DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Kaufman Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Kaufman Report SEARCHING FOR JUSTICE AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF NOVA SCOTIA’S RESPONSE TO REPORTS OF INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE Volume 1 The Honourable Fred Kaufman, C.M., Q.C., D.C.L. January 2002 Searching for Justice: An Independent Review of Nova Scotia’s Response to Reports of Institutional Abuse © Province of Nova Scotia 2002 ISBN 0-88871-714-8 Printed in Canada This Report is available on the Internet at www.gov.ns.ca/just. Acknowledgements No review of this scope and nature can be accomplished without the input, help and dedication of a devoted group of people. I was fortunate to have such a group. Duncan R. Beveridge, Q.C., a seasoned and highly-respected Halifax counsel, accepted my invitation to be Senior Counsel to the Review. Duncan and I had worked together before, and I knew that any task entrusted to him would be carried out with skill, delicacy, and total thoroughness, and so it was. Mark J. Sandler, a prominent Toronto barrister, became my Senior Policy Advisor. As was the case with Duncan, this was not the first time that Mark and I had joined forces in a major undertaking, and I knew that he would approach the task ahead with exquisite skill, dedication and his usual enthusiasm. When I first approached him, he was in the final stages of acting as counsel to the Honourable Sydney L. Robins, who chaired a review “to identify and prevent sexual misconduct in Ontario Schools.” Mark’s experience in that position was of great value to this review, and this is reflected in the Report. Christopher J. Sherrin, one of Mark’s associates, was a tower of strength in the final stages of the review. He worked long and hard on successive drafts and I appreciate his dedication. Andrea Tuck-Jackson, Mark’s partner, took time off her heavy schedule to read the final draft and make many helpful suggestions. Her input makes this a better document. Seetal Sunga, an Ontario lawyer then in Halifax to complete a Master’s degree in law at Dalhousie University, acted as Director of Research. She was assisted by Drago Vidovic, also a graduate of the Dalhousie Master of Law program. Their contribution was of great value to me, my counsel and my senior policy advisor. Faizal R. Mirza, then a student-at-law at Osgoode Hall in Toronto, also assisted in assembling and summarizing some of the documentation. This was a small but highly effective group, and I thank them for their assistance, loyalty and devotion. It was truly a team effort, but the ultimate responsibility is, of course, mine. To fulfill my mandate, my staff or I met with over 100 individuals. These included persons involved in the design and implementation of the Government’s response, Ministers and Deputy Ministers, internal investigators and their staff, police officers, therapists, Dr. Elsie Blake of the Family Services Association, file assessors, administrators, former Chief Justice Stratton and Ms. Viki Samuels-Stewart. Written feedback was also received from a number of file reviewers. I am indebted to them all for their cooperation throughout. Voluminous documentation had to be obtained, particularly from the Government. Nova Scotia officials were forthcoming and helpful, and no request for information - and there were many - went unanswered. I am also grateful for the information provided to this review by officials in Newfoundland, New Brunswick, Ontario, British Columbia, and with the Federal Government and Law Commission of Canada. I wish to especially acknowledge the former and current employees, as well as former residents of the youth facilities, with whom I met. I know that many found it painful to discuss the intimate details of their lives with me and my staff, and I am particularly grateful to them for having agreed to do so. Their contribution was extremely important to the content of this Report. A number of counsel met with me or my staff and prepared written submissions for my assistance on behalf of the former residents, former and current employees, the Nova Scotia Government Employees Union and the Department of Justice. They were unfailingly courteous and of assistance to me in my task. Last, but by no means least, I thank my wife Donna, whose love, encouragement and understanding give me much comfort and strength. Table of Contents Chapter I: Scope and Nature of the Review 1. THE MANDATE ................................................ 2 2. “APPROPRIATE, FAIR AND REASONABLE” ....................... 4 3. LIMITATIONS OF MANDATE .................................... 5 4. USE OF TERMINOLOGY ........................................ 7 5. PRIVACY ISSUES .............................................. 8 6. LEGAL PRIVILEGE ............................................. 9 7. EFFECTS OF ABUSE ............................................ 9 8. THE PROCESS ................................................ 12 9. FUNDING .................................................... 16 10. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .................................. 17 Chapter II: Historical Overview 1. HISTORY OF RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN NOVA SCOTIA ....... 18 (a) Shelburne Youth Centre ....................................... 18 (b) Nova Scotia School for Girls ................................... 20 (c) Nova Scotia Youth Training Centre .............................. 21 2. REPORTED ABUSE PRIOR TO 1994 .............................. 21 (a) Policies ................................................... 22 (b) Police Investigations ......................................... 23 (i) Shelburne School for Boys ............................... 23 (ii) Nova Scotia School for Girls ............................. 29 Chapter III: Formulation of The Government Response 1. EVENTS LEADING TO THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE ............. 33 2. FORMULATION OF THE THREE-PRONGED RESPONSE ............. 38 3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE ............. 41 4. ANALYSIS ................................................... 46 Chapter IV: The Samuels-Stewart Audit 1. THE AUDIT’S MANDATE ....................................... 51 2. CONTENTS OF THE REPORT ................................... 52 (a) Introduction ................................................ 52 (b) Process and Participation ...................................... 52 (c) The Auditor’s Findings ........................................ 55 (i) An understanding of abuse ............................... 55 (ii) Whether young offenders currently in custody are protected from abuse ................................................. 56 (iii) Whether young offenders currently in custody are being abused ................................................. 58 (d) Conclusions and Recommendations of the Report ................... 60 3. THE ACCOMPANYING LETTER ................................. 61 4. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO AUDIT REPORT ................... 63 5. THE OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE ................................... 64 6. INTERVIEW WITH MS. SAMUELS-STEWART ..................... 66 7. ANALYSIS ................................................... 67 Chapter V: The Stratton Report 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 83 2. CONDUCT OF THE INVESTIGATION ............................. 84 3. SHELBURNE SCHOOL FOR BOYS ............................... 88 4. SYDNEY CHILDREN’S TRAINING CENTRE ....................... 92 5. NOVA SCOTIA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ............................. 93 6. DARTMOUTH CHILDREN’S TRAINING CENTRE ................... 95 7. NOVA SCOTIA YOUTH TRAINING CENTRE ....................... 97 8. THE LALO CASE .............................................. 98 9. ANALYSIS .................................................. 100 Chapter VI: The Origin of the Compensation Program 1. BACKGROUND .............................................. 107 2. THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF JULY 20, 1995 ........................ 112 3. ANALYSIS .................................................. 115 4. NEGOTIATIONS ............................................. 117 5. ANALYSIS .................................................. 130 Chapter VII: The Memorandum of Understanding 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 139 2. ELIGIBILITY ................................................ 140 3. COMPENSATION CATEGORIES ................................ 140 4. PROCESS ................................................... 142 5. FILE REVIEW ............................................... 143 6. COUNSELLING AND OTHER BENEFITS ......................... 145 7. LEGAL FEES ................................................ 145 8. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS .................................... 146 9. ANALYSIS .................................................. 146 Chapter VIII: The Commencement of Investigations 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 149 2. FORMATION OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT ......... 149 3. OPERATION OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT .......... 152 4. ANALYSIS .................................................. 159 Chapter IX: The Early Days 1. PREPARATIONS FOR THE MOU ................................ 161 2. THE EARLY OPERATION OF THE MOU ......................... 163 3. EVENTS LEADING TO THE SUSPENSION OF THE PROGRAM ...... 171 4. AUDIT OF CLAIM FILES ...................................... 177 5. ANALYSIS .................................................. 184 Chapter X: Events During the Suspension 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 189 2. REACTION TO THE SUSPENSION .............................. 190 3. DIFFICULTIES IDENTIFIED BY THE ASSESSORS ................. 192 4. MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1996 ............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sexual Abuse of the Vulnerable by Catholic Clergy Thomas P
    Sexual Abuse of the Vulnerable by Catholic Clergy Thomas P. Doyle, J.C.D., C.A.D.C. exual abuse of the vulnerable by Catholic clergy (deacons, priests and bishops) was a little known phenomenon until the mid-eighties. Widespread publicity sur- S rounding a case from a diocese in Louisiana in 1984 began a socio-historical process that would reveal one of the Church’s must shameful secrets, the widespread, systemic sexual violation of children, young adolescents and vulnerable adults by men who hold one of the most trusted positions in our society (cf. Berry, 1992). The steady stream of reports was not obvious was the sexual abuse itself. This Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, contained limited to the southern United States. It was was especially shocking and scandalous an explicit condemnation of sex between soon apparent that this was a grave situa- because the perpetrators were priests and adult males and young boys. There were no tion for the Catholic Church throughout the in some cases, bishops. For many it was clergy as such at that time nor were United States. Although the Vatican at first difficult, if not impossible, to resolve the bishops and priests, as they are now claimed this was an American problem, the contradiction between the widespread ins- known, in a separate social and theological steady stream of revelations quickly spread tances of one of society’s most despicable class. The first legislation proscribing what to other English speaking countries. crimes and the stunning revelation that the later became known as pederasty was pas- Reports in other countries soon confirmed perpetrators were front-line leaders of the sed by a group of bishops at the Synod of what insightful observers predicted: it was largest and oldest Christian denomination, Elvira in southern Spain in 309 AD.
    [Show full text]
  • Clergy Sexual Abuse: Annotated Bibliography of Conceptual and Practical Resources
    Clergy Sexual Abuse: Annotated Bibliography of Conceptual and Practical Resources. Preface The phenomenon of sexual abuse as committed by persons in fiduciary relationships is widespread among helping professions and is international in scope. This bibliography is oriented to several specific contexts in which that phenomenon occurs. The first context is the religious community, specifically Christian churches, and particularly in the U.S. This is the context of occurrence that I best know and understand. The second context for the phenomenon is the professional role of clergy, a religious vocation and culture of which I am a part. While the preponderance of sources cited in this bibliography reflect those two settings, the intent is to be as comprehensive as possible about sexual boundary violations within the religious community. Many of the books included in this bibliography were obtained through interlibrary loan services that are available at both U.S. public and academic libraries. Many of the articles that are listed were obtained through academic libraries. Daily newspaper media sources are generally excluded from this bibliography for practical reasons due to the large quantity, lack of access, and concerns about accuracy and completeness. In most instances, author descriptions and affiliations refer to status at time of publication. In the absence of a subject or name index for this bibliography, the Internet user may trace key words in this PDF format through the standard find or search feature that is available as a pull-down menu option on the user’s computer. The availability of this document on the Internet is provided by AdvocateWeb, a nonprofit corporation that serves an international community and performs an exceptional service for those who care about this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Could We Build Justice Safety Centers?
    (2020) 1:2 INNOCENCE AND PREVENTION: SAFETY CENTERS 253 Innocence and Prevention: Could We Build Justice Safety Centers? James Doyle Of Counsel: Bassil & Budreau, LLP Boston, Massachusetts U.S.A. Some contemporary writers argue that wrongful convictions represent system failures in a complex criminal justice system. Currently explorations are underway into whether pursuit of non-blaming, all-stakeholders, forward-looking “sentinel event” reviews focused on lowering risk rather than laying blame can improve safety from wrongful convictions. This article reviews the underlying theory of safety-based practices and sketches one model of how work on preventing wrongful convictions might be institutionalized: made a part of a new culture of continuous improvement that lowers the risk of future wrongful convictions and offers a degree of restorative justice to the victims of errors. I. Using Safety’s Wider Lens II. Reviewing the Event, Not the Performance III. A Place to Learn: Creating the Space for Stories IV. Marshaling, Interrogating, Improving, and Disseminating Data V. A Model to Amend (Or Reject) Innocence work naturally prioritizes a tight, reactive focus—a concentration on apprehending errors and rescuing individual clients. But the people closest to the suffering of the justice system’s victims are also best placed to appreciate the restorative value of honoring their exonerated clients’ perspectives, recognizing the harms done to the original crime’s victims, and preventing new tragedies. Like it or not, innocence workers and exonerated
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting for the Future
    Fighting for the Future Adult Survivors Work to Protect Children & End the Culture of Clergy Sexual Abuse An NGO Report The Holy See . The Convention on the Rights of the Child . The Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography February 2013 Submitted by The Center for Constitutional Rights a Member of the International Federation for Human Rights on behalf of The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY, U.S.A. 10012 Tel. +1 (212) 614-6431 ▪ Fax +1 (212) 614-6499 [email protected] ▪ www.ccrjustice.org Cover Photos: The photos on the Report: This report was prepared by cover are of members of the Survivors Katherine Gallagher and Pam Spees, Network of Those Abused by Priests at Senior Staff Attorneys at the Center the age that they were sexually for Constitutional Rights, with the abused. They have consented to the research assistance of Rebecca Landy use of their photos to help raise and Ellyse Borghi and Aliya Hussain. awareness and call attention to this crisis. Table of Contents Foreword I. General Considerations: Overview 1 The Policies and Practices of the Holy See Helped to Perpetuate the Violations 3 The Acts at Issue: Torture, Rape and Other Forms of Sexual Violence 4 Violations of Principles Enshrined in the CRC and OPSC 5 II. Legal Status and Structure of the Holy See and Implications for Fulfillment of Its Obligations Under the CRC and OPSC 8 Privileging Canon Law and Procedures and Lack of Cooperation with Civil Authorities 10 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Say Canadian Bishops Responding to US Abuse Crisis
    Catholics are ‘rightly ashamed’, say Canadian bishops responding to U.S. abuse crisis Canada’s Catholic bishops have joined their American counterparts in expressing heartbreak and sorrow over the unfolding clerical abuse crisis south of the border. “Catholics across our country are rightly ashamed and saddened regarding the findings of the Pennsylvania Investigating Grand Jury,” said an Aug. 20 statement from the executive committee of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB). Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops “With Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, we reiterate the profound sadness that we as Bishops feel each time we learn about the harm caused as a result of abuse by Church leaders of any rank.” The grand jury reported on decades of clerical sexual abuse involving more than 1,000 minors and about 300 predator priests as well as on the bishops who covered up their crimes. “The Bishops of Canada treat with great seriousness instances of sexual abuse of minors and inappropriate conduct on the part of all pastoral workers – be they fellow Bishops, other clergy, consecrated persons or laity,” the CCCB statement said. “National guidelines for the protection of minors have been in place in Canada since 1992, which dioceses and eparchies across the country have applied in their local policies and protocols.” Canada’s Catholic bishops developed protocols long before their American counterparts because the clerical sexual abuse crisis hit Canada in the late 1980s with the revelations of abuse by Irish Catholic Brothers at Mount Cashel Orphanage, followed by the Winter Commission set up by the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Convictions/Miscarriages of Justice, Law As a System, and the Story of the Little Girl
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF BUSINESS, LAW AND ART Wrongful Convictions/Miscarriages of Justice, Law as a System, and the story of the Little Girl by Ebenezer Laryea Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2016 1 Academic Thesis: Declaration Of Authorship I, EBENEZER NINII LARYEA declare that this thesis and the work presented in it are my own and has been generated by me as the result of my own original research. Title of thesis: WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS/MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE, LAW AS A SYSTEM, AND THE STORY OF THE LITTLE GIRL …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… I confirm that: 1. This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University; 2. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report
    , 2013 © Megan Peterson Shadow Report Prepared for 52nd Session of the UN Committee Against Torture in Connection with its Review of the Holy See Submitted by the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests April 2014 Cover Art Copyright Megan Peterson, 2013. All rights reserved. Megan Peterson is an artist and survivor of sexual violence by a priest. She is also a complainant in the effort to hold Vatican officials accountable for rape and sexual violence as crimes against humanity in the International Criminal Court and a member of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. Table of Contents Submitting Organizations iii List of Key Commissions, Inquiries and Investigations iv-v Introduction 1 I. The Committee Has Long Recognized Rape and Sexual Violence as Forms of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment and Punishment 4 II. Numerous Commissions and Inquiries Around the World Have Established the Existence of Widespread Rape and Sexual Violence in the Church 6 III. Rape and Sexual Violence Have Resulted in Severe Pain and Suffering, Both Physical and Mental, and Have Amounted to Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment 8 A. Suicides 10 B. Lasting Physical, Mental, Psychological and Emotional Harm 11 IV. The Holy See’s Policies and Practices Have Enabled, and Continue to Enable, the Widespread Rape and Sexual Violence and Result in Severe Physical and Mental Harm 13 A. Legal Status of the Holy See and Implications for Fulfillment of its Obligations under the Convention 13 B. Structure of the Church and Chain of Command 14 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Licentiousness" in Religious Organizations and Why It Is Not Protected Under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 18 (2009-2010) Issue 4 Symposium: Families, Fundamentalism, Article 7 & the First Amendment May 2010 The "Licentiousness" in Religious Organizations and Why it is Not Protected under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions Marci A. Hamilton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Repository Citation Marci A. Hamilton, The "Licentiousness" in Religious Organizations and Why it is Not Protected under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 953 (2010), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol18/iss4/7 Copyright c 2010 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj THE “LICENTIOUSNESS” IN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS AND WHY IT IS NOT PROTECTED UNDER RELIGIOUS LIBERTY CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS Marci A. Hamilton* There is no doubt that the sexual abuse of children occurs within religious organizations and that these organizations too often operate to perpetuate cycles of abuse. There was a time when such a statement was counter-intuitive, but it is now merely a statement of fact. One difficult question to answer is how the law has failed to protect the vulnerable in religious organizations. Misguided reliance on the First Amendment is partly to blame. There are many reasons why the law has been insufficient to protect children in religious organizations, some more obvious
    [Show full text]
  • The “Licentiousness” in Religious Organizations and Why It Is Not Protected Under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions
    THE “LICENTIOUSNESS” IN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS AND WHY IT IS NOT PROTECTED UNDER RELIGIOUS LIBERTY CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS Marci A. Hamilton* There is no doubt that the sexual abuse of children occurs within religious organizations and that these organizations too often operate to perpetuate cycles of abuse. There was a time when such a statement was counter-intuitive, but it is now merely a statement of fact. One difficult question to answer is how the law has failed to protect the vulnerable in religious organizations. Misguided reliance on the First Amendment is partly to blame. There are many reasons why the law has been insufficient to protect children in religious organizations, some more obvious than others. First, children have not had the legal capacity until relatively recently to challenge their abusers.1 Second, the statutes of limitations for child sex abuse have been constructed in a way to make it virtually impossible for the vast majority of victims to get to a prosecutor and/or civil courts before their claims have expired.2 Third, as a society, we have tended to adopt a “romantic attitude” and trust most religious organizations, which gave them latitude to hide abuse.3 That changed in 2002 when the Boston Globe revealed that the Boston Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church had covered up horrendous abuse by serial pedophiles, including Father Paul Shanley and Father John Geoghan.4 * Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University. Thanks to the William and Mary Institute of Bill of Rights Law for making this paper possible and the participants of their symposium “Families, Fundamentalism, & the First Amendment” for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA and the Criminal Justice System: Consensus and Debate
    877 DNA and the Criminal Justice System: Consensus and Debate David Lazer and Michelle N. Meyer In the last decade, DNA analysis has become a mainstay of the criminal justice system—the gold standard for identification. Following Breyer's and Jasanoff's discussions of the role of deliberation in the integration of technology and society, this concluding chapter examines where we, as a society, have reached a consensus—or should—on the use of DNA in the justice system, and also points to the unsettled areas of debate in which there remains room for reasonable disagreement. As Imwinkelried discusses in his chapter, DNA technology has been rapidly and fairly easily integrated into the courtroom; its integration into the pre- and post-trial areas has been slower and more complex. Nevertheless, some broad areas of agreement exist, or should exist, in these areas, including: that some level of post-conviction relief is warranted; and that some form of DNA databases are effective and appropriate investigatory tools. Beyond that broad 878 consensus, however, exists a sometimes vociferous debate about how extensive post-conviction and database programs should be, and the institutions and rules that should govern them. Below we first summarize the areas of consensus, and then analyze the remaining areas of disagreement. We conclude by discussing deeper questions at the nexus of law, science and society. Areas of consensus There are two broad areas of consensus. First, that DNA changes the meaning of time in the justice system. From this principle follow a number of subsidiary points: that evidence must be preserved; that there should be statutory criteria for post-conviction access and review of evidence; and that statutes of limitation should be increased or abolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Ie, Forensic Science
    The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Allard Faculty Publications 2014 Admissibility Compared: The Reception of Incriminating Expert Evidence (i.e., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions Gary Edmond Emma Cunliffe Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia, [email protected] Simon A. Cole Andrew J. Roberts Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/fac_pubs Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Citation Details Gary Edmond et al, "Admissibility Compared: The Reception of Incriminating Expert Evidence (i.e., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions (2014) 3 U Den Crim L Rev 31. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Allard Faculty Publications at Allard Research Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Allard Research Commons. ADMISSIBILITY COMPARED: THE RECEPTION OF INCRIMINATING EXPERT EVIDENCE (I.E., FORENSIC SCIENCE) IN FOUR ADVERSARIAL JURISDICTIONS Gary Edmond,* Simon Cole,† Emma Cunliffe,‡ and Andrew Roberts§ INTRODUCTION The single most important observation about judicial [gate-keeping] of forensic science is that most judges under most circumstances admit most forensic science. There is almost no expert testimony so threadbare that it will not be admitted if it comes to a criminal proceeding under the banner of forensic science. The applicable legal test offers little assurance. The maverick who is a field unto him- or herself has repeatedly been readily admitted under Frye, and the complete absence of foundational research has not prevented such admission in Daubert jurisdictions.1 There is an epistemic crisis in many areas of forensic science.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report
    © Megan Peterson, 2013 Peterson, © Megan Shadow Report Prepared for 52nd Session of the UN Committee Against Torture in Connection with its Review of the Holy See Submitted by the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests April 2014 Cover Art Copyright Megan Peterson, 2013. All rights reserved. Megan Peterson is an artist and survivor of sexual violence by a priest. She is also a complainant in the effort to hold Vatican officials accountable for rape and sexual violence as crimes against humanity in the International Criminal Court and a member of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. Table of Contents Submitting Organizations iii List of Key Commissions, Inquiries and Investigations iv-v Introduction 1 I. The Committee Has Long Recognized Rape and Sexual Violence as Forms of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment and Punishment 4 II. Numerous Commissions and Inquiries Around the World Have Established the Existence of Widespread Rape and Sexual Violence in the Church 6 III. Rape and Sexual Violence Have Resulted in Severe Pain and Suffering, Both Physical and Mental, and Have Amounted to Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment 8 A. Suicides 10 B. Lasting Physical, Mental, Psychological and Emotional Harm 11 IV. The Holy See’s Policies and Practices Have Enabled, and Continue to Enable, the Widespread Rape and Sexual Violence and Result in Severe Physical and Mental Harm 13 A. Legal Status of the Holy See and Implications for Fulfillment of its Obligations under the Convention 13 B. Structure of the Church and Chain of Command 14 C.
    [Show full text]