DOCSLIB.ORG

JB APUSH Unit VA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JB APUSH Unit VA ExpansionExpansion AndAnd SectionalismSectionalism Democracy In America (1840) ▶ Impressed with American notion of equality . More social mobility than Europe . Success achievable for those willing and able ▶ “I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers, and it was not there . in her fertile fields and boundless forests and it was not there . in her rich mines and her vast world commerce, and it was not there . in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution, and it was not there. Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.” ManifestManifest DestinyDestiny ▶ ““Away,Away, awayaway withwith thesethese cobwebcobweb tissuestissues ofof thethe rightsrights ofof discovery,discovery, exploration,exploration, settlement,settlement,…… [The[The AmericanAmerican claim]claim] isis byby thethe rightright ofof ourour manifestmanifest destinydestiny toto overspreadoverspread andand toto possesspossess thethe wholewhole ofof thethe continentcontinent whichwhich ProvidenceProvidence hashas givengiven usus forfor thethe developmentdevelopment ofof thethe greatgreat experimentexperiment ofof libertyliberty…”…” ▶ -- JohnJohn L.L. Sullivan,Sullivan, DemocraticDemocratic ReviewReview,, 18451845 American Progress Overland Trails Result of Manifest Destiny Texas Revolution ▶ American settlement . Fueled by Manifest Destiny . Encouraged by Mexican government ▶ Texas Revolution (1836) . Santa Anna’s policies . The Alamo (Feb-Mar 1836) . Battle of San Jacinto (Apr 21, 1836) SecondSecond PartyParty SystemSystem (1828-1854)(1828-1854) ▶ Democrats: . States’ rights ▶ Anti-Masonic Party: . Limited . issue party concerned government about Freemasons . Laissez-faire . promoted economic . Expansionism nationalism and social . Pro-slavery conservatism . Equal opportunity ▶ Liberty Party: . South and West . abolitionist party . Yeoman farmers, working class, Andrew Jackson ▶ Free Soil Party: southern planters, . Prevent expansion of immigrants slavery ▶ Whigs: . American System . Strong federal government . Mixed on slavery . Social conservatives . New England . Upper and middle class professionals, evangelical Protestants Henry Clay Taney Court ▶ Chief Justice Roger Taney . Appointed by Andrew Jackson . Slave owner ▶ Ideology . States’ rights . Limited government ▶ Major Cases . Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837) . Scott v. Sandford (1857) . Ex parte Merryman (1861) Election of 1840 ▶ William Henry Harrison (W) . “Tippecanoe and Tyler Too” . “Log Cabin and Hard Cider” ▶ Martin Van Buren (D) . Suffers from Panic of 1837 Sectionalist Presidents William Henry Harrison (W) (1841) ▶ Campaign . A war hero and hero of the common man ▶ Reality . Wealthy plantation and slave owner ▶ Administration . Intended to re-establish and promote American System policies . Lasts one month after contracting pneumonia . John Tyler assumes presidency Sectionalist Presidents John Tyler (W) (1841-1845) ▶ “His Accidency” . Assumes full presidential powers ▶ A Democrat in Whig Clothing . Slave owner from Virginia . Rejects American System policies . Passionately pursues Texas annexation ▶ Webster-Ashburton Treaty (1842) . Settles boundary disputes with Great Britain Election of 1844 ▶ James K. Polk (D) . Darkhorse candidate . Expansion platform ▶ Henry Clay (W) . Avoided direct expansionist rhetoric Sectionalist Presidents James K. Polk (D) (1845-1849) ▶ Jacksonian Democrat, slave owner, and ardent expansionist ▶ Agenda . Independent national treasury . Lower tariffs . Oregon . California ▶ Oregon . “54’ 40 or Fight!” . 49th Parallel ▶ Mexican-American War (1848) . Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo . Mexican Cession Oregon Country Mexican-American War (1846-1848) ▶ Thornton Affair (4/24/1846) ▶ War Plan and Execution . John Fremont in California . Stephen Kearny in New Mexico . Zachary Taylor in Texas . Winfield Scott in Veracruz and Mexico City ▶ Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) . Rio Grande as Texas border . Mexican Cession ▶ $15 million and assumption of claims against Mexico ▶ Wilmot Proviso . Prohibit slavery in Mexican Cession lands . Failed to pass Senate Election of 1848 ▶ Zachary Taylor (W) . Slave owner . War hero ▶ Lewis Cass (D) ▶ Martin van Buren (FSP) California Gold Rush ▶ Sutter’s Mill . January 24, 1848 ▶ Massive migration to California ▶ Forty-Niners ▶ San Francisco . 5,000 in 1848 . 25,000 in 1850 Compromise of 1850 ▶ Parameters . Admit California as free state . Mexican Cession ▶ Popular sovereignty . Reinforced Fugitive Slave Law . Texas boundary and debt disputes . Slave trade abolished in D.C. ▶ “I trust we shall persist in our resistance [to the admission of California] until the restoration of all our rights, or disunion, one or the other is the consequence. We have borne the wrongs and insults of the North long enough.” - John C. Calhoun Fugitive Slave Law ▶ Enforcement of capturing and returning escaped slaves ▶ Slaves flee to Canada ▶ Right to trial by jury denied ▶ Special Commission . $10 for those finding for slaveholder . $5 for those finding for fugitive Underground Railroad ▶ Mostly run by free blacks and fugitive slaves . Harriet Tubman ▶ Abolitionists and white supporters . Few white families in South assisted . Slave catchers knowledge Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852) ▶ Harriet Beacher Stowe ▶ Bestselling novel ▶ Adapted as a play ▶ Fuels abolitionist guilt and rhetoric in Northern free states Slavery and Literature Anti-Slavery Arguments Pro-Slavery Arguments ▶ Uncle Tom’s Cabin ▶ Sociology for the South (1854) . Harriet Beecher Stowe . George Fitzhugh . Moral and emotional argument . Capitalism and liberalism against slavery virtually enslaved the lower ▶ Impending Crisis of the South classes (1857) ▶ Cannibals All! (1857) . Hinton Helper . George Fitzhugh . Empirical analysis of economic . "the unrestricted exploitation impact of slavery on the South of so-called free society is . “Freesoilers and abolitionists more oppressive to the laborer are the only true friends of the than domestic slavery." South; slaveholders and slave- breeders are downright enemies of their own section. Anti-slavery men are working for the Union and for the good of the whole world; proslavery men are working for the disunion of the States, and for the good of nothing except themselves." Sectionalist Presidents Zachary Taylor (W) (1849-1850) ▶ War hero of Mexican-American War ▶ States’ rights, but no secession ▶ Views on Slavery . Slave owner . No expansion of slavery . Refused to sign Compromise of 1850 ▶ Died after a year in office Sectionalist Presidents Millard Fillmore (W) (1850-1853) ▶ Assumes the presidency after Taylor’s death ▶ Anti-slave moderate ▶ Signs Compromise of 1850 ▶ Perry Expedition to Japan (1853-1854) The Death of Compromising? ▶ The Great Triumvirate was no more by 1852 ▶ A new generation of sectional and ambitious politicians assume leadership roles William Seward (W, R) Stephen Douglas (D) Jefferson Davis (D) Election of 1852 ▶ Franklin Pierce (D) . “Doughface” ▶ Winfield Scott (W) Sectionalist Presidents Franklin Pierce (D) (1853-1857) ▶ Jackson Democrat from New Hampshire ▶ Doughface . Supported Compromise of 1850 . Gadsden Purchase . Ostend Manifesto (1854) . Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) . William Walker and Nicaragua Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) ▶ Stephen Douglas and Chicago ▶ Parameters . Separate Nebraska Territory into Nebraska and Kansas . Each territory voted for slavery based on popular sovereignty ▶ Impact . Douglas won his railroad and Southern support . Virtually repealed the Missouri Compromise . Ended the Whig Party and Second Party System Bleeding Kansas (1854-1861) ▶ Kansas Territory settled by two groups . Free-Soilers . Border Ruffians ▶ A virtual civil war between anti-slave and pro-slave local governments . Sacking of Lawrence . Pottawatomie Massacre ▶ Pierce and federal government barely addressed the issue A Tragic Prelude, John Steuart Curry, 1937 Brooks-Sumner Incident May 22, 1856 ▶ Senator Charles Sumner (R) (MA) . ‘Crime Against Kansas’ Speech ▶ Rep. Preston Brooks (D) (SC) . Becomes a Southern hero The Republican Party ▶ Makeup . Disillusioned Northern Democrats . Frustrated Conscience Whigs . Free Soil Party members ▶ Platform: . Increasingly against expansion of slavery . Protective tariffs . Homestead Act/sale of federal lands . Funding for transcontinental railroad Scott v. Sandford (1857) ▶ “[Blacks] had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far unfit that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” ▶ " . We think they [people of African ancestry] are . not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. ." ▶ “For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased...to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senators You Have to Know John C. Calhoun –
    Senators You Have To Know John C. Calhoun – South Carolina / serving terms in the United States House of Representatives, United States Senate and as the seventh Vice President of the United States (1825–1832), as well as secretary of war and state. Democrats After 1830, his views evolved and he became a greater proponent of states' rights, limited government, nullification and free trade; as he saw these means as the only way to preserve the Union. He is best known for his intense and original defense of slavery as something positive, his distrust of majoritarianism, and for pointing the South toward secession from the Union. Nullification is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. The theory of nullification has never been legally upheld;[1] rather, the Supreme Court has rejected it. The theory of nullification is based on a view that the States formed the Union by an agreement (or "compact") among the States, and that as creators of the federal government, the States have the final authority to determine the limits of the power of that government. Under this, the compact theory, the States and not the federal courts are the ultimate interpreters of the extent of the federal government's power. The States therefore may reject, or nullify, federal laws that the States believe are beyond the federal government's constitutional powers. The related idea of interposition is a theory that a state has the right and the duty to "interpose" itself when the federal government enacts laws that the state believes to be unconstitutional.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Compromise (1820) • Compromise Sponsored by Henry Clay
    Congressional Compromises and the Road to War The Great Triumvirate Henry Clay Daniel Webster John C. Calhoun representing the representing representing West the North the South John C. Calhoun •From South Carolina •Called “Cast-Iron Man” for his stubbornness and determination. •Owned slaves •Believed states were sovereign and could nullify or reject federal laws they believed were unconstitutional. Daniel Webster •From Massachusetts •Called “The Great Orator” •Did not own slaves Henry Clay •From Kentucky •Called “The Great Compromiser” •Owned slaves •Calmed sectional conflict through balanced legislation and compromises. Missouri Compromise (1820) • Compromise sponsored by Henry Clay. It allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a Slave State and Maine to enter as a Free State. The southern border of Missouri would determine if a territory could allow slavery or not. • Slavery was allowed in some new states while other states allowed freedom for African Americans. • Balanced political power between slave states and free states. Nullification Crisis (1832-1833) • South Carolina, led by Senator John C. Calhoun declared a high federal tariff to be null and avoid within its borders. • John C. Calhoun and others believed in Nullification, the idea that state governments have the right to reject federal laws they see as Unconstitutional. • The state of South Carolina threatened to secede or break off from the United States if the federal government, under President Andrew Jackson, tried to enforce the tariff in South Carolina. Andrew Jackson on Nullification “The laws of the United States, its Constitution…are the supreme law of the land.” “Look, for a moment, to the consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit of Honorable Compromise
    The past is never dead. It's not even past NOT EVEN PAST Search the site ... The Spirit of Honorable Compromise Like 27 Tweet by H. W. Brands When Benjamin Franklin left the Constitutional Convention in September 1787, he was approached by a woman of Philadelphia, who asked what the deliberations of Franklin and his colleagues had given the young nation. “A republic,” he said, “if you can keep it. Henry Clay was ten years old that summer. He didn’t learn of Franklin’s challenge till later. But when he did, he discovered his life’s work. Clay and others of the generation that followed the founders confronted two problems in particular–two pieces of public business left unnished in the founding. The rst was the awkward silence of the Constitution on the fundamental question of the federal system: when the national government oversteps its authority, how is that government to be restrained? Must the states obey laws they believe to be unconstitutional? Put most succinctly: where does sovereignty ultimately lie–with the states or with the national government? The second problem was the contradiction between the equality promised by the Declaration of Independence and the egregious inequality inherent in the constitutionally protected institution of slavery. Thomas Jefferson’s assertion that “all men are created equal” was not repeated in the Constitution, but it provided the basis for American republican government, which the Constitution embodied and proposed to guarantee. Slavery made a mockery of any claims of equality. Privacy - Terms For forty years Clay wrestled with these challenges. In the golden age of Congress, when the legislative branch retained the primacy intended for it by the founders, the silver- tongued Kentuckian had no equal for adroitness and accomplishment in the Capitol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Triumvirate: Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun
    Essential Civil War Curriculum | David S. Heidler and Jeanne T Heidler, The Great Triumvirate | October 2015 The Great Triumvirate: Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun By David S. Heidler and Jeanne T. Heidler Beginning in the War of 1812, Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun achieved a national prominence that endured for more than four decades. As they rose in fame, they personified the regions that quarreled over expansion, finance, foreign policy, and slavery. Webster, who originally represented New Hampshire and then Massachusetts in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, reflected a New England Yankee’s promotion of merchant trade and rejection of slavery. The South Carolinian Calhoun personified the South’s gradual transformation from staunch nationalism after the War of 1812 to the belligerent sectionalism that caused all the trouble during the 1850s. Henry Clay was from Kentucky, which at the time made him a westerner, and he too mirrored his section’s role in the unfolding national strife. The West was seen as a potential counterweight by North and South as the two sections sought to prevail politically in Congress. When they quite literally took the argument outside and began shooting at each other, the West became the decisive military counterweight for the Union. It was fitting, for through it all Henry Clay had been the most consistent nationalist of the three. Over the course of his long career, he refused to tolerate anything that threatened the Union. Because these three wielded often irresistible political influence during the sectional crises that led to the Civil War, their careers are linked to the catastrophe despite their having died roughly a decade before secession brought on the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Mass Democracy: 1820-1840
    AP U.S. History: Unit 4.2 Student Edition The Rise of Mass Democracy: 1820-1840 I. The "New Democracy" Use Space Below for Notes A. By the 1820s, politicians made an increased effort to appeal to the voting masses. 1. Most high offices were still held by wealthy citizens. 2. Change in emphasis: a. Jeffersonian democracy: the people should be governed as little as possible; gov’t for the people b. Jacksonian democracy: government should be done directly by the people. This idea underlay Jackson’s spoils system in the 1830s. B. The New Democracy was based on universal white manhood suffrage rather than property qualifications: the common man now became more influential. 1. Between 1812 and 1821, 6 new western states granted universal manhood suffrage 2. Between 1810 and 1821, 4 eastern states significantly reduced voting requirements. However, by 1860 only New England still allowed African Americans to vote in the North. 3. South was last region to grant universal white manhood suffrage. 4. New voters demanded politicians that would represent common peoples' interests. 5. Frederick Jackson Turner: "The Significance of the Frontier on American History" (1893) Thesis: Existence of cheap unsettled land in the West created a frontier society that shaped the American character—more democratic and egalitarian. C. Rise of workingmen’s parties 1. Laborers in the east formed organizations that demanded free education for their children, a 10-hr work day, and an end to debtor’s prisons. 2. Some groups became violent (especially during Panic of 1837) II. Causes of the New Democracy A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Split During Buchanan's Administration
    THE DEMOCRATIC SPLIT DURING BUCHANAN'S ADMINISTRATION By REINHARD H. LUTHIN Columbia University E VER since his election to the presidency of the United States Don the Republican ticket in 1860 there has been speculation as to whether Abraham Lincoln could have won if the Democratic party had not been split in that year.' It is of historical relevance to summarize the factors that led to this division. Much of the Democratic dissension centered in the controversy between President James Buchanan, a Pennsylvanian, and United States Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois. The feud was of long standing. During the 1850's those closest to Buchanan, par- ticularly Senator John Slidell of Louisiana, were personally antagonistic toward Douglas. At the Democratic national conven- tion of 1856 Buchanan had defeated Douglas for the presidential nomination. The Illinois senator supported Buchanan against the Republicans. With Buchanan's elevation to the presidency differences between the two arose over the formation of the cabinet.2 Douglas went to Washington expecting to secure from the President-elect cabinet appointments for his western friends William A. Richardson of Illinois and Samuel Treat of Missouri. But this hope was blocked by Senator Slidell and Senator Jesse D. Bright of Indiana, staunch supporters of Buchanan. Crestfallen, 'Edward Channing, A History of the United States (New York, 1925), vol. vi, p. 250; John D. Hicks, The Federal Union (Boston and New York, 1937), p. 604. 2 Much scholarly work has been done on Buchanan, Douglas, and the Democratic rupture. See Philip G. Auchampaugh, "The Buchanan-Douglas Feud," and Richard R.
    [Show full text]
  • 274 Kansas History Th E Ka N S a S to U R O F Li N C O L N T H E Ca N D I D a T E
    Abraham Lincoln, photographed by Alexander Hesler on June 3, 1860, six months after his visit to Kansas. “That looks better and expresses me better,” Lincoln said of the photo, “than any I have ever seen; if it pleases the people I am satisfied.” Kansas History: A Journal of the Central Plains 31 (Winter 2008–2009): 274–288 274 Kansas History THE KANSAS TOUR OF LINCO L N T HE CANDIDA T E by Fred W. Brinkerhoff ast November the Kansas State Historical Society held its 133rd annual meeting and, among other things, marked the forthcoming bicentennial of Abraham Lincoln’s birth and the 150th anniversary of his one and only visit to Kansas. The latter is something Kansans have celebrated many times over the years. For example, in 1902 the Kansas Historical Collections published “Lincoln in Kansas,” a collection of con- Ltemporary newspaper accounts and reminiscences about the Great Emancipator’s 1859 visit; in 1945 the Kansas Historical Quarterly published Fred W. Brinkerhoff’s annual presidential address, “The Kansas Tour of Lincoln the Candidate”; and on the eve of the state’s centennial in 1959, the Society helped reprise the Illinois politician in the person of newspaper editor Rolla Clymer, who “reconstructed the political scene of 1859 and gave the essence of what Lincoln . may have said in several long speeches.”1 The following essay, delivered on October 17, 1944, and printed in February 1945, is republished here because we believe its insights and observations remain relevant and will be of interest to readers of Kansas History. The editor added the notes, but the text is Brinkerhoff’s and has been edited only for style.2 Presidential Address, Kansas State Historical Society, October 1944 American statesmen destined to achieve the presidency have had a habit of coming to Kansas to be seen and to be heard as their parties prepared to move toward convention halls.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 BLACK JACK BATTLEFIELD Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Black Jack Battlefield Other Name/Site Number: Evergreen Stock Farm; Pearson, Robert Hall, Farm; Sites #04000365, 04001373, 04500000389 2. LOCATION Street & Number: U.S. Highway 56 and County Road 2000, 3 miles east of Baldwin City Not for publication: City/Town: Baldwin City Vicinity: X State: Kansas County: Douglas Code: 045 Zip Code: 66006 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): ___ Public-Local: X District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: X _ Public-Federal: ___ Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 0 6 buildings 3 0 sites 0 3 structures 0 6 objects 3 15 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 6 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 BLACK JACK BATTLEFIELD Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Dred Scott</Em>
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 82 Issue 1 Symposium: 150th Anniversary of the Article 4 Dred Scott Decision December 2006 Dred Scott and the Crisis of 1860 Louise Weinberg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Louise Weinberg, Dred Scott and the Crisis of 1860, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 97 (2007). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol82/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DRED SCO7T AND THE CRISIS OF 1860* LOUISE WEINBERG* INTRODUCTION: A PROVOCATIVE VIEW In recent work, Mark Graber, a participant in this Symposium, argues provocatively that Dred Scott v. Sandfordi was a "centrist" decision when handed down.2 In Graber's view, most Americans were comfortable with Dred Scott. He points out that Congress, and indeed the whole country, had repeatedly looked to the Taney Court to settle the -issue of slavery in the territories, and argues that the country was happy to abide by whatever the Court decided. Graber's main point is that Dred Scott was a needed compromise that sustained the Democratic Party's North-South coalition, and in that way sustained the Union itself. Graber argues that the conflict between North and South became irreconcilable when it became wholly sectional, with the breakup of the Democratic Party into separate Northern and Southern fac- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Triumvirate
    2/12/2014 The Great Triumvirate Clay, Calhoun, & Webster Henry Clay “The Great Compromiser” John C. Calhoun • 1777 - Born in Hanover County, VA • 1782 - Born in in Abbeville, S.C. “Champion of States’ Rights” • 1797 - moved to Lexington, KY • 1811 – 1817 - House of Representatives – Member of War Hawks who called for war • 1806 – 1807 - U.S. Senate with Britain in 1812. • 1810 – 1811 - U.S. Senate • 1817-1825 Sec. of War for James Monroe – sought censure of Andrew Jackson for • 1811 –1814 - Speaker of the House overstepping his authority by invading Spanish Florida in 1818 • negotiated Treaty of Ghent • 1825 – 1829 - Vice-President for J.Q. Adams • 1815 – 1825 Speaker of the House • American System • 1829 – 1832 - Vice-President for Jackson • Missouri Compromise – issued Doctrine of Nullification, resigns in Dec 1832 • 1825 - 1829 Sec. of State for J.Q. Adams • 1832 – 1843 - U.S. Senate • 1831 – 1842 - U.S. Senate • 1844 – 1845 - Secretary of State for Tyler • created the compromise tariff to end – Completed the annexation of Texas the Nullification Crisis • 1845 – 1850 - U.S. Senate • 1849 – 1852 - U.S. Senate – Compromise of 1850 “In looking back, I see • Compromise of 1850 • argued to support slavery and the rights of nothing to regret and little “I’d rather be right than slave holders; died before the final votes on to correct.” • 1824, 1832, 1844 – Ran for President president” - Henry Clay the parts of the Compromise make it law. - John C. Calhoun Daniel Webster The Great Triumvirate • 1782 - Born in Salisbury, New Hampshire llll Henry Clay John C Calhoun “Defender of the Union” • Between 1812 • 1813 – 1817 - House of Representatives and 1850 had • 1816 - 1823 - Lawyer in Boston, MA more impact on – 1819 – McCulloch vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln's Entire Public Service O
    Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln’s entire public service on the national level before his election as president was a single term in the U. S. House. Though he had little chance to distinguish himself there, his experience proved a useful education in dealing with Congress and patronage. WASHINGTON, D.C. Arriving in Washington on December 2, 1847, the Lincolns found themselves in a “dark, narrow, unsightly” train depot, a building “literally buried in and surrounded with mud and filth of the most offensive kind.”1 A British traveler said he could scarcely imagine a “more miserable station.”2 Emerging from this “mere shed, of slight construction, designed for temporary use” which was considered “a disgrace” to the railroad company as well as “the city that tolerates it,”3 they beheld an “an ill-contrived, 1 Saturday Evening News (Washington), 14 August 1847. 2 Alexander MacKay, The Western World, or, Travels in the United States in 1846-47 (3 vols.; London: Richard Bentley, 1850), 1:162. 3 Letter by “Mercer,” n.d., Washington National Intelligencer, 16 November 1846. The author of this letter thought that the station was “in every respect bad: it is cramped in space, unsightly in appearance, inconvenient in its position, and ill adapted to minister to the comfort of travellers in the entire character of its arrangements.” Cf. Wilhelmus Bogart Bryan, A History of the National Capital from Its Foundation through the Period of the Adoption of the Organic Act (2 vols.; New York: Macmillan, 1914-16), 2:357.
    [Show full text]