DOCSLIB.ORG

North Macedonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Macedonia INDEPENDENT I Evaluation Office United Nations Development Programme INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION NORTH MACEDONIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiencyPARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes COORDINATION AND DEVELOPMENT responsiveness COORDINATINATION HUMAN effectivenessCOORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiency PARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR RESULTS effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiencyCOORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes COORDINATION AND DEVELOPMENT responsiveness COORDINATINATION HUMAN effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiency COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiency PARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING COORDINATION AND DEVELOPMENT responsiveness NATIONAL OWNERSHIP sustainability PARTNERSHIP INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION NORTH MACEDONIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiency PARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes COORDINATION AND DEVELOPMENT responsiveness COORDINATINATION HUMAN effectivenessCOORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiencyPARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR RESULTS effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiency COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness relevance sustainabilityMANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes COORDINATION AND DEVELOPMENT responsiveness COORDINATINATION HUMAN effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiencyCOORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sustainability COORDINATION relevance sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivenes HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness effectivenessCOORDINATION efficiencyPARTNERSHIP sustainability NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING REPORTS PUBLISHED UNDER THE ICPE SERIES Afghanistan Côte d’Ivoire Lao People’s Philippines (Islamic Republic of) Croatia Democratic Republic Rwanda Albania Cuba Liberia Sao Tome and Principe Algeria Djibouti Libya Senegal Angola Dominican Republic Malawi Serbia Argentina Ecuador Malaysia Seychelles Armenia Equatorial Guinea Maldives Sierra Leone Azerbaijan Egypt Mali Somalia Bahrain El Salvador Mauritania Sri Lanka Bangladesh Eswatini Mexico Sudan Barbados and OECS Ethiopia Moldova (Republic of) Syria Belarus Gabon Mongolia Tajikistan Benin Georgia Montenegro Tanzania Bhutan Ghana Morocco Thailand Bosnia and Herzegovina Guatemala Mozambique Timor-Leste Botswana Guinea-Bissau Namibia Togo Brazil Guyana Nepal Tunisia Bulgaria Honduras Nicaragua Turkey Burkina Faso India Niger Uganda Cambodia Indonesia Nigeria Ukraine Cameroon Iraq North Macedonia United Arab Emirates Chile Jamaica Pacific Islands Uruguay China Jordan Pakistan Uzbekistan Colombia Kenya Panama Viet Nam Congo (Democratic Kosovo Papua New Guinea Yemen Republic of) Kuwait Paraguay Zambia Congo (Republic of) Kyrgyzstan Peru Zimbabwe Costa Rica INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION: NORTH MACEDONIA Copyright © UNDP October 2020 Manufactured in the United States of America. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by the UNDP Independent Evaluation Office. Acknowledgements The Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of UNDP would like to thank all those who have contributed to this evaluation. IEO TEAM Oscar A. Garcia (Director), Evaluation consultants: Indran Naidoo (former Director) and Paul Georis, Daniele Pedretti and Silvana Rusi, Arild Hauge (Deputy Director) through the consulting firm T33Srl Lead Evaluator: Research support: Alan Fox Tianhan Gui and Elizabeth Wojnar RBEC Cluster Evaluation Coordinator: Publishing and outreach: Yogesh Bhatt Nicki Mokhtari The IEO could not have completed the evaluation without the support from: UNDP North Macedonia: Other stakeholders and partners: Narine Sahakyan (Resident Representative), Government of North Macedonia, Sanja Bojanic (Deputy Resident representatives of the United Nations agencies, Representative) and Jasmina Belcovska nongovernmental organizations and bilateral (M&E and Innovation Adviser). and multilateral development partners, civil society and communities consulted. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i Foreword I am pleased to present the Independent Country The evaluation notes that UNDP is recognized as Programme Evaluation of the UNDP country a neutral and reliable partner by both donors and programme in North Macedonia. This is the first the Government, and a partner of choice when country-level assessment of UNDP interventions in rapid development advice and programming is North Macedonia by the Independent Evaluation needed, that builds effective partnerships with Office (IEO) of the United Nations Development local stakeholders. The evaluation highlights a Programme (UNDP). The evaluation covers the tendency for the Government to use UNDP as an programme period from 2016 to mid-2019. It implementing body to compensate for capacity has been carried out in collaboration with the gaps, which can weaken incentives for govern- Government of North Macedonia, UNDP North ment ministries to strengthen their own capacities. Macedonia country office, and the UNDP Regional Recommendations are provided, which include Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of suggestions for UNDP to scale up subnational inter- Independent States (RBEC). ventions, encourage inter-municipal cooperation and reinforce the role of regional planning in the UNDP has supported the Government of context of European Union integration. North Macedonia for over two decades to pursue economic and social reforms and build capacity for I would like to thank the Government of sustainable management of natural resources. Over North Macedonia, various national stakeholders the years, its programme has been shaped by the and colleagues at the UNDP North Macedonia country’s development priorities, challenges and country office and UNDP RBEC, who graciously the Government’s Programme of Work. provided their time, information and support to this evaluation. I trust that the findings, conclu- Its current programme (2016-2020), which is under sions and recommendations provided herein will review, focuses on support to the Government for help to strengthen the formulation of UNDP’s next promoting good governance to ensure delivery of country programme strategy in North Macedonia better services to all citizens; addressing issues of for a more impactful contribution to the achieve- social inclusion by empowering the most vulner- ment of sustainable development results in the able people in society and expanding employment country. opportunities; and building resilience societies and ensuring sustainable development. The evaluation found that UNDP has played an important role in helping to address high-priority Oscar A. Garcia, national development issues, even as it notes Director, continuing challenges. The evaluation highlights a Independent Evaluation Office need to improve intersectoral coherence, to better address the needs of target groups from multiple perspectives. FOREWORD iii Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations vii Evaluation Brief 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Purpose, objectives and scope of the evaluation 4 1.2 Country context 5 1.3 UNDP programme under review 9 CHAPTER 2. FINDINGS 15 2.1 Employment and livelihoods 17 2.2 Democratic governance 17 2.3 Social inclusion 20 2.4 Environmental sustainability and resilience 22 2.5 Results management 24 2.6 Portfolio management 25 2.7 Joint programming 25 2.8 Gender 26 CHAPTER 3. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSE 27 3.1 Conclusions 28 3.2 Recommendations and management response 31 ANNEXES 42 TABLE AND FIGURES Table 1. UNDP country programme outcomes: indicative budget and expenditures 9 Figure 1. CPD North Macedonia 2016-2020: share of indicative budget per outcome area 10 Figure 2. Evolution of expenditure by outcome area 10 Figure 3. Expenditures recorded as share of indicative budget 10 v Acronyms and Abbreviations ALMM Active Labour Market Measures CO Country office CPD Country programme document CSO Civil society organization CWP Community Works Programme EU European Union DRR Disaster risk reduction GDP Gross domestic product GEN Gender marker GHG Greenhouse gas ICPE Independent Country Programme Evaluation IEO Independent Evaluation Office LSGU Local self-government unit M&E Monitoring and evaluation MLSP Ministry of Labour and Social Policy MoLSG Ministry of Local Self-Government ODA Official development assistance PSD Partnership for Sustainable Development PwD Person with disabilities RBEC UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States ReLOaD Regional Programme on Local Democracy in Western Balkans ROAR Results Oriented Annual Report SDC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disaster and the Red Cross Red Crescent Response to Date
    Revised Emergency Appeal The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Population Movement Revised Appeal n° MDRMK005 People to be assisted: Appeal launched 10 September 2015 First phase (until March 2016): 214,886 people1; Glide n° OT-2015-000069-MKD Second phase (until December 2016): 6,250 people2 Revision n° 2 issued 6 June 2016 193,218 Swiss francs DREF allocated Appeal ends 31 December 2016 6,095,910 Swiss francs revised Appeal budget Extended 3 months (from September 2016) 933,353 Swiss francs funding gap This Revised Emergency Appeal seeks a total of some 6,095,910 Swiss francs - a small increase from the original budget of 5,927,821 Swiss francs - to enable the IFRC to support the Red Cross of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to deliver assistance and support to some 221,136 people. The current revised appeal builds upon the previous revision, continuing the provision of basic food and non-food items, hygiene promotion, health care including First Aid, Restoring Family Links (RFL) services, and community engagement, as well as building the response capacities of the National Society through contingency stocks. With this revision, the Red Cross of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is responding to the daily needs of the beneficiaries stranded in the two camps, as well as to the needs of irregular migrants in the Detention Centre in Skopje and to those of irregular migrants crossing the border from Serbia and Greece. The National Society is adding the provision of psychosocial support and more comprehensive community engagement strategy with both the national population and the migrants, as well as the rehabilitation of their asylum centre to support the long term shelter needs of the migrants in country.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Systems Practice (Lsp) Activity Local Works Macedonia | Civil Society Organizational Network Analysis (Ona)
    LOCAL SYSTEMS PRACTICE (LSP) ACTIVITY LOCAL WORKS MACEDONIA | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (ONA) JUNE 2018 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by LINC LLC and local partner, the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Prepared by: Craig Hempfling, LINC; Megan McDermott, LINC; Jenna White, LINC; Patrick Sommerville, LINC; Aleksandar Krzalovski, MCIC; Emina Nuredinoska, MCIC; Aleksandra Savevska, MCIC; Boris Ristovski, MCIC; Monika Bozinoska, MCIC; and Jasmina Ristovska, MCIC Front cover: Network map of Macedonian CSOs. Acknowledgements: The author(s) would like to acknowledge all of our LSP consortium partners for their input throughout the process, the valuable assistance of MCIC support staff in ensuring a thorough and timely analysis, as well as all of the organizations who took the time to participate in the Network Analysis survey. These contributions are crucial for advancing our mutual efforts towards improved local development in Macedonia. About Local Systems Practice: Local Systems Practice is a USAID-funded activity that directly assists multiple Missions, partners, and constituents to design and adaptively manage systems-based programs in complex environments. The concept has been designed to aid Missions and partners to overcome four specific challenges to effective Local Systems Practice through: a) Listening; b) Engagement; c) Discovery; and d) Adaptation. The Theory of Change underpinning the activity asserts that the application of systems tools to complex local challenges at multiple intervals throughout the program cycle will enhance the sustainability of programming, resulting in better-informed, measurable interventions that complement and reinforce the systems they seek to strengthen.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1MB)
    Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia with a grant from the CEI-ES Know How Programme organize 1st INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE PROJECT Environmental Impact assessment of the Kozuf metallogenic district in southern Macedonia in relation to groundwater resources, surface waters, soils and socio-economic consequences (ENIGMA) PROCEEDINGS Edited by: T. Serafimovski & B. Boev th Kavadarci, 10 October 2013 1st International Workshop on the ENIGMA Project (Ref. No. 1206KEP.008-12) 10th October 2013, Kavadarci - Macedonia Organizing Committee: Prof. D-r Todor Serafimovski, President Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Saša Mitrev Rector of the University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Blažo Boev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia D-r Josef Šimek GIS-GEOINDUSTRY, s.r.o. (“GISGEO”), Czech Republic Prof. D-r Violeta Stefanova Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Doc. D-r Goran Tasev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia M. Sc. Ivan Boev Teaching Center-Kavadarci, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Scientific Committee: Prof. D-r Todor Serafimovski, President Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia D-r Josef Šimek GIS-GEOINDUSTRY, s.r.o. (“GISGEO”), Czech Republic Prof. D-r Blažo Boev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Nikola Dumurdžanov Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Trajče Stafilov Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Sts.
    [Show full text]
  • US to North Macedonia March 4-15, 2019
    US to North Macedonia March 4-15, 2019 Exchange Guide This exchange is made possible through a grant from the US Embassy—Skopje. Table of Contents Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 3 Schedule Notes ............................................................................................................... 14 Program Contact Information ...................................................................................... 24 Flight Confirmations and Itineraries .............................................................................. 25 Schedule Monday, March 4, Washington, DC 4:00pm Arrive at and check-in to hotel: Residence Inn by Marriott Dupont Circle 2120 P St NW Washington, DC 20037 5:45pm Meet in hotel lobby 6:15pm Welcome dinner hosted by Mr. Matt Robbins Director of Government Relations, AutoCare Association [Delegation escort, ACYPL Trustee, and alumnus to Argentina and Uruguay 2007] Location: City Tap House, 1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW In attendance will be: Ms. Libby Rosenbaum CEO, ACYPL [Timor Leste 2017] Ms. Jacqueline Harris Outreach & Engagement Director, ACYPL [South Africa and Botswana 2017] Ms. Cameron Schupp Development & Special Projects Director, ACYPL 8:00pm Return to hotel Tuesday, March 5 Washington, DC Attire: Business Breakfast: At the hotel Additional: Please check out and pay for any incidentals. Have your driver’s license accessible for State Department security. 8:30am Meeting in the lobby and load luggage into van 8:45am Depart for first meeting 9:00am Meeting with Mr. Edward Joseph Lecturer, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies 10:15am Depart for next meeting 3 11:00am Meeting at the United States Department of State In attendance will be: Mr. Brent Beemer Program Officer, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Ms. Jill Dietrich North Macedonia Desk Officer Ms. Heidi Ramsay Public Diplomacy Desk Officer Location: 2201 C Street, NW 12:00pm Depart for next activity 12:30pm Meeting with Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    E2120 EMP Checklist for Construction and Rehabilitation Activities General Guidelines for use of EMP checklist: For low-risk topologies, such as school and hospital rehabilitation activities, the ECA Public Disclosure Authorized safeguards team developed an alternative to the current EMP format to provide an opportunity for a more streamlined approach to preparing EMPs for minor rehabilitation or small-scale works in building construction, in the health, education and public services sectors. The checklist-type format has been developed to provide “example good practices” and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguard requirements. The EMP checklist-type format attempts to cover typical core mitigation approaches to civil works contracts with small, localized impacts. It is accepted that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental Management Framework (EMF) to meet World Bank Environmental Assessment requirements under OP 4.01. The intention of this checklist is that it would be applicable as guidelines for the small works contractors and constitute an Public Disclosure Authorized integral part of bidding documents for contractors carrying out small civil works under Bank-financed projects. The checklist has three sections: Part 1 includes a descriptive part that characterizes the project and specifies in terms the institutional and legislative aspects, the technical project content, the potential need for capacity building program and description of the public consultation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for additional information can be supplemented when needed. Part 2 includes an environmental and social screening checklist, where activities and potential environmental issues can be checked in a simple Yes/No format.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 May, 30 Villages Throughout the Country Theatre Performance For
    9 April - 15 May, 30 villages throughout the country Theatre performance for children: “Let me tell you a secret about the environment” Children’s Theatre Centre, Skopje (Brvenica & Sedlarce, Mlado Nagorichane & Staro Nagorichane, Chegrane & Forino, Vasilevo & Dobreici, Vatasha & Sopot, Bistrica & Kravari, Gorno Orizari, Kochilari, Leskoec & Kosel, Mogorche & Dolno Kosovrasti, Konopnica & Mozhdivnjak, Negorci & Mrzenci, Orizari, Istibanje, Ratevo & Rusinovo, Veleshta & Dobovjan and Topolcani & Kanatlarci) 20 April - Friday, 11:00-13.00 EU InfoCentre, Skopje Launching Event of EU funded cartoons: “We love Europe” Business Solutions Europa 23 April - Monday, 10:30-11:30 EU InfoCentre Press Conference on the Europe Day celebration activities 25 April - Wednesday, 14:00-16:00 Aerodrom Municipality, Skopje Drawing competition: “Europe for all generations” European Movement, Aerodrom Municipality 27 April - Friday, 12:00-14:00 Kumanovo Municipality Panel discussion: “European integration from the economic and security perspective” European Movement 30 April - Monday, Secondary schools throughout the country Open classrooms for older generations Ministry of Education and Science 30 April - Monday, Secondary schools throughout the country Essay Competition: “Why is it cool to be old?” Ministry of Education and Science 30 April - Monday, 12:00-14:00 Bitola Municipality Panel discussion: “European integration from the local perspective” European Movement 4 May - Friday, 09:30-15:00 ”Sv. Kiril i Metodij” University, Skopje Gathering of universities
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the 2014 Summer Season for Macedonia Compared to 1981-2010 Base Period
    Analysis of the 2014 summer season for Macedonia compared to 1981-2010 base period Temperature Average summer (June, July and August) air temperatures in Macedonia were mainly around normal value for the 1981-2010 base period. During summer 2014, mean air temperature ranged between 15.6.°C in Lazaropole and 25.6°C in Gevgelija. The departure of the mean temperature from the normal for the 1981-2010 base period ranged from -0.6°C in Kriva Palanka to 0.3°C in Gevgelija and Bitola. Station Departure (°C) June July August Summer OHRID -0.4 -0.8 0.8 -0.1 BEROVO -0.2 -0.4 0.4 -0.1 D.KAPIJA -1.0 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 GEVGELIJA 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.3 K.PALANKA -0.7 -0.9 -0.2 -0.6 LAZAROPOLE -0.3 -1.3 0.5 -0.4 PRILEP -0.4 -0.4 0.0 -0.3 SKOPJE -0.8 -0.6 0.1 -0.4 STIP -0.9 -0.6 0.3 -0.4 STRUMICA -0.5 -0.3 0.3 -0.2 BITOLA -0.2 0.1 0.9 0.3 Table 1. Departure of the mean temperature (°C) from the normal for the 1981-2010 base period Three-month course of the mean, maximum and minimum daily air temperature in Kriva Palanka, Gevgelija and Bitola during summer 2014 is shown in figures 1, 2 and 3. Figure 1. Three-month course of the mean, maximum and minimum daily air temperature in Kriva Palanka during summer 2014 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CORE View Metadata, Citation and Similar Papers at Core.Ac.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UGD Academic Repository Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia with a grant from the CEI-ES Know How Programme organize 1st INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE PROJECT Environmental Impact assessment of the Kozuf metallogenic district in southern Macedonia in relation to groundwater resources, surface waters, soils and socio-economic consequences (ENIGMA) PROCEEDINGS Edited by: T. Serafimovski & B. Boev th Kavadarci, 10 October 2013 1st International Workshop on the ENIGMA Project (Ref. No. 1206KEP.008-12) 10th October 2013, Kavadarci - Macedonia Organizing Committee: Prof. D-r Todor Serafimovski, President Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Saša Mitrev Rector of the University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Blažo Boev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia D-r Josef Šimek GIS-GEOINDUSTRY, s.r.o. (“GISGEO”), Czech Republic Prof. D-r Violeta Stefanova Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Doc. D-r Goran Tasev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia M. Sc. Ivan Boev Teaching Center-Kavadarci, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Scientific Committee: Prof. D-r Todor Serafimovski, President Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia D-r Josef Šimek GIS-GEOINDUSTRY, s.r.o. (“GISGEO”), Czech Republic Prof. D-r Blažo Boev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Quo Report on Accessibility for the Towns of Kavadarci, Negotino, Stip and Veles
    Status – quo Analysis Reports Activity 1 of the Project: Equal Access through Service Learning for Persons with Disabilities Skopje, 2012 Note: The texts herein, in general, are included as originally submitted by the authors, i.e. they were not subject to contextual changes. Status – quo Analysis Reports Activity 1 of the Project: Equal Access through Service Learning for Persons with Disabilities Status Quo R e p o r t for the towns of Kavadarci, Negotino, Stip and Veles Republic of Macedonia Author: Biljana Manevska Veles Skopje/Veles, 2012 2 Table of Contents: Contents Table of Contents: ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Education ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Public Services ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Banks ............................................................................................................................................................... 27 Sports-Entertainment ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Examples of Good Practice ............................................................................................................................. 38 Transport/Movement
    [Show full text]