View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk arXiv:hep-th/0608130 v2 25 Sep 2006 studied. il hoisadi loseattetet nve fthis of view In SUSY treatment. the exact of allows extension it and theories Mills N usinhsbe tde ntecs fsprYn-il the Yang-Mills super derived, of been SUSY has case usual equation the the self-dual in of modified studied that been from has modified question is equation instanton its bee have superspace results model. NC Positive the on commutati of years. renormalizability few their theories last with field the in comparison SUSY extensively in of usua examined, properties the be turbative from to different need quite they properties have SUSY) deformed etrhvn efda akrudvlegvsrs osup to rise gives value with background gra theories self-dual its a with having theory sector th Superstring string coordinates. of superspace limits propertie or (NC) energy non(anti)commutativity low the to the due on in features D-branes, theories on field values quantum o background of If posses theories. to field components quantum field in development new about brought elzto fteN uesaecniee ndffrn con different in considered superspace NC the of realization 2 ntno qain o h Supersymmetric the for Equations Instanton eateto hsc n nttt fBscSine Sungk Science, Basic of Institute and Physics of Department ∗∗∗ ∗∗ htteisatneuto sntdfre ysprpc no superspace by deformed not is equation instanton the that tno qaini ossetwt h eomdequations deformed the sho with We consistent is dimensions. equation two stanton in superspace non(anti)commutative UYcase. SUSY 2 = ∗ ) ) ) tde fsrnswt o-rva lsia auso its of values classical non-trivial with strings of Studies N n o-etbtv su ndfre UYfil hoisis theories field SUSY deformed in issue non-pertubative One Cfil hoisadSS edtere nN uesae(fiel superspace NC on theories field SUSY and theories field NC -al [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: -al [email protected] E-mail: esuyteisatneuto ftesupersymmetric the of equation instanton the study We SUSY 2 = 8) auoh Araki Kazutoshi N 1 = CP nNnat)omttv Superspace Non(anti)commutative on aua ukok,Tko 1-51 Japan. 112-8551, Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Kasuga, 7) / 1 uesmer sa ffciefil theory, field effective an as supersymmetry 2 N eateto hsc,Cu University, Chuo Physics, of Department h ouin oti e efda qainhv lobeen also have equation self-dual new this to solutions The − CP 1 1 , oesi = hr aync rpriso ue Yang- super of properties nice many share d=2 in models ∗ ) N ae Inami Takeo , − uo 4-4,Korea. 440-746, Suwon 3)–5) 1 § .Introduction 1. oe oN superspace. NC to model 1 , ∗∗ 6) ) n iok Nakajima Hiroaki and n setne oteN deformed NC the to extended is and yee using typeset fmto.Te econclude we Then motion. of n(anti)commutativity. htteudfre in- undeformed the that w CP bandcnenn the concerning obtained n fsaeiecoordinates spacetime of s ihtnfil nteR-R the in field viphoton CP ) 9) 5), et oetm ago. time some texts rymti Yang-Mills ersymmetric edcmoet have components field ehv constructed have we , oy hyhv novel have They eory. N N re nd4 n the and d=4, in ories uka University, yunkwan ban e classes new obtains e the of some allows ne P − − edtere,and theories, field l 1 T edtere.This theories. field 1) h usual The aebe studied been have 1 eprnr.Per- partners. ve P im oe on model sigma hte n how and whether rvdn good a providing im Model Sigma T E hoiswith theories d 2 X.cls , ∗∗∗ ) h Ver.0.9 CP N 2) − 1 1 i provided byCERNDocumentServer brought toyouby CORE 2 model has a few interesting properties: It is integrable classically10) and its multi- instanton solutions are known. It is of interest to see whether these nice features are preserved after extension to NC superspace. In this letter we wish to examine the question of whether and how the instan- ton equation is modified when we extend N = 2 SUSY CP N−1 model in d=2 to NC superspace. In Yang-Mills theory, construction of multi-instaton solutions and integrability of its self-dual sector are apparently related.11) It is of interest to look into the integrability question of the deformed SUSY CP N−1 model from this view point. This question will be studied in the forth coming paper.

§2. Instanton equation for N = 1/2 Super Yang-Mills Theory

To the purpose of studying how the instanton equation may be modified in the deformed N = 2 SUSY CP N−1 model in d=2, it is useful to look at the modified in- stanton equation in the deformed super Yang-Mills theory. We begin by summarizing the result of the latter case.6) In four dimensions, the non(anti)commutativity is introduced to N =1 super- space by deforming the commutation relations for superspace coordinates (xµ,θα, θ¯α˙ ) as1)

˙ {θα,θβ} = Cαβ, {θα, θ¯α˙ } = {θ¯α˙ , θ¯β} = 0, (2.1) [yµ,yν ] = 0, [yµ,θα] = [yµ, θ¯α˙ ] = 0, yµ = xµ + iθσµθ.¯

The Lagrangian of N = 1/2 super Yang-Mills theory is then given by

2 α 2 ¯ ¯ α˙ ¯ LN = 1 YM = iτ d θtrW Wα − iτ¯ d θW Wα˙ 2 Z Z 2 µν |C| 2 +(iτ − iτ¯) −iC trFµν λ¯λ¯ + tr(λ¯λ¯) , (2.2)  4  µν αβ µν γ 2 µν where C = C ǫβγ (σ )α, |C| = C Cµν. Wα and W¯ α˙ are the field strength su- perfield. τ andτ ¯ are the gauge coupling constants. The above Lagrangian in the ordinary sense is invariant under the following N = 1/2 supersymmetry transforma- tions.

µν i δλ = iǫD + σ ǫ Fµν + Cµν λ¯λ¯ , (2.3)  2  µ µ δAµ = −iλ¯σ¯ ǫ, δD = −ǫσ Dµλ,¯ δλ¯ = 0 .

The other half Q¯ of N = 1 SUSY is broken. The usual N = 1 super Yang-Mills theory possesses instantons, which are solu- tions to the set of anti-self-dual equations, + µ ¯ . Fµν = 0, σ Dµλ = 0, λ = 0. (2 4)

They also satisfy the equation of motion. After extension of the super Yang-Mills theory to the NC superspace, we may define instantons as solutions to eq. (2.4). 3

However, they are not solutions of the equation of motion any more. This apparent contradiction should be resolved by modifying the instanton equation for the super Yang-Mills theory. The correct modification was found by Imaanpur6) and Britto et al8) by consid- ering the BPS condition. It reads as follows. The anti-self-dual equation is deformed and reads as i F + + C λ¯λ¯ = 0, σµD λ¯ = 0, λ = 0. (2.5) µν 2 µν µ The self-dual equation is not modified: − µ ¯ . Fµν = 0, σ¯ Dµλ = 0, λ = 0. (2 6) It is easy to see that solutions to eqs. (2.5) or (2.6) are also solutions to the equations of motion, which are given by

µ ¯¯ µ − i ¯¯ D (Fµν + iCµν λλ)= D Fµν + Cµνλλ  2  µ + i ¯¯ . = D Fµν + Cµνλλ = 0 , (2 7)  2  µ µν ¯ + i ¯¯ σ¯ Dµλ = −C λ Fµν + Cµν (λλ) ,  2  µ σ Dµλ¯ = 0 .

§3. Lagrangian of the CP N−1 model on NC superspace

SUSY CP N−1 model in d = 2 can be obtained from that in d = 4 by dimensional reduction.12) The same method can be used to obtain the CP N−1 model on NC superspace in d = 2.9) We denote the sets of scalar and Dirac fields by ϕa,ϕ ¯a¯ and χa,χ ¯a¯ (a = 1, 2, · · · , N −1) respectively. The Lagrangian of the CP N−1 model on NC superspace in d = 2 is written in terms of the component fields as

L = L0 + LC , (3.1) a µ ¯b ¯b µ a 1 ¯b µ a d¯ c L = g ¯∂ ϕ ∂ ϕ¯ + ig ¯χ¯ σ¯ D χ − R ¯ ¯(¯χ σ¯ χ )(¯χ σ¯ χ ), (3.2) 0 ab µ ab µ 8 abcd µ 11 a c 22 a c µν ¯b d¯ . LC = ga¯bgcd¯(C χ+χ+ − C χ−χ−)ǫ (∂µϕ¯ )(∂ν ϕ¯ ). (3 3) a a a Here χ+,χ− are the two components of the 2D spinor χ . L0 is the undeformed N−1 13), 14) part, namely, the usual SUSY CP Lagrangian. LC is the new term due to N−1 a superspace non(anti)commutativity. ga¯b is the Fubini-Study metric on CP . Γbc and Ra¯bcd¯ are the Christoffel symbol and the Riemann curvature tensor, respectively. a Dµχ is the covariant derivative. They are given by

(1 +ϕϕ ¯ )δa¯b − ϕ¯aϕ¯b g ¯ = , (3.4) ab (1 +ϕϕ ¯ )2 a ad¯ . Γbc = g ∂bgcd¯, (3 5) 4

a a a b c . Dµχ = ∂µχ + Γbc(∂µϕ )χ , (3 6) fe¯ . Ra¯bcd¯ = −gae¯∂c(g ∂d¯gf¯b)= ga¯bgcd¯ + gad¯gc¯b. (3 7)

§4. Instanton equation for CP N−1 model on NC superspace

We introduce the complex coordinates z = x0 + ix1, z¯ = x0 − ix1. (4.1)

µν We write ∂ = ∂z and ∂¯ = ∂z¯. The antisymmetric tensor ǫ is written as ǫzz = ǫz¯z¯ = 0, ǫzz¯ = −2i, ǫzz¯ = 2i. (4.2) The original self-dual equation and anti-self-dual equation can be written in terms of the complex coordinates (4.1) as follows. Self-dual equation: ¯ a a¯ a a¯ a a¯ . ∂ϕ = ∂ϕ¯ = 0, Dzχ− = Dz¯χ¯+ = 0, χ+ =χ ¯− = 0. (4 3) Anti-self-dual equation: a ¯ a¯ a a¯ a a¯ . ∂ϕ = ∂ϕ¯ = 0, Dz¯χ+ = Dzχ¯− = 0, χ− =χ ¯+ = 0. (4 4) a a¯ a We now study the equations of motion. Let Ω be one of the fields ϕ ,ϕ ¯ , χ+, a a¯ a¯ N−1 χ−,¯χ+,χ ¯−. The equation of motion for CP model on NC superspace is written as follows

∂L ∂L ∂L0 ∂L0 ∂LC ∂LC ∂µ − = ∂µ − + ∂µ − = 0. (4.5) ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω  ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω   ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω  The instanton solution before the deformation is a special solution for the equation of motion of L0 part. Then we have

∂L0 ∂L0 ∂µ − = 0. (4.6)  ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω  instanton

§5. Equation of motion of LC Part

We now deal with the second term in eq. (4.5). The factor of derivative ofϕ ¯ in LC is

µν ¯b d¯ ¯b d¯ ¯b d¯ ǫ (∂µϕ¯ )(∂ν ϕ¯ ) = 2i(∂¯ϕ¯ ∂ϕ¯ − ∂ϕ¯ ∂¯ϕ¯ ). (5.1)

LC can be rewritten as F a c ¯ ¯b d¯ . LC = C ga¯bgcd¯χF χF ∂ϕ¯ ∂ϕ¯ , (5 2) F X=+,− where we have set C+ = 4iC11, C− = −4iC22. We analyse the equations of motion a a¯ a a a¯ a¯ for each of the scalar and fermion fields, ϕ ,ϕ ¯ , χ+, χ−,¯χ+,χ ¯−, which we denote 5 by Ω collectively. We first consider the case of Ω =ϕ ¯a¯.

∂LC F a c ¯b ¯l ¯b ∂ = C χ χ g ¯g (∂∂¯ϕ¯ ) + (g ∂¯¯g ¯ + g ¯∂¯¯g )(∂ϕ¯ )(∂¯ϕ¯ ) ∂(∂ϕ¯e¯) F F ab ce¯ ce¯ l ab ab l ce¯ F X=+,− h i F a l a m c + C ga¯bgce¯ (∂χF + ∂ϕ · ΓlmχF )χF F X=+,− h a c l c m ¯ ¯b . +χF (∂χF + ∂ϕ · ΓlmχF ) (∂ϕ¯ ), (5 3) i

∂LC F a c d¯ ¯l d¯ ∂¯ = C χ χ gaeg ¯(∂∂¯ ϕ¯ ) + (g ¯∂¯¯gae + gae∂¯¯g ¯)(∂¯ϕ¯ )(∂ϕ¯ ) ∂(∂¯ϕ¯e¯) F F ¯ cd cd l ¯ ¯ l cd F X=+,− h i F ¯ a ¯ l a m c + C gae¯gcd¯ (∂χF + ∂ϕ · ΓlmχF )χF FX=+,− h a ¯ c ¯ l c m d¯ . +χF (∂χF + ∂ϕ · ΓlmχF ) (∂ϕ¯ ), (5 4) i

∂LC F a c ¯b d¯ = C ∂¯ (g ¯g ¯) · χ χ (∂¯ϕ¯ )(∂ϕ¯ ). (5.5) ∂ϕ¯e¯ e¯ ab cd F F F X=+,− From eqs. (5.3) - (5.5) and after changes of dummy indices, we obtain

∂LC ∂LC F a c ¯ ¯ . ∂µ e¯ − e¯ = C χF χF ∂¯l(ga¯bgce¯)+ ∂¯b(gae¯gc¯l) (5 6) ∂(∂µϕ¯ ) ∂ϕ¯ F X=+,− h ¯ ¯l ¯ ¯b −∂e¯(ga¯bgc¯l) (∂ϕ¯ )(∂ϕ¯ ) i a c ¯ ¯b a c ¯ ¯b +(ga¯bgce¯ − gae¯gc¯b) C+Dzχ+ · χ+∂ϕ¯ + C−Dzχ− · χ−∂ϕ¯ h a c ¯b a c ¯b −C+Dz¯χ+ · χ+∂ϕ¯ − C−Dz¯χ− · χ−∂ϕ¯ . i We note that all terms in eq. (5.6) contain factors (they are underlined) which vanish by use of the SD equation (4.3). Hence, we have derived

∂LC ∂LC . ∂µ e¯ − e¯ = 0. (5 7)  ∂(∂µϕ¯ ) ∂ϕ¯  SD eq.

a a a a¯ a¯ For the other fields Ω = ϕ ,χ+,χ−, χ¯+, χ¯−, LC does not contain ∂µΩ. Hence, their equations of motion are

∂LC ∂LC ¯ ¯b d¯ ∂ F a c . ∂µ − = −(∂ϕ¯ )(∂ϕ¯ ) C ga¯bgcd¯χF χF . (5 8) ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω ∂Ω F X=+,−

Because of the factor ∂ϕ¯d¯, the same equation as (5.7) holds. We now have shown

∂LC ∂LC ∂µ − = 0 (5.9)  ∂(∂µΩ) ∂Ω  SD eq.

6 for all fields. It means that the original instanton solutions are solutions to the equation of motion of the CP N−1 model on NC superspace. The same statement can be made for anti-instantons. Our result that the undeformed instanton equation is in accord with the de- formed equation of motion is in clear contrast with the super Yang-Mills case and is surprising at first sight. We recall that the N = 1/2 supersymmetry transfor- mation for the NC deformed supersymmetric CP N−1 model is not affected by the non(anti)commutativity Cαβ 6= 0,9) unlike the the super Yang-Mills case, eq. (2.4). The absence of corrections to the instanton equation due to the deformation in the supersymmetric CP N−1 model is related to the absence of corrections to the SUSY transformation due to Cαβ. This is because the instanton equation is a BPS equa- tion.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported partially by the research grant of Japanese Ministry of Education and and Science (Kiban B and Kiban C) and Chuo University research grant. K.A. is supported by the Research Assistant Fellowship of Chuo University. This work is also supported by Astrophysical Research Center for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos (ARCSEC).

References

1) N. Seiberg, JHEP 0306 (2003) 010. 2) S. Ferrara and M. A. Lledo, JHEP 0005(2000) 008. D. Klemm, S. Penati and L. Tamassia, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 2905. S. Ferrara, M. A. Lledo and O. Macia, JHEP 0309 (2003) 068. 3) M. T. Grisaru, S. Penati and A. Romagnoni, JHEP 0308 (2003) 003. R. Britto and B. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 201601. A. Romagnoni, JHEP 0310 (2003) 016. 4) M. Alishahiha, A. Ghodsi and N. Sadooghi, Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 111. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones and L. A. Worthy, Phys. Lett. B 611 (2005) 199. 5) K. Araki, T. Inami, H. Nakajima and Y. Saito, JHEP 0601 (2006) 109. 6) A. Imaanpur, JHEP 0309 (2003) 077. 7) K. Ito and H. Nakajima, Phys. Lett. B 629 (2005) 93. 8) P. A. Grassi, R. Ricci and D. Robles-Llana, JHEP 0407 (2004) 065. R. Britto, B. Feng, O. Lunin and S. J. Rey, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 126004. M. Billo, M. Frau, I. Pesando and A. Lerda, JHEP 0405 (2004) 023. T. Araki, T. Takashima and S. Watamura, JHEP 0512 (2005) 044. 9) T. Inami and H. Nakajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111 (2004) 961. 10) T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 411. 11) R. S. Ward, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 315 (1985) 451. 12) S. Aoyama and M. Tonin, Nucl. Phys. B 179 (1981) 293. 13) A. D’Adda, P. Di Vecchia and M. Luscher, Nucl. Phys. B 152 (1979) 125. 14) E. Cremmer and J. Scherk, Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978) 341.