DOCSLIB.ORG

Nathaniel Gage Papers SC0153

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nathaniel Gage Papers SC0153 http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81j983d No online items Guide to the Nathaniel Gage Papers SC0153 Daniel Hartwig, Jenny Johnson, & Presley Hubschmitt Department of Special Collections and University Archives October 2010 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Nathaniel Gage SC0153 1 Papers SC0153 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Nathaniel Gage papers creator: Gage, N. L. (Nathaniel Lees) source: Gage, N. L. (Nathaniel Lees) Identifier/Call Number: SC0153 Physical Description: 107 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1940-2008 Abstract: Correspondence, drafts, and notes related to non-Stanford professional activities; teaching materials and departmental files; student files kept by Gage regarding his graduate students; SCRDT administrative records as well as files of scholars, conferences, associations, labs and publishers; organizations represented include American Psychological Association, American Council on Education, American Educational Research Association, and the National Society for the Study of Education. Also includes correspondence, memos, and minutes, 1983-1989, pertaining to the journal TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION. Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 48 hours in advance. For more information on paging collections, see the department's website: http://library.stanford.edu/spc. Immediate Source of Acquisition note Gift of Nathaniel Gage, 1976-2010. Information about Access Materials are open for research use. Audio-visual materials are not available in original format, and must be reformatted to a digital use copy. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/depts/spc/pubserv/permissions.html. Restrictions also apply to digital representations of the original materials. Use of digital files is restricted to research and educational purposes. Cite As Nathaniel Gage Papers (SC0153). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Biographical/Historical Sketch Professor of education and psychology at Stanford since 1962, co-director of the Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching (1965-1968) and chairman of SCRDT's Executive Board (1968- ). Description of the Collection Correspondence, drafts, and notes related to non-Stanford professional activities; teaching materials and departmental files; student files kept by Gage regarding his graduate students; SCRDT administrative records as well as files of scholars, conferences, associations, labs and publishers; organizations represented include American Psychological Association, American Council on Education, American Educational Research Association, and the National Society for the Study of Education. Also includes correspondence, memos, and minutes, 1983-1989, pertaining to the journal TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION. Subjects and Indexing Terms Education, Higher. Gage, N. L. (Nathaniel Lees) American Psychological Association. Gage, N. L. (Nathaniel Lees) National Society for the Study of Education. Stanford University. Graduate School of Education American Council on Education. Guide to the Nathaniel Gage SC0153 2 Papers SC0153 Gage, N. L. (Nathaniel Lees) American Educational Research Association. Stanford University. Graduate School of Education. Faculty Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching. Papers Series 1 NATHANIEL GAGE - PERSONAL PAPERS box 1, folder 1 American Psychological Association Committee on relations between psychology and education. 1956 Sep Scope and Contents note Programs and working papers for conference. box 1, folder 2 American Psychological Association: Task force E. 1961-62 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 4/61 - 6/66. "Report of ad hoc task force E to the Board of Professional Affairs of the A.P.A." box 1, folder 3 Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development - Center for the Study of Instruction: Seminar on Teaching. 1965 May Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Research on cognitive aspects of teaching" Correspondence: 12/64 - 8/66 Rosenshine, B.: "Rough comments on cognitive aspects of teaching" box 1, folder 4 Associated Organization for Teacher Education. Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Psychological theory and empirical research for teacher education." Correspondence: 9/63 - 9/64. box 1, folder 5 Geneseo, New York , State University College. 1965 Nov Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Research on cognitive aspects of teaching" Correspondence: 3/65 - 5/67. box 1, folder 6 Great Cities School - University Teacher Education Project. Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Desirable behaviors of teachers." Correspondence: 8/64 - 4/65 Ellis, Richard: "Looking toward desired behaviors in teachers of the disadvantaged." Gordon, Edmund: "Desired teacher behavior in schools for socially disadvantaged children." Steward, Charles: "Compilation of responses regarding successful teacher behavior in inner city schools." "The development of school-university programs for the pre-service education of teachers for the disadvantaged through teacher education centers." Pittsburgh Study: "Promising teachers behavior for use among culturally disadvantaged pupils." Guide to the Nathaniel Gage SC0153 3 Papers SC0153 Papers Series 1 box 1, folder 7 Illinois Statewide curriculum study center for the preparation of teachers of secondary school English. 1964 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 6/64 - 1/65. Reports of the conference. box 1, folder 8 National Council of Teachers of English. 1963 Nov Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "This side of paradigms: the state of research on teaching English." "Research design with special reference to the teaching of English." Correspondence: 7/63 - 6/64. box 2, folder 1 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook: Theories of Learning. Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Theories of teaching." (A chapter for the 1964 yearbook, several copies, various revisions.) Correspondence: 12/60 - 3/64. box 2, folder 2 New York State Annual Research Convocation. 1962 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 6/62 - 10/62. box 2, folder 3 New York University Lecture. 1965 Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Psychological conceptions of teaching." Correspondence: 3/65 - 12/66. box 2, folder 4 Ohio State: Conference on Teacher Education. 1964 Apr Scope and Contents note Programs, list of participants. box 2, folder 5 Orange County Elementary School Administrator's Association. 1965 May Scope and Contents note Notes by Dr. Gage for his speech "Feedback from teachers to Principals: Does it make a difference?" Schedule of activities; questionnaire for participants. box 2, folder 6 Philadelphia desegregation. 1963 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 10/63. Clark, Kenneth: "Social science testimony in the desegregation cases." Van den Haag, Ernest: "Segregated schools in New York City." Legal brief: Anthony Chisholm, minor, vs. the Board of Public Education of Philadelphia. box 2, folder 7 Project Talent. Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 10/61 - 6/65. box 2, folder 8 Project Talent. Workshop. 1960, 1961 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 8/60 - 2/61. Guide to the Nathaniel Gage SC0153 4 Papers SC0153 Papers Series 1 box 2, folder 9 San Diego Meeting. 1963 Dec Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "An essay on research design for professional workers in the public schools." Program for workshop. Correspondence: 10/63 - 1/64. Report: "The San Diego project for the educationally and culturally disadvantaged." box 2, folder 10 San Diego County Department of Education. 1965 Aug Scope and Contents note Gage, N.L.: "Ways of analyzing teacher behavior." Program outline. Correspondence: 4/65 - 9/65. Receipts, bills, and travel vouchers. box 2, folder 11 SRA Principles of democracy test: forms A and B. 1959 Dec Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 3/55 - 12/59. "Notes on discussions of N.L. Gage with Robert Bauernfiend concerning Principles of Democracy Test." Copy of test; graphs of statistics of test results. box 3, folder 1 Social Science Research Council Conference on Personality Development in High School Youth. Scope and Contents note Program. Correspondence: 1/63 - 3/63. Travel voucher. box 3, folder 2 Social Work and Education. 1964 Apr Scope and Contents note Programs. Notes from conference. Correspondence: 3/65 - 6/65. Expense voucher. box 3, folder 3 SPATE (Student Personnel Association for Teacher Education) San Francisco. 1964 Scope and Contents note Gage, N. L.: "The evaluation of teaching." Correspondence: 1/64 - 6/64. box 3, folder 4 Syracuse Conference on System Analysis and Operations Research. 1964 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 12/63 - 2/64. box 3, folder 5 UNESCO Institute for Education. 1966-67 Scope and Contents note Correspondence: 7/66 - 10/67. Conference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metodologia Empírica Seguida Neste Trabalho
    Universidade do Minho Escola de Psicologia Sílvia Correia Monteiro Percursos de excelência académica no ensino superior: Estudo em alunos de Engenharia em Portugal Percursos de excelência académica no ensino superior: de excelência Percursos Estudo em Portugal em alunos de Engenharia Sílvia Correia Monteiro Julho de 2012 UMinho | 2012 Universidade do Minho Escola de Psicologia Sílvia Correia Monteiro Percursos de excelência académica no ensino superior: Estudo em alunos de Engenharia em Portugal Tese de Doutoramento em Psicologia Área de especialização em Psicologia da Educação Trabalho efectuado sob a orientação de Professor Doutor Leandro da Silva Almeida e da Professora Doutora Rosa Maria de Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos Julho de 2012 DECLARAÇÃO É AUTORIZADA A REPRODUÇÃO INTEGRAL DESTA TESE APENAS PARA EFEITOS DE INVESTIGAÇÃO, MEDIANTE DECLARAÇÃO ESCRITA DO INTERESSADO, QUE A TAL SE COMPROMETE. Braga, ___/___/______ Assinatura: __________________________________________________________ AGRADECIMENTOS O desenvolvimento deste trabalho, concretizado na presente tese, resultou de um intenso percurso de desenvolvimento pessoal e profissional no qual colaboraram e contribuíram várias pessoas, junto de quem pretendo manifestar o meu reconhecido agradecimento. Aos meus orientadores, Professor Doutor Leandro Almeida e Professora Doutora Rosa Maria Vasconcelos, pela disponibilização de oportunidades que permitiram desenvolver este trabalho e, sobretudo, pela partilha dos conhecimentos que o orientaram, desde o primeiro momento. Ao Professor Doutor José Cruz, pelo apoio e conselhos prestados em diversas fases, e que em muito contribuíram para o desenvolvimento deste trabalho. Ao Professor Doutor Raúl Vidal, da Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, e à Dra. Isabel Gonçalves e Dra. Ana Lucas, do Instituto Superior Técnico, pelo apoio concedido no contacto com os participantes deste trabalho, que em muito contribuíram para o seu enriquecimento metodológico.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Teaching and the Education of Teachers: Brokering the Gap Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S
    Shavelson, Richard J. Research on teaching and the education of teachers: Brokering the gap Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S. 37-53 Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Shavelson, Richard J.: Research on teaching and the education of teachers: Brokering the gap - In: Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S. 37-53 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-217737 - DOI: 10.25656/01:21773 http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-217737 http://dx.doi.org/10.25656/01:21773 in Kooperation mit / in cooperation with: http://www.bzl-online.ch Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, We grant a non-exclusive, non-transferable, individual and limited persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses right to using this document. Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für den This document is solely intended for your personal, non-commercial persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. Die use. Use of this document does not include any transfer of property Nutzung stellt keine Übertragung des Eigentumsrechts an diesem rights and it is conditional to the following limitations: All of the Dokument dar und gilt vorbehaltlich der folgenden copies of this documents must retain all copyright information and Einschränkungen: Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments other information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf alter this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute or Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie otherwise use the document in public.
    [Show full text]
  • (“Terry”) Tao and Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng Reflect on Their Talent Development
    SMP y ’ S G R E a T E S T c H I l D P R o D IGIES Insights From SMPy’s Greatest Former child Prodigies: Drs. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and lenhard (“lenny”) Ng Reflect on Their Talent Development Michelle C. Muratori and Julian C. Stanley Miraca U. M. Gross Johns Hopkins University University of New South Wales Lenhard Ng Terence Tao Duke University University of California, Los Angeles Jack Ng Billy Tao University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Flinders University aSTRB a c T PTINGu T T HE R ESE a R c H T o u S E If the academic needs of the most profoundly gifted students can be met through the use of existing Given the wide-ranging differences in abilities, educational practices, specialists in gifted education interests, personalities, life experiences, and cul- can assume that the educational needs of less able, but ture that are evident among academically talented still academically talented, students can also be met students, most specialists in gifted education would by using some combination of these strategies as well. agree that a one-size-fits-all approach to educating This paper illustrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the gifted is antithetical to the fundamental prin- ® ¨ utilizing an individualized educational approach with ciples underpinning gifted education. As responsive gifted students by highlighting the unique educational as educators would like to be to the needs of their paths taken by two of the very ablest math prodigies gifted students, they may be reluctant to individual- identified by Dr. Julian Stanley through the Study ize the curriculum for these students on the grounds of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) since that they lack sufficient resources to provide such a its founding in 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement and Research in the Service of Education. INSTITUTIGN Georgia Univ., Athens
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 04E 725 TM 000 305 AUTHOR Findley, Warren G. TITLE Measurement and Research in the Service of Education. INSTITUTIGN Georgia Univ., Athens. Research and Development Center in Educational Stimulation. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C. Cooperative Research Program. REPORT NO Ccc-Pap-10 PUB DATE Jun 70 CONTRACT CEC-6-10-061 NOTE 18p.; Invited address to Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology, American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 1970 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.25 HC-$1.00 DESC2IETOES Educational Innovation, Educational Policy, Educational Problems, *Educational Research, Educational Testing, *Evaluation, Instrumentation, International Education, Longitudinal Stuclies, *Measurement Techniques, National Surveys, *Research and Development Centers, Research Methodology, Research Utilization, *Statistical Analysis AESTRACT This running commentary cites examples to show. that measurement and research in education, since Binet, have been used to solve schccl problems. Current problems cited stem from post-World War II acceptance of the goal of educating "all the children of all the people." Compensatory education, peer-tutoring vs. competitive scrambling, mastery learning, retention vs. dropout, and socioeconcmic segregation by tests, require study. Background surveys are cited that define the scope of the problems. Longitudinal studies ale recommended that feed back evidence of need and of success and failure en route to terminal evaluation. Multivariate analysis is advanced as essential methodology; person-environment interactions should be studied, not just controlled, if individualization is a goal of the teaching-learning process. Major research and development organizations need to be based on an interactive model, rather than a linear model, tc speed action and guide research.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanfordeducator Education Alumni Summer 2012 Newsletter
    Stanford University School of StanfordEducator Education Alumni Summer 2012 Newsletter Welcoming Our New Dean An Interview with Claude Steele Steve Castillo By Amy Yuen and Mindy Hollar laude Steele stepped into his new role as the I. James Quillen Dean for Stanford University School of Education on September 1, 2011. Steele, who served as the twenty-first provost of Columbia University, is Ca preeminent social psychologist. Prior to assuming the position of chief academic officer at Columbia, he was a member of the Stanford psychology faculty from 1991 to 2009. On The Farm, he held appointments as the Lucie Stern Professor in the Social A Return to the Farm: Claude Steele at the Cubberley Library. Sciences, chair of the Psychology Department, director of the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, and director of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. His research focuses on the psychological experience of the individual, Table of Contents and particularly, on the experience of threats to the self and Inside Page the consequences of those threats. His book, Whistling Vivaldi: Welcoming Our New Dean 1 How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do, examines his 2 theory of stereotype threat, which has been the focus of much of School of Education Launches Lemann Center his research for the past 20 years. Steele earned his doctorate in End of the American Dream? 3 psychology from Ohio State University, and has received honorary School Reform Gets Real World 5 degrees from the University of Michigan, the University of Chicago, “Learning to Be Jewish” 8 Yale University, Princeton University, and the Faculty News 11 University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
    [Show full text]
  • Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically: Smpy's
    Editorial The guest editor for this issue is Professor Julian Stanley, Chair- man of the Department of Psychology of The Johns Hopkins Univer- sity, Baltimore, Maryland. Professor Stanley has been directing the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth, perhaps the out- standing longitudinal study since Terman’s Genetic Studies of Genius. His editorial follows: YOUTHS WHO REASON EXTREMELY WELL MATHEMATICALLY: SMPY’S ACCELERATIVE APPROACH Julian C. Stanley For this special issue I commissioned three articles to be prepared by persons presently or formerly associated with the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. These are supplemented by a selection of items from SMPY’s newsletter-journal, the Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin (ITYB), which appears ten times yearly. For several months I also looked for other novel approaches to helping mathematically precocious youths a great deal educationally but could not find any that seemed nearly as strongly facilitative as SMPY’s &dquo;smorgasbord&dquo; of accelerative opportunities. Quite a few courses such as calculus are being taught better hitherto in a number of schools. Many summer, evening, or Saturday mor- 237 ning schools, camps, institutes, or supplemental programs offer cer- tain mathematics courses to able enrollees, usually as &dquo;enrichment&dquo; rather than for high school or college credit. Few of these are radical departures from long-known best practice, however, nor do they usually help relieve much of the fru~tration that the mathematically brilliant boy or girl is virtually certain to find in typical mathematics classes. During its first five years, supported financially by a grant from the Spencer Foundation of Chicago (which recently was renewed for three years), SMPY has been resoundingly successful in helping many certifiably youths move ahead in mathematics and other sub- jects at levels and rates appropriate FOR THEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Experiences of an out of School Academic Enrichment Programme for High Ability Students Transitioning from DEIS Primary Schools to DEIS Secondary Schools
    Student experiences of an out of school academic enrichment programme for high ability students transitioning from DEIS primary schools to DEIS secondary schools Eamonn Carroll B.A. M.Phil Institute of Education, Dublin City University Thesis submitted for the Award of Ph.D. to Dublin City University (DCU) Submission Date- September 2020 Supervisors: Prof. Joe O’Hara & Dr. Colm O’Reilly Declaration of Work I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ______________________________________ (Candidate) ID No: 16210030 Date: _________________________ i ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my two doctoral supervisors, Professor Joe O’Hara and Dr. Colm O’Reilly for their constructive feedback, guidance and encouragement throughout this project. I would also like to thank Dr. Jennifer Riedl Cross and Professor Tracy Cross for the interest they have shown in my project and in my development as a researcher, as well as the kindness they have shown in all of our interactions. This thesis would not have been possible without the incredible (professional and personal) support I have received from everyone in the CTYI office over the last four years.
    [Show full text]
  • El-Estudio-De-Julian-C--Stanley-Sobre
    El estudio de Julian C. Stanley sobre talento excepcional: Una aproximación personalizada para dar respuesta a las necesidades de los estudiantes con altas capacidades The Julian C. Stanley Study of Exceptional Talent: A Personalized Approach to Meeting the Needs of High Ability Students Linda E. Brody El estudio de Julian C. Stanley sobre talento excepcional: talento sobre Stanley C. Julian de estudio El Una aproximación personalizada para dar respuesta a las a respuesta dar para personalizada aproximación Una necesidades de los estudiantes con altas capacidades altas con estudiantes los de necesidades The Julian C. Stanley Study of Exceptional Talent: Exceptional of Study Stanley C. Julian The A Personalized Approach to Meeting the Needs of High of Needs the Meeting to Approach Personalized A Ability Students Ability Brody, J.E. THE JUlIAn C. S TAnlEy STUDy Of EXCEpTIOnAl TAlEnT : Un EnfOqUE pERSOnAlIzADO pARA ATEnDER lAS nECESIDADES DE lOS AlUmnOS DE AlTA CApACIDAD Universidad John Hopkins, como desde su predecesor el Estudio de Jóvenes Matemáticamente Precoces (SMPY, Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth ). Con el renovado interés en el aprendizaje personalizado que existe en nuestros días, se nos presenta la oportunidad de institucionalizar este enfoque con mayor amplitud. Aún con todo, los alumnos necesitan información y recomendaciones de adultos expertos en programas que les ayudarán a desarrollar sus talentos; las escuelas deben ser flexibles y estar dispuestas a modificar sus currículos así como a otorgar créditos académicos por el trabajo realizado fuera de la escuela; también se deben abordar aquellas barreras económicas que puedan limitar el acceso a los programas fuera de la escuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Council for the Gifted Journal, 1992
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 347 752 EC 301 368 AUTHOR Smutny, Joan Franklin, Ed. TITLE Illinois Council for ttle Gifted Journal, 1992. INSTITUTION Illinois Council for the Gifted, Palatine. PUB DATE 92 NOTE B5p. PUB TYPE Collected Works - Serials (022) -- Guides - Fon-Classroom Use (055) JOURNAL CIT Il1inci-.; Council for the Gifted Journal; v11 1992 EDRS PRICE MFUl/PCG4 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Ability Identification; *Child Rearing; Classroom Environment; Cooperative Learning; *Curriculum Development; Educational Planning; Educational Practices; Elementary Education; *Gifted; Models; Parent Child Relationship; Preschool Children; i-reschool Education; *Program Development; Student Characteristics; Student Evaluation; *Talent Identification; Thinking Skills; Whole Language Approach IDENTIFIERS Illinois ABSTRACT This annual issue of the Illinois Council for the Gifted Journalkincludes 20 articles focusing on young gifted children. Titles and authors are: "How Can I Tell If My Preschooler is Gifted?" (Susan Golant); "Early Childhood Education for the Gifted: The Need for Intense Study and Observation" (Maurice Fisher); "Assessing Gifted and Talented Children" (James Webb); "Early Assessment of Exceptional Potential" (Beverly Shaklee and Jane Rohrer); "Teacher Assessment of Preschool and Primary Giftedness" (Jane Wolfe and W. Thomas Southern); "Characteristics of Gifted. Children and How Parents and TeaChers Can Cope with Them" (Arn3oarie Roeper); "The Needs of the Young Gifted Child (A Short and Incomplete Overview)" (Annemarie Roeper); "The
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Students Who Are Gifted and Talented. Programming for Students with Special Needs
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 442 237 EC 307 875 TITLE Teaching Students Who Are Gifted and Talented. Programming for Students with Special Needs. INSTITUTION Alberta Learning, Edmonton. Special Education Branch. ISBN ISBN-0-7732-1801-7 PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 366p. AVAILABLE FROM Special Education Branch, 10 Floor, East Devonian Bldg., 11160 Jasper Ave., Edmonton, AB T5K OL2, Canada; Tel: 780-422-6326; Fax: 780-422-2039. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Ability Identification; *Academically Gifted; *Creativity; Curriculum Development; Definitions; Educational Philosophy; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Postmodernism; *Student Characteristics; *Talent; Talent Identification; *Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Alberta ABSTRACT This guide is intended to help schools and classroom teachers in Alberta provide successful school experiences for gifted and talented students. Section 1 focuses on program administration, including Alberta legislation, policy, and regulations; district administration of programs; and school administration of programs. Section 2 identifies an emerging paradigm which views giftedness as having multiple forms and as being diagnostic, developmental and based more on performance than test results. Also considered are concepts of giftedness as defined by Sidney Marland, Joseph Renzulli, Howard Gardner, Robert Sternberg, Donald Treffinger, Francoys Gagne, Julian Stanley, John Feldhusen, and George Betts. Section 3 focuses on identification with emphasis on inclusive identification processes. Section 4 considers characteristics of creatively gifted students in the visual and performing arts and offers classroom strategies for developing these talents. Section 5 specifically discusses strategies for designing and implementing instruction, including curriculum modification and instructional strategies. Section 6 discusses post-modern theory, its impact on current educational practice, and implications for developing curricula for gifted and talented students.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanfordeducator Education Alumni Spring 2009 Newsletter
    Stanford University School of StanfordEducator Education Alumni Spring 2009 Newsletter Teaching for the World School of Education Welcomes Education Faculty Share Their Expertise New Faculty Members Across Borders By Amy Yuen By Marguerite Rigoglioso This academic year, Stanford University School round the world, economic globalization is pushing education of Education brought seven new faculty members issues to the forefront. The need to tackle concerns so familiar on board, the largest group of professors to join A to U.S. educators—including literacy, multiculturalism, student the School at one time. Four professors, profiled learning and assessment, and teacher training—has become all the more here, joined the School last fall. Three more, acute in developing countries that face pressures to build a globally com- Paulo Blikstein, Jonathan Osborne, and Mitchell petitive workforce but lack the expertise to do so. As longtime Education Stevens, joined this January and will be profiled Professor Francisco Ramirez says, “Globalization has made it much harder in the next issue. for any country to imagine that it could be completely self-contained.” continued on page 3 Given Stanford’s own thrust toward addressing international issues in recent years, Ramirez observes that the School of Education’s International Comparative Education program has moved from being a “dessert” on the Table of Contents academic menu to one of the main courses. Not only are more School of Inside Page Education faculty examining educational challenges in an international con- text, but a growing number of countries—from Malaysia to South Africa to Teaching for the World 1 Bhutan—are calling upon faculty members to provide counsel in such areas School of Education Welcomes New Faculty Members 1 as higher education management, teacher professional development, and Faculty Votes for “Open Access” 2 economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Psicología Educativa
    PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA Dr. Dante Manuel Macazana Fernández Dra. Luz Marina Sito Justiniano Dra. Alejandra Dulvina Romero Dìaz NSIA Publishing House Editions Neutrosophic Science International Association University of New Mexico. USA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA Lima - Perú, 2021. 1ª edición 2021 Dr. Dante Manuel Macazana Fernández Dra. Luz Marina Sito Justiniano Dra. Alejandra Dulvina Romero Dìaz 15,24, 22,86 cm. ISBN: REVISORES: Dr. C. Darvin Manuel Ramírez Guerra Universidad de Holguín, Cuba GUDPLUH]J#XKRHGXFX Dr. C. Wilber Ortiz Aguilar Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador RUWL]ZLOEHU#JPDLOFRP ÍNDICE PREFACIO…………………………………………………………………………… 1 CAPÍTULO I. LA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA……………………….. 5 1.1. LA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA………………………………………… 5 1.2. LA INVESTIGACIÓN PARA COMPRENDER Y MEJORAR EL APRENDIZAJE………………………………………………………………………. 14 CAPÍTULO II. ASPECTOS DEL ESTUDIANTE…………………… 23 2.1. DESARROLLO HUMANO…………………………………………….. 24 2.2. CEREBRO, DESARROLLO Y APRENDIZAJE…………………. 31 2.3. PROCESOS COGNITVOS FUNDAMENTALES………………. 42 2.3.1. MEMORIA………………………….…………………………………….. 42 2.3.2. INTELIGENCIA…………………………………………….…………… 57 2.3.2.1 MENTALIDAD FIJA (FIXED MINDSET) Y MENTALIDAD DE CRECIMIENTO (GROWTH MINDSET)……………………………………………………………. 70 2.3.3. LENGUAJE……………………..………………………………………. 71 2.3.4. PENSAMIENTO………………………………….…………………… 81 2.4. ESTRATEGIAS DIDÁCTICAS BASADAS EN LA NEUROEDUCACIÓN ……………………………………………………………… 83 2.5. MODELOS PARA LA NEUROEDUACIÓN……………………. 105 2.6. TEORÍAS Y EVALUACIÓN DE LA PERSONALIDAD…….. 108 2.7. MOTIVACIÓN……………………………………………………………. 121 2.8. ENFOQUES TEÓRICOS DE LOS PROBLEMAS DE LA ADOLESCENCIA………………………………………………………………….. 136 CAPÍTULO III. AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAJE…..…………. 155 3.1. LOS PROBLEMAS DE CONVIVENCIA ESCOLAR…………. 155 3.1.1. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA SEGUNDA INFANCIA (4-7 AÑOS)…………………………………………………………………….. 161 3.1.2. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA TERCERA INFANCIA (7-10 AÑOS)……………………………………………………….……………. 163 3.1.3. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA MADUREZ INFANTIL (10-12 AÑOS)………………………………………….………………………….
    [Show full text]