Gnetum Spp.) in the SOUTHWEST and LITTORAL REGIONS, CAMEROON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gnetum Spp.) in the SOUTHWEST and LITTORAL REGIONS, CAMEROON SWeethoney GCP/RAF/408/EC « MOBILISATION ET RENFORCEMENT DES CAPACITES DES PETITES ET MOYENNES ENTREPRISES IMPLIQUEES DANS LES FILIERES DES PRODUITS FORESTIERS NON LIGNEUX EN AFRIQUE CENTRALE » ERU MARKET CHAIN BASELINE (Gnetum spp.) in the SOUTHWEST and LITTORAL REGIONS, CAMEROON Louis NDUMBE 1, Verina INGRAM2and Abdon AWONO3 1 - MSc Student, University of Buea 2 - Scientist and 3 - Researcher, CIFOR Yaoundé, November 2009 with the financial support of the European Commission The opinions expressed in this document can not be considered as a reflection of the position of the European Commission. The results opinions, advice are the sole responsibility of the contributors. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the publication, the authors cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF PHOTOS ................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................. VII EXCHANGE RATES .......................................................................................................................... VII SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 RESUME ................................................................................................................................................ 2 PART I - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT .................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................................ 6 1.5 STUDY LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 GNETUM SPECIES............................................................................................................................10 2.3 NUTRITIONAL AND MEDICINAL VALUE ...........................................................................................11 2.4 PROTECTED AREAS ........................................................................................................................12 2.5 POPULATION ..................................................................................................................................12 2.6 DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS ...........................................................................................................13 2.7 BUSINESS INDICATORS ...................................................................................................................14 2.8 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................14 2.9 TEMPERATURE ...............................................................................................................................14 2.10 RELIEF...........................................................................................................................................15 2.11 DRAINAGE......................................................................................................................................15 2.12 VEGETATION .................................................................................................................................16 2.13 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ......................................................................................................................17 2.14 AGRICULTURE ................................................................................................................................17 3 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 18 3.1 SAMPLING METHODS......................................................................................................................18 3.1.1 Site Selection ............................................................................................................ 18 3.1.2 Selection of Respondents .......................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Questionnaire Design ................................................................................................ 19 3.2 DATA COLLECTION ...........................................................................................................................21 3.2.1 Preparation ............................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Secondary data collection ......................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Field work ................................................................................................................ 21 3.2.4 Rapid assessment ...................................................................................................... 21 3.2.5 Observation .............................................................................................................. 21 3.2.6 Interviews ................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.7 Analytical procedure ............................................................................................ 22 3.2.8 Data analysis tools ............................................................................................... 22 3.3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................22 3.3.1 Value chain analysis ................................................................................................. 23 3.3.2 Sustainable livelihoods ............................................................................................. 23 CIFOR Market chain baseline Gnetum spp. Southwest region, Cameroon i 4 DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS ...................................................................................................... 25 4.1 MARKET.........................................................................................................................................25 4.2 MARKETING ...................................................................................................................................25 4.3 PROCESSING ...................................................................................................................................25 4.4 MARKET CHAIN .............................................................................................................................25 4.5 POVERTY........................................................................................................................................26 4.6 LIVELIHOODS .................................................................................................................................26 4.7 GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................................26 4.8 SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................................................27 4.9 VALUATION ...................................................................................................................................28 5 GNETUM TRADE IN CAMEROON ............................................................................................ 30 5.1 PRODUCTION AREAS AND QUANTITIES ............................................................................................30 5.1.1 Domestication ........................................................................................................... 30 5.2 ACTORS..........................................................................................................................................31 5.2.1 Gnetum market organisation ..................................................................................... 31 5.2.2 Market channels........................................................................................................ 32 5.2.3 Volume
Recommended publications
  • Reproductive Strategy of Chrysichthys Nigrodigitatus (Lacepede, 1803) in a Natural Environment in the Nkam River, Littoral Cameroon
    Hindawi International Journal of Zoology Volume 2020, Article ID 1378086, 8 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1378086 Research Article Reproductive Strategy of Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus (Lacepede, 1803) in a Natural Environment in the Nkam River, Littoral Cameroon Claudine Tekounegning Tiogue´ ,1 Boddis Tsiguia Zebaze,2 Paul Zango,3 and Minette Eyango Tomedi-Tabi3 1Laboratory of Applied Ichthyology and Hydrobiology (LAIH), School of Wood, Water and Natural Resources (SWWNR), Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FAAS), !e University of Dschang, P.O. Box 786, Ebolowa Antenna, Dschang, Cameroon 2Laboratory of Applied Ichthyology and Hydrobiology (LAIH), Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FAAS), !e University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon 3Laboratory for Aquaculture and Demography of Fisheries Resources (LADFR), Departement of Aquaculture, Institute of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences of Yabassi (IFAS), !e University of Douala, P.O. Box 2701, Douala, Cameroon Correspondence should be addressed to Claudine Tekounegning Tiogue´; [email protected] Received 30 July 2019; Accepted 20 December 2019; Published 15 February 2020 Academic Editor: Cucco Copyright © 2020 Claudine Tekounegning Tiogue´ et al. (is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A study on the reproductive strategy of Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus was conducted from October 2015 to August 2016, in the Nkam River in Yabassi, Littoral Region of Cameroon. For this purpose, 154 specimens of C. nigrodigitatus with total mean weight of 829.96 ± 829.58 g and total mean length of 367 ± 156 mm collected from artisanal fishermen were used.
    [Show full text]
  • MINMAP Région Du Centre SERVICES DECONCENTRES REGIONAUX ET DEPARTEMENTAUX
    MINMAP Région du Centre SERVICES DECONCENTRES REGIONAUX ET DEPARTEMENTAUX N° Désignation des MO/MOD Nbre de Marchés Montant des Marchés N° page 1 Services déconcentrés Régionaux 19 2 278 252 000 4 Département de la Haute Sanaga 2 Services déconcentrés départementaux 6 291 434 000 7 3 COMMUNE DE BIBEY 2 77 000 000 8 4 COMMUNE DE LEMBE YEZOUM 8 119 000 000 8 5 COMMUNE DE MBANDJOCK 3 50 000 000 10 6 COMMUNE DE MINTA 5 152 500 000 10 7 COMMUNE DE NANGA-EBOKO 12 139 500 000 11 8 COMMUNE DE NKOTENG 5 76 000 000 13 9 COMMUNE DE NSEM 1 27 000 000 13 TOTAL 42 932 434 000 Département de la Lekié 10 Services déconcentrés départementaux 8 268 357 000 14 11 COMMUNE DE BATCHENGA 2 35 000 000 15 12 COMMUNE DE LOBO 8 247 000 000 15 13 COMMUNE DE MONATELE 11 171 500 000 16 14 COMMUNE DE SA'A 16 384 357 000 18 15 COMMUNE D'ELIG-MFOMO 7 125 000 000 20 16 COMMUNE D'EVODOULA 9 166 250 000 21 17 COMMUNE D'OBALA 14 223 500 000 22 18 COMMUNE D'OKOLA 22 752 956 000 24 19 COMMUNE D’EBEBDA 6 93 000 000 27 TOTAL 103 2 466 920 000 Département du Mbam et Inoubou 20 Services déconcentrés départementaux 4 86 000 000 28 21 COMMUNE DE BAFIA 5 75 500 000 28 22 COMMUNE DE BOKITO 12 213 000 000 29 23 COMMUNE DE KIIKI 4 134 000 000 31 24 COMMUNE DE KONYAMBETA 6 155 000 000 32 25 COMMUNE DE DEUK 2 77 000 000 33 26 COMMUNE DE MAKENENE 3 17 000 000 33 27 COMMUNE DE NDIKINIMEKI 4 84 000 000 34 28 COMMUNE D'OMBESSA 5 91 000 000 34 29 COMMUNE DE NITOUKOU 6 83 000 000 35 TOTAL 51 1 015 500 000 MINMAP/DIVISION DE LA PROGRAMMATION ET DU SUIVI DES MARCHES PUBLICS Page 1 de 88 N° Désignation
    [Show full text]
  • GRASSES, Its Center
    CALAMAGROSTIS zones 5-9 x acutiflora ‘Avalanche’ wheat; flowers ESU 36”-60” in seed, 12-24”W Feather reed Grass. A variegated, brighter form of ‘Karl Forester'. Foliage has a wide white stripe down GRASSES, its center. Creamy white seed heads turn to a golden straw in fall. Reportedly does well in heavy clay soils, GROUNDCOVERS, unlike many other ornamental grasses. $9.99 2.75 Qt./2.6 l. AND VINES PRICE GUIDE 2017 ORNAMENTAL GRASS ...... 1 GROUNDCOVERS ............ 7 VINES ....................... 16 Prices and pot sizes are a. ‘Karl Foerster’ wheat; flowers ESU 36”-60” in seed, 18-24”W subject to change. Feather Reed Grass. A sterile hybrid, with upright, tight habit. Tawny, wheat-colored feathery plumes appear early in the summer and last all season. ORNAMENTAL Introduced in 1939; brought to the USA in 1964. ‘Perennial Plant of the Year’ for 2001. Looks great GRASSES with echinacea and eryngium. Zones 4-8 ARRHENATHERUM zones 4-9 $7.99 2Qt./1.89 l., $13.99 #1 container elatius var. bulbosum ‘Variegatum’ CAREX zones 5-9 clump; flowers MSU 12-18”H x 18”W Bulbous Oat Grass. Loosely tufted plant with semi- (Sedge) erect, narrow, gray-green leaves with white edges. Silvery-green panicles with oat-like spikelets. $7.99 2Qt./1.89 l. BOUTELOUA zones 3-10 gracilis clump; flowers LSP-MSU 24” x 18-24”W Side Oats Grass, Blue Grama, Mosquito Grass. This native prairie grass has narrow green blades and unique flower spikes which are attached at right angles to the stems and resemble mosquito larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionnaire Des Villages Du Fako : Village Dictionary of Fako Division
    OFFICE DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIOUE ET TECHNIOUE OUTRE· MER Il REPUBLIQUE UNIE DU CAMEROUN DICTIONNAIRE DES VILLAGES DU FAKO VILLAGE DICTIONARY OF FAKO DIVISION SECTION DE GEOGRAPHIE 1 OFFICE DE LA RECHERCHE SCIm~TIFIQUE REPUBLIQUE UNIE ET TECmUQUE OUTRE-lViER DU CAlvŒROUN UNITED REPUBLIC OF CANEROON CENTRE O.R.S.T.O.N DE YAOUNDE DICTIONNAIRE DES VILLAGES DU FAKO VILLAGE DICTIONARY OF FAKO DIVISION Juillet 1973 July 1973 COPYRIGHT O.R.S.T.O.M 1973 TABLE DES NATIERES CONTENTS i l j l ! :i i ~ Présentation •••••.•.•.....••....•.....•....••••••.••.••••••.. 1 j Introduction ........................................•• 3 '! ) Signification des principaux termes utilisés •.............• 5 î l\lIeaning of the main words used Tableau de la population du département •...••.....•..•.•••• 8 Population of Fako division Département du Fako : éléments de démographie •.•.... ..••.•• 9 Fako division: demographic materials Arrondissements de Muyuka et de Tiko : éléments de . démographie 0 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 10 11uyul{a and Tileo sl)..bdivisions:demographic materials Arrondissement de Victoria: éléments de démographie •••.••• 11 Victoria subdivision:demographic materials Les plantations (12/1972) •••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••• 12 Plantations (12/1972) Liste des villages par arrondissement, commune et graupement 14 List of villages by subdivision, area council and customary court Signification du code chiffré •..•••...•.•...•.......•.•••.• 18 Neaning of the code number Liste alphabétique des villages ••••••.••••••••.•.•..•••.•.• 19
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter Cluster Dashboard NWSW052021
    Shelter Cluster NW/SW Cameroon Key Figures Individuals Partners Subdivisions Cameroon 03 23,143 assisted 05 Individual Reached Trend Nigeria Furu Awa Ako Misaje Fungom DONGA MANTUNG MENCHUM Nkambe Bum NORD-OUEST Menchum Nwa Valley Wum Ndu Fundong Noni 11% BOYO Nkum Bafut Njinikom Oku Kumbo Belo BUI Mbven of yearly Target Njikwa Akwaya Jakiri MEZAM Babessi Tubah Reached MOMO Mbeggwi Ngie Bamenda 2 Bamenda 3 Ndop Widikum Bamenda 1 Menka NGO KETUNJIA Bali Balikumbat MANYU Santa Batibo Wabane Eyumodjock Upper Bayang LEBIALEM Mamfé Alou OUEST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Fontem Nguti KOUPÉ HNO/HRP 2021 (NW/SW Regions) Toko MANENGOUBA Bangem Mundemba SUD-OUEST NDIAN Konye Tombel 1,351,318 Isangele Dikome value Kumba 2 Ekondo Titi Kombo Kombo PEOPLE OF CONCERN Abedimo Etindi MEME Number of PoC Reached per Subdivision Idabato Kumba 1 Bamuso 1 - 100 Kumba 3 101 - 2,000 LITTORAL 2,001 - 13,000 785,091 Mbongé Muyuka PEOPLE IN NEED West Coast Buéa FAKO Tiko Limbé 2 Limbé 1 221,642 Limbé 3 [ Kilometers PEOPLE TARGETED 0 15 30 *Note : Sources: HNO 2021 PiN includes IDP, Returnees and Host Communi�es The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Key Achievement Indicators PoC Reached - AGD Breakdouwn 296 # of Households assisted with Children 27% 26% emergency shelter 1,480 Adults 21% 22% # of households assisted with core 3,769 Elderly 2% 2% relief items including prevention of COVID-19 21,618 female male 41 # of households assisted with cash for rental subsidies 41 Households Reached Individuals Reached Cartegories of beneficiaries reported People Reached by region Distribution of Shelter NFI kits integrated with COVID 19 KITS in Matoh town.
    [Show full text]
  • MINMAP South-West Region
    MINMAP South-West region SUMMARY OF DATA BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED Number of N° Designation of PO/DPO Amount of Contracts N° Page contracts 1 Limbe City Council 7 475 000 000 4 2 Kumba City Council 1 10 000 000 5 3 External Services 14 440 032 000 6 Fako Division 4 External Services 9 179 015 000 8 5 Buea Council 5 125 500 000 9 6 Idenau Council 4 124 000 000 10 7 Limbe I Council 4 152 000 000 10 8 Limbe II Council 4 219 000 000 11 9 Limbe III Council 6 102 500 000 12 10 Muyuka Council 6 127 000 000 13 11 Tiko Council 5 159 000 000 14 TOTAL 43 1 188 015 000 Kupe Muanenguba Division 12 External Services 5 100 036 000 15 13 Bangem Council 9 605 000 000 15 14 Nguti Council 6 104 000 000 17 15 Tombel Council 7 131 000 000 18 TOTAL 27 940 036 000 MINMAP / PUBLIC CONTRACTS PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING DIVISION Page 1 of 34 MINMAP South-West region SUMMARY OF DATA BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED Lebialem Division 16 External Services 5 134 567 000 19 17 Alou Council 9 144 000 000 19 18 Menji Council 3 181 000 000 20 19 Wabane Council 9 168 611 000 21 TOTAL 26 628 178 000 Manyu Division 18 External Services 5 98 141 000 22 19 Akwaya Council 6 119 500 000 22 20 Eyomojock Council 6 119 000 000 23 21 Mamfe Council 5 232 000 000 24 22 Tinto Council 6 108 000 000 25 TOTAL 28 676 641 000 Meme Division 22 External Services 5 85 600 000 26 23 Mbonge Council 7 149 000 000 26 24 Konye Council 1 27 000 000 27 25 Kumba I Council 3 65 000 000 27 26 Kumba II Council 5 83 000 000 28 27 Kumba III Council 3 84 000 000 28 TOTAL 24 493 600 000 MINMAP / PUBLIC CONTRACTS
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionnaire Des Villages Du Mbam P
    OFFICE DE LA RECHERCHE REPUBliQUE FEDERALE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DU OUT,RE·MER CAMEROUN CENTRE OR5TOM DE YAOUNDE DICTIONNAIRE DES _VILLAGES DU MBAM D'après la documentation réunie par ~la Section de Géographie de l'I.R.CAM.3 REPERTQIRE GEOGRAPHIQUE DU CAMEROUN FASCICULE n° 1 1 rR-GAM 8. P. '9J SH. n° 31 ­ YAOUNDÉ Mai 1966 REPERTOIRE GEOGRAPHIQUE DU CAMEROUN Fasc. Tableau de la population du Cameroun, 68 p. Fév. 1965 SH, N° 17 Fasc. 2 Dictionnaire des villages du Dia et Lobo, 89 p. Juin 1965 SH. N° 22 Fasc. 3 Dictionnaire des villages de la Haute-Sanaga, 53 p. Août 1965 SH. N° 23 Fasc. 4 Dictionnaire des villages du Nyong et Mfoumou, 49 p. Octobre 1965 SH. N° 24 Fasc. 5 Dictionnaire des villages du Nyong et Soo 45 p. Novembre 1965 SH. N° 25 Fasc. 6 Dictionnaire des villages du Ntem 126 p. Décembre 1965 SH. N° 26 Fasc. 7 Dictionnaire- des villages de la Mefou 108 p. Janvier 1966 SH. N° 27 Fasc. 8 Dictionnaire des villages du Nyong et Kellé 51 p. Février 1966 SH. N° 28 Fasc. 9 Dictionnaire des villages de la Lékié 71 p. Mars 1966 SH. N° 29 Fasc. 10 Dictionnaire des villages de Kribi P. Mars 1966 SH. N° 30 Fasc. 11 Dictionnaire des villages du Mbam P. 60 Mai 1966 SH. N° 31 Fasc. 12 Dictionnaire des villages de Boumba Ngoko (en préparation) Fasc. 13 ùictionnaire des villages de Lom-et-Diérem (en préparation! omCE DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE RERJBLlQUE FEDERALE ET TECHNI~E OUmE-MER ID CAMEROUN _ • _cee- -- - CENTRE ORSTOM DE YAOUNDE DICTIONNAIRE ~ VILLAGES DU ...........M B A M MAI 1!66 S.R.
    [Show full text]
  • MINMAP South-West Region
    MINMAP South-West region SUMMARY OF DATA BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED Number of N° Designation of PO/DPO Amount of Contracts N° Page contracts 1 Regional External Services 9 490 982 000 3 Fako Division 2 Départemental External Services of the Division 17 352 391 000 4 3 Buea Council 11 204 778 000 6 4 Idenau Council 10 224 778 000 7 5 Limbe I Council 12 303 778 000 8 6 Limbe II Council 13 299 279 000 9 7 Limbe III Council 6 151 900 000 10 8 Muyuka Council 16 250 778 000 11 9 Tiko Council 14 450 375 748 12 TOTAL 99 2 238 057 748 Kupe Muanenguba Division 10 Départemental External Services of the Division 6 135 764 000 13 11 Bangem Council 11 572 278 000 14 12 Nguti Council 9 215 278 000 15 13 Tombel Council 6 198 278 000 16 TOTAL 32 1 121 598 000 Lebialem Division 14 Départemental External Services of the Division 6 167 474 000 17 15 Alou Council 20 278 778 000 18 16 Menji Council 13 306 778 000 20 17 Wabane Council 12 268 928 000 21 TOTAL 51 1 021 958 000 PUBLIC CONTRACTS PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING DIVISION /MINMAP Page 1 of 36 MINMAP South-West region SUMMARY OF DATA BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED Number of N° Designation of PO/DPO Amount of Contracts N° Page contracts Manyu Division 18 Départemental External Services of the Division 9 240 324 000 22 19 Akwaya Council 10 260 278 000 23 20 Eyumojock Council 6 195 778 000 24 21 Mamfe Council 7 271 103 000 24 22 Tinto Council 7 219 778 000 25 TOTAL 39 1 187 261 000 Meme Division 23 Départemental External Services of the Division 4 82 000 000 26 24 Konye Council 5 171 533 000 26 25 Kumba
    [Show full text]
  • MINMAP Région Du Littoral
    MINMAP Région du Littoral SYNTHESE DES DONNEES SUR LA BASE DES INFORMATIONS RECUEILLIES Nbre de Montant des N° Désignation des MO/MOD N° Page Marchés Marchés 1 Communauté Urbaine d'Edéa 6 1 747 550 008 3 2 Services déconcentrés Régionaux 10 534 821 000 4 TOTAL 16 2 282 371 008 Département du Wouri 3 Services déconcentrés départementaux 6 246 700 000 5 4 Commune de Douala 1 9 370 778 000 5 5 Commune de Douala 2 9 752 778 000 6 6 Commune de Douala 3 12 273 778 000 8 7 Commune de Douala 4 10 278 778 000 9 8 Commune de Douala 5 10 204 605 268 10 9 Commune de Douala 6 10 243 778 000 11 TOTAL 66 2 371 195 268 Département du Moungo 10 Services déconcentrés départementaux 10 159 560 000 12 11 Commune de Bare Bakem 9 234 893 804 13 12 Commune de Bonalea 11 274 397 840 14 13 Commune de Dibombari 11 267 278 000 15 14 Commune de Loum 12 228 397 903 16 15 Commune de Manjo 8 160 940 286 18 16 Commune de Mbanga 10 228 455 858 19 17 Commune de Melong 17 291 778 000 20 18 Commune de Njombe Penja 17 427 728 000 21 19 Commune d'Ebone 10 190 778 000 23 20 Commune de Mombo 9 163 878 000 24 21 Commune de Nkongsamba I 7 161 000 000 25 22 Commune de Nkongsamba II 6 172 768 640 25 23 Commune de Nkongsamba III 9 195 278 000 26 TOTAL 146 3 157 132 331 Département de la Sanaga Maritime 24 Services déconcentrés départementaux 10 214 167 000 27 25 Commune de Dibamba 14 358 471 384 28 26 Commune de Dizangue 13 252 678 000 29 27 Commune de Massock 16 319 090 512 30 28 Commune de Mouanko 9 251 001 000 31 29 Commune de Ndom 17 340 778 000 31 30 Commune de Ngambe 9 235
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Garden Plants
    COLONIAL GARD~J~ PLANTS I Flowers Before 1700 The following plants are listed according to the names most commonly used during the colonial period. The botanical name follows for accurate identification. The common name was listed first because many of the people using these lists will have access to or be familiar with that name rather than the botanical name. The botanical names are according to Bailey’s Hortus Second and The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture (3, 4). They are not the botanical names used during the colonial period for many of them have changed drastically. We have been very cautious concerning the interpretation of names to see that accuracy is maintained. By using several references spanning almost two hundred years (1, 3, 32, 35) we were able to interpret accurately the names of certain plants. For example, in the earliest works (32, 35), Lark’s Heel is used for Larkspur, also Delphinium. Then in later works the name Larkspur appears with the former in parenthesis. Similarly, the name "Emanies" appears frequently in the earliest books. Finally, one of them (35) lists the name Anemones as a synonym. Some of the names are amusing: "Issop" for Hyssop, "Pum- pions" for Pumpkins, "Mushmillions" for Muskmellons, "Isquou- terquashes" for Squashes, "Cowslips" for Primroses, "Daffadown dillies" for Daffodils. Other names are confusing. Bachelors Button was the name used for Gomphrena globosa, not for Centaurea cyanis as we use it today. Similarly, in the earliest literature, "Marygold" was used for Calendula. Later we begin to see "Pot Marygold" and "Calen- dula" for Calendula, and "Marygold" is reserved for Marigolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmation De La Passation Et De L'exécution Des Marchés Publics
    PROGRAMMATION DE LA PASSATION ET DE L’EXÉCUTION DES MARCHÉS PUBLICS EXERCICE 2021 JOURNAUX DE PROGRAMMATION DES MARCHÉS DES SERVICES DÉCONCENTRÉS ET DES COLLECTIVITÉS TERRITORIALES DÉCENTRALISÉES RÉGION DU CENTRE EXERCICE 2021 SYNTHESE DES DONNEES SUR LA BASE DES INFORMATIONS RECUEILLIES N° Désignation des MO/MOD Nbre de Marchés Montant des Marchés N°Page 1 Services déconcentrés Régionaux 17 736 645 000 3 2 Communauté Urbaine de Yaoundé 62 10 459 000 000 5 Département de la Haute Sanaga 3 Services déconcentrés départementaux 2 24 000 000 10 4 Commune de Bibey 12 389 810 000 10 5 Commune de Lembe Yezoum 17 397 610 000 11 6 Commune de Mbandjock 12 214 000 000 12 7 Commune de Minta 8 184 500 000 12 8 Commune de Nanga Ebogo 21 372 860 000 13 9 Commune de Nkoteng 12 281 550 000 14 10 Commune de Nsem 5 158 050 000 15 TOTAL 89 2 022 380 000 Département de la Lekié 11 Services déconcentrés départementaux 9 427 000 000 16 12 Commune de Batchenga 8 194 000 000 17 13 Commune d'Ebebda 10 218 150 000 18 14 Commune d'Elig-Mfomo 8 174 000 000 19 15 Commune d'Evodoula 10 242 531 952 20 16 Commune de Lobo 11 512 809 000 21 17 Commune de Monatélé 12 288 500 000 22 18 commune d'Obala 11 147 000 000 23 19 commune d'Okola 14 363 657 000 24 20 commune de Sa'a 17 319 500 000 25 TOTAL 110 2 887 147 952 Département du Mbam et Inoubou 21 Services déconcentrés départementaux 6 144 385 000 27 22 Commune Bafia 13 213 500 000 27 23 Commune de Bokito 9 167 500 000 28 24 Commune de DEUK 17 379 500 000 29 25 Commune Kiiki 10 285 000 000 30 26 Commune Konyambeta 12 295
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Outbreak
    Emergency appeal final report Cameroon: Cholera outbreak Emergency appeal n° MDRCM011 GLIDE n° EP-2011-000034-CMR 31 October 2012 Period covered by this Final Report: 04 April 2011 to 30 June 2012 Appeal target (current): CHF 1,361,331. Appeal coverage: 21%; <click here to go directly to the final financial report, or here to view the contact details> Appeal history: This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 04 April 2011 for CHF 1,249,847 for 12 months to assist 87,500 beneficiaries. CHF 150,000 was initially allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the national society in responding by delivering assistance. Operations update No 1 was issued on 30 May 2011 to revise the objectives and budget of the operation. Operations update No 2 was issued on 31st May 2011 to provide financial statement against revised budget. Operations update No 3 was issued on 12 October 2011 to summarize the achievements 6 months into the operation. Operations update No 4 was issued on 29 February 2012 to extend the timeframe of the operation from 31st March to 30 June 2012 to cover the funding agreement with the American Embassy in Cameroon. PBR No M1111087 was submitted as final report of this operation to the American Embassy in Cameroon on 03 August 2012. Throughout the operation, Cameroon Red Cross volunteers sensitized the populations on PBR No M1111127 was submitted as final report of this how to avoid cholera. Photo/IFRC operation to the British Red Cross on 14 August 2012. Summary: A serious cholera epidemic affected Cameroon since 2010.
    [Show full text]