sign in sign up
<<
Home , Superspace

Superconformal multi- moduli spaces in four dimensions

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

Citation Maloney, Alexander, Marcus Spradlin, and . 2002. “Superconformal Multi-Black Hole Moduli Spaces in Four Dimensions.” Journal of High Energy 2002 (4): 003–003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/003.

Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41417338

Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Journal of High Energy Physics

Related content

- N supersymmetric mechanics in harmonic Superconformal multi-black hole moduli spaces in superspace Evgeny Ivanov and Olaf Lechtenfeld four dimensions - Superconformal multi-black hole Jeremy Michelson and Andrew Strominger To cite this article: Alexander Maloney et al JHEP04(2002)003 - New variant of N superconformal mechanics Evgeny Ivanov, Sergey Krivonos and Olaf Lechtenfeld View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations

- Conformal quivers and melting molecules Dionysios Anninos et al

- CONSTRUCTIVE WALL-CROSSING AND SEIBERG–WITTEN PILJIN YI

This content was downloaded from IP address 24.61.242.219 on 27/09/2019 at 10:52 JHEP04(2002)003 . ) e of v R .pdf su- , and 2002 2002 ha (2 found 2, 7, four that to is SL Reissner- tional wn in April en /jhep042002003 are from SISSA/ISAS ersymmetry v ebruary 03 rotations limit sho F 20 or is Sup 200 f 04 uncon ep ccepted: jh spatial A an s/ ersymmetric spaces theory decouples er , Received: symmetries pap U sup e/ from Extended near-horizon ED iv using holes Publishing N ch A n. duli ar k osonic t/ of tons, b .i arising blac mo ssa near-horizon Strominger Physics The Instan space . . of This ersymmetries and hole N duli 4 http://jhep.si separated sup -symmetry Andrew mo holes. 4 oles R spradlin@Princeto and k symmetry , . and u the Institute y widely ed blac admit vit Monop SU(2) t by on osons of rd. b × to University radlin va d ergra N Sp 3 ar wn hanics erconformal hanics multi-black sup Solitons SU(2) sho 2 rcus Harvar du USA sup Published mec is mec tains = and Ma d.e near-coinciden 0) con , Holes, N 1; tum rmal tum 02138, k h holes , of Physics, (2 k of MA D quan Blac whic Quan 2002 blac Maloney symmetry teracting, [email protected] the ct: h ords: erconfo artment -symmetry ultiplet R enhanced whic Dep [email protected] Cambridge, E-mail: SISSA/ISAS erm c ° an the conformal strongly-in Keyw p in Nordstrom dimensions Abstra Alexander Sup JHEP04(2002)003 , 2 3 5 7 4 9 4 1 2 k 4 7 k µ 11 17 15 12 dd. not Φ = four con- o errell blac e F ]. N b actions. 8 N ultiplets required y , hole ulti-blac b 4 an 7 clearly m constrained k , can erm the the ypically ultiplets is = [6 a ago of T of ects Reissner-Nord- es sup blac in erm N 1 giv space This exp of sup = space decade 1 static duli space N This comprise a = extremal duli ordinates space. class explored goldstinos. mo er the co v N , mo duli as o therefore y space these are oson. the N b 3 vit mo target the real of fermionic One ered general duli is ultiplets v the N arising the a m 3 ergra ultiplets y real mo problem b together m on disco algebras sup auxiliary space N en as 2 four-dimensional this dimension to hole an – w fermions tak = of coupling 1 k construct the near-horizon target N – y and N ving, 4 ersymmetries. fermion structure b to that ects with space blac actions apiece, in the sup w space 1 parameterized with Asp t whose ecause duli of with erconformal the used = b sho is wly-mo puzzle ]. oson fermion hanics 5 e b duli mo complex del eigh N edded slo , sup er, b W a t 4 and hanics this 1 then mec mo ev , mo N space one the this metric em w e ysical limit [3 = is actions of mec transformations arian of ho d ph on tum in v h imply and duli hole symmetry symmetry sigma in of resolv space tum k When one a mo transformations four fermions. e whic quan algebra ould hanics e w is ) ]. metric w N duli 2 α quan 4 2) instance, er | ersymmetry fermion This , mec discussed 1; near-horizon mo (1 [1 , ersymmetry ersymmetric taining The holes is pap ulti-blac and preserv sup (2 this one . ultiplet, k 3 duction tum duction con m Osp The The D Conformal Conformally Sup Sup 4 ts m in erconformal erconformal R h this construction = blac 4 tro tro in osons puzzle quan ten solutions. Eardley eac In 2.2 2.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 3.1 3.2 The In The A N Sup Sup b ersymmetries ersymmetric = taining In , . . A ossible . . . . . N ψ This p 3 sup figurations con N sup and holes 2 hole strom 1. The Con 1 B A 3 5 4 JHEP04(2002)003 , ) e y 3 w ]– of in to en α w tly su- the ap- [9 duli ears who pla 1; (2.1) (2.2) mass sho 2 other giv , wn of hanics in states. theory ], One e torsion theory mo of (2 app = distance . tegrated [1 space enden therefore W sho section are the D symmetry mec in ell N ter ears is the separations e ound although In with sector are , duli tial b rotations desic are indep cen tum app hanics for while holes. metric. mo pure semiclassical geo Eardley space oten k hole symmetry ahler the describ p mec osonic of limit. quan states k near-horizon osons the b the ordinate e of spatial b blac duli and h w er-K¨ erconformal results 3 dt co so and of ) blac estigated tum actual the the 4 R 1 ersymmetry mo v yp Einstein-Maxw rotations, Suc − sup of h is dimensions in of has ψ the errell . sup h e quan solutions that limit 0) F ) small, − 4 review metric erconformal 2 eak errell-Eardley dimensions. auxiliary een fiv 1; ordinates) size. w y F w section b , F (1 = near-horizon near-horizon b whic limit ectrum. in co ectrum hole sup e − , (2 theory − the sho v In first N four sp the spacetime sp k the its D = 0) e R whose remain this their this ha ork ( in generators w to 1; of A errell-Eardley widely-separated g w 4 , the will blac y In F to the theory 5 when and − erconformal from state (2 of e admits near-horizon vit four-dimensional √ – ell pioneered w D and atures conformal , x SU(2) sup The size. 2 that or 4 in energies 2 3 solutions as dified extension. d ound – x space arises ergra t Related near-horizon end w w curv section b d the hanics and 2 ect Z extremal . lo mo corrections 0) space h their ψ compared sup all In t hole π understand holes therefore is duli the the of 1; 1 mec this exp 2 A + to spatially k , generalization enhanced 16 k to sections 2 e whic o of mo = (2 spaces a and duli and is = structures. T an dt (in of W small D tum in 2 blac is N alid. Einstein-Maxw space requires M − metric symmetry v the hanics. mo ersymmetric of ork duli E has ψ of in state e are e ulti-blac ects w near-coinciden S quan b − ersymmetric consideration. y duli infinite m sup mo mec compared h a metric = asp states. to space complex 4 harged an ]. hole geometry this sup mo 2 c theories understanding a theory from separation of therefore whic k = describ tum [17 hole ds h under for on h for small static duli dimensions, in dimensions. solutions e the subgroups ound k space ected Some N is remains erconformal suc w -symmetry b suc N mo consider quan ork ]. 3 R holes 2 role oulos exp of triplet of blac ation action hole w four sup the duli theory k to the is ordinate k study admits ey holes hole SU(2) ] of the decouples extremally ulti-blac in 0) ]–[16 k y function the the co k k [4 mo to a 1; blac m y motiv ersymmetry e horizons near-horizon blac vit further of , that apadop v section y ],[13 a has the e P blac vit form (2 of 4 example Related osonic theory study w Sup the geometry een een , h h The pla see In One W D wish b role construct erconformal ergra The ximation G. w w an ]. [3 the e ulti-blac e et e ergra et y y will The m w sup b 2.1 sup has that the considered whic arises The will of b b p space geometry b in completely out. [12 pro whic the 2. W The This b JHEP04(2002)003 . e e | is − 1 ell ed ell an x A The w form (2.8) (2.4) (2.7) (2.5) (2.6) (2.9) (2.3) tains holes x or | − . hole F k A x , the effectiv effectiv con dropp | the k x . ¸ definition e ) ) is , that blac b es m/ B the 4 blac the v ψ (2.6 + tak of can theory x × 1 This 3 Einstein-Maxw ψ A d ositions ates Eardley’s = require ell v that p ( ) form Z extremal e · the metric x duli. π ( ) extremal W and of 1 motiv fact and ψ B 16 . mo r the 2 function A − useful × Ω . m d errell are single = A 2 4 expands case F r where ery # a ( L m v | h , ) , geometry A t − geometry Einstein-Maxw attraction + of A | and x holes in A 2 2 | A finds harmonic masses (2.2 L of whic A , − m k B x unexplained) dr A 3. v v + L x A ) 2 ysical , in | − m j space the one 2 ´ 2 m − blac B ) , x with ph form 1, | ) r ∂ in A 1 m A (2.2 A (and X A – v vitational 1 geometry cities ³ v duli Ai X ( " ¿ | = A the the 3 ∂ teractions. ) the (2.2 X | A solutions x ) + j − elo 1 l gra B – 3 mo in holes of the of 2 j m v + r i, x d es = · m 1 k dt ² 0 − dy A y curious Z solution hole 2 A and tak k X o = L b hole r x ´ limit limit | π a ( k 1 2 ) blac mi small 1 k r solution for 1 2 ² m y x 16 is indices ( = · ositions b ³ N + this blac near-horizon − p ψ four-b B L It j l − metric 3 B δ holes = In m r . i k static = the | repulsion replaced the . the 3 δ A A k L and ulti-blac ( A 2 aluated r the spatial l is N r m single defined m | limit els B , us 1 us ev ds the ) dy . blac v near-horizon function x is . th o = and Th A,B X . lab the Ak the , , (2.7 2 electric at ) v A the the 1 A . | r ψ N x 1 in action limit for , of = x es around x . (2.3 the is A,B X 3 . hole of three-b d ) ) ell B 1 2 y . and giv − , 2 tial t , k harmonic b ] v 1 Z consider x limit A, = A ( dy that | a (2.5 [1 x o . π en one 3 O L near-horizon oten = blac 2 8 analysis of = for p − S enden If giv first o-b fact 1 to A r = x w × t ψ t near-horizon similar the The us 2 This ¿ in wn = | terms a indep L B A action cancel. 2.2 lagrangian kno lagrangian Einstein-Maxw with where where is r in Let where only AdS extremal The of x and JHEP04(2002)003 . a a ], h of B to x is this this in tum [18 oson with (3.2) (3.4) (3.1) (3.3) tains Suc when osons ers b define erfield , → of in b b triplets e ected con A quan N sup in W transform there x one um h oulos 3 n . exp constructed ultiplet erfields for hole , m feature M the whic are µ osons t extension. tains k 4 osonic ˙ four-dimensional sup -symmetry then b harges to Φ of equal b apadop µ R 1 = Accordingly ersymmetries P con h A erc blac ansatz i are the the dimension ortan = regions ]. h N ters ie The eac sup . sup of N and the [18 the − imp 0 one flat , space — with addition whic hanical B en es A del = four the A in b Ψ actions ersymmetric in d An ersymmetries of dt } encoun Ψ iθ t D mo es mec Coles cally D er duli brok h iθ mak B , sup include sup fermions. + lo duce A ev of − fermions un 4 reduction i eac constrained A w I mo en to {Q arian one tum d tro = v symmetry a dθ iψ sigma real usually = are — preserv Ho fermions the in 1, In R that ultiplets N = = ) A to from brok µ . − quan N are the m , hole Ψ A in Φ 4 one found D i an complicated. (2) ersymmetry first A d Ψ N (2.2 fields to k dt – Q Since , four is ψ e i as . in SU 4 ected sup . theory − closely W holes. . SU(2) – , bined hence asymptotically quite , blac . an th , The = and k fermion exp 1 admits , ysical 0 d dt µ ws . 2 ultiplets µ tly A ) y λ = is exotic com ect solution λ ph -symmetries. D and iθ m hanics. still Ψ blac i the erspace iθ the R vit A follo 1 t + (2.7 is second extra µ sligh exp are − the i mec and sup e only for d = µ hole, construction A dθ , the N 1 and rather ergra ery + k that ersymmetric X d es dt v = N ν space = i tum noncompact, fermions, = osons sup These Φ This further sup Q ecause blac with = ativ b µ whose N of 4 D b e 2 real a Φ ν duli realizes er w quan Ψ transformations = sounds µ case. Q differs p ersymmetry i ersymmetries, in real N I deriv t doublets. mo near-coinciden D from 3 along doublet erly ected = sup sup in 2, to ten are ecial erspace. fermion. demonstrate the µ — existence of e = A exp map Φ ultiplet sp ersymmetry and con i b prop of w sup t ond a notation rotations, is erspace N Q h fermions the . goldstinos 4 erm consider sup ysical as in ersymmetric and is sup field usual our e = 4 ey fermions ersymmetry fermion osons ph µ sup whic remaining w and b four sup section corresp ob X = spatial N the treatmen geometry the to one h Sup This edded the usual hanics is N extension the b this single -symmetry µ osons or lead an em in 3. In geometry under whic The These and F and a b R section manner singlet fermion using mec although Our Φ where the 3.1 JHEP04(2002)003 , 4 y y r is to b ζ the = ). (3.9) (3.8) (3.5) (3.7) (3.6) y most same man (3.12) (3.11) (3.10) where b terest. N are erfields This easy e in v 3, the (3.11 , ts The algebra is t , sup j i . ha t δ of . It A 4 . generated B A accomplished , onen δ is 0 = 3. t. curren case). , are = part are N 2 = N t , , of erfields constrained A , . comp 1 structures. j parametrized r define . 0 t B ecial . , ) e = ersymmetry sup , i r ). goals case = 0 , sp 1 i e duce θ 4 enden W constrain ( erspace 1 } , sup = onding s = d , dt = a (3.8 ). enden tro the − ρ A our r D A sup A ν y y in , complex with these in N Ψ iθ µ the r b b Ψ N 4 , -indep ) r (3.1 r , e i i to of − . as I ij A Q θ Ai to b = er {Q than Q and . ( t corresp -indep in δ r r r i . b as The Ψ ordinates ζ A y B d ζ θ , j N i transformation N to N δ dθ 0 the δ co 3 = um pair = i Both , close The in = , n I = = + satisfied . A to . A ) j efficien } . earing r s . ). s , . in Ψ i in B Their Ψ , Ak D Aj , ζ is I ζ r µ are ρ D A the δ 1 ˙ δ generalit algebra. (3.4 index Φ ) ts δ , – ). Φ app ) i (3.4 it r dimensional r transform of erspace D e ij 5 = ) θ = ( k θ A iδ j N – , the µ t, ρ and ersymmetry , (3.6 i ordinate. sup 3 ( t, reduce , Ψ , more − ² A −{D ( ) d i A µ d dt µ co dt is A h e r sup to = = Φ = requires s , Ψ actions Φ A r r constrain Ψ with uc r and iθ (3.2 0 when µ ) A d i iδ Q dt transformations Aj uting m Q µ µ uis e r + 2 = s ersymmetry r Ψ ts and Φ i ζ space r Φ need ζ and r i (3.7 in + B = ) that D iδ d these erspace ) e conditions r = D ρ A sup = dθ t 2 } θ θ ν ) w s µ i transformations i index µ Nijenh t, I t, I = ticomm sup = Φ Q h ( (and ( ( ν Φ target the ζ , } r µ µ 1 µ ζ infinitesimal an r δ erfields s i the ersymmetric absen constrain δ the Φ Q the A] I actions Φ ey closure Q y = the are whic ersymmetry an {Q , − plugging er is sup , sup r ob v if the are conditions ts ) y ts N k i the sup j b I i {Q of endix the er, ( ² ) emplo reco erfields oldface t The A B Under ev replaced onen N 1, e b δ The that . app to terms usual w . e (3.4 sup − W , . Q = v in i ho construct 1 constrain e D k N ha ≡ comp [18 the ers d/dt solution B , ey where = wish ersymmetric v to ≡ 0 e . is in , . = Aj constrain 0 e the , w i Q automatically ob . ˙ ) directly N r i θ w , D reco I h h Sup If 0 k Q ossible, denoted ear ( erfields. all the ≡ order simple teresting = y 0 hec fermionic imp One for b app with A whic where in where r whic where the c 3.2 are usual In θ sup JHEP04(2002)003 the and The that (3.14) (3.16) (3.15) (3.17) (3.18) (3.23) (3.24) (3.22) (3.25) (3.21) (3.20) (3.19) ) (3.13) that see + . + e ρ ] ¸ (3.12 find ) terms. w Φ C ν e tegrating ) n [18 ts D Ψ Φ w . in ν 2 B , ) Φ D e , =0 as Ψ L i and 1 (3.12 D θ A n and µ D terms f Am C Ψ µ ativ Φ ˙ ∂ ¶¸ ), Φ C ν Φ constrain j rom D m ] 3 the the ˙ ρ i F Φ B AB δ uting l D µ deriv ∂ µν k . to [ (3.17 the c 1 3! Φ + Al , m in 1 ∂ Aj 3! ν tains of D constructed L + iδ i l ´ 2 e Φ l i ed + B (total B 1 δ + + b ticomm con ∂ using , − A n Ψ D ρ ν + j . A an w 3 A L Ψ A Ak terms ) Φ Φ m n µ indices Ψ D y ∂ Ψ k k ² =0 no Ψ ˙ Φ ) C i µ b µ Φ absorb ( θ j D D ∂ D | l − j Φ Φ ν L k action µA m , 2 F m and j . D can D i m j Φ ² i θ B D if L i , and µ j δ space ² 4 µ ∂ L form D – n n d + k D L Φ i − Φ + − . C mk l Al i 6 j µAB µ B ρ quadratic = ² ² ∂ ν ∂ dt L B B ∂ D = – duli Φ m k =0 Φ n ∂ m k i for i Φ action F parts + + Ψ erspace 3 n θ Aj 1 Z 3 C i B ij 2! l h the j j Aj D Ai i y ² ∂ mo D D ∂ ∂ ² δ k 2 1 . D i ∂ µ ν m b dθ j 1 2 Φ A k 2 i + k sup m ij q µ Al ij k j δ off Φ ² m ² Φ R Ψ B = µ D ∂ ˙ ² δ ( A i 3 q ρ symmetric 2 1 the Φ D l ∂ µ action ² i i Ψ p S i l D D D AB = = = l ² ,µν ν Al Φ j ,µν 2 i er µ = p ² h 1 n ∂ read L j v L ² Φ D − −D 1 2 Φ o h pq D 1 Using more 1 AB 1 D 3! ( mn tegrated ² + N AiB mn ersymmetric pq j l D µ = = h . AiB − a ³ · f D ² ² ² i can in g ρ ,µ ,µν Φ ν θ µ 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 run e an in ˙ Aj L L sup D Φ Φ ,µν w µ dtdθ een A 3 Φ = = = = N 4 + + L i parts: to ) b 3 Φ ersymmetric D h µν k , C C C D Z = 2 y three D j . n C k b j 1 2 . D action 1 sup AB has D µν . 2! 1 N AiB ) l (3.15 dtdθ , g AiB the = D 1 AiB i m 2 n + c the Z · er S reduced = and 1 2 v (3.14 term are o e ) ρ general , Φ b of = dtdθ ν write D i S Z y manifestly µ, Ψ (3.12 terms line can 6= most D = A ma k e S tegrating W third for in where The This Using The cubic JHEP04(2002)003 e ) a to ts. our and One that (4.5) (4.1) (4.2) (4.3) (4.4) (2.7 ) (3.26) ely µ receiv onen restrict algebra λ , Compar- implies only dification computed µ ectiv . parametri- will will erconformal metric L X mo comp ν ulation. µA e ( Although this ˙ a f resp w X of this sup . µ transformations. ˙ form — . X space ). that 4.3 requiring ) the ersymmetry µν holes. , , With function . terms i iK g of 1 ultiplets onding e 2 k signifies ˙ K y duli ² (3.6 coupling sup (3.14 seen in m 2 K = ² an e is mo ] i² section blac b conformal and − the the out This the D action i lagrangian for = 2 , y in ˙ corresp closure N . I ), ² the of 2 action b ν 1 algebra t can K ² [ ˙ of the K X ² . with under the it µ = ultiplets δ the only (3.26 ) µ in ˙ ) . ] K with written X 4 A ² 2 ) m y of b ² 2 ork , generic ˙ ψ b ²D t , , quadratic transformations. AB w hanics 2 1 x 1 are A , (3.8 (3.18 h ² 3 extension + iH en [ tirely transformation ψ parameters d ersymmetric B i + to D 2 the , action D ν with e mec en D ersymmetry µ µ − giv – f Z separately t² ˙ λ ue ariance rom i² sup 2 X 7 , v = L transformation π F µA the ² fermion out, ork ersymmetry sup µ 4 erfields ork 1 ] and where f = – tin + in tum y − 16 w w t conformal i X in D b = H ( 2). I to , D sup − sup = the ² con ² with conformal 2 K H and N y form µ > estigate quan e erconformal [ of will = δ will , with = b ] v a ) ecial infinitesimal the 2 X form e e ) W L A ² N in t ,² fields tegrated t are that earing w sp w b the sup δ ( and 1 conformal , ² ² in ] ) satisfy [ k as , , a ortional A δ es D ) [9 once the hoices will app 4.2 under the ψ H and , c = hec are , e iD A ) of of µ H tak c b ] µ (3.18 required H familiar (3.4 w long prop − A 2 constan section. µ λ i² ² X b and ˙ , to δ ersymmetric = X µ , = symmetry vior ecific (3.19 that and (as ] the 1 are hoice ² that X µA 4.1 c H ) estigate sp δ ard ( K sup field ² f [ metric es v eha K , fields algebra δ is ble ² 4 parametrize b in dilatations ) H the previous [ transformations the tak tribution the e (3.13 = R metric generators to tforw , this form fields the w and nonzero t of space to resem con N (2 the , ersymmetries sections of that the is D the the SL ² in auxiliary ) In will the duli sup tion osonic , enien algebra of straigh actions v erconformal on b h H ed section ). es the estigate is ² the mo A ariation v define (3.21 the translations, b con v Conformal It The atten the , e in extra elop conclude Sup additional this the is A w e e ψ our ( the consequence When from algebra dev approac ing an describ It The In coupling w then W where of 4.1 4. If zation time JHEP04(2002)003 ) y e ). b In on b ψ ts, b do er- , , that with (4.8) (4.6) (4.7) (4.9) ). ψ X to terms define , t sup ( i w utation A e satisfied 1 λ in (3.4 , w G required i is = (not relation follo constrain ), A X ) ) and ( λ transformations ˙ N y , ψ B ) ticomm b − (4.2 X same fields ( an requiremen the ariations µ endix (3.2 = t fields transformations v conditions fields. b F endix 0 This app The additional the conformal as Q defined the onen algebra ). app . in orating µ basic no ) 0 required just D case R long iS es , , comp (see general − four as (2 ib the 0 = giv µ this ersymmetry 1 erfields) incorp ersymmetry ersymmetries − ] 0 the 2) SL X , , | y 0 outlined ey ( In , the is . more = , b b 0 sup sup = sup ψ Q (1 consider atze sup A A on ob µ ] ij , 0 of Q ). ψ ij the 0 0 δ A on ˙ iδ K ²G 2) ˙ satisfied ˙ the ans¨ b S ²F [ ²H the = | es the Osp Q , and 2 1 , , fields + 1 2 2 1 − complicated. is µ cedure A r (1 t ). k that K act consider of k ψ + [ the F + + ativ Q , λ ψ ˙ – h r X µ k , . pro A e , µ Since ks A ˙ Osp , k λ i 8 ˙ more i ˙ index ij iζ λ b ψ X , onen i ˙ λ ² ˙ ij ² ² ² ( express include µ could – generators ˙ relation X deriv hec to = the X i A − i² − whic hoice − − − mak algebra c X i c ( to ζ this ) G e relation ), δ − one ======relations will comp the R w of , transformations j j b , or time µ e = A ψ A these i wing y λ i b λ somewhat (3.9 i ) w i X (2 ψ easily ² b ² The Q the i ² Q algebra λ δ δ Q X unique δ 0 the es 0 ollo parameters. Q SL algebra ( ) ). fields, F that on µ Q S suppress utation A R One necessary on ecome , . the functions D ψ ativ the b the 0 it (2 . ). − will uting Q on erify are , end H X e A SL comm v i ersymmetry ( discussion s that find w A r G µ λ e ( δ erderiv H dep to implies 0 v − A 2 D ks algebras the sup ti-) remaining enlarge generator o generators not µ r ticomm = iQ = sup of to ab and hec not 2) X (an i ard | } an c the = field s r A X shall index the do on 0 A Q these Q G restrictions or the e , are enlarge ) wish 0 F , Q r w H tforw Osp(1 b of µ r the . , transformation easily w Q ζ ector iQ F µ e with { v X the , with first no ( D erconformal = µ olv remaining the A one of ] e e y D v 0 straigh action H W W sup in requires Q an some Although additional generators the is 1 , A D for Again for confused of where and closure analogy where so [ no not and It symmetry ψ The the relations JHEP04(2002)003 t y b the ears only eral- with (4.12) (4.14) (4.11) (4.10) (4.16) (4.15) (4.13) exam- ansatz find app sup ultiplets that constan e h m k the first olving W 1 v e the e generated together hec in . whic c ) W = is for A mak to h efore. ). G N e (3.4 b A w appropriate action iµ done . (4.9 whic as only if e algebra the ρ and e i 0 b the Φ ) − of iS ) = D µ to ν A µ A = (3.2 , will i Φ in general iµ A ] out ) e i i e D ) remains µ e µ Q ) , β restrictions. λ + , it symmetry β Φ This A requires subalgebra, + A , − most K urthermore, A D ψ [ ersymmetries ) i + R . b . ν iµ A F ρ D e λ 1) y 0 actions A 2) D together 2) L | µν b , D ( ,ν sup ψ The L c 0. t as + the further = i µ µ ( (1 + µ L (4.10 1 6 . 1) ˙ ( utator. β S µ = D X β D endix µ ( of = A ˙ ( ( ˙ A ² + ² – + ˙ ˙ i ² ² Φ ν Osp ψ transformations + long arian 1 2 A 1 2 ν e µ 1 2 9 1 2 β v then ) µ i ˙ app ( A Φ − i algebras I + – β as − in e µ β + − ψ − ν the define without D ) r i in µ extended ticomm r tation A Φ t λ + µ A β ˙ e ˙ L ) = ˙ ˙ 2) X ψ λ b erfield of 2) D an iQ | ν D ws | ² ² ² ² actions W − A the } w. iµ L (1 µν − − − − = (1 . 1 s ( G D sup I g i S i A 2 follo elo L D = = = = = , ersymmetry ( constan b of Osp ψ r represen L outlined Osp ] µ µ the A A ( closure i orate requires = N i Q b λ ψ conformally ] sup N X ² ² { Q y dtdθ ² 4.3 ν ² t δ δ , + δ b alue δ µ some i [18 v µ Z D with algebra I the [ the cedure incorp h X i is D = 1. i these for algebras arian of L algebra 2) 1 to | 0 v pro eac − section iQ that S start (1 in construct is = required knit N = the in side for find , the us e A ) µ . w e µ of Osp w ), . e i i X . transformations w step couplings erified v e ] separate no , i S ) Let v (3.8 appropriate 1 , A wing β ha the i Q e . N t-hand ψ , v ust = A Q − an of next , i D ollo m case Ψ closure ha ust [ section conditions on D F the righ K in h e e e m L , ( rest e Conformally W The W conformal D the and lie eac the this that , w and r µ H the The that Acting so Φ ( so gebra. Q satisfy for In dimensionless ine on 4.2 I JHEP04(2002)003 ) Us- used terms (4.22) (4.18) (4.17) (4.19) (4.25) (4.24) (4.21) (4.23) (4.20) under (4.20 closed ). guaran- requires a ρ who additional additional conditions λ as ν ], term not (4.17 e λ , an [9 ρ assume . es σ fiv in wn is The e λ µν A of , this do ρ c w ρ Ψ µ , λ kno are ν four-fermion λ ν of ts. µ ν Φ λ ˙ ¨ ²D is λ terms X µ i 4 D second µ µ ) λ the µ λ authors transformations there + Φ σ ρ,σ ¨ ²D the ρ λ D 2 ] 1 ˙ ariance µν dilatations (4.21 . ρ the A X constrain c v 0 ν + calculations 1 6 µν arying and y µν in λ c ν v ), b = n fermionic µ ˙ and − , 2) 2 1 find X . λ ρ us ] included under ρ ) µ − σ ρ e conformal ˙ − µν ˙ + λ X (4.16 c X is w further and Th C µν , ] ρ further ν D µ B ariance c found ) ˙ Ψ 0 λ A v L (4.20 X µν Ψ D Finally µ b 2) no B all g ecial [( action in A = λ es. ρσ . K σ Ψ iθ ρ − 2) ν sp Ψ µ – (4.17 In A ˙ osonic µν µ Γ ²∂ those ∂ µν + D the − g ativ Ψ b c , eying Φ in 1 L 10 + i A 12 = 2 C 0 D of 2) giving D lagrangian [( ν ob – ˙ µ L ² ˙ iψ λ = + ∼ − under AB with the i ), 4 deriv [( l µ ] D group. ˙ ρ ² dilatation µAB ν D 1 6 symmetry = ¶ = D terms 4 1 ∼ λ σ y µν L ν m t ( c + b λ A λ ariance (4.23 2 1 ¶ ∼ ρ D t erspace total v 2) ρ Ψ B λ µ ˙ field D ariance ¶ + ν in of Ψ X − v ν iλ precisely λ to sup ν A ˙ D µ D In λ X separately + Ψ A conformal λ µ µ L µ conformal . o-fermion up ν required ( ˙ Ψ λ the ector ˙ y ˙ X Φ ρ,σ ρ w ultiplet v X agree is y t full general AB to µ µν µν µν m full µA fields ) A ˙ c g c h that in X t i if 1 1 6 2 2 2 1 [ the the . consider for add µ − − − µν consequence + K (4.23 ² equalit or g µ δ ν that onen homothet to F = 1 2 ² formalism. λ as δ can fermion t condition a 2 t under dt and find requires L D is µ ) es Note e comp that Z one requires the hold. λ required first µ w . enien denotes function y ) giv of t = D µν v ) anishes g ) 1 (4.21 the ∼ v ariance i that 2 S ariance v con ), v h (4.21 µ When hamiltonian (4.14 that some in ² terms in is (4.17 addition δ Again, ing It where where so in In whic i.e. in dilatations for terms constrain (4.20 homothet the tee and JHEP04(2002)003 y = ti- the the r find an S e (4.28) (4.26) (4.27) (4.31) (4.30) (4.32) (4.29) } y for s W b S quote e , homothet v r , Q ha { k e algebra defined . X w simply k closed the find /h , t, ij a 2 generators. ² are e i − i will − h w h . 2 of age R e i s k transformations. = r w λ − , ) i β b constan whic ¶ ψ pac so − ij 1 , y ij erconformal T , is index, r b ( addition, to i − tδ itδ symmetry S . h 4 h A X that sup , 2 w h existence in µ + , − i R , − , A h s ultiplets µ 2 k ) , k i no conformal C if, the whic ir λ , ˙ e A i + A m the full µAB ² + X k ν − , is related 2 AB h R k i AB f 1 2 i ij µν vided ij s µA m l h ˙ e µ λ ij ˙ r δ calculation, n f = t² t X ) b + 2) 2) 2) Ai A i ∇ B and under e pro 2) 2) it it² − − generators δ part ,µ + v ]0 + + + X , t − s ν – o T + + ust assume = = = = δ 2 = h ( β β β y A D r appropriate mix [ ab m β β fermion j b j j b e ν 11 i ψ ( (2 ( (3 (2 1) i = µν µAB B ) λ i hard δ suppressing A h i X arian – W S i n A i S + form v ∓ the m = = = = = ( h i e S the Ai . S ν µ e h in e the A transformations = C D with = (4.25 and to D D µA 4( w the AB s ,, µν again µ f defined r µAB -symmetries h erconformal AB β in ) n = = l A A no D + and i D R m i , § D D s e L 0 0 has L is I D r T defining sup and L L ψ D ( δ L t that µ y hanics , similar L the ¶ ), D b A j terms endix dilatation 1 i the is conformal e matrices see = X 2 − utator (4.9 i mec µA out t e } h app are L 2 f 2 s h ² form find w ) constan δ ecial S µ in + ) , and Since ork to j r , sp of tum , and + ) . ˙ w j nice Q X ˙ ticomm is h (4.25 constan ψ with A { e a itb tλ it t (4.13 t an ) (4.8 w µν − − − − quan to n } are under step ) S in = = = = (3.8 t i terms § with discussion α j j b T the ψ Q, 0 λ Using 1; 0 constan first calculation { X 0 S , section 0 S the case arian ]. The S the form S (2 v utator that K the er in D The The , some p r this the ecial Q [ and that Note comm result. where As Comparing for i In 4.3 sp of JHEP04(2002)003 a ’s of (3) the the Q with (5.2) (5.1) come (4.35) (4.34) (4.36) (4.33) (4.37) SO of of is subgroup y four an ust admits m ) rotations as theory The metric Aj , (2.7 . diagonal relations ij X y y δ the SU(2) homothet , b spatial 1 2 space the vit ) k the y − b Q (3) limit k = on ergra closed duli ij defining second } ersymmetric SO ² . j defined § a act k § sup + T mo sup , the the − 0 the R 2 i § k generated R 4 Q T so ij , as = ij { , ) , hanics i² δ = ) are admits l k from ψ + j The ∓ N = near-horizon L ( ij R X it m j ] N mec δ i k 2 ² , B 4, j § k (4.36 if . ij ∂ ∓ k the ² § = R 1 an = mi k , T Ai ] arising ² 1) tum rotations j λ k – − In , ∂ SU(2). i § under l k and i ij D Q + ij k ∓ near-horizon h R as × ² ij λ [ , 12 ) j l y that ² G − i 2 i − § δ (1 ( . b quan – i k i i 2 2 R § 0 = = spatial δ limit. [ = the symmetry l en SU(2), ] (4.31 harged α , SU(2) = = = = B the = j § 0 h original of l 1) j j b giv is T Ak ψ ij k unc , λ i § g SO(3) , = X i § − symmetry G i eac i § § i ] R i § the that R are T h R j − Q [ are of R i − 2 that R of theory , parameter demonstrated recognize Ai § = i + SU(2) ws near-horizon e e X , = R v [ α this ] sho 0 W 0 with symmetry the ha 1; this satisfy of doublets = , Q The . generators e ] , in (2 j w demonstrate i § − 2 . -symmetry D T R e analysis , [ R i w + terpret T has eralgebra in [ complex similarly (2) theory ) e -symmetry symmetries symmetry careful ’s as w ). sup symmetry SU R S ) R R satisfy erconformal section . so conclusion, 0) α (3.13 + i § more the the (4.28 R 1; 1; the T the the In original , , A Sup + this us 2 (2 (2 − the transform triplet, where Th R D action The and from D and and In form 5. JHEP04(2002)003 t ), so to at the not ), (5.8) (5.4) (5.7) (5.3) (5.9) (5.5) (5.6) holes (5.1 is in (5.11) (5.13) (5.12) (5.10) Ai enden k tain 2 x δ if of ( 0 L ) tribute > con L blac | 1 indep L A − con that x λ (4.20 is erator the in 1 y − = op of not L ) x find | es Ai e tial . terms w | none do λx that ( B 0 us x . cutoff homothet L . 4 that a − ) a that other note # Th 4 differen δ | | x i.e. is | A A ln 3 1 all x | x the 1, A 1 D A − vided , insert piece − − − m First, x of e t . (1 x K x as , K metric. | 0 AB | . − w since 0 2 1 0 (pro that r 2 h + 0 x x = L If − ) | 3 A = A ernel the X d = = Ai ergen 0 x degree k + x AB = terms. " x that 3 1 L r AB terms 2 L – (5.2 Z K to 2 d t 2 of h r ) pieces div → x j L 1) w o ln j L 3 the 4 A h t B a x 13 Z d w = D B + + ∂ 1) t m metric. − in and ∂ sho – B 1 i m as ergen Z Ai Ai Ai ) + L C A Ai 3 A m ∂ 2 ∂ to X l ergen π ∂ D out ∂ tribute the 3 A l tains − ij k Ai div 1 m = | Ai ij k π (5.1 ∂ 16 Ai m G A B x 1 div to L G x con ( con Ai 16 x 6= − B ( easy the X x function A 6= − − ( L homogeneous = X is A y from not − to x ) is | = is tially π separate it 1 an = y 0 1 Ai 4 es y l tribute ws e x k L 2 L us since − ( tion δ b satisfies do oten L L con ij that p = follo er, δ let v 2 o can that It us atten = L not w term t ) . K homothet singularit careful this l h δ ij instead es t k ( find e our t tells Moreo ln G b do e the see oin only but w − p o t). us ) 1 turn T for the th tegrable using w constan this in should (5.9 the theorem no are at er, e and an ansatz ev W us A metric. coinciden some that w x tegral where Let of Euler’s are i.e. the Ho so in most Our These and where and for homogeneous JHEP04(2002)003 ) y h a ), of the the an then duct Con- Since whic (5.14) (5.15) (5.16) (5.17) (5.18) sigma (5.14 vide (5.15 related for regions general ossesses comple- pro in 2. a ) case, consider, p K pro harges , the 0 Ai in flat = from hamiltonian erc x L more of precisely our ( will e-dimensional β features. L sup is the In should fiv theory (and the cally erify = for ] a computation part v function so lo ) erator the h for semi-direct space, , one this [19 to ersymmetric useful Aj op wing a B ard x the hold suc on of i j to and duli sup 6= is ) ard . osonic that of O the 1 limit. ( found er, b some A (follo K tforw − mo L H ] the us ev eigenstates. y Ak (4.27 = tforw tly This w 20 ∂ the has the Th an trivially h eys , solution Ho = of from straigh suggestion ob and asymptotically l 0). [19 for recen for non suggested B that ) 1 L A the AB 1; straigh 0 x , in 0 , r l the as space. as ) has . of is B near-horizon B 3 w (2 w → = acts Ai er hamiltonian K (4.26 arising regions holds It R Ak m x that D p that L pro normalizable It g duli 2 i ) + 3 A – the AB ), 2 t. of B the is as − r of space m studied ∂ H − story mo in 14 the eigenstates. ( k (5.5 B note SU(2) = transformations terms 2 1 as = – 6= (4.23 mi arian that X l w that A Ai duli ² the So v holes = B k group 2 D in hanics, 0 this, B of k notation) ). D ectrum mo of extra i.e. l similar = x L noncompact B eigenstates. symmetry sp discrete noted mec see A K hanics blac symmetry the Ak the completes (5.12 is fermionic the hole conformal o g t or ) (3) y y T it conditions ]). holds, R regions k b mec = b tum off , the ) SO j ). This [24 (2 ecial discrete discrete Ak where D erconformal us blac conformally state eigenstates cut that ], tum ∂ sp quan D SL i the that (4.21 ed ) Th field. to C nor (5.14 sup v [23 wherein of ]. the (2), ∂ . also w an l the i j quan ij k in ticipated holds. 25 of ]), K tial of O eha SU that the , of G sho ) in ground are near-coinciden an b state ector noncompact 22 )–(3.25 w 1 v 12 , of a to generate oten to , text − ell admits (as p with limit e eigenstates, k sho (5.16 [21 w v defined a [10 = (3.20 matrix these con action a mi w H 2) of ernel ariance ha | ² ground h as out K generator k t v in 1 definition no of that 2). , a onding | e the in action and remains es has e hole 1 v holes (1 the not , the ) of h It The W homothetic k k ha del erges eals turns SU serv es in a e blac div blac do sensible corresp K near-horizon whic tion rev (5.17 is where since w orthogonal It SU(1 of is function formal mo treatmen neither instead JHEP04(2002)003 a ), of in in as n w and kiw, gen- er (2 those result group ], b from and genera- Jac ork [29 Usp um eralgebra w U(1) The n ) R. × algebras ) ) in ¯ ¯ 3 ¯ 4 ¯ 2 n Rep. erconformal 2 4 ]. sup 2n k, , , 7 1 8 3 the 5 6 7 8 2 n ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ (4) adapted , 2 2 This ∗ sup [27 2 y ( 2 ( 3 4 n ears eralgebras ( equal eralgebra G02-91ER40654. conformal these b 1 ) The SO -symmetry R Spinor = of sup , app an sup R Headric the d e , (2 . DE-F i ) of part (4). n t subgroup, ] yp the Q SL M. (5) t ) (2 forms ersations. SO [26 R of ) of U(1) v tains U(1) U(1) osonic SU(2) , SO gran ossible Sp n b 2 (7) (5) (6) (7) (8) ( of × × × p osonic 1 semi-simple, explicitly × × con con × G ) b of oulos, U(1) harges n SL(2 part SU(2) SU(2) SO SO SO SO SO SO ( en the (2) tation -symmetry classical DOE (2) er erc has form an ev b R of SU(3) SU(4) SU of ) SU(2) SU algebras SU n sup algebras helpful and um apadop 2 osonic not tain | noncompact) n 8 classification P y ) b ∗ ) is n represen ≤ con dimensions (4 n 2 – ) G. h , 8 ) man N the f (i.e., , 1 3 algebras n some 15 6 4 Osp # that program + of , – fermionic = the noncompact whic for + as Nahm’s 3 classification b, 4 Lie real e 1) n a d spinorial + A N (9,8) (3,2) (6,6) (6,8) (4,4) ell (# 2), out − yp erconformal acumio, | (16,16) (17,14) (24,16) (13,10) (18,12) (24,14) (31,16) (12,12) (19,16) 2 + a t , is w 1 wship in n n 2 from , algebra ( ( K dim in n helson as simple arious n sup (1 v 1 2 off subgroup (2 fello ], sit ( 1 Mic The written SU and algebra. SU(2) K Britto-P real e classical , = the ]. v i J. of algebra × D 1) of d of the Q | R. t ha 2 ) [27 [ , 4 1 i 1 8 reading e R , of factored of H > ≤ tiate in , w > graduate = > y (1 2) a n y | y b (2 3) 4) 4) i ecially n <α generators 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) | | , | n b ts 1 0 , | | | | | | ) thank ear S ∗ , 1 1 SU ) , is ) quotien SL , , . n (8 (3 (5 (6 (7 (1 NSF α (3) (4) esp n (4 2) ) 1 2 | = closure | eralgebras to clarit | differen 1 F G app eralgebra R 1; ∼ = ∗ n erconformal , the , , ( 2) the Osp Osp Osp Osp Osp Osp or sup classification | Osp for (4 SU(1 SU(1 and (1 F PSU(1 (2 is y not Sup obtained table sup (4) also A b h ]. fermionic D Osp partners ∗ SU Lie SL(2 2) generated Osp is | in do wledgmen [27 vic 1 ) h pleasure Osp(2 construction SO 1: , the e R in a olo orted , h required W table. A results ears kno V generic whic is able in app whic our algebras the tors where PSU(1 fermionic SL(2 table T Ac It A. A supp A. JHEP04(2002)003 i it t, = of Q 2). use this | so part with 2) 1 (A.7) (A.5) (A.4) (A.3) (A.8) (A.1) | (A.6) (A.2) eigh , ], to w 2) (4 algebra | starting (1 1 family [28 harges , dimension SU Osp tisymmetric erc ersymmetries = of the an SU(1 symmetric throughout algebra sup 1) so literature sup of , the 1; the ij N , N e R tion isomorphic R b (2 duct ysics en t. D and fixes to the v one-parameter are generators ph with , e ) pro y v a α enien con , v erconformal tit ha that i − (4.4 the appropriate e 1 . iS con generators sup this form in ] − iden W − algebra fact t ij relation 1 the generator 5 fermionic ∞ = 1. R ij e most , . , = ] and v the algebra R semi-direct i 1 the ≤ d K 1 . the . adopt ) H S a enden [ − ha of Jacobi + i . i . i find − es α , , R ij e satisfy 0 0 e , 0 α δ common to on D D iS w = iQ < ) [ 2 w giv , – ust (2 ij = = ). 6= 0 α = indep δ = y ] K m ] = -symmetry erconformal i i ] ] N SL 16 one through general i α ij i i and (A.4 ( } = tit 1) R S Q δ i j – , a , Q Q , Q ecome 2 y } − sup reflection i , S , reduces the Q j SO b b the K H 2), trivially , [ a of [ 1 | − the ) iden i K S N D is appropriate iQ with [ [ 1 ( the , α } algebras i Q , = it j − ) non { has N 1; Q S α just d the most 2 1 of , { = parameters , i erators but It that y that ] 1; is define (2 defined i at , S Jacobi e, i is op { an S D PSU(1 algebra e satisfying with (2 , S acting tee t with most b tak 0, of D the This H family then K [ for at construction to e (2) the of → can 1). matrix. the W α are and SU guaran − the . y together route that e D algebras constrain algebra D N tit ), ( , ij k erconformal ersymmetry limit harges δ then there eralgebras only N extra H shorthand e 1 2 The hec iden consider erc sup (A.4 b sup c the a the application sup describ trivial the that to to tities In sup the as w the ust t the that not } most non Lie symmetry j y that m no is 2) 2). with b S iden | | at Note ws R real e , 1 ∗ so i e generators , first definition Another The W one b define er. Q eralgebras. N This 5 the { follo sufficien e can of The part, but Jacobi erated of holds. W The for sup It SU(1 with satisfying pap is Osp(4 SU(2), JHEP04(2002)003 c ) e e ). of K ab As W the R giv f con- (B.1) (A.9) (A.7 y t. strong (A.11) (A.13) (A.12) (A.10) er. y the dim( the Since tit tation b from , fermionic , pip . ery o application . v R enden . iden and w tisymmetric, , t the an 1 an of , as y = defined represen is indep algebra. , places , a ). summary pa ell tation . Jacobi e , ) w a iS D 0 b In to side Finally R as algebra = = = the spinor that . (A.11 ) i ] ] not } ) (A.10 a of S Q Q time S y represen , the t , generators (4.4 and in is K t-hand ) K Q, [ erconformal algebra. [ ma the e ), { (A.10 R the it , liv as or righ generators sup . of (2 w i ] t , , and y R c (A.10 j ij j Q c faithful. no SL , ) the , T the S Q R R e , of ma ), requiremen applications c j symmetry j , c i iS b i K ) the ab ) of enden ab ij D but iQ 2 − a (A.4 R a [ f reconstructed tains the erconformal R (A.6 – T if T while ust − = = = ( = ( e more i i generators ), tation rest m v j ] ] = that con the 0 17 } = indep sup o ] from S = Q ] = S ) b ha – is , effort, 2) b , = ] ↔ ] | the i the i R (A.3 ] R Tw e T S, D i the D ws , [ S that (1 [ , { ij Q . w general, a , ), a tation , ) of a are R a R represen T little , [ generators [ dim( follo In R j fixes Osp es R [ i [ H ) (A.1 [ ) of . it that under (A.9 1) , a giv eralgebra , ), R T with same ) − ( iQ represen , H separately question. of sup and 2 0 − (A.10 (4.4 N algebra Note far terms the ( ) in ts the = = = The (A.10 in N the in construction ] ] ). . } 1 2 so that anish c ij ). king symmetry S to Q (A.8 symmetric v Q , quite lie , on ab R R ), satisfying y the algebra R , f is H hec t H see theory the [ Q, [ c S constan (A.11 tit (2 ust { satisfy the ts 2) w from | e, the m j of i SL erconformal (A.10 v the side ) (1 no gotten o iden and a e on T sup ab Q with v ( sides constrain with help 1 necessarily requires Osp found completes rewrite constan ts ha shall i tation structure e = S the Jacobi v e e oth ute utes the b final left-hand N This W W ha tioned the The some i.e. the the e us , men so are represen for where W comm with of R comm constrain struction therefore The The B. The th generators JHEP04(2002)003 . d , , ev. ge 183 B R B in black ]. , B 17 J. holes Nuovo , char ett. (1999) onformal , L c ett. holes av. . ly Phys. Phys. (1980) L 1092 er 04 , soliton onformal black Gr chanics c ersymmetry sup er chanics on 129 me black Phys. chanics Nucl. holes sup , Phys. ersymmetric me , on Phys. (1998) Sup d , maximal me om . Quant. sup es gy (NY) of 57 hep-th/9810230 holes black [ of holes dstr e d ctions ometries D ctur and ]. quantum e Ener extende ge ge enc L quantum hep-th/9910028 wnsend, Phys. black ev. o black quantum , index h, R T 084015 . char with High interse alesc in Class. nn. hole cial vic o OKT , e c of A e .K. 427 J. eissner-Nor onformal , sp P olo , ane chanics Phys. dilaton R Witten a V hep-th/9911066 and (1999) ole , and one-dimensional d ]. , er)c me . chanics and A. very ge chanics es 59 and (1990) eme ]. the five-br hep-th/9706207 attering me algebr [ ac holes invarianc of (sup HKT 7 me D 1492 multi-black sc ]. monop o of and sp char extr opy ]. of attering al 623 Bueno – av. ly ev. of black sc quantum asor R duli entr . Gr Stelle, 18 (1986) erez quantum Vir mo ometry – chanic dynamics gy, onformal P ometry onformal (1997) c 1617 magnetic Multi-angle Conformal ge 57 c dy K.S. Phys. ge hep-th/9907191 motion the me maximal o olo er [ motion Strominger er , hole ]. Quant. The the J.C. op 1 ett. 508 hep-th/9908044 The sup [ for T A. and ]. L and The Sup The of urlan, ]. (1987) hep-th/9910160 B Slow ersymmetric and [ F hep-th/9407118 k, , many-b [ ]. 005 ev. and hendorff, oulos, 59 sup R (2000) G. oulos, oulos Quantum alizations four-dimensional esc metric e helson, 2826 of Phys. r T chanics Kallosh, e 2839 multi-black Class. ett. Izquierdo, of Rubac and 213 L , Eardley (1999) ac ar Mic symmetry me A. Phys. apadop ]. . .J. errell, Strominger, sp Strominger, apadop onformal , apadop and P al J. ev. F R.E. P Nucl. dels J.M. 09 hep-th/9205061 P P (2000) [ Conformal R , 569 ometry and ubini (1995) A. A. ]. Phys. G. D.M. er)c mo R. hep-th/9806191 F duli es attering ge limit G. [ G. 41 hep-th/9910022 nonline and and . [ 51 ac Sc S. 2628 and and Mo Phys. hep-th/0002007 and (sup and [ and chanics sp oulos oulos, Phys. 399 45 159 city and D acumio, The ons ons ons, Dynamic (1976) and Conformal , Math. gy sigma me Phys. Azcarraga, hen velo ev. duli wski ar 3715 errell kiw, (1992) R helson, helson helson Gibb Gibb Gibb Alfaro, Hull, A34 holes Ener Coles F de hep-th/9901139 mo (1993) (2000) (1998) apadop apadop [ rasc low P P Shiraishi, Wyllard, de Britto-P Jac 45 chanics Math. Mic Mic T Mic Guto Kumar, hep-th/9708091 402 472 [ Commun. High Phys. hole 443 D quantum the black me 006 J. (2000) nonline Cim. J. J. J. G.W. K. G. G.W. G.W. R.C. J. R. J. J.A. J. C.M. N. G. R.A. V. R. [8] [9] [6] [3] [7] [5] [2] [4] [1] [10] [12] [11] [13] [14] [15] References [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] JHEP04(2002)003 , 21 . , nn. holes anes A br . , 454 High Phys. tensor of ]. 149 B J. Black , en, ett. Math. L ey (1978) states J. volumes dilatations? , hep-th/9607161 Pro e , 135 Phys. ate typ ound as an , gy-momentum world b B V al hep-th/9804177 dels on [ A. gener ener algebr mo d Phys. er classic not o and 4553 ove sup of ger do Nucl. as impr symmetry Lie , Calo Two-black-hole (1998) wnsend ators on o h, new T algebr 81 and A er vic – ]. K. gener ett. . olo sup L 19 P Conformal esentations holes V kiw, – Lie ev. epr A. Dictionary en, Jac r R ey Black R. dilatation and Kumar, Pro their simple J. Phys. and . , Why an al hep-th/0004017 e Sciarrino, ]. and [ V 42 r wnsend, o . A. A. of kiw, T 050 Kallosh, Strominger chanics 552 Jac Coleman (1970) and .K. and me R. A. P ation R. 59 (2001) . S.R. (1971) and Sorba ersymmetries and 03 . Derix, Kallosh Jr., 67 P (NY) hep-th/9812034 Classific acumio, [ Sup ons . onformal R. M. c er, Phys. er 689 187 (NY) Gibb Phys. Callan ark Coleman gy sup rappat, Nahm, P Britto-P F Claus, Claus, nn. . . (1980) hep-th/9812066 Ener (1999) and Phys. A M. L. P W. R. G.W. P C.G. S.R. [29] [28] [27] [26] [25] [24] [23] [22] [21]