American Museum Novitates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unexpected Diversity in Neelipleona Revealed by Molecular Phylogeny Approach (Hexapoda, Collembola)
S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 383–398 ISSN: 1864-6417 Unexpected diversity in Neelipleona revealed by molecular phylogeny approach (Hexapoda, Collembola) Clément Schneider1, 3, Corinne Cruaud2 and Cyrille A. D’Haese1 1 UMR7205 CNRS, Département Systématique et Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP50 Entomology, 45 rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France 2 Genoscope, Centre National de Sequençage, 2 rue G. Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry cedex, France 3 Corresponding author: Clément Schneider (email: [email protected]) Abstract Neelipleona are the smallest of the four Collembola orders in term of species number with 35 species described worldwide (out of around 8000 known Collembola). Despite this apparent poor diversity, Neelipleona have a worldwide repartition. The fact that the most commonly observed species, Neelus murinus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax minimus Willem, 1900, display cosmopolitan repartition is striking. A cladistic analysis based on 16S rDNA, COX1 and 28S rDNA D1 and D2 regions, for a broad collembolan sampling was performed. This analysis included 24 representatives of the Neelipleona genera Neelus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax Willem, 1900 from various regions. The interpretation of the phylogenetic pattern and number of transformations (branch length) indicates that Neelipleona are more diverse than previously thought, with probably many species yet to be discovered. These results buttress the rank of Neelipleona as a whole order instead of a Symphypleona family. Keywords: Collembola, Neelidae, Megalothorax, Neelus, COX1, 16S, 28S 1. Introduction 1.1. Brief history of Neelipleona classification The Neelidae family was established by Folsom (1896), who described Neelus murinus from Cambridge (USA). -
Reviews of the Genera Schaefferia Absolon, 1900, Deuteraphorura
TAR Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 5 (2012) 35–85 brill.nl/tar Reviews of the genera Schaefferia Absolon, 1900, Deuteraphorura Absolon, 1901, Plutomurus Yosii, 1956 and the Anurida Laboulbène, 1865 species group without eyes, with the description of four new species of cave springtails (Collembola) from Krubera-Voronya cave, Arabika Massif, Abkhazia Rafael Jordana1, Enrique Baquero1*, Sofía Reboleira2 and Alberto Sendra3 1Department of Zoology and Ecology, University of Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] *Corresponding author. 2Department of Biology, Universidade de Aveiro and CESAM Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 3Museu Valencià d’Història Natural (Fundación Entomológica Torres Sala) Paseo de la Pechina 15. 46008 Valencia, Spain e-mail: [email protected] Received on November 4, 2011. Accepted on November 21, 2011 Summary Krubera-Voronya cave and other deep systems in Arabika Massif are being explored during many speleological expeditions. A recent Ibero-Russian exploration expedition (summer of 2010) took place in this cave with the aim of providing a study of the biocenosis of the deepest known cave in the world. Four new species of Collembola were found at different depths: Schaefferia profundissima n. sp., Anurida stereoodorata n. sp., Deuteraphorura kruberaensis n. sp., and Plutomurus ortobalaganensis n. sp., the last one at -1980 m deep. The identification and description of the new species have required the careful study of all congeneric species, implying a revision of each genus. As a result of this work tables and keys to all significant characters for each species are presented. -
Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007). -
Annotated Checklist of Collembola of Nepal
ISSN: 2705-4403 (Print) & 2705-4411 (Online) www.cdztu.edu.np/njz Vol. 5 | Issue 1 | June 2021 https://doi.org/10.3126/njz.v5i1.38287 Checklist Annotated checklist of Collembola of Nepal Prem Bahadur Budha 1* | Pratistha Shrestha1 1Central Department of Zoology, Institute of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal *Correspondence: [email protected] Suggested citation: Budha, P. B. Abstract and Shrestha, P. 2021. Annotated checklist of collembola of Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Zoology This is the first annotated checklist of Collembola species of Nepal. It includes 167 collembolan species belonging to 78 genera and 5(1):22–33. 17 families including 45 endemic species. Majority of the Nepalese collembolan species were reported from major trekking routes viz. https://doi.org/10.3126/njz.v5i1.38287 Mount Everest, Annapurna Conservation Area and Langtang area with very few other locations. The highest record of collembola in Article History: Nepal is about 5800 m asl. Southern Terai and Siwalik range remain unexplored. Received: 05 October 2020 Revised: 17 June 2021 Accepted: 25 June 2021 Keywords: Endemic species; Hexapods; Himalanura; Nepalanura; Springtails Publisher’s note: The editorial board (Natural History) Museum expedition to Nepal. The major and the publisher of the NJZ remain 1 | Introduction neutral to the opinions expressed and taxonomic contributions on Nepalese Collembola were done only are not responsible for the accuracy of the results and maps presented by Collembola, commonly known as in late 1960s. Yosii (1966a, b, 1971) reported more than 60 the authors. springtails are widely distributed species with the description of two new genera viz. -
Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Palacios-Vargas, José G. Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 220-231 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42529679040 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio. -
Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 187–195 (2019) Collembola of Canada 187 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Collembola of Canada Matthew S. Turnbull1, Sophya Stebaeva2 1 Unaffiliated, Kingston, Ontario, Canada2 The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Aca- demy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Corresponding author: Matthew S. Turnbull ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 16 January 2018 | Accepted 8 May 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/3A331779-19A1-41DA-AFCF-81AAD4CB049F Citation: Turnbull MS, Stebaeva S (2019) Collembola of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 187–195.https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 Abstract The state of knowledge of diversity of Collembola in Canada was assessed by examination of literature and DNA barcode data. There are 474 described extant Collembola species known from Canada, a significant change compared to the 520 species estimated to occur in Canada in 1979 (Richards 1979) and the 341 reported in the most recent national checklist (Skidmore 1993). Given the number of indeterminate or cryptic species records, the dearth of sampling in many regions, and the growing use of genetic biodiversity assessment methods such as Barcode Index Numbers, we estimate the total diversity of Collembola in Canada to be approximately 675 species. Advances in Collembola systematics and Canadian research are discussed. Keywords biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, Collembola, springtails Collembola, commonly known as springtails, is a class of small, entognathous, wing- less hexapods that is a sister group to Insecta. -
Evidence for Cryptic Diversity in the “Pan-Antarctic” Springtail Friesea Antarctica and the Description of Two New Species
insects Article Evidence for Cryptic Diversity in the “Pan-Antarctic” Springtail Friesea antarctica and the Description of Two New Species Antonio Carapelli 1,* , Penelope Greenslade 2, Francesco Nardi 1 , Chiara Leo 1 , Peter Convey 3 , Francesco Frati 1 and Pietro Paolo Fanciulli 1 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via A. Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy; [email protected] (F.N.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (P.P.F.) 2 Environmental Management, School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia; [email protected] 3 British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0577-234-410 Received: 31 January 2020; Accepted: 20 February 2020; Published: 25 February 2020 Abstract: The invertebrate terrestrial fauna of Antarctica is being investigated with increasing interest to discover how life interacts with the extreme polar environment and how millions of years of evolution have shaped their biodiversity. Classical taxonomic approaches, complemented by molecular tools, are improving our understanding of the systematic relationships of some species, changing the nomenclature of taxa and challenging the taxonomic status of others. The springtail Friesea grisea has previously been described as the only species with a “pan-Antarctic” distribution. However, recent genetic comparisons have pointed to another scenario. The latest morphological study has confined F. grisea to the sub-Antarctic island of South Georgia, from which it was originally described, and resurrected F. antarctica as a congeneric species occurring on the continental mainland. -
ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000). -
Pennsylvania Statewide Seasonal Pool Ecosystem Classification
Pennsylvania Statewide Seasonal Pool Ecosystem Classification Description, mapping, and classification of seasonal pools, their associated plant and animal communities, and the surrounding landscape April 2009 Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program i Cover photo by: Betsy Leppo, Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program ii Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program is a partnership of: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, and Pennsylvania Game Commission. The project was funded by: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Wild Resource Conservation Program Grant no. WRCP-06187 U.S. EPA State Wetland Protection Development Grant no. CD-973493-01 Suggested report citation: Leppo, B., Zimmerman, E., Ray, S., Podniesinski, G., and Furedi, M. 2009. Pennsylvania Statewide Seasonal Pool Ecosystem Classification: Description, mapping, and classification of seasonal pools, their associated plant and animal communities, and the surrounding landscape. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh, PA. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following organizations, agencies, and people for their time and support of this project: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) Wild Resource Conservation Program (WRCP), who funded this study as part of their effort to encourage protection of wetland resources. Our appreciation to Greg Czarnecki (DCNR-WRCP) and Greg Podniesinski (DCNR-Office of Conservation Science (OCS)), who administered the EPA and WRCP funds for this work. We greatly appreciate the long hours in the field and lab logged by Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (WPC) staff including Kathy Derge Gipe, Ryan Miller, and Amy Myers. To Tim Maret, and Larry Klotz of Shippensburg University, Aura Stauffer of the PA Bureau of Forestry, and Eric Lindquist of Messiah College, we appreciate the advice you provided as we developed this project. -
Les Jardins, Réservoirs De Biodiversité Taxonomique Et Fonctionnelle
AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite encourt une poursuite pénale. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm Université de Lorraine Ecole doctorale Ressources, Procédés, Produits et Environnement Laboratoire Sols et Environnement UL-INRA UMR 1120 Thèse présentée en vue de l’obtention du titre de Docteur de l’Université de Lorraine Spécialité : Sciences Agronomiques Biodiversité et caractéristiques physicochimiques des sols de jardins associatifs urbains français par Sophie JOIMEL Soutenue publiquement le 9 mars 2015 Composition du jury : Jérôme CORTET, Maître de Conférences, Université de Montpellier III Co-Directeur Philippe CLERGEAU, Professeur, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris Examinateur Thibaud DECAENS, Professeur, Université de Montpellier II Rapporteur Camille DUMAT, Professeur, ENSAT, Toulouse Rapporteur Thierry DUTOIT, Directeur de Recherche, CNRS, Avignon Examinateur Jean Louis MOREL, Professeur, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Examinateur Johanne NAHMANI, Chargée de recherche, CNRS, Montpellier Examinateur Christophe SCHWARTZ, Professeur, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Co-Directeur Remerciements « On ne se souvient pas des jours, on se souvient des instants. » Cesare Pavese Et voilà venu le moment de porter la touche finale à ce manuscrit : les remerciements. -
Collembola (Entognatha) from East Africa
Eur. J. Entomol. 95: 217-237, 1998 ISSN 1210-5759 Collembola (Entognatha) from East Africa W anda M. WEINER1 and Judith NAJT2 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Slawkowska 17, PL-31016 Krakdw, Poland 2EP 90 du CNRS, Laboratoire d’Entomologie, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 45, rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France Collembola, Hypogastruridae, Odontellidae, Neanuridae, Onychiuridae, Isotomidae, East Africa, identification keys, new species, redescription Abstract. Materials of Hypogastruridae, Odontellidae, Neanuridae, Onychiuridae and Isotomidae from East Africa were studied. Several new species are described: Acherontiella kowalskiorum sp. n., Furcu- lanurida grandcolasorum sp. n., Stachorutes dallaii sp. n., and Paleonura cassagnaui sp. n. Friesea vtorovi Tshelnokov, 1977 and Tullbergia kilimanjarica (Delamare Deboutteville, 1953) are redescribed. Stachorutes arlei (Thibaud & Massoud, 1980) is a new combination. Identification keys for Friesea Dalla Torre, 1895 with 2 + 2 eyes and Stachorutes Dallai, 1973 are given. INTRODUCTION The last systematic account on the Collembola of East Africa was presented by Dehar- veng and Diaz in 1984 with a review of all references concerning this region. The present study is based on the material collected in Tanzania and Kenya. Abbreviations . ISEA - Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sci ences, Krakdw, Poland; MNHN - Laboratoire d ’Entomologie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT Family Hypogastruridae Ceratophysella denticulata Bagnall, 1941 M aterial examined . Tanzania, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, 2,200 m a.s.l., brink of the crater, dry forest near Sopa Lodge, 28.viii.1996, lgt. B. & K. Kowalski, 2 specimens: $ and 6 juv. Geographical distribution . -
Second Contribution to the Knowledge of the Springtail Fauna of the White Mountains (Lefká Óri) in West Crete (Insecta: Collembola)
Mitt. internat. entomol. Ver. Frankfurt a.M. ISSN 1019-2808 Band 32 . Heft 3/4 Seiten 175 - 183 22. November 2007 Second contribution to the knowledge of the springtail fauna of the White Mountains (Lefká Óri) in West Crete (Insecta: Collembola) Hans-Jürgen SCHULZ Abstract: This paper describes the results of Collembola collecting in more than 30 sites of the White Mountains. The collections are mostly based on moss and upper soil-layer samples. Besides widespread species, some rare species were found (e.g. Anurophorus coiffaiti and Crypto- pygus triglenus). 12 species are new for Crete. Key words: Collembola, species list, mountain region, Crete Introduction The “Species list of the fauna Europaea” lists 76 springtail species or subspecies for the island Crete (last update March 2005, http:// faunaeur.org/species_list.php). These data are mainly based on ELLIS (1976). He collected within the Iráklion region (sampling list with 50 sites). A recent study of the collembolan fauna from Crete was published by SCHULZ & LYMBERAKIS (2006). They recorded 22 Collembola species (pitfall trap samples from 4 sites near the mountain village Anopolis, western Crete). The present contribution continues the study of collem- bolan fauna of Crete, especially of its mountain regions. Material and methods Collembolan sampling was carried out between 5-24 and 6-9-2004 in nearly 30 different sites. More than 200 samples (mostly moss and litter 175 layer) were taken and extracted in modified Berlese devices. Additionally an aspirator was used for collecting springtails from stones. Fig. 1: Mountain area near the Kallergi cottage. Many aspirator collec- tions from the stones were taken here.