DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA's International Relations in Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA's International Relations in Space Notes 1 Introduction and Historical Overview: NASA’s International Relations in Space 1. James R. Hansen, First Man. The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2005), 493. 2. Ibid., 393, 503. 3. Ibid., 505. 4. For survey of the historical literature, see Roger D. Launius, “Interpreting the Moon Landings: Project Apollo and the Historians,” History and Technology 22:3 (September 2006), 225–255. On the gendering of the Apollo program, see Margaret A. Weitekamp, The Right Stuff, the Wrong Sex: The Lovelace Women in the Space Program (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004); “The ‘Astronautrix’ and the ‘Magnificent Male.’ Jerrie Cobb’s Quest to be the First Woman in America’s Manned Space pro- gram,” in Avital H. Bloch and Lauri Umansky (eds.), Impossible to Hold. Women and Culture in the 1960s (New York: New York University Press), 9–28. 5. Hansen, First Man , 513–514. 6. Sunny Tsiao, “Read You Loud and Clear.” The Story of NASA’s Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network (Washington, DC: NASA SP-2007–4232), Chapter 5 . 7. Experiment Operations during Apollo EVAs. Experiment: Solar Wind Experiment, http://ares.jsc.nasa.gov/humanexplore/exploration/exlibrary/docs/apollocat/ part1/swc.htm (accessed August 31, 2008). 8. Thomas A. Sullivan, Catalog of Apollo Experiment Operations (Washington, DC: NASA Reference Publication 1317, 1994), 113–116. Geiss’s team also measured the amounts of rare gases trapped in lunar rocks: P. Eberhart and J. Geiss, et al., “Trapped Solar Wind Noble Gases, Exposure Age and K/Ar Age in Apollo 11 Lunar Fine Material,” in A. A. Levinson (ed.), Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Science Conference, Houston Texas, January 5–8, 1970, Vol. 2. Chemical and Isotopic Analysis, 1037–1070. 9. Hansen, First Man , 395. 10. This is true of scholarly works like Hansen’s First Man , Chapter 29 , as well of accounts specifically concerned with lunar science, like William David Compton’s, Where No Man Has Gone Before. A History of Apollo Lunar Exploration Missions (Washington, DC: NASA SP-4214, 1989), autobiographical accounts like Buzz Aldrin’s Return to Earth , Chapter 8 , and semipopular works like Leon Wagener’s One Giant Leap. Neil Armstrong’s Stellar American Journey (New York: Forge Books, 2004), Chapter 14 . None of these sources mentions either that the Swiss experiment was deployed before the American flag was unfurled. One has to burrow deep into the official records to extract this data (see Experiment Operations during Apollo EVAs ). See also Peter Creola interview, Bern, Switzerland, by John Krige, May 25, 2007, NHRC. For Creola’s own role in space, see Anon., Peter Creola. Advocate of Space (Noordwijk: European Space Agency, ESA SP-1265/E, 2002). 284 NOTES 11. Howard E. McCurdy, Space and the American Imagination (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997). 12. John Logsdon, “Die deutsche Weltraumforschung in transatlantischer Perspective,” in Helmuth Trischler and Kai-Uwe Schrogl (eds.), Ein Jahrhundert im Flug, Luft- und Raumfahrtforschung in Deutschland 1907–2007 (Frankfurt Am Main: Campus Verlag, 2007). 13. Howard E. McCurdy, The Space Station Decision. Incremental Politics and Technological Choice (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990). 14. The Act is available at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/spaceact.html (accessed January 27, 2005). 15. Gerald Haines, “The National Reconnaissance Office. Its Origins, Creation and Early Years,” in Dwayne A. Day, John M. Logsdon, and Brian Latell (eds.), Eye in the Sky. The Story of the Corona Spy Satellites (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998), 143–156. 16. On the IGY, see Rip Bulkley, The Sputniks Crisis and Early United States Space Policy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991); Fae L. Kosmo, “The Genesis of the International Geophysical Year,” Physics Today , July 2007: 38–43; and Allan Needell, Science, Cold War and the American State: Lloyd V. Berkner and the Balance of Professional Ideals (Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000). 17. Arnold W. Frutkin, International Cooperation in Space (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1965), 31. 18. Eilene Galloway, “Organizing the United States Government for Outer Space, 1957–1958,” in Roger Launius, John M. Logsdon, and Robert W. Smith (eds.), Reconsidering Sputnik. Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000), 309–325, 322. See also “The Woman Who Helped Create NASA,” http://www.nasa.gov/topics/history/galloway_space_act.html (accessed September 20, 2008). 19. Andrew G. Haley, Space Law and Government (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963), 313–328. 20. John Lewis Gaddis, The Long Peace. Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), Chapter 7 . 21. NASA Key Personnel Change, June 1, 1979, Record no. 726, Folder 11.2.1, Frutkin, Arnold W., NHRC. 22. Release 85–132, September 20, 1985, Record no. 000137, Folder, Barnes, Richard J. H., NHRC. 23. Special Announcement, February 1, 1979; Release 88–160, November 21, 1988, Record no. 1669, Folder, Pedersen, Kenneth S., NHRC. 24. Release 90–7, August 2, 1990; Release 91–3, January 7, 1991, Record no. 1669, Folder, Pedersen, Kenneth S., NHRC. 25. The organigram is available at http://oiir.hq.nasa.gov/organization.html . 26. Arnold Frutkin, “International Collaboration in Space,” Science 169:3943 (July 24, 1970), 333–339. 27. Michael O’Brien, Global Reach. A View of NASA’s International Cooperation (Washington, DC: NASA NP-2008–01–492-HQ, 2008). 28. John Logsdon, “U.S.-European Cooperation in Space Science: A 25-Year Perspective,” Science 223:4631 (January 6, 1984), 11–16. 29. Roger D. Launius, “NASA and the Attitude of the U.S. Toward International Space Cooperation,” in Les relations franco-am é ricains dans le domaine spatial (1957–1975). Quatri è me recontre de l’IFHE, 8–9 d é cembre 2005 (Paris: IFHE Publications, 2008), 45–63, at 53. 30. Marcia S. Smith, “America’s International Space Activities,” Society 21:2 (January/ February 1984), 18–25. 31. Tsiao, Read You Loud and Clear. For a review, see NASA News and Notes 25:3 (August 2008), 1–5. The system comprised four tracking programs: mini-track, a NOTES 285 north-south network through the Western hemisphere for scientific satellites; the deep-space network; the manned space flight ground stations; and the Baker-Nunn tracking stations for a Smithsonian astrophysics program. For an account of the last, see Teasel Muir-Harmony, “Tracking Diplomacy: The IGY and American Scientific and Technical Exchange with East Asia,” in Roger Launius, Jim Fleming, and David de Vorkin (eds.), Globalizing Polar Science: Reconsidering the International Polar and Geophysical Years (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 279–306. 32. Frutkin, International Cooperation in Space. 33. In the Introduction to 26 Years of NASA International Programs , signed by the International Affairs Division, then headed by Ken Pedersen, who also wrote the fore- word to the booklet. 34. Frutkin, International Cooperation in Space , 34. 35. Ibid., 35. 36. Logsdon, “U.S.-European Cooperation,” 11–16. 37. Frutkin, International Cooperation in Space , 33. 38. For these objections see Logsdon, “U.S.-European Cooperation,” 13. 39. For a summary account, see Joan Johnson-Freese, Changing Patterns of International Collaboration in Space (Malabar FL: Orbit Books, 1990), Chapter 6 ; Smith, “America’s International Space Activities,” 19. 40. See John Krige, “Technology, Foreign Policy and International Cooperation in Space,” in Steven J. Dick and Roger D. Launius (eds.), Critical Issues in the History of Spaceflight (Washington, DC: NASA-SP-2006–4702, 2006), 239–262. 41. Hermann Pollack, “International Relations in Space. A US View,” Space Policy 4:1 (February 1988), 24–30, at 24. 42. Kenneth S. Pedersen, “The Changing Face of International Space Cooperation. One View of NASA,” Space Policy 2 (May 1986), 120–135, at 130. See also Johnson- Freese, Changing Patterns , Chapter 9 ; and Smith, “America’s International Space Activities.” 43. Kenneth S. Pedersen, “Thoughts on International Space Cooperation and Interests in the Post-Cold War World,” Space Policy 8:3 (1992), 205–220, at 208. 44. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, U.S.- Russian Cooperation in Space, OTA-ISS-618 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, April 1995), 81. 45. Pedersen, “Thoughts on International Space Cooperation,” at 216. 46. Eligar Sadeh, “Technical, Organizational and Political Dynamics of the International Space Station Program,” Space Policy 20 (2004), 171–188, at 173; emphasis mine. For the early history of the station, see John M. Logsdon, Together in Orbit. The Origins of International Participation in Space Station Freedom (Washington, DC: Space Policy Institute, George Washington University, December 1991); Howard E. McCurdy, The Space Station Decision. Incremental Politics and Technological Choice (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007). 47. U.S.-Russian Cooperation in Space , 76. 48. Quoted in Sadeh, “Technical, Organizational,” 174. 49. Paul B. Stares, The Militarization of Space. U.S. Policy 1945–1984 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), 42–43. 50. Final Report to the President on the U.S. Space Program, January 1993 , submitted by NASA administrator Dan Goldin to President H. W. Bush, on January 7, 1993, avail- able at http://history.NASA..gov/33082.pt1.pdf (accessed on December 15, 2008). 51. Demian McLean, “Obama Moves to Counter China with Pentagon-NASA Link,” Bloomberg.com, January 2, 2009, available at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ bloomberg/20090102/pl_bloomberg/aovrno0oj41g/print (accessed on January 4, 2009). 52. Marcia S. Smith, U.S. Space Programs: Civilian, Military, Commercial , CRS Issue Brief for Congress, updated November 7, 2005, available at http://www.unm. edu/~cstp/v_library.html (accessed on January 19, 2013). 286 NOTES 2 NASA, Space Science, and Western Europe 1. Arnold W. Frutkin, International Cooperation in Space (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965), Chapter 2 . 2. On COSPAR, see Newell, Beyond the Atmosphere. Early Years of Space Science (Washington, DC: NASA SP-4211, 1980), Chapter 18 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weather Reporting -- Volume C2
    WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Weather y Climate y Water World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Edition World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 COPYRIGHT © World Meteorological Organization © Organisation météorologique mondiale The right of publication in print, electronic and any other L’OMM se réserve le droit de publication en version imprimée form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts ou électronique ou sous toute autre forme et dans n’importe from WMO publications may be reproduced without quelle langue. De courts extraits des publications de l’OMM authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly peuvent être reproduits sans autorisation, pour autant que la indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, source complète soit clairement indiquée. La correspondance reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole relative au contenu rédactionnel
    [Show full text]
  • Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration
    ICEUM4, 10-15 July 2000, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration Gulnara Omarova, National Aerospace Agency; Chinghis Omarov, ISU Summer Session '98 alumni On 20th November 1998 our aircraft made soft landing at the Baikonur airport. I was among onboard passengers - officials from Kazakhstan Space, press and diplomats. We all were invited to attend the launch of the International Space Station (ISS) first component (the Russian-made Zarya or Functional Cargo Module FGB) by Proton launch-vehicle at the Baikonur spaceport. Two hours before ISS first module launch we joined the official delegations from NASA, Russian Space Agency (RSA), ESA, Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and NASDA to see the modified facilities of both "Energiya" Corp. and Khrunichev's Proton assembly-and- test building. Mr. Yuri Koptev, Chief of RSA and Mr. Dan Goldin, NASA Administrator actively were drinking russian tea and talking about crucial issues of the International Space Station and the future of Space Exploration. In fact, Cold War is over and the world's top space powers accomplishments are stunning: • The first human flight in space in 1961; • Human space flight initiatives to ascertain if and how long a human could survive in space; • Project Gemini (flights during 1965-1966) to practice space operations, especially rendezvous and docking of spacecraft and extravehicular activity; • Project Apollo (flights during 1968-1972) to explore the Moon; • Space Shuttle's flights (1981 - present); • Satellite programs; • A permanently occupied space station "Mir" (during 1976-1999); • A permanently occupied International Space Station presently underway. We and a few people approached them to learn much more particulars of their talking and to ask them most interesting questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module, IG-01-027
    IG-01-027 AUDIT ACQUISITION OF THE SPACE STATION REPORT PROPULSION MODULE May 21, 2001 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing at (202) 358-1232, or visit www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/issuedaudits.html. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Assistant Inspector General for Auditing Code W NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 NASA Hotline To report fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement contact the NASA Hotline at (800) 424-9183, (800) 535-8134 (TDD), or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/hotline.html#form; or write to the NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, DC 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. Reader Survey Please complete the reader survey at the end of this report or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/audits.html. Acronyms ATV Autonomous Transfer Vehicle FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation FGB Functional Energy Block GAO General Accounting Office ICM Interim Control Module ISS International Space Station NPD NASA Policy Directive NPG NASA Procedures and Guidelines OIG Office of Inspector General OMB Office of Management and Budget OPTS Orbiter Propellant Transfer System SRR Systems Requirements Review USPM United States Propulsion Module USPS United States Propulsion System W May 21, 2001 TO: A/Administrator FROM: W/Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module Report Number IG-01-027 The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) has completed an Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2011 A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2 Chad Lee Davis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons, Other Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Chad Lee, "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/965 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Chad Lee Davis entitled "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aerospace Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Fusées-Sondes De Sud-Aviation
    Les fusées-sondes de Sud-Aviation Jean-Jacques Serra Commission Histoire de la 3AF Origines : Centre national d'études des télécommunications (CNET) • Loi du 4 mai 1944, validée le 29 janvier 1945 • Demandes d'études - ministères (Guerre, Air, Marine), - Radiodiffusion française, - Comité d’action scientifique de la Défense nationale,... • Etudes sur la propagation radioélectrique plusieurs départements (Tubes et hyperfréquence, Transmission, Laboratoire national de radioélectricité) • Recherches sur la troposphère et sur l’ionosphère Programme spatial du CNET lancé en 1957 selon deux directions : • participation au lancement de fusées-sondes pour l’exploration de la haute atmosphère • traitement scientifique des données fournies par les signaux émis par les satellites artificiels Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 2 Contexte : Fusées-sondes existantes Fusées du CASDN pour l'AGI : • Véronique AGI : dérivée des Véronique N et NA (1952-1954) 60 kg à 210 km d'altitude • Monica IV et V : dérivées des Monica I à III (1955-1956) 15 kg à 80 km ou 140 km d'altitude Fusées de l'ONERA utilisées par le CEA : • Daniel : dérivé d'Ardaltex (1957-1959) 15 kg à 125 km d'altitude • Antarès : dérivé de l'engin d'essais de rentrée (1959-1961) 35 kg à 280 km d'altitude Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 3 Définition des besoins du CNET Envoi d'une charge utile de 32 kg à 80 km, 120 km, 400 km et 1000 km d'altitude • fusées commandées à Sud Aviation • unité mobile construite
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System
    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Debris
    IADC-11-04 April 2013 Space Debris IADC Assessment Report for 2010 Issued by the IADC Steering Group Table of Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................... 1 2. IADC Highlights ................................................................ 2 3. Space Debris Activities in the United Nations ................... 4 4. Earth Satellite Population .................................................. 6 5. Satellite Launches, Reentries and Retirements ................ 10 6. Satellite Fragmentations ................................................... 15 7. Collision Avoidance .......................................................... 17 8. Orbital Debris Removal ..................................................... 18 9. Major Meetings Addressing Space Debris ........................ 20 Appendix: Satellite Break-ups, 2000-2010 ............................ 22 IADC Assessment Report for 2010 i Acronyms ADR Active Debris Removal ASI Italian Space Agency CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (France) CNSA China National Space Agency CSA Canadian Space Agency COPUOS Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, United Nations DLR German Aerospace Center ESA European Space Agency GEO Geosynchronous Orbit region (region near 35,786 km altitude where the orbital period of a satellite matches that of the rotation rate of the Earth) IADC Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee ISRO Indian Space Research Organization ISS International Space Station JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency LEO Low
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Another Global History of Science: Making Space for India and China
    BJHS: Themes 1: 115–143, 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/bjt.2016.4 First published online 22 March 2016 Another global history of science: making space for India and China ASIF SIDDIQI* Abstract. Drawing from recent theoretical insights on the circulation of knowledge, this article, grounded in real-world examples, illustrates the importance of ‘the site’ as an analytical heur- istic for revealing processes, movements and connections illegible within either nation-centred histories or comparative national studies. By investigating place instead of project, the study reframes the birth of modern rocket developments in both China and India as fundamentally intertwined within common global networks of science. I investigate four seemingly discon- nected sites in the US, India, China and Ukraine, each separated by politics but connected and embedded in conduits that enabled the flow of expertise during (and in some cases despite) the Cold War. By doing so, it is possible to reconstruct an exemplar of a kind of global history of science, some of which takes place in China, some in India, and some else- where, but all of it connected. There are no discrete beginnings or endings here, merely points of intervention to take stock of processes in action. Each site produces objects and knowledge that contribute to our understanding of the other sites, furthering the overall narra- tive on Chinese and Indian efforts to formalize a ‘national’ space programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Solid Propellant Rockets in India
    EVOLUTION OF SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKETS IN INDIA EVOLUTION OF SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKETS IN INDIA Rajaram Nagappa Former Associate Director Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre Thiruvananthapuram, India Defence Research and Development Organisation Ministry of Defence, New Delhi – 110 011 2014 DRDO MONOGRAPHS/SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS SERIES EVOLUTION OF SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKETS IN INDIA RAJARAM NAGAPPA Series Editors Editor-in-Chief Assoc. Editor-in-Chief Editor Asst. Editor SK Jindal GS Mukherjee Anitha Saravanan Kavita Narwal Editorial Assistant Gunjan Bakshi Cataloguing in Publication Nagappa, Rajaram Evolution of Solid Propellant Rockets in India DRDO Monographs/Special Publications Series. 1. Rocket Fuel 2. Rocket Propellant 3. Solid Propellant I. Title II. Series 621.453:662.3(540) © 2014, Defence Research & Development Organisation, New Delhi – 110 011. ISBN 978-81-86514-51-1 All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the Indian Copyright Act 1957, no part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted, stored in a database or a retrieval system, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. The views expressed in the book are those of the author only. The Editors or the Publisher do not assume responsibility for the statements/opinions expressed by the author. Printing Marketing SK Gupta Rajpal Singh Published by Director, DESIDOC, Metcalfe House, Delhi – 110 054. To the fond memory of my parents Contents Foreword xi Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Launch Report
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Featuring the launch results from the previous quarter and forecasts for the next two quarters. 1st Quarter 1997 U n i t e d S t a t e s D e p a r t me n t o f T r a n sp o r t a t i o n • F e d e r a l A v i a t io n A d m in i st r a t i o n A s so c i a t e A d mi n is t r a t o r f o r C o mm e r c ia l S p a c e T r a n s p o r t a t io n QUARTERLY LAUNCH R EPORT 1 1ST QUARTER 1997 R EPORT Objectives This report summarizes recent and scheduled worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital space launch events. Scheduled launches listed in this report are vehicle/payload combinations that have been identified in open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government documents. Note that such dates are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or more of the following: • Internationally competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market), • Any launches licensed by the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under U.S. Code Title 49, Section 701, Subsection 9 (previously known as the Commercial Space Launch Act), and • Certain European launches of post, telegraph and telecommunications payloads on Ariane vehicles.
    [Show full text]