station Drainage area ~-----------------------------T-----------------T-------------------------- number (sq mi) Daily or monthly figures Annual peaks Low-flow measurements (calendar years) (water years) (water years) LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN 7- Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo .................... 0100 a701,000 1861- GRAVOIS CREEK BASIN Gravois Creek near Kirkwood, Mo ..................... 0101 1961- MERAMEC RIVER BASIN Meramec River near Salem, Mo ....•..........•......... 0103 . .. .. .. .. .. 1961-64 . Meramec River at Cook Station, Mo ................... 0103.5 199 1965- Meramec River near St. James, Mo .................... 0104 ............................ 1953;1957;1962- Meramec Spring near St. James (Meramec), Mo .....•.. 0105 1903-6;1921-29. Meramec River near Meramec, Mo ...................... 0110 340 1903-6. Dry Fork: Spring Creek: Love Creek near Salem, Mo ..................... 0112 .89 1955- Lenox Branch near Rolla, Mo .............•....•... 0113 6.63 1949- Little Dry Fork: Green Acre Branch near Rolla, Mo .............. 0115 .622 1947- Behmke Branch near Rolla, Mo .................. 0120 1.05 1948-59 .................... 1960- Dry Fork near St. James, Mo .....................•.. 0120.5 370 1903*;1943-45 .............. 1963- Meramec River near Steelville, Mo ................... 0130 781 1916-33*b;1922- Huzzah Creek at Dillard, Mo ....................... 0131 a92 1944-45c ................... 1961- Huzzah Creek near Steelville, Mo .................. 0140 1942-43;1946-47; 1951;1961- Courtois Creek at Berryman, Mo .................. 0142 173 1944-45c ................... 1961- Meramec River near Sullivan, Mo .................. '... 0145 1,475 1921-33;1943- Indian Creek near St. Clair, Mo ................... 0148 ............................ 1965- Bourbeuse River near St. James, Mo ..•....••........ 0150 21.3 1947- Lanes Fork near Rolla, Mo ....................... 0155 .225 1952- Lanes Fork near Vichy, Mo ....................... 0157 24.1 ............................ 1944-45;1948- Bourbeuse River near High Gate, Mo ................ 0157.2 135 1965- Bourbeuse River near Owensville, Mo ............... 0157.5 1943;1946-48;1962- Dry Fork near Ow~nsville, Mo .................... 0157.6 1962- Redoak Creek: Soap Creek: Langenberg Branch near Rosebud, Mo .......... 0158 .67 1960- Bourbeuse River near Spring Bluff, Mo ............. 0160 608 1943-c ..................... 1962- Bourbeuse River at Union, Mo ...................... 0165 808 1916-*b•1921- Meramec River at Robertsville, Mo ....•..............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP No. 212F for Endangered Species Research Projects for the Prairie Chub
    1 RFP No. 212f for Endangered Species Research Projects for the Prairie Chub Final Report Contributing authors: David S. Ruppel, V. Alex Sotola, Ozlem Ablak Gurbuz, Noland H. Martin, and Timothy H. Bonner Addresses: Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 (DSR, VAS, NHM, THB) Kirkkonaklar Anatolian High School, Turkish Ministry of Education, Ankara, Turkey (OAG) Principal investigators: Timothy H. Bonner and Noland H. Martin Email: [email protected], [email protected] Date: July 31, 2017 Style: American Fisheries Society Funding sources: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Turkish Ministry of Education- Visiting Scholar Program (OAG) Summary Four hundred mesohabitats were sampled from 36 sites and 20 reaches within the upper Red River drainage from September 2015 through September 2016. Fishes (N = 36,211) taken from the mesohabitats represented 14 families and 49 species with the most abundant species consisting of Red Shiner Cyprinella lutrensis, Red River Shiner Notropis bairdi, Plains Minnow Hybognathus placitus, and Western Mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Red River Pupfish Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (a species of greatest conservation need, SGCN) and Plains Killifish Fundulus zebrinus were more abundant within prairie streams (e.g., swift and shallow runs with sand and silt substrates) with high specific conductance. Red River Shiner (SGCN), Prairie Chub Macrhybopsis australis (SGCN), and Plains Minnow were more abundant within prairie 2 streams with lower specific conductance. The remaining 44 species of fishes were more abundant in non-prairie stream habitats with shallow to deep waters, which were more common in eastern tributaries of the upper Red River drainage and Red River mainstem. Prairie Chubs comprised 1.3% of the overall fish community and were most abundant in Pease River and Wichita River.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Monitoring and Educational Program in the Red River Basin
    Stream Monitoring and Educational U.S. Department of the Interior Program in the Red River Basin, U.S. Geological Survey Texas, 1996–97 100 o 101 o 5 AMARILLO NORTH FORK 102 o RED RIVER 103 o A S LT 35o F ORK RED R IV ER 1 4 2 PRAIRIE DOG TOWN PEASE 3 99 o WICHITA FORK RED RIVER 7 FALLS CHARLIE 6 RIVE R o o 34 W 8 98 9 I R o LAKE CHIT 21 ED 97 A . TEXOMA o VE o 10 11 R 25 96 RI R 95 16 19 18 20 DENISON 17 28 14 15 23 24 27 29 22 26 30 12,13 LAKE PARIS KEMP LAKE LAKE KICKAPOO ARROWHEAD TEXARKANA EXPLANATION 0 40 80 120 MILES Reach 1—Lower Red River (mainstem) Basin Red River Basin in Texas Reach 2—Wichita River Basin NEW OKLAHOMA Reach 3—Pease River Basin MEXICO ARKANSAS Reach 4—Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River Basin Reach 5—North Fork and Salt Fork Red River TEXAS Basins 12 LOUISIANA USGS streamflow-gaging and water-quality station and reference number (table 1) 22 USGS streamflow-gaging station and reference number (table 1) Figure 1. Location of Red River Basin, Texas, and stream-monitoring stations. This fact sheet presents the 1996–97 Texas Panhandle, and becomes the Texas- 200,000 acre-feet are in the basin (fig. 1): stream monitoring and outreach activities Oklahoma boundary. It then flows Lake Kemp, Lake Kickapoo, Lake of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), through southwestern Arkansas and into Arrowhead, and Lake Texoma.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination File
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: SH 203 (Old SH 52) Bridge at Salt Fork of the Red River Other name/site number: State Highway 52 Bridge at Salt Fork of the Red River Name of related multiple property listing: Historic Road Infrastructure of Texas 2. Location Street & number: Texas State Highway 203 at Salt Fork of the Red River City or town: Wellington State: Texas County: Collingsworth Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Bowls of Fire Get Bragging Rights and a Handsome Keeping Your Community Strong
    THE CLARENDON 11.26.2015 The Texas Panhandle’s First Newspaper. Established 1878. Enterprise THE CLARENDON NEWS & THE DONLEY COUNTY LEADER www.ClarendonLive.com Single 00 Courthouse lighting, chili cookoff this Saturday Copy $1 The Christmas season will start endonLive.com. community. Chili Challenge with a chance to win plaque, and the ballot of one lucky in a big way in Clarendon this week- Small Business Saturday began Saturday’s highlight will be the $250 in Clarendon Cash. taster will receive $250 in Clarendon THIS WEEK end with merchant sales, the light- in 2010 when American Express second annual Courthouse Light- Chili Challenge ballots and a Cash from the Chamber. ing of the Courthouse, and the third founded it to help small businesses ing Celebration, beginning at 5 p.m. list of participating merchants will Also on Saturday night, the 2 Shopping at small annual Chili Challenge. get more exposure during one of the with an appearance by Santa Claus be available for $5 each from the VFW Ladies Auxiliary will hold a businesses can make a big Local merchants are ready to biggest shopping weekends of the and caroling featuring local chil- Clarendon Visitor Center at Mulkey soup dinner at the Clarendon Lions impact this holiday season. help you find something for every- year. dren’s groups. The formal lighting Theatre immediately following the Hall for $5 per person featuring 4 Peggy recalls past holiday one on your Christmas list with their According to small business will be at 6 p.m. Courthouse Lighting. Chili tasters homemade chicken noodle or potato cooking disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 --~ Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 657 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y C I R C U L A R 657 Washington 1972 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretory Geological Survey W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Lower Mississippi River basin for which recorc's have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods through September 30, 1970, It supersedes Geological Survey Circular 577, It was updated by personnel of the Data Reports Unit, Water Resources Divisior. Geo­ logical Survey. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consif'ting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divid~d into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published inl4volumes,oneforeachof the parts, From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were published annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6, Beginning in 1961, theannualseriesofwater-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year series, and records for the period 1961-65 were published in 37 volumes, there being 2 or more volumes for each of 11 parts and one each for parts 10, 13, 14, 15 (Alaska), and 16 (Hawaii and other Pacific areas).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report
    2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following for their contribution to the 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report: Lucas Gregory, PhD Texas A&M Agrilife, Texas Water Resources Institute Lake O’ the Pines National Water Quality Initiative Phase I Update . Laura-Ashley Overdyke Executive Director, Caddo Lake Institute 2018 Updates on the Paddlefish Project: Caddo Lake Institute . Tim Bister Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Invasive Species Control Activities in 2017 . Adam Whisenant and Greg Conley Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Dewatering Below Lake O’ the Pines Ferrell's Bridge Dam PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY The preparation of this report was financed through funding from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. i 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress
    Prepared in cooperation with the Northeast Texas Municipal Water District and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous, Big Cypress Basin, Northeastern Texas, 2010–11 Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: Top right, Cypress knees, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Top left, Electrofishing from a barge, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by Erin C. Sewell, U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom right, Electrofishing from a boat, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by Justin A. McInnis, U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom left, Measuring physical characteristics, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 26, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover, Cypress tree near Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous, Big Cypress Basin, Northeastern Texas, 2010–11 By Christopher L. Braun and James B. Moring Prepared in cooperation with the Northeast Texas Municipal Water District and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 90-16, 47 P., 1 Pl
    LIBRARY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION OLYMPIA, WASHiNGTON 98504 METAL MINES OF WASHINGTON- PRELIMINARY REPORT by ROBERT E. DERKEY NANCY L. JOSEPH and RAYMOND LASMANIS WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES OPEN FILE REPORT 90-18 NOVEMBER 1990 This report has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Division of Geology and Earth Resources standards and nomenclature. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF 1, Natural Resources Brian Boyle - Commissioner ot Public Lands Art Stearns - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources Raymond Lasmanis. State Geologist LIBRARY DEPA.RTl'\~ENT OF NATURAL RFSOURCES GEOLOGY •v,:o [AF:TH RESOURCES DIVISION OL Yfl,PIA, ',-.;/,JH1i\JGTON 98504 METAL MINES OF WASHINGTON- PRELIMINARY REPORT by ROBERT E. DERKEY NANCY L. JOSEPH and RAYMOND LASMANIS WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES OPEN FILE REPORT 90-18 NOVEMBER 1990 This repon has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Division of Geology and Eanh Resources standards and nomenclature. CONTENTS • Page Page Kelly Camp 368 ................. 52 Introduction ... 1 Kettle 339 .................53 Key East 309 ...••...••...•••.54 County Site Knob Hill 323 .................55 and site name number Lancaster 310 ................. 57 Last Chance 324 ............•....58 BENTON Little Cove 325 ......••..••.....59 Benian Island placer 303 .................. 5 Lone Pine 326 •••......•....... 60 Gone Busted placer 304 .................. 6 Lone Star and CHELAN Washington 311 .................61 Longstreet 305 ..•....•...••.•.. 62 Blewett Iron 562 .................. 7 Messenger 356 ................. 63 Blewett camp 557 .................. 8 Meteor 365 •.•..•.•.•..•••.. 64 Cannon 558 .................. 9 Minnehaha 312 ................. 65 Crown Point 564 .•....•••.....•.. 11 Morning Glor 327 ..•...•...••..... 66 Dick 565 ....••••...••.•.. 12 Morning Star 328 ..•...•.•.•...•.. 67 Holden 555 ................. 13 Mount Tolman 307 •....•...•...•••.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G4127 NORTHWESTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G4127 FEATURES, ETC. .C8 Custer National Forest .L4 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail .L5 Little Missouri River .M3 Madison Aquifer .M5 Missouri River .M52 Missouri River [wild & scenic river] .O7 Oregon National Historic Trail. Oregon Trail .W5 Williston Basin [geological basin] .Y4 Yellowstone River 1305 G4132 WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, G4132 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .D4 Des Moines River .R4 Red River of the North 1306 G4142 MINNESOTA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G4142 .A2 Afton State Park .A4 Alexander, Lake .A42 Alexander Chain .A45 Alice Lake [Lake County] .B13 Baby Lake .B14 Bad Medicine Lake .B19 Ball Club Lake [Itasca County] .B2 Balsam Lake [Itasca County] .B22 Banning State Park .B25 Barrett Lake [Grant County] .B28 Bass Lake [Faribault County] .B29 Bass Lake [Itasca County : Deer River & Bass Brook townships] .B3 Basswood Lake [MN & Ont.] .B32 Basswood River [MN & Ont.] .B323 Battle Lake .B325 Bay Lake [Crow Wing County] .B33 Bear Head Lake State Park .B333 Bear Lake [Itasca County] .B339 Belle Taine, Lake .B34 Beltrami Island State Forest .B35 Bemidji, Lake .B37 Bertha Lake .B39 Big Birch Lake .B4 Big Kandiyohi Lake .B413 Big Lake [Beltrami County] .B415 Big Lake [Saint Louis County] .B417 Big Lake [Stearns County] .B42 Big Marine Lake .B43 Big Sandy Lake [Aitkin County] .B44 Big Spunk Lake .B45 Big Stone Lake [MN & SD] .B46 Big Stone Lake State Park .B49 Big Trout Lake .B53 Birch Coulee Battlefield State Historic Site .B533 Birch Coulee Creek .B54 Birch Lake [Cass County : Hiram & Birch Lake townships] .B55 Birch Lake [Lake County] .B56 Black Duck Lake .B57 Blackduck Lake [Beltrami County] .B58 Blue Mounds State Park .B584 Blueberry Lake [Becker County] .B585 Blueberry Lake [Wadena County] .B598 Boulder Lake Reservoir .B6 Boundary Waters Canoe Area .B62 Bowstring Lake [Itasca County] .B63 Boy Lake [Cass County] .B68 Bronson, Lake 1307 G4142 MINNESOTA.
    [Show full text]