“He Loves the Immigrant”: Deuteronomy's Theological and Social Vision for the רג the Aim of This Dissertation Is to Pres

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“He Loves the Immigrant”: Deuteronomy's Theological and Social Vision for the רג the Aim of This Dissertation Is to Pres ABSTRACT גרגרגר He Loves the Immigrant”: Deuteronomy’s Theological and Social Vision for the“ The aim of this dissertation is to present a more nuanced and comprehensive immigrant” in the book of Deuteronomy (D), which“ גר understanding of the noun occurrences than any other Old Testament (OT) book. After making a גר contains more case for the translation “immigrant” in most biblical contexts, I then trace predominant approaches to interpreting this noun in the OT: lexico-syntagmatic, sociological, sociohistorical referential, theological and related methods. I seek to employ a variegated approach, one that intersects textual investigation, sociological implications, and other figure and legislation. The primary questions that גר dynamics in order to understand D’s in a given biblical corpus? How do גר have preoccupied researchers are: who is the To what ? גר biblical texts, especially Pentateuchal laws, expect Israelites to treat the into the Israelite community? A history גר extent do biblical texts attempt to integrate the of research demonstrates that scholars have attempted to answer these questions by focusing on, one, historical and social provenance, two, delineating compositional strata, and three, ancient Near Eastern comparisons. This study attempts to remedy certain gaps and conflicts in the secondary literature. The foundation of this study is a systematic analysis of the 12 passages that in D, along with a discussion of Deut 23:2-9, which does not use the noun גר mention the conceptuality. These analyses incorporate germane גר but I argue is central to D’s , גר textual critical inquiries and synchronic interpretive constraints, such as lexical and grammatical data, semantic relationships, terminological usage in D, and determinatives from the immediate context. On the basis of this foundation, I appraise scholarly texts by theme or by distinct historical referents. I then גר endeavors to subdivide D’s and I present a series of , גר proffer a response to the leading views of the ethnicity of D’s s ethnic origins. I then show how D’ גר indicators for my own conclusions on the .uniquely in the legal core (chs. 12-26) and the prologue-epilogue (chs גר represents the 1, 5, 29, 30). The study next investigates two of D’s formulae, “for you were an immigrant the land of Egypt” and “remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt,” and offers a validation for reading these formulae as semantically distinct motivational clauses. According to the data, I seek to nuance our comprehension of the meaning of these clauses, identify parameters for ascertaining their literary origins, and critique a hypothesis on the Pentateuch’s transmission history. This diachronic approach naturally raises questions for other diachronic factors, such as inner-biblical exegesis. I, therefore, laws. After arguing for the גר turn to investigate D’s interpretation of other Tetrateuchal advantages of a relative dating approach to D’s laws over a reconstructive approach, I consider the advances of recent discussions on inner-biblical interpretation, the relationship between D’s laws and other legal corpora, and signs for the direction of laws in Exodus 20-23, but stands גר literary influence. I contend that D revises certain .laws גר lexically and, in most cases, ideationally independent of H’s register of Exploring D’s revision of the Covenant Code and comparing D with H reveals D’s .laws גר redemptive and accommodative tendencies in the drafting of its I culminate the dissertation by exploring sociological, comparative (ancient Near These aspects clarify our . גר Eastern), theological, and missiological aspects of D’s socially and religiously. These גר understanding of D’s vision for Israel to integrate the aspects also provide a framework for discussing the implications of Israel’s election for .who lived in Israel’s towns גר its responsibility toward the DISSERTATION APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation, entitled “He Loves the Immigrant”: גר Deuteronomy’s Theological and Social Vision for the written by Mark Abraham Awabdy and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biblical Studies has been read and approved by the undersigned members of the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary _______________________________ Dr. Bill T. Arnold, Mentor _______________________________ Dr. John A. Cook, Reader May 2012 “He Loves the Immigrant”: גר Deuteronomy’s Theological and Social Vision for the A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary Wilmore, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biblical Studies Dissertation Committee: Dr. Bill T. Arnold, Mentor Dr. John A. Cook, Reader By Mark Abraham Awabdy May 2012 Copyright 2012 Mark Abraham Awabdy All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction in the Old Testament גר Investigative Methods on the .1.1 1.1.1. Lexico-Syntagmatic Approach 1.1.2. Sociological Approach 1.1.3. Sociohistorical Referential Approach 1.1.4. Theological and Related Approaches 1.2. This Study’s Aim and Structure: Incentives of a Composite Hermeneutic in Deuteronomy גר Chapter 2: Studies on the 2.1. Historical and Social Provenance 2.1.1. Seventh Century Israelites 2.1.2. Seventh Century Judahites 2.1.3. Derivative and Divergent Views 2.1.4. Eighth or Ninth Century Israelites 2.2. Delineating Compositional Strata 2.2.1. A Generous Redactor 2.2.2. Three Strata: Pre-D, Pre-exilic D and Post-exilic D 2.2.3. Two Strata: Deuteronomic Reforms and Exilic/Post-exilic Cultus 2.3. Ancient Near Eastern Comparisons 2.3.1. Formulating the Deuteronomic Triad 2.3.2. Motivations for Social Action: Near Eastern or Distinctly Israelite? 2.4. Prospect for this Study iii Chapter 3: Establishing and Analyzing the Texts 3.1. Synchronic Interpretive Boundaries 3.1.1. Deut 1:16-17 3.1.2. Deut 5:13-15 3.1.3. Deut 10:17-19 3.1.4. Deut 14:21 3.1.5. Deut 14:28-29 3.1.6. Deut 16:10-14 3.1.7. Deut 23:2-9 3.1.7.1. Introductory Issues ?in 23:2-9 קהל יהוה What is .3.1.7.2 3.1.7.3. Who are the non-Israelites in 23:4-9? 3.1.8. Deut 24:14-22 3.1.9. Deut 26:10-13 3.1.10. Deut 27:19 3.1.11. Deut 28:43-44 3.1.12. Deut 29:8-12 3.1.13. Deut 31:10-13 Continuity and Pluriformity : גר Deuteronomy’s .3.2 3.2.1. Exploring Thematic Subdivisions 3.2.2. Investigating the Possibility of Historical Referents 3.2.3. Detecting Ethnicity: Israelite, Judahite, or Non-Israelite/Non-Judahite iv 3.3. Conclusions: Rhetoric of a New Status Chapter 4: Immigrant-in-Egypt and Slave-in-Egypt Formulae: Demarcations, Import, and Origins 4.1. Introducing the Formulae Egypt: Evidence of a Semantic Distinction- עבד Egypt and- גר .4.2 activity in Exod 1:9-14:31 עבד activity in Gen 45-Exod 1:5 and גור .4.2.1 4.2.2. Israel-in-Egypt texts in D 4.2.3. Historical précis: Gen 15:13 and Deut 26:5-6 Experience גור Genesis 45-50: Jacob’s sojourn as Israel’s .4.3 4.4. Semantic Distinction within D in Egypt גר .4.4.1 in Egypt עבד .4.4.2 Egypt Formulae- עבד Egypt and- גר Positing the Origins of D’s .4.5 4.6. Revisiting the überlieferungsgeschichtliche Problem: Interfacing a Growing Egypt Traditions- עבד Egypt and- גר Consensus with D’s 4.7. Conclusions and Torah: D’s Interpretation of the Covenant Code and Distinction גר Chapter 5: The from H 5.1. Deuteronomy and Inner-Biblical Interpretation: Methodological Developments 5.1.1. Deuteronomy’s Laws: Reconstructive versus Relative Dating 5.1.2. D, H and Exodus 20-23: Debates on Inner-Biblical Textuality laws גר Inner-Biblical Exegesis and D’s .5.1.3 v 5.1.4. Indicators of the Direction of Literary Influence laws from D’s גר The Independence of H’s .5.1.5 Regulations and contrasts with H גר D’s Revision of Exodus 20-23’s .5.2 5.2.1. A Vicarious Redemption (and the Sabbath (Exod 20:8-11; Deut 5:12-15 גר .5.2.1.1 (and Festive Meals (Exod 12:21-23, 24-27; 23:14-19; Deut 16:1-17 גר .5.2.1.2 5.2.2. A Kind Tôrâ (and Tithes and Sacrifices (Exod 20:24; Deut 12:11-19;14:22-29 גר .5.2.2.1 (and Carcass Consumption (Lev 17:15; Deut 14:21 גר .5.2.2.2 5.3. Conclusions Chapter 6: Social and Religious Integration in the Deuteronomic Code גר Social Integration: The Ancient Near East and the .6.1 6.1.1. Non-Indigenous Residents in a Selection of Ancient Near Eastern Laws s Social Integration in the Deuteronomic Code’ גר Defining the .6.1.2 in Deuteronomy’s Prologue and Epilogue גר Religious Integration: The .6.2 ?Incipient Mission to Non-Israelites : גר Israel’s Election and Deuteronomy’s .6.3 Chapter 7: Conclusions vi ABBREVIATIONS G Old Greek (a majority of Septuagint mss) GA Codex Alexandrinus GAmb Codex Ambrosianus GC Codex Coisliniarus GB Codex Vaticanus GS Codex Sinaiticus GL Lucianic Recension G848 Old Greek fragment, Rahlf’s no. 848 (first century BCE) MT Masoretic Text MT L Leningrad Codex of the Masoretic Text Q Qumran Smr Samaritan Pentateuch S Syriac T Targums (major Targums) TJ Targum Jonathan TN Targum Neofiti TO Targum Onkelos TPJ Targum Pseudo-Jonathan V Latin Vulgate vii PREFACE The seedbed for this project was cultivated in 2007, when my masters’ program advisor, David Livermore, insisted I read Christopher Wright’s The Mission of God .
Recommended publications
  • RARE BX2080.A2 Book of Hours for Dominican Use Northwestern France? S
    Manuscript description by Brittany Rancour RARE BX2080.A2 Book of Hours for Dominican Use Northwestern France? S. XV2/4 CONTENT The Seven Penitential Psalms (f.1r); a Litany of the Saints (f.12v3); Agnus dei (f. 17v5), Alma Redemptoris Mater (f.18r1), Suffrages (f. 18v2), the Hours of the Cross (f.20v1); the Hours of the Holy Spirit at Matins (f.23v1); Memorials to the saints (f.26r1); the Office of the Dead with vespers, Matins (first, second, and third night readings), and Lauds (f.31r11-61v3); Prayers for use at Mass (f.63v7), the hymn Ave verum corpus (f.66r2), and the Obsecro te (f.67r1). MODERN EDITIONS Medievalist.net. “A Hypertext Book of Hours.” http://medievalist.net/hourstxt/home.htm. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION Parchment. 71 folios. Multiple scribes. 9 quires I-II8, III6, IV-VIII8, IX9 lacking final blank. Catch words at the end of each quire provide the first word of the next quire. HF’FH. Bound, s. XV. Dimensions of folio 11.5 cm X 8.7 cm. Text dimensions 6 cm X 5 cm. 14 long lines, ruled by dry point with single vertical bounding lines. Prickings in outer margins. Gothic textura. Blank spaces left for miniatures (f.1r, 31r). Decorated initials in gold leaf, frequently with red pen flourishes. Decorated initial D in purple box (f.1r). Decorated initial D in a decorated square bordered in gold with gold dots and filled in purple, purple and gold dots continue staining the left upper and outer margins; the decoration is not complete, only part of the outer left margin has been stained purple, and some bole dots were added without the gold leaf decoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Moore Cross's Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Classics and Religious Studies Department 2014 Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls" (2014). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 127. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford This paper examines the impact of Frank Moore Cross on the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Since Cross was a member of the original editorial team responsible for publishing the Cave 4 materials, his influence on the field was vast. The article is limited to those areas of Scrolls study not covered in other articles; the reader is referred especially to the articles on palaeography and textual criticism for further discussion of Cross’s work on the Scrolls. t is difficult to overestimate the impact the discovery They icturedp two columns of a manuscript, columns of of the Dead Sea Scrolls had on the life and career of the Book of Isaiah .
    [Show full text]
  • The Covenant Renewal Ceremony As the Main Function of Qumran
    religions Article The Covenant Renewal Ceremony as the Main Function of Qumran Daniel Vainstub Department of Bible, Archaeology and Ancient Near East, Ben‑Gurion University, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel; [email protected] Abstract: Unlike any other group or philosophy in ancient Judaism, the yahad sect obliged all mem‑ ˙ bers of the sect to leave their places of residence all over the country and gather in the sect’s central site to participate in a special annual ceremony of renewal of the covenant between God and each of the members. The increase of the communities that composed the sect and their spread over the en‑ tire country during the first century BCE required the development of the appropriate infrastructure for hosting this annual gathering at Qumran. Consequently, the hosting of the gathering became the main function of the site, and the southern esplanade with the buildings surrounding it became the epicenter of the site. Keywords: Qumran; Damascus Document; scrolls; mikveh 1. Introduction The subject of this paper is the yearly gathering during the festival of Shavuot of all members of the communities that composed the yahad sect.1 After close examination of the Citation: Vainstub, Daniel. 2021. The ˙ evidence for this annual gathering in the sect’s writings and analysis of the archaeological Covenant Renewal Ceremony as the data on the development of the site of Qumran, it became evident that in the generation Main Function of Qumran. Religions 12: 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ following that of the site’s founders, the holding of the annual gathering became the main ¶ rel12080578 raison d’ tre of the site and the factor that dictated its architectural development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israelite Household and the Decalogue: the Social Background and Significance of Some Commandments*
    Tyndale Bulletin 30 (1979) 101-124. THE ISRAELITE HOUSEHOLD AND THE DECALOGUE: THE SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME COMMANDMENTS* By Christopher J. H. Wright Decalogue study is still in a state of some confusion, with little apparent consensus in any of the critical disciplines./1/ Nevertheless, most scholars, whatever their views on authorship, date, original form, history, etc., agree in recognizing the position of unique importance accorded to the Decalogue in Israel's understanding of her relationship with God. The evidence that it was assigned a unique place of importance by the Old Testament itself, and not just by subsequent Jewish and Christian interpreters, is manifold. The commandments have a special name, the "ten words" . (cf. also Ex. 31:8; Deut. 4:13; 9:9, etc.). Again, they are repeated in Deuteronomy as providing the foundation for the new promulgation of the covenant. The narrative framework of Exodus, but particularly of Deuteronomy, stressed the finality of the commandments: "These words Yahweh spoke . and added no more" (Deut. 5:22). Finally, the reflection of the commandments in the prophets (Hos. 4:lff; Jer. 7:9ff), and in the Psalms (50 and 81) testify to their influence upon Israel's faith./2/ * A paper read at the Tyndale Fellowship Old Testament Study Group in Cambridge, July 1977. 1. For surveys of the critical literature, see J. J. Stamm and M. E. Andrew, The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (London, 1967), and B. S. Childs, Exodus: A Commentary (London, 1974). 2. B. S. Childs, op. cit., 397. 102 TYNDALE BULLETIN 30 (1979) The strength of this influence is reflected in the association of the Decalogue with Sinai, which indicates that it was felt to be essential as the revelation of what in practice was required of those who there became God's people.
    [Show full text]
  • Japheth and Balaam
    Redemption 304: Further Study on Japheth and Balaam biblestudying.net Brian K. McPherson and Scott McPherson Copyright 2012 Melchizedek (Shem), Japheth, and Balaam Summary of Relevant Information from Genesis Regarding Melchizedek and Abraham This exploratory paper assumes the conclusions of section three of our “Priesthood and the Kinsman Redeemer” study which identifies Melchizedek as Noah’s son Shem. Melchizedek was priest of Jerusalem (Salem) and possibly of the region in general. Shem was granted dominion over all the Canaanites by Noah. Genesis 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. 24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. Melchizedek is clearly presented as a king. And Abraham clearly pays tithes or tribute to this king after a victory in battle. Genesis 14:18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. 19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: 20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Perrin 2019 David Noel Freedman Award for Excellence
    Andrew Perrin 2019 David Noel Freedman Award for Excellence and Creativity in Hebrew Bible Scholarship We are pleased to announce that the 2019 David Noel Freedman Award for Excellence and Creativity in Hebrew Bible Scholarship has been awarded to Andrew Perrin for his paper entitled, “Danielic Pseudepigraphy in/and the Hebrew Scriptures? Remodeling the Structure and Scope of Daniel Traditions at Qumran.” Andrew Perrin (Ph.D Religious Studies, McMaster University, 2013) is Canada Research Chair in Religious Identities of Ancient Judaism and Director of the Dead Sea Scrolls Institute at Trinity Western University in Langley, British Columbia, Canada. His research explores the life, thought, and literature of Second Temple Judaism through the lens of the Dead Sea Scrolls. His book The Dynamics of Dream-Vision Revelation in the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015) won the Manfred Lautenschlaeger Award for Theological Promise from the University of Heidelberg. Aspects of his work have been published in Journal of Biblical Literature, Dead Sea Discoveries, Vetus Testamentum, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, and Biblical Archaeology Review, with a co-authored article in Revue de Qumran winning the Norman E. Wagner Award from the Canadian Society of Biblical Studies. He has been a fellow of the Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem and of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. He is currently writing a commentary on priestly literature in the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls, which was awarded an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. The goal of the Freedman Award is to promote excellence and creativity in Hebrew Bible scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By
    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara By Mira Beth Wasserman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair Professor Chana Kronfeld Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Kenneth Bamberger Spring 2014 Abstract The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara by Mira Beth Wasserman Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair In this dissertation, I argue that there is an ethical dimension to the Babylonian Talmud, and that literary analysis is the approach best suited to uncover it. Paying special attention to the discursive forms of the Talmud, I show how juxtapositions of narrative and legal dialectics cooperate in generating the Talmud's distinctive ethics, which I characterize as an attentiveness to the “exceptional particulars” of life. To demonstrate the features and rewards of a literary approach, I offer a sustained reading of a single tractate from the Babylonian Talmud, ʿAvoda Zara (AZ). AZ and other talmudic discussions about non-Jews offer a rich resource for considerations of ethics because they are centrally concerned with constituting social relationships and with examining aspects of human experience that exceed the domain of Jewish law. AZ investigates what distinguishes Jews from non-Jews, what Jews and non- Jews share in common, and what it means to be a human being. I read AZ as a cohesive literary work unified by the overarching project of examining the place of humanity in the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access
    690 American Archivist / Vol. 56 / Fall 1993 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/56/4/690/2748590/aarc_56_4_w213201818211541.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access SARA S. HODSON Abstract: The announcement by the Huntington Library in September 1991 of its decision to open for unrestricted research its photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls touched off a battle of wills between the library and the official team of scrolls editors, as well as a blitz of media publicity. The action was based on a commitment to the principle of intellectual freedom, but it must also be considered in light of the ethics of donor agreements and of access restrictions. The author relates the story of the events leading to the Huntington's move and its aftermath, and she analyzes the issues involved. About the author: Sara S. Hodson is curator of literary manuscripts at the Huntington Library. Her articles have appeared in Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook, and the Huntington Library Quarterly. This article is revised from a paper delivered before the Manuscripts Repositories Section meeting of the 1992 Society of American Archivists conference in Montreal. The author wishes to thank William A. Moffett for his encour- agement and his thoughtful and invaluable review of this article in its several revisions. Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls 691 ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1991, THE HUNTINGTON scrolls for historical scholarship lies in their LIBRARY set off a media bomb of cata- status as sources contemporary with the time clysmic proportions when it announced that they illuminate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biblical Texts from the Judean Desert—An Overview and Analysis
    CHAPTER TEN THE BIBLICAL TEXTS FROM THE JUDEAN DESERT—AN OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS 1. Introduction and Statistics In many ways, the newly discovered texts have revolutionized the study of the text of Hebrew Scripture, as well as that of Greek Scripture. Many aspects of the transmission of the biblical text can now be illustrated by the Judean Desert texts, and occasionally this applies also to the last stages of the literary growth of the biblical books. In the scholarly jargon it may sound a little bombastic to speak of “revolutionizing” the field, but this term probably describes the finds from the Judean Desert correctly, especially the ones from Qumran. Some may claim that the texts found outside Qumran in Wadi Murabba‘at, Wadi Sdeir (Naha≥ l David), Naha≥ l He≥ ver, Naha≥ l Se≥ ’elim, and Masada are uninteresting, as they “merely” confirm the medieval MT, but these texts, too, are in many ways remarkable.1 The novel aspects relating to all these texts from the Judean Desert pertain not only to the new data, but also to a better understanding of the sources known prior to the Qumran finds.2 1 Information concerning the provenance of the biblical texts is usually rather stable. At the same time, 4QPsq may derive from Naha≥ l He≥ ver (see P. W. Skehan, E. Ulrich and P. W. Flint, DJD XVI, 145). The provenance of XLev, XJosh, XJudg, and XMinor Prophets as well as that of all the texts mentioned in n. 7 is equally unclear. 2 For my own summaries, see: “A Modern Textual Outlook Based on the Qumran Scrolls,” HUCA 53 (1982) 11–27; “Hebrew Biblical Manuscripts from the Judaean Desert: Their Contribution to Textual Criticism,” JJS 39 (1988) 1–37; “The Significance of the Texts from the Judean Desert for the History of the Text of the Hebrew Bible—A New Synthesis,” in Qumran between the Old and the New Testament (ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Numbers 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Numbers 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE The title the Jews used in their Hebrew Old Testament for this book comes from the fifth word in the book in the Hebrew text, bemidbar: "in the wilderness." This is, of course, appropriate since the Israelites spent most of the time covered in the narrative of Numbers in the wilderness. The English title "Numbers" is a translation of the Greek title Arithmoi. The Septuagint translators chose this title because of the two censuses of the Israelites that Moses recorded at the beginning (chs. 1—4) and toward the end (ch. 26) of the book. These "numberings" of the people took place at the beginning and end of the wilderness wanderings and frame the contents of Numbers. DATE AND WRITER Moses wrote Numbers (cf. Num. 1:1; 33:2; Matt. 8:4; 19:7; Luke 24:44; John 1:45; et al.). He apparently wrote it late in his life, across the Jordan from the Promised Land, on the Plains of Moab.1 Moses evidently died close to 1406 B.C., since the Exodus happened about 1446 B.C. (1 Kings 6:1), the Israelites were in the wilderness for 40 years (Num. 32:13), and he died shortly before they entered the Promised Land (Deut. 34:5). There are also a few passages that appear to have been added after Moses' time: 12:3; 21:14-15; and 32:34-42. However, it is impossible to say how much later. 1See the commentaries for fuller discussions of these subjects, e.g., Gordon J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2000 The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints Donald W. Parry Stephen D. Ricks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Parry, Donald W. and Ricks, Stephen D., "The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints" (2000). Maxwell Institute Publications. 25. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Preface What is the Copper Scroll? Do the Dead Sea Scrolls contain lost books of the Bible? Did John the Baptist study with the people of Qumran? What is the Temple Scroll? What about DNA research and the scrolls? We have responded to scores of such questions on many occasions—while teaching graduate seminars and Hebrew courses at Brigham Young University, presenting papers at professional symposia, and speaking to various lay audiences. These settings are always positive experiences for us, particularly because they reveal that the general membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a deep interest in the scrolls and other writings from the ancient world. The nonbiblical Dead Sea Scrolls are of great import because they shed much light on the cultural, religious, and political position of some of the Jews who lived shortly before and during the time of Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • RELI 2110A: Judaism
    Carleton University Summer 2015 The College of the Humanities Religion Program RELI 2110A: Judaism Rabbi Ely M. Braun Office: 2A35 PA Home Phone: 613-721-7629 Email:[email protected] Lectures: Tuesday and Thursday 6:05 pm – 8:55 pm Office Hours: Thursdays 5:00 – 6:00 or by appointment Course description This 2000 level course explores Judaism as a lived religious tradition. We begin with the premise that Judaism is defined by the teachings, beliefs and practices that form the core of Jewish communal life. From this point of view, Judaism is both historical and evolving; rooted in tradition, responding to changing contexts, looking towards its own future. Practiced by Jews in community all around the world, Judaism is a dynamic and richly diverse tradition that includes a range of teachings and practices. This diversity can be a challenge for students who are at the early stages of studying Judaism. One way into this problem is to begin where Jewish communities begin in defining their own identity: Jews understand themselves as standing in relationship to, and in continuity with, a historical past, practices and traditions. We will examine Jewish practices as they relate to the calendar and life cycle. We will examine the response of Judaism to history, culture conflicts and geographic changes. Course Evaluation: The final grade of this course is based on the followings: 10% creating questions on readings and lectures 90% 3 tests (2 will be take-home*, the last will be an electronically graded multiple-choice test to be given as part of the scheduled final exam period – the date will be announced and scheduled by the University) * Due dates: May 21st and June 4th.
    [Show full text]