DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress Prepared in cooperation with the Northeast Texas Municipal Water District and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous, Big Cypress Basin, Northeastern Texas, 2010–11 Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: Top right, Cypress knees, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Top left, Electrofishing from a barge, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by Erin C. Sewell, U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom right, Electrofishing from a boat, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by Justin A. McInnis, U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom left, Measuring physical characteristics, Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 26, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover, Cypress tree near Big Cypress Creek, Texas, July 27, 2011. Photograph taken by James B. Moring, U.S. Geological Survey. Baseline Assessment of Physical Characteristics, Aquatic Biota, and Selected Water-Quality Properties at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous, Big Cypress Basin, Northeastern Texas, 2010–11 By Christopher L. Braun and James B. Moring Prepared in cooperation with the Northeast Texas Municipal Water District and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Braun, C.L., and Moring, J.B., 2013, Baseline assessment of physical characteristics, aquatic biota, and selected water-quality properties at the reach and mesohabitat scale for reaches of Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous, Big Cypress Basin, northeastern Texas, 2010–11: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5058, 90 p. iii Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................4 Description of Study Area ..................................................................................................................4 Previous Studies and Background Information ..............................................................................6 Methods .........................................................................................................................................................9 Site Selection and Environmental Flow Prescriptions ..................................................................9 Physical Characteristics ...................................................................................................................11 Aquatic Biota Collection ...................................................................................................................16 Fish Surveys ...............................................................................................................................16 Mussel Surveys .........................................................................................................................16 Selected Water-Quality Properties .................................................................................................17 Quality Assurance ..............................................................................................................................18 Physical Characteristics and Aquatic Biota at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Reaches on Big Cypress, Black Cypress, and Little Cypress Bayous During Summer 2010 ..................................................................................................................................18 Physical Characteristics ...................................................................................................................18 Fish Surveys ........................................................................................................................................20 Mussel Surveys in Big Cypress Bayou and Black Cypress Bayou ............................................25 Physical Characteristics and Aquatic Biota at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale for Big Cypress Bayou During Summer 2010 and Summer 2011 ........................................................32 Physical Characteristics ...................................................................................................................32 Fish Surveys ........................................................................................................................................32 Physical Characteristics and Water-Quality Properties in the Absence of Flow in Isolated Pools at the Reach and Mesohabitat Scale on Black Cypress and Little Cypress Bayous During Fall 2011 ................................................................................................34 Summary .......................................................................................................................................................37 References ...................................................................................................................................................38 Appendixes 1. Physical Habitat Measurements .............................................................................................41 2. Water-Quality Properties Measured in Samples Collected from Isolated Pools along Discrete Transect Lines .................................................................................................59 3. Number of Fish, Relative Abundance, and Catch Per Unit Effort ......................................65 4. Mussel Data and Habitat Descriptions ..................................................................................77 Figures 1. Map showing location of study area, Big Cypress Basin, northeastern Texas ................3 2. Map showing study reach locations and U.S. Geological Survey streamflow- gaging station locations, Big Cypress Basin, northeastern Texas ......................................5 3. Graph showing daily mean discharge at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow- gaging station 07346000 Big Cypress Bayou near Jefferson, Texas, August 1, 1924–December 31, 2011 ............................................................................................................6 iv 4. Graphs showing daily mean discharge during October 1, 1979–December 31, 2011, at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations A, 07346000 Big Cypress Bayou near Jefferson, Texas, B, 07346045 Black Cypress Bayou at Jefferson, Tex., C, 07346070 Little Cypress Bayou near Jefferson, Tex., and D, measured daily mean discharge from stations 07346000, 07346045, and 07346070 ......................................7 5. Graphs showing daily mean discharge at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow- gaging stations A, 07346000 Big Cypress Bayou near Jefferson, Texas, B, 07346045 Black Cypress Bayou at Jefferson, Tex., C, 07346070 Little Cypress Bayou near Jefferson, Tex., and D, composite depiction of measured daily mean discharge from stations 07346000, 07346045, and 07346070, January 1, 2009–December 31, 2011 ............................................................................................................8 6. Map showing mesohabitat extents and channel features surveyed A, July 2010, and B, July 2011, at U.S. Geological Survey station 07346015 Big Cypress Bayou at confluence of French Creek, Jefferson, Texas ................................................................13 7. Map showing mesohabitat extents and channel features surveyed A, August 2010, and B, October 2011, at U.S. Geological Survey station 07346044 Black Cypress Bayou near U.S. Highway 59 near Jefferson, Texas ............................................14 8. Map showing mesohabitat extents and channel features surveyed A, August 2010, and B, October 2011, at U.S. Geological Survey station 07346071 Little Cypress Bayou near U.S. Highway 59 near Jefferson, Texas ............................................15 9. Graphs showing physical parameters in different mesohabitats collected in 2010 from U.S. Geological Survey stations 07346015 Big Cypress Bayou at confluence of French Creek, Jefferson, Texas, 07346044 Black Cypress Bayou near U.S. Highway 59 near
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest Lake Cypress Springs Fisheries Survey Report
    PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by FEDERAL AID IN SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACT TEXAS FEDERAL AID PROJECT F-221-M-5 INLAND FISHERIES DIVISION MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 Survey Report Lake Cypress Springs Prepared by: Lynn D. Wright, Assistant District Management Supervisor and Timothy J. Bister, District Management Supervisor Inland Fisheries Division Marshal District Marshall, Texas Carter Smith Executive Director Craig Bonds Director, Inland Fisheries July 31, 2015 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Survey and Management Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2 Reservoir Description .................................................................................................................................... 2 Angler Access ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Management History ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 --~ Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 657 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y C I R C U L A R 657 Washington 1972 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretory Geological Survey W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1970 Part 7.-Lower Mississippi River Basin INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Lower Mississippi River basin for which recorc's have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods through September 30, 1970, It supersedes Geological Survey Circular 577, It was updated by personnel of the Data Reports Unit, Water Resources Divisior. Geo­ logical Survey. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consif'ting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divid~d into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published inl4volumes,oneforeachof the parts, From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were published annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6, Beginning in 1961, theannualseriesofwater-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year series, and records for the period 1961-65 were published in 37 volumes, there being 2 or more volumes for each of 11 parts and one each for parts 10, 13, 14, 15 (Alaska), and 16 (Hawaii and other Pacific areas).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report
    2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following for their contribution to the 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report: Lucas Gregory, PhD Texas A&M Agrilife, Texas Water Resources Institute Lake O’ the Pines National Water Quality Initiative Phase I Update . Laura-Ashley Overdyke Executive Director, Caddo Lake Institute 2018 Updates on the Paddlefish Project: Caddo Lake Institute . Tim Bister Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Invasive Species Control Activities in 2017 . Adam Whisenant and Greg Conley Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Dewatering Below Lake O’ the Pines Ferrell's Bridge Dam PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY The preparation of this report was financed through funding from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. i 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • \ X ./ J DOCUMENTS Rn,[1
    \ X./J -. 4 , , ~ - .~4 ~ ,TEXASS DOCUMENTS rn,[1 texas & news TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT " AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 In the March 1, 1989 issue: . - - - 1 Cold Weather Killed 7.5 million Coastal Fish . - - - 2 Three Waterfowl Habitat Projects Completed . - . - - - 4 Crappie Population Strong At Cypress Springs . - . - 5 Volksmarch Walk-A-Thon Set At Guadalupe Park . .. .... ... 5 Boater Education Classes Offered In Houston . 6 . - . - - - - Big Gag Is No Joke To Charter Boat Captain . 7 . - . - - -H.- R. Magee's Bass Finally Bumped From Top 50 10 Top 50 Bass List . - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLD WEATHER KILLED 7.5 MILLION COASTAL FISH was fatal to AUSTIN -- The recent frigid weather on the Texas Gulf Coast differences between the approximately 7.5 million fish. There were many Texas Parks and recent cold weather and the record-setting 1983 freeze, the Wildlife Department said. Dr. Jerry Clark, chief of the department's Coastal Fisheries Branch, the 1983 said the February norther affected a relatively smaller area than freeze, but losses of sport and forage fish were high in East Matagorda Bay and in St. Charles Bay of the Aransas Bay system. optimistic "During and for a week after the cold temperatures, we were adverse that few fish were killed," Clark said. "However, because of weather conditions, department planes were grounded and no aerial assessments could be made." Once observers got airborne, he said, they discovered that some bays were hard hit. more than Of the estimated 7.5 million fish killed in the recent freeze,
    [Show full text]
  • Codes for the Identification of Hydrologic Units in the United States and the Caribbean Outlying Areas Date of Approval: July 1981 Maintenance Organization: U.S
    A U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATA STANDARD This report describes one of a series of data standards adopted and im¬ plemented by the U.S. Geological Survey for the standardization of data elements and representations used in automated Earth-science systems. Earth sciences are those scientific disciplines especially required to carry out the mission of the Geological Survey and are concerned with the material and morphology of the Earth and physical forces relating to the Earth. These disciplines include geology, topography, geography, and hydrology. The Geological Survey has assumed the leadership in developing and main¬ taining Earth-science data element and representation standards for use in the Federal establishment under the terms of a Memorandum of Understand¬ ing signed in February 1980 by the National Bureau of Standards of the Department of Commerce and the Geological Survey, a Bureau of the Depart¬ ment of the Interior. As such, in addition to developing and maintaining standards, the Geological Survey reviews and processes all requests referred by the National Bureau of Standards for exceptions, deferments, and revi¬ sion of standards applicable to Federal Earth-science information systems; assists the National Bureau of Standards in assessing the need, impact, benefits, and problems related to the implementation of standards being con¬ sidered for development, or developed, for use in the Earth sciences; and works with other agencies in developing new data standards in the Earth sciences. The standard described in this report has been specifically approved for use within the U.S. Geological Survey. If the standard has been approved for use throughout the Federal establishment, it is also published by the National Bureau of Standards as a Federal Information Processing Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Lake Annotated Bibliography March 2005
    CADDO LAKE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY MARCH 2005 Texas A&M University Team Kirk Winemiller, Daniel Roelke, Anne Chin, Stephen Davis, Bradford Wilcox, Luz Romero This document contains a bibliographic review of Caddo Lake, located in the Cypress Creek Basin. This annotated bibliography has been divided into eight sections as follows: 1) Caddo Lake Historical Background 1-5 2) Hydrology and Geomorphology (introduction) 5 Groundwater Hydrology 5-7 Sedimentation and Contaminants 7-8 Geotechnical and Geomorphic Investigations 8 Surface Hydrology 8-11 3) Water Quality 12-22 4) Aquatic Ecology (introduction) 22- Fish Community 22-34 Invertebrate Community 34-36 5) Wetland Vegetation 36-45 6) Other Fauna 45-47 7) Relevant Information to Caddo Lake System 47-51 8) Maps 51-52 CADDO LAKE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: The documents below provide information of different aspects of the Caddo Lake history such as hydrologic changes, formation of Caddo Lake, vegetation, and navigation. Dahmer, F. 1995. Caddo Was… A Short History of Caddo Lake. University of texas Press. This book narrates the natural history of Caddo Lake. The initial name recorded in 1840, was Sodo Lake. This name came from the Indian name Tso’to, which was a body of water twenty miles long and eight miles wide. Sodo or Soda Lake was roughly between present day Mooringsport and Shreveport, Louisiana. 1 This Lake was a result of the Red River overflow into what it is now called Caddo Lake. The same overflow of the Red River caused the Big, Little, and Black Cypress Rivers to back up, and the lake formed what was called Fairy Lake (Caddo Lake).
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was improvements to include levees, headwater reservoirs, created by an act of Congress on June 28, 1879. The and pumping stations that maximize the benefits Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the realized on the main stem by expanding flood Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries protection coverage and improving drainage into (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three adjacent areas within the alluvial valley. officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Since its initiation, the MR&T project has brought Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three an unprecedented degree of flood protection to the civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All approximate 4 million people living in the members are appointed by the President with the advice 35,000-square-mile project area within the lower and consent of the Senate. Mississippi Valley. The Nation has contributed more than $13 billion toward the planning, construction, The MRC has a proud heritage that dates back to operation, and maintenance of the project. To date, the June 28, 1879. Congress established the seven-member Nation has received a 27 to 1 return on that investment, presidential Commission with the mission to transform including $360 billion in flood damages prevented. the Mississippi River into a reliable commercial artery, while protecting adjacent towns and fertile agricultural The MRC continued its 130-year process of lands from destructive floods. The 1879 legislation that listening to the concerns of partners and stakeholders in created MRC granted the body extensive planning the Mississippi valley, inspecting the challenges posed authority and jurisdiction on the Mississippi River by the river, and partnering to find sustainable stretching from its headwaters at Lake Itasca to the engineering solutions to those challenges through the Head of Passes, near its mouth at the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units
    Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units Region 01 New England Region -- The drainage within the United States that ultimately discharges into: (a) the Bay of Fundy; (b) the Atlantic Ocean within and between the states of Maine and Connecticut; (c) Long Island Sound north of the New York-Connecticut state line; and (d) the Riviere St. Francois, a tributary of the St. Lawrence River. Includes all of Maine, New Hampshire and Rhode Island and parts of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont. Subregion 0101 -- St. John: The St. John River Basin within the United States. Maine. Area = 7330 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010100 -- St. John. Maine. Area = 7330 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01010001 -- Upper St. John. Maine. Area = 2120 sq.mi. 01010002 -- Allagash. Maine. Area = 1250 sq.mi. 01010003 -- Fish. Maine. Area = 908 sq.mi. 01010004 -- Aroostook. Maine. Area = 2420 sq.mi. 01010005 -- Meduxnekeag. Maine. Area = 634 sq.mi. Subregion 0102 -- Penobscot: The Penobscot River Basin. Maine. Area = 8610 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010200 -- Penobscot. Maine. Area = 8610 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01020001 -- West Branch Penobscot. Maine. Area = 2150 sq.mi. 01020002 -- East Branch Penobscot. Maine. Area = 1130 sq.mi. 01020003 -- Mattawamkeag. Maine. Area = 1510 sq.mi. 01020004 -- Piscataquis. Maine. Area = 1460 sq.mi. 01020005 -- Lower Penobscot. Maine. Area = 2360 sq.mi. Subregion 0103 -- Kennebec: The Kennebec River Basin, including part of Merrymeeting Bay. Maine. Area = 5900 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010300 -- Kennebec. Maine. Area = 5900 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01030001 -- Upper Kennebec. Maine. Area = 1570 sq.mi. 01030002 -- Dead. Maine. Area = 878 sq.mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Problem Identification
    CHAPTER 3 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION &KDSWHU#6 3UREOHP#,GHQWLILFDWLRQ 7KLV chapter identifies the area of investigation’s problems and needs and presents environmental restoration, source water protection and water quality improvements, historic restoration, flood damage reduction, erosion protection, recreation, economic development, lake operation, and water supply opportunities. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION The various habitat cover types within the Cypress Valley Watershed are discussed in the Cypress Valley Resource Inventory and depicted in the vegetation/land cover map that was generated using satellite imagery, ground-truthing, and Geographic Information System technology. The land cover map is shown on Figure 3-1. FOREST RESTORATION The Cypress Valley Watershed is located within the Pineywoods vegetational area of Texas and was historically dominated by forested land. Currently, mixed pine-hardwood forest is the predominant forested cover type in the watershed. These forests occur on uplands and are dominated by loblolly pine mixed with water oak, willow oak, red oak, post oak, sweetgum, maple, elm and sugarberry. Bottomland hardwood forests occur along drainages, floodplains, and at lower elevations where they are generally inundated or saturated with surface or groundwater periodically during the growing season. (Bottomland hardwoods can also be classified as wetlands, depending on hydrology, soil type, and vegetation composition). Bottomland hardwoods is the second most common forest type within the Cypress Valley Watershed. The predominant bottomland hardwood forest types that occur within the study area are the water oak/willow oak association and the elm/sugarberry association. Because of their natural resource values and threat of conversion to other land cover types, bottomland hardwoods are the focus of forest restoration recommendations in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury in Big Cypress Bayou and Caddo Lake Watersheds in Marion and Harrison Counties Texas
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 12-15-2018 MERCURY IN BIG CYPRESS BAYOU AND CADDO LAKE WATERSHEDS IN MARION AND HARRISON COUNTIES TEXAS Joseph Watkins [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Geochemistry Commons, and the Geology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Watkins, Joseph, "MERCURY IN BIG CYPRESS BAYOU AND CADDO LAKE WATERSHEDS IN MARION AND HARRISON COUNTIES TEXAS" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 221. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/221 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MERCURY IN BIG CYPRESS BAYOU AND CADDO LAKE WATERSHEDS IN MARION AND HARRISON COUNTIES TEXAS Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This thesis is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/221 MERCURY IN BIG CYPRESS BAYOU AND CADDO LAKE WATERSHEDS IN MARION AND HARRISON COUNTIES TEXAS BY JOSEPH DANIEL WATKINS, Bachelor of Science Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Stephen F. Austin State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Stephen F. Austin State University December 2018 MERCURY IN BIG CYPRESS BAYOU AND CADDO LAKE WATERSHEDS IN MARION AND HARRISON COUNTIES, TEXAS BY JOSEPH DANIEL WATKINS, Bachelor of Science APPROVED: _______________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Historical Investigations at 41TT310, Lake Bob Sandlin State Park, Titus County, Texas
    Volume 1984 Article 30 1984 Archeological and Historical Investigations at 41TT310, Lake Bob Sandlin State Park, Titus County, Texas Daniel J. Prikryl Kathleen Gilmore Ross C. Fields Nancy Reese Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Prikryl, Daniel J.; Gilmore, Kathleen; Fields, Ross C.; and Reese, Nancy (1984) "Archeological and Historical Investigations at 41TT310, Lake Bob Sandlin State Park, Titus County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1984, Article 30. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1984/iss1/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological and Historical Investigations at 41TT310, Lake Bob Sandlin State Park, Titus County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1984/iss1/30 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT 41TT310, LAKE BOB SANDLIN STATE PARK, TITUS COUNTY, TEXAS by Daniel J.
    [Show full text]