Evaluation of Recombinant Vaccinia Virus—Measles Vaccines in Infant Rhesus Macaques with Preexisting Measles Antibody

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Recombinant Vaccinia Virus—Measles Vaccines in Infant Rhesus Macaques with Preexisting Measles Antibody Virology 276, 202–213 (2000) doi:10.1006/viro.2000.0564, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Evaluation of Recombinant Vaccinia Virus—Measles Vaccines in Infant Rhesus Macaques with Preexisting Measles Antibody Yong-de Zhu,*,1 Paul Rota,† Linda Wyatt,‡ Azaibi Tamin,† Shmuel Rozenblatt,‡,2 Nicholas Lerche,* Bernard Moss,‡ William Bellini,† and Michael McChesney*,§,3 *The California Regional Primate Research Center and §Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616; †Measles Virus Section, Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; and ‡Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 Received June 20, 2000; returned to author for revision July 28, 2000; accepted August 1, 2000 Immunization of newborn infants with standard measles vaccines is not effective because of the presence of maternal antibody. In this study, newborn rhesus macaques were immunized with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing measles virus hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins, using the replication-competent WR strain of vaccinia virus or the replication- defective MVA strain. The infants were boosted at 2 months and then challenged intranasally with measles virus at 5 months of age. Some of the newborn monkeys received measles immune globulin (MIG) prior to the first immunization, and these infants were compared to additional infants that had maternal measles-neutralizing antibody. In the absence of measles antibody, vaccination with either vector induced neutralizing antibody, cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses to measles virus and protection from systemic measles infection and skin rash. The infants vaccinated with the MVA vector developed lower measles-neutralizing antibody titers than those vaccinated with the WR vector, and they sustained a transient measles viremia upon challenge. Either maternal antibody or passively transferred MIG blocked the humoral response to vaccination with both WR and MVA, and the frequency of positive CTL responses was reduced. Despite this inhibition of vaccine-induced immunity, there was a reduction in peak viral loads and skin rash after measles virus challenge in many of the infants with preexisting measles antibody. Therefore, vaccination using recombinant vectors such as poxviruses may be able to prevent the severe disease that often accompanies measles in infants. © 2000 Academic Press INTRODUCTION and effective, they are neutralized in vivo by maternal antibody (Albrecht et al., 1977). To avoid the interference Measles virus (MV) is a negative-strand RNA virus in of maternal antibody, vaccine is administered at the age the Morbillivirus genus of the family Paramyxoviridae, of 9 months in developing countries and at 12–15 months and it is the causative agent of measles (Griffin and of age in the developed nations. The existence of a Bellini, 1996). Measles is a highly contagious childhood window of susceptibility to infection, between the time of disease characterized by fever and respiratory and sys- decay of maternal antibody below a protective level and temic infection. Measles in the infant is frequently asso- the time of vaccination, contributes to a worldwide child- ciated with serious complications and a high mortality hood measles mortality of 1,000,000 annually, mainly in rate. Measles cases have dropped dramatically world- the developing countries (World Health Organization, wide since the introduction of live, attenuated vaccines 1996). Recently, several reports demonstrated that in- in the 1960s, especially in the developed countries. fants even less than 4 months old can contract measles There were only 100 reported cases in the U.S. in 1999 (Oshitani et al., 1998; Wairagkar et al., 1998). The use of (CDC, 2000), and the interruption of indigenous MV trans- high-titered or inactivated measles vaccines was found mission in the U.S. has been maintained since late 1993 to be unacceptable as a means to overcome the inter- (CDC, 1996; Watson et al., 1998). Although the currently ference of maternal antibody (Aaby et al., 1988, 1993; used live, attenuated measles vaccines are very safe Fulginiti et al., 1967; Halsey, 1993; Kumar et al., 1998; Whittle et al., 1988). The two envelope glycoproteins of MV, the hemagglu- 1 Present address: Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, Seattle, tinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins, are important compo- WA. nents of a measles vaccine. During MV infection, the H 2 Present address: Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. and F proteins elicit both neutralizing antibodies and 3 To whom reprint requests should be addressed at California Re- gional Primate Research Center, University of California-Davis, Davis cellular immunity. Neutralizing antibodies prevent the CA 95616-8542. Fax: (530) 752-2880. E-mail: mbmcchesney@ucdavis. spread of extracellular virus and the cellular immune edu. response plays a critical role in the recovery from infec- 0042-6822/00 $35.00 Copyright © 2000 by Academic Press 202 All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. PREEXISTING ANTIBODY AND MEASLES VACCINATION 203 FIG. 1. Experimental design: vaccination of infant macaques with vaccinia recombinants expressing MV H and F proteins in the presence or absence of MIG or maternal antibody. tion (Burnet, 1968; Good and Zak, 1956). CTL epitopes RESULTS have been mapped to H and F in a human population (Jaye et al., 1998a,b). Thus, the expression of MV H and Experimental design and humoral immune responses F in a recombinant vector like vaccinia virus might be after vaccination able to circumvent the effect of maternal antibody and to As shown in Fig. 1, infant monkeys were divided into immunize the newborn host to H and F antigens. groups that received 0, 3.5, or 7 ml of MIG 48 h prior to Unlike rodents, Asian macaques contract measles vaccination. At 48 h, the geometric mean neutralizing naturally or experimentally, and the clinical signs of antibody titer (GMT) in the blood was 160 in Group 4, measles are similar to those in humans; thus, the which received 3.5 ml MIG (range 80–320), and the GMT monkey is a practical model for the study of measles was 452 in Group 5, which received 7 ml MIG (range pathogenesis and for the development of new measles 320–2560, Table 1). The GMTs achieved after adminis- vaccines (Griffin and Bellini, 1996; Hall et al., 1971; tration of MIG were similar to the GMT of 226 (range Kobune et al., 1996; McChesney et al., 1997; van Bin- 80–2560) measured in eight monkeys with maternally nendijk et al., 1994). Several studies have shown that derived antibody (Table 2). At the same 48 h time point recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the MV H (day of vaccination), sera from six monkeys that received and F proteins can protect against MV infection in both 3.5 or 7 ml MIG were also measured by the conventional mice and monkeys (Drillien et al., 1988; van Binnendijk plaque reduction neutralization method, and a GMT of et al., 1997; Wild et al., 1992). The highly attenuated 2466 was calculated (range 1393–3734). These titers are modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) has been used as a in the range for human newborns with maternal antibody recombinant expression vector and is being devel- (range 32–32,768; Sato et al., 1979). oped as candidate vaccine for humans (Moss et al., The infant monkeys were vaccinated by the intrader- 1996). The aim of the present study was to compare mal (id) route with either WR H&F or WR ␤ gal or by the the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two vac- intranasal (i.n.) and intramuscular (im) routes with MVA cinia viruses, the WR strain and MVA, which express H&F or MVA control. Humoral immune responses to the measles H and F proteins, in infant monkeys in the vaccination were evaluated by virus neutralization and by presence of neutralizing antibody. MV neutralizing an- radio-immunoprecipitation (RIP) for antibodies to the H tibodies and CTL responses were measured after vac- and the nucleoprotein (N). Table 1 shows the titers of cination in the presence or absence of MV immune neutralizing antibody to MV after vaccination with WR ␤ globulin (MIG) or natural maternal antibody. Differing gal or WR H&F in the presence or absence of MIG. Very levels of protection were observed after a respiratory- low levels of MV neutralizing antibody (titers of 10–20) mucosal challenge with wild-type MV. were detected in the two infants of Group 1 vaccinated 204 ZHU ET AL. TABLE 1 Neutralizing Antibody Titers to Measles Virus in Monkeys Immunized with Recombinant Vaccinia (WR) in the Presence or Absence of MIG Reciprocal neutralizing antibody titer in immunized monkeys Group 2 Group 1 (WR ␤gal ϩ Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 (WR ␤gal) MIG 7 ml) (WR H&F ϩ PBS or NMS) (WR H&F ϩ 3.5 ml MIG) (WR H&F ϩ 7 ml MIG) wksa 30998b 31031 30999 31005 30305 30308 30989 31017 30310 30991 30990 31025 30997 31024 30327 30328 30330 30332 0 20 10 320 160 10 20 10 10 20 160 160 160 320 80 320 320 320 320 220Ͻ10 160 80 80 80 80 40 10 160 80 80 80 40 160 160 160 160 810Ͻ10 40 20 160 320 1280 160 40 20 20 160 40 20 80 10 20 10 10 Ͻ10 Ͻ10 20 10 160 640 1280 160 80 10 20 20 10 20 40 20 10 20 20 Ͻ10 Ͻ10 Ͻ10 Ͻ10 640 1280 1280 320 40 Ͻ10 10 20 10 20 10 20 20 40 22c 1280 640 1280 320 5120 1280 2560 1280 2560 640 320 1280 40 1280 640 1280 10 1280 a MIG, PBS, or NMS (normal monkey serum) was inoculated at 48 h prior to immunization at Week 0.
Recommended publications
  • Vaccinia Belongs to a Family of Viruses That Is Closely Related to the Smallpox Virus
    VACCINIA INFECTION What is it? Vaccinia belongs to a family of viruses that is closely related to the smallpox virus. Because of the similarities between the smallpox and vaccinia viruses, the vaccinia virus is used in the smallpox vaccine. When this virus is used as a vaccine, it allows our immune systems to develop immunity against smallpox. The smallpox vaccine does not actually contain smallpox virus and cannot cause smallpox. Vaccination usually prevents smallpox infection for at least ten years. The vaccinia vaccine against smallpox was used to successfully eradicate smallpox from the human population. More recently, this virus has also become of interest due to concerns about smallpox being used as an agent of bioterrorism. How is the virus spread? Vaccinia can be spread by touching the vaccination site before it has fully healed or by touching clothing or bandages that have been contaminated with the live virus during vaccination. In this manner, vaccinia can spread to other parts of the body and to other individuals. It cannot be spread through the air. What are the symptoms of vaccinia? Vaccinia virus symptoms are similar to smallpox, but milder. Vaccinia may cause rash, fever, headache and body aches. In certain individuals, such as those with weak immune systems, the symptoms can be more severe. What are the potential side effects of the vaccinia vaccine for smallpox? Normal reactions are mild and go away without any treatment.These include: Soreness and redness in the arm where the vaccine was given Slightly swollen, sore glands in the armpits Low grade fever One in approximately three people will feel badly enough to miss school, work or recreational activities Trouble sleeping Serious reactions are not very common but can occur in about 1,000 in every 1 million people who are vaccinated for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Risk Assessment Deliberate Release of the GMO MVA
    Environmental Risk Assessment Deliberate release of the GMO MVA-NSmut in a proposed clinical trial Conducted according to the principles described in: S.I. No. 500 of 2003 Genetically Modified Organisms (Deliberate Release) Regulations, 2003, Second Schedule Guideline on Scientific Requirements for the Environmental Risk Assessment of Gene Therapy Medicinal Products EMEA/CHMP/GTWP/125491/2006, 30 May 2008 Background MVA-NSmut is a recombinant virus vaccine derived from the attenuated virus, Modified Vaccinia Ankara. It has a genetic modification leading to the expression of NSmut – which encodes a 1,985 amino acid sequence encompassing NS3 to NS5b of the non-structural region of HCV genotype 1b – the commonest subtype of Hepatitis C virus in Europe. Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a highly attenuated vector that is unable to replicate efficiently in human and most mammalian cells. Recombinant vaccines lead to protein expression that may have the native conformation, glycosylation and post-translational modifications that may occur during natural infection. They may lead to antibody responses as well as cytotoxic responses. These are non-replicating, non-integrating viral vectors. They are not expected to be able to persist in the body or the environment. This means that the vector will only be transiently present in the human body. The mechanism of action of both vectors is the expression of the HCV immunogen NSmut encoded by the viral vectors and stimulation of a humoral and cellular immune response to the expressed protein. Step 1 – Identification of wild type and GMO characteristics which may cause adverse effects MVA-NSmut is the GMO we propose to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinia Viruses As Vectors for Vaccine Antigens Vaccinia Viruses As Vectors for Vaccine Antigens
    Vaccinia Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens Vaccinia Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens Proceedings of the Workshop on Vaccinia Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens, held November 13-14, 1984, in Chevy Chase, Maryland, U. S.A. Editor: GeraldV.Quinnan,Jr.,M.D. Director, Division of Virology Center for Drugs and Biologics Food and Drug Administration Bethesda, Maryland Elsevier New York • Amsterdam. Oxford .... i © 1985 by Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. All rights reserved. This book has been registered with the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. For further information, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Salem, Massachusetts. Published by: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017 Sole distributors outside the United States and Canada: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. P.O. Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, the Netherlands Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Workshop in Vaccinia Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens (1984: Chevy Chase, Md.) Vaccinia viruses as vectors for vaccine antigens. Includes index. I. Vaccines--Congresses. 2. Vaccinia--Congresses. 3. Viralantigens-- Congresses. 4. Smallpox--Congresses. I. Quinnan, Gerald V. 1I. Title. [DNLM: 1. Antigens, Viral--immunology--Congresses. 2. VacciniaVirus-- genetics--congresses. 3. VacciniaVirus--immunology--congresses. 4. Viral Vaccines--immunology--congresses. QW 165.5.P6 W926v 1984] QR189.W674 1984 615'.372 85-12960 ISBN 0-444-00984-1 Manufactured in the United States of America CONTENTS Preface ..... ..... ° . ............... ix Participants .............................. xi Part I: BIOLOGY OF VACCINIA AND OTHER ORTHOPOX VIRUSES I Chairpersons: G. Schild and J. Nakano Vaccinia Virus ...................... 3 D. Baxby Aspects of the Biology of Orthopox Viruses Relevant to the Use of Recombinant Vaccines as Field Vaccines .....
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinia Virus
    APPENDIX 2 Vaccinia Virus • Accidental infection following transfer from the vac- cination site to another site (autoinoculation) or to Disease Agent: another person following intimate contact Likelihood of Secondary Transmission: • Vaccinia virus • Significant following direct contact Disease Agent Characteristics: At-Risk Populations: • Family: Poxviridae; Subfamily: Chordopoxvirinae; • Individuals receiving smallpox (vaccinia) vaccination Genus: Orthopoxvirus • Individuals who come in direct contact with vacci- • Virion morphology and size: Enveloped, biconcave nated persons core with two lateral bodies, brick-shaped to pleo- • Those at risk for more severe complications of infec- morphic virions, ~360 ¥ 270 ¥ 250 nm in size tion include the following: • Nucleic acid: Nonsegmented, linear, covalently ᭺ Immune-compromised persons including preg- closed, double-stranded DNA, 18.9-20.0 kb in length nant women • Physicochemical properties: Virus is inactivated at ᭺ Patients with atopy, especially those with eczema 60°C for 8 minutes, but antigen can withstand 100°C; ᭺ Patients with extensive exfoliative skin disease lyophilized virus maintains potency for 18 months at 4-6°C; virus may be stable when dried onto inanimate Vector and Reservoir Involved: surfaces; susceptible to 1% sodium hypochlorite, • No natural host 2% glutaraldehyde, and formaldehyde; disinfection of hands and environmental contamination with soap Blood Phase: and water are effective • Vaccinia DNA was detected by PCR in the blood in 6.5% of 77 military members from 1 to 3 weeks after Disease Name: smallpox (vaccinia) vaccination that resulted in a major skin reaction. • Progressive vaccinia (vaccinia necrosum or vaccinia • In the absence of complications after immunization, gangrenosum) recently published PCR and culture data suggest that • Generalized vaccinia viremia with current vaccines must be rare 3 weeks • Eczema vaccinatum after vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Synthetic Poxvirus-Based SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.183236; this version posted July 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Development of a Synthetic Poxvirus-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine 2 Flavia Chiuppesi1, Marcela d’Alincourt Salazar1, Heidi Contreras1, Vu H Nguyen1, Joy Martinez1, 3 Soojin Park1, Jenny Nguyen1, Mindy Kha1, Angelina Iniguez1, Qiao Zhou1, Teodora Kaltcheva1, 4 Roman Levytskyy1, Nancy D Ebelt2, Tae Hyuk Kang3, Xiwei Wu3, Thomas Rogers4, Edwin R 5 Manuel2, Yuriy Shostak5, Don J Diamond1*, Felix Wussow1* 6 1Department of Hematology and Transplant Center, City of Hope National Medical Center, 7 Duarte CA 91010, USA; 2Department of Immuno-Oncology and 3Genomic core facility, 8 Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte CA 91010, USA; 4University of 9 California San Diego, School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public 10 Health, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Scripps Research, Department of Immunology and 11 Microbiology, 10550 N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037; 5Research Business Development, 12 City of Hope, Duarte CA 91010, USA 13 *co-corresponding and co-senior authors 14 One sentence summary: Chiuppesi et al. demonstrate the use of a uniquely designed and fully 15 synthetic poxvirus-based vaccine platform to rapidly develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate 16 enabling stimulation of potent humoral and cellular immune responses to multiple antigens.
    [Show full text]
  • 210129 Geovax GV-MVA-VLP™ White Paper
    GEOVAX MVA-VLP AND MVA PLATFORMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GeoVax utilizes Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) as a recombinant viral vector to express vaccine antigens of interest in a format suitable for global use. Our MVA-Virus-Like Particle (GV-MVA-VLP™) platform combines the outstanding safety of MVA with the enhanced immunogenicity of vaccine antigens displayed on the surface of VLPs. The VLPs are generated in vivo within the vaccinated patients. Research in animal models has demonstrated vaccines based on the MVA-VLP platform to be safe, immunogenic and to induce immunity capable of protecting animals against a variety of disease-causing agents. For Ebola, Lassa Fever and Zika virus, single inoculations of GeoVax MVA-VLP based vaccines fully protected animals against lethal viral challenges. The MVA-VLP vaccines induce both humoral (antibody) and cellular (T-cell) immune responses characterized by high magnitude and durability. Our GOVX-B11 vaccine for HIV has demonstrated outstanding safety and immunogenicity in multiple clinical trials and is currently being tested in clinical trials as a component in preventive vaccine and as a therapeutic, working toward a “functional cure.” INTRODUCTION MVA is a highly attenuated strain of the vaccinia virus (VV) that was developed specifically for use in humans as a vaccine against smallpox. This viral vaccine vector is unable to replicate in human cells which imparts exceptional vaccine safety, while readily replicating in cells of avian origin, such as duck and chicken cell lines, facilitating efficient, high volume manufacturing. MVA is approved and licensed as a smallpox vaccine in Europe and the USA and is the preferred product for individuals that may not readily tolerate the VV vaccine, such as the elderly, immune compromised and those with various co-morbidities.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Papillomavirus and HPV Vaccines: a Review
    Human papillomavirus and HPV vaccines: a review FT Cutts,a S Franceschi,b S Goldie,c X Castellsague,d S de Sanjose,d G Garnett,e WJ Edmunds,f P Claeys,g KL Goldenthal,h DM Harper i & L Markowitz j Abstract Cervical cancer, the most common cancer affecting women in developing countries, is caused by persistent infection with “high-risk” genotypes of human papillomaviruses (HPV). The most common oncogenic HPV genotypes are 16 and 18, causing approximately 70% of all cervical cancers. Types 6 and 11 do not contribute to the incidence of high-grade dysplasias (precancerous lesions) or cervical cancer, but do cause laryngeal papillomas and most genital warts. HPV is highly transmissible, with peak incidence soon after the onset of sexual activity. A quadrivalent (types 6, 11, 16 and 18) HPV vaccine has recently been licensed in several countries following the determination that it has an acceptable benefit/risk profile. In large phase III trials, the vaccine prevented 100% of moderate and severe precancerous cervical lesions associated with types 16 or 18 among women with no previous infection with these types. A bivalent (types 16 and 18) vaccine has also undergone extensive evaluation and been licensed in at least one country. Both vaccines are prepared from non-infectious, DNA-free virus-like particles produced by recombinant technology and combined with an adjuvant. With three doses administered, they induce high levels of serum antibodies in virtually all vaccinated individuals. In women who have no evidence of past or current infection with the HPV genotypes in the vaccine, both vaccines show > 90% protection against persistent HPV infection for up to 5 years after vaccination, which is the longest reported follow-up so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Here, There, and Everywhere: the Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses
    viruses Review Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses Natalia Ingrid Oliveira Silva, Jaqueline Silva de Oliveira, Erna Geessien Kroon , Giliane de Souza Trindade and Betânia Paiva Drumond * Laboratório de Vírus, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil; [email protected] (N.I.O.S.); [email protected] (J.S.d.O.); [email protected] (E.G.K.); [email protected] (G.d.S.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The global emergence of zoonotic viruses, including poxviruses, poses one of the greatest threats to human and animal health. Forty years after the eradication of smallpox, emerging zoonotic orthopoxviruses, such as monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses continue to infect humans as well as wild and domestic animals. Currently, the geographical distribution of poxviruses in a broad range of hosts worldwide raises concerns regarding the possibility of outbreaks or viral dissemination to new geographical regions. Here, we review the global host ranges and current epidemiological understanding of zoonotic orthopoxviruses while focusing on orthopoxviruses with epidemic potential, including monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses. Keywords: Orthopoxvirus; Poxviridae; zoonosis; Monkeypox virus; Cowpox virus; Vaccinia virus; host range; wild and domestic animals; emergent viruses; outbreak Citation: Silva, N.I.O.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Kroon, E.G.; Trindade, G.d.S.; Drumond, B.P. Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range 1. Poxvirus and Emerging Diseases and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic diseases, defined as diseases or infections that are naturally transmissible Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses. Viruses from vertebrate animals to humans, represent a significant threat to global health [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinia Virus and Viral Vectors
    Vaccinia Virus and Viral Vectors Background Vaccinia virus is a member of the family Poxviridae, which are enveloped viruses with double stranded DNA genomes. These viruses replicate in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells because they do not require host replication machinery found in the nucleus. This trait allows poxviruses to replicate in enucleated cells. Vaccinia virus has a large genome, which allows for large inserts (up to 25 kb of foreign DNA) and a high level of DNA expression from prokaryotes or eukaryotes due to being regulated by a strong poxviral promoter. The foreign genes are stably inserted into the viral genome, allowing for efficient replication and expression including proper post translational modification in the infected cell. While transduction with the viral vector will be transient, there will be high levels of expression of the transgene. Vaccinia virus is a human pathogen, and while it is the strain of poxvirus used for the small pox vaccine, it can cause flu-like symptoms in healthy individuals and more serious complications in immunocompromised individuals. Vaccinia virus is transmittable to others if contact with the vaccination site or area of infection occurs. Recombinant vaccines that utilize highly attenuated strains such as Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) and NYVAC have been created to treat diseases. These attenuated strains are replication deficient and are recommended for use as vectors to replace wild type vaccinia virus. The primary safety concern with vaccinia viral vectors is the transgene. Examples of high risk transgenes are those that encode a toxin or are immunomodulatory. Also, when replication deficient strains are used in the presence of other orthopox viruses, there is a possibility of recombination to create replication competent viral vectors with the genes of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary
    510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY A. 510(k) Number: K181205 B. Purpose for Submission: Modification of device C. Measurand: Non-variola Orthopoxvirus DNA target sequence D. Type of Test: In vitro molecular diagnostic test E. Applicant: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention F. Proprietary and Established Names: Non-variola Orthopoxvirus Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set G. Regulatory Information: 1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 866.3315: Nucleic acid based reagents for detection of non-variola orthopoxviruses 2. Classification: Class II (Special Controls) 3. Product code: PBK 4. Panel: Microbiology (83) 1 H. Intended Use: 1. Intended use(s): The Non-variola Orthopoxvirus Real-time PCR Primer and Probe Set is intended for the in vitro qualitative presumptive detection of non-variola Orthopoxvirus DNA extracted from human pustular or vesicular rash specimens and viral cell culture lysates submitted to a Laboratory Response Network (LRN) reference laboratory. The assay detects non- variola Orthopoxvirus DNA, including Vaccinia, Cowpox, Monkeypox and Ectromelia viruses at varying concentrations. This assay does not differentiate Vaccinia virus or Monkeypox virus from other Orthopoxviruses detected by this assay and does not detect Variola virus. Refer to the CDC algorithm, Acute, Generalized Vesicular or Pustular Rash Illness Testing Protocol in the United States for recommended testing and evaluation algorithms for patients presenting with acute, generalized pustular or vesicular rash illness. Results of this assay are for the presumptive identification of non-variola Orthopoxvirus DNA. These results must be used in conjunction with other diagnostic assays and clinical observations to diagnose Orthopoxvirus infection. The assay should only be used to test specimens with low/moderate risk of smallpox.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Protective Immune Response to Administration of a LIVP-GFP Live Attenuated Vaccinia Virus to Mice
    pathogens Article Enhancing the Protective Immune Response to Administration of a LIVP-GFP Live Attenuated Vaccinia Virus to Mice Sergei N. Shchelkunov *, Stanislav N. Yakubitskiy, Kseniya A. Titova, Stepan A. Pyankov and Alexander A. Sergeev State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR, Rospotrebnadzor, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk 630559, Russia; [email protected] (S.N.Y.); [email protected] (K.A.T.); [email protected] (S.A.P.); [email protected] (A.A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Following the WHO announcement of smallpox eradication, discontinuation of smallpox vaccination with vaccinia virus (VACV) was recommended. However, interest in VACV was soon renewed due to the opportunity of genetic engineering of the viral genome by directed insertion of foreign genes or introduction of mutations or deletions into selected viral genes. This genomic technology enabled production of stable attenuated VACV strains producing antigens of various infectious agents. Due to an increasing threat of human orthopoxvirus re-emergence, the development of safe highly immunogenic live orthopoxvirus vaccines using genetic engineering methods has been the challenge in recent years. In this study, we investigated an attenuated VACV LIVP-GFP (TK-) strain having an insertion of the green fluorescent protein gene into the viral thymidine kinase gene, which was generated on the basis of the LIVP (Lister-Institute for Viral Preparations) strain used in Citation: Shchelkunov, S.N.; Russia as the first generation smallpox vaccine. We studied the effect of A34R gene modification Yakubitskiy, S.N.; Titova, K.A.; and A35R gene deletion on the immunogenic and protective properties of the LIVP-GFP strain.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of a Modified Vaccinia Ankara-NP+M1 Vaccine Combined with QIV in People Aged 65 and Older:A Randomised Contr
    Article Efficacy and Safety of a Modified Vaccinia Ankara-NP+M1 Vaccine Combined with QIV in People Aged 65 and Older: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial (INVICTUS) Chris Butler 1 , Chris Ellis 2, Pedro M. Folegatti 3 , Hannah Swayze 1, Julie Allen 1, Louise Bussey 2, Duncan Bellamy 3 , Alison Lawrie 3, Elizabeth Eagling-Vose 2, Ly-Mee Yu 1, Milensu Shanyinde 1, Catherine Mair 3, Amy Flaxman 3 , Katie Ewer 3 , Sarah Gilbert 3, Thomas G. Evans 2,* and on behalf of the INVICTUS Investigators † 1 Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (L.-M.Y.); [email protected] (M.S.) 2 Vaccitech Ltd., Oxford OX4 4GE, UK; [email protected] (C.E.); [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (E.E.-V.) 3 Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK; [email protected] (P.M.F.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (C.M.); amy.fl[email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (K.E.); [email protected] (S.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Citation: Butler, C.; Ellis, C.; † Membership is provided in the acknowledgments. Folegatti, P.M.; Swayze, H.; Allen, J.; Bussey, L.; Bellamy, D.; Lawrie, A.; Abstract: Background: Pre-existing T cell responses to influenza have been correlated with improved Eagling-Vose, E.; Yu, L.-M.; et al.
    [Show full text]