DOCSLIB.ORG

Response F11-426

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response F11-426 Response F11-426 House of Commons – list of works of art with prices View of Chevening, oil painting by Marcus May £24,675 Portrait bust of Sir Alec Douglas Home, bronze by Angela Conner £15,000 Maquette of Margaret Thatcher statue, bronze by Antony Dufort £11,750 Portrait bust of Sir John Major, bronze by Anne Curry £ 6,000 Portrait of Kenneth Clarke, oil on canvas by James Lloyd £ 8,000 Views of the Clock Tower and Victoria Tower, prints from Illustrated London News £ 8.74 James Ramsay MacDonald, sketch by Harold Storey £ 48.23 Clement Atlee, sketch by Juliett Pannett and Lord Rowton by Spy £ 650 Series of 43 photographs of parliamentarians by Jane Bown £ 6,450 View of Westminster Bridge, watercolour £ 85 Portrait of Speaker William Bromley, oil on canvas by Michael Dahl £2,000 Portrait of Sir John Scott, oil on canvas by Karl Hickel £4,693 Sketch for ‘Burial of the unknown soldier’ oil o canvas by Frank O’Salisbury £ 705.75 Sir Winston Churchill, caricature £ 850 Portrait of Baroness Williams, oil on canvas by Victoria Russell £ 8,000 Contribution towards the purchase of the following works £50,000 - Portrait of Baron Holland, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, - Series of 14 caricatures by Gillray, the “French Habits” - Marble bust of Fox by Nollekens - Portrait sketch of Fox by Samuel Cotes - Charcoal portrait of John Eliot Burns - Seven Vanity Fair caricatures of Disraeli etc - Painting of the “Churchill Arch” by Beresford Portrait of William Windham, oil on canvas after Sir Thomas Lawrence £1,000 The Election series, set of four engravings by William Hogarth £3,500 The New Union Club, engraving by George Cruikshank £2,700 Interior of St Stephen’s, sketch by H. Humphrey, 1802 £ 850 Portrait of 1st Baron Sandys of Ombersley, oil on canvas by Sir Godfrey Kneller £12,500 Emmeline Pankhurst, Medal of Honour awarded 1908 £22,000 Series of 25 photographs of parliamentarians, by Jane Bown £3,749.58 Portrait of Ernest Bevin £ 200 Portrait of Stephen Lushington, oil on canvas by Abraham Wivell £ 3,375.78 Portrait of David Alfred Thomas, 1st Viscount Rhondda, oil on canvas by I G Olinsky £ 1,121.05 Portrait of Tony Blair, oil on canvas by Phil Hale £10,000 The Election Oil on canvas by C F Wicksteed £6,500 Selection of 12 engravings by Cruikshank £2,723.92 View of the Old Palace of Westminster, watercolour by William Capon and Two Views of St Stephen’s Chapel, watercolour by George Moore £7,762.50 Portrait of William Coventry, oil on canvas attributed to Mary Beale £12,500 View of old Palace Yard, watercolour by Thomas Malton £30,000 Four women MPs, photographs by Kieran Doherty £ 741.21 Portrait of William Gladstone, oil on canvas by Franz von Lenbach £16,379.86 Winston Churchill, lithograph by Robert Austin £ 1,500 Sir Robert Peel, bust by Matthew Noble £ 5,594 Stanley Baldwin, pencil drawing by Frances Dodd £3,254.50 Portrait of Sir George Cornewall Lewis, oil on canvas by Sir Francis Grant £ 2,006.27 Selection of 17 satirical prints by various artists £2,645 Menzies Campbell, oil on canvas by Victoria Crowe £10, 346 Michael Howard, oil on canvas by Richard Stone £ 9,300 Seven parliamentarians, photographs by Amit Lennon £ 4,719.85 Andrew Bonar Law, bust by John E. Hyett £ 5,914.98 Baroness Thatcher , Maquette by Antony Dufort £3,162.50 Portrait bust of Benjamin Disraeli , marble by Count Gleichen £4,552.50 James Ramsay MacDonald, two photographic prints by Mrs Galsworthy £ 738 40 original prints by Robert Taverner, Richard Beer, Michael Kirkman, Andy Lovell £10,470 and Joyce Pallot The Westminster Election, watercolour by George Scharf £6,420 ‘Tatlin to the Tower’ and ‘Lambeth’ two etchings by Chris Orr £2,475 ‘Mother of All Parliaments’, etching by Chris Orr £1,725 Speaker Lowther, portrait by Frank Salisbury £432 Silver Holloway Prison Brooch £2,750 ‘Funny turns and deviations’, screenprint by Martin Grover £ 395 Selection of 19 satirical prints, coloured engravings by James Gillray and other artists £5,000 View of Henry VII Chapel from entrance to the Tally Court’, watercolour by James Miller £12,000 Portrait of John Pym, oil after Edward Bower £2,500 View of interior of Westminster Hall, watercolour £621 Portrait of Ian Paisley, oil on canvas by Mark Shields £10,000 Portrait bust of Henry Campbell Bannerman, bronze by Martin Jennings £9,200 Portrait bust of Jeremy Thorpe, bronze by Avril Vellacott £10,380 Exterior View of Portcullis House, Oil on canvas by Julian Barrow £2,031.25 Election Banner for Darlington Election, John Pease £ 800 Thomas Wentworth Beaumont commemorative Election mug £1,024.78 Joseph Chamberlain, portrait by William Nicholson £ 190 Five parliamentarians by photographer Nick Ray £ 4,000 Liaison Committee, Works of Art Committee and female Secretaries of State, £5,770.98 portrait photograph by John Ferguson Election Artist Commission 2010, by Simon Roberts £38,764.78 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato
    “To Hell or Connaught:” How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato Famine The Irish potato famine is well-known for the suffering and death it inflicted upon the masses of Irish peasantry between 1845 and 1848. The famine is often remembered and mourned as the tragic but unavoidable result of natural circumstances, and the blight that swept through the potato crop year after year is attributed as the sole cause of starvation. This misrepresentation of the famine’s history ignores the role of the British colonizer state in establishing conditions in Ireland that led to famine and exacerbating the suffering of the Irish through neglect. This paper explores the role of the British colonial government in Ireland in causing and amplifying the negative impacts of the Irish potato famine. Lewis 2 “To Hell or Connaught:” How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato Famine Ruby Lewis PSU Challenge History of Modern Europe April 15, 2021 The Irish potato famine is undeniably one of the greatest tragedies in Ireland’s turbulent and bloodstained history. One million people—roughly one-eighth of Ireland’s Lewis 3 population—perished of starvation between 1845 and 1848, and another two million were forced to flee the country in search of a safer life elsewhere.1 Those who remained piled into disease-ridden, overcrowded workhouses or scraped out a living on meager plots of land. Too frequently, the famine is portrayed by historians as the inevitable outcome of population increase and unfortunate natural circumstances. In reality, the Great Hunger was the result of British conquest and subsequent neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • Harpton Court Estate Records, (GB 0210 HARPTON)
    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Harpton Court Estate Records, (GB 0210 HARPTON) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 03, 2017 Printed: May 03, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH This description follows NLW guidelines based on ISAD(G) Second Edition; AACR2; and LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/harpton-court-estate-records archives.library .wales/index.php/harpton-court-estate-records Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Harpton Court Estate Records, Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................. 4 Nodiadau | Notes ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone and the Bank of England: a Study in Mid-Victorian Finance, 1833-1866
    GLADSTONE AND THE BANK OF ENGLAND: A STUDY IN MID-VICTORIAN FINANCE, 1833-1866 Patricia Caernarv en-Smith, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Laura Stern, Committee Member Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Caernarven-Smith, Patricia. Gladstone and the Bank of England: A Study in Mid- Victorian Finance, 1833-1866. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 378 pp., 11 tables, bibliography, 275 titles. The topic of this thesis is the confrontations between William Gladstone and the Bank of England. These confrontations have remained a mystery to authors who noted them, but have generally been ignored by others. This thesis demonstrates that Gladstone’s measures taken against the Bank were reasonable, intelligent, and important for the development of nineteenth-century British government finance. To accomplish this task, this thesis refutes the opinions of three twentieth-century authors who have claimed that many of Gladstone’s measures, as well as his reading, were irrational, ridiculous, and impolitic. My primary sources include the Gladstone Diaries, with special attention to a little-used source, Volume 14, the indexes to the Diaries. The day-to-day Diaries and the indexes show how much Gladstone read about financial matters, and suggest that his actions were based to a large extent upon his reading. In addition, I have used Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates and nineteenth-century periodicals and books on banking and finance to understand the political and economic debates of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces by Robert Blake
    Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces By Robert Blake Disraeli and Gladstone were both politicians of extraordinary ability - but their personalities clashed and they heartily loathed each other. Robert Blake, the British constitutional historian, compares their political careers, and charts their stormy relationship. Mutual dislike In the general election of 1 April 1880, the Conservative party under Benjamin Disraeli was crushingly defeated by the Liberals (known as Whigs) - under William Gladstone. Lord Granville, a moderate Whig, wrote to Queen Victoria who would, he knew, be bitterly disappointed by the decision of the electorate: 'Lord Beaconsfield [Disraeli] and Mr Gladstone are men of extraordinary ability; they dislike each other more than is usual among public men. Of no other politician Lord Beaconsfield would have said in public that his conduct was worse than those who had committed the Bulgarian atrocities. He has the power of saying in two words that which drives a person of Mr Gladstone's peculiar temperament into a state of great excitement.' There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. Disraeli referred to his rival in a letter to Lord Derby as '...that unprincipled maniac Gladstone - extraordinary mixture of envy, vindictiveness, hypocrisy and superstition'. And Gladstone more moderately said of his old enemy, 'the Tory party had principles by which it would and did stand for bad and for good. All this Dizzy destroyed'. When Lord Granville wrote to Queen Victoria, Disraeli, born in 1804, had one more year to live; Gladstone, who was born in 1810, had another eighteen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corn Laws
    The Corn Laws After the end of the Napoleonic Wars it was feared that cheap foreign grain would flood the British market and that domestic producers would suffer financially. The first of the Corn Laws was introduced by the British Government in 1815 to protect domestic landowners and farmers from this threat. The high tariffs imposed made it too expensive to import grain, even when domestic supplies were in short supply. The price of bread increased and rioting was not uncommon. Eventually, despite strong opposition from his own party, Conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel successfully repealed the law in 1846. On display here is a selection of documents relating to the Corn Laws, including a political cartoon and election broadsheets (the topic featured prominently in election campaigns). The Anti-Corn Law League, a political movement set up in 1836, fought to abolish the Corn Laws and produced the innovative free-trade sticker seen here on an envelope dating from 1842. All the documents presented here are held by the University of Nottingham at Manuscripts and Special Collections. The University collects archival material relating to the history of the University itself and its predecessor bodies, including the Midland Agricultural and Dairy College, the history of the East Midlands, and the research interests of the University. Over three million items are stored at Kings Meadow Campus. For more information on any of the items in the display or to arrange a visit to the Reading Room at Kings Meadow Campus visit www.nottingham.ac.uk/mss or email [email protected] Cartoon entitled 'Political Balance', December 1816 The Fagan Collection of Political Prints and Caricatures, Pol P 25 This political cartoon depicts the 'Constitution' as an ill-balanced set of scales with the prices of basic foodstuffs rising on one side (well out of reach of the starving working man) and the 'coffin' bearing 'Old England' (weighed down by the Corn Bills) disappearing into the 'abyss of corruption' on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 40-Autumn 2003.Indd
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 40 / Autumn 2003 / £5.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Heir to the New Liberals? Ed Randall John Rawls Appreciation of a Liberal philosopher Patrick Jackson, Ian Crowe Biographies Loulou Harcourt and Edmund Burke J. Graham Jones ‘A real triumph for my old friend’ The Times fooled by Lloyd George interview Adrian Slade Architect of political realism Interview with David Steel David Boyle Hilaire Belloc and the Liberal revival Distributism revisited Liberal Democrat History Group TEN YEARS OF LIBERAL HISTORY his issue of the Journal of Our underlying aim has never How they Liberal History, number 40, really changed, though – to pro- used to look: Tmarks the tenth anniversary mote the study and research of Newsletter of the publication originally Liberal history, whether relating number 1, known as the Liberal Democrat to the Liberal Party, SDP, Liberal Newsletter History Group Newsletter, then the Democrats or, more broadly, 10 – our first Journal of Liberal Democrat History, British (and sometimes foreign) special, on and operating under its current Liberalism. We wanted both to ‘Liberals title since the beginning of 2003. remind party members of their and the First I think it is true to say that party’s history, and to promote World War’ those of us involved in launching its study and research – generally – and the the Liberal Democrat History a neglected topic – amongst all first Journal Group in 1988 – inspired by the those interested, whether aca- of Liberal Liberal History Group in the demics or not. Democrat pre-merger Liberal Party – had We hope you find the Journal History, no idea that we would end up of Liberal History helps you in one nunber 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of Peel of One of Britain’S Most Eminent Nineteenth-Century Politicians, It Is Richard A
    REviEWS Liberal Unionist Party were more that individuals made to their party Richard A. Gaunt’s interest- involved in running government no matter how irrational their aspi- ing new work Sir Robert Peel: The than developing their party after rations had become. Life and Legacy is not such a book. 1895. Chamberlain’s explosive radi- The legacy of Liberal Union- Gaunt discusses the various facets cal ideas could hurt his friends as ism was not limited to the subtle of Peel’s political career and tries much as his enemies, as he dem- changes in Conservatism manifest to address the question of Peel’s onstrated between 1903 and 1906. right up till the Second World War, principles and convictions. How- The party had failed to establish if not beyond, but was also evident ever, he finally shrinks from being itself outside its original enclaves in the pioneering campaigning explicit about them. He finds virtue and, once it had rejected the idea of methods the new party employed in in the different interpretations and reunion with the Gladstonians, it its struggle to survive. Dr Cawood does not let the reader know where became progressively more prob- hints at the scope for more work he stands personally. In fact, his lematic to envisage escaping the that can, and I hope, will be done to book is neither an extended biog- not always friendly Tory embrace. explore this. His book is much to be raphy nor at least an exploration of Cawood suggests that the pro- welcomed and from now on those Peel’s political thought, but, rather, longed engagement from the for- interested in the period will need to an informative account of the mul- mation of the 1895 government to engage with his findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Report
    Breakthrough Britain A Force to be Reckoned With A Policy Report by the Policing Reform Working Group Chaired by Ray Mallon March 2009 About the Centre for Social Justice The Centre for Social Justice aims to put social justice at the heart of British politics. Our policy development is rooted in the wisdom of those working to tackle Britain’s deepest social problems and the experience of those whose lives have been affected by poverty. Our working groups are non-partisan, comprising prominent academics, practitioners and policy makers who have expertise in the relevant fields. We consult nationally and internationally, especially with charities and social enterprises, who are the the champions of the welfare society. In addition to policy development, the CSJ has built an alliance of poverty fighting organisations that reverse social breakdown and transform communities. We believe that the surest way the Government can reverse social breakdown and poverty is to enable such individuals, communities and voluntary groups to help themselves. The CSJ was founded by Iain Duncan Smith in 2004, as the fulfilment of a promise made to Janice Dobbie, whose son had recently died from a drug overdose just after he was released from prison. Chairman: Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP Executive Director: Philippa Stroud Breakthrough Britain: A Force to be Reckoned With © The Centre for Social Justice, 2009 Published by the Centre for Social Justice, 9 Westminster Palace Gardens, Artillery Row, SW1P 1RL www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk ISBN: 978-0-9556999-9-3 Designed by SoapBox, www.soapboxcommunications.co.uk This report represents the views of the working group as a whole and does not reflect at every point the individual opinion of each and every working group member.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Constitution: Walter Bagehot
    The English Constitution: Walter Bagehot MILES TAYLOR Editor OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS ’ THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION W B was born in Langport, Somerset, in , the son of a banker. After taking BA and MA degrees from University College London he studied for the bar, and was called in . However, he decided to return home and join his father’s bank, devoting his leisure to contributing literary, historical and political reviews to the leading periodicals of the s. In he returned to London, succeeding his father-in-law as editor and director of the Economist. Three books ensured Bagehot’s reputation as one of the most distinguished and influential Victorian men-of-letters: The English Constitution (), published at the height of the debate over parliamentary reform; Physics and Politics (), his application of Darwinian ideas to political science; and Lombard Street (), a study of the City of London. Walter Bagehot died in . M T is a Lecturer in Modern History at King’s College, London. He is the author of The Decline of British Radicalism, – (Clarendon Press, ) and is currently completing a biography of the last Chartist leader, Ernest Jones. ’ For almost years Oxford World’s Classics have brought readers closer to the world’s great literature. Now with over titles–– from the ,-year-old myths of Mesopotamia to the twentieth century’s greatest novels–– the series makes available lesser-known as well as celebrated writing. The pocket-sized hardbacks of the early years contained introductions by Virginia Woolf, T. S. Eliot, Graham Greene, and other literary figures which enriched the experience of reading.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Democratic Peace Author(S): Christopher Layne Reviewed Work(S): Source: International Security, Vol
    Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace Author(s): Christopher Layne Reviewed work(s): Source: International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Autumn, 1994), pp. 5-49 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539195 . Accessed: 19/10/2012 09:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security. http://www.jstor.org Kant or Cant ChristopherLayne The Myth of the Democratic Peace lThe theory of the "Democratic Peace" raises important theoretical issues:' the contention that democratic states behave differently toward each other than toward non- democracies cuts to the heart of the international relations theory debate about the relative salience of second-image (domestic politics) and of third- image (systemic structure) explanations of international political outcomes. Democratic peace theory has also come to have a real-world importance as well: Policymakers who have embraced democratic peace theory see a crucial link between America's security and the spread of democracy, which is viewed as the antidote that will prevent future wars. Indeed some democratic peace theorists, notably Bruce Russett, believe that in an international system comprising a critical mass of democratic states, "It may be possible in part to supersede the 'realist' principles (anarchy, the security dilemma of states) that have dominated practice to the exclusion of 'liberal' or 'idealist' ones since at least the seventeenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill and the Historians
    Canadian Military History Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 20 1993 Churchill and the Historians Robert Vogel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Vogel, Robert "Churchill and the Historians." Canadian Military History 2, 2 (1993) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vogel: Churchill and the Historians More seriously but not Copp's First (of which Lord Balfour so aptly fault there is a major problem with Churchill said; "I hear that he has written a the transcription of French names. big book about himself and called it Major Leon Brosseau, D Company and the 'The World Crisis."'). Apparently commander, killed in action, is everyone whoever talked to him or referred to as Lucien. Killed in the saw him in the distance has left same action is the mortar platoon Historians behind some clever entry in his commander, Captain Orieux, diary or memoirs. Consequently referred to in the book as Oriens. A Robert Vogel there exists an absolute treasure friend of this reviewer, Major Alex trove of material from which to Angers, shot through the throat, is mine endless quotations by which referred to as Alexander not as Robert Blake & Roger Louis, eds. one can prove a variety of likely Alexandre, which is his real name. Churchill: A Major Reassessment of his and not so likely interpretations of These may seem small errors.but Life in Peace and War.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]