DOCSLIB.ORG

Uneasy Coexistence: “Islamism Vs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uneasy Coexistence: “Islamism Vs UNEASY COEXISTENCE: “ISLAMISM VS. REPUBLICANISM” DEBATE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY PINAR ARIKAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DECEMBER 2006 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer AYATA Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Meliha ALTUNIŞIK Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Meliha ALTUNI ŞIK Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. İhsan D. Da ğı (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur (METU, HIST) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Pınar Arıkan Signature: iii ABSTRACT UNEASY COEXISTENCE: “ISLAMISM VS. REPUBLICANISM” DEBATE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Arıkan, Pınar M. Sc., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık December 2006, 170 pages The objective of this thesis is to analyze the Islamist and republican features of the political regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It aims to identify the relationship between Islamism and republicanism in terms of institutional and practical means throughout the period since the establishment of the Islamic Republic. It seeks an answer to the question of how the Islamist and republican orientations that built up the political regime and the system of governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran have affected the domestic political and ideological developments. For this aim, firstly, the history of ulama -state relations as well as the history of constitutional tradition in Iran is discussed. Then, the impact of Islamism and republicanism in the process of establishment of the new regime in Iran is examined. Afterwards, the emergence of Islamism and republicanism as indigenous ideological currents and the political groups that appealed to these two orientations are analyzed with special emphasis to the role of Khomeini in this process. In the remaining part, the institutional and practical implications of the coexistence of Islamist and republican orientations are scrutinized during the presidencies of Rafsanjani and Khatami respectively. Finally, this thesis is concluded with an overall assessment of Islamism vs. republicanism debate with reference to the 2005 presidential elections. Key Words: Iran, Islamism, Republicanism, Religious Sovereignty, Popular Sovereignty, Factional Politics and Political Groups, Velayat-e Faqih , Constitution. iv ÖZ ZOR B İRL İKTEL İK: İRAN İSLAM CUMHUR İYET İ’NDE “ İSLAMCILIK KAR ŞISINDA CUMHUR İYETÇ İLİK” TARTI ŞMASI Arıkan, Pınar Yüksek Lisans, Uluslararası İli şkiler Anabilim Dalı Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık Aralık 2006, 170 sayfa Bu tezin amacı İran İslam Cumhuriyeti siyasi rejiminin İslamcı ve cumhuriyetçi unsurlarını analiz etmektir. Bu tez, İslam Cumhuriyeti kuruldu ğundan bu yana geçen sürede İslamcılık ve cumhuriyetçilik arasındaki ili şkiyi hem kurumsal açıdan hem de uygulama açısından tanımlamayı hedeflemektedir. İslam Cumhuriyeti’nin siyasi rejimini ve yönetim sistemini birlikte in şa eden İslamcılık ve cumhuriyetçilik yönelimlerinin iç siyasi ve ideolojik geli şmeleri nasıl etkiledi ği sorusuna cevap aramaktadır. Bu amaçla, ilk olarak, İran’da ulema-devlet ili şkilerinin tarihiyle birlikte anayasacı gelene ğin tarihi tartı şılacaktır. Daha sonra yeni rejimin kurulu şu sürecinde İslamcılık ve cumhuriyetçilik e ğilimlerinin etkisi incelenecektir. Sonrasında, İslamcılık ve cumhuriyetçilik e ğilimlerinin özgün ideolojik akımlar olarak ortaya çıkı şı ve bu e ğilimleri savunan siyasi gruplar Humeyni’nin bu süreçteki rolü vurgulanarak analiz edilecektir. Geri kalan kısımda ise sırasıyla Rafsancani’nin ve Hatemi’nin cumhurba şkanlıkları dönemlerinde İslamcı ve cumhuriyetçi e ğimlerin birlikteliklerinin kurumsal ve pratik anlamdaki sonuçları mercek altına alınacaktır. Son olarak bu tez 2005 cumhurba şkanlı ğı seçimlerine de ğinerek İslamcılık kar şısında cumhuriyetçilik tartı şmasının genel bir de ğerlendirmesiyle sonuçlanacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: İran, İslamcılık, Cumhuriyetçilik, Dini Me şruiyet, Halka Dayalı Me şruiyet, Fraksiyonel Siyaset ve Siyasi Gruplar, Velayet-e Fakih , Anayasa. v To my dears; my mother, my sister, and my beloved… vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank to my thesis supervisor with all my heart, Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık, for her invaluable support, encouragement, guidance, advice, criticism and insight throughout this study. Without her patience and belief in me, I would not be able to complete this study. Also I would like to mention my gratitude to my thesis committee, Prof. Dr. İhsan D. Da ğı and Associate Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur for their advice and valuable comments. I am extremely indebted to my mother Nazime Gürsoy and my sister Burcu Arıkan who have always supported me in every step of my life with an unquestioned faith in me. Thanks to their trust, I have been able to go beyond all the obstacles that I have encountered. My dear Bayram, who has not only supported me emotionally but also read every sentence of this thesis time and again and made momentous comments, deserves the most special thanks. I would like to thank to my dear friends Çi ğdem, Aslı and Nurdan for their special friendship for long years, which will confidently last all through my life. I also thank to Eda, Derya, Duran and Burcu for their patience, support and encouragement throughout this study. My special thanks also go to all my colleagues at the Department of International Relations who always stand by me with their friendship and encouragement. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM……………………………………………………………………….iii ABSTRACT...…………………………………………………………………….....iv ÖZ…………………………………………………………………………………….v DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………….vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………vii TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………..viii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.……………………………………………………….1 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC………..………...21 2.1. The Process of Drafting the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran…………….............................................................................22 2.1.1. Formation of the Constituent Assembly of Experts……..…..25 2.1.2. Re-drafting the Constitution and Inclusion of Articles about Velayat-e Faqih ………..………………..…………….30 2. 2. Criticism and Consent on the Notion of Velayat-e Faqih and its Inclusion into the Constitution…...……………………...…….36 2.2.1. Debate on “Velayat-e Faqih” in the Constituent Assembly of Experts……...….……………………………36 2.2.2. Debate on “Velayat-e Faqih” Outside the Constituent Assembly of Experts……………………….…..…………..40 2.3. Islamist and Republican Institutions of Government in the 1979 Constitution…...…………………….……………….………..44 2.3.1. Islamist Institutions of Government………………..…..…...44 2.3.1.1. The Office of the Vali-ye Faqih (Rahbariyyat )…….44 2.3.1.2. The Guardian Council (Shora-ye Negahban )………45 2.3.1.3. The Assembly of Experts (Shora-ye Khobregan )….48 2.3.1.4. The Expediency Council (Majma‘-e Tashkhis-e Maslahat-e Nezam) ….…….50 2.3.1.5. The Judiciary…………………..……………..….....51 2.3.2. Republican Institutions of Government………….……..…..52 viii 2.3.2.1. The Parliament ( Majles-e Shora-ye Eslami )…….....52 2.3.2.2. The Presidency ( Reis-e Jomhuri )……………...…...53 3. EMERGENCE OF ISLAMIST AND REPUBLICAN TENDENCIES IN KHOMEINI ERA…...……………………………………………….56 3. 1. Reflections of Dual Sources of Legitimacy in the Process of Consolidation of the Revolutionary Regime in Iran………......…...56 3.2. Contesting Political Groups in Khomeini Period..……………….....59 3.2.1. The ‘Conservative’ Organizations in Khomeini Period……..60 3.2.1.1. Split within Conservative Camp………………..…..61 3.2.2. The ‘Radical’ Organizations in Khomeini Period..……...…..62 3.2.2.1. Split within Radical Camp…………..………..…….64 3. 3. Khomeini as the “Final Arbiter” ( Faslol-Khetab )……………..…..65 3.3.1. The Doctrine of Maslahat - Zarurat as the Tool of Legitimation………………………………………………....67 3.3.2. Instances of the Factional Rivalry in the 1980s and Khomeini’s Arbitration……………………………………...67 3.3.2.1. Land Reform Issue……………………………..…...67 3.3.2.2. Specification of Government’s Jurisdiction………...69 3.3.2.3. Establishment of the Expediency Council (Majma’a-ye Tashkis-e Maslahat-e Nezam )………...70 3.3.2.4. Khomeini’s Arbitration on Cultural Issues….............71 3. 4. 1989 Constitutional Amendments………………………..………...72 3.4.1. Velayat-e Faqih in the Constitution after 1989 Amendments…...……………………………………………74 3.4.2. The Executive Branch in the Constitution after 1989 Amendments…….………………………………………….76 3.4.3. The Judiciary Branch in the Constitution after 1989 Amendments………...………………………………………77 3. 5. The Islamist and Republican Viewpoints on the Features of the Regime after Khomeini…………………………………………….78 4. STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE ISLAMISTS AND THE REPUBLICANS UNDER RAFSANJANI’S PRESIDENCY…………...80 ix 4.1. Changing Landscape of Iranian Politics in the 1990’s……..……....80 4.1.1. The Right………………..……………………………….…81 4.1.1.1. The Traditional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran Human Rights Defenders Report 2019/20
    IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS REPORT 2019/20 Table of Contents Definition of terms and concepts 4 Introduction 7 LAWYERS Amirsalar Davoudi 9 Payam Derafshan 10 Mohammad Najafi 11 Nasrin Sotoudeh 12 CIVIL ACTIVISTS Zartosht Ahmadi-Ragheb 13 Rezvaneh Ahmad-Khanbeigi 14 Shahnaz Akmali 15 Atena Daemi 16 Golrokh Ebrahimi-Irayi 17 Farhad Meysami 18 Narges Mohammadi 19 Mohammad Nourizad 20 Arsham Rezaii 21 Arash Sadeghi 22 Saeed Shirzad 23 Imam Ali Popular Student Relief Society 24 TEACHERS Esmaeil Abdi 26 Mahmoud Beheshti-Langroudi 27 Mohammad Habibi 28 MINORITY RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Mary Mohammadi 29 Zara Mohammadi 30 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation 31 Workers rights ACTIVISTS Marzieh Amiri 32 This report has been prepared by Iran Human Rights (IHR) Esmaeil Bakhshi 33 Sepideh Gholiyan 34 Leila Hosseinzadeh 35 IHR is an independent non-partisan NGO based in Norway. Abolition of the Nasrin Javadi 36 death penalty, supporting human rights defenders and promoting the rule of law Asal Mohammadi 37 constitute the core of IHR’s activities. Neda Naji 38 Atefeh Rangriz 39 Design and layout: L Tarighi Hassan Saeedi 40 © Iran Human Rights, 2020 Rasoul Taleb-Moghaddam 41 WOMEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Raha Ahmadi 42 Raheleh Ahmadi 43 Monireh Arabshahi 44 Yasaman Aryani 45 Mojgan Keshavarz 46 Saba Kordafshari 47 Nedaye Zanan Iran 48 www.iranhr.net Recommendations 49 Endnotes 50 : @IHRights | : @iranhumanrights | : @humanrightsiran Definition of Terms & Concepts PRISONS Evin Prison: Iran’s most notorious prison where Wards 209, 240 and 241, which have solitary cells called security“suites” and are controlled by the Ministry of Intelligence (MOIS): Ward 209 Evin: dedicated to security prisoners under the jurisdiction of the MOIS.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Imperatives and the Neorealist State: Iran and Realpolitik
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2000-12 National security imperatives and the neorealist state: Iran and realpolitik. Grogan, Michael S. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/7744 ^U^£SCHOou DUDLEY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS NATIONAL SECURITY IMPERATIVES AND THE NEOREALIST STATE: IRAN AND REALPOLITIK by Michael S. Grogan December 2000 Thesis Co-Advisors: Ahmad Ghoreishi Glenn E. Robinson Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704- 0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202- 4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2000 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Title (Mix case letters) 5. FUNDING NUMBERS National Security Imperatives and the Neorealist State: Iran and Realpolitik 6. AUTHOR(S) Michael S. Grogan 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) I. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    IRAN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 28 June 2011 IRAN JUNE 2011 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN FROM 14 MAY TO 21 JUNE Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 14 MAY AND 21 JUNE Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.04 Iran ..................................................................................................................... 1.04 Tehran ................................................................................................................ 1.05 Calendar ................................................................................................................ 1.06 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.07 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Pre 1979: Rule of the Shah .................................................................................. 3.01 From 1979 to 1999: Islamic Revolution to first local government elections ... 3.04 From 2000 to 2008: Parliamentary elections
    [Show full text]
  • República Islámica De Irán
    OFICINA DE INFORMACIÓN DIPLOMÁTICA FICHA PAÍS Irán República Islámica de Irán La Oficina de Información Diplomática del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación pone a disposición de los profesionales de los medios de comunicación y del público en general la presente ficha país. La información contenida en esta ficha país es pública y se ha extraído de diversos medios no oficiales. La presente ficha país no defiende posición política alguna ni de este Ministerio ni del Gobierno de España respecto del país sobre el que versa. FEBRERO 2018 Constitución. Además, en torno a un 25 % de la población tiene una variedad Irán del turco como lengua materna y se hablan otros idiomas minoritarios, como el kurdo. Moneda: Rial iraní (cambio a 4 de febrero de 2018: 1€ = 46.086 riales) Religión: El Islam está consagrado en la Constitución hoy vigente como religión oficial. La mayoría musulmana iraní (un 96% de la población total) es chiíta (en Mar Caspio torno al 89% de los musulmanes). Hay una minoría musulmana que pertenece TURQUÍA Tabriz a la creencia autóctona conocida como bahaísmo. Existe una importante mino- TURKMENISTÁN ría cristiana de origen armenio, junto a asirio-caldeos; también hay un pequeño Mashhad grupo de judíos y de seguidores del Zoroastrismo. Teherán Forma de Estado: El artículo 1 de la Constitución de 1979 define a Irán como una República Islámica. El sistema se basa en la distinción entre un Ejecutivo encabezado por el Presidente de la República y compuesto por los distintos mi- Isfahán AFGANISTÁN nisterios, que gestiona la administración del país, y un Legislativo o Majlis, que de manera efectiva aprueba las leyes y vota a los candidatos a ministro propues- IRAK Ahvaz tos por el Presidente.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Under Khatami
    IRAN UNDER KHATAMI A Political, Economic, and Military Assessment Patrick Clawson Michael Eisenstadt Eliyahu Kanovsky David Menashri A Washington Institute Monograph THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, re- cording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 1998 by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Published in 1998 in the United States of America by the Washing- ton Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Iran under Khatami: a political, economic, and military assess- ment / Patrick L. Clawson ... [et al.]. p. cm. ISBN 0-944029-27-2 (pbk.) 1. Iran—Politics and government—1997- 2. Khatami, Muhammad. 3. Iran—Economic conditions—1997- 4. Iran—Foreign relations—1997- 5. Iran—Military policy. I. Clawson, Patrick, 1951- . DS318.9.I73 1998 955.05'43—dc21 98-39718 CIP Cover design by Monica Neal Hertzman. Cover image AFP Photo/ Jamshid Bairami/Corbis. CONTENTS Contributors v Preface vii 1 The Khatami Paradox Patrick Clawson 1 2 Whither Iranian Politics? The Khatami Factor David Menashri 13 3 Iran's Sick Economy Prospects for Change under Khatami Eliyahu Kanovsky 53 4 The Military Dimension Michael Eisenstadt 71 5 Opportunities and Challenges for U.S. Policy Patrick Clawson and Michael Eisenstadt 99 CONTRIBUTORS Patrick Clawson is director for research at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy and senior editor of the Middle East Quarterly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Petroleum & Energy Club
    In the Name of God Proceedings of Iranian Petroleum & Energy Club Congress IPEC 2018 IRIB International Conference Center 16- 18 October 2018 Book Title: Collection of Speeches by the 4th Petroleum & Energy Congress Organization Name: Iranian Petroleum and Energy Club Publisher: Institute of Rooyesh Rahbord Tosee Aria Circulation: 1000 Volumes Pages Number: 412 Print Size: Vaziri Publication Date: June 2019 Editor: Mohammad Sadegh Azimifar Typography and Cover Design: Elaheh Lotfi CopyRight by: (Institute of Rooyesh Rahbord Tosee Aria) The 4th Iranian Petroleum & Energy Club Congress & Exhibition Organizer: The Iranian Petroleum & Energy Club Introduction Iranian Petroleum & Energy Club aims to promote efficiency and sustainable growth in Iranian energy sector by providing demand led policy advice based on professional experience and frontier research. As a professional and nonprofit association, we facilitate knowledge transfer to hundreds of energy executives and young entrepreneurs which help them better understand the financial and management issues that shape the current energy environment in Iran. In collaboration with our network of professional executives, leading academics and field experts, we provide impartial and evidence-based policy recommendations for decision-makers in the energy sector; recommendations which have been successful in addressing some of the most entrenched challenges of Iranian energy sector. We follow out our missions by forming specific workgroups to perform needed researches and to provide specific and general consultancy to these sections and provide strategy, solutions and also to hold strategic meetings, conferences and congresses. We fit to evaluate the issues from a strategic view, to observe, track and to analyze important and influential events in national, regional and global levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Power and the Mediation of Art:The Lasting Impressions of Artistic Intermediality from Seventeenth Century Persia to Present Shadieh Emami Mirmobiny
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Academic Research and Dissertations Maine State Library Special Collections 2018 Philosophy of Power and the Mediation of Art:The Lasting Impressions of Artistic Intermediality from Seventeenth Century Persia to Present Shadieh Emami Mirmobiny Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/academic PHILOSOPHY OF POWER AND THE MEDIATION OF ART: THE LASTING IMPRESSIONS OF ARTISTIC INTERMEDIALITY FROM SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PERSIA TO PRESENT Shadieh Emami Mirmobiny Submitted to the faculty of The Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy May, 2018 Accepted by the faculty of the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. COMMITTEE MEMBERS Committee Chair: Ali Anooshahr, Ph.D. Professor, Department of History University of California, Davis Committee Member: Christopher Yates, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, and Art Theory Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts Committee Member: EL Putnam, Ph.D. Assistant Lecturer, Dublin School of Creative Arts Dublin Institute of Technology ii © 2018 Shadieh Emami Mirmobiny ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii “Do we need a theory of power? Since a theory assumes a prior objectification, it cannot be asserted as a basis for analytical work. But this analytical work cannot proceed without an ongoing conceptualization. And this conceptualization implies critical thought—a constant checking.” — Foucault To my daughter Ariana, and the young generation of students in the Middle East in search of freedom. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a debt of gratitude to a number of people, without whose assistance and support this dissertation project would not have taken shape and would not have been successfully completed as it was.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of State Identity in Foreign Policy Decision-Making
    The London School of Economics and Political Science UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF STATE IDENTITY IN FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING The Rise and Demise of Saudi–Iranian Rapprochement (1997–2009) ADEL ALTORAIFI A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, October 2012 1 To Mom and Dad—for everything. 2 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. The final word count of this thesis, including titles, footnotes and in-text citations, is 105,889 words. 3 ABSTRACT The objective of the thesis is to study the concept of state identity and its role in foreign policy decision-making through a constructivist analysis, with particular focus on the Saudi–Iranian rapprochement of 1997. While there has been a recent growth in the study of ideational factors and their effects on foreign policy in the Gulf, state identity remains understudied within mainstream International Relations (IR), Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), and even Middle Eastern studies literature, despite its importance and manifestation in the region’s foreign policy discourses. The aim is to challenge purely realist and power-based explanations that have dominated the discourse on Middle Eastern foreign policy—and in particular, the examination of Saudi–Iranian relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Preserves the Ethos of the Takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran by Militant Students in 1979
    Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC) May 14, 2007 Iran preserves the ethos of the takeover of the US embassy in Tehran by militant students in 1979 The staff of the US embassy in Tehran taken hostage (November 4, 1979, www.iranian.com) 2 1. The capture and release of the 15 British soldiers in Iran1 calls for comparison with the takeover of the US embassy in Tehran by Iranian revolutionary students in 1979, which was a major turning point in Iran’s ideological attack on the US (“the Great Satan”) and the West. 2. Many student leaders responsible for the 1979 takeover have now become senior figures in the Iranian regime, mostly in the reformist bloc.2 Even now, the incident remains widely popular in Iran and is considered one of the formative experiences of the Islamic revolution. Even though the latest incident shows that the Iranians are basically willing to employ such tactics, there is a clear difference: the current regime avoided making use of the incident to inflame the emotions of the Iranians and the rest of the world, and released the hostages within a relatively short time. 3. The ethos of the takeover of the embassy is used by Iran as a deterrent to demonstrate the country’s firm stand against the international community, particularly as stances on the nuclear issue are becoming more polarized. Thus, for example, after Security Council Resolution 1737 was passed,3 President Ahmadinejad gave a speech at the site of the former US embassy in which he condemned the West (December 24, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Country Information
    Iran, Country Information COUNTRY ASSESSMENT - IRAN April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV STATE STRUCTURES VA HUMAN RIGHTS - OVERVIEW VB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A - CHRONOLOGY ANNEX B - POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C - PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D - REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum/human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum/human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3. The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4. It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1. The Islamic Republic of Iran Persia until 1935 lies in western Asia, and is bounded on the north by the file:///V|/vll/country/uk_cntry_assess/apr2003/0403_Iran.htm[10/21/2014 9:57:59 AM] Iran, Country Information Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, by Turkey and Iraq to the west, by the Persian Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to the south, and by Pakistan and Afghanistan to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL the QUEEN's AGENTS & CORPORATIONS the Queen's
    ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS & CORPORATIONS The Queen’s Prerogative English law prohibits questioning the Monarchy about their personal holdings and business. This is true of most of Europe’s royalty, whether enthroned or not. The wealth of the Monarchies is held outside of the countries that made the wealth. The British Crown’s offshore banks hold the greatest personal wealth in the world estimated at $35 trillion. Perhaps the British Crown still owns and controls its Commonwealth Nations, including the American “colonies.” Monarchies are not supposed to be warlord bankers who create conflict and chaos to turn a profit or destabilize an economy for personal gain. But they have been for some time now, and history is a string of immoral wars caused by monarchies, the Vatican and other religions. Untold millions have died while kings and popes lived on to grab the wealth through well-established institutions that were created to control the people of the Earth. The Commonwealth of Nations, headed by Queen Elizabeth II, is made up of 53 nations, spanning the globe, accounting for one-fifth of the land mass of the Earth, and a very high percentage of its strategic resources and population. The Queen is a Knight of Malta and has vowed allegiance to the Pope through the largest insider trading club on the planet. The British Crown Agents are, in fact, also agents of the Vatican’s Knights of Malta. The Queen is a Knight of Malta The Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) took control of the power and wealth of the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon from within the Roman system.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN COUNTRY ASSESSMENT April 2002 Country Information And
    IRAN COUNTRY ASSESSMENT April 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit CONTENTS 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.5 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 - 2.2 Economy 2.3 - 2.6 3. HISTORY 3.1 Pre - 1979 3.1 - 3.3 1979 - 1989 3.4 - 3.9 1990 - 1996 3.10 - 3.13 1997 - 1999 3.14- 3.20 2000 3.21-3.28 2001 to Current 3.29- 3.33 4. STATE STRUCTURES Political System and Constitution 4.1 - 4.4 Political Parties 4.5 - 4.9 Judiciary 4.10 - 4.27 Military Service 4.28 - 4.30 Internal Security 4.31 - 4.37 Legal Rights and Detention 4.38 - 4.41 Death Penalty 4.42 - 4.43 Prisons 4.44 - 4.47 Medical Services 4.48 Drugs 4.49 Psychiatric 4.50 - 4.52 People with Disabilities 4.53 Education 4.54 - 4.57 5. HUMAN RIGHTS: OVERVIEW 5.1 - 5.15 Press Law 5.16 - 5.33 Internet and Satellite 5.34 - 5.37 Freedom of Religion 5.38 - 5.43 Legal Framework 5.44 - 5.45 Sunni Muslims 5.46 Christians 5.47 - 5.51 Apostasy 5.52 Jews 5.53 - 5.57 Zoroastrians 5.58 - 5.59 Sabeans (Mandaeans) 5.60 Baha'is 5.61 - 5.70 Freedom of Assembly and Association 5.71 - 5.75 Employment Rights 5.76 - 5.81 Trafficking 5.83 Freedom of Movement 5.84 - 5.90 Refugees in Iran 5.91 - 5.95 5.B. HUMAN RIGHTS: SPECIFIC GROUPS Women 5.96 - 5.109 The Hijab 5.110 - 5.111 Marriage 5.112 - 5.114 Divorce 5.115 - 5.120 Children 5.121 - 5.123 Ethnic minority groups 5.124 Kurds 5.125 Arabs 5.126 - 5.127 Baluchis 5.128 Azeris 5.129 Homosexuals/Transsexuals 5.130 - 5.139 Political Dissent 5.140 - 5.145 Mojahedin-e Khalq 5.146 - 5.147 Rastakhiz Party and Monarchists 5.148 - 5.150 Savak 5.151 Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran 5.152 - 5.153 5.
    [Show full text]