DOCSLIB.ORG

The Middlesex Natural Heritage Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Middlesex Natural Heritage Study 11.B.7 - CW OCTOBER 14, 2014 Page 1 of 121 Attachment 3 The Middlesex Natural Heritage Study A Natural Heritage Study to Identify Significant Woodland Patches in Middlesex County Prepared by: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority in cooperation with the Middlesex Natural Heritage Study Steering Committee Final Draft July 2003 11.B.7 - CW OCTOBER 14,T h 2014 e M i d d l e s e xPage N a t 2 u ofr a 121l H e r i t a g e S t u d yAttachment 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Coordination ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project phases ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Budget ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Study Area ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Methods .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Selection of Sites for Inventory ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Landowner Contact ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Field Survey Methods ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3.1 vascular plants ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.3.2 vegetation communities ........................................................................................................ 6 3.3.3 woodland patch type ............................................................................................................. 7 3.4 Field Data Entry and Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.4.1 database .................................................................................................................................. 8 3.5 Mapping and Geographical Information System Analysis .......................................................................... 8 3.5.1 update woodland patch layer ................................................................................................ 8 3.5.2 change in forest composition ................................................................................................ 9 3.5.3 spatial parameters .................................................................................................................. 9 3.6 Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................................................................10 4. Results and Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 11 4.1 Woodland Physiography .............................................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Landowner Contact ...................................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Change in Forest Composition .....................................................................................................................12 4.4 Field Survey Findings .................................................................................................................................. 13 4.4.1 vascular plants ..................................................................................................................... 13 4.4.2 vegetation communities .......................................................................................................18 4.4.3 woodland patch type ............................................................................................................23 4.5 Results of Mapping and GIS Analysis ........................................................................................................ 23 4.5.1 woodland patch size .............................................................................................................23 4.5.2 woodland patch interior .......................................................................................................23 4.5.3 forest connectivity ................................................................................................................23 4.6 Results of the Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................................26 4.6.1 native species richness .........................................................................................................26 4.6.2 non-native species richness ................................................................................................. 27 4.6.3 weediness ............................................................................................................................. 28 4.6.4 mean conservatism coefficient ............................................................................................28 4.6.5 basal area ..............................................................................................................................30 4.7 Summary of Key Results and Recommendations .......................................................................................30 42i 11.B.7 - CW OCTOBER 14,T h 2014 e M i d d l e s e xPage N a t 3 u ofr a 121l H e r i t a g e S t u d yAttachment 3 5. Identification of Significant Woodland Patches ............................................................................................... 32 5.1 Rationale for Landscape Criteria .................................................................................................................32 5.2 Development of Landscape Criteria ............................................................................................................33 5.2.1 criterion 1 ............................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.2 criterion 2 ............................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.3 criterion 3 ............................................................................................................................. 34 5.2.4 criterion 4 ............................................................................................................................. 35 5.2.5 criterion 5 ............................................................................................................................. 35 5.2.6 criterion 6 ............................................................................................................................. 36 5.3 Identification of Significant Woodlands ..................................................................................................... 36 5.4 Summary of Key Points and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 37 6. Implementation ..................................................................................................................................................... 38 6.1 Implementation Tools ...................................................................................................................................38 6.2 Land Use Planning ....................................................................................................................................... 38 7. References .............................................................................................................................................................. 39 8. Appendices Appendix 1 Landowner Contact Package .......................................................................................... A1-1 Appendix 2 Standard Field Data Forms ............................................................................................. A2-1 Appendix 3 Glossary ........................................................................................................................... A3-1 Appendix 4 Database Relationship Diagram ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
    ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Grasses and Grasslike Plants of the Oak Openings, Lucas County
    A LIST OF THE GRASSES AND GRASSLIKE PLANTS OF THE OAK OPENINGS, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO1 NATHAN WILLIAM EASTERLY Department of Biology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 4-3403 ABSTRACT This report is the second of a series of articles to be prepared as a second "Flora of the Oak Openings." The study represents a comprehensive survey of members of the Cyperaceae, Gramineae, Juncaceae, Sparganiaceae, and Xyridaceae in the Oak Openings region. Of the 202 species listed in this study, 34 species reported by Moseley in 1928 were not found during the present investigation. Fifty-seven species found by the present investi- gator were not observed or reported by Moseley. Many of these species or varieties are rare and do not represent a stable part of the flora. Changes in species present or in fre- quency of occurrence of species collected by both Moseley and Easterly may be explained mainly by the alteration of habitats as the Oak Openings region becomes increasingly urbanized or suburbanized. Some species have increased in frequency on the floodplain of Swan Creek, in wet ditches and on the banks of the Norfolk and Western Railroad right-of-way, along newly constructed roadsides, or on dry sandy sites. INTRODUCTION The grass family ranks third among the large plant families of the world. The family ranks number one as far as total numbers of plants that cover fields, mead- ows, or roadsides are concerned. No other family is used as extensively to pro- vide food or shelter or to create a beautiful landscape. The sedge family does not fare as well in terms of commercial importance, but the sedges do make avail- able forage and food for wild fowl and they do contribute plant cover in wet areas where other plants would not be as well adapted.
    [Show full text]
  • WETLAND PLANTS – Full Species List (English) RECORDING FORM
    WETLAND PLANTS – full species list (English) RECORDING FORM Surveyor Name(s) Pond name Date e.g. John Smith (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 (see your map) e.g. SP 1235 4325 (see your map) METHOD: wetland plants (full species list) survey Survey a single Focal Pond in each 1km square Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value using plants, by recording all wetland plant species present within the pond’s outer boundary. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from the extent of wetland vegetation (for example a ring of rushes growing at the pond’s outer edge), or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. After your survey please enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Stonewort, Bristly (Chara hispida) Bistort, Amphibious (Persicaria amphibia) Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) Stonewort, Clustered (Tolypella glomerata) Crystalwort, Channelled (Riccia canaliculata) Arrowhead, Canadian (Sagittaria rigida) Stonewort, Common (Chara vulgaris) Crystalwort, Lizard (Riccia bifurca) Arrowhead, Narrow-leaved (Sagittaria subulata) Stonewort, Convergent (Chara connivens) Duckweed , non-native sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures
    Zootaxa 3729 (1): 001–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3729.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0C1355-FF3E-4C67-8F48-544B2166AF2A ZOOTAXA 3729 Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures JASON J. DOMBROSKIE1,2,3 & FELIX A. H. SPERLING2 1Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Ithaca, NY, USA, 14853-2601. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E9 3Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Brown: 2 Sept. 2013; published: 25 Oct. 2013 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 JASON J. DOMBROSKIE & FELIX A. H. SPERLING Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures (Zootaxa 3729) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 25 Oct. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-288-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-289-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3729 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press DOMBROSKIE & SPERLING Table of contents Abstract . 3 Material and methods . 6 Results . 18 Discussion . 23 Conclusions . 33 Acknowledgements . 33 Literature cited . 34 APPENDIX 1. 38 APPENDIX 2. 44 Additional References for Appendices 1 & 2 . 49 APPENDIX 3. 51 APPENDIX 4. 52 APPENDIX 5.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • Carex of New England
    Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley A Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club About the Author: Lisa A. Standley is an environmental consultant. She obtained a B.S, and M.S. from Cornell University and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. She has published several articles on the systematics of Carex, particularly Section Phacocystis, and was the author of several section treatments in the Flora of North America. Cover Illustrations: Pictured are Carex pensylvanica and Carex intumescens. Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club Copyright © 2011 Lisa A. Standley Acknowledgements This book is dedicated to Robert Reed, who first urged me to write a user-friendly guide to Carex; to the memory of Melinda F. Denton, my mentor and inspiration; and to Tony Reznicek, for always sharing his expertise. I would like to thank all of the people who helped with this book in so many ways, particularly Karen Searcy and Robert Bertin for their careful editing; Paul Somers, Bruce Sorrie, Alice Schori, Pam Weatherbee, and others who helped search for sedges; Arthur Gilman, Melissa Dow Cullina, and Patricia Swain, who carefully read early drafts of the book; and to Emily Wood, Karen Searcy, and Ray Angelo, who provided access to the herbaria at Harvard University, the University of Massachusetts, and the New England Botanical Club. CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Asteraceae: Senecioneae) Ekaterina D
    © © Landesmuseum für Kärnten; download www.landesmuseum.ktn.gv.at/wulfenia; www.zobodat.at Wulfenia 21 (2014): 111–118 Mitteilungen des Kärntner Botanikzentrums Klagenfurt Re-considerations on Senecio oxyriifolius DC. and S. tropaeolifolius MacOwan ex F. Muell. (Asteraceae: Senecioneae) Ekaterina D. Malenkova, Lyudmila V. Ozerova, Ivan A. Schanzer & Alexander C. Timonin Summary: Analyses of ITS1-2 data from a comprehensive sample of African succulent species of Senecio and related genera reveals that Senecio tropaeolifolius, though closely related to S. oxyriifolius, should be treated as a separate species. According to our results, it may be one of the parental species to S. kleiniiformis, a widely cultivated ornamental of uncertain hybrid origin. Keywords: Asteraceae, Senecioneae, taxonomy, systematics, Senecio kleiniiformis, ITS1-2 Senecio tropaeolifolius MacOwan ex F. Muell. is a widely cultivated succulent ornamental (Brickell 2003) whose taxonomic rank has remained uncertain so far. Its similarity to S. oxyriifolius DC. was mentioned in its first description (Mueller 1867) and Rowley (1994, 2002) rendered it as a subspecies of the latter one. However, Jeffrey (1986, 1992) treated these allopatric (Fig. 1) taxa, S. tropaeolifolius and S. oxyriifolius, as two separate species in the section Peltati. According to their descriptions, these two species differ mainly in their growth form, the number of involucral bracts of the capitula, the number of florets in the capitula, the presence/absence of ray florets and bristles on cypselae. All these characters are rather variable amongSenecio L. s. latiss. and their taxonomic value is questionable. Molecular data drastically changed the understanding of taxonomy and phylogeny of Senecio and related genera (Pelser et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Baseline Study Area Vegetation Inventories
    ATTACHMENT 12-IIC TERRESTRIAL BASELINE STUDY AREA VEGETATION INVENTORIES LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Plant Community Types Identified in the Terrestrial Baseline Study Area ..................................... 1 February 2018 Project No. 1536607/2000/2219 i ATTACHMENT 12-IIC TERRESTRIAL BASELINE STUDY AREA VEGETATION INVENTORIES Table 1: Plant Community Types Identified in the Terrestrial Baseline Study Area Plant Community Type Scientific Name(a) Common Name(b) Origin(b) Status(b) G Rank(c) S Rank(c) NE1 NE4 NW5 NE6c NE10 NE11 NE17 NE18 NE20 NW13 NW16 NW17 NW21 NW27 NW29 NW32 NW33 NW34 NW35 NW44 NW45 NE5m NE13r Thicket Swamp Graminoid Marsh Graminoid Trees (12 taxa) Abies balsamea Balsam fir N NAR G5 S5 X X X - X X X X - X - X - X X X X X X X X X X X - Betula papyrifera White birch N NAR G5 S5 X X X - X X - X X X - X X X X X X X X X X X X X - Fraxinus nigra Black ash N NAR G5 S4 - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - Larix laricina Tamarack N NAR G5 S5 - - - - - - X - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - X X Picea glauca White spruce N NAR G5 S5 X - - - - - - - - - - - - X - X X X X X - X - - - Picea mariana Black spruce N NAR G5 S5 X X X - X X X X X X - X X X X - X X - X X X X X - Pinus banksiana Jack pine N NAR G5 S5 X - - X - - - - X - - - X X - - - - - - - - - - - Pinus strobus White pine N NAR G5 S5 - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - Populus Balsam poplar N NAR G5 S5 - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - balsamifera Populus nigra Black poplar I NAR G5 SNA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Patierns of Specialization
    APPENDIX: PATIERNS OF SPECIALIZATION Statistical rationale progress, a second variant of cluster analysis may be considered more appropriate here. In optimal (non-hierarchical) clustering, A variety of ways is available for exploring axes or groupings the analysis sorts the species into a variable number of internally­ within multivariate data sets. Principal components analysis, for homogeneous clusters. Group properties of the cluster then example, would identify any axes of specialization to which the become equally important as properties of their individual different attributes might variously contribute, both in kind and in members, and the analysis will not necessarily produce the same degree. However, the most suitable indication arises from the outcome as would an hierarchical analysis into the same number assumption that the values of certain attributes for a particular of clusters. group of species have evolved through simultaneous selection-a This is the approach which we, and Grime eta/. (1987), have composite response on the part of several attributes to a set of followed. They are both successive instances of a 'rolling external environmental pressures. Further, these sets of attributes synthesis', a research strategy which periodically draws together may well have evolved in such a way that coherent groupings of the current state of quantitative knowledge of native plant species species which possess them can now be identified, each with into a statistical and comparative overview. characteristic values, or ranges of values, for each of the attributes. This being so, a cluster analysis is indicated. Two variants of cluster analysis exist. The first employs a The current database hierarchical method in which each species belongs initially to its own separate class.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Non-Native Plants in Alaska
    Identification of Non -native Plants in Alaska 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, AK 99508 Spring 2019 INTRODUCTION Suggested citation: Flagstad, L., Cortes-Burns, H., and Greenstein, C. 2019. Identification of Non-native Plants in Alaska. Alaska Natural Heritage Program, University of Alaska Anchorage. 219 pp. Contributions from: Matthew Carlson Justin Fulkerson Bonnie Bernard Helen Klein Miriah Phelps Timm Nawrocki Irina Lapina Natalie Konig Financial support from: Duplication of hardcopy or digital AKNHP products with the intent to sell is prohibited without written consent by AKNHP. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... 3 AKNHP ............................................................................................................... 4 AKEPIC............................................................................................................... 5 Concepts of Invasiveness and Ranking ............................................................... 6 IPM ...................................................................................................................... 7 How to Use this Guide ........................................................................................ 8 Plant Morphology ................................................................................................ 9 Asteraceae ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Strategic Management Plan for Invasive Species
    New Jersey Strategic Management Plan for Invasive Species The Recommendations of the New Jersey Invasive Species Council to Governor Jon S. Corzine Pursuant to New Jersey Executive Order #97 Vision Statement: “To reduce the impacts of invasive species on New Jersey’s biodiversity, natural resources, agricultural resources and human health through prevention, control and restoration, and to prevent new invasive species from becoming established.” Prepared by Michael Van Clef, Ph.D. Ecological Solutions LLC 9 Warren Lane Great Meadows, New Jersey 07838 908-637-8003 908-528-6674 [email protected] The first draft of this plan was produced by the author, under contract with the New Jersey Invasive Species Council, in February 2007. Two subsequent drafts were prepared by the author based on direction provided by the Council. The final plan was approved by the Council in August 2009 following revisions by staff of the Department of Environmental Protection. Cover Photos: Top row left: Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar); Photo by NJ Department of Agriculture Top row center: Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora); Photo by Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org Top row right: Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica); Photo by Troy Evans, Eastern Kentucky University, Bugwood.org Middle row left: Mile-a-Minute (Polygonum perfoliatum); Photo by Jil M. Swearingen, USDI, National Park Service, Bugwood.org Middle row center: Canadian Thistle (Cirsium arvense); Photo by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org Middle row right: Asian
    [Show full text]