DOCSLIB.ORG

Saatgut Vom Natürlichen Standort/Seeds From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saatgut Vom Natürlichen Standort/Seeds From Index Seminum 2014 ANNO 2014 COLLECTORUM - DESIDERATA 2015 Botanischer Garten Universität Duisburg-Essen ** = Saatgut vom natürlichen Standort / seeds from natural habitat, all other seeds from open pollination (hybridization possible) Acanthaceae 1. Schaueria flavicoma (Lindl.) N.E. Br. Amaryllidaceae 2. Allium cernuum Roth 3. Allium fistulosum L. 4. Allium sativum L. var. ophioscorodon 5. Allium schoenoprasum L. 6. Allium senescens ssp. montanum (Fr.) Holub. 7. Allium sphaerocephalon L. 8. Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng. 9. Allium ursinum L. 10. Clivia miniata (Lindl.) Bosse 11. Habranthus tubispathus (L'Hér.) Traub 12. Tulbaghia violacea Harv. Ammaranthaceae 13. Amaranthus caudatus L. 14. Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. 15. Chenopodium bonus-henricus L. 16. Chenopodium foliosum Asch. Annonaceae 17. Artabotrys hexapetalus (L.f.) Bhandari 18. Annona muricata L. Apiaceae 19. Anethum graveolens L. 20. Angelica sylvestris L. 21. Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. 22. Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm. 23. Apium graveolens L. 24. Astrantia major L. 25. Athamanta cretensis L. 26. Bupleurum rotundifolium L. 27. Carum carvi L. 28. Coriandrum sativum L. 29. Daucus carota L. 30. Eryngium campestre L. 31. Eryngium foetidum L. 32. Falcaria vulgaris Bernh. **Guntersblum, Weinberge 33. Foeniculum vulgare Mill. 34. Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch 35. Ligusticum mutellina Crantz 36. Meum athamanticum Jacq. 37. Myrrhis odorata Scop. 38. Pimpinella saxifraga L. 39. Sium sisarum L Apocynaceae 40. Acokanthera oblongifolia (Hochst.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex B.D.Jacks. 41. Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. 42. Rauvolfia verticillata (Lour.) Baill. Araceae 43. Nephthytis afzelii Schott Arecaceae 44. Licuala grandis H.Wendl. 45. Sabal minor (Jacq.) Pers. Aristolochiaceae 46. Aristolochia fimbriata Cham. Asclepiadaceae 47. Asclepias curassavica Griseb. 48. Asclepias syriaca L. Asparagaceae 49. Anthericum liliago L. 50. Asparagus asparagoides W. Wight 51. Asparagus horridus L. 52. Bowiea volubilis Harv. 53. Eucomis bicolor Baker 54. Muscari botryoides (L.) Mill. Asteraceae 55. Achillea millefolium L. 56. Achillea ptarmica L. 57. Anthemis tinctoria L. 58. Arctium lappa L. 59. Argyranthemum frutescens (L.) Sch.Bip. 60. Arnica longifolia D.C.Eaton 61. Arnica montana L. 62. Berkheya purpurea (DC.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Mast. 63. Bidens frondosa L. **Essen-Kettwig, Ruhraue 64. Buphthalmum salicifolium L. 65. Catananche caerulea L. 66. Centaurea jacea L. 67. Centaurea nigra L. 68. Centaurea scabiosa L. 69. Chamaemelum nobile (L.) All. 70. Cichorium intybus L. 71. Eupatorium cannabinum L.**Ratingen-Hösel, Wald 72. Helenium aromaticum L.H.Bailey 73. Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G.Don 74. Helichrysum foetidum (L.) Cass. 75. Inula helenium L. 76. Lactuca perennis L. 77. Lapsana communis L.**E-Kettwig, Werdener-Str. 78. Leontodon autumnalis L. 79. Leontodon hispidus L. 80. Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. 81. Matricaria chamomilla L.**E-Kettwig, Landsbergerstr. 82. Matricaria chamomilla L. 83. Pericallis appendiculata (L.f.) B.Nord. 84. Piqueria trinervia Cav. 85. Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh. 86. Santolina corsica Jord. & Fourr. 87. Santolina rosmarinifolia L. 88. Santolina viridis Willd. 89. Scorzonera hispanica L. 90. Serratula tinctoria L. 91. Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. 92. Sonchus arvensis L.**Vejlby, Dünen, DK 93. Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni 94. Tagetes lucida Cav.’Sweet Mace’ 95. Tanacetum balsamita L. 96. Tanacetum corymbosum (L.) Sch. Bip. 97. Tanacetum parthenium L. 98. Tanacetum vulgare L. 99. Telekia speciosa (Schreb.) Baumg. Basellaceae 100. Basella alba L. (= B. rubra L.) Bixaceae 101. Bixa orellana L. Boraginaceae 102. Alkanna tinctoria Tausch 103. Anchusa azurea Mill. 104. Anchusa officinalis L. 105. Borago officinalis L 106. Cerinthe glabra L. 107. Cerinthe major L. 108. Cynoglossum officinale Willk. 109. Echium brevirame Sprague & Hutch. 110. Echium candicans L. 111. Echium handiense Svent. 112. Echium onosmifolium Webb 113. Echium pininana Webb & Berthel. 114. Echium plantagineum L. 115. Echium russicum J.F. Gmel. 116. Echium simplex DC 117. Echium virescens DC. 118. Echium vulgare L. 119. Echium wildpretii H.Pearson ex Hook.f. 120. Lithospermum officinale L. 121. Lithospermum officinale **Ratingen-Hösel, Waldrand 122. Myosotis sylvatica Hoffm. 123. Symphytum officinale L. 124. Symphytum tuberosum L. Brassicaceae 125. Arabis hirsuta (L.) Scop. 126. Aurinia saxatilis (L.) Desv. 127. Barbarea intermedia Boreau 128. Barbarea vulgaris R.Br. 129. Bunias orientalis L. 130. Crambe hispanica L. ssp. abyssinica (Hochst. ex R. E. Fr.) Prina 131. Erysimum cheiranthoides L. 132. Erysimum × cheiri (L.) Crantz 133. Hesperis matronalis L. 134. Isatis tinctoria L. 135. Lunaria rediviva L. 136. Matthiola arborescens Sternb. var. alba 137. Matthiola maderensis Lowe 138. Raphanus sativus var. sativus L. 139. Sinapis alba L. Bromeliaceae 140. Billbergia kuhlmannii L.B.Sm. 141. Puya mirabilis (Mez) L.B.Sm. Burseraceae 142. Bursera fagaroides (Kunth) Engl. Cactaceae 143. Opuntia humifusa (Raf.) Raf. 144. Opuntia phaeacantha Engelm. 145. Opuntia phaeacantha Engelm ‘Albispina’ 146. Opuntia phaeacantha var. camanchica (Engelm. & J.M. Bigelow) L.D. Benson 147. Opuntia polyacantha var. hystericina (Engelm. & J.M. Bigelow) B.D. Parfitt Caesalpiniaceae 148. Senna corymbosa (Lamarck) H.S.Irwin & Barneby Campanulaceae 149. Azorina vidalii (H.C.Watson) Feer 150. Campanula cochleariifolia Lam. 151. Campanula persicifolia L. 152. Campanula rapunculoides L. 153. Campanula thyrsoides L. 154. Campanula trachelium L. 155. Hippobroma longiflora (L.) G.Don 156. Jasione laevis Lam. Cannabaceae 157. Cannabis sativa L. Cannaceae 158. Canna glauca L. 159. Canna paniculata Ruiz & Pav. 160. Canna tuerckheimii Kraenzl Caprifoliaceae 161. Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. 162. Cephalaria alpina (L.) Schrad. ex Roem. & Schult. 163. Cephalaria gigantea (Ledeb.) Bobrov 164. Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult. 165. Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult. **Harboore, DK 166. Scabiosa cretica L. 167. Scabiosa lucida Vill. 168. Succisa pratensis Moench 169. Valeriana officinalis L. Caricaceae 170. Carica papaya L. 171. Carica quercifolia (A.St.Hil.) Hieron. Caryophyllaceae 172. Dianthus barbatus L. 173. Dianthus chinensis L. 174. Dianthus deltoides L. 175. Dianthus superbus L. 176. Gypsophila repens L. 177. Gypsophila repens L. ‘Rosea’ 178. Lychnis flos-cuculi L. 179. Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link 180. Saponaria officinalis L. 181. Silene chalcedonica (L.) E.H.L.Krause 182. Silene conica L. 183. Silene coronaria (L.) Clairv. 184. Silene dioica (L.) Clairv. 185. Silene latifolia ssp. alba (Mill.) Greut. & Burdet. 186. Silene noctiflora L. 187. Silene undulata Aiton 188. Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke 189. Viscaria vulgaris Bernh. Cistaceae 190. Cistus creticus L. 191. Cistus creticus ssp. corsicus (Loisel.) Greuter & Burdet 192. Cistus creticus ssp. eriocephalus (Viv.) Greuter & Burdet 193. Cistus laurifolius L. 194. Cistus monspeliensis L. 195. Cistus parviflorus Lam. 196. Cistus salviifolius L. 197. Cistus sintenisii Litard. 198. Cistus symphytifolius Lam. 199. Cistus vaginatus Aiton 200. Helianthemum-Hybride ‘Rot’ 201. Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. 202. Tuberaria guttata (L.) Fourr. Colchicaceae 203. Colchicum autumnale L. Commelinaceae 204. Palisota bracteosa C.B.Clarke 205. Tradescantia spathacea Sw. Costaceaea 206. Costus megalobractea K.Schum. Crassulaceae 207. Aeonium nobile (Praeger) Praeger 208. Aeonium urbicum (C.Sm. ex Hornem.) Webb & Berthel. 209. Sedum telephium L. Cucurbitaceae 210. Bryonia cretica ssp. dioica (Jacq.) Tutin 211. Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex Poir. 212. Cyclanthera brachystachya (Ser.) Cogn. 213. Cyclanthera pedata (L.) Schrad. 214. Diplocyclos palmatus (L.) C.Jeffrey 215. Ecballium elaterium (L.) A.Rich. 216. Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb. 217. Luffa cylindrica (L.) M.Roem. Trichosanthes cucumerina L. Cyperaceae 218. Carex pendula Huds. 219. Carex remota L. 220. Cyperus fertilis Boeck. 221. Cyperus papyrus L. 222. Eriophorum latifolium Hoppe 223. Eriophorum chamissonis C.A.Mey. 224. Eriophorum vaginatum L. Dioscoreaceae 225. Dioscorea batatas Decne. ‘Takoro-Makino’ 226. Dioscorea polystachya Turcz 227. Tacca chantrieri André Droseraceae 228. Dionaea muscipula J.Ellis 229. Drosera filiformis Raf. 230. Drosera rotundifolia L. Ericaceae 231. Erica tetralix L. 232. Daboecia cantabrica (Huds.) K.Koch 233. Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton Euphorbiaceae 234. Homalanthus populifolius Graham 235. Ricinus communis L. ‘Carmencita’ Fabaceae 236. Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. 237. Anthyllis vulneraria L. **Bovbjerg Fyr, Küste, DK 238. Astragalus glycyphyllos L. 239. Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth 240. Cajanus goensis Dalzell 241. Canavalia gladiata (Savi) DC. 242. Cassia fistula L.**Laos, Luang Prabang, Lao Spirit Resort 243. Colutea arborescens L. 244. Cytisus nigricans L. 245. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link 246. Galega officinalis L. 247. Glycine soja Siebold & Zucc. 248. Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa (Lindl.) J.M.Black 249. Indigofera suffruticosa Mill. 250. Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet 251. Lathyrus japonicus Willd. **Vejlby, Dünen, DK 252. Lathyrus latifolius L. 253. Lathyrus odoratus L. 254. Lathyrus vernus (L.) Bernh. 255. Lotus corniculatus L. 256. Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. 257. Medicago lupulina L. 258. Melilotus albus Medik. 259. Mimosa pudica L. 260. Ononis spinosa L. 261. Phaseolus coccineus L. 262. Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Spatzeneier’ 263. Retama raetam Webb & Berthel. 264. Rhynchosia pyramidalis Urb. 265. Securigera varia (L.) Lassen 266. Sesbania sesban Britton 267. Trifolium arvense L. **Vejlby, Dünen,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status of the Umbelliferae Ssp. in Russia
    Status of the Umbelliferae ssp. in Russia Tatiana Khmelinskaya Olga Zvereva Anna Artemyeva The collection status The formation of Russian Umbelliferae collection had begun in 1923 after N.I.Vavilov visit West-European countries, USA and Canada (1921- 1922), from the seed samples shipped by breeding companies of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria. Russian resources were registered in VIR collection through All-Russian agricultural exhibition. The local landraces were collected during collection missions in Afghanistan, Iran, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Turkey, etc. In 1926 VIR scientists started to study the collection. From 1928 the new expeditions were arranged to Mediterranean countries, Ethiopia, and Western China by Vavilov, to India by Markovich, to Minor Asia of Zhukovskiy, etc. , and also collection had started to grow by exchange of material with different Institutes and companies. Now VIR Genebank contains genetic resources of different status from more than 90 countries, includes wild species, landraces, old and advanced cultivars, hybrids F1, breeding materials . Umbelliferae collections are divided into two parts: constant (base) catalogue and temporary catalogue. The constant catalogue includes landraces and breeding cultivars with sufficient quantity of seeds in accession. All accessions of constant catalogue are documented for computerized passport data. The temporary catalogue includes the hybrids F1, breeding materials and the samples with insufficient quantity of seeds. These latter cultivars need to
    [Show full text]
  • Seedling Establishment, Bud Movement, and Subterranean Diversity of Geophilous Systems in Apiaceae
    Flora (2002) 197, 385–393 http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/flora Seedling establishment, bud movement, and subterranean diversity of geophilous systems in Apiaceae Norbert Pütz1* & Ina Sukkau2 1 Institute of Nature Conservation and Environmental Education, University of Vechta, Driverstr. 22, D-49377 Vechta, Germany 2 Institute of Botany, RWTH Aachen, Germany * author for correspondence: e-mail: [email protected] Received: Nov 29, 2001 · Accepted: Jun 10, 2002 Summary Geophilous systems of plants are not only regarded as organs of underground storage. Such systems also undergo a large range of modifications in order to fulfill other ‚cryptical‘ functions, e.g. positioning of innovation buds, vegetative cloning, and vege- tative dispersal. Seedlings should always be the point of departure for any investigation into the structure of geophilous systems. This is because in the ability to survive of geophilous plants it is of primary importance that innovation buds can reach a safe position in the soil by the time the first period hostile to vegetation commences. Our analysis of such systems thus focused on examining the development of 34 species of the Apiaceae, beginning with their germination. Independent of life-form and life-span, all species exhibit noticeable terminal bud movement with the aid of contractile organs. Movement was found to be at least 5 mm, reaching a maximum of 45 mm. All species exhibit a noticeable contraction of the primary root. In most cases the contraction phenomenon also occurs in the hypocotyl, and some species show contraction of their lateral and / or adventitious roots. Analysis of movement shows the functional importance of pulling the inno- vation buds down into the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Lineages Within Apiaceae Subfamily Apioideae: a Comparison of Chloroplast Restriction Site and Dna Sequence Data1
    American Journal of Botany 86(7): 1014±1026. 1999. MAJOR LINEAGES WITHIN APIACEAE SUBFAMILY APIOIDEAE: A COMPARISON OF CHLOROPLAST RESTRICTION SITE AND DNA SEQUENCE DATA1 GREGORY M. PLUNKETT2 AND STEPHEN R. DOWNIE Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Traditional sources of taxonomic characters in the large and taxonomically complex subfamily Apioideae (Apiaceae) have been confounding and no classi®cation system of the subfamily has been widely accepted. A restriction site analysis of the chloroplast genome from 78 representatives of Apioideae and related groups provided a data matrix of 990 variable characters (750 of which were potentially parsimony-informative). A comparison of these data to that of three recent DNA sequencing studies of Apioideae (based on ITS, rpoCl intron, and matK sequences) shows that the restriction site analysis provides 2.6± 3.6 times more variable characters for a comparable group of taxa. Moreover, levels of divergence appear to be well suited to studies at the subfamilial and tribal levels of Apiaceae. Cladistic and phenetic analyses of the restriction site data yielded trees that are visually congruent to those derived from the other recent molecular studies. On the basis of these comparisons, six lineages and one paraphyletic grade are provisionally recognized as informal groups. These groups can serve as the starting point for future, more intensive studies of the subfamily. Key words: Apiaceae; Apioideae; chloroplast genome; restriction site analysis; Umbelliferae. Apioideae are the largest and best-known subfamily of tem, and biochemical characters exhibit similarly con- Apiaceae (5 Umbelliferae) and include many familiar ed- founding parallelisms (e.g., Bell, 1971; Harborne, 1971; ible plants (e.g., carrot, parsnips, parsley, celery, fennel, Nielsen, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Index Seminum 2015 List of Seeds for Exchange
    Index Seminum 2015 List of seeds for exchange Glasgow Botanic Gardens 730 Great Western Road Glasgow, G12 OUE Scotland, United Kingdom History of Glasgow Botanic Gardens The Botanic Gardens were founded on an 8-acre site at the West End of Sauchiehall Street at Sandyford in 1817. This was through the initiative of Thomas Hopkirk of Dalbeth who gave his own plant collection to form the nucleus of the new garden. It was run by the Royal Botanical Institution of Glasgow and an agreement was reached with Glasgow University to provide facilities for teaching, including supply of plants for botanical and medical classes. Professor William J. Hooker, Regius Professor of Botany at the University of Glasgow (1820-41), took an active part in the development of the Gardens, which became well known in botanical circles throughout the world. The early success led to expansion and the purchase of the present site, at Kelvinside, in 1842. At the time entry was mainly restricted to members of the Royal Botanical Institution and their friends although later the public were admitted on selected days for the princely sum of one penny. The Kibble Palace which houses the national tree fern collection was originally a private conservatory located at Coulport by Loch Long. It was moved to its present site in 1873 and originally used as a concert venue and meeting place, hosting speakers such as Prime Ministers Disraeli and Gladstone. Increasing financial difficulties led to the Gardens being taken over by the then Glasgow Corporation in 1891 on condition they continued as a Botanic Garden and maintained links with the University.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Garden Plants
    COLONIAL GARD~J~ PLANTS I Flowers Before 1700 The following plants are listed according to the names most commonly used during the colonial period. The botanical name follows for accurate identification. The common name was listed first because many of the people using these lists will have access to or be familiar with that name rather than the botanical name. The botanical names are according to Bailey’s Hortus Second and The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture (3, 4). They are not the botanical names used during the colonial period for many of them have changed drastically. We have been very cautious concerning the interpretation of names to see that accuracy is maintained. By using several references spanning almost two hundred years (1, 3, 32, 35) we were able to interpret accurately the names of certain plants. For example, in the earliest works (32, 35), Lark’s Heel is used for Larkspur, also Delphinium. Then in later works the name Larkspur appears with the former in parenthesis. Similarly, the name "Emanies" appears frequently in the earliest books. Finally, one of them (35) lists the name Anemones as a synonym. Some of the names are amusing: "Issop" for Hyssop, "Pum- pions" for Pumpkins, "Mushmillions" for Muskmellons, "Isquou- terquashes" for Squashes, "Cowslips" for Primroses, "Daffadown dillies" for Daffodils. Other names are confusing. Bachelors Button was the name used for Gomphrena globosa, not for Centaurea cyanis as we use it today. Similarly, in the earliest literature, "Marygold" was used for Calendula. Later we begin to see "Pot Marygold" and "Calen- dula" for Calendula, and "Marygold" is reserved for Marigolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Read Transcriptome and Other Genomic Resources for the Angiosperm Silene Noctiflora
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.09.243378; this version posted August 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Long-read transcriptome and other genomic resources for the angiosperm Silene noctiflora Alissa M. Williams,*,1 Michael W. Itgen,* Amanda K. Broz,* Olivia G. Carter,* Daniel B. Sloan* *Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 1Corresponding author: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.09.243378; this version posted August 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Abstract 2 3 The angiosperm genus Silene is a model system for several traits of ecological and evolutionary 4 significance in plants, including breeding system and sex chromosome evolution, host-pathogen 5 interactions, invasive species biology, heavy metal tolerance, and cytonuclear interactions. 6 Despite its importance, genomic resources for this large genus of approximately 850 species are 7 scarce, with only one published whole-genome sequence (from the dioecious species S. latifolia). 8 Here, we provide genomic and transcriptomic resources for a hermaphroditic representative of 9 this genus (S. noctiflora), including a PacBio Iso-Seq transcriptome, which uses long-read, 10 single-molecule sequencing technology to analyze full-length mRNA transcripts and identify 11 paralogous genes and alternatively spliced genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Wild Food Plants for Human Consumption in Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey)
    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 14(2), April 2015, pp. 183-190 Survey of wild food plants for human consumption in Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey) İdris Kaval1, Lütfi Behçet2 & Uğur Çakilcioğlu3* 1Yuzuncu Yıl University, Department of Biology, Van 65000, Turkey; 2Bingöl University, Department of Biology, Bingöl 12000, Turkey; 3Tunceli University, Pertek Sakine Genç Vocational School, Pertek, Tunceli 62500, Turkey E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Received 15 July 2014, revised 22 January 2015 This study aims to record accumulation of knowledge on plants which are used as food by native people of Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey) that has a rich culture and a very natural environment. In addition, the medical uses of these plants were compiled from the literature. Study area was located on the East of Anatolian diagonal, in the Eastern Anatolia region. Field study was carried out over a period of approximately two years (2008-2010). During this period, 84 vascular plant taxa were collected. The plants were pressed in the field and prepared for identification. A total of 84 food plants belonging to 30 families were identified in the region. In the study being conducted, use of wild plants as food points out interest of people in Geçitli in wild plants. The fact that a large proportion of edible plants are also being used for medicinal purposes indicates that the use of wild plants has a high potential in the region. The present study shows that further ethnobotanical investigations are worthy to be carried out in Turkey, where most of knowledge on popular food plants are still to discover.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Origin and Importance of the Apiaceae Family
    1 TAXONOMY, ORIGIN AND IMPORTANCE OF THE APIACEAE FAMILY JEAN-PIERRE REDURON* Mulhouse, France The Apiaceae (or Umbelliferae) is a plant family comprising at the present time 466 genera and about 3800 species (Plunkett et al., 2018). It is distributed nearly worldwide, but is most diverse in temperate climatic areas, such as Eurasia and North America. It is quite rare in tropical humid regions where it is limited to high mountains. Mediterranean and arid climatic conditions favour high species diversification. The Apiaceae are present in nearly all types of habi- tats, from sea-level to alpine zones: aquatic biotopes, grasslands, grazed pas- tures, forests including their clearings and margins, cliffs, screes, rocky hills, open sandy and gravelly soils, steppes, cultivated fields, fallows, road sides and waste grounds. The largest number of genera, 289, and the largest generic endemism, 177, is found in Asia. There are 126 genera in Europe, but only 17 are en- demic. Africa has about the same total with 121 genera, where North Africa encompasses the largest occurrence of 82 genera, 13 of which are endemic. North and Central America have a fairly high level of diversity with 80 genera and 44 endemics, where South America accommodates less generic diversity with 35 genera, 15 of which are endemic. Oceania is home to 27 genera and 18 endemics (Plunkett et al., 2018). The Apiaceae family appears to have originated in Australasia (region including Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand, New Guinea, New Caledonia and several island groups), with this origin dated to the Late Cretaceous/ early Eocene, c.87 Ma (Nicolas and Plunkett, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience Elicited by Hallucinogens Presents the Highest Similarity to Dreaming Within a Large Database of Psychoactive Substance Reports
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 22 January 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00007 The Experience Elicited by Hallucinogens Presents the Highest Similarity to Dreaming within a Large Database of Psychoactive Substance Reports Camila Sanz 1, Federico Zamberlan 1, Earth Erowid 2, Fire Erowid 2 and Enzo Tagliazucchi 1,3* 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2 Erowid Center, Grass Valley, CA, United States, 3 Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Ever since the modern rediscovery of psychedelic substances by Western society, Edited by: several authors have independently proposed that their effects bear a high resemblance Rick Strassman, to the dreams and dreamlike experiences occurring naturally during the sleep-wake University of New Mexico School of cycle. Recent studies in humans have provided neurophysiological evidence supporting Medicine, United States this hypothesis. However, a rigorous comparative analysis of the phenomenology (“what Reviewed by: Matthias E. Liechti, it feels like” to experience these states) is currently lacking. We investigated the semantic University Hospital Basel, Switzerland similarity between a large number of subjective reports of psychoactive substances and Michael Kometer, University of Zurich, Switzerland reports of high/low lucidity dreams, and found that the highest-ranking substance in *Correspondence: terms of the similarity to high lucidity dreams was the serotonergic psychedelic lysergic Enzo Tagliazucchi acid diethylamide (LSD), whereas the highest-ranking in terms of the similarity to dreams [email protected] of low lucidity were plants of the Datura genus, rich in deliriant tropane alkaloids. Specialty section: Conversely, sedatives, stimulants, antipsychotics, and antidepressants comprised most This article was submitted to of the lowest-ranking substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Saatgut Vom Natürlichen Standort/Seeds From
    Index Seminum 2016 ANNO 2016 COLLECTORUM - DESIDERATA 2017 Botanischer Garten Universität Duisburg-Essen ** = Saatgut vom natürlichen Standort / seeds from natural habitat, all other seeds from open pollination (hybridization possible) Acanthaceae 1. Acanthus spinosus L. 2. Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees 3. Schaueria flavicoma N.E.Br. 4. Thunbergia alata Bojer ex Sims Adoxaceae 5. Viburnum rhytidophyllum Hemsl. Amaranthaceae 6. Chenopodium bonus-henricus L. Amaryllidaceae 7. Agapanthus campanulatus 8. Allium cernuum Roth 9. Allium fistulosum L. 10. Allium obliquum L. 11. Allium sativum L. var. ophioscorodon 12. Allium schoenoprasum L. 13. Allium sphaerocephalon L. 14. Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng. 15. Allium ursinum L. 16. Clivia miniata (Lindl.) Bosse 17. Tulbaghia simmleri Beauverd 18. Tulbaghia violacea Harv. Annonaceae 19. Annona muricata L. 20. Annona cherimola, Kulturform 21. Artabotrys hexapetalus (L.f.) Bhandari Apiaceae 22. Ammi majus L. 23. Angelica archangelica L. 24. Angelica sylvestris L. 25. Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. 26. Apium graveolens L. 27. Astrantia carniolica Wulfen 1 28. Astrantia major L. 29. Athamanta cretensis L. 30. Bupleurum rotundifolium L. 31. Carum carvi L. 32. Coriandrum sativum L. 33. Daucus carota L. 34. Eryngium campestre L. 35. Eryngium foetidum L. 36. Foeniculum vulgare Mill. 37. Foeniculum vulgare Mill. ‚Purpureum‘ 38. Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch 39. Ligusticum lucidum Mill 40. Ligusticum scoticum L. 41. Mutellina adonidifolia (J.Gay) Gutermann 42. Myrrhis odorata Scop. 43. Oenanthe lachenalii C.C.Gmel. 44. Oenanthe pimpinelloides L. 45. Pimpinella saxifraga L. 46. Sanicula europaea L. 47. Scandix pecten-veneris L. 48. Sium sisarum L. 49. Torilis japonica (Houtt.) DC Apocynaceae 50. Acokanthera oblongifolia (Hochst.) Benth.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsh Woundwort, Stachys Palustris L. (Lamiaceae): an Overlooked Food Plant
    Genet Resour Crop Evol (2011) 58:783–793 DOI 10.1007/s10722-011-9710-9 NOTES ON NEGLECTED AND UNDERUTILIZED CROPS Marsh woundwort, Stachys palustris L. (Lamiaceae): an overlooked food plant Łukasz J. Łuczaj • Ingvar Svanberg • Piotr Ko¨hler Received: 24 December 2010 / Accepted: 23 May 2011 / Published online: 14 June 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract The aim of this article is to study the century European economic botany literature, partic- geographical distribution and historical patterns of ularly in Sweden and Great Britain. These publica- use of a little known root crop native to Europe— tions tried to popularize the use of S. palustris as marsh woundwort Stachys palustris L. The species food. However, there is no firm evidence from these grows in wet grasslands and arable fields. It produces countries that marsh woundwort was used as food edible tubers. Both ethnographic literature and there. Marsh woundwort was also used, throughout archival sources were searched. Seventeen reliable northern and central Europe, as pig fodder and as a references concerning the consumption of S. palustris medicinal plant, particularly for healing wounds. in southern and south–eastern Poland were found. Further studies on the nutritive value of this forgotten The tubers were usually dried and powdered, and crop should be undertaken, particularly that there is then added to soups or to bread dough. They were little knowledge of the chemical composition of both also eaten as raw snacks. The plant was used mainly marsh woundwort and its Asian relative Stachys during food shortages in spring, until the turn of the affinis widely cultivated in China as a vegetable.
    [Show full text]
  • BSBI News No
    BSBINews January 2006 No. 101 Edited by Leander Wolstenholm & Gwynn Ellis Delosperma nubigenum at Petersfield, photo © Christine Wain 2005 Illecebrum verticillatum at Aldershot, photo © Tony Mundell 2005 CONTENTS EDITORIAL. .............................................................. 2 Echinochloa crus-galli (Cockspur) on FROM THE PRESIDENT .....................R ..1. Gornall 3 roadsides in S. England.............. 8o.1. Leach 37 NOTES Egeria densa (Large-flowered Waterweed) Splitting hairs - the key to vegetative - in flower in Surrey ...... .1. David & M Spencer 39 Identification.................................. .1. Poland 4 A potential undescribed Erigeron hybrid Sheathed Sedge (Carex vaginata): an update ...................................... R.M Burton 39 on its status in the Northern Pennines Oxalis dillenii: a follow-up .............1. Presland 40 R. Corner,.1. Roberts & L. Robinson 6 Some interesting alien plants in V.c. 12 A newly reported site for Gentianella anglica .................... .................... A. Mundell 42 (Early Gentian) in S. Hampshire ..... M Rand 8 'Stipa arundinacea' in Taunton, S. Somerset White Wood-rush (Luzula luzuloides) (v.c. 5) ........................................ 80.1. Leach 43 naturalised on Great Dun Fell, Street-wise 'aliens' in Taunton (v.c. 5) northern Pennines, Cumbria........ .R. Corner 9 ......................................... 80.1. Leach 44 Plant Rings ..................................D. MacIntyre 10 The Plantsman - a botanical journal Observations on acid grassland flora of ...............................................
    [Show full text]