Constelaciones Estrella Binaria Menores Del Sur B PER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born. -
Pos(MULTIF2017)001
Multifrequency Astrophysics (A pillar of an interdisciplinary approach for the knowledge of the physics of our Universe) ∗† Franco Giovannelli PoS(MULTIF2017)001 INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133 Roma, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Lola Sabau-Graziati INTA- Dpt. Cargas Utiles y Ciencias del Espacio, C/ra de Ajalvir, Km 4 - E28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] We will discuss the importance of the "Multifrequency Astrophysics" as a pillar of an interdis- ciplinary approach for the knowledge of the physics of our Universe. Indeed, as largely demon- strated in the last decades, only with the multifrequency observations of cosmic sources it is possible to get near the whole behaviour of a source and then to approach the physics governing the phenomena that originate such a behaviour. In spite of this, a multidisciplinary approach in the study of each kind of phenomenon occurring in each kind of cosmic source is even more pow- erful than a simple "astrophysical approach". A clear example of a multidisciplinary approach is that of "The Bridge between the Big Bang and Biology". This bridge can be described by using the competences of astrophysicists, planetary physicists, atmospheric physicists, geophysicists, volcanologists, biophysicists, biochemists, and astrobiophysicists. The unification of such com- petences can provide the intellectual framework that will better enable an understanding of the physics governing the formation and structure of cosmic objects, apparently uncorrelated with one another, that on the contrary constitute the steps necessary for life (e.g. Giovannelli, 2001). -
A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short). -
GRAVITY ASTROPHYSICS a Plan for the 1990S
ULTRAVIOLET, VISIBLE, and GRAVITY ASTROPHYSICS A Plan for the 1990s (NASA-NP-I52) ULTRAVIOLET, N94-24973 VISI3LE, ANO GRAVITY ASTROPHYSICS: A PLAN FOR THE 1990'S (NASA) 76 p Unclas HI190 0207794 ORIGINAL PAGE COLOR PHOTOGRAPH National Aeronautics and Space Administration I-oreword N ASA'sprioritiesOfficefrom oftheSpaceU.S. NationalScience Academyand Applicationsof Sciences.(OSSA)Guidancereceivesto theadviceOSSAon Astrophysicsscientific strategyDivision,and in particular, is provided by dedicated Academy committees, ad hoc study groups and, at 10-year intervals, by broadly mandated astronomy and astrophysics survey committees charged with making recommen- dations for the coming decade. Many of the Academy's recommendations have important implications for the conduct of ultraviolet and visible-light astronomy from space. Moreover, these areas are now poised for an era of rapid growth. Through technological progress, ultraviolet astronomy has already risen from a novel observational technique four decades ago to the mainstream of astronomical research today. Recent developments in space technology and instrumen- tation have the potential to generate comparably dramatic strides in observational astronomy within the next 10 years. In 1989, the Ultraviolet and Visible Astrophysics Branch of the OSSA Astrophysics Division recognized the need for a new, long-range plan that would implement the Academy's recommendations in a way that yielded the most advantageous use of new technology. NASA's Ultraviolet, Visible, and Gravity Astrophysics Management Operations Working Group was asked to develop such a plan for the 1990s. Since the Branch holds programmatic responsibility for space research in gravitational physics and relativity, as well as for ultraviolet and visible-light astrophysics, missions in those areas were also included. -
00E the Construction of the Universe Symphony
The basic construction of the Universe Symphony. There are 30 asterisms (Suites) in the Universe Symphony. I divided the asterisms into 15 groups. The asterisms in the same group, lay close to each other. Asterisms!! in Constellation!Stars!Objects nearby 01 The W!!!Cassiopeia!!Segin !!!!!!!Ruchbah !!!!!!!Marj !!!!!!!Schedar !!!!!!!Caph !!!!!!!!!Sailboat Cluster !!!!!!!!!Gamma Cassiopeia Nebula !!!!!!!!!NGC 129 !!!!!!!!!M 103 !!!!!!!!!NGC 637 !!!!!!!!!NGC 654 !!!!!!!!!NGC 659 !!!!!!!!!PacMan Nebula !!!!!!!!!Owl Cluster !!!!!!!!!NGC 663 Asterisms!! in Constellation!Stars!!Objects nearby 02 Northern Fly!!Aries!!!41 Arietis !!!!!!!39 Arietis!!! !!!!!!!35 Arietis !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1056 02 Whale’s Head!!Cetus!! ! Menkar !!!!!!!Lambda Ceti! !!!!!!!Mu Ceti !!!!!!!Xi2 Ceti !!!!!!!Kaffalijidhma !!!!!!!!!!IC 302 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 990 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1024 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1026 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1070 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1085 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1107 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1137 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1143 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1144 !!!!!!!!!!NGC 1153 Asterisms!! in Constellation Stars!!Objects nearby 03 Hyades!!!Taurus! Aldebaran !!!!!! Theta 2 Tauri !!!!!! Gamma Tauri !!!!!! Delta 1 Tauri !!!!!! Epsilon Tauri !!!!!!!!!Struve’s Lost Nebula !!!!!!!!!Hind’s Variable Nebula !!!!!!!!!IC 374 03 Kids!!!Auriga! Almaaz !!!!!! Hoedus II !!!!!! Hoedus I !!!!!!!!!The Kite Cluster !!!!!!!!!IC 397 03 Pleiades!! ! Taurus! Pleione (Seven Sisters)!! ! ! Atlas !!!!!! Alcyone !!!!!! Merope !!!!!! Electra !!!!!! Celaeno !!!!!! Taygeta !!!!!! Asterope !!!!!! Maia !!!!!!!!!Maia Nebula !!!!!!!!!Merope Nebula !!!!!!!!!Merope -
Ngc Catalogue Ngc Catalogue
NGC CATALOGUE NGC CATALOGUE 1 NGC CATALOGUE Object # Common Name Type Constellation Magnitude RA Dec NGC 1 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:07:16 27:42:32 NGC 2 - Galaxy Pegasus 14.2 00:07:17 27:40:43 NGC 3 - Galaxy Pisces 13.3 00:07:17 08:18:05 NGC 4 - Galaxy Pisces 15.8 00:07:24 08:22:26 NGC 5 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:07:49 35:21:46 NGC 6 NGC 20 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 7 - Galaxy Sculptor 13.9 00:08:21 -29:54:59 NGC 8 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:08:45 23:50:19 NGC 9 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.5 00:08:54 23:49:04 NGC 10 - Galaxy Sculptor 12.5 00:08:34 -33:51:28 NGC 11 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.7 00:08:42 37:26:53 NGC 12 - Galaxy Pisces 13.1 00:08:45 04:36:44 NGC 13 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.2 00:08:48 33:25:59 NGC 14 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.1 00:08:46 15:48:57 NGC 15 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.8 00:09:02 21:37:30 NGC 16 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:04 27:43:48 NGC 17 NGC 34 Galaxy Cetus 14.4 00:11:07 -12:06:28 NGC 18 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:09:23 27:43:56 NGC 19 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:10:41 32:58:58 NGC 20 See NGC 6 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 21 NGC 29 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 22 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.6 00:09:48 27:49:58 NGC 23 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:53 25:55:26 NGC 24 - Galaxy Sculptor 11.6 00:09:56 -24:57:52 NGC 25 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.0 00:09:59 -57:01:13 NGC 26 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:10:26 25:49:56 NGC 27 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.5 00:10:33 28:59:49 NGC 28 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.8 00:10:25 -56:59:20 NGC 29 See NGC 21 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 30 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:10:51 21:58:39 -
100 Brightest Planetary Nebulae
100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE 100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE 1 100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE Visual Magnitude (brightest to least bright) Name Common Name Visual Magnitude Stellar Magnitude Angular Size Constellation NGC 7293 Helix Nebula 7 13.5 900 Aquarius NGC 6853 Dumbbell Nebula (M27) 7.5 13.9 330 Vulpecula NGC 3918 Blue Planetary 8 ? 16 Centaurus NGC 7009 Saturn Nebula 8 12.8 28 Aquarius NGC 3132 Eight‐Burst Planetary 8.5 10.1 45 Vela NGC 6543 Cat's Eye Nebula 8.5 11.1 20 Draco NGC 246 Skull Nebula 8.5 12 225 Cetus NGC 6572 Blue Raquetball Nebula 8.5 13.6 14 Ophiuchus NGC 6210 Turtle Nebula 9 12.7 16 Hercules NGC 6720 Ring Nebula (M57) 9 15.3 70 Lyra NGC 7027 Magic Carpet Nebula 9 16.3 14 Cygnus NGC 7662 Blue Snowball Nebula 9 13.2 20 Andromeda NGC 1360 Robin's Egg Nebula 9.5 11.4 380 Fornax NGC 1535 Cleopatra's Eye Nebula 9.5 12.2 18 Eridanus NGC 2392 Eskimo/Clown Face Nebula 9.5 10.5 45 Gemini NGC 2867 Royal Aqua Nebula 9.5 16.6 15 Carina NGC 3242 Ghost of Jupiter Nebula 9.5 12.3 40 Hydra NGC 6826 Blinking Planetary Nebula 9.5 10.4 25 Cygnus IC 418 Spirograph Nebula 10 10.2 12 Lepus NGC 5189 Spiral Planetary Nebula 10 14.9 140 Musca NGC 5882 Green Snowball Nebula 10 13.4 14 Lupus NGC 6818 Little Gem Nebula 10 16.9 18 Sagittarius NGC 40 Bow Tie Nebula 10.5 11.6 36 Cepheus NGC 1514 Crystal Ball Nebula 10.5 9.4 120 Taurus NGC 2346 Butterfly Nebula 10.5 11.5 55 Monoceros NGC 2438 Smoke Ring in M46 10.5 17.7 70 Puppis NGC 2440 Peanut Nebula 10.5 17.7 30 Puppis NGC 4361 Raven's Eye Nebula 10.5 13.2 100 Corvus IC 4406 Retina Nebula -
Arxiv:2001.08266V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 22 Jan 2020
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. aanda c ESO 2020 January 24, 2020 Searching for central stars of planetary nebulae in Gaia DR2 N. Chornay and N. A. Walton Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected], e-mail: [email protected] January 24, 2020 ABSTRACT Context. Accurate distance measurements are fundamental to the study of Planetary Nebulae (PNe) but have long been elusive. The most accurate and model-independent distance measurements for galactic PNe come from the trigonometric parallaxes of their central stars, which were only available for a few tens of objects prior to the Gaia mission. Aims. Accurate identification of PN central stars in the Gaia source catalogues is a critical prerequisite for leveraging the unprece- dented scope and precision of the trigonometric parallaxes measured by Gaia. Our aim is to build a complete sample of PN central star detections with minimal contamination. Methods. We develop and apply an automated technique based on the likelihood ratio method to match candidate central stars in Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) to known PNe in the HASH PN catalogue, taking into account the BP–RP colours of the Gaia sources as well as their positional offsets from the nebula centres. These parameter distributions for both true central stars and background sources are inferred directly from the data. Results. We present a catalogue of over 1000 Gaia sources that our method has automatically identified as likely PN central stars. We demonstrate how the best matches enable us to trace nebula and central star evolution and to validate existing statistical distance scales, and discuss the prospects for further refinement of the matching based on additional data. -
Southern Sky: Telescopic
Southern Sky: Telescopic - Caldwell - Binocular - Planetary Nebulae ID Other Desifnation Type RA Dec Con Size Mag CS B C NGC 104 47 Tucanae Gb 00 24 05.4 -72 04 51.9 Tuc 30.90 4.00 C NGC 121 ESO 50-SC12 Gb 00 26 48.0 -71 32 00.0 Tuc 1.50 10.60 99.90 126 Bet1Tuc * 00 31 32.7 -62 57 29.0 Tuc 4.37 127 Bet2Tuc * 00 31 33.6 -62 57 57.0 Tuc 4.54 NGC 292 SMC, Small Magellanic Cloud, Nubecula Minor Gx 00 52 36.0 -72 48 00.0 Tuc 319.10 2.30 14.00 NGC 330 OC 00 56 18.7 -72 27 45.0 Tuc 2.00 9.60 NGC 346 C+N 00 59 05.0 -72 10 36.0 Tuc 14.00 10.30 B C NGC 362 Gb 01 03 13.9 -70 50 53.9 Tuc 12.90 6.60 NGC 371 ESO 51-SC14 OC 01 03 30.0 -72 03 00.0 Tuc 7.50 13.80 99.90 NGC 419 Gb 01 08 17.3 -72 53 00.0 Tuc 2.60 10.00 B C NGC 1261 Gb 03 12 15.7 -55 12 57.1 Hor 6.90 8.40 NGC 1313 Topsy-Turvy Galaxy, Starburst Galaxy, ESO 82-11 Gx 03 20 05.4 -66 42 08.0 Ret 8.50 9.00 NGC 1549 Gx 04 15 45.0 -55 35 31.2 Dor 3.70 9.90 NGC 1553 Gx 04 16 10.5 -55 46 48.9 Dor 4.10 9.50 NGC 1566 Gx 04 20 00.5 -54 56 16.8 Dor 7.60 9.40 NGC 1763 IC 2115 OC 04 56 48.0 -66 25 00.0 Dor 25.00 99.90 99.90 NGC 1850 OC 05 08 44.9 -68 45 41.7 Dor 3.00 9.30 NGC 1955 C+N 05 26 10.0 -67 29 54.0 Dor 9.00 NGC 1962 C+N 05 26 19.0 -68 50 12.0 Dor 8.00 B C NGC 2070 Tarantula Nebula, Looped Nebula, 30 Doradus, True Lovers' Kn C+N 05 38 42.5 -69 06 03.3 Dor 40.00 8.20 NGC 2074 ESO 57-EN8 OC 05 39 06.0 -69 30 00.0 Dor 8.50 99.90 B C NGC 2516 OC 07 58 04.0 -60 45 12.0 Car 30.00 3.80 NGC 2547 OC 08 10 09.0 -49 12 54.0 Vel 20.00 4.70 B C IC 2391 Cr 191 OC 08 39 36.0 -52 55 00.0 Vel 60.00 2.50 99.90 IC -
A Catalogue of Integrated H-Alpha Fluxes for 1258 Galactic Planetary Nebulae
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–49 (2012) Printed 13 November 2012 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) A catalogue of integrated Hα fluxes for 1,258 Galactic planetary nebulae David J. Frew1,2⋆, Ivan S. Bojiˇci´c1,2,3 and Q.A. Parker1,2,3 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 2Research Centre in Astronomy, Astrophysics and Astrophotonics, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 3Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 915, North Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia Accepted ; Received ; in original form ABSTRACT We present a catalogue of new integrated Hα fluxes for 1258 Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe), with the majority, totalling 1234, measured from the Southern Hα Sky Survey Atlas (SHASSA) and/or the Virginia Tech Spectral-line Survey (VTSS). Aperture photometry on the continuum-subtracted digital images was performed to extract Hα+[N ii] fluxes in the case of SHASSA, and Hα fluxes from VTSS. The [N ii] contribution was then deconvolved from the SHASSA flux using spectrophotometric data taken from the literature or derived by us. Comparison with previous work shows that the flux scale presented here has no significant zero-point error. Our catalogue is the largest compilation of homogeneously derived PN fluxes in any waveband yet measured, and will be an important legacy and fresh benchmark for the community. Amongst its many applications, it can be used to determine statistical distances for these PNe, determine new absolute magnitudes for delineating the faint end of the PN luminosity function, provide baseline data for photoionization and hydrodynam- ical modelling, and allow better estimates of Zanstra temperatures for PN central stars with accurate optical photometry. -
MID-INFRARED INTERFEROMETRY of YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS: Detection of a Hot Component Inside the Circumbinary Cavity of V892 Tau
MID-INFRARED INTERFEROMETRY OF YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS: Detection of a hot component inside the circumbinary cavity of V892 Tau INAUGURAL-DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat¨ der Universitat¨ zu Koln¨ vorgelegt von Juan Andres´ Cahuasqu´ı Llerena aus Ambato, Ecuador Koln¨ 2019 Berichterstatter/in: Prof. Dr. Lucas Labadie Prof. Dr. Astrid Kiendler-Scharr Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 25. Oktober 2018 Abstract Stars are the essential elements of the universe that govern the evolution of galaxies and the interstellar medium. The star formation process carries two ubiquitous byproducts that dispose the excess of angular momentum: binary or higher-order stellar systems, and the formation of circumstellar disks surrounding most – if not all – stars. Although these two outputs embrace a wide field of astronomy by their own, the link between them seems to be a natural consequence. Namely, stellar and substellar companions forming multiple systems dynamically perturb primordial circumstellar disks and settle the conditions for planets to grow in such scenario. Due to their young age (<10 Myr) and observability after dispersing part of their gaseous and dusty envelope, the low-mass T Tauri (<2 M ) and the intermediate-mass Herbig Ae/Be (2–10 M ) stellar objects in the pre-main sequence phase are ideal laboratories to characterize protoplanetary disks. At this stage, observations with different techniques and at different wavelengths allow to investigate the star-disk environment through strong emission lines indicative of accretion of gas onto the central star, excess emission at infrared and longer wavelengths, and resolved thermal and scattered light. Additionally, a more advanced evolutionary stage in the so-called transition disks may be identified via dust-depleted cavities as consequence of forming planets, photoevaporation, self-shadowing or a dead zone inside the disk. -
High-Redshift Quasars and Their Host Galaxies I: Kinematical and Dynamical Properties and Their Tracers
MNRAS 000,1{20 (2018) Preprint 17 September 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 High-redshift quasars and their host galaxies I: kinematical and dynamical properties and their tracers Alessandro Lupi,1? Marta Volonteri,2 Roberto Decarli,3 Stefano Bovino,4 Joseph Silk,2;5;6;7 and Jacqueline Bergeron2 1Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy 2Sorbonne Universit`es, UPMC Univ Paris 6 et CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis bd Arago, F-75014 Paris, France 3INAF { Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Gobetti 93/3, I-40129, Bologna, Italy 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ Departamento de AstronomA a, Faculdad Ciencias FA sicas y MatemAaticas,, Universidad de ConcepciA¸sn, Av. Esteban Iturra s/n Barrio Universitario, Casilla 160, ConcepciA¸sn,~ Chile 5AIM-Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM/IRFU, CNRS, Univ Paris 7, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 7BIPAC, University of Oxford,1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK Draft 17 September 2019 ABSTRACT Observations of high-redshift quasars provide information on the massive black holes (MBHs) powering them and the galaxies hosting them. Current observations of z & 6 hosts, at sub-mm wavelengths, trace the properties of cold gas, and these are used to compare with the correlations between MBHs and galaxies characterising the z = 0 population. The relations at z = 0, however, rely on stellar-based tracers of the galaxy properties. We perform a very-high resolution cosmological zoom-in simulation of a z = 7 quasar including state-of-the-art non-equilibrium chemistry, MBH formation, growth and feedback, to assess the evolution of the galaxy host and the central MBH, and compare the results with recent ALMA observations of high-redshift quasars.