Download PDF of Abstracts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module, IG-01-027
IG-01-027 AUDIT ACQUISITION OF THE SPACE STATION REPORT PROPULSION MODULE May 21, 2001 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing at (202) 358-1232, or visit www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/issuedaudits.html. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Assistant Inspector General for Auditing Code W NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 NASA Hotline To report fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement contact the NASA Hotline at (800) 424-9183, (800) 535-8134 (TDD), or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/hotline.html#form; or write to the NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, DC 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. Reader Survey Please complete the reader survey at the end of this report or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/audits.html. Acronyms ATV Autonomous Transfer Vehicle FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation FGB Functional Energy Block GAO General Accounting Office ICM Interim Control Module ISS International Space Station NPD NASA Policy Directive NPG NASA Procedures and Guidelines OIG Office of Inspector General OMB Office of Management and Budget OPTS Orbiter Propellant Transfer System SRR Systems Requirements Review USPM United States Propulsion Module USPS United States Propulsion System W May 21, 2001 TO: A/Administrator FROM: W/Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module Report Number IG-01-027 The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) has completed an Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module. -
A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS)
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2011 A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2 Chad Lee Davis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons, Other Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Chad Lee, "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/965 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Chad Lee Davis entitled "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aerospace Engineering. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 144 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1998 No. 88 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 14, 1998, at 12:30 p.m. Senate TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1998 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was SCHEDULE as we can. Members have to expect called to order by the President pro Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, this morn- votes late on Monday afternoons and tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. ing the Senate will immediately pro- on Fridays also. We certainly need all ceed to a vote on a motion to invoke Senators’ cooperation to get this work PRAYER cloture on the motion to proceed to the done. We did get time agreements at The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John product liability bill. If cloture is in- the end of the session before we went Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: voked, the Senate will debate the mo- out for the Fourth of July recess period Gracious God, our prayer is not to tion to proceed until the policy lunch- on higher education and also on a overcome Your reluctance to help us eons at 12:30 p.m., and following the package of energy bills. So we will know and do Your will, for You have policy luncheons, it is expected the work those in at the earliest possible created us to love, serve, and obey Senate will resume consideration of opportunity this week or next week. -
NSIAD-99-175 Space Station B-280328
United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters August 1999 SPACE STATION Russian Commitment and Cost Control Problems GAO/NSIAD-99-175 United States General Accounting Office National Security and Washington, D.C. 20548 International Affairs Division B-280328 Letter August 17, 1999 The Honorable John McCain Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation United States Senate The Honorable Bill Frist Chairman, Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation United States Senate The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) faces many challenges in developing and building the International Space Station (ISS). These challenges, such as Russian difficulty in completing its components on schedule due to insufficient funding and continuing U.S. prime contractor cost increases, have translated into schedule delays and higher program cost estimates to complete development. As requested, we reviewed the status of Russian involvement in the ISS program. We also examined the prime contractor’s progress in implementing cost control measures and NASA’s efforts to oversee the program’s nonprime activity. Specifically, we (1) assessed NASA’s progress in developing contingency plans to mitigate the possibility of Russian nonperformance and the loss or delay of other critical components, (2) identified NASA’s efforts to ensure that Russian quality assurance processes meet the station’s safety requirements, and (3) determined the effectiveness of cost control efforts regarding the prime contract and nonprime activities. Results in Brief As an ISS partner, Russia agreed to provide equipment, such as the Service Module, Progress vehicles to reboost the station, dry cargo, and related launch services throughout the station’s life.1 However, Russia’s funding problems have delayed delivery of the Service Module—the first major Russian-funded component—and raised questions about its ability to support the station during and after assembly. -
1St Annual ISS Research and Development Conference Results and Opportunities – the Decade of Utilization
1st Annual ISS Research and Development Conference Results and Opportunities – The Decade of Utilization June 26-27, 2012 Denver Marriott City Center 1701 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 www.astronautical.org 1st Annual ISS Research and Development Conference June 26-27, 2012 Denver Marriott City Center, 1701 California Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 Organized by the American Astronautical Society in cooperation with the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space Inc. (CASIS) and NASA Sponsored by: The International Space Station (ISS) – Scientific Laboratory Technology Testbed Orbiting Outpost Galactic Observatory Innovation Engine Student Inspiration. This conference focuses on ISS R & D — research results and future opportunities in physical sciences, life sciences, Earth and space sciences, and spacecraft technology development. Plenary sessions will highlight major results and pathways to future opportunities. Organizations managing and funding research on ISS, including NASA programs and the ISS National Laboratory will provide overviews of upcoming opportunities. Parallel technical sessions will provide tracks for scientists to be updated on significant accomplishments to date within their disciplines. On June 28. NASA will conduct a separate workshop designed to help new users take this information and develop their own ideas for experiments using this unique laboratory, as well as a SBIR Technologies workshop. Potential ISS users who attend will learn: “What can I do on the ISS? How can I do it?” This is the only annual gathering offering perspectives on the full breadth of research and technology development on ISS, and includes one stop for the full suite of opportunities for future research. Page 2 Conference Technical Co-Chairs Conference Planning Dr. -
The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status
The Space Congress® Proceedings 1998 (35th) Horizons Unlimited Apr 28th, 2:00 PM Paper Session I-B - The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status Daniel V. Jacobs Manager, Russian Integration, International Partners Office, International Space Station ogrPr am, NASA, JSC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Jacobs, Daniel V., "Paper Session I-B - The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status" (1998). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 18. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1998-35th/april-28-1998/18 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION: BACKGROUND AND CURRENT STATUS Daniel V. Jacobs Manager, Russian Integration, International Partners Office International Space Station Program, NASA Johnson Space Center Introduction The International Space Station, as the largest international civil program in history, features unprecedented technical, managerial, and international complexity. Seven interna- tional partners and participants encompassing fifteen countries are involved in the ISS. Each partner is designing, developing and will be operating separate pieces of hardware, to be inte- grated on-orbit into a single orbital station. Mission control centers, launch vehicles, astronauts/ cosmonauts, and support services will be provided by multiple partners, but functioning in a coordinated, integrated fashion. A number of major milestones have been accomplished to date, including the construction of major elements of flight hardware, the development of opera- tions and sustaining engineering centers, astronaut training, and seven Space Shuttle/Mir docking missions. -
Astro2020 Science White Paper Cosmic Evolution of Supermassive
Astro2020 Science White Paper Cosmic evolution of supermassive black holes: A view into the next two decades Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Authors: Francesca Civano1 (E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1 617-792-3190), Nico Cappelluti2, Ryan Hickox3, Rebecca Canning4;5 Co-authors: James Aird 6, Marco Ajello 7, Steve Allen 4;5, Eduardo Banados˜ 8, Laura Blecha 9, William N. Brandt 10, Marcella Brusa 11, Francisco Carrera 12, Massimo Cappi 13, Andrea Comastri 13, Klaus Dolag 14;15, Megan Donahue 16, Martin Elvis 1, Giuseppina Fabbiano 1, Francesca Fornasini 1, Poshak Gandhi 17, Antonis Georgakakis 18, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann 19, Anton Koekemoer 20, Andrew Goulding 21, Mackenzie Jones 1, Sibasish Laha 22, Stephanie LaMassa 20, Giorgio Lanzuisi 13, Lauranne Lanz 3, Adam Mantz 4;5, Stefano Marchesi 7, Mar Mezcua 23, Beatriz Mingo 24, Kirpal Nandra 18, Daniel Stern 25;26, Doug Swartz 27, Grant Tremblay 1, Panayiotis Tzanavaris 28, Alexey Vikhlinin 1, Fabio Vito 29;30, Belinda Wilkes 1 Abstract: The discoveries made over the past 20 years by Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys in conjunc- tion with multiwavelength imaging and spectroscopic data available in the same fields have signif- icantly changed the view of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) and galaxy connection. These discoveries have opened up several exciting questions that are beyond the capabilities of current X-ray telescopes and will need to be addressed by observatories in the next two decades. -
A Call for a New Human Missions Cost Model
A Call For A New Human Missions Cost Model NASA 2019 Cost and Schedule Analysis Symposium NASA Johnson Space Center, August 13-15, 2019 Joseph Hamaker, PhD Christian Smart, PhD Galorath Human Missions Cost Model Advocates Dr. Joseph Hamaker Dr. Christian Smart Director, NASA and DoD Programs Chief Scientist • Former Director for Cost Analytics • Founding Director of the Cost and Parametric Estimating for the Analysis Division at NASA U.S. Missile Defense Agency Headquarters • Oversaw development of the • Originator of NASA’s NAFCOM NASA/Air Force Cost Model cost model, the NASA QuickCost (NAFCOM) Model, the NASA Cost Analysis • Provides subject matter expertise to Data Requirement and the NASA NASA Headquarters, DARPA, and ONCE database Space Development Agency • Recognized expert on parametrics 2 Agenda Historical human space projects Why consider a new Human Missions Cost Model Database for a Human Missions Cost Model • NASA has over 50 years of Human Space Missions experience • NASA’s International Partners have accomplished additional projects . • There are around 70 projects that can provide cost and schedule data • This talk will explore how that data might be assembled to form the basis for a Human Missions Cost Model WHY A NEW HUMAN MISSIONS COST MODEL? NASA’s Artemis Program plans to Artemis needs cost and schedule land humans on the moon by 2024 estimates Lots of projects: Lunar Gateway, Existing tools have some Orion, landers, SLS, commercially applicability but it seems obvious provided elements (which we may (to us) that a dedicated HMCM is want to independently estimate) needed Some of these elements have And this can be done—all we ongoing cost trajectories (e.g. -
COS Observations of the Cosmic Web: a Search for the Cooler Components of a Hot, X-Ray Identified Filament
Draft version November 15, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 COS Observations of the Cosmic Web: A Search for the Cooler Components of a Hot, X-ray Identified Filament Thomas Connor ,1 Fakhri S. Zahedy ,2, 3 Hsiao-Wen Chen ,2, 4 Thomas J. Cooper ,3 John S. Mulchaey ,3 and Alexey Vikhlinin 5 1The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA 2Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 3The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA 4Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 5Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA (Received 2019 July 17; Revised 2019 September 14; Accepted 2019 September 18; Published 2019 October 10) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT In the local universe, a large fraction of the baryon content is believed to exist as diffuse gas in filaments. While this gas is directly observable in X-ray emission around clusters of galaxies, it is primarily studied through its UV absorption. Recently, X-ray observations of large-scale filaments connecting to the cosmic web around the nearby (z = 0:05584) cluster Abell 133 were reported. One of these filaments is intersected by the sightline to quasar [VV98] J010250.2 220929, allowing for a − first-ever census of cold, cool, and warm gas in a filament of the cosmic web where hot gas has been seen in X-ray emission. Here, we present UV observations with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph and optical observations with the Magellan Echellette spectrograph of [VV98] J010250.2 220929. -
ESA's ISS External Payloads
number 8, march 2002 on station The Newsletter of the Directorate of Manned Spaceflight and Microgravity http://www.esa.int/spaceflight in this issue A Promising Start to 2002 aurora Jörg Feustel-Büechl Aurora: A European Roadmap 4 ESA Director of Manned Spaceflight and Microgravity for Solar System Exploration Rolf Schulze I want to highlight two very important milestones for this year. Firstly, the final integration and test of our Columbus virtual campus laboratory for the International Space Station began at The Erasmus Virtual Campus 6 Astrium GmbH in Bremen (D) following the arrival in Dieter Isakeit September of the Pre-Integrated Columbus Assembly (PICA) from Alenia Spazio in Turin (I). I believe that we have a payloads masterpiece of European engineering here, and I am ESA’s ISS External Payloads 8 delighted with the progress so far.We should be seeing some Steve Feltham & Giacinto Gianfiglio very real advance on Columbus by the end of 2002 and look forward to its status then. xeus Secondly, I had the opportunity on 15 January to review ISS Assembly of XEUS 10 the course of the Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) project at Jens Schiemann Les Mureaux (F), together with our team and the industries involved in the project under prime contractor EADS-LV.The spoe progress is quite remarkable when we remember the SPOE 12 difficulties of last year. All in all, I think that the technical Rolf-Dieter Andresen, Maurizio Nati achievements so far are satisfactory. One important & Chris Taylor demonstration of this progress is the arrival of the ATV Structural Test Model in ESTEC’s Test Centre, where it will research undergo testing during the whole of this year. -
Astro2010: the Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey
Astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey Notices of Interest 1. 4 m space telescope for terrestrial planet imaging and wide field astrophysics Point of Contact: Roger Angel, University of Arizona Summary Description: The proposed 4 m telescope combines capabilities for imaging terrestrial exoplanets and for general astrophysics without compromising either. Extremely high contrast imaging at very close inner working angle, as needed for terrestrial planet imaging, is accomplished by the powerful phase induced amplitude apodization method (PIAA) developed by Olivier Guyon. This method promises 10-10 contrast at 2.0 l/D angular separation, i.e. 50 mas for a 4 m telescope at 500 nm wavelength. The telescope primary mirror is unobscured with off-axis figure, as needed to achieve such high contrast. Despite the off-axis primary, the telescope nevertheless provides also a very wide field for general astrophysics. A 3 mirror anastigmat design by Jim Burge delivers a 6 by 24 arcminute field whose mean wavefront error of 12 nm rms, i.e.diffraction limited at 360 nm wavelength. Over the best 10 square arcminutes the rms error is 7 nm, for diffraction limited imaging at 200 nm wavelength. Any of the instruments can be fed by part or all of the field, by means of a flat steering mirror at the exit pupil. To allow for this, the field is curved with a radius equal to the distance from the exit pupil. The entire optical system fits in a 4 m diameter cylinder, 8 m long. Many have considered that only by using two spacecraft, a conventional on-axis telescope and a remote occulter, could high contrast and wide field imaging goals be reconciled. -
NL#145 March/April
March/April 2009 Issue 145 A Publication for the members of the American Astronomical Society 3 President’s Column John Huchra, [email protected] Council Actions I have just come back from the Long Beach meeting, and all I can say is “wow!” We received many positive comments on both the talks and the high level of activity at the meeting, and the breakout 4 town halls and special sessions were all well attended. Despite restrictions on the use of NASA funds AAS Election for meeting travel we had nearly 2600 attendees. We are also sorry about the cold floor in the big hall, although many joked that this was a good way to keep people awake at 8:30 in the morning. The Results meeting had many high points, including, for me, the announcement of this year’s prize winners and a call for the Milky Way to go on a diet—evidence was presented for a near doubling of its mass, making us a one-to-one analogue of Andromeda. That also means that the two galaxies will crash into each 4 other much sooner than previously expected. There were kickoffs of both the International Year of Pasadena Meeting Astronomy (IYA), complete with a wonderful new movie on the history of the telescope by Interstellar Studios, and the new Astronomy & Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Astro2010 (more on that later). We also had thought provoking sessions on science in Australia and astronomy in China. My personal 6 prediction is that the next decade will be the decade of international collaboration as science, especially astronomy and astrophysics, continues to become more and more collaborative and international in Highlights from nature.