DOCSLIB.ORG

Stanfordeducator Education Alumni Summer 2012 Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stanfordeducator Education Alumni Summer 2012 Newsletter Stanford University School of StanfordEducator Education Alumni Summer 2012 Newsletter Welcoming Our New Dean An Interview with Claude Steele Steve Castillo By Amy Yuen and Mindy Hollar laude Steele stepped into his new role as the I. James Quillen Dean for Stanford University School of Education on September 1, 2011. Steele, who served as the twenty-first provost of Columbia University, is Ca preeminent social psychologist. Prior to assuming the position of chief academic officer at Columbia, he was a member of the Stanford psychology faculty from 1991 to 2009. On The Farm, he held appointments as the Lucie Stern Professor in the Social A Return to the Farm: Claude Steele at the Cubberley Library. Sciences, chair of the Psychology Department, director of the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, and director of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. His research focuses on the psychological experience of the individual, Table of Contents and particularly, on the experience of threats to the self and Inside Page the consequences of those threats. His book, Whistling Vivaldi: Welcoming Our New Dean 1 How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do, examines his 2 theory of stereotype threat, which has been the focus of much of School of Education Launches Lemann Center his research for the past 20 years. Steele earned his doctorate in End of the American Dream? 3 psychology from Ohio State University, and has received honorary School Reform Gets Real World 5 degrees from the University of Michigan, the University of Chicago, “Learning to Be Jewish” 8 Yale University, Princeton University, and the Faculty News 11 University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is an elected member of the National Academy Friends 18 of Sciences, National Academy of Education, Alumni News 20 American Philosophical Society, and American Alumni Spotlight: Todd Dickson 22 Academy of Arts and Sciences. Student News 26 http://ed.stanford.edu continued on page 14 SchoolNews School of Education Launches Center to Improve Brazilian Education By Amy Yuen n a concerted effort to significantly improve public education in Brazil in the next decade, the School of Education has launched a new center at Stanford aimed at developing new Steve Castillo Iapproaches to improve learning in Brazilian public schools. Named the Lemann Center for Educational Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Brazil, the Center will create new educational oppor- tunities inside and outside of the classroom, particularly for Brazil’s low-income students. The Lemann Center is a ten-year partnership between Stanford and the Lemann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that aims to improve the quality of public education in Brazil. Program activi- Representatives from the Lemann Foundation meet with principal faculty and ties are predominantly taking place on the Stanford campus, with student fellows of the Lemann Center for Educational Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Brazil. additional exchanges, seminars, and research taking place in Brazil. “We want to train a new generation of educational researchers the Center’s three areas of focus—education policy, technological and practitioners in Brazil, and encourage innovative policies that innovation, and entrepreneurship—as crucial components to will help our emerging country define our own education system,” sustaining lasting educational reform in a country as large and said Denis Mizne, executive director of the Lemann Foundation. diverse as Brazil.” “We chose to partner with Stanford University because of its prox- Major initiatives of the new Center include: imity to Silicon Valley and its demonstrated ability to inspire inter- Graduate training: Fellowships will be offered annually to disciplinary solutions to complex, global problems.” students from Brazil admitted to the School of Education’s mas- In addition to training educational researchers and practitioners, ter’s and doctoral programs and through Stanford’s joint MA/MBA the Center is training Brazilian policymakers, technology innovators, program between the Graduate School of Business and the School and entrepreneurs to improve access and quality in the educational of Education. Students will be trained to play key roles in Brazil in system in Brazil, which has become one of the fastest-growing the areas of educational policy, learning design, and educational economies in the world. The entrepreneurship. Center aims to attract the Hosting visiting researchers and professionals: The Center StanfordEducator best and brightest of Brazil’s will invite visiting educational researchers and innovators from Brazil CREDITS graduates and professionals to attend seminars and to work with Stanford faculty and Lemann Claude Steele, Dean from a range of top-ranked Fellowship students. Rebecca Tseng Smith, Associate fields, including engineering, Researching Innovative Approaches to Educational Change: Dean for External Relations economics, applied mathe- The Center’s four lead faculty—Eric Bettinger, Paulo Blikstein, Amy Yuen, Editor/Writer matics, and business. Martin Carnoy, and David Plank—will work with Lemann Fellows, Marguerite Rigoglioso, Mindy “The Stanford School visiting researchers and professionals, and other Stanford faculty Hollar, Brianna Liang, Nancy Mancini, Katie Oey, Heather of Education is known for and students to produce and disseminate research on educational Trippel, Rebecca Tseng Smith, producing leaders who policy, technological innovation, measurement, and entrepreneurial Contributing Writers are shaping research and projects related to improving Brazilian education. Elaine Kwong Design, Design practice around the world, Implementing an Educational Think Tank in Brazil: The and we are thrilled to build Center will create a counterpart policy research dissemination on our global involvement in organization in Brazil, with the goal of increasing the impact of education,” said Co-principal academic policy research in education policy debates in Brasilia Investigator and Professor and/or state capitals. This Brazil-based organization will draw on the Martin Carnoy. “We view continued on page 10 2 StanfordEducator the completion rate for students from End of the American Dream? low-income families has barely moved. Income Disparities are Widening the Achievement Gap “This rising gap in academic skills By Marguerite Rigoglioso and college completion has come at a time when the economy relies increas- It’s a well-established fact that the “That disparity is leading to a ingly on well-educated workers,” Steve Castillo rich are growing richer and the poor feedback cycle in which it’s becom- say Reardon. “Largely gone are the are growing poorer, and that there are ing harder and harder to achieve manufacturing jobs that provided a fewer and fewer people in between. the American dream,” says Reardon, middle-class wage but did not require What’s not so well known is how that an expert on the causes and conse- a college degree.” In today’s economy, income gap may be translating into quences of social and educational then, young men and women with- disparities in educational success— inequality. As he explains it, if family out college degrees are increasingly and what that might mean for the income is a predictor of how well peo- consigned to low-wage jobs with little long-term future of individuals, eco- ple do in school, and if school perfor- opportunity for advancement. This nomically challenged groups, and mance determines how much people is making educational achievement our entire nation. earn in the market, then economic more and more critical. A recently published study by inequality is only breeding more eco- Especially alarming, then, is Professor Sean Reardon is sounding nomic inequality. Education is no lon- Reardon’s finding that the gap in test alarm bells. Reardon has found that ger the pathway to social mobility in scores means that the lowest-income the gap in test scores between the the United States that it once was. children are lagging a crippling four highest and lowest-income students has Related studies have found that the years worth of schooling behind their grown by about 40 percent since the college completion rate for children more wealthy peers. Fifty years ago, 1960s and is now nearly twice as large from high-income families has grown they were lacking only about two and as the black-white achievement gap. sharply in the last few decades, while a half years behind. “The roots of widening educational inequality appears to lie in early childhood, not in schools,” Roots of the Growing Divide says Sean Reardon. “Schools are not the primary cause of the problem,” asserts Reardon. “If they were, the test-score gap would widen as students progress through school, but this does not happen. The test-score gap between eighth- grade students from high-and low- income families is no larger than the school-readiness gap among kinder- gartners. The roots of widening educa- tional inequality appear to lie in early childhood, not in schools.” Why? Parents who are struggling to make ends meet have little time to worry about their children’s cogni- tive development, and they don’t have the funds to pay for their enrichment, explains Reardon, whose research L.A. Cicero/Stanford News Service continued on page 4 Summer 2012 3 SchoolNews American Dream The solutions, then, Reardon prospects of rich and poor children posits, are economic and social. “The have diverged over the last 40 years continued from page 3 best way to reduce inequality and is not something our country wants to attracted national attention after being educational outcomes is to ensure believe about itself, but it’s an unde- published as a chapter in Whither that all students start on a more even niable fact that we have to come to Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, footing. This would take a number terms with.” and Children’s Life Chances (Russell of levers,” he says. “We need to make Linda Darling-Hammond, the Sage Foundation, 2011). In contrast, sure people have access to stable Charles E. Ducommun Professor parents who are economically com- jobs that pay a living wage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research on Teaching and the Education of Teachers: Brokering the Gap Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S
    Shavelson, Richard J. Research on teaching and the education of teachers: Brokering the gap Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S. 37-53 Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Shavelson, Richard J.: Research on teaching and the education of teachers: Brokering the gap - In: Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung 38 (2020) 1, S. 37-53 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-217737 - DOI: 10.25656/01:21773 http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-217737 http://dx.doi.org/10.25656/01:21773 in Kooperation mit / in cooperation with: http://www.bzl-online.ch Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, We grant a non-exclusive, non-transferable, individual and limited persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses right to using this document. Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für den This document is solely intended for your personal, non-commercial persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. Die use. Use of this document does not include any transfer of property Nutzung stellt keine Übertragung des Eigentumsrechts an diesem rights and it is conditional to the following limitations: All of the Dokument dar und gilt vorbehaltlich der folgenden copies of this documents must retain all copyright information and Einschränkungen: Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments other information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf alter this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute or Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie otherwise use the document in public.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Research to Inform Policies and Practices in Science Education: Conversations with Faculty and Administrators
    Using Research to Inform Policies and Practices in Science Education: Conversations With Faculty and Administrators Postsymposium Report This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under research grant HRD-1029477. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. September 2014 Using Research to Inform Policies and Practices in Science Education: Conversations With Faculty and Administrators Postsymposium Report September 2014 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW Washington, DC 20007-3835 202.403.5000 | TTY 877.334.3499 www.air.org Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. 3254_09/14 Acknowledgments American Institutes for Research (AIR) extends its gratitude to the symposium speakers and participants who donated their time and participated in these important discussions. We also extend our appreciation to the National Science Foundation Program Directors and Project Officers in the Human Resources Division and the Education and Human Resources Directorate. We acknowledge the work on and dedication of the AIR staff who contributed so generously to organizing and facilitating this symposium, and the writing of this postsymposium report: Courtney Tanenbaum, M.A., Principal Investigator (current) and Project Director; Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Investigator (former); Rita Kirshstein, Ph.D., Senior Advisor; Andrea Berger, Ph.D., Project
    [Show full text]
  • Stereotype Threat: Contending and Coping with Unnerving Expectations
    CHAPTER Stereotype Threat: Contending and Coping with Unnerving Expectations JOSHUA ARONSON Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York When my friends and I entered junior high school in the mid~1970s, we quickly noticed something that our teachers seemed to miss: the black and Latino kids bused into our district were a lot smarter than the adults at the school seemed to think. It was not necessarily that our teachers held the prejudiced view that minorities were dumb. Rather, as students, we had the advantage of seeing these kids in a variety of classes and situations. And their behavior from one situation to the next was often remarkably different. For example, there were many kids like Ricky, the star pupil in my electronics class. Always the first to finish his project, Ricky would go from table to table, patiently helping the electronically challenged kids like me make sense of the complex diagrams for assembling the strobe light, radio, or whatever we happened to be struggling with. There were also kids like my friend Darryl, a black eighth grader, whom I hung around with at lunch and after school. Darryl was one of the most thoughtful, intelligent, and articulate kids I knew, and no one who knew him well thought otherwise. But in some of the classes I had with Ricky and Darryl, you would never get an inkling of how bright they were. In these more "aca- demic" classes like English, Math, and History, they simply ceased to be the same kids we knew. Like most of the minority students in the school, they fell into one of two camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Review: C. Steele. 2010. Whistling Vivaldi
    Jarrod Call University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, U.S. C. Steele. 2010. Whistling Vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 242 pp., (hardcover). ISBN: 978-0393-06249-6 Keywords: academic performance, stereotype threat, identity, social psy- chology, achievement gap With the ever increasing diversity job at the local Country Club as a of our societies, Whistling Vivaldi golf caddy. After being ignored all offers a perspective on one of the day standing outside the gated en- more relevant issues of our time: trance he began to question wheth- how stereotypes affect us. The au- er his identity limited him access to thor, Claude Steele, is a social psy- some opportunities. Claude is black, chologist with a doctorate from the and in Chicago during the 1950s, Ohio State University, and is cur- black children were relegated cer- rently provost at Columbia Univer- tain times they could visit swim- sity. Dr. Steele has received many ming pools and skating rinks; and academic and professional acco- they most certainly could not carry lades, most notably two awards for golf clubs at the Country Club. Dr. Distinguished Scientific Contribu- Steele’s experience led him to theo- tions from the American Psychology rize on how identity can alter one’s Association and American Psychol- success in a given society, not only ogy Society, respectively. Central to by limiting an individual’s access to his accomplishments is his quest certain opportunities, but also by af- to better understand the nature of fecting one’s performance. race, gender, and ethnicity and their Identity contingencies are, as impacts on the individual and soci- discussed by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Questions for Whistling Vivaldi I. Steele Writes That
    Discussion Questions for Whistling Vivaldi I. Steele writes that stereotype threat can often cause people to feel intense levels of anxiety that, through no fault of their own, can restrict a person from reaching his/her potential. In turn, feeling that you do not belong in a certain space can make it difficult for to remain in that setting, and to sustain your motivation to stay there. (p.111) • Have you or someone close to you ever felt that you do not belong somewhere? • What impact did that have and what would have helped to make you feel that you belong? • How does segregation relate to underrepresentation? • In hindsight, when could you have felt this way but didn’t – and what was the difference that made you buck the trend? II. Claude Steele calls out segregation in U.S. society saying: “Segregation remains a major feature of American life. The 2000 census shows that the average White American lives in a neighborhood that is 80 percent white and 7 percent black while the average black American lives in a neighborhood that is 33 percent white and 51 percent black. This holds for suburbs as much as cities. What are the implications for students in our present day schools? People, though capable of making decisions and choices, do have a location in society; their lives are located somewhere in its social, economic, and cultural structures and in the networks of relationships that make up society. Being born into a low-income Appalachian family in the hills of Eastern Kentucky is to take life on from a different location in society’s opportunity structure than being born into a high-income family in the northern suburbs of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of an Inclusive Mindset
    Beyond Recruitment: Inclusion, Equity, and Belonging in Externships INCLUSION DESIGN GROUP DR. ERIN CONNER Inclusive Mindset Be Brave. Be Humble. Be Dedicated. Safe and Brave Space Comfort Zone Constructive Discomfort •Adapted from University of Michigan’s Intergroup Dialogue (IDI) Institute Diversity Inclusion Belonging Equity Diversity • Representation Inclusion • Opportunity & Access Belonging • Authenticity & Culture Equity • Internal & External Systems DIBE SUPERVISORS MATTER MOST 1 Success! 3 2 6 Diversity Social Identity A person’s sense of who they are based on their group membership. Which three words best describe your social identity? Social Identity Groups Age Physical Race Religious Gender Ability Beliefs Marital/ Nationality Ethnicity Parenting Body Type Status Sexual Orientation Citizenship Education Class Privilege Understand your position in relationship to others’ experiences Identify opportunities to leverage your privilege on behalf of others Intersectionality Intersectionality is a framework for thinking about power and identity. -- Kimberle Crenshaw Bias Prejudice Discrimination Oppression Bias Prejudice Discrimination Oppression Consciousness Bias Prejudice Power Discrimination Oppression Inclusion Unrelated to Passive, business indirect Low Quality outcomes Feedback Focused on style over Delayed substance Unactionable Absent 21 Tied to Specific, business concrete High Quality outcomes Feedback Tied to career Timely aspirations Not about Actionable personality 22 Disproportionate Feedback ▪Women have been found less likely to receive specific feedback tied to outcomes ▪Only 12% of women report being satisfied with the quality of the feedback they receive. ▪Professionals of color are much less likely to receive feedback than their Caucasian counterparts—and even when they do, they’re unclear as to how to act on it, particularly if they were born outside the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC (PDF)
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC This report was published in 2014 by the University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center. THIS REPORT CELEBRATES THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER’S (LRDC) 50 YEARS AS A LEADING INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON LEARNING AND EDUCATION. IT PROVIDES GLIMPSES OF LRDC OVER THE YEARS AND HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE EXCITING WORK THAT OCCUPIES OUR CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. The Center’s interconnected programs of research and development have reflected its mission of stimulating interaction between research and practice across a broad spectrum of problems, from the neural basis of learning to the development of intelligent tutors to educational policy. Among research institutions in learning and education, this interconnected breadth is unique. The Center’s research has been equally wide-ranging in the domains of learning it has studied. Reading, mathematics, and science—staples of education—have been a continuing focus over much of LRDC’s 50 years. However, the Center also has addressed less-studied learning domains (e.g., history, geography, avionics, and law) as well as the reasoning and intellectual abilities that serve learning across domains. Moreover, social settings for learning, including those outside schools; teaching effectiveness; and technol- ogy for learning are all part of LRDC’s research story. LRDC’s ability to sustain research programs across these diverse, intersecting problems owes much to the cooperation of its partnering schools and depart- ments in the University. The leadership of the University of Pittsburgh has made possible what is often very difficult: a research center that has been able to effectively pursue truly cross-disciplinary research programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Unconscious Mind
    PSYCHOLOGY OurUnconscıous Unconscious impulses and desires impel Mindwhat we think and do in ways Freud never dreamed of By John A. Bargh 32 Scientific American, January 2014 Illustrations by Tim Bower Photograph by Tktk Tktk Illustration by Artist Name January 2014, ScientificAmerican.com 33 John A. Bargh is a professor of psychology at Yale University. His Automaticity in Cognition, Motivation, and Evaluation Lab at Yale researches unconscious influences on behavior and questions such as the extent to which free will really exists. hen psychologists try to understand the way our mind works, they frequently come to a conclusion that may seem startling: people W often make decisions without having given them much thought—or, more precisely, before they have thought about them consciously. When we decide how to vote, what to buy, where to go on vacation and myriad other things, unconscious thoughts that we are not even aware of typically play a big role. Research has recently brought to light just how profoundly our unconscious mind shapes our day-to-day interactions. One of the best-known studies to illustrate the power of the For more than 100 years the role of unconscious influences on unconscious focused on the process of deciding whether a candi- our thoughts and actions has preoccupied scientists who study date was fit to hold public office. A group of mock voters were giv- the mind. Sigmund Freud’s massive body of work emphasized en a split second to inspect portrait photographs from the Inter- the conscious as the locus of rational thought and emotion and net of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program Weary Symposium on Diversity and Social Identity the Ohio State University June 18-19, 2019 Columbus, OH
    Conference Program Weary Symposium on Diversity and Social Identity The Ohio State University June 18-19, 2019 Columbus, OH Tuesday June 18, 2019 Wednesday June 19, 2019 9:30-10:00 Breakfast 9:00-9:30 Breakfast 9:55-10:00 Opening Remarks 9:25-9:30 Opening Remarks 10:00-11:00 Dr. Mary Murphy 9:30-10:30 Dr. Sylvia Perry 11:00-12:00 Dr. Jason Okonofua 10:30-11:30 Dr. Hilary Bergsieker 12:00-1:00 Lunch 11:30-12:00 Data Blitz #2 (pg. 9) 12:30-1:30 Poster Session #1 (pg. 3) 12:00-1:00 Lunch 1:30-2:00 Data Blitz #1 (pg. 5) 12:30-1:30 Poster Session #2 (pg. 10) 2:00-3:00 Dr. Denise Sekaquaptewa 1:30-2:30 Early Career Talks #2 (pg. 12) 3:00-3:15 Break 2:30-3:30 Dr. Claude Steele 3:15-4:15 Early Career Talks #1 (pg. 6) 3:30-3:45 Wrap-Up 4:15-5:15 Dr. Jennifer Richeson 5:15-5:30 Wrap-Up Social Hour/Networking 6:00-7:30 The Eagle 790 N High St. Columbus, OH Conference Dinner 7:30-9:30 Hubbard Grille 793 N High St. Columbus, OH 1 Tuesday June 18, 2019 Distinguished Speaker Tuesday 10:00AM-11:00AM Dr. Mary C. Murphy, Indiana University - Bloomington Dr. Mary Murphy is the H.B. Wells Professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Associate Vice Provost for Diversity and Inclusion at Indiana University. Her research focuses on understanding how people’s social identities and group memberships, such as their gender, race, and socio-economic status, interact with the contexts they encounter to affect people’s thoughts, feelings, motivation, and performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanfordeducator Education Alumni Spring 2009 Newsletter
    Stanford University School of StanfordEducator Education Alumni Spring 2009 Newsletter Teaching for the World School of Education Welcomes Education Faculty Share Their Expertise New Faculty Members Across Borders By Amy Yuen By Marguerite Rigoglioso This academic year, Stanford University School round the world, economic globalization is pushing education of Education brought seven new faculty members issues to the forefront. The need to tackle concerns so familiar on board, the largest group of professors to join A to U.S. educators—including literacy, multiculturalism, student the School at one time. Four professors, profiled learning and assessment, and teacher training—has become all the more here, joined the School last fall. Three more, acute in developing countries that face pressures to build a globally com- Paulo Blikstein, Jonathan Osborne, and Mitchell petitive workforce but lack the expertise to do so. As longtime Education Stevens, joined this January and will be profiled Professor Francisco Ramirez says, “Globalization has made it much harder in the next issue. for any country to imagine that it could be completely self-contained.” continued on page 3 Given Stanford’s own thrust toward addressing international issues in recent years, Ramirez observes that the School of Education’s International Comparative Education program has moved from being a “dessert” on the Table of Contents academic menu to one of the main courses. Not only are more School of Inside Page Education faculty examining educational challenges in an international con- text, but a growing number of countries—from Malaysia to South Africa to Teaching for the World 1 Bhutan—are calling upon faculty members to provide counsel in such areas School of Education Welcomes New Faculty Members 1 as higher education management, teacher professional development, and Faculty Votes for “Open Access” 2 economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Higher-Quality Assessment
    Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education Criteria for Higher-Quality Assessment By Linda Darling-Hammond, Joan Herman, James Pellegrino, Jamal Abedi, J. Lawrence Aber, Eva Baker, Randy Bennett, Edmund Gordon, Edward Haertel, Kenji Hakuta, Andrew Ho, Robert Lee Linn, P. David Pearson, James Popham, Lauren Resnick, Alan H. Schoenfeld, Richard Shavelson, Lorrie A. Shepard, Lee Shulman, Claude M. Steele Published by: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, Stanford University; Center for Research on Student Standards and Testing, University of California at Los Angeles; and Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago June 2013 LEARNING SCIENCES sco e Stanford Center for UIC Learning Sciences National Center for Research UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO Research Institute CriteriaOpportunity for High-Quality Policy in Education Assessment on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testingi The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Hewlett Foundation for this work. Suggested citation: Darling-Hammond, L., Herman, J., Pellegrino, J., et al. (2013). Criteria for high-quality assessment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Table of Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................i Criteria for High-Quality Assessment ...............................................................................1 What Should High-Quality Assessment Systems Include? ...............................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Psicología Educativa
    PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA Dr. Dante Manuel Macazana Fernández Dra. Luz Marina Sito Justiniano Dra. Alejandra Dulvina Romero Dìaz NSIA Publishing House Editions Neutrosophic Science International Association University of New Mexico. USA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA Lima - Perú, 2021. 1ª edición 2021 Dr. Dante Manuel Macazana Fernández Dra. Luz Marina Sito Justiniano Dra. Alejandra Dulvina Romero Dìaz 15,24, 22,86 cm. ISBN: REVISORES: Dr. C. Darvin Manuel Ramírez Guerra Universidad de Holguín, Cuba GUDPLUH]J#XKRHGXFX Dr. C. Wilber Ortiz Aguilar Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador RUWL]ZLOEHU#JPDLOFRP ÍNDICE PREFACIO…………………………………………………………………………… 1 CAPÍTULO I. LA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA……………………….. 5 1.1. LA PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA………………………………………… 5 1.2. LA INVESTIGACIÓN PARA COMPRENDER Y MEJORAR EL APRENDIZAJE………………………………………………………………………. 14 CAPÍTULO II. ASPECTOS DEL ESTUDIANTE…………………… 23 2.1. DESARROLLO HUMANO…………………………………………….. 24 2.2. CEREBRO, DESARROLLO Y APRENDIZAJE…………………. 31 2.3. PROCESOS COGNITVOS FUNDAMENTALES………………. 42 2.3.1. MEMORIA………………………….…………………………………….. 42 2.3.2. INTELIGENCIA…………………………………………….…………… 57 2.3.2.1 MENTALIDAD FIJA (FIXED MINDSET) Y MENTALIDAD DE CRECIMIENTO (GROWTH MINDSET)……………………………………………………………. 70 2.3.3. LENGUAJE……………………..………………………………………. 71 2.3.4. PENSAMIENTO………………………………….…………………… 81 2.4. ESTRATEGIAS DIDÁCTICAS BASADAS EN LA NEUROEDUCACIÓN ……………………………………………………………… 83 2.5. MODELOS PARA LA NEUROEDUACIÓN……………………. 105 2.6. TEORÍAS Y EVALUACIÓN DE LA PERSONALIDAD…….. 108 2.7. MOTIVACIÓN……………………………………………………………. 121 2.8. ENFOQUES TEÓRICOS DE LOS PROBLEMAS DE LA ADOLESCENCIA………………………………………………………………….. 136 CAPÍTULO III. AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAJE…..…………. 155 3.1. LOS PROBLEMAS DE CONVIVENCIA ESCOLAR…………. 155 3.1.1. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA SEGUNDA INFANCIA (4-7 AÑOS)…………………………………………………………………….. 161 3.1.2. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA TERCERA INFANCIA (7-10 AÑOS)……………………………………………………….……………. 163 3.1.3. LA DISCIPLINA EN LA MADUREZ INFANTIL (10-12 AÑOS)………………………………………….………………………….
    [Show full text]