Toronto Ravines Study 1977 to 2017 Short
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Toronto Ravines Study: 1977-2017 Long-term Changes in the Biodiversity and Ecological Integrity of Toronto’s Ravines Eric Davies, Anqi Dong, Catherine Berka, Paul Scrivener, Dale Taylor, Sandy M Smith Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto - July 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have come into being without the work of the many individuals who dedicated endless volunteer hours to its realization. Our thanks to: The originators of the 1977 study, our co-authors Paul Scrivener and Dale Taylor, for sticking with the project over the past 40 years, and for getting it going again. Dale and Paul provided the team with a real-life example of ‘citizen science’ in action, and a generational timeline to the past. They made this project an adventure for all of us. Good stewardship of the land is a lifelong affair, and Dale and Paul have exemplified that commitment beyond all expectations. Esther McNeil for walking into the University of Toronto, Faculty of Forestry six years ago and asking: “How can I help save the Toronto ravines?” Esther inspired us to start working in the Toronto ravines, which ultimately led to this project, this report, and a renewed interest in ravine conservation. Catherine Berka for jumping with two feet into this project from day one, and for providing an endless source of positivity, leadership, humour, community outreach, and every day hard work. The project would simply not be what it is today without the heart and soul of our other co-author, Catherine. This project has benefited tremendously from the expertise, cooperation, and guidance of many people, especially in The City of Toronto, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, local nature groups, and countless citizens. Our most sincere appreciation to those private sponsors whose support allowed us to turn this initiative into an inspirational and useful tool for guiding the future restoration of Toronto’s ravines. Our private donors provided much more than simply funds to make this project happen – most importantly, they provided a sense of local accountability. The only meaningful deliverable required of donations is a job well done. Our team put their hearts and souls into this project for three years in the hope that the donors would see our work as such. We are sincerely grateful for this unique opportunity and hope our donors see the report as a source of pride that will inspire others to follow their lead. The following is a partial list of those donors who provided private funding supported this initiative: Anne McConnell; Dez Capital; Jannie and Paul Mills; Manulife; Martha Rogers; Pixie and Neil Shaw; Sandra and James Pitblado; Craigellachie Holdings, Paul Scrivener, The Dalglish Family; and The Gerald Schwartz & Heather Reisman Foundation. 1 The Toronto Ravine Revitalization Study (TRRS) Team Eric Davies Anqi Dong, Master of Forest Sandy M. Smith PhD Student, MSc, BSc Conservation (MFC), HBSc PhD, FRES, Professor Alex Stepniak Jane Michener Jay Malcolm, MFC, HBSc MFC, BA PhD, Professor Profes Paul Scrivener Dale Taylor Catherine Berka Coordinator of The Rosedale Coordinator of The Rosedale Ravine resident; Ravines Study 1977; Ravines Study 1977; Coordinator of the Toronto Fundraiser of the Toronto Fundraiser of the Toronto Ravine Revitalization Ravine Revitalization Study Ravine Revitalization Study Study 2015-2018 2015-2018 2015-2018 2 8 July 2018 As Dean of the Faculty of Forestry and a member of the University of Toronto whose President’s house sits on one of Toronto’s inner ravines, I welcome the completion of this Report of the Toronto Ravine Revitalization Study, 2015-2018. This work was conducted by graduate students under the supervision of academic staff in the Faculty of Forestry and guided by a steering committee of researchers, faculty members, and community ravine leaders. It was also community funded through the efforts of the Steering Committee, with the assistance of the university administration. The study, which breaks new ground in urban forestry, has signal importance in updating a baseline study of the Rosedale ravines done in 1977, also conducted by University of Toronto graduate students under faculty supervision, and similarly funded by the community. The methodology enabled systematic and dramatic depiction of changes over time in the subject ravines. I share the basic assumption of the study, which was also recently adopted as policy direction by the Toronto City Council, that Toronto’s ravines should continue to be “fundamentally natural areas.” The study’s principle findings are unfortunately that the ravines are in long-term ecological decline. Its recommendations for action to reverse this decline deserve and require urgent attention. I think this work is especially commendable as a model for university-community research and interaction. It shows what can be done in partnership with the public to bring university knowledge and science to important applications within our host communities. Well done TRRS! Professor Rob Wright, Dean 3 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. 1 The Toronto Ravine Revitalization Study (TRRS) Team.................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 6 Study Achievements ............................................................................................ 7 Science ....................................................................................................... 7 Policy ......................................................................................................... 7 Practice ...................................................................................................... 8 Citizen Engagement (Citizen Science) ...................................................... 8 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 9 The Toronto Ravines - An Extraordinary Urban Ecosystem ............................. 9 Toronto’s Indigenous People – The Origins of Land Stewardship .................... 9 Toronto’s Faculty of Forestry - A Century of Ecosystem Science .................. 10 Toronto’s Citizen Science - A Century of Citizen Science .............................. 11 The Theme - Adaptive Management ................................................................ 11 The Timeline - The Past, Present & Future of Toronto’s Ravines ................... 12 MAIN FINDINGS ........................................................................................................... 13 Component Studies Findings - An Ecosystem in Decline ............................... 13 1. Low ‘Ecological Integrity’ in the ravine forests ............................... 14 2. Low ‘Ecological Integrity’ in ravine small mammal and breeding bird communities ...................................................................................... 14 3. Low ‘Ecological Integrity’ in ravine understory vegetation ............. 14 4. Ravine policies need more explicit language and stronger enforcement ....................................................................................... 15 4 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 16 1. Adopt ‘Ecological Integrity’ as the guiding principal and policy of the Toronto Ravines Strategy. .............................................................................................. 16 2. Restore ‘Ecological Integrity’ .......................................................................... 17 a) Increase ecological connectivity and buffers for biodiversity .................... 17 b) Regenerate and reintroduce: Seed forecasting and collection .................... 17 c) Plant ‘local’ native species ......................................................................... 18 d) Rank ‘invasiveness’ and remove invasive species ..................................... 19 3. Develop a comprehensive scientific protocol to monitor, restore, and steward the ‘Ecological Integrity’ of the Toronto ravines. ............................................ 20 4. Change mindsets with a new vision ................................................................. 21 a) Re-engineer law-making and enforcement ................................................. 21 b) Foster collaboration and partnership .......................................................... 21 c) Create a new funding and operational model ............................................. 22 TRRS PARTNERS - A CITY OF COLLABORATORS ............................................ 23 Appendix A - Motions to City by TRRS .......................................................................... 25 Appendix B - News articles and media exposure of the Toronto Ravine Revitalization Study (TRRS) team .................................................................................... 27 Appendix C - Public events that the Toronto Ravine Revitalization Study (TRRS) team organized and/or participated in ................................................................. 28 Appendix D - Historic ecological studies in the Toronto ravines (Tables 1, 2; L, Wong*) .................................................................................................................... 35 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Toronto ravines are one of world’s largest ‘urban ecosystems’. They cover an astonishing